Su:{''Folk. (Kelly S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
15 Row Heath
ROW HEATH ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILE 2021 This Division comprises The Rows Ward in its entirety plus parts of Lakenheath, Kentford & Moulton, Manor and Risby Wards www.suffolkobservatory.info 2 © Crown copyright and database rights 2021 Ordnance Survey 100023395 CONTENTS ▪ Demographic Profile: Age & Ethnicity ▪ Economy and Labour Market ▪ Schools & NEET ▪ Index of Multiple Deprivation ▪ Health ▪ Crime & Community Safety ▪ Additional Information ▪ Data Sources ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILES: AN INTRODUCTION These profiles have been produced to support elected members, constituents and other interested parties in understanding the demographic, economic, social and educational profile of their neighbourhoods. We have used the latest data available at the time of publication. Much more data is available from national and local sources than is captured here, but it is hoped that the profile will be a useful starting point for discussion, where local knowledge and experience can be used to flesh out and illuminate the information presented here. The profile can be used to help look at some fundamental questions e.g. • Does the age profile of the population match or differ from the national profile? • Is there evidence of the ageing profile of the county in all the wards in the Division or just some? • How diverse is the community in terms of ethnicity? • What is the impact of deprivation on families and residents? • Does there seem to be a link between deprivation and school performance? • What is the breakdown of employment sectors in the area? • Is it a relatively healthy area compared to the rest of the district or county? • What sort of crime is prevalent in the community? A vast amount of additional data is available on the Suffolk Observatory www.suffolkobservatory.info The Suffolk Observatory is a free online resource that contains all Suffolk’s vital statistics; it is the one-stop-shop for information and intelligence about Suffolk. -
WSC Planning Decisions 24/19
PLANNING AND REGULATORY SERVICES DECISIONS WEEK ENDING 14/06/2019 PLEASE NOTE THE DECISIONS LIST RUN FROM MONDAY TO FRIDAY EACH WEEK DC/19/0852/TCA Tree in a Conservation Area Notification - 1 Walnut Tree Cottage DECISION: no Walnut Tree - Lateral reduction on north Knox Lane No Objections aspect to create 1metre clearance from Bardwell DECISION TYPE: telephone cable IP31 1AX Delegated ISSUED DATED: APPLICANT: Mr Richard Combes 11 Jun 2019 WARD: Bardwell PARISH: Bardwell DC/19/0962/TCA Trees in a Conservation Area Notification - Bardwell Cevc Primary DECISION: 1no.Yew (circled red on plan) - Reduce School No Objections height by up to 3 metres and crown raise School Lane DECISION TYPE: to 2 metres above ground level. Bardwell Delegated IP31 1AD ISSUED DATED: APPLICANT: Ms Sarah Allman 11 Jun 2019 WARD: Bardwell PARISH: Bardwell DC/19/0717/HH Householder Planning Application - (i) Rose Cottage DECISION: Proposed two storey rear extension (ii) Stanton Road Approve Application Proposed single storey side extension Barningham DECISION TYPE: IP31 1BS Delegated APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs R Vansittant ISSUED DATED: 11 Jun 2019 AGENT: Mr David Hart WARD: Barningham PARISH: Barningham DC/19/0802/HH Householder Planning Application - (i) Orchard End DECISION: Replace existing garage roof with a pitched 17 Mill Lane Approve Application tiled roof (ii) render walls to match Barrow DECISION TYPE: approved alteration work Bury St Edmunds Delegated Suffolk ISSUED DATED: APPLICANT: Tina Mc Carthy IP29 5BS 11 Jun 2019 WARD: Barrow AGENT: Mr Mark Cleveland PARISH: Barrow Cum Denham Planning and Regulatory Services, West Suffolk Council, West Suffolk House, Western Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP33 3YU DC/19/1036/TCA Trees in a Conservation Area Application - 29 The Street DECISION: 1no. -
Role Description June 2018 (002)
ROLE DESCRIPTION Role description signed off by: Archdeacon of Sudbury Date: June 2018 To be reviewed 6 months after commencement of the appointment, and at each Ministerial Development Review, alongside the setting of objectives 1 Details of post Role title Associate Priest /Team Vicar Designate Name of benefice Beck Row Group Deanery Mildenhall Archdeaconry Sudbury Initial point of contact on terms of service Archdeacon of Sudbury 2. Role Purpose General To share with the Bishop both in the cure of souls and in responsibility, under God, for growing the Kingdom in this benefice. To ensure that the church communities in the benefice flourish and engage positively with ‘Growing in God’ and the Diocesan Vision and Strategy. To work together as the Team Vicar of this benefice, having regard to the calling and responsibilities of the clergy as described in the Canons, the Ordinal, the Code of Professional Conduct for the Clergy, and other relevant legislation. To collaborate within the Deanery both in current mission and ministry and, through the Deanery Plan, in such reshaping of ministry as resources and opportunities may require. To attend Deanery Chapter and Deanery Synod and to play a full part in the wider life of the Deanery. To work with ordained and lay colleagues as set out in their individual role descriptions and work agreements, and to ensure that, where relevant, they have working agreements which are reviewed. This involves discerning and developing the gifts and ministries of all members of the congregation. To work with the PCCs towards the development of the local church as described in the benefice profile, and to review those needs with them. -
Consulation Draft V4
Suffolk Minerals & Waste Local Plan, Submission Draft, June 2018 Appendix 3: Safeguarding maps 22.1 The following schedule and maps indicate existing and proposed minerals and waste development that is subject to safeguarding policies MP11 and WP17 respectively. 22.2 The large 1:100,000 scale Proposals Map (located in the Map Pocket in the hard copy version) indicates the general location of safeguarded minerals and waste development. The pink inset panels, which are numbered by District/Borough, can be cross-referenced via the following schedule to smaller 1: 25,000 scale inset maps in the following pages. The safeguarded sites are shown in orange and the 250-metre safeguarding zone is highlighted in blue. 22.3 The safeguarded Waste Water Treatment facilities are only depicted on the Proposals Map by their 400-metre safeguarding buffer radius. Table 1: Mineral Sites Grid Ref Map Site Site Name Operator No Ref Easting Northing MS8 M1 Barham Brett Aggregates 612116 251410 SB1 M2 Barnham Mick George 584122 279248 B2 M3 Belstead Ingram 611170 239806 FH3 M4 Cavenham Allen Newport 574789 271383 B3 M5 Layham Brett Aggregates 601392 240221 B2 M6 Tattingstone Shotley Holdings 612162 236274 MS5 M7 Wetherden Aggmax 599309 262979 B2 M8 Wherstead Brett Aggregates 613629 239761 FH4 M9 Worlington Frimstone 569860 271290 W4 M10 Wangford Cemex UK Ltd 646395 279695 MS8 M11 Shrubland Quarry Brett Aggregates 612000 253700 The Lyndon W4 M12 Henham Quarry 645303 279091 Pallet Group W3 M13 Flixton Quarry Cemex UK Ltd 629925 286424 MS8 M14 Gallows Hill Quarry -
WSC Planning Decisions 31/20
PLANNING AND REGULATORY SERVICES DECISIONS WEEK ENDING 31/07/2020 PLEASE NOTE THE DECISIONS LIST RUN FROM MONDAY TO FRIDAY EACH WEEK DC/20/0731/LB Application for Listed Building Consent - (i) Bell Cottage DECISION: Extension of chimney (ii) replacement of Church Road Approve Application windows (iii) removal of cement renders Bardwell DECISION TYPE: pointing and non-traditional infill to timber Bury St Edmunds Delegated frame and replacement with earth and Suffolk ISSUED DATED: lime-based, vapour-permeable materials IP31 1AH 29 Jul 2020 (iv) removal of UPVC and modern painted WARD: Bardwell softwood bargeboards and various window PARISH: Bardwell and door surrounds of modern design with replace with painted softwood (v) painted timber canopy over entrance door and (vi) replace plastic rainwater goods with painted cast iron. As amended by plans received 16th July 2020. APPLICANT: Mr Edward Bartlett DC/20/0740/FUL Planning Application - 1no. dwelling The Old Maltings DECISION: The Street Refuse Application APPLICANT: Mr John Shaw Barton Mills DECISION TYPE: IP28 6AA Delegation Panel AGENT: Richard Denny - M.R. Designs ISSUED DATED: 30 Jul 2020 WARD: Manor PARISH: Barton Mills DC/20/0831/FUL Planning Application - (i) Change of use Bilfri Dairy DECISION: and conversion of barn to dwelling (Class Felsham Road Approve Application C3) (retrospective) (ii) single storey rear Bradfield St George DECISION TYPE: extension (iii) change of use of agricultural IP30 0AD Delegated land to residential curtilage ISSUED DATED: 28 Jul 2020 APPLICANT: Mr. Pickwell and Miss. Milsom WARD: Rougham PARISH: Bradfield St. AGENT: Mr Jonny Rankin - Parker Planning George Services Ltd Planning and Regulatory Services, West Suffolk Council, West Suffolk House, Western Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP33 3YU DC/20/0939/TPO TPO 14 (1991) Tree Preservation Order - 1 Walton Way DECISION: (i) 3no. -
WSC Planning Decisions 43/19
PLANNING AND REGULATORY SERVICES DECISIONS WEEK ENDING 25/10/2019 PLEASE NOTE THE DECISIONS LIST RUN FROM MONDAY TO FRIDAY EACH WEEK DC/15/2298/FUL Planning Application - (i) Extension and Village Hall DECISION: alterations to Hopton Village Hall (ii) Thelnetham Road Approve Application Doctor's surgery and associated car Hopton DECISION TYPE: parking and the modification of the existing Suffolk Committee vehicular access onto Thelnetham Road IP22 2QY ISSUED DATED: (iii) residential development of 37 24 Oct 2019 dwellings (including 11 affordable housing WARD: Barningham units) and associated public open space PARISH: Hopton Cum including a new village green, Knettishall landscaping,ancillary works and creation of new vehicular access onto Bury Road APPLICANT: Pigeon Investment Management AGENT: Evolution Town Planning LLP - Mr David Barker DC/18/0628/HYB Hybrid Planning Application - 1. Full Former White House Stud, DECISION: Planning Application - (i) Horse racing White Lodge Stables Refuse Application industry facility (including workers Warren Road DECISION TYPE: dwelling) and (ii) new access (following Herringswell Delegated demolition of existing buildings to the CB8 7QP ISSUED DATED: south of the site) 2. Outline Planning 22 Oct 2019 Application (Means of Access to be WARD: Iceni considered) (i) up to 100no. dwellings and PARISH: Herringswell (ii) new access (following demolition of existing buildings to the north of the site and the existing dwelling known as White Lodge Bungalow). APPLICANT: Hill Residential Ltd AGENT: Mrs Meghan Bonner - KWA Architects (Cambridge) Ltd Planning and Regulatory Services, West Suffolk Council, West Suffolk House, Western Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP33 3YU DC/19/0235/FUL Planning Application - 2no. -
The Topography of Mediaeval Eriswell J. T. Munday
THE TOPOGRAPHY OF MEDIAEVAL ERISWELL By THE REVD. J. T. MUNDAY,M.A. This has been written to correct a number of mis-statements which have been published in the past. The West Suffolk duplex manor of Eriswell cum Chamberlains (in Domesday Eriswell with Coclesworth) is coterminous with the ecclesiastical parish of St. Peter with St. Laurence. It is roughly an isosceles triangle with its three and a quarter mile base standing north and south along the edge of fen (Fig. 28). The blunted apex of the triangle lies nearly five miles away to the east, in the heart of breckland. The pattern of mediaeval habitation in the parish has no con- nection with that of Roman-British times: the arrival of Anglo- Saxon settlers began a new pattern which persisted virtually until the Enclosure Award of 1818. There were throughout the Middle Ages two groups of habitations, both standing on the low bank which lies just back from the fen edge, one, Eriswell St. Peter, is at the northern end of the triangle's base, the other, Eriswell St. Laurence, a mile and a half to the south. The dwindled remains of the former now appear on maps as 'Little Eriswell' while the latter has captured the name 'Eriswell' : a road, 'the Street' connects the two—it is the continuation of the road which enters the parish from Lakenheath to the north. From the middle of the 12th century the lords of this duplex manor were of the de Rochester family. On the death of the last male in 1269 a married sister carried it to the de Tudenham family. -
58 Little Eriswell, Eriswell ERL 208
ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT SCCAS REPORT No. 2009/144 58 Little Eriswell, Eriswell ERL 208 A. Tester © August 2009 www.suffolkcc.gov.uk/e-and-t/archaeology Lucy Robinson, County Director of Environment and Transport Endeavour House, Russel Road, Ipswich, IP1 2BX. HER Information Planning Application No: F/2006/0642/Ful Date of Fieldwork: May 2009 Grid Reference: TL 7205 7966 Funding Body: Mr Taylor Curatorial Officer: Jess Tipper Project Officer: Andrew Tester Oasis Reference: 1-64813 Digital report submitted to Archaeological Data Service: http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/library/greylit Contents Summary Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Geology and topography 1 3. Archaeological and historical background 1 4. Methodology 1 5. Results 5 5.1 Iron Age 5.2 Roman 5.3 Post medieval 6. Finds 6 7. Discussion 8 8. Archive deposition 8 9. List of contributors and acknowledgements 9 10. Bibliography 9 Disclaimer 9 List of Figures 1. Site location 2 2. Trench plan 3 3. Sections 4 List of Tables 1. Finds quantities 6 2. Pottery catalogue by context 6 List of Appendices 1. Brief and specification 2. Context list Summary The excavation of footing trenches for a single storey extension to 58 Little Eriswell exposed a range of features including an Iron Age ditch, and a ditch, three shallow pits and two postholes that are all thought to be Early Roman. Three further ditches, dated to the post-medieval period probably relate to the drainage of the fens for agriculture. 1. Introduction Archaeological monitoring was carried out during the excavation of footing trenches for a single storey extension to 58 Little Eriswell, Mildenhall. -
FHDC Planning Decisions 29/17
FOREST HEATH DISTRICT COUNCIL PLANNING AND GROWTH DECISIONS WEEK ENDING 14/07/2017 PLEASE NOTE THE DECISIONS LIST RUN FROM MONDAY TO FRIDAY EACH WEEK DC/17/1041/HH Householder Planning Application - (i) Two 15 Coronation Place DECISION: storey side extension (ii) addition of Brandon Approve Application external wall insulation to the existing Suffolk DECISION TYPE: property IP27 0EP Delegated ISSUED DATED: APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs G Conway 12 Jul 2017 AGENT: Mr Paul Grisbrook - P Grisbrook WARD: Brandon West Building Design Service PARISH: Brandon DC/16/1897/FUL Planning Application - 6no. detached Land South Of DECISION: dwellings with cart lodges, garages and Laurel Close Approve Application associated works (demolition of agricultural Holywell Row DECISION TYPE: buildings) Suffolk Delegated ISSUED DATED: APPLICANT: Mr P G Haylock 12 Jul 2017 AGENT: Mr Adam Tuck - PlanSurv Ltd WARD: Eriswell And The Rows PARISH: Beck Row DC/17/0912/OUT Outline Planning Permission (All Matters Open Area Of Land Larks DECISION: Reserved) - 1no. dwelling Place Refuse Application Wilde Street DECISION TYPE: APPLICANT: Mr Errol Van Helmond Beck Row Delegation Panel AGENT: Mr Michael Jones - Albion Planning Suffolk ISSUED DATED: Consultants Ltd 12 Jul 2017 WARD: Eriswell And The Rows PARISH: Beck Row DC/17/1016/HH Householder Planning Application - (i) Lady Love DECISION: conversion of existing garage and single Rookery Drove Approve Application storey side extension, (ii) single storey Beck Row DECISION TYPE: rear and side extension (following the IP28 8DL Delegated -
Eriswell Drive, Lakenheath Brandon, Suffolk, Ip27 9Ag
ERISWELL DRIVE, LAKENHEATH BRANDON, SUFFOLK, IP27 9AG ERISWELL DRIVE, LAKENHEATH BRANDON, SUFFOLK, IP27 9AG A refurbished two bedroom terraced house situated on an established development in this Suffolk village. Offering spacious and well laid out accommodation, conveniently located for access to RAF Mildenhall and RAF Lakenheath. EPC Rating D - 57 Available Now Refurbished two bedroom house situated on an established development in the village of Lakenheath, lying within close proximity of the USAF bases. Services: All mains services are believed to be connected to the property. Local Authority: Forest Heath District Council Council Tax: A - SITUATION & LOCATION The property is in good decorative order throughout and has a modern white bathroom suite with shower over the bath. Lakenheath has a range of amenities including churches; public houses; shops and other services; sporting and recreation facilities; a doctor's surgery and schooling for younger children. Lakenheath railway station is about 2 miles from the village centre. Lakenheath is about 6 miles from Brandon and 12 miles from the larger Norfolk town of Thetford. The town of Mildenhall lies approximately 4 miles away with Bury St. Edmunds located approximately 10 miles to the South. ENTRANCE PORCH UPVC sealed unit double glazed door leading to. LOUNGE/DINER (L-shaped) 21'9 x 15'11 (6.63m x 4.reducing to 8'4 (2.54m) 85m) Windows to front and rear aspect. Cupboard housing electric warm air heating system, under stairs cupboard, built in cloaks cupboard, carpet and door to rear garden. KITCHEN 10'2 x 10'4 (3.1m x 3.15m) (max) Range of wall and floor cupboard units with work surfaces over incorporating stainless steel sink unit with mixer tap. -
16 Inbound Newmarket - Mildenhall - Bury St Edmunds Suf 7-16- -Y08-11
390050788 Stand 3 Bus Station, Bury St Edmunds 1 (first) 2 (first) 3 (first) 390050800 adj Railway Station, Bury St Edmunds 1 2 3 390050806 adj Thingoe Hill, Bury St Edmunds 1 2 3 390050809 adj Tollgate Lane, Bury St Edmunds 1 2 3 390051205 Barton Hill, Fornham St Martin 1 2 3 390050650 o/s The Woolpack, Fornham St Martin 1 2 3 390050649 adj Oak Close, Fornham St Genevieve 1 2 3 390050642 o/s Parklands Green, Fornham St Genevieve 1 2 3 390050645 opp Post Office, Fornham All Saints 1 2 3 390050647 opp The Green, Fornham All Saints 1 2 3 390050640 adj Three Kings Roundabout, Fornham All Saints 1 2 3 390050633 Bus Shelter, Hengrave 1 2 3 390050608 opp Church, Flempton 1 2 3 390050219 Bus Shelter, Lackford 1 2 3 390050216 opp New Cottages, Lackford 1 2 3 390050991 opp West Stow Turning, Icklingham 1 2 3 390020173 opp The Farthings, Icklingham 1 2 3 390020170 adj Red Lion, Icklingham 1 2 3 390020168 adj Camp Close, Icklingham 1 2 3 390020418 Silver Lodge, Barton Mills 3 1 2 390020325 o/s College of Technology, Mildenhall (Suffk) 3 390020326 Lark Road, Mildenhall (Suffk) 1 2 3 390020315 opp Police Station, Mildenhall (Suffk) 1 2 3 390020313 Croft Place, Mildenhall (Suffk) 3 1 2 390020295 W-bound Queensway, Mildenhall (Suffk) 3 390020441 390020296 Stand C Bus Station, Mildenhall (Suffk) Mildenhall Col Sheldrake Way Site, Mildenhall (Suffk) 1 2 4 (first) 3 390020289 opp St Marys Church, Mildenhall (Suffk) 1 2 3 4 390020290 Bridge Farm Close, Mildenhall (Suffk) 1 2 3 4 390020159 S-bound Walnut Tree, Worlington (Suffk) 1 2 3 4 390020459 adj Thistle -
Land West of Eriswell Road, Lakenheath
DEV/FH/18/021 Development Control Committee 5 September 2018 Planning Application F/13/0394/OUT – Land West of Eriswell Road, Lakenheath Date 9th August 2013 Expiry Date: 28th February 2018 Registered: Case Officer: Gareth Durrant Recommendation: Grant planning permission Parish: Lakenheath Ward: Lakenheath Proposal: Erection of up to 140 dwellings Site: Land West of Eriswell Road, Lakenheath Applicant: Elveden Farms Ltd Synopsis: Application under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and associated matters. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Committee determine the attached application and associated matters. CONTACT CASE OFFICER: Gareth Durrant Email: [email protected] Telephone: 01284 757345 Background: This application is referred to the Development Control Committee as it is a proposal for ‘major’ development. Furthermore the recommendation to grant planning permission is contrary to the provisions of the extant Development Plan. The proposal also raises complex planning issues. This application has been considered previously by the Development Control Committee on two occasions culminating in a resolution to grant planning permission at the meeting on 5 July 2017. The planning application is returned to Committee to enable it to consider it afresh in the light of material changes in circumstances which have occurred since it reached its decision in 2017. In particular, a ruling earlier this year of the Court of Justice of the European Union has changed the way in which decision makers must interpret and apply the specific provisions of the ‘Habitats Regulations’ (reference Case C323/17 - People over Wind, Peter Sweetman v Coillte Teoranta).