DOCSLIB.ORG

Participants in Global Strategy Forum 2006-2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Participants in Global Strategy Forum 2006-2012 www.globalstrategyforum.org PARTICIPANTS IN GLOBAL STRATEGY FORUM 2006-2012 Dr Arshin Adib-Moghaddam Professor Michael Clarke Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC MP Lord Ahmed of Rotherham Dr Richard Cockett Hüseyin Gün Dr Shirin Akiner Professor Christopher Coker General the Lord Guthrie of Craigiebank GCB LVO OBE Haider Al Abadi Elbridge Colby Rt Hon William Hague MP HRH Prince Turki Al Faisal Dr Peter Collecott CMG Dr Stefan Halper Dr Chris Alden Gordon Corera Lord Hannay of Chiswick GCMG CH Lord Anderson of Swansea Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles KCMG LVO Brian Hanrahan Professor Christopher Andrew Alastair Crooke Robert Hayes Professor Ali Ansari Sir Richard Dalton KCMG Lindsey Hilsum Oksana Antonenko General Sir Richard Dannatt GCB Professor Rosemary Hollis Rt Hon James Arbuthnot QC MP CBE MC Adam Holloway MP Sir Michael Arthur KCMG Stephen Day CMG Sophie Honey Rt Hon Lord Ashdown of Norton- FW de Klerk sub-Hambdon GCMG KBE PC Rt Hon the Lord Howard of Sir Richard Dearlove KCMG OBE Lympne QC (Michael Howard MP) Dr Maha Azzam The Honourable Alexander Downer Rt Hon the Lord Howell of HE Egemen Bagis Guildford Professor John Dumbrell Minister Falah Mustafa Bakir Dr John Hughes Rt Hon Alan Duncan MP Tony Baldry MP Sir Christopher Hum KCMG Johan Eliasch Gadi Baltiansky Baroness Hussein-Ece Professor the Hon Gareth Evans Dr Mustafa Barghouti AO QC Field Marshal the Rt Hon the Lord Inge KG GCB PC DL William D Barnard Baroness Falkner of Margravine Nigel Inkster CMG Ambassador Denis Bauchard Charles Farr General Sir Mike Jackson GCB Ambassador John Bolton Rt Hon Frank Field MP CBE DSO Sir Tony Brenton KCMG Anthony Fitzherbert Luay Jawad Rt Hon Lord Browne of Ladyton Lorna Fitzsimons Professor Keith Jeffery Jeremy Browne MP Nidal Foqaha Hon Bernard Jenkin MP Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Bruce MP Luke Forsyth Peter Jenkins CMG Alistair Burt MP Rt Hon Dr Liam Fox MP Commodore Steven Jermy Sukey Cameron MBE Rt Hon Lord Fraser of Carmyllie QC General Sir Garry Johnson Rt Hon Sir Menzies Campbell MP Jonathan Freedland Jo Johnson MP Dr Jack Caravelli Professor Sir Lawrence Freedman Sir Emyr Jones Parry GCMG HE Ünal Çeviköz Ambassador Chas W Freeman, Jr Dr Nazmi Jubeh Professor Malcolm Chalmers Antony Froggatt Lady Barbara Judge CBE Dr Knox Chitiyo Jonathan Fryer Dr Ibrahim Kalin Professor James Clad Mike Gapes MP Oliver Kamm Victoria Clark Michael Gove MP Dr Mohan Kaul Jonathan Clarke Sir Jeremy Greenstock GCMG Stephen King 1 www.globalstrategyforum.org Rt Hon the Lord King of The Rt Hon Baroness Neville-Jones George Shire Bridgewater CH DCMG PC Professor Avi Shlaim FBA Baroness Nicholson of Suat Kiniklioglu MP Rt Hon John Spellar MP Winterbourne Dr Andrew F. Krepinevich Mark Spragg Lord Noon MBE of St. John’s Wood Robin Lamb Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope GCB Peter Oborne Donald Lamont OBE ADC Mehmet Ögütçü Rt Hon the Lord Lamont of Lerwick Rory Stewart MP Professor Sir David Omand GCB Sir Stephen Lander Rt Hon Jack Straw MP Brigadier General (retd) Israela Rt Hon Lord Lawson of Blaby Oron Gary Streeter MP Lord Levy Tarek Osman Dr Asher Susser Professor Anatol Lieven Lord Oxburgh of Liverpool Martin Sutherland Sue Lloyd-Roberts Rt Hon Lord Patten of Barnes CH Sir Hilary Synnott KCMG Sir David Logan KCMG Sir David Pepper KCMG HRH Prince El Hassan bin Talal Lord Lothian (Michael Ancram Ambassador Tom Pickering Sir Peter Tapsell MP QC MP) William R Polk Hazhir Teimourian John Lough Hugh Pope Graham Thomas Sir Roderic Lyne KBE CMG Tom Porteous Michael Thomas Sir David Madden KCMG Rajesh Prasad Sir Crispin Tickell GCMG KCVO Bronwen Maddox Gideon Rachman Dr Steve Tsang Rt Hon the Lord Malloch-Brown Bayan Sami Abdul Rahman KCMG PC Lord Tugendhat Rear Admiral Alan Richards Sir David Manning GCMG CVO Sir Harold Walker KCMG Sir David Richmond CMG Phil Marker Lord Wallace of Saltaire Rt Hon Malcolm Rifkind QC MP Dr Nao Matsukata HE Kursad Tuzmen John Roberts Rt Hon Donald C. Mckinnon Andrew Tyrie MP Rt Hon the Lord Robertson of Port Dr Kristian Coates Ulrichsen Nursuna Memecan MP Ellen KT GCMG hon FRSE PC Dr Alan Mendoza Dr Eugene Rogan Rt Hon Baroness Warsi PC Sir Christopher Meyer KCMG Carne Ross Samar Whitticombe Oliver Miles CMG Sadeq Saba Lord Williams of Baglan Andrew Miller MP Professor Philippe Sands QC Andrew Wilson Madeleine Moon MP Ambassador David Satterfield HE Yasar Yakis Chris Mullin MP Mark Sedwill CMG Dr Shamil Yenikeyeff Douglas Murray Dr Farzana Shaikh Dr Carole Nakhle Kamalesh Sharma 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    NOTES Introduction 1. Robert Kagan to George Packer. Cited in Packer’s The Assassin’s Gate: America In Iraq (Faber and Faber, London, 2006): 38. 2. Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neoconservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004): 9. 3. Critiques of the war on terror and its origins include Gary Dorrien, Imperial Designs: Neoconservatism and the New Pax Americana (Routledge, New York and London, 2004); Francis Fukuyama, After the Neocons: America At the Crossroads (Profile Books, London, 2006); Ira Chernus, Monsters to Destroy: The Neoconservative War on Terror and Sin (Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, CO and London, 2006); and Jacob Heilbrunn, They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons (Doubleday, New York, 2008). 4. A report of the PNAC, Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, September 2000: 76. URL: http:// www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf (15 January 2009). 5. On the first generation on Cold War neoconservatives, which has been covered far more extensively than the second, see Gary Dorrien, The Neoconservative Mind: Politics, Culture and the War of Ideology (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1993); Peter Steinfels, The Neoconservatives: The Men Who Are Changing America’s Politics (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1979); Murray Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005); Murray Friedman ed. Commentary in American Life (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 2005); Mark Gerson, The Neoconservative Vision: From the Cold War to the Culture Wars (Madison Books, Lanham MD; New York; Oxford, 1997); and Maria Ryan, “Neoconservative Intellectuals and the Limitations of Governing: The Reagan Administration and the Demise of the Cold War,” Comparative American Studies, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Guardian, Noam Chomsky and the Milosevic Lobby - the Henry Jackson Society Archive 16/09/2014 19:35
    The Guardian, Noam Chomsky and the Milosevic Lobby - The Henry Jackson Society Archive 16/09/2014 19:35 Latest Tweet Please wait while our tweets load. If you can't wait - check out what we've been twittering. MoreShare | ShareShareShareShare Publications Policy Pamphlets & Reports Strategic Briefings Backgrounders Letters Conversations Editorials Policy & Research Areas Regions Britain Greater Europe & Eurasia European Union European Neighbourhood Russia & Eurasia The Americas North America Latin America Middle East & Africa Middle East Africa Asia Pacific East Asia South Asia South East Asia & Australia Themes Democracy & Development Environment & Economy Global Security & Terrorism Transatlantic Relations & Defence Events Future Events file:///Users/markohoare/Desktop/MyFiles/Articles/Current%20affairs/HJS/2006ChomskyMilosevic.webarchive Page 1 of 19 The Guardian, Noam Chomsky and the Milosevic Lobby - The Henry Jackson Society Archive 16/09/2014 19:35 Past Events Campaigns & Projects Affiliated Projects Worldview Global Power Europe YPFP London Greater Surbiton APPG Media Centre Online Shop Recommended Reading Email List Sign up here and keep up to date by joining the HJS mailing list Email Sign up HOME > Policy & Research Areas > Regions > Greater Europe & Eurasia > European Neighbourhood The Guardian, Noam Chomsky and the Milosevic Lobby By Marko Attila Hoare, 4th February 2006 Sometimes facts are stranger than fiction. On 31 October 2005, The Guardian published an interview with Noam Chomsky, prophet of coffee- table anti-imperialism and verbal conjuror extraordinaire, carried out by the journalist Emma Brockes, which was highly embarrassing to him. The interview exposed him as having revisionist views in relation to the Srebrenica massacre, which he described as ‘probably overstated’ and which he has minimised at various times and in various ways.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Think-Tanks, the War on Terror and the Radicalisation Debate
    eCommons@AKU Abdou Filali-Ansary Occasional Paper Series ISMC Series 11-2020 UK Think-Tanks, the War on Terror and the Radicalisation Debate Hadi Enayat Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.aku.edu/uk_ismc_series_ops Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Terrorism Studies Commons Recommended Citation Enayat, Hadi, "UK Think-Tanks, the War on Terror and the Radicalisation Debate" (2020). Abdou Filali- Ansary Occasional Paper Series. Book 4. https://ecommons.aku.edu/uk_ismc_series_ops/4 ABDOU FILALI-ANSARY OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES UK Think-Tanks, the War on Terror and the Radicalisation Debate Hadi Enayat OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 4 NOVEMBER 2020 I S S N 2 6 3 3 - 8890 Abdou Filali-Ansary Occasional Paper Series In this Series we publish progressive, innovative research to generate discussion and contribute to the advancement of knowledge. The papers represent work from affiliated faculty, fellows, researchers, and doctoral students across a wide range of research areas, demonstrating both the depth and breadth of research being undertaken at the Institute. We also offer the opportunity for our Masters students who have won the best thesis award to publish an abridged version of their thesis with us. We welcome submissions from external researchers that address current AKU-ISMC research priorities. The views expressed in the Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of AKU-ISMC. Although Occasional Papers are not formally peer reviewed, they are thoroughly researched and are reviewed by members of our research team.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliability of Wikipedia 1 Reliability of Wikipedia
    Reliability of Wikipedia 1 Reliability of Wikipedia The reliability of Wikipedia (primarily of the English language version), compared to other encyclopedias and more specialized sources, is assessed in many ways, including statistically, through comparative review, analysis of the historical patterns, and strengths and weaknesses inherent in the editing process unique to Wikipedia. [1] Because Wikipedia is open to anonymous and collaborative editing, assessments of its Vandalism of a Wikipedia article reliability usually include examinations of how quickly false or misleading information is removed. An early study conducted by IBM researchers in 2003—two years following Wikipedia's establishment—found that "vandalism is usually repaired extremely quickly — so quickly that most users will never see its effects"[2] and concluded that Wikipedia had "surprisingly effective self-healing capabilities".[3] A 2007 peer-reviewed study stated that "42% of damage is repaired almost immediately... Nonetheless, there are still hundreds of millions of damaged views."[4] Several studies have been done to assess the reliability of Wikipedia. A notable early study in the journal Nature suggested that in 2005, Wikipedia scientific articles came close to the level of accuracy in Encyclopædia Britannica and had a similar rate of "serious errors".[5] This study was disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica.[6] By 2010 reviewers in medical and scientific fields such as toxicology, cancer research and drug information reviewing Wikipedia against professional and peer-reviewed sources found that Wikipedia's depth and coverage were of a very high standard, often comparable in coverage to physician databases and considerably better than well known reputable national media outlets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Henry Jackson Society and the Degeneration of British
    Tom Griffin Hilary Aked David Miller Sarah Marusek THE HENRY JACKSON SOCIETY AND THE DEGENERATION JUNE 2015 OF BRITISH NEOCONSERVATISM: LIBERAL INTERVENTIONISM, ISLAMOPHOBIA AND THE ‘WAR ON TERROR’ Sponsored by: ISBN 978-0-9570274-4-2 AUTHOR PROFILES David Miller is Professor of Sociology in the Department of Social and Policy Sciences at the University of Bath. He is an RCUK Global Uncertainties Leader- ship Fellow (2013-15) conducting Tom Griffin is a freelance writer and a project to examine the construc- researcher and a doctoral candidate tion, use and impact of expertise on at the University of Bath. He is a ‘terrorism’. He has written widely on contributing editor of OpenDemoc- propaganda, spin and lobbying and racy’s OurKingdom blog and writes for was co-founder of Public Interest Investigations a non profit Spinwatch. He is a former executive company of which Spinwatch and Powerbase are projects. editor and political correspondent of Recent publications include: A Century of Spin: How Public the Irish World. Relations Became the Cutting Edge of Corporate Power (Pluto Press, 2008, co-author); Neoliberal Scotland (Cam- bridge Scholars, 2010, co-editor); Critical Terrorism Studies Dr Sarah Marusek is a freelance since 11 September 2001. What has been learned? (Rout- researcher and writer. She has a PhD in ledge, 2014, co-editor). Researching the Powerful: Public social science from the Maxwell School Sociology in Action (Routledge, forthcoming, co-editor). of Syracuse University. Her doctoral research focused on Islamic activism in Lebanon and was funded by the gener- Hilary Aked is a freelance researcher ous support of the Mellon Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme 2021 Thank You to Our Partners and Supporters
    8–17 October 2021 cheltenhamfestivals.com/ literature #cheltlitfest PROGRAMME 2021 THANK YOU TO OUR PARTNERS AND SUPPORTERS Title Partner Festival Partners The Times and The Sunday Times Australia High Commission Supported by: the Australian Government and the British Council as part of the UK/Australia Season 2021-22 Principal Partners BPE Solicitors Arts Council England Cheltenham BID Baillie Gifford Creative New Zealand Bupa Creative Scotland Bupa Foundation Culture Ireland Costa Coffee Dutch Foundation For Literature Cunard Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands Sky Arts Goethe Institut Thirty Percy Hotel Du Vin Waterstones Marquee TV Woodland Trust Modern Culture The Oldham Foundation Penney Financial Partners Major Partners Peters Rathbones Folio Prize The Daffodil T. S. Eliot Foundation Dean Close School T. S. Eliot Prize Mira Showers University Of Gloucestershire Pegasus Unwin Charitable Trust St. James’s Place Foundation Willans LLP Trusts and Societies The Booker Prize Foundation CLiPPA – The CLPE Poetry Award CLPE (Centre for Literacy in Primary Education) Icelandic Literature Center Institut Francais Japan Foundation Keats-Shelley Memorial Association The Peter Stormonth Darling Charitable Trust Media Partners Cotswold Life SoGlos In-Kind Partners The Cheltenham Trust Queen’s Hotel 2 The warmest of welcomes to The Times and The Sunday Times Cheltenham Literature Festival 2021! We are thrilled and delighted to be back in our vibrant tented Festival Village in the heart of this beautiful spa town. Back at full strength, our packed programme for all ages is a 10-day celebration of the written word in all its glorious variety – from the best new novels to incisive journalism, brilliant memoir, hilarious comedy, provocative spoken word and much more.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad Daniel Ortner
    Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy Volume 12 | Issue 1 Article 1 Winter 2016 The eT rrorist's Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad Daniel Ortner Recommended Citation Daniel Ortner, The Terrorist's Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad, 12 Nw. J. L. & Soc. Pol'y. 1 (2016). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol12/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2016 by Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law Vol. 12, Issue 1 (2016) Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy The Terrorist’s Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad Daniel Ortner1 I. INTRODUCTION On Wednesday, January 7, 2015, armed gunmen entered the offices of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and killed employees and editors of the magazine in probable retaliation for the publication of satirical cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad.2 The attack on Charlie Hebdo has contributed to the debate over whether publication of speech that is likely to provoke violent reactions from religious extremists should be permissible.3 Some have argued that such speech should be prohibited in order to prevent responsive violence and terrorism.4 Recently, a school of journalism dean argued in USA Today that the publication of cartoons that insult the Prophet Muhammad 1 Daniel Ortner, J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
    A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://eprints.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX ‘Is It Good for the Jews?’ Jewish Intellectuals and the Formative Years of Neoconservatism, 1945-1980 Nadja A. Janssen SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Field of American History, Literature and Social Studies Brighton, United Kingdom 11 January 2010 For my family Acknowledgements ! This work would not have been possible without the unflinching support, patient encouragement and constructive advice of Clive Webb and Jarod Roll. My gratitude also goes to Margaret Reynolds and Alun Howkins at the Postgraduate Centre of the School of Humanities for their alacrity in arranging financial assistance for research trips and conferences and to the American Studies Department for the provision of continued teaching throughout the past four years. Furthermore, I wish to thank the Sir Richard Stapley Educational Trust, whose funding enabled me to visit archives in the United States. I wish to express my gratitude to the following librarians for their excellent advice and help: Adina Anflick at the American Jewish Historical Society, Roberta Saltzman and her amiable colleagues at the Dorot Jewish Division of the New York Public Library, and Jennifer Brathovde and her teammates at the Manuscript Division Library of Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive Foreign Policy After Blair a Democratiya Symposium
    Progressive Foreign Policy after Blair A Democratiya Symposium Notes on the Participants Alan Johnson is the editor of Democratiya. He is also a founder member of Labour Friends of Iraq and co-author of the Euston Manifesto. Since 2003 he has supported the work of Iraqi democrats. With Abdullah Muhsin of the Iraqi Workers Federation he wrote Hadi Never Died: Hadi Saleh and the Iraqi Unions (Trades Union Congress, 2006). John Bew is a Research Fellow of Peterhouse at the University of Cambridge and the Vice-President of the Henry Jackson Society. He is co-author of The British Moment: The Case for Democratic Geo-Politics in the Twenty First Century (Henry Jackson Society / Social Affairs Unit). David Clark is a freelance political writer and analyst. He previously worked for the late Robin Cook MP, joining his staff in 1994 and serving as his special adviser on Europe at the Foreign Office from 1997-2001. From 1991-94 he worked as a research assistant to John Reid MP. David is also chairman of the Russia Foundation and a senior research fellow at the Federal Trust, where he is coordinating a project entitled A Global Strategy for Europe. Isabel Hilton is the editor of openDemocracy. She is a journalist, broadcaster, writer and commentator and has worked for and contributed to a wide range of international media, including The Guardian, The Financial Times, The Independent, The Sunday Times, The Economist, The New Yorker, The New York Times, Granta and the BBC. She has reported extensively from Latin America, South Asia, China, Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Criticism of Wikipedia from Wikipidia.Pdf
    Criticism of Wikipedia from Wikipidia For a list of criticisms of Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Criticisms. See also Wikipedia:Replies to common objections. Two radically different versions of a Wikipedia biography, presented to the public within days of each other: Wikipedia's susceptibility to edit wars and bias is one of the issues raised by Wikipedia critics http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Criticism%20of%20Wikipedia%20from%20Wikipidia.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Examples%20of%20Bias%20in%20Wikipedia.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Wikipedia%20is%20Run%20by%20Latent%20Homosexual%20Homophob ics.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Bigotry%20and%20Bias%20in%20Wikipedia.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Dear%20Wikipedia%20on%20Libelous%20lies%20against%20Desire%20 Dubounet.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Desir%c3%a9%20Dubounet%20Wikipidia%20text.pdf Criticism of Wikipedia—of the content, procedures, and operations, and of the Wikipedia community—covers many subjects, topics, and themes about the nature of Wikipedia as an open source encyclopedia of subject entries that almost anyone can edit. Wikipedia has been criticized for the uneven handling, acceptance, and retention of articles about controversial subjects. The principal concerns of the critics are the factual reliability of the content; the readability of the prose; and a clear article layout; the existence of systemic bias; of gender bias; and of racial bias among the editorial community that is Wikipedia. Further concerns are that the organization allows the participation of anonymous editors (leading to editorial vandalism); the existence of social stratification (allowing cliques); and over-complicated rules (allowing editorial quarrels), which conditions permit the misuse of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is described as unreliable at times.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing the Nazi Card Cover A4 Q7:Layout 1
    Understanding and Addressing The ‘Nazi card’ Intervening Against Antisemitic Discourse Paul Iganski and Abe Sweiry STATEMENT OF PURPOSE The European Institute for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism (EISCA) was established in 2007 as an independent think-tank to examine the growth and development of antisemitism in the world today and to explore new strategies for countering this age- old hatred in all its forms. EISCA is founded on the principle that the key to addressing antisemitism in the 21st century comes from a knowledge of its origins, a grasp of its history and a recognition of its changing shape and centrality when analysing racial hatred and contemporary prejudice. In addition to carrying out original research, EISCA provides a network to the most comprehensive scholarship in the field and a blog (www.eisca.eu) devoted to monitoring and examining the discourse of antisemitism in the written, visual and electronic media. Board of Directors Rt Hon Denis MacShane MP (Chairman) Jon Benjamin Jeremy Newmark Patrons Lord Carey Chief Rabbi Sir Jonathan Sacks Sir Sigmund Sternberg Lord Weidenfeld Advisory Board Jessica Asato Professor Brian Brivati Professor Vernon Bogdanor Adrian Cohen Janet Daley Lord Dholakia Daniel Finkelstein Rokhsana Fiaz Dean Godson Michael Gove MP Tom Gross Dr David Hirsh Anthony Julius Oliver Kamm Dominic Lawson Maureen Lipman Charles Moore Fiyaz Mughal Rt Hon Jim Murphy MP Douglas Murray Dr Peter Neumann Dr Emanuele Ottolenghi Geoffrey Paul Stephen Pollard Baroness Margaret Prosser Baroness Meta Ramsay Sir
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipédia, Outil De Calomnie Et De Mensonge Pour Ses Parties
    Pour simplifier l’accès aux savoirs SCIENTIFIQUES ET HISTORIQUE, Wikipédia est un outil pédagogique souvent très utile, évidemment ; mais dans les domaines POLITIQUES ET ÉCONOMIQUES, où les voleurs de pouvoir (et les voleurs tout court, comme les industriels et les banquiers) ont beaucoup à gagner ou à perdre — et où il y a donc de puissantes raisons pour mentir —, Wikipédia est un outil de manipulation et de mensonge, exactement comme les autres médias achetés par les riches pour désinformer les citoyens, en discréditant fallacieusement les opposants et en flattant pernicieusement les dominants. Pour preuve, par exemple, l’article passionnant ci-dessous, de Craig Murray. C’est ainsi que ma propre page Wikipédia est progressivement devenue un outil de calomnie malveillante chimiquement pure — avec interdiction de m’y défendre moi-même… Étienne. Est-ce que le fait d’être libre n’offre pas forcément l’objet libre aux plus riches (le privant rapidement de réelle liberté) ? L’Affaire Philip Cross par Craig Murray [Trad.] 23/05/201826/05/2018 FLAVIEN REHAUT Note Soverain : Cet article de Craig Murray met en évidence les liens entre Wikipédia, généralement réputée pour être une encyclopédie libre et participative (et donc une référence dans le domaine de l’information), et la manière dont elle est utilisée à des fins (géo)politiques avec la complicité supposée de son fondateur et de certains rédacteurs. Cet article traite de l’affaire « Philip Cross », un utilisateur de Wikipédia qui a un grand nombre de révisions à son actif, toutes en faveur des médias néo-conservateurs britanniques et en défaveur des médias indépendants et alternatifs.
    [Show full text]