DOCSLIB.ORG

Peace Is Living with Dignity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peace Is Living with Dignity PEACE IS LIVING WITH DIGNITY VOICES OF COMMUNITIES FROM MYanmar’s ceasefIRE AREAS IN 2016 PEACE IS LIVING WITH DIGNITY Voices of Communities from Myanmar’s ceasefire areas in 2016 i PEACE IS LIVING WITH DIGNITY Voices of Communities from Myanmar’s ceasefire areas in 2016 Listening methodology development: Soth Plai Ngarm Listening Project Implementation (Training, Processing, Writing) Coordinator and Editor: Karen Simbulan Team members: Laurens Visser, Tengku Shahpur, Harshadeva Amarathunga Myanmar Partner Organisations Karuna Myanmar Social Services (Kachin) Ta’ang Student and Youth Union (Northern Shan) Pyi Nyein Thu Kha (Southern Shan) Karen Development Network (Kayin) Kayah State Peace Monitoring Network (Kayah) Mon Women Network (Mon) Cover photo: Karlos Manlupig Inside photographs: Zabra Yu Siwa, Shutterstock, Listener from Northern Shan Copy-editing: Husnur Esthiwahyu Lay-out: Boonruang Song-ngam Publisher: Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies Funding: Peace Support Fund ISBN- 13: 978 99963 856 4 3 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies (CPCS) is grateful to our Myanmar partner organisations that provided invaluable assistance throughout the project. We could not have done this without you. We are especially grateful to all the individuals who volunteered to be listeners. We appreciate the time, energy and enthusiasm that you demonstrated throughout the process, and your willingness to travel to remote areas. We would also like to express our heartfelt gratitude to the community members from Kachin, Northern Shan, Southern Shan, Kayah, Kayin, and Mon states who were willing to take the time out of their busy lives to share their opinions, experiences, knowledge, concerns and hopes for the future. Thank you for your candour and openness, and for entrusting us with your voices. Lastly, we would like to thank Peace Support Fund, without whose support this publication would not have been possible. iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ........................................................................................ iii List of Tables.................................................................................................... vi List of Maps ................................................................................................... viii Abbreviations and Acronyms ........................................................................ ix CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......................... 1 CHAPTER 2: RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................... 65 CHAPTER 3: LISTENING METHODOLOGY ..................................................... 71 CHAPTER 4: LESSONS FROM LISTENING ....................................................... 87 CHAPTER 5: KACHIN STATE ......................................................................... 93 Key demographics ................................................................................. 101 Main Themes ......................................................................................... 104 CHAPTER 6: NORTHERN SHAN STATE ......................................................... 121 Key demographics ................................................................................. 129 Main Themes ......................................................................................... 132 CHAPTER 7: SOUTHERN SHAN STATE ......................................................... 149 Key demographics .................................................................................. 155 Main Themes ......................................................................................... 158 CHAPTER 8: KAYAH STATE ........................................................................... 169 Key demographics ................................................................................. 175 Main Themes ......................................................................................... 178 CHAPTER 9: KAYIN STATE ............................................................................ 193 Key demographics .................................................................................. 200 Main Themes ......................................................................................... 203 CHAPTER 10: MON STATE .......................................................................... 213 Key demographics .................................................................................. 222 Main Themes ......................................................................................... 225 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Ceasefire groups ...............................................................................2 Table 2. Main themes identified in processing workshops across all areas ...7 Table 3. Kachin State - Main themes from processing workshop ................17 Table 4. Kachin State - Main themes under guide questions .......................19 Table 5. Northern Shan State - Main themes from processing workshop ...26 Table 6. Northern Shan State - Main themes under guide questions ..........28 Table 7. Southern Shan State - Main themes from processing workshop ...33 Table 8. Southern Shan State - Main themes under guide questions ..........35 Table 11. Kayin State - Main themes from processing workshop ................49 Table 12. Kayin State - Main themes under guide questions .......................51 Table 13. Mon State - Main themes from the processing workshop ...........56 Table 14. Mon State - Main themes under guide questions ........................59 Table 15. List of Partner Organisations ........................................................74 Table 16. Gender of listeners .......................................................................74 Table 17. Guide questions ............................................................................76 Table 18. Locations covered and number of participants ............................79 Table 19. Gender of participants ..................................................................79 Table 20. Ethnicity of participants ................................................................80 Table 21. Age range of participants ..............................................................81 Table 22. Educational background of participants .......................................81 Table 23. Livelihood of participants .............................................................82 Table 24. Religion of participants .................................................................83 Table 25. Gender of participants ................................................................101 Table 26. Ethnicity of participants ..............................................................101 vi Table 27. Age range of participants ............................................................102 Table 28. Education background of participants ........................................102 Table 29. Livelihood of participants ...........................................................103 Table 30. Ethnicity of participants ..............................................................129 Table 31. Age range of participants ............................................................130 Table 32. Livelihood of participants ...........................................................131 Table 33. Gender of participants ................................................................155 Table 34. Ethnicity of participants ..............................................................155 Table 35. Age range of participants ............................................................156 Table 36. Educational background of participants .....................................156 Table 37. Livelihood of participants ...........................................................157 Table 38. Gender of participants ................................................................175 Table 39. Ethnicity of participants ..............................................................175 Table 40. Age range of participants ............................................................176 Table 41. Education background of participants ........................................176 Table 42. Religion of participants ...............................................................177 Table 43. Livelihood of participants ...........................................................177 Table 44. Gender of participants ................................................................200 Table 45. Ethnicity of participants ..............................................................200 Table 46. Religion of participants ...............................................................201 Table 47. Age Range of participants ...........................................................201 Table 48. Livelihood of participants ...........................................................202 Table 49. Gender of participants ................................................................222 Table 50. Ethnicity of participants ..............................................................222 Table 51. Age range of participants ............................................................223 Table 52. Education background of participants ........................................223 Table 53. Livelihood of participants ...........................................................224 vii LIST OF MAPS Map of Myanmar .............................................................................................6
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Weekly Briefing Note Southeastern Myanmar 5-11 June 2021 (Limited Distribution)
    Weekly Briefing Note Southeastern Myanmar 5-11 June 2021 (Limited Distribution) This weekly briefing note, covering humanitarian developments in Southeastern Myanmar from 5 June to 11 June, is produced by the Kayin Inter-Agency Coordination of the Southeastern Myanmar Working Group. Highlights • The import of soap, detergent and toothpaste from Thailand through the Myawaddy border was suspended on 4 June, according to a letter of notification from the Trades Department.1 • In Kayin State, clashes between the Tatmadaw and Karen National Union (KNU) was observed in Kyainseikgyi, Hpapun and Myawaddy townships and Thandaung town during the week. • A letter ordering the suspension of activities and temporary closure of offices of INGOs in Tanintharyi Region was issued by the Department of Social Welfare on 2 June. The closure of INGOs offices is likely to impact access to services and assistance by vulnerable people in the region. • The Karen National Liberation Army's (KNLA) Chief, General Saw Johny released a statement on 9 June, indicating that the KNLA and its members will follow political leadership of the Karen National Union (KNU). According to the statement signed by Gen. Saw Johny, the KNLA will follow the announcement that was released by the KNU's chairman Saw Mutu Say Poe on 10 May and will follow the framework of the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) signed by the KNU. The statement also stated that KNLA members must comply with the military rules of the KNLA.2 • The security situation continues to deteriorate in Kayah State. Over 100,000 remain displaced as clashes and military reinforcements brought in by the Tatmadaw continued throughout the week.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of the Union of Myanmar Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation Forest Department
    Leaflet No. 24 The Republic of the Union of Myanmar Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation Forest Department Assessing different livelihood of the local people and causes of forest degradation and deforestation in the Kayah State Dr. Chaw Chaw Sein, Staff Officer Dr. Thaung Naing Oo, Director Kyi Phyu Aung, Range Officer Forest Research Institute December, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS i Abstract ii 1 Introduction 1 2 Objectives 2 3 Literature Review 2 3.1 What do we mean by sustainable livelihoods? 2 3.2 Why are sustainable livelihoods important for conservation? 3 3.3 How do we identify locally appropriate livelihoods strategies? 3 4 Material and Method 5 4.1 Study Area 5 4.2 Data collection and analysis 6 5 Results and Discussion 6 5.1 Livelihood surveys in the Kayah Region 6 5.2 Causes of forest degradation and deforestation in the study area 12 6 Conclusions and Recommendation 15 7 Acknowledgements 17 8 References 18 ၊ ၊ ၊ ၊ ၁.၄% Assessing different livelihood of the local people and causes of forest degradation and deforestation in the Kayah State Dr. Chaw ChawSein, Staff Officer Dr. Thaung Naing Oo, Director Thein Saung, Staff Officer Kyi Phyu Aung , Range Officer Abstract About annual rate of 1.4% of the forest degradation and deforestation was occurred in Myanmar. There are many causes of deforestation and forest degradation. Especially in the hilly region like Kayah state, the main causes of forest degradation and deforestation are due to shifting cultivation. The present study reports different livelihood activities to settle their daily needs in the Kayah areas and the causes of forest degradation and deforestation.
    [Show full text]
  • Yangon University of Economics Master of Development Studies Programme
    YANGON UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS MASTER OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES PROGRAMME A STUDY ON THE COMMUNITY-BASED TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN KAYAH STATE THET MON SOE EMDevS – 43 (15TH BATCH) DECEMBER, 2019 YANGON UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS MASTER OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES PROGRAMME A STUDY ON THE COMMUNITY-BASED TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN KAYAH STATE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Development Studies (MDevS) Supervised by: Submitted by: Daw Yin Myo Oo Thet Mon Soe Associate Professor Roll No. 43 Department of Economics EMDevS (15th Batch) Yangon University of Economics 2017-2019 December, 2019 YANGON UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS MASTER OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES PROGRAMME This is to certify that the thesis entitled “A Study on the Community-Based Tourism Development in Kayah State”, submitted as a partial fulfillment towards the requirements for the degree of Master of Development Studies had been accepted by the Board of Examiners. BOARD OF EXAMINERS 1. Dr. Tin Win Rector Yangon University of Economics (Chief Examiner) 2. Dr. Ni Lar Myint Htoo Pro-Rector Yangon University of Economics (Examiner) 3. Dr. Cho Cho Thein Professor and Head Department of Economics Yangon University of Economics (Examiner) 4. Daw Nyunt Nyunt Shwe Professor and Head (Retired) Department of Applied Economics Yangon University of Economics (Examiner) 5. Dr. Tha Pye Nyo Professor Department of Economics Yangon University of Economics (Examiner) December, 2019 ABSTRACT Community-Based Tourism (CBT) is gaining prestige in developing countries as an alternative to mass tourism. The main approach of CBT is to ensure environmental, social and cultural sustainability while empowering the local community.
    [Show full text]
  • Raising the Curtain
    Raising the Curtain Cultural Norms, Social Practices and Gender Equality in Myanmar 1 We, both women and men, hold equal opportunities and chances since we were born, as we all are, human beings. Most women think that these opportunities and favours are given by men. No, these are our own opportunities and chances to live equally and there is no need to thank men for what they are not doing. Focus Group Discussion with Muslim women, aged 18-25, Mingalartaung Nyunt Township The Gender Equality Network Yangon, Myanmar © All rights reserved Published in Yangon, Myanmar, Gender Equality November 2015 Network 2 Cultural Norms, Social Practices and Gender Equality in Myanmar 3 Contents Acronyms 6 Acknowledgements 7 Executive Summary 8 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Background and Rationale 12 1.2 Objectives and Study Questions 12 1.3 Methodology - In Brief 13 2. Setting the Scene 16 2.1 ‘The Problem is that the Problem is not Seen as a Problem’ 17 2.2 Historical Narratives: Women’s High Status and Comparisons with Other Countries 18 2.3 Gender Inequality and Gender Discrimination: Where is the Problem? 21 2.4 Gender Equality as a ‘Western’ Concept 25 3. Cultural and Religious Norms and Practices 26 3.1 Culture in Myanmar, and Myanmar Culture 27 3.2 The Inseparability of Culture and Religion 29 3.3 Women as Bearers of Culture 30 3.4 The Role of Nuns in Buddhism 32 3.5 Hpon, Respect and Male Superiority 34 3.6 Purity, Female Inferiority and Exclusion 37 3.7 Modesty, Male Sexuality and the Importance of Women’s Dress 38 3.8 The Construction of Ideal Masculinity 41 3.9 Letting the Birds Rest on the Pagoda: Controlling the Self, Enduring Hardship and Sacrificing 42 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Rights Abuses in Burma Exposed
    Gaining Ground: Earth Rights Abuses in Burma Exposed Earth Rights School of Burma Class of 2008 Preface People can create a better world if they have the desire, enthusiasm and knowledge to do so. Furthermore, unity of thought and unity of action are needed in the international community to bring about positive changes and sustainable development around the globe. In a long list of important goals, eradication of poverty and protection and promotion of human rights and environmental rights are top priorities. People power is pivotal and improving the connections among individuals, organizations and governments is essential. Greater knowledge is important at every level and every actor in the international community must strive to create a better world in the future. Of course, this improvement would come from both local and global actions. In fact, to my knowledge, the students and EarthRights School (ERS) itself are trying their best to cooperate and to coordinate with the international community for the above-mentioned noble tasks. By starting from localized actions, many ethnic youths from various areas of Burma come, study and have been working together at ERS. They exchange their experiences and promote knowledge and expertise not only during their school term but also after they graduate and through practical work that improves society. In Burma, according to the international communitys highly-regarded research and field documents, human rights violations are rampant, poverty is too high, environmental issues are neglected and good governance is non-existent. This may be a normal situation under military dictatorships around the world but it is not a permanent situation and history has proved that if democratic people have enough power, things will change sooner or later.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Evaluation Multi-Stakeholder Model for Ending Gender-Based Violence Project Kayah March 2010 Evaluators: Raquel Fernandez Costa, Zin Mar Tun, Sofia Raineri
    Final Evaluation Multi-stakeholder Model for Ending Gender-Based Violence Project Kayah March 2010 Evaluators: Raquel Fernandez Costa, Zin Mar Tun, Sofia Raineri Table of Contents 1. List of acronyms ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. Charts and tables ........................................................................................................................ 3 3. Executive summary and recommendations ............................................................................. 4 4. Introduction and background .................................................................................................... 5 4.1. Project Overview ................................................................................................................. 6 4.2. Purpose and scope of the evaluation ............................................................................... 7 5. Methodology and limitations ..................................................................................................... 7 5.1. Quantitative Methodology .................................................................................................. 7 5.2. Qualitative data ................................................................................................................... 9 5.3. Limitations to the Evaluation ............................................................................................. 9 6. Evaluation findings ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Led Development in Kayah: Challenges and Lessons from Collective Community Leadership
    COMMUNITY-LED DEVELOPMENT IN KAYAH: CHALLENGES AND LESSONS FROM COLLECTIVE COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP RESEARCH PAPER – OCTOBER 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The lead researchers and the research team would like to thank to everyone who contributed to this study. We acknowledge the time given by Lireh Angelo, U Saw Eh Dah, U Nan Ree, U Ree Reh, Ma Marina, Ma Tarmalar (Local Development Network Senior Management Team) and all LDN staff that participated in the research. We also would like to thank the Village Tract Community Based Organisation (VTCBO) members, community members, village administrators, village tract administrators and village tract clerks from 22 village tracts in Demoso and Hpruso townships. In ActionAid Myanmar, we would like to thank the Uplands Team, in particular Lin Yaung Oo and Hnin Su. Also, thanks to James Gabriel from AAM Programme Quality team. We appreciate the financial contribution made by ActionAid Myanmar’s donor for making this research possible. Lead Researcher Editors Ran Lunn Aung and Nang K Thwe Charles David Crumpton The Bridge Research and Consultancy Co., Ltd Mariana Cifuentes Research Team and Contributors Copyeditor Moses Phyareh Paul Taylor Htay Khine Shin Lay Reh Photographer Let Let Lin Zin Mar Nnin Naw Lay Lay Phaw Saw Eh Dah Pint Ree Let Let Lin Phu Maw Hse Lae Saw Nay Thaw Cover Photo Sai Myar Discussion about child rights in community Soe Reh (education project) in Law Plyar Leh village, Hpruso township in 2018. ABOUT THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT NETWORK In 2012, the Local Development Network (LDN) in Kayah State started with the support given by Metta, ActionAid Myanmar and Shalom Nyein Foundation’s Fellowship program.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF, 140.93
    Flash Update #6 Developments in Southeast Myanmar 25 May 2021 (Limited Distribution) Major Developments and Security Incidents A resurgence of armed conflict involving several armed actors took place over the weekend in Kayah State, near the border with Shan State. On the morning of Thursday, 20 May 2021, clashes between the Myanmar Armed Forces (MAF) and the Karenni Army, the armed wing of the Karenni National Progressive Party (KNPP) in Bawlakhe and Hpaswang townships took place after troops attempted to enter the KNPP’s territory which resulted in the displacement of some villagers in the region.1 On the same day, four civilians and four striking civil servants at a funeral were arrested by security forces in Demoso town. As many as 13 people were thought to have been arrested on that day.2 When talks over their release failed, the Karenni People’s Defense Force (KPDF), formed by civilian resistance fighters, launched attacks on security forces the next day.3 By the evening of Friday, 21 May 2021, the KPDF announced it had attacked and seized several military security checkpoints and outposts in Demoso and Bawlakhe townships with the help of a local ethnic armed organization (EAO).4 Though the EAO was not identified, it is believed to be the Karenni Army which is active in the region.5 Clashes were reported in at least in five locations within Demoso Township, including Daungankha, Myo Ma, Si Pin, Sa Pya Chauk Mine and Marnarplaw. According to reports, indiscriminate mortar shelling by security forces was used as the MAF sent in reinforcements following the clashes.6 In addition, there have been reports of the Border Guard Forces (BGF) mobilizing in western Demoso and roads entering to Kayah being blocked by the KPDF.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Is Living with Dignity
    PEACE IS LIVING WITH DIGNITY VOICES OF COMMUNITIES FROM MYanmar’s ceasefIRE AREAS IN 2016 PEACE IS LIVING WITH DIGNITY Voices of Communities from Myanmar’s ceasefire areas in 2016 i PEACE IS LIVING WITH DIGNITY Voices of Communities from Myanmar’s ceasefire areas in 2016 Listening methodology development: Soth Plai Ngarm Listening Project Implementation (Training, Processing, Writing) Coordinator and Editor: Karen Simbulan Team members: Laurens Visser, Tengku Shahpur, Harshadeva Amarathunga Myanmar Partner Organisations Karuna Myanmar Social Services (Kachin) Ta’ang Student and Youth Union (Northern Shan) Pyi Nyein Thu Kha (Southern Shan) Karen Development Network (Kayin) Kayah State Peace Monitoring Network (Kayah) Mon Women Network (Mon) Cover photo: Karlos Manlupig Inside photographs: Zabra Yu Siwa, Shutterstock, Listener from Northern Shan Copy-editing: Husnur Esthiwahyu Lay-out: Boonruang Song-ngam Publisher: Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies Funding: Peace Support Fund ISBN- 13: 978 99963 856 4 3 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies (CPCS) is grateful to our Myanmar partner organisations that provided invaluable assistance throughout the project. We could not have done this without you. We are especially grateful to all the individuals who volunteered to be listeners. We appreciate the time, energy and enthusiasm that you demonstrated throughout the process, and your willingness to travel to remote areas. We would also like to express our heartfelt gratitude to the community members from Kachin, Northern Shan, Southern Shan, Kayah, Kayin, and Mon states who were willing to take the time out of their busy lives to share their opinions, experiences, knowledge, concerns and hopes for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Analysis for Rural Livelihoods in Kayah State an Independent Review Conducted by Sam Cartmell and Commissioned by the Border Consortium
    Market Analysis for Rural Livelihoods in Kayah State An independent review conducted by Sam Cartmell and commissioned by The Border Consortium This research was conducted with funding from the Australian Government’s Gender Action Platform as part of a project led by Act for Peace. The “I’m prepared” project promotes gender equity, economic empowerment and refugee protection during return and reintegration processes from Thailand to Myanmar and from India to Sri Lanka. 1 Contents Executive Summary and Recommendations ............................................................................................ 2 1.0 Introduction and Contextual analysis ..................................................................................................... 6 Kayah state profile .................................................................................................................................... 7 Township profiles .................................................................................................................................... 10 Kayah state labor market trends ............................................................................................................ 13 Land dynamics......................................................................................................................................... 14 Conflict dynamics .................................................................................................................................... 16 2.0 Market analysis and value chain
    [Show full text]
  • Township Level Context Assessment and Trends
    Township Level Context Assessment and Trends Loikaw Township Community perceptions of governance Weak governance, political vacuum: Good governance and accountability to the public (The rule of law) tends to be weak in Loikaw Township as there are numerous grey areas in terms of governance. The two authorities tend to play politics by deferring unpopular decisions and blocking developments from the other side. Even within government controlled areas, the lack of responsiveness or ‘ownership’ causes frustration among the community when they want to report a problem or a dispute to the proper authority, only to be passed from department to department indefinitely. For example, one village tract reported that despite having the hydropower plant in their community, approximately 50% of the households still lack electricity supply. When community leaders reported this discrepancy to the state ministry they were asked to report instead to the state office, which in turn referred them to the state ministry. No explanation or solution was ever given. Community perceptions of peace & security Improving, but still insecure: Communities across Loikaw township report feeling that the situation is better, but there is always a risk that it could devolve back to open conflict. In part, this is linked to the failure of earlier bilateral ceasefires. However, communities no longer see many armed troops, which contributes to improved feelings of security for them. Demining as a political issue: Prior to 2011, the military government controlled many village tracts in Loikaw Township. Communities reportedly did not dare to move outside of their village tract as there were often random shootings.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BORDER CONSORTIUM Mid Year Overview: January to June 2018
    THE BORDER CONSORTIUM Mid Year Overview: January to June 2018 CONTEXT The situation in Burma/Myanmar continued to be fragile. The first half of the year demonstrated a clear pattern of increased activity by Myanmar’s Armed Forces (the Tatmadaw) throughout the country; asserting wider control especially in areas of influence for the ethnic armed oppositions. Clearance operations and artillery attacks in Kachin, Northern Shan and northern Karen States in early 2018 displaced over 10,000 people. In the west, the Rakhine crisis drove a massive number of refugees to Bangladesh in 2017 who are not able to return with some still fleeing for Bangladesh at the time of writing. Pressure from the International Community for the National League for Democracy (NLD) government and the Tatmadaw to address widespread and systematic violations and abuse escalated. The formal peace process continues to falter. While the New Mon State Party and the Lahu Democratic Party became signatories to the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement, the Tatmadaw has not demonstrated equal commitment to build confidence. Instead, restrictions were imposed on the Ethnic Armed Organisations (EAOs) efforts to hold consultations with communities in preparation for the National Dialogue. Tatmadaw attacks are also targeting civilian populations in Karen and Shan States, which are in violation of the ceasefire agreement and the spirit of the peace dialogues. After multiple schedule changes, the third session of the Union Peace Conference took place in early July 2018 but resulted in little progress. The session was, however, more inclusive with almost all of the EAOs, including the Karenni National Progressive Party (KNPP), observing the plenary sessions and participating in informal dialogue on the sidelines.
    [Show full text]