Mosses of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2.10 Meesia Longiseta HEDW. Code: 1389 Anhang: II
2.10 Meesia longiseta HEDW. Code: 1389 Anhang: II KLAUS WEDDELING, GERHARD LUDWIG & MONIKA HACHTEL, Bonn Namen: D: Langstieliges Schwanenhalsmoos, Langstieliges Meesemoos, Gestreckte Langborste E: Long-stalked Thread Moss, Long-shafted Swan Moss, F: – Systematik/Taxonomie: Bryophyta, Bryopsida, Bryidae, Splachnales, Meesiaceae. Synonyme: Amblyodon longisetus (HEDW.) P. BEAUV. Kennzeichen/Artbestimmung: Meesia longiseta ist ein 4–8 (–10) cm hohes, akrokarpes, unverzweigtes Laubmoos von grün-schwärzlicher Färbung. Die Art wächst in lockeren, weichen Rasen (Abb. 2.9). Das Stämmchen ist bis in die Spitze wurzelhaarig und im Moose Querschnitt dreikantig. Die Blättchen sind mehr oder weniger deutlich in 3 oder 6 Rei- hen angeordnet und vom Stämmchen abgespreizt. Die 2–3,5 mm langen, spitzen Blätt- chen laufen deutlich am Stämmchen herab, sind oberwärts gekielt, ganzrandig oder an der Spitze etwas gezähnt. Ihre deutlich entwickelte Rippe endet unterhalb der Blattspitze. Der Blattrand ist flach. Die Laminazellen sind rechteckig bis rhombisch und etwa 14 µm breit. Die rötlichen, gedrehten Seten der synözischen Art können über 10 cm lang wer- den. Die langbirnenförmige, aufrechte Kapsel hat einen deutlichen Hals. Bei der Spo- renreife im Juni und Juli werden die mit 36–44 µm Durchmesser recht großen Sporen frei- gesetzt. Die Chromosomenzahl ist nicht bekannt (FRITSCH 1991). Differenzierende Merkmale zu den ähnlichen Arten Meesia uliginosa und M. hexasticha sind der nicht ein- gerollte Blattrand, die kleineren Sporen und der Rippenquerschnitt mit kleinen, inneren Zellen (zusammengestellt nach CRUM & ANDERSON 1981, FRAHM 1979, LIMPRICHT 1895). Abbildungen der Art finden sich bei CRUM & ANDERSON (1981, Fig. 296, 297, S. 628, 629: Blättchen, Blattspitze, Habitus, Kapsel) und FRAHM (1979, Fig. -
Mosses: Weber and Wittmann, Electronic Version 11-Mar-00
Catalog of the Colorado Flora: a Biodiversity Baseline Mosses: Weber and Wittmann, electronic version 11-Mar-00 Amblystegiaceae Amblystegium Bruch & Schimper, 1853 Amblystegium serpens (Hedwig) Bruch & Schimper var. juratzkanum (Schimper) Rau & Hervey WEBER73B. Amblystegium juratzkanum Schimper. Calliergon (Sullivant) Kindberg, 1894 Calliergon cordifolium (Hedwig) Kindberg WEBER73B; HERMA76. Calliergon giganteum (Schimper) Kindberg Larimer Co.: Pingree Park, 2960 msm, 25 Sept. 1980, [Rolston 80114), !Hermann. Calliergon megalophyllum Mikutowicz COLO specimen so reported is C. richardsonii, fide Crum. Calliergon richardsonii (Mitten) Kindberg WEBER73B. Campyliadelphus (Lindberg) Chopra, 1975 KANDA75 Campyliadelphus chrysophyllus (Bridel) Kanda HEDEN97. Campylium chrysophyllum (Bridel) J. Lange. WEBER63; WEBER73B; HEDEN97. Hypnum chrysophyllum Bridel. HEDEN97. Campyliadelphus stellatus (Hedwig) Kanda KANDA75. Campylium stellatum (Hedwig) C. Jensen. WEBER73B. Hypnum stellatum Hedwig. HEDEN97. Campylophyllum Fleischer, 1914 HEDEN97 Campylophyllum halleri (Hedwig) Fleischer HEDEN97. Nova Guinea 12, Bot. 2:123.1914. Campylium halleri (Hedwig) Lindberg. WEBER73B; HERMA76. Hypnum halleri Hedwig. HEDEN97. Campylophyllum hispidulum (Bridel) Hedenäs HEDEN97. Campylium hispidulum (Bridel) Mitten. WEBER63,73B; HEDEN97. Hypnum hispidulum Bridel. HEDEN97. Cratoneuron (Sullivant) Spruce, 1867 OCHYR89 Cratoneuron filicinum (Hedwig) Spruce WEBER73B. Drepanocladus (C. Müller) Roth, 1899 HEDEN97 Nomen conserv. Drepanocladus aduncus (Hedwig) Warnstorf WEBER73B. -
New York Natural Heritage Program Rare Plant Status List May 2004 Edited By
New York Natural Heritage Program Rare Plant Status List May 2004 Edited by: Stephen M. Young and Troy W. Weldy This list is also published at the website: www.nynhp.org For more information, suggestions or comments about this list, please contact: Stephen M. Young, Program Botanist New York Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway, 5th Floor Albany, NY 12233-4757 518-402-8951 Fax 518-402-8925 E-mail: [email protected] To report sightings of rare species, contact our office or fill out and mail us the Natural Heritage reporting form provided at the end of this publication. The New York Natural Heritage Program is a partnership with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and by The Nature Conservancy. Major support comes from the NYS Biodiversity Research Institute, the Environmental Protection Fund, and Return a Gift to Wildlife. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... Page ii Why is the list published? What does the list contain? How is the information compiled? How does the list change? Why are plants rare? Why protect rare plants? Explanation of categories.................................................................................................................... Page iv Explanation of Heritage ranks and codes............................................................................................ Page iv Global rank State rank Taxon rank Double ranks Explanation of plant -
(Bryopsida: Splachnaceae). Lily Roberta Lewis University of Connecticut, [email protected]
University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Doctoral Dissertations University of Connecticut Graduate School 5-7-2015 Resolving Amphitropical Phylogeographic Histories in the Common Dung Moss Tetraplodon (Bryopsida: Splachnaceae). Lily Roberta Lewis University of Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Lewis, Lily Roberta, "Resolving Amphitropical Phylogeographic Histories in the Common Dung Moss Tetraplodon (Bryopsida: Splachnaceae)." (2015). Doctoral Dissertations. 747. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/747 Resolving Amphitropical Phylogeographic Histories in the Common Dung Moss Tetraplodon (Bryopsida: Splachnaceae). Lily Roberta Lewis, PhD University of Connecticut, 2015 Many plants have geographic disjunctions, with one of the more rare, yet extreme being the amphitropical, or bipolar disjunction. Bryophytes (namely mosses and liverworts) exhibit this pattern more frequently relative to other groups of plants and typically at or below the level of species. The processes that have shaped the amphitropical disjunction have been infrequently investigated, with notably a near absence of studies focusing on mosses. This dissertation explores the amphitropical disjunction in the dung moss Tetraplodon, with a special emphasis on the origin of the southernmost South American endemic T. fuegianus. Chapter 1 delimits three major lineages within Tetraplodon with distinct yet overlapping geographic ranges, including an amphitropical lineage containing the southernmost South American endemic T. fuegianus. Based on molecular divergence date estimation and phylogenetic topology, the American amphitropical disjunction is traced to a single direct long-distance dispersal event across the tropics. Chapter 2 provides the first evidence supporting the role of migratory shore birds in dispersing bryophytes, as well as other plant, fungal, and algal diaspores across the tropics. -
Resolving the Northern Hemisphere Source Region for the Long-Distance Dispersal Event That Gave Rise to the South American Endemic Dung Moss Tetraplodon Fuegianus 1
AJB Advance Article published on November 9, 2017, as 10.3732/ajb.1700144. The latest version is at http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/doi/10.3732/ajb.1700144 RESEARCH ARTICLE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY INVITED PAPER For the Special Issue: Patterns and Processes of American Amphitropical Plant Disjunctions: New Insights Resolving the northern hemisphere source region for the long-distance dispersal event that gave rise to the South American endemic dung moss 1 Tetraplodon fuegianus Lily R. Lewis 2,3,8 , Elisabeth M. Biersma 4,5 , Sarah B. Carey3 , Kent Holsinger2 , Stuart F. McDaniel 3 , Ricardo Rozzi6,7 , and Bernard Goffi net 2 PREMISE OF THE STUDY: American bipolar plant distributions characterize taxa at various taxonomic ranks but are most common in the bryophytes at infra- specifi c and infrageneric levels. A previous study on the bipolar disjunction in the dung moss genus Tetraplodon found that direct long-distance dispersal from North to South in the Miocene–Pleistocene accounted for the origin of the Southern American endemic Tetraplodon fuegianus , congruent with other molecular studies on bipolar bryophytes. The previous study, however, remained inconclusive regarding a specifi c northern hemisphere source region for the transequatorial dispersal event that gave rise to T. fuegianus . METHODS: To estimate spatial genetic structure and phylogeographic relationships within the bipolar lineage of Tetraplodon , which includes T. fuegianus , we analyzed thousands of restriction-site-associated DNA (RADseq) loci and single nucleotide polymorphisms using Bayesian individual assignment and maximum likelihood and coalescent model based phylogenetic approaches. KEY RESULTS: Northwestern North America is the most likely source of the recent ancestor to T. -
Bryophyte Flora of the Czech Republic: Updated Checklist and Red List and a Brief Analysis
Preslia 84: 813–850, 2012 813 Bryophyte flora of the Czech Republic: updated checklist and Red List and a brief analysis Bryoflóra České republiky: aktualizace seznamu a červeného seznamu a stručná analýza Dedicated to the centenary of the Czech Botanical Society (1912–2012) Jan K u č e r a1, Jiří Vá ň a2 & Zbyněk H r a d í l e k3 1University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Branišovská 31, CZ–370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Charles University Prague, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Benátská 2, CZ–128 01 Prague 2, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 3Palacký University Olomouc, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Šlechtitelů 11, CZ-783 71 Olomouc-Holice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]. Kučera J., Váňa J. & Hradílek Z. (2012): Bryophyte flora of the Czech Republic: updated checklist and Red List and a brief analysis. – Preslia 84: 813–850. The bryoflora of the Czech Republic is analysed using an updated version of the checklist that includes recent taxonomic and nomenclatural changes. In addition, the baseline data was com- pletely revised using the IUCN 3.1 criteria. The main list includes 863 species of bryophytes (4 hornworts, 207 liverworts and 652 mosses) with 5 additional subspecies and 23 generally recog- nized varieties; 9 additional species are listed as of doubtful taxonomic status and 17 other species are evaluated as of uncertain occurrence. Of the 892 taxa evaluated, 46% qualified for inclusion in Red List categories (40 taxa in category RE, 70 in CR, 88 in EN, 93 in VU, 66 in LR-nt, 24 in DD-va and 30 in DD), while 54% are considered Least Concern (LC). -
Annotated Checklist of Hungarian Bryophytes
Studia bot. hung. 35, pp. 91–149, 2004 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF HUNGARIAN BRYOPHYTES P. ERZBERGER1 and B. PAPP2 1Belziger Str. 37, D-10823 Berlin, Germany; E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Botany, Hungarian Natural History Museum H-1476 Budapest, Pf. 222, Hungary; E-mail: [email protected] The checklist presented below contains 629 bryophyte taxa in 199 genera, 2 species of hornworts in 2 genera, 141 species and 2 additional subspecies of liverworts in 50 genera and 483 species and 1 addi- tional subspecies of mosses in 147 genera. It is the first inventory of Hungarian bryophytes in twenty years. Not all problems resulting from changes in taxonomy could be resolved yet, but the fields where further research is necessary are pointed out. Separate lists of excluded (46), doubtful (42) and recently added taxa (30) are provided. The annotations comment on taxonomic and nomenclatural changes, quote specimen details or contain otherwise relevant information. Key words: bryophytes, checklist, Hungary INTRODUCTION This is the first attempt to prepare an up-dated checklist of all bryophyte taxa of Hungary, more than twenty years after the publication of the “Handbook of the Hungarian Bryoflora” (ORBÁN and VAJDA 1983). Since then, partly as a result of fieldwork and partly resulting from herbarium revision, several new species have been added to the Hungarian bryoflora. Other taxa, some reported in ORBÁN and VAJDA (1983) and many in numerous other papers as occurring in Hungary, are now considered to be absent from Hungary, due to the application of better de- scriptions of taxa or to the amendment of various errors, especially with respect to geography. -
Bryaceae, Bryophyta) in Russia Заметки К Систематике И Географии Некоторых Видов Рода Bryum Hedw
Arctoa (2006) 15: 155-162 ON SYSTEMATICS AND DISTRIBUTION OF SOME SPECIES OF BRYUM (BRYACEAE, BRYOPHYTA) IN RUSSIA ЗАМЕТКИ К СИСТЕМАТИКЕ И ГЕОГРАФИИ НЕКОТОРЫХ ВИДОВ РОДА BRYUM HEDW. (BRYACEAE, BRYOPHYTA) В РОССИИ VALERIJ I. ZOLOTOV1 ВАЛЕРИЙ И. ЗОЛОТОВ1 Abstract Systematics of several species of Bryum is discussed, with the special attention to groups where the species concept was considerably expanded by the recent suggestions of Holyoak. The observa- tions based on material from Russia support the traditional, more narrow understanding of: (1) Bryum archangelicum and Bryum amblyodon; (2) Bryum purpurascens and Bryum arcticum; (3) Bryum calophyllum and B. axel-blyttii. Rare species, B. teres and B. sibiricum are commented, and B. planiusculum is synonymized with B. turbinatum. New records of Bryum species for some provinces of Russia are also provided. Резюме Обсуждается систематика некоторых видов, которые в недавней работе Holyoak было предложено понимать значительно шире, чем традиционно. Приводятся аргументы в пользу традиционного понимания объема и дифференциальных признаков следующих пар видов: (1) Bryum archangelicum и Bryum amblyodon; (2) Bryum purpurascens и Bryum arcticum; (3) Bryum calophyllum и B. axel-blyttii. Комментируются редкие в России B. teres и B. sibiricum, а B. planiusculum отнесен в синонимы B. turbinatum. Сообщается о новых находках некоторых видов в регионах России, где они ранее не отмечались. The genus Bryum is the largest one in the bryo- ual condition. In the lowland B. amblyodon is flora of Russia. Many groups of it are still insuffi- usually a large moss, having shoots up to 15 mm ciently known, both regarding to taxonomy and and setae up to 40 mm. -
An Updated Checklist of Mosses of Xinjiang, China1 Новый Список Мхов Синьцзяня, Китай1
Arctoa (1995) 4: 1-14 AN UPDATED CHECKLIST OF MOSSES OF XINJIANG, CHINA1 НОВЫЙ СПИСОК МХОВ СИНЬЦЗЯНЯ, КИТАЙ1 BENITO C. TAN2, JIAN-CHENG ZHAO3 AND REN-LIANG HU4 Abstract An updated checklist of Xinjiang mosses based on past publications and new collec- tions made in 1993 showed a total of 130 genera, 339 species and 8 infraspecific taxa. Twelve species and two varieties are reported here as new to China. They are Amblyodon dealbatus, Bryum schleicheri var. latifolium, Conardia compacta, Cynodontium schistii, Dicranella schreberiana, Orthotrichum cupulatum, O. hallii, O. pallens, O. speciosum var. elegans, Physcomitrium pyriforme, Pottia bryoides, P. heimii, Sphagnum warnstorfii and Tortella nitida. Amblyodon and Conardia are two new moss generic records for China. Резюме Новый список листостебельных мхов Синьцзян-Уйгурского автономного округа (северо-западный Китай) основан на последних публикациях и сборах авторов в 1993 году. Список включает 339 видов и 8 внутривидовых таксонов из 130 родов. Двенадцать видов и две разновидности приводятся впервые для Китая: Amblyodon dealbatus, Bryum schleicheri var. latifolium, Conardia compacta, Cynodontium schistii, Dicranella schreberiana, Orthotrichum cupulatum, O. hallii, O. pallens, O. speciosum var. elegans, Physcomitrium pyriforme, Pottia bryoides, P. heimii, Sphagnum warnstorfii и Tortella nitida. Два рода, Amblyodon и Conardia, найдены в Китае впервые. INTRODUCTION Himalayan Range, moist air currents from the The study area, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Indian Ocean fail to reach Xinjiang, resulting in Region, is the largest province of China, repre- the vast expanse of arid terrain. Hydrologically, senting roughly 1/6 of the national territory. It there is a progressive increase of precipitation is situated in the northwestern corner of the coun- from south to north, with the Altai region re- try (34° 15'-49° 11' N, 73° 21'-96° 25' E) with a ceiving the highest annual precipitation. -
The Urgent Need for Strong Legal Protection of British Columbia's Biodiversity the Urgent Need for Strong Legal Protection Of
ritish Columbia is blessed with biodiversity that is on par with some of the great wilderness areas on the planet, such as the Amazon, the Boreal Rich Wildlife B and the Great Barrier Reef. More than 3,600 species and subspecies call B.C. home. Unfortunately, B.C. has already lost dozens of species to local extinction, and hundreds more risk being eliminated from the province. Poor Protection THE U R G ENT NEED Rich Wildlife, Poor Protection investigates 3,672 native and regularly occurring F OR S TRON G L E G A L PROTE C T I ON terrestrial and freshwater species and subspecies in B.C. This is the first Canadian O F BR I T IS H C O LUM B I A’ S B I OD IV ER SI TY study to report endangerment below the species level. The report concludes that in order to safeguard the province’s unusually abundant biodiversity, the B.C. government must set in place a stronger set of policies to protect species and their habitat, as well as introduce a robust provincial Endangered Species Act. 2211 West 4th Avenue, Suite 219 131 Water Street, Suite 214 Vancouver, BC, Canada V6K 4S2 Vancouver, BC, Canada V6B 4M3 www.davidsuzuki.org www.sierralegal.org A R E P O R T B Y T H E Tel 604.732.4228 Tel 604.685.5618 DAVI D SUZUKI FOUN D ATION Fax 604.732.0752 Fax 604.685.7813 A N D SIERRA LEGA L Printed on 100% post-consumer recycled paper, processed chlorine free Design by Arifin Graham, Alaris Design • Cover illustration by Brenda Guild Rich Wildlife Poor Protection THE URGENT NEED FOR STRONG LEGAL PROTECTION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA’S BIODIVERSITY Rich Wildlife, Poor Protection: The urgent need for strong legal protection of British Columbia’s biodiversity Authors: Faisal Moola, Director of Science, David Suzuki Foundation Devon Page, Staff Lawyer, Sierra Legal Michelle Connolly Lindsay Coulter, Conservation Policy Analyst, David Suzuki Foundation © 2007 David Suzuki Foundation ISBN 1-897375-04-2 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data for this book is available through the National Library of Canada Acknowledgements: Many people provided valuable assistance in preparing this report. -
A CHECKLIST of MONTANA MOSSES (1880–2018) January 3, 2020
A CHECKLIST OF MONTANA MOSSES (1880–2018) January 3, 2020 Joe C. Elliott Conservation Biology Research, Missoula, Montana Andrea K. Pipp Montana Natural Heritage Program, 1515 E Sixth Ave, Helena, Montana 59601 INTRODUCTION Montana has one of the richest recorded moss floras of the western United States (Eckel et al. 1997), even though large areas of the state remain under surveyed. The Flora of North America (FNA) volumes 27 (2007) and 28 (2014) include 1,402 species found in the continental United States, Canada, Greenland, and St. Pierre and Miquelon, of which 508 species have been recorded in Montana. Including varieties and subspecies, Montana has 522 moss taxa. The rich moss flora is due to the habitat and climatic diversity across the state and a long history of bryological exploration that began in the late 1800s. This checklist is a revision to the second preliminary checklist (Elliott 1993), which listed 408 taxa. The substantial increase in the number of moss taxa since 1993 indicates that, as in much of the western United States, our knowledge of the Montana moss flora continues to expand with increased field and herbarium studies. The discovery of mosses in eastern North America appears to be reaching saturation, but this is not true for western North America, where the accumulation of new species has continued to rise steeply over the last three decades (Carter et al. 2016). Another publication titled the “History, Biogeography, and Species of Montana Mosses (1880-2018)” will be published in Volume 36, Issue 2 of Evansia, a peer-reviewed quarterly of The American Bryological and Lichenological Society (2019). -
On the Axillary Hairs of Leptobryum (Meesiaceae
Arctoa (2001) 10: 189-200 ON THE AXILLARY HAIRS OF LEPTOBRYUM (MEESIACEAE, MUSCI) AND SOME OTHER ACROCARPOUS MOSSES Î ÏÀÇÓØÍÛÕ ÂÎËÎÑÊÀÕ LEPTOBRYUM (MEESIACEAE, MUSCI) È ÍÅÊÎÒÎÐÛÕ ÄÐÓÃÈÕ ÂÅÐÕÎÏËÎÄÍÛÕ ÌÕΠVALERIJ I. ZOLOTOV1 & MICHAEL S. IGNATOV1 ÂÀËÅÐÈÉ È. ÇÎËÎÒÎÂ1 È ÌÈÕÀÈË Ñ. ÈÃÍÀÒÎÂ1 Abstract Axillary hairs of 55 species of genera Amblyodon, Aplodon, Aulacomnium, Brachymitrion, Breutelia, Bryobrittonia, Bryum, Catoscopium, Encalypta, Funaria, Leptobryum, Meesia, Mnium, Orthodontium, Orthotrichum, Paludella, Philonotis, Plagiomnium, Plagiopus, Pohlia, Pyrrobryum, Rhodobryum, Rhizomnium, Splachnum, Tayloria, Tetraplodon, Timmia, Ulota, Voitia, Zygodon are described (and illustrated for most of genera). Axillary hair morphol- ogy is in agreement with the placement of Leptobryum in Meesiaceae, a family close to Splachnaceae. Similarity of axillary hairs in Encalyptaceae and Timmiaceae, as well as in Mnium and Rhizomnium is outlined. Ðåçþìå Ïàçóøíûå âîëîñêè 55 âèäîâ èç ðîäîâ Amblyodon, Aplodon, Aulacomnium, Brachymitrion, Breutelia, Bryobrittonia, Bryum, Catoscopium, Encalypta, Funaria, Leptobryum, Meesia, Mnium, Orthodontium, Orthotrichum, Paludells, Philonotis, Plagiomnium, Plagiopus, Pohlia, Pyrrobryum, Rhodobryum, Rhizomnium, Splachnum, Tayloria, Tetraplodon, Timmia, Ulota, Voitia, Zygodon îïèñàíû (è äëÿ áîëüøèíñòâà ðîäîâ òàêæå ïðîèëëþñòðèðîâàíû). Ñòðîåíèå ïàçóøíûõ âîëîñêîâ ñâèäåòåëüñòâóåò â ïîëüçó ïîìåùåíèÿ Leptobryum â Meesiaceae, êîòîðîå ðàññìàòðèâàåòñÿ êàê ðîäñòâåííîå Splachnaceae. Îòìå÷åíî ñõîäñòâî ïàçóøíûõ âîëîñêîâ Encalyptaceae è Timmiaceae, à òàêæå Mnium è Rhizomnium. Recent advances in the analysis of DNA all regional floras). Molecular data removed Lep- sequence data of mosses brought the evidenc- tobryum from Bryaceae, and put it very definite- es that both morphological and molecular data ly in proximity to Meesiaceae, in a rather isolat- lead to the generally identical classification, ed clade, which includes also Splachnaceae (Hed- at least at the level of families and genera.