Basic concept for water balance assessment in

Brankica Majkic, Prof. Dr. Stevan Prohaska, Dr. Dragoslav Isailovic Institute for the Development of Water Resources “Jaroslav Cerni” Jaroslava Cernog 80,11226 Pinosava, , Serbia [email protected]

Abstract:

This paper presents the basic characteristics of a developed concept for water balance assessment in Serbia. The starting point is a baseline water-balance equation which reflects all water inputs into a specific catchment area and, following the inclusion of all output and return components (water abstractions and discharges), the available water resources are obtained for a given territory during the discretization period of time. Specifically, the entire territory of Serbia has been divided into nineteen water management balance units to which the established water balance equations apply. The paper highlights interactions between water management balance units. Procedures for the definition of individual components of the established water balance equation are presented at the end of the paper.

The paper illustrates a practical example in which the developed concept is used to assess the water balance for a water management balance unit within the territory of Serbia.

Key words: water balance assessment, water management balance unit, water inputs, water abstractions, water returns, water discharges.

Introduction

This paper describes the methodology which was used to assess Serbia’s water balance. Since previous methodologies date back to the 1980-1988 period (1980 Methodology for Water Management Balance Assessments in the Republic of Serbia, Excluding Autonomous Provinces; 1984 Water Management Master Plan Development Methodology for the Autonomous Province of ; and 1988 Water Management Master Plan Development Methodology for the Autonomous Province of Kosovo), they had to be re-assessed and new methodologies developed, which rely on new knowledge, current data, and the present institutional organization of Serbia.

To develop a concept for the water management balance of Serbia, the types of data and methods for data collection and archiving had to be studied and evaluated.

The water management balance of an area is generally prepared for the following major purposes: 1. Systematic monitoring of quantity and quality variations in available surface water and groundwater resources, and of water abstractions and discharges for and by all users; 2. Updating, to reflect current knowledge and international trends; 3. Systematic monitoring of changes in water resources and provision of reliable data for the preparation of water regime management plans and water management master plans, and for timely undertaking of measures aimed at the conservation, protection and development of water resources; 4. Evaluation of current methods and procedures for collection of data for all elements of the water management balance and for recommending data acquisition and archiving improvements; 5. Definition of principles to be used in the selection of balance profiles and the territorial division of the country for purposes of management of available water resources; 6. Assessment of the availability and quality of water resources within various territories; and 7. Making recommendations for inter-institutional integration of all factors relevant to the water balance.

BALWOIS 2008 – Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia,-27,31 May 2008. 1 This paper presents the water balance equation and the division of Serbia into water management balance units.

Methodology for water management balance assessment

The development of a methodology for water balance assessment is difficult due to a number of practical problems. The methodology proposed for a water management balance assessment should apply to current conditions (problems associated with the scope and types of collected data), and should be adjustable to changes over space and time (problems associated with the requirements set out in the EU Water Framework Directive).

Hydrologic cycle, water balance, and water management balance

The hydrologic cycle is a global geophysical process which underlies the concept of hydrology; it reflects the principle of the maintenance of water mass in all of its three phases on Earth. In essence, the hydrologic cycle is a natural phenomenon which governs the global transformation of water between the atmosphere, biosphere and hydrosphere. Natural circulation of water constitutes the basis of renewable freshwater, in other words, the balance of water which is available for use in all human activities and by the plant and animal world on the planet.

The major components of this balance are: the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere (W), precipitation (P), evaporation (E ), runoff (Q), variation in surface water and groundwater volume (W), and groundwater flow (G) during a specific time interval.

The conventional and fundamental water-balance equation, which addresses all of the above parameters and applies to a limited watershed surface area (A), delineated by boundary (I), may be expressed as follows:

∂W 1 r E − P + Q + + Gndr = 0 (1) ∂t A ∫

Where, in addition to the above, n - is the unit vector perpendicular to the contour of the unit surface area, and t - is time.

Taking this equation as a starting point, the general water-balance equation for a single time interval Δt and a limited real unit surface area of the watershed may be expressed as:

P ─ E = Q + ΔG ± ΔW (2)

Where: P - is the total precipitation which reaches the unit surface area of the watershed during a given time interval; E - is the total evapotranspiration from the same surface area during the same time interval; Q - is the total runoff from the same surface area during the same time interval; ΔG - is the total groundwater flow for the same surface area during the same time interval; and ΔW - is the total change in surface water and groundwater volume within the same surface area during the same time interval.

The above parameters are known hydrologic quantities which can be calculated from hydrologic and meteorological data. However, from a water management perspective, the balance of water available within a watershed is only one of the major issues which water management and sustainable development address. The other major issue reflects the use of water in all spheres of human activity and water discharges from all types of water uses, which constitute a part of the so-called water management balance. In essence, as pointed out above, the water management balance is the ratio of available water resources (defined by the water balance) to used and discharged water, in terms of quantity and quality over time and space within a particular portion of the watershed, which results from the so-called Water Management Cycle, or the circulation of water from the point of abstraction for any type of use. Since the water is used but not expended, most of it returns to streams and the ground, whereby available water is increased by a level roughly equal to the difference between abstracted and discharged water.

Based on the above, the total abstraction for various uses (ΔQw) should be subtracted and the total discharge from all types of uses (ΔQr) should be added to the baseline water-balance equation. Consequently, the general water management balance equation for a unit catchment area becomes:

P ─ E = Q + ΔG ± ΔW + ΔQr - ΔQw (3)

The securing of optimum and sustainable control of the water management balance over time and space within a territory constitutes the essence of sustainable development, use, and management of renewable water resources within that territory.

Since a real catchment area or water district can have multiple inputs and outputs of surface water and groundwater, as well as several intakes for water uses and outlets of used water, the above water management balance equation acquires the following general form:

NIJPEZPOV w ul i−+−=+ iz j p p e e z z pov pov (4) ∑∑∑∑∑∑∑(Δ= V )n (V ) (V ) (V ) (V ) (V ) (V ) n======1111111 i j p e z pov

Where: N w is the change in total volume of groundwater and surface water within the water ∑(ΔV )n n=1 district; I ∑(Vul)i is the total inflow of groundwater and surface water into the water district; i=1 J ∑(Viz) j is the total outflow of groundwater and surface water from the water district; j=1 P ∑(Vp) p is the total precipitation which reaches the water district; p=1 E ∑(Ve)e is the total evapotranspiration from the water district; e=1 Z ∑(Vz)z is the total abstraction of water for all types of water uses within the water district; z=1 and, POV ∑(Vpov) pov is the total discharge of water from all types of water uses within the water pov=1 district.

These parameters of the water management balance reflect highly complex changes which occur during the process of formation, movement and use of water within a single water district. Some elements of these parameters are directly measurable (particularly quantitative and qualitative elements of surface water and abstracted/discharged water), while others are not measurable at all (such as those which relate to groundwater and evapotranspiration). Additionally, in nature, there is a major difference between the formation and movement of groundwater and surface water even though there is a direct interaction between them through infiltration and outflow processes. Keeping this in mind, the surface water balance and the groundwater balance are usually assessed separately in practice, but their interaction parameters are included in the water balance equations.

Division of the territory of Serbia into water management balance units

Serbia’s hydrologic network is very intricate because it consists of several major European rivers (such as the , Tisa, Sava, and Drina) which flow across its territory, a number of cross-border rivers (such as the Pčinja, Dragovištica, Jerma, Nišava, and Visočica), and several rivers in which originate in (e.g. the Zlatica, Begej, Tamiš, Brzava, Moravica, Rojga, Karaš and ). All rivers in the Province of Vojvodina (except the Sava) are intersected by primary and secondary canals of the Danube-Tisa-Danube Water System, while existing hydraulic structures (weirs, locks, pumping stations...) further complicate natural and artificial watercourse regimes in Vojvodina. Most major rivers within the territory of Serbia (such as the Morava, Nišava, Kolubara, Timok, Mlava, Pek, and Porečka River) constitute well-defined hydrographic entities. These rivers, in whole or in part, or joined into larger entities, are highly conducive to the formation of water management balance units.

The basic principles which govern the selection of these units in the development of the water management balance (WMB) for the entire territory of Serbia are as follows: - The WMB is prepared for clearly-defined watersheds (river basins, sub-basins or hydrographic entities); - The WMB is prepared for specific discretization time periods (10 days, month, season, year, etc.).

Additionally, the following factors play an important role in the selection of water management balance units:

- Surface relief and complexity of the hydrographic network; - Variations in the surface water regime and surface water quality along the river; - Geological and hydrogeological characteristics which affect the formation of groundwater; - Distribution of major users and polluters along the river; - Distribution and availability of surface water/groundwater and abstraction/discharge monitoring systems; - Physical configuration and functional completeness of existing and designed water management infrastructure; and, - Socio-political division of the territory and locations of national and provincial borders.

Based on these principles and factors, the entire territory of Serbia has been divided into 19 Water Management Balance Units (WMBUs), as follows:

1. WMBU 01: The Danube River Basin, from the Serbian-Hungarian border and the DTD WS canal to the mouth of the Tisa River in the Bačka region; . 2. WMBU 02: The Tisa River Basin, from the Serbian-Hungarian border to the dam at Novi Bečej; 3. WMBU 03: The Sava River Basin within the Srem region, excluding the northern slopes of Mt. Fruška Gora (which belong to the Danube River Basin); 4. WMBU 04: The DTD WS watershed in southern Banat, from Batoš to and the Nera River; 5. WMBU 05: The central Banat watershed, including the Begej and Tamiš rivers; 6. WMBU 06: The Danube River Basin – the Nadela Water System (Pančevo, Dubovac); 7. WMBU 07: The Belgrade watershed, within city limits; 8. WMBU 08: The Kolubara River Basin, to the Draževac Monitoring Station and WMBU 07 boundary; 9. WMBU 09: The immediate Drina River Basin, from Bajina Bašta to the mouth of the Drina, including catchment areas of creeks in the Mačva region to the Beljin MS on the Sava River; 10. WMBU 10: The immediate Drina River Basin to Bajina Bašta, including catchment areas of the Lim and rivers; 11. WMBU 11: The Ibar River Basin to Lopatnica Lakat; 12. WMBU 12: The West Morava River Basin to the City of Kraljevo; 13. WMBU 13: Portion of the River Basin, from Predejane to Korvin Grad; 14. WMBU 14: Portion of the South Morava River Basin, from Korvin Grad to Mojsinje, including the catchment area of the Nišava River; 15. WMBU 15: The Timok River Basin; 16. WMBU 16: The Velika Morava River Basin, from Mojsinje and Jasika to the mouth of the Velika Morava; 17. WMBU 17: Immediate catchment areas of the right tributaries of the Danube, from the mouth of the Velika Morava to the mouth of the Timok; 18. WMBU 18: Portion of the South Morava River Basin, from the Kosovo and Metohija border to Predejane, including the catchment areas of the Pčinja and Dragovištica rivers; and, 19. WMBU 19: Portion of the West Morava River Basin, from Kraljevo and Lopatnica Lakat to Jasika.

Figure 1 shows the division of Serbian territory into Water Management Balance Units. The map was prepared using GIS technology and ArcView software. GIS technology was applied to enter the positions of entry/exit profiles for each WMBU, as well as the positions of hydrologic, meteorological, climate and precipitation monitoring stations. Additionally, physical positions of all types of piezometers, water users and water polluters were identified.

Conclusion

The development of the basic concept for Serbia’s water management balance is a highly complex and time-consuming process because it requires voluminous data and inter-institutional coordination. In addition to surface-water hydrologic information from a large number of locations across Serbia, various inputs are needed, as is the collation of data about numerous factors which define the water regime (topographic inputs, statistical inputs, groundwater data, abstraction data, discharge data, and the like). Current water monitoring in Serbia is not sufficient for concrete calculations. Groundwater is monitored by means of 430 piezometers, but only to a depth of 30 m (formal network of the Serbian Hydro-Meteorological Service); the scope of the monitoring is rather narrow and there are no deeper piezometers. The Iron Gate HPNS monitoring network is rather extensive but its piezometers are used to monitor the backwater created by the Iron Gate project. Serbia’s piezometric network is currently in the process of being re-assessed and plans are being drawn to revitalize it. The surface-water monitoring network is much better distributed; it consists of 130 surface water monitoring stations, 61 of which are reporting stations. Reporting stations collect data in real time.

Water abstractions and discharges pose a major problem because the data are often unreliable or non-existent. Based on current legislation, this information has to be provided by users. However, the types of data are inconsistent and water abstractions and discharges are often estimated instead of measured, because of a lack of necessary instruments.

A more serious approach to water balance assessments would require the following: 1. Enactment of a new Water Law and complementary by-laws which regulate major water issues in the long-term; 2. Institutionalization of a long-term and ongoing commitment to the development and control of the water management balance using reliable inputs; 3. Development of a precise plan for the assessment and control of the water management balance, including setting of priorities; 4. The setting up of institutions and the accurate definition of their roles and duties in the assessment of the water management balance; and, 5. The gradual strengthening of human resources and equipping of all institutions which participate in the assessment of the water management balance, whereby roughly the same level of capability is provided.

References

1. Prohaska, S., Miloradov, M.,.: Basic Methodology Concept for Creation of Water Resources Management Balance in Vojvodina, 23rd Conference of the Danube Countries on the Hydrological Forecasting and Hydrological Bases of Water Management, Belgrade, 28-31, August 2006 2. Stevanović, Z., Hajdin, B., Vujasinović, S., Đurić, D., Tripković, M.: (in Serbian) Hydrologic investigations needed to assess the water balance and groundwater reserves in Serbia , 36th Conference on Current Water Use and Water Protection Problems „Water 2007”, 26 to 29 June 2007, , p. 169-174, 2007 3. Prohaska, S., Ristić, V.: Water balance in the central part of the Balkan Peninsula, BALWOIS – Conference on Water Observation and Information System for Decision Support, 23-26 May 2006, Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia, CD, 8 pages, 2006 4. Majkic, B., Prohaska, S : Ecological Status of the Nadela River Catchment Area in Accordance with the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Symposium - Bottlenecks, Solutions and Priorities in the Context of Functions of Forest Resources, Istanbul, Turkey, 2007 5. Group of authors (from Serbia Kapor, B., Petkovic, T., Prohaska, S., Srna, P.): Basin-Wide water balance in the Danube River Basin, The Danube and its Basin – Hydrological Monograph Follow-up Volume VIII, IHP UNESCO and Water Research Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia, 2006 6. Prohaska, S: (in Serbian) Hydrology, Part II: Hydrologic Forecasting, Modeling and Applications, Monograph, Jaroslav Černi Institute for the Development of Water Resources; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mining and Geology; and Hydro-Meteorological Service of Serbia, Belgrade, 2006 7. Water Management Master Plan of Serbia (in Serbian), Jaroslav Černi Institute for the Development of Water Resources, Belgrade, 2001 8. Methodology for Water Management Balance Assessment in the Republic of Serbia, Excluding the Autonomous Provinces (in Serbian), Jaroslav Černi Institute for the Development of Water Resources, Belgrade, 1980 9. Methodology for Water Management Balance Assessment in the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina (in Serbian), Jaroslav Černi Institute for the Development of Water Resources, Belgrade, 1987 10. Water for the 21st Century (Study, in Serbian), Jaroslav Černi Institute for the Development of Water Resources, Belgrade, 2000