Kentford Lodge, Kentford, Suffolk KTD 019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kentford Lodge, Kentford, Suffolk KTD 019 Kentford Lodge, Kentford, Suffolk KTD 019 Client: Matthew Homes Ltd. Date: May 2017 Post-Excavation Assessment Report SACIC Report No. 2017/43 Author: Linzi Everett © SACIC HER Information Site Code: KTD 019 Site Name: Kentford Lodge Report Number 2017/43 Planning Application No: F/2013/0061/HYB Date of Fieldwork: 17th August to 10th December 2015 Grid Reference: TL 7069 6693 HER Event No: ESF25541 OASIS Reference: Suffolka1-283520 Curatorial Officer: Faye Minter Project Officer: Linzi Everett Client/Funding Body: Matthew Homes Ltd. Digital report submitted to Archaeological Data Service: http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/library/greylit Disclaimer Any opinions expressed in this report about the need for further archaeological work are those of Suffolk Archaeology CIC alone. Ultimately the need for further work will be determined by the Local Planning Authority and its Archaeological Advisors when a planning application is registered. Suffolk Archaeology cannot accept responsibility for inconvenience caused to the clients should the Planning Authority take a different view to that expressed in the report. Prepared By: Linzi Everett Date: May 2017 Approved By: Position: Date: Signed: Contents Abbreviations used in the text Drawing Conventions Summary 1.1. Introduction 5 1.2 Site location, geology, topography and land-use 5 1.3 The scope of the project 8 1.4 Archaeological and historical context 10 1.5 Original project aims 12 1.6 Circumstances and dates of fieldwork 12 1.7 Methodology 13 1.8 Post-excavation review 14 2. Results of the excavation fieldwork 17 2.1 Introduction 17 2.2 Site stratigraphy and site formation processes 17 2.2.1 Vertical stratigraphy 17 2.2.2 Stratigraphic relationships between and within features 19 2.2.3 Stratigraphic integrity 19 2.3 Phase 1, Early Neolithic: 4000-3000 BC 20 2.3.1 Significance of the evidence 20 2.4 Phase 2, Late Neolithic-Early Bronze Age: 2800-2200 BC 22 2.5 Phase 3, Early Bronze Age-Middle Bronze Age: 2200-1150 BC 22 2.5.1 Significance of the evidence 24 2.6 Phase 4, Earlier Iron Age: 800-400 BC 24 2.6.1 Significance of the evidence 27 2.7 Phase 5, Roman: AD43-410 28 2.7.1 Significance of the evidence 28 2.8 Phase 6, Early Anglo-Saxon: AD410- 650 28 2.8.1 Earthfast post hole buildings 29 2.8.2 Sunken featured buildings (SFBs) 34 2.8.3 Burnt flint pits 42 2.8.4 Pits 44 2.9 Phase 6+, Features allocated to early Anglo-Saxon period or later 46 2.9.1 Post-in-trench building 46 2.9.2 Significance of the Early Anglo-Saxon evidence 50 2.10 Phase 7, Post-medieval features 55 2.11 Phase 0, Undated features 55 2.12 Phase 0+, Natural features 55 3. Quantification and Assessment of the Finds and Environmental Evidence 57 3.1 Quantification and assessment of the bulk finds archive 57 3.1.1 Introduction 57 3.1.2 Pottery 58 3.1.3 Ceramic building material 69 3.1.4 Fired clay 71 3.1.5 Lava quern 73 3.1.6 Post-medieval glass 73 3.1.7 Clay tobacco pipe 73 3.1.8 Slate 74 3.1.9 Granite 74 3.1.10 Worked flint 74 3.1.11 Burnt flint and heat altered stone 77 3.1.12 Slag 79 3.1.13 Iron nails 80 3.2 Quantification and assessment of the small finds archive 80 3.2.1 Introduction 80 3.2.2 Factual data 80 3.2.3 The coins 89 3.3 Quantification and assessment of the environmental evidence 90 3.3.1 Animal bone 90 3.3.2 Human bone 95 3.3.3 Cremated bone 97 3.3.4 Shell 98 3.3.5 Charcoal 98 3.3.6 Charred plant macrofossils and other remains 98 4. Potential for analysis and publication and recommendations for further work 104 4.1 Realisation of the Original Research Aims 104 4.2 Updated project Design 105 4.2.1 Introduction 105 4.2.2 Revised research aims (RRA) and research questions (RQ) 105 4.2.3 Recommendations for further work for the stratigraphic evidence 110 4.2.4 Recommendations for further work for the finds evidence 116 4.2.5 The potential and significance of the small finds 124 4.2.6 The potential and significance of the environmental evidence 127 4.2.7 Scientific dating 131 5. Preliminary publication synopsis 133 5.1 EAA Publication synopsis 133 6. Analysis and publication: resources and programming 136 6.1 Tasks for analysis and publication 136 6.2 Staff and External specialists for analysis and publication 138 6.3 Timetable for Analysis and Publication 138 8. Acknowledgements 140 9. Bibliography 141 List of Figures Figure 1. Site location showing HER entries 7 Figure 2. Location of excavated and monitored areas 9 Figure 3. Extract from the 1883 Ordnance Survey Map, excavation area shown in red 11 Figure 4. Overall site plan 18 Figure 5. Plan of Phases 1, 2, 3 and 4 (Prehistoric) 21 Figure 6. Plan of post hole group 0616 25 Figure 7. Plan of Phases 6 and 6+ (Early Anglo-Saxon and EAS or later) 30 Figure 8. Plan of post hole buildings 0525 and 0143 31 Figure 9. Selected SFB plans 38 Figure 10. Plan of building 0844 47 Figure 11. Plan of Phases 7 and 0 (Post-medieval and undated) 56 List of Tables Table 1. Quantification of the physical stratigraphic archive 15 Table 2. Quantification of the digital archive 16 Table 3. Quantification of the of main context types 16 Table 4. Summary of phasing 17 Table 5. Summary of post holes in group 0616 26 Table 6. Summary of Iron Age phased pits 27 Table 7. Summary of post holes in groups 0146, 0150 and 1550 33 Table 8. Sunken Featured Buildings 35 Table 9. Summary of potentially significant SFB deposits 40 Table 10. List of burnt flint pits 42 Table 11. Summary of early Saxon phased pits 45 Table 12. Contexts associated with building 0844 49 Table 13. Finds quantities from combined phases of excavation 57 Table 14. Quantification of prehistoric and Roman pottery by broad period 58 Table 15. Quantification of Iron Age pottery fabrics 62 Table 16. Summary of pottery quantification 65 Table 17. Identifiable forms/shapes of Saxon vessels (MNV) 66 Table 18. Medieval and later pottery quantities 68 Table 19. Pottery quantification (sherd count) by context type and period 69 Table 20. Breakdown of ceramic building material by period 70 Table 21. Breakdown of CBM by main feature type 71 Table 22. Quantities of fired clay by major feature type 73 Table 23. Quantities of flints from individual contexts 75 Table 24. Total numbers of flints by feature type 76 Table 25. Breakdown of heat altered flint and stone 78 Table 26. Heat altered flint and stone by feature type 78 Table 27. Small finds by period and material 81 Table 28. Coins listed by context 90 Table 29. Animal bone: number of identified specimens present (or NISP) 91 Table 30. Quantity and provenance of animal bone assemblage 91 Table 31. Approximate bone weights by context 97 Table 32. Quantity and type of animal bone information available for further study 128 Table 33. Proposed radiocarbon dates 132 Table 34. Tasks for analysis and publication 137 Table 35. Suffolk Archaeology staff for analysis and publication 138 Table 36. External specialists for analysis and publication 138 Table 37. Institutions providing specialist services 138 List of Plates Plate 1. Inhumation 0550, looking east 20 Plate 3. Cremation 0861, pre-lifting, looking west 23 Plate 2. Urn 0701, looking north, with cremated bone visible in the base of the cut 23 Plate 4. Cremation 0397, partially excavated, showing placed stones around remains of a pot containing cremated human bone. Looking NE 23 Plate 5. Post hole building 0143, looking west 32 Plate 6. SFB 0370, looking west 36 Plate 7. SFB 0732, looking west 39 Plate 8. Cattle skulls associated with SFB 0341, looking south 40 Plate 9. Burnt flint pit 0358, looking NW 43 Plate 10. Burnt flint pit 0324, looking NE 43 Plate 11. 338kg of heat altered stone removed from 50% of burnt flint pit 0324 44 Plate 11. Feature 0270, pre-excavation, looking north 46 List of Appendices (attached CD) Appendix 1. Context list Appendix 2. Bulk finds catalogue Appendix 3. Small finds catalogue Appendix 4. Prehistoric and Roman pottery catalogue Appendix 5. Post-Roman pottery catalogue Appendix 6. Feature spotdates Appendix 7. Provisional count of flint by context Appendix 8. Heat altered flint and stone catalogue Appendix 9. Plant macrofossils and other remains Appendix 10. OASIS summary Appendix 11. Gantt chart Abbreviations used in the text EAS - Early Anglo-Saxon EBA - Early Bronze Age MBA - Middle Bronze Age EIA - Early Iron Age LNeo - Late Neolithic EVE - Estimated Vessel Equivalent MNV - Minimum number of vessels PDA - Proposed development area SACIC - Suffolk Archaeology Community Interest Company SCC - Suffolk County Council SCCAS - Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service SFB - Sunken Featured Building SUERC - Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre Drawing Conventions Plans Limit of Excavation Features Break of Slope Features - Conjectured Natural Features Sondages/Machine Strip Intrusion/Truncation Illustrated Section S.14 Cut Number 0008 Archaeological Features Sections Limit of Excavation Cut Modern Cut Cut - Conjectured Deposit Horizon Deposit Horizon - Conjectured Intrusion/Truncation Top of Natural Top Surface Break in Section Cut Number 0008 Deposit Number 0007 Ordnance Datum 18.45m OD Summary This report presents an assessment of the evidence from an archaeological excavation of 1.2ha in advance of a housing development at Kentford Lodge, Kentford.
Recommended publications
  • 15 Row Heath
    ROW HEATH ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILE 2021 This Division comprises The Rows Ward in its entirety plus parts of Lakenheath, Kentford & Moulton, Manor and Risby Wards www.suffolkobservatory.info 2 © Crown copyright and database rights 2021 Ordnance Survey 100023395 CONTENTS ▪ Demographic Profile: Age & Ethnicity ▪ Economy and Labour Market ▪ Schools & NEET ▪ Index of Multiple Deprivation ▪ Health ▪ Crime & Community Safety ▪ Additional Information ▪ Data Sources ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILES: AN INTRODUCTION These profiles have been produced to support elected members, constituents and other interested parties in understanding the demographic, economic, social and educational profile of their neighbourhoods. We have used the latest data available at the time of publication. Much more data is available from national and local sources than is captured here, but it is hoped that the profile will be a useful starting point for discussion, where local knowledge and experience can be used to flesh out and illuminate the information presented here. The profile can be used to help look at some fundamental questions e.g. • Does the age profile of the population match or differ from the national profile? • Is there evidence of the ageing profile of the county in all the wards in the Division or just some? • How diverse is the community in terms of ethnicity? • What is the impact of deprivation on families and residents? • Does there seem to be a link between deprivation and school performance? • What is the breakdown of employment sectors in the area? • Is it a relatively healthy area compared to the rest of the district or county? • What sort of crime is prevalent in the community? A vast amount of additional data is available on the Suffolk Observatory www.suffolkobservatory.info The Suffolk Observatory is a free online resource that contains all Suffolk’s vital statistics; it is the one-stop-shop for information and intelligence about Suffolk.
    [Show full text]
  • WSC Planning Decisions 31/20
    PLANNING AND REGULATORY SERVICES DECISIONS WEEK ENDING 31/07/2020 PLEASE NOTE THE DECISIONS LIST RUN FROM MONDAY TO FRIDAY EACH WEEK DC/20/0731/LB Application for Listed Building Consent - (i) Bell Cottage DECISION: Extension of chimney (ii) replacement of Church Road Approve Application windows (iii) removal of cement renders Bardwell DECISION TYPE: pointing and non-traditional infill to timber Bury St Edmunds Delegated frame and replacement with earth and Suffolk ISSUED DATED: lime-based, vapour-permeable materials IP31 1AH 29 Jul 2020 (iv) removal of UPVC and modern painted WARD: Bardwell softwood bargeboards and various window PARISH: Bardwell and door surrounds of modern design with replace with painted softwood (v) painted timber canopy over entrance door and (vi) replace plastic rainwater goods with painted cast iron. As amended by plans received 16th July 2020. APPLICANT: Mr Edward Bartlett DC/20/0740/FUL Planning Application - 1no. dwelling The Old Maltings DECISION: The Street Refuse Application APPLICANT: Mr John Shaw Barton Mills DECISION TYPE: IP28 6AA Delegation Panel AGENT: Richard Denny - M.R. Designs ISSUED DATED: 30 Jul 2020 WARD: Manor PARISH: Barton Mills DC/20/0831/FUL Planning Application - (i) Change of use Bilfri Dairy DECISION: and conversion of barn to dwelling (Class Felsham Road Approve Application C3) (retrospective) (ii) single storey rear Bradfield St George DECISION TYPE: extension (iii) change of use of agricultural IP30 0AD Delegated land to residential curtilage ISSUED DATED: 28 Jul 2020 APPLICANT: Mr. Pickwell and Miss. Milsom WARD: Rougham PARISH: Bradfield St. AGENT: Mr Jonny Rankin - Parker Planning George Services Ltd Planning and Regulatory Services, West Suffolk Council, West Suffolk House, Western Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP33 3YU DC/20/0939/TPO TPO 14 (1991) Tree Preservation Order - 1 Walton Way DECISION: (i) 3no.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Site Allocations- Medium Villages: KEN.M1 Relevant Policies
    1 Matter 16: Proposed site allocations- Medium Villages: KEN.M1 Relevant Policies- LP3, site allocations and relevant development management policies Issue 1: Kennett Garden Village (application reference 18/00752/ESO, June 2018) Kennett Action Group Hearing Statement This statement addresses all the questions to be raised. A. Summary 1.“The application is unsustainable (and) has been submitted ahead of an Inspector’s finding for East Cambs Local Plan. (Herringswell PC). “It is inappropriate to bring this application forward now when the 2018 submission Local Plan remains under examination by the Planning Inspectorate” (Campaign to Protect Rural England). Objections to the current application have included: Herringswell, Moulton, Kennett, and Kentford PCs, Newmarket Town Council, Suffolk and Cambridge CCs, Network Rail. 2. Only 20% of residents support the development. It is not “community led”. The number and detail of objections from the community (LP5) is much larger. The Kennett Action Group (KAG) petition “No to 500 Houses” was hand signed by 156 villagers, and delivered to ECDC. An additional online petition at change.org (“No to 500 houses in Kennett”) was organised by Kennett Action Group to facilitate signatures and the space for personal comments. This had 290 additional signatures, many with personal comments, and was delivered to ECDC. Principal concerns are based on the 4 times over expansion of the village and the large increase of already dangerous traffic. 3. Sustainable, lasting solutions to highways’ dangers and infrastructure have not been proposed by the applicant. The unmet infrastructure road requirements, include the increase in HGV traffic, dangers and bottlenecks at the Bell Inn, the A11, the school and the one-way railway bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • English Hundred-Names
    l LUNDS UNIVERSITETS ARSSKRIFT. N. F. Avd. 1. Bd 30. Nr 1. ,~ ,j .11 . i ~ .l i THE jl; ENGLISH HUNDRED-NAMES BY oL 0 f S. AND ER SON , LUND PHINTED BY HAKAN DHLSSON I 934 The English Hundred-Names xvn It does not fall within the scope of the present study to enter on the details of the theories advanced; there are points that are still controversial, and some aspects of the question may repay further study. It is hoped that the etymological investigation of the hundred-names undertaken in the following pages will, Introduction. when completed, furnish a starting-point for the discussion of some of the problems connected with the origin of the hundred. 1. Scope and Aim. Terminology Discussed. The following chapters will be devoted to the discussion of some The local divisions known as hundreds though now practi­ aspects of the system as actually in existence, which have some cally obsolete played an important part in judicial administration bearing on the questions discussed in the etymological part, and in the Middle Ages. The hundredal system as a wbole is first to some general remarks on hundred-names and the like as shown in detail in Domesday - with the exception of some embodied in the material now collected. counties and smaller areas -- but is known to have existed about THE HUNDRED. a hundred and fifty years earlier. The hundred is mentioned in the laws of Edmund (940-6),' but no earlier evidence for its The hundred, it is generally admitted, is in theory at least a existence has been found.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Allocations Local Plan (SALP)
    Forest Heath area of West Suffolk Council Site Allocations Local Plan (SALP) September 2019 West Suffolk Council SITE ALLOCATIONS LOCAL PLAN 2 Forest Heath area of West Suffolk Council SITE ALLOCATIONS LOCAL PLAN Contents 1. The Site Allocations Local Plan: background, process, and accompanying documents ..................................... 5 The former Forest Heath area Development Plan ......................................... 5 The plan-making process ......................................................................... 6 Infrastructure ......................................................................................... 6 Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulations (Screening) Assessment ..... 7 Policies Map ............................................................................................ 7 2. National and local planning policy context .................. 8 3. The Forest Heath area context, constraints and our evidence base ............................................................ 10 Background to plan preparation .............................................................. 10 The local context ................................................................................... 10 The natural and historic environment ....................................................... 10 RAF Mildenhall and RAF Lakenheath ........................................................ 12 Infrastructure and services ..................................................................... 12 4. How have the sites been selected?
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Heath District Council Membership 2015
    FOREST HEATH DISTRICT COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP 2015 - 2019 NAME, WARD, CONTACT DETAILS POLITICAL PARTY Ruth Allen 301 Hethersett Close, Newmarket, Suffolk, CB8 7AT Severals, Tel: 07759 155522 (M) West Suffolk Independent Email: [email protected] Michael Anderson 179 Pinza Close, Studlands Park, Newmarket, Suffolk, Severals, Conservative CB8 7AR Tel: 01638 601624 (H); 07767 476817 (M) Email: [email protected] Andrew Appleby 3 St Albans, Fordham Road, Newmarket, Suffolk, Severals, CB8 7AJ West Suffolk Independent Tel: 01638 664291 (H); 07724 640015 (M) Email: [email protected] Chris Barker 13 Hillside, Heath Road, Newmarket, Suffolk, CB8 8AY St Mary’s, Conservative Tel: 07881 815325 (M) Email: [email protected] John Bloodworth 7 Wentworth Drive, Mildenhall, Suffolk, IP28 7JT Market, Conservative Tel: 01638 714255 (H); 07765 477949 (M) Email: [email protected] David Bowman 3 Vicarage Gardens, Mildenhall, Bury St Edmunds, Eriswell & The Rows, Suffolk, IP28 7RW Conservative Tel: 07711 593737 (M) Email: [email protected] Ruth Bowman 3 Vicarage Gardens, Mildenhall, Bury St Edmunds, Market, Conservative Suffolk, IP28 7RW Tel: 01638 510896 (H); 07966 373063 (M) Email: [email protected] Rona Burt 52 High Street, Tuddenham St Mary, Bury St Edmunds, Iceni, Conservative Suffolk, IP28 6SA Tel: 01638 712309 (H); 07920 046391 (M) Email: [email protected] Louis Busuttil 3 Kingsway, Mildenhall, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, Great Heath, Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • Garden Cottage and the Walled Garden Lanwades Park, Kentford, Suffolk
    GARDEN COTTAGE AND THE WALLED GARDEN LANWADES PARK, KENTFORD, SUFFOLK GARDEN COTTAGE AND THE WALLED GARDEN DISTANCES LANWADES PARK, KENTFORD, NEWMARKET, SUFFOLK, CB8 7UU KENNETT STATION 1 MILE NEWMARKET 4 MILES BURY ST EDMUNDS 9 MILES A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE AN ATTRACTIVE COTTAGE AND CAMBRIDGE 18 MILES SUBSTANTIAL WALLED GARDEN WITH PREVIOUS COMMERCIAL USE AND STANSTED AIRPORT 38 MILES LONDON 72 MILES EXCITING POTENTIAL (SUBJECT TO PLANNING) LOT 1: GARDEN COTTAGE & PADDOCK FOR SALE AS A WHOLE OR IN 2 LOTS - Entrance Porch - Hall - Sitting Room - Dining Room - Kitchen - Shower Room and Cloakroom - 3 Double Bedrooms - Driveway with Parking - Established Garden and Attractive Paddock - 0.73 acres (sts) LOT 2: THE WALLED GARDEN - Attractive Former Walled Garden - Extensive Range of Former Kennel and Cattery Buildings together with Associated Ancillary Units - Exciting Potential for Alternative Uses in a Stunning Setting (Subject to Planning) - 1.76 acres (sts) TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 2.48 acres in all (sts) THE PROPERTY Garden Cottage and The Walled Garden form part of the historic Lanwades Park Estate. Lanwades Hall, formerly owned by the Animal Health Trust and sold by Jackson-Stops and Merrifields in 2016 was built in 1907, two impressive Gate Lodges form the main entrance to the Hall. Garden Cottage and The Walled Garden is located adjacent to what is now the main entrance to Lanwades Park, home of The Animal Health Trust. There is now an exciting and unique opportunity to purchase the property, either as a whole or in two separate lots with potential for further enhancing an attractive residential property and alternative uses for The Walled Garden (subject to obtaining the necessary planning consents).
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Applications Registered
    LIST 38 18 September 2020 Applications Registered between 14.09.20 & 18.09.20 PLANNING APPLICATIONS REGISTERED The following applications for Planning Permission, Listed Building, Conservation Area and Advertisement Consent and relating to Tree Preservation Orders and Trees in Conservation Areas have been made to this Council. A copy of the applications and plans accompanying them may be inspected on our website www.westsuffolk.gov.uk. Representations should be made in writing, quoting the application number and emailed to [email protected] to arrive not later than 21 days from the date of this list. Note: Representations on Brownfield Permission in Principle applications and/or associated Technical Details Consent applications must arrive not later than 14 days from the date of this list. Application No. Proposal Location DC/20/1505/TPO TPO 406(2005) Tree Preservation Order - Former Denholme VALID DATE: 1no. Acer cappadocicum rubrum The Street 17.09.2020 (Cappadocicum Maple) crown thin by 10% Coney Weston (remove crossing and duplicate branches), Bury St Edmunds EXPIRY DATE: raise crown by up to 4 meters, crown Suffolk 12.11.2020 reduction by up to 2 meters IP31 1HG WARD: Bardwell APPLICANT: Mr Christopher Garman GRID REF: PARISH: Bardwell 595597 278087 CASE OFFICER: Isabella Taylor DC/20/1394/FUL Householder Planning Application - Two Barrow Hall VALID DATE: storey extension to an existing dwelling Church Road 15.09.2020 Barrow APPLICANT: N Johnston IP29 5AX EXPIRY DATE: 10.11.2020 AGENT: Mr Keith Day GRID REF: WARD:
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Share 2021
    Parish Share 2021 Deanery Summary: 28 February 2021 29th February Deanery Received 2020 Received Clare £ 9,574 £ 14,582 Gipping Valley £ 67,109 £ 95,058 Hadleigh £ 13,409 £ 31,772 Ixworth £ 13,388 £ 16,755 Lavenham £ 42,024 £ 38,734 Mildenhall £ 16,483 £ 19,781 Sudbury £ 39,197 £ 32,414 Thingoe £ 79,127 £ 77,186 Sudbury Archdeaconry £ 280,311 £ 326,282 Colneys £ 54,479 £ 66,254 Hartismere £ 15,289 £ 21,384 Hoxne £ 9,110 £ 15,569 Loes £ 21,994 £ 42,071 Samford £ 15,972 £ 16,199 Saxmundham £ 35,181 £ 48,089 Waveney & Blyth £ 46,260 £ 52,586 Woodbridge £ 44,720 £ 62,613 Suffolk Archdeaconry £ 243,005 £ 324,766 Ipswich £ 76,329 £ 63,850 Ipswich Archdeaconry £ 76,329 £ 63,850 Other Donations £ 490 £ - February 2021 /2020 £ 600,135 £ 714,897 05/05/2021 P:\Accounts General\Parish Share\2021\Reports\Share Report-Funds Received as at 28th February 2021 Parish Share 2021 Clare Deanery: 2021 Parish/Benefice Received Haverhill £ - Withersfield £ - Waiver agreed by Finance Committee Haverhill with Withersfield Total £ - Barnardiston £ - Great Bradley £ - Great Thurlow £ - Great Wratting £ - Kedington £ - Little Bradley £ - Little Thurlow £ - Little Wratting £ - Under-allocation £ - Stourhead Benefice Total £ - Cowlinge £ - Denston £ - Lidgate £ - Ousden £ 1,000 Stansfield £ - Stradishall £ - Wickhambrook £ 800 To be allocated The Benefice of Bansfield Total £ 1,800 Chedburgh £ - Chevington £ 2,536 Depden £ - Hargrave £ 500 Hawkedon £ 1,238 Rede £ - The Benefice of Suffolk Heights Total £ 4,274 Cavendish £ - Clare with Poslingford £ 3,500 Hundon £
    [Show full text]
  • WSC Planning Decisions 33/19
    PLANNING AND REGULATORY SERVICES DECISIONS WEEK ENDING 16/08/2019 PLEASE NOTE THE DECISIONS LIST RUN FROM MONDAY TO FRIDAY EACH WEEK DC/19/0084/FUL Planning Application - 1no dwelling Land North Of Forge DECISION: Cottage Approve Application APPLICANT: Mr P M Hollins Blacksmith Lane DECISION TYPE: Barnham Delegated Suffolk ISSUED DATED: 13 Aug 2019 WARD: Bardwell PARISH: Barnham DC/19/1234/FUL Planning Application - (i) Change of use 19 High Street DECISION: from A2 (Estate Agent) to A5 (Take Away) Brandon Approve Application (ii) installation of extractor fan IP27 0AQ DECISION TYPE: Delegated APPLICANT: Mr Ugur Baris ISSUED DATED: 12 Aug 2019 AGENT: Mr Mahir Kilic WARD: Brandon Central PARISH: Brandon DC/19/1109/TPO TPO 354 (2003) Tree Preservation Order - Cecil And Larter DECISION: (i) 3no. Maple Acer (T3, T15, T7 on plan Lamdin Road Approve Application and T3,T5, T7 on order) raise crown from Bury St Edmunds DECISION TYPE: ground level to 4 metres; (ii) 5no. Maple Suffolk Delegated Acer (T27,T26,T25, T21, TB on plan IP32 6NU ISSUED DATED: andT19,T21,T25,T26,T27 on order) raise 12 Aug 2019 crown from ground level to 4 metres; (iii) WARD: St Olaves 9no. Yew (TC on plan, G1 on order) Fell; PARISH: Bury St (iv) 1no. Norway Maple (T25 on plan and Edmunds Town Council T25 on order) Fell; (v) 2no. Lime (TA on plan, and T20, T23 on order) raise crown from ground level to 4 metres; (vi) TPO 013 (1975) -2no. Maple and 1no. Chestnut (M1 on plan G3 on order) raise crown from ground level to 4 metres APPLICANT: Mr Terry Scott AGENT: Suffolk Tree Services Planning and Regulatory Services, West Suffolk Council, West Suffolk House, Western Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP33 3YU DC/19/1123/HH Householder Planning Application - (i) 1no.
    [Show full text]
  • Su:{''Folk. (Kelly S
    1 1174 MILDENHALL. SU:{''FOLK. (KELLY S Here are the extensive flour mills of Mr. W. S. Owers, who chancel is paved with encaustic tiles : the east window is has added to them an effective roller mill on the Hungarian stained, in memory of Emily Vavasor Durell, erected by system, fitted np by Mr. H. Simon C.E. milling engineer, her sister, Mrs. Livingstone, the wife of the present vicar : Manchester : there are some good shops, hotels and inns. there are two in memory of Mr. John Webb, a former The market cross is of the time of Henry V. constructed of churchwarden, one also to his wife and one to his daughter, timber, hexagonal in form and roofed with lead; the market Mrs. Gostwick: thero are rso sittings. The Rev. Herbert day is Friday. A horticultural show is held here annually. Seddon Howley M. .A.. of Queen's College, Oxford, has been Here are almshouses, founded in 1722 by Sir Thomas curate in charge since x88g and resides at Mildenhall. Hanmer, for four poor widows, and several other small There is a chapel for Wesleyans, built in 1829, for about charities, amounting in the whole to £150 yearly. A 300. The church of England Waifs and Strays Society Cottage Hospital was established here in 1868 with eight have a home for girls here, viz. St. John's home. beds, and the average number of patients during the year is West Row, 2~ miles west, is a large straggling village. 54· Manor House, the scat of Sir Edward Herbert Bunbury The church of St.
    [Show full text]
  • County Policing Map
    From April 2016 Areas Somerleyton, Ashby and Herringfleet SNT Boundaries County Policing Map Parishes and Ipswich Ward Boundaries SNT Base 17 18 North Cove Shipmeadow Ilketshall St. John Ilketshall St. Andrew Ilketshall St. Lawrence St. Mary, St. Margaret South Ilketshall Elmham, Henstead with Willingham St. May Hulver Street St. Margaret, South Elmham St. Peter, South ElmhamSt. Michael, South Elmham HomersfieldSt. Cross, South Elmham All Saints and 2 St. Nicholas, South Elmham St. James, South Elmham Beck Row, Holywell Row and Kenny Hill Linstead Parva Linstead Magna Thelnetham 14 1 Wenhaston with Mildenhall Mells Hamlet Southwold Rickinghall Superior 16 Rickinghall Inferior Thornham Little Parva LivermLivermore Ixworthxwo ThorpeThorp Thornham Magna Athelington St.S GenevieveFornhamest Rishangles Fornham All Saints Kentford 4 3 15 Wetheringsett cum Brockford Old Newton Ashfield cum with Thorpe Dagworth Stonham Parva Stratford Aldringham Whelnetham St. Andrew Little cum Thorpe Brandeston Whelnetham Great Creeting St. Peter Chedburgh Gedding Great West Monewden Finborough 7 Creeting Bradfield Combust with Stanningfield Needham Market Thorpe Morieux Brettenham Little Bradley Somerton Hawkedon Preston Kettlebaston St. Mary Great Blakenham Barnardiston Little BromeswellBrome Blakenham ut Sutton Heath Little Little 12 Wratting Bealings 6 Flowton Waldringfield Great 9 Waldingfield 5 Rushmere St. Andrew 8 Chattisham Village Wenham Magna 11 Stratton Hall 10 Rushmere St. Andrew Town Stratford Trimley St. Mary St. Mary 13 Erwarton Clare Needham Market Sproughton Melton South Cove Bedingfi eld Safer Neighbourhood Cowlinge Nettlestead Stoke-by-Nayland Orford Southwold Braiseworth Denston Norton Stratford St. Mary Otley Spexhall Brome and Oakley Teams and parishes Depden Offton Stutton Pettistree St. Andrew, Ilketshall Brundish Great Bradley Old Newton with Tattingstone Playford St.
    [Show full text]