Department of Defense Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department of Defense Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2015 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 26, 2014 U.S. SENATE, SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met at 10 a.m., in room SD–106, Dirksen Sen- ate Office Building, Hon. Richard J. Durbin (chairman) presiding. Present: Senators Durbin, Mikulski, Cochran, Shelby, Collins, Graham, and Coats. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY STATEMENT OF THE HON. RAY MABUS, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR RICHARD J. DURBIN Senator DURBIN. Good morning. The subcommittee meets this morning to receive testimony on the fiscal year 2015 budget re- quest for the United States Navy and Marine Corps. Pleased to welcome the Secretary of the Navy, the Honorable Ray Mabus; the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), Admiral Jona- than Greenert; the Commander of the Marine Corps, General James Amos; the Chief of the Navy Reserve, Vice Admiral Robin Braun; and the Chief of the Marine Corps Reserve, Lieutenant General Richard Mills. Gentlemen, thank you for being with us today and providing your testimony. At the outset, I would like to speak, I am sure on behalf of the entire committee, and express our condolences to the entire Navy family for the death of a young sailor late Monday night at Naval Station Norfolk, responding to a security breach on a guided missile destroyer, the USS Mahan. During the struggle, the intruder wrestled a gun away from another guard and shot the sailor. Our condolences go out to his family. An investigation is underway. And we look forward to learning more about the incident as soon as possible. For fiscal year 2015, the President’s budget requests $148 billion in base funding for the Department of the Navy. However, the re- quest does not include the Overseas Contingency Operation re- quest, which is a big concern. (1) 2 Until we receive the President’s request for plans in Afghanistan after 2014, it is virtually impossible to understand what is required to support sailors and marines serving in war zones. The Navy is making significant changes to future programs, such as requesting reduction to the number of cruisers, not funding the overhaul of George Washington, and making significant reductions in aircraft ammunitions. This causes serious concern about the Navy and Marine Corps’ ability to execute the shift to the Pacific, along with other responsibilities. In addition, we are concerned as we look across the next 5 years of budgets, as the Department of Defense added $115 billion over the BCA (Budget Control Act) caps written in law. What happens if these funds don’t materialize? Similarly, if funding for education, healthcare, and other domes- tic programs remain at sequester levels, will the Navy and Marine Corps have more challenges in finding well-educated, fit, capable young men and women to recruit? Throughout this conversation, we cannot waver in protecting our most precious asset, our people, whether it is one of the 38,000 new sailors in boot camp at Naval Station Great Lakes in Illinois, which we are very proud of, or a Marine unit rotating through Darwin, Australia. Our men and women in uniform are the finest, most skilled fighting forces in the world, and we can’t allow budget pressures to squander those skills. As the department’s senior leadership, this committee needs your guidance on a number of crucial personnel questions. How can the Navy and Marine Corps recruit and retain the best talent to deal with the challenges of the 21st century? What more can be done to address suicide and PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder)? How do we keep faith with servicemembers and their families in this budget environment? What must we do differently to combat sexual assault? I look forward to working with our distinguished panel through- out the year so that our fiscal year 2015 appropriations bill can en- able the U.S. Navy and the Marine Corps to defend our national interests around the world. We sincerely do appreciate your service to our Nation, and the dedication and sacrifice made every single day by the men and women in our Navy and Marine Corps. I thank you for your testimony this morning. Your full state- ments will be part of the record. Senator DURBIN. I am going to turn to our vice chairman, Sen- ator Cochran, and then to the chairman of the full committee, Sen- ator Mikulski. STATEMENT OF SENATOR THAD COCHRAN Senator COCHRAN. Mr. Chairman, I am pleased to join you in welcoming our distinguished panel of witnesses today. We appre- ciate their leadership. The importance of the Navy and Marine Corps role is becoming even greater with increased presence in the Asia-Pacific region. The department has earned a high level of distinction for its ac- complishments over the years, the Marine Corps, as well. And we 3 are really fortunate to have the kind of leadership that we have now in these important positions. We look forward to hearing your testimony. Thank you. Senator DURBIN. Senator Mikulski. STATEMENT OF SENATOR BARBARA A. MIKULSKI Senator MIKULSKI. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, as you know, I am here as a member of the com- mittee, but as the chair of the full committee, I want the record to note that both Senator Shelby and I are here to support our sub- committee chairman and our vice chairman, Senator Cochran, to show that the Appropriations Committee is committed to keeping America strong, to supporting its United States military, not only with words and what is in the Federal law books, but what to put in the Federal checkbook. We are going to eagerly listen to the tes- timony presented today. And we also want to note that for one member of the panel, it will be his last appearance before Appropriations, with the retire- ment of General Amos. So we want to, in the warmest, most admi- rable way, thank him for his service. We in Maryland are really proud of the Navy and the Marine Corps. We are the home of one of the oldest ships in the Navy, the Constellation, one of the oldest warships, to one of its most modern fleets, the Tenth Fleet, in terms of the cyber-fleet. We are also the home to hallmark institutions within the Navy, from the Naval Academy to the Patuxent River Navy Base. So we are a Navy State, and we look forward to continuing to support you. We, too, want to express our condolences in terms of the terrible shooting at Norfolk. I want to express my condolences to the Navy family, and especially the Naval Academy family, for the death of Will McKamey, a 19-year-old freshman who died in shock trauma of a brain trauma. But as we express our condolences, those young men would want us to make sure we have the best Navy and Marine Corps that we can. We look forward to your testimony, in both what we need in terms of its physical infrastructure, but also building its human capital. So with that, Mr. Chairman, I am eager to hear the testimony. Senator DURBIN. Let’s see if Senator Shelby has any comments he’d like to make. STATEMENT OF SENATOR RICHARD C. SHELBY Senator SHELBY. Mr. Chairman, I would like for my whole state- ment to be made part of the record. And I just want to, again, welcome the Secretary of the Navy and his distinguished colleagues here today. This is a very important hearing. It is important for us to hear on the Appropriations Defense Subcommittee and the full Com- mittee of Appropriations, but it is important to the security of this country at a crucial time. I look forward to all of your testimony and the chance to ask questions. 4 Senator DURBIN. Anyone else wish to make opening comments? Senator Collins. STATEMENT OF SENATOR SUSAN COLLINS Senator COLLINS. Mr. Chairman, in light of the time constraints this morning, I will submit my opening statement for the record. But I just want to welcome all of our witnesses, and note that Vice Admiral Braun is from the great State of Maine. [The statement follows:] PREPARED STATEMENT OF SENATOR SUSAN M. COLLINS Thank you, Chairman Durbin, for holding this hearing to review the Department of Navy’s fiscal year 2015 budget submission. This subcommittee has a number of important decisions to make, but I am hopeful that we can again produce a bipar- tisan funding bill to support our military. Secretary Mabus, General Amos, Admiral Greenert, thank you for appearing here today and please accept my thanks for your decades of collective service to our coun- try. I am generally supportive of many of the provisions in the current budget. For example, I am pleased that the administration continues to fully fund the DDG–51 and DDG–1000 programs which are essential to the future of our surface fleet. That being said, I have some serious concerns about the proposed way forward from a strategic global force standpoint. Our renewed focus on the Asia-Pacific re- gion as an area of the highest strategic interest, as well as instability in other areas of the world, call for maintaining a strong and capable surface fleet. What troubles me, however, is that rather than growing the fleet to keep pace with the threat, we seem to be headed in the opposite direction. In its fiscal year 2014 30-year shipbuilding plan, the Navy laid out its need for 306 battle force ships, a reduction from their previous requirement of 313 battle force ships.
Recommended publications
  • Today's News 18 May 2021
    Today’s News 18 May 2021 (Tuesday) A. NAVY NEWS/COVID NEWS/PHOTOS Title Writer Newspaper Page NIL NIL NIL NIL B. NATIONAL HEADLINES Title Writer Newspaper Page 1 ‘Pandemic response to boost admin bets’ A Romero P Star 1 urged: add more work sectors to jab M Cinco PDI A1 2 Gov’t list C. NATIONAL SECURITY Title Writer Newspaper Page 3 Roque says some Duterte language on A Romero P Star 1 WPS ‘no accurate’ 4 Palace: Nothing to retract in Du30 sea row J Aning PDI A4 remarks 5 Duterte snubbing WPS critics on Enrile’s M Blancaflor D Tribune A1 advice 6 Show of force D Tribune A5 7 Duterte tells US to leave PH alone R Arcilla M Times A4 8 Enrile’s insights on West PH Sea dispute G Kabiling M Bulletin A2 helpful to gov’t- Roque 9 Strategy to enforce the Arbitral Ruling J Lina M Bulletin 5 10 Enrile to Du30: Befriend China J Pañares MST A1 D. INDO-PACIFIC Title Writer Newspaper Page NIL NIL NIL NIL E. AFP RELATED Title Writer Newspaper Page 11 New Army chief assumes post today M Punongbayan P Star 8 F. CPP-NPA-NDF-LCM Title Writer Newspaper Page 12 SC agrees to stop Esperon testimony M Ramos PDI A1 13 NPA committed 1,506 atrocities- AFP official D Reyes M Times A3 NPA committed 1,506 crimes, rights MST 14 A3 violations in past decades 15 28 bomba ng NPA natunton ng militar V Martin Ngayon 9 G. MNLF/MILF/BIFF/ASG Title Writer Newspaper Page A Romero P Star 4 16 ‘Congress OK needed to extend Bangsamoro transition’ 17 3 ASG bandits killed in 2 Basilan clashes L Jocson M Bulletin 8 18 3 ASG men dead in 2 Basilan clashes PNA Tempo 3 19 2 pang BIFF dedo sa sagupaan D Franche Ngayon 9 H.
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Program Guide 2012
    U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 FOREWORD The U.S. Navy is the world’s preeminent cal change continues in the Arab world. Nations like Iran maritime force. Our fleet operates forward every day, and North Korea continue to pursue nuclear capabilities, providing America offshore options to deter conflict and while rising powers are rapidly modernizing their militar- advance our national interests in an era of uncertainty. ies and investing in capabilities to deny freedom of action As it has for more than 200 years, our Navy remains ready on the sea, in the air and in cyberspace. To ensure we are for today’s challenges. Our fleet continues to deliver cred- prepared to meet our missions, I will continue to focus on ible capability for deterrence, sea control, and power pro- my three main priorities: 1) Remain ready to meet current jection to prevent and contain conflict and to fight and challenges, today; 2) Build a relevant and capable future win our nation’s wars. We protect the interconnected sys- force; and 3) Enable and support our Sailors, Navy Civil- tems of trade, information, and security that enable our ians, and their Families. Most importantly, we will ensure nation’s economic prosperity while ensuring operational we do not create a “hollow force” unable to do the mission access for the Joint force to the maritime domain and the due to shortfalls in maintenance, personnel, or training. littorals. These are fiscally challenging times. We will pursue these Our Navy is integral to combat, counter-terrorism, and priorities effectively and efficiently, innovating to maxi- crisis response.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress (name redacted) Specialist in Naval Affairs December 22, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL32665 Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The current and planned size and composition of the Navy, the rate of Navy ship procurement, and the prospective affordability of the Navy’s shipbuilding plans have been oversight matters for the congressional defense committees for many years. The Navy’s proposed FY2018 budget, as amended on May 24, 2017, requests the procurement of nine new ships, including one Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) class aircraft carrier, two Virginia-class attack submarines, two DDG-51 class destroyers, two Littoral Combat Ships (LCSs), one TAO-205 class oiler, and one towing, salvage, and rescue ship. On December 15, 2016, the Navy released a new force-structure goal that calls for achieving and maintaining a fleet of 355 ships of certain types and numbers. Key points about this new 355-ship force-level goal include the following: The 355-ship force-level goal is the result of a Force Structure Assessment (FSA) conducted by the Navy in 2016. The Navy conducts an FSA every few years, as circumstances require, to determine its force-structure goal. The new 355-ship force-level goal replaces a 308-ship force-level goal that the Navy released in March 2015. The actual size of the Navy in recent years has generally been between 270 and 290 ships. The figure of 355 ships appears close to an objective of building toward a fleet of 350 ships that was announced by the Trump campaign organization during the 2016 presidential election campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Example of a Mission Ready Ship Because of a U.S. Navy Port Engineer
    Another example of a mission ready ship because of a U.S. Navy Port Engineer USS Mahan Returns to the Fleet, Completes ESRA Story Number: NNS190925-02Release Date: 9/25/2019 10:19:00 AM By Hendrick L. Dickson, Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center Public Affairs NORFOLK, Va. (NNS) -- The Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Mahan (DDG 72) officially returned to the fleet Sept. 13, after completing an 18-month Chief of Naval Operations availability. Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center (MARMC) provided oversight for the (ESRA) Extended Selected Restricted Availability, which was awarded to Marine Hydraulics International in Norfolk, Virginia, in early 2018. During the availability, the ship received Hull, Mechanical, and Electrical and Combat Systems upgrades to include forward and aft stack replacement, intake preservation, fan room repair and preservation, radar tank level indicators (TLI) alterations, digital fuel control system installations, ballistic missile defense computer program 4.0, vertical launching systems vent modifications, as well as inspections of all tanks. Successfully completing an extended availability is a wide-ranging team effort that involves a number of personnel beyond the prime contractor. The managers, engineers and shipbuilding specialists at MARMC worked closely with the ship’s crew to oversee progress on the availability and to execute a number of intermediate- level maintenance projects required to get the ship back to sea. For more news from Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center, visit www.navy.mil/local/nssa/. Webmaster’s Note: USS Mahan (DDG-72) is an Arleigh Burke- class destroyer currently in service with the United States Navy. She is named for sea power naval theorist Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan USN (1840-1914) and is the fourth Navy ship to bear the name.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Spring 2005 Issue the .SU
    Naval War College Review Volume 58 Article 1 Number 2 Spring 2005 Full Spring 2005 Issue The .SU . Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Naval War College, The .SU . (2005) "Full Spring 2005 Issue," Naval War College Review: Vol. 58 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol58/iss2/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Naval War College: Full Spring 2005 Issue N A V A L W A R C O L L E G E NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW R E V I E W Spring 2005 Volume 58, Number 2 Spring 2005 Spring N ES AV T A A L T W S A D R E C T I O L N L U E E G H E T I VIRIBU OR A S CT MARI VI Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2005 1 Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Naval War College Review, Vol. 58 [2005], No. 2, Art. 1 Cover The Russo-Japanese War of 1904–1905: Russian sailors abandoning a beached warship are rescued by Japanese fisher- men and naval personnel in a painting by Henry Reuterdahl that appeared on the cover of the 17 June 1905 issue of Collier’s magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Military History Anniversaries 1016 Thru 103116
    Military History Anniversaries 16 thru 31 Oct Events in History over the next 15 day period that had U.S. military involvement or impacted in some way on U.S military operations or American interests Oct 16 1780 – American Revolution: Royalton, Vermont and Tunbridge, Vermont are the last major raids of the War. Oct 16 1781 – American Revolution: George Washington captures Yorktown, Virginia after the Siege of Yorktown. Oct 16 1813 – War of 1812: The United States defeats the British Fleet at the Battle of Lake Erie Oct 16 1821 – The schooner Enterprise, commanded by Lawrence Kearny, engages four pirate schooners and one pirate sloop off Cape Antonio, Cuba who are in the act of robbing two American vessels and one British ship. The pirate leader, Capt. Charles Gibbs, escapes to shore but his ship and two others were burned. The remaining ships are sent to Charleston, S.C. as prizes. Oct 16 1821 – Civil War: The Union screw steamer South Carolina captures the schooner Edward Barnard, with a cargo of turpentine on board, at Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. Oct 16 1859 – Abolitionist John Brown leads a small group on a raid against a federal armory in Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now West Virginia), in an attempt to start an armed slave revolt and destroy the institution of slavery. 1 Oct 16 1891 – Two sailors from the cruiser Baltimore are killed and 17 are injured by a mob in Valparaiso, Chile. The incident shifts relations between the United States and Chile. In 1892 Chile pays $75,000 in gold for restitution and apologizes for the incident.
    [Show full text]
  • NAVY-FOIACASELOG-2012.Pdf
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com Department of the Navy Freedom of Information Privacy Program Case Log For Period Report Date: 01/22/2013 01/01/2012 to 12/31/2012 SITE_CODE CASE_NUMBER SUBJECT RECEIVED_DT 1NCD 2012F060001 Preliminary Inquiry 5-Jun-12 1NCD 2012F060002 Preliminary Inquiry 13-Jun-12 1NCD 2012F080004 Documents referenced on Commander, 3NCR 2-Aug-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090002 JAGMAN 17-Jan-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090004 Logbook Pages 6-Feb-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090005 JAGMAN 28-Feb-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090006 JAGMAN 1-Mar-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090007 JAGMAN 12-Mar-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090008 JAGMAN 14-May-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090009 JAGMAN 15-May-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012P090010 JAGMAN 30-May-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090011 F-35B Schedule 20-Jun-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090012 JAGMAN 22-Jun-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090013 JAGMAN 11-Jun-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090014 FRD Document for F-35C 12-Jul-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090015 VMFA-122 Crusaders/Werewolves Docs 20-Aug-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090016 MALS 32 Records 20-Jul-12 2DMAW - Cherry Point 2012F090024
    [Show full text]
  • Uss Norton Sound
    DO YOU KNOW OR REMEMBER? People and Events in the History of Naval Surface Warfare Center, Port Hueneme Gerald L. Roberts NEMESIS Alumni Association Port Hueneme, California Do You Know or Remember People and Events in the History of Naval Surface Warfare Center, Port Hueneme Gerald L. Roberts October 2020 NEMESIS Alumni Association www.nemesisalumni.org P.O. Box 604 Port Hueneme, CA 93044-0604 II Keep the Ships Shooting! - GLR III IV Contents Contents V Forward VII Introduction IX 1: NEMESIS Established 1 2: First AEGIS Ship 3 3: USS NORTON SOUND (Part 1) 5 4: USS NORTON SOUND (Part 2) 7 5: HARPOON IN THE FLEET 9 6: Change of Command 11 7: USS NORTON SOUND (Part 3) 13 8: 3T Reorganization 15 9: USS NORTON SOUND (Part 4) 17 10: TERRIER in Aircraft Carriers 19 11: Captain Robert Walters 21 12: Captain Wayne E. Meyer 23 13: Captain John D. Beecher 25 14: Destroyer Named After Wayne E. Meyer 27 15: USS STARK (FFG-31) 29 16: USS VALLEY FORGE and USS BUNKER HILL 31 17: Highlights of 1974 33 18: Origins: The Early History (Part 1) 35 19: Origins: The Early History (Part 2) 37 20: The Ninth Birthday (1974) 39 21: The Founding Documents 43 22: Underway Replenishment 45 23: Vice Admiral Eli T. Reich 47 24: Wayne E. Meyer 49 25: USS FOX; Harpoon 51 26: Commander Don Pette 53 27: Early History 55 28: Early History (continued) 57 V 29: Early History (continued) 59 30: Vice Admiral Reich’s Speech, 1975 61 31: Vice Admiral Reich’s Speech (continued) 63 32: Message for the Fleet Sailors 65 33: USS OKLAHOMA CITY 67 34: Praise 71 35: Captain David M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Musical Voyage Report of Proceedings on Cessation of Duties of the Royal Australian Navy’S 8Th Director of Music Commander Phillip Charles Anderson Oam Ran
    A MUSICAL VOYAGE REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS ON CESSATION OF DUTIES OF THE ROYAL AUSTRALIAN NAVY’S 8TH DIRECTOR OF MUSIC COMMANDER PHILLIP CHARLES ANDERSON OAM RAN Royal Australian Navy Band: A Musical Voyage A FLAGSHIP RECITAL FOR THE NAVY’S CENTENARY CONCERT 10 JULY 2011 ON STAGE AT THE NANCHANG RADIO AND TELEVISION CENTRE 24 OCTOBER 2011 Design and compilation by: Commander Phillip Anderson OAM RAN Published on 16 January 2012 Copyright © Royal Australian Navy 2012 Royal Australian Navy Band: A Musical Voyage - 1 - CONTENTS page BIOGRAPHY COMMANDER PHILLIP ANDERSON OAM RAN 7 CHAPTER 1 REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS 8 Report of Proceedings on Cessation of Duties 9 of the Royal Australian Navy’s 8th Director of Music, Commander Phillip Anderson OAM RAN CHAPTER 2 ASHORE AND AFLOAT 13 CHAPTER 3 MAJOR BUSINESS PROPOSALS 18 RAN Band Business Plan (2003)—Chapter 1 Analysis 19 Business Case for the Establishment of a Permanent 30 Detachment of the Royal Australian Navy Band in Western Australia Chief of Navy Senior Advisory Committee Submission: 41 Royal Australian Navy Band Deployment to Washington and Pearl Harbor Brief for Deputy Chief of Navy: Proposal to Hold 53 a Series of Naval Tattoos and Concerts Hurt Statement—RAN Band Funded Reserve Commitment (FRC) 70 CHAPTER 4 ESSAYS AND SPEECHES 82 Leadership Essay by the Director of Music 83 Music Leadership Essay by the Director of Music 93 Anzac Day Essay by the Director of Music 94 Remembrance Day Speech by the Director of Music 97 Speech by the Director of Music to the Australian Music 99 Examination Music
    [Show full text]
  • Shelf List 12/12/2013 Matches 6753
    Shelf List 12/12/2013 Matches 6753 Author Title Call# Subject Home Location The Fighting and Sinking of the USS Johnston VA65.J64 1991 BATTLE OFF SAMAR: YAMATO, NAGATO, Lending Library Shelves (DD-557) - Battle Off Samar As Told by her crew KONGO, HURUNA, CHOKAI, KLUMANO, SUZUYA, CHIJUMA, TONE, YAHAGI, NOSHIRO U.S.S. San Diego - Mediterranean Cruise 1982 - VA65.S6 1989 Lending Library Shelves 1983 Glimpses of Australia - Souvenir for the US Navy DU104.G6 1908 United States. Navy --Cruise, 1907-1909. [from old Loan Library Stacks catalog] Australia --Pictorial works. The Bluejackets' Manual US Navy 1927 V113.B55 1927 Loan Library Stacks The Bluejackets' Manual 1943 V113.B55 1943 Loan Library Stacks Helicopter Capital - U.S. Naval Auxiliary Air VG94.R4 1956 Lending Library Shelves Station, Ream Field, Imperial Beach, Ca Bikini Scientific Resurvey, Jul - Sep 1947 QE75 1947 CRUISE Library Research Room (non-lending materials) Fighter Squadron 54 - Korean Cruise 1952-53 VA65.F54 1953 AIR GROUP Lending Library Shelves U.S.S. Alfred A. Cunningham Dd 752 Korean VA65.C752 CRUISE BOOK USS ALFRED A . CUNNINGHAM Cruise Book Shelves Cruise 1951 1951 DD 752 1954 - 1955 Cruise Log of the USS Arnold J. VA65.I869 1955 CRUISE BOOK USS ARNOLD J. ISBELL DD 869 Cruise Book Shelves Isbell Dd 869 U.S.S. Brown DD 546 Wake of the Brown Jun 52 VA65.B546 CRUISE BOOK USS BROWN Cruise Book Shelves - Jan 53 1953 U.S.S. Cleveland Cl 55 - WW II VA65.C55 1946 CRUISE BOOK USS CLEVELAND Cruise Book Shelves U.S.S. Columbia Cl 56: Battle Record and VA65.C56 1945 CRUISE BOOK USS COLUMBIA Lending Library Shelves History 1942 - 45 U.S.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Spring 2007 Issue the .SU
    Naval War College Review Volume 60 Article 1 Number 2 Spring 2007 Full Spring 2007 Issue The .SU . Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Naval War College, The .SU . (2007) "Full Spring 2007 Issue," Naval War College Review: Vol. 60 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol60/iss2/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Naval War College: Full Spring 2007 Issue NAVAL WAR C OLLEGE REVIEW NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW Spring 2007 Volume 60, Number 2 Spring 2007 Spring N ES AV T A A L T W S A D R E C T I O L N L U E E G H E T I VIRIBU OR A S CT MARI VI Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2007 1 Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Naval War College Review, Vol. 60 [2007], No. 2, Art. 1 Cover The “educational continuum.” The Naval War College is a part of a seamless process in the education of naval officers, and others, for leadership in the twenty-first- century security environment. The inter- relationships between its sources (policy and fleet influences), partners (notably the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California, and the Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland), and of course its products, its graduates, are represented here by their arrangement in a toroid-like pattern—denoting continu- ity and suggestive of infinity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Change in Naval Strategy from 1989-1994 A
    Replacing the Maritime Strategy: The Change in Naval Strategy from 1989-1994 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Steven T. Wills April 2017 ©2017 Steven T. Wills. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Replacing the Maritime Strategy: The Change in Naval Strategy from 1989-1994 by STEVEN T. WILLS has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Ingo Trauschweizer Associate Professor of History Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT WILLS, STEVEN T., Ph.D., April 2017, History Replacing the Maritime Strategy: The Change in Naval Strategy from 1989-1994 Director of Dissertation: Ingo Trauschweizer The change in U.S. naval strategy from 1989 to 1994 was the most significant of its kind since the end of the Second World War. The end of the Cold War, the provisions of the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 and the effects of the First Gulf War of 1991 combined to radically alter U.S. and naval strategic thinking. The end of the Cold War brought about a review of U.S. naval strategy, but the personalities involved created a new process that greatly hampered the re-creation of strategy designed to combat peer competitors. The provisions of the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 indirectly affected the Navy staff where strategy documents had heretofore been produced. Talented officers that had sought service on the Navy Staff gravitated instead toward the Joint Staff and regional Commander Staffs as these positions offered better chances for promotion and advancement.
    [Show full text]