How to Look at Eucalypts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How to Look at Eucalypts How to Look at Eucalypts Species name: __________________________________________ Growth habit: tree or mallee Bark type: rough or smooth If rough: wholly rough or partly rough Pith: glandular or not glandular Leaves Juvenile leaves (if present): opposite or alternate - petiolate or sessile - green or glaucous Adult leaves: opposite or alternate - lanceolate or rounded or other shape same color on both sides or different colors on both sides Leaf venation: side veins few or side veins many parallel or acute or obtuse Leaf oil glands: obvious obscured Flowers Inforescence type: branched at shoot tips or umbel in leaf axil branched in leaf axils or solitary fowers Average number of buds per umbel: ___________ Peduncle: round in cross-section or fattened (strap-like) Flower buds: sessile or pedicellate operculum scar present or absent glaucous or green Stamens Stamen color: all stamens with anthers or outer stamens missing anthers horn shaped Operculum and bud shapes: horn shaped beaked rounded conical bud diamond buds horn bud spindle bud club shaped shaped shaped shaped Fruit Glaucous or not glaucous sessile or pedicellate Fruit diameter: ___________ Fruit shape: Barrel Hemispherical Funnel Urn Spherical Cup Fruit Disk: level or ascending or descending broad or thin Fruit Valves: enclosed or rim level or exserted Other Notable Features: Key to Commonly Cultivated Eucalypts 1. Leaves lighter green on the underside 2. Bark rough, hard, thin, faky; fruit 3/4 in. diameter or more—Red Flowering Gum (Corymbia fcifolia) 2’ Bark rough, sof, thick, fbrous; fruit 1/2 in. diameter or less—Swamp Mahogany (Eucalyptus robusta) 2’’ Bark smooth 3. Bark with orange blotches; mature fruit ridged; Sugar Gum Red Flowering Gum fruit valves sunken inside fruit—Sugar Gum (Eucalyptus cladocalyx) (Corymbia ficifolia) (Eucalyptus cladocalyx) 3’ Bark bluish gray; mature fruit smooth; valves of fruit exserted, 4. Valves 4 or 5, curved inward; buds and fruit ofen glaucous—Rose Gum (Eucalyptus grandis) 4’ Valves usually 4, erect; buds and fruit not Swamp Mahogany glaucous—Sydney Blue Gum (Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus robusta) saligna) Flooded Gum Eucalyptus grandis Sydney Blue Gum 1’ Leaves the same color on both sides; and bark rough, furrowed, retained on trunk and limbs (Eucalyptus saligna) (there is a 1’’ option on the backside) 5. Leaves silver or bluish silver in color 6. Leaves attached oppositely; fower buds and fruit grouped in threes—Argyle Apple (Eucalyptus cinerea) 6’ Leaves attached alternately, mostly less than 1/2 in. wide at widest point—Narrow-Leaf Peppermint (Eucalyptus nicholii) 6’’ Leaves attached alternately, mostly 3/4 in. wide or wider 7. Bark dark brown to black, very rough and deeply furrowed— Narrow-Leaf Peppermint Argyle Apple Red Iron Bark (Eucalyptus sideroxylon) (Eucalyptus nicholii) (Eucalyptus cinerea) 7’ Bark light brown or gray, and scraggly; leaves round or only slightly longer than wide; fowers white—Silver Dollar Gum (Eucalyptus polyanthemos) 7’’ Bark light brown or gray, and scraggly; leaves 3 to 4 times longer than broad; fowers pink—Coral Gum (Eucalyptus torquata) 5’ Leaves green Flooded Gum 8. Leaves mostly less than 1/2 in. wide at widest point— (Eucalyptus rudis) Narrow Leaf Peppermint (Eucalyptus nicholii) 8’ Leaves mostly 3/4 in. wide or wider; bark gray, fnely Silver Dollar Gum Coral Gum (Eucalyptus polyanthemos) furrowed; all stamens with anthers—Flooded Gum (Eucalyptus torquata) (Eucalyptus rudis) 8’’ Leaves mostly 3/4 in. wide or wider; bark dark brown to black, very rough and deeply furrowed; some stamens without anthers—Red Iron Bark (Eucalyptus sideroxylon) Red Iron Bark Flooded Gum (Eucalyptus sideroxylon) (Eucalyptus rudis) 1’’ Leaves the same color on both sides; and bark smooth, shedding (sometimes with imperfectly shed rough bark on the basal area of trunk) 9. Buds and fruit produced singly; leaves over 8 in. long—Blue Gum (Eucalyptus globulus) 9’ Buds and fruit clustered in threes or more; leaves less than 6 in. long, smelling like lemon when crushed—Lemon Scented Gum (Corymbia citriodora) 9’’ Buds and fruit clustered in threes or more; leaves less than 6 in. long, smelling medicinal or spicy when crushed (but not like lemon) Lemon Scented Gum Blue Gum 10. Leaves silver, bluish silver, or bluish-gray in color (covered (Corymbia citriodora) (Eucalyptus globulus) with wax) 11. Shrub with several trunks; all leaves opposite, without a leaf stalk—Silver Mountain Gum (Eucalyptus pulverulenta) 11’ Tree with one trunk; some leaves alternate, stalked; buds and fruits in simple clusters of three in leaf axils—Cider Gum (Eucalyptus gunnii) 11’’ Tree with one trunk; some leaves alternate, stalked; buds and fruits in branched clusters of seven at shoot tips—Silver Dollar Gum (Eucalyptus polyanthemos) Cider Gum Silver Mountain Gum 10’ Leaves green, olive green, or dark green (not waxy) (Eucalyptus gunnii) (Eucalyptus pulverulenta) 12. Leaves egg-shaped or round, barely twice as long as wide; buds and fruit fused into a spherical cluster the size of a small fst—Spider Gum (Eucalyptus conferruminata) 12’ Leaves shaped like a long spearhead, 3 to 4 times longer than wide; buds and fruit not fused 13. Buds and fruit in clusters of fve or more (usually seven) 14. Bud hemispheric, with a distinct beak; branches ofen drooping— Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) 14’ Bud horn-shaped or conical, not beaked; branches ofen steeply ascending—Forest Red Gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) 13’ Buds and fruit always in clusters of three 15. Bark shed in long slender ribbons; buds with a short stalk; all Spider Gum stamens with anthers—Ribbon Gum (Eucalyptus viminalis) (Eucalyptus conferruminata) 15’ Bark shed in plates or patches; buds borne on a long slender stalk; some stamens without anthers—White Iron Bark (Eucalyptus leucoxylon) Red Gum (Eucalyptus Manna Gum camaldulensis) (Eucalyptus viminalis) White Iron Bark (Eucalyptus leucoxylon) Treatment for the genus Eucalytpus for the 2nd Edition of the Jepson Manual Matt Ritter, 2012 MYRTACEAE MYRTLE FAMILY [Subshrub] shrub, tree, trunk bark smooth or scaly; glands 0 or embedded in epidermis. LF: opposite or alternate, persistent, gen glandular when young. INFL FL: gen bisexual, parts in 4s, 5s, gen ± white; hypanthium exceeding ovary or not; stamens gen many; ovary [rarely superior to] inferior, 2–5(18)-chambered; placentas axil- lary, just below top, or basal, ovules few to many, gen in 2–many series. FR: berry, capsule, nut. SEED: 1–many; coat membra- nous to ± leathery or hard, bony; embryo starchy or oily (of great taxonomic importance). 100 genera, ± 3500 spp.: many spp. trop Am, Australasia, fewer Afr, s Asia; economically important for timber (Eucalyptus), spices (Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. & L.M. Perry, cloves; Pimenta dioica (L.) Merr., allspice), edible frs (Psidium guajava L., guava; Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) Burret, pineapple guava), many orns (Eucalyptus, Melaleuca, several other genera). [McVaugh 1968 Taxon 17:354–418] Apparently of Gondwanan origins; trop, subtrop, Medit climates. Luma apiculata (DC.) Burret, Myrtus communis L., Syzygium australe 1. Fr a berry; seeds often > 5 mm; lvs gen opposite (whorled). 2. Calyx lobes, petals 5; seed coat shiny, hard................................................. [MYRTUS] 2´ Calyx lobes, petals 4; seed coat membranous 3. Ripe fr dark purple; seeds gen > 1, lenticular; colyledons ± = embryonic st ............ ........... [LUMA] 3´ Ripe fr red or purple; seed gen 1, spheric; cotyledons >> embryonic st ....................... [SYZYGIUM] 1´ Fr a capsule or nut; seeds gen 1–3 mm; mature lvs alternate or opposite 4. ............................... EUCALYPTUS 4´ Perianth parts free in bud, each segment persistent or falling separately 5. Fls in a dense cylindrical cluster surrounding st at tip or just below; stamens several × > perianth . MELALEUCA 5´ Fls 1 or in small clusters, not surrounding st; stamens ≤ perianth 6. Lvs opposite, linear or awl-shaped; fr a 1-chambered nut; style with ring of hairs just below stigma ................................. ............................ [CHAMELAUCIUM] 6´ Lvs alternate, oblanceolate to obovate-oblong; fr a many-chambered capsule; style glabrous ............................................................... LEPTOSPERMUM EUCALYPTUS EUCALYPTUS, GUM TREE Matt Ritter Tree, shrub. ST: gen erect; bark shedding, smooth, or persistent near base (occ) or throughout, rough; twigs gen round. LF: juvenile gen opposite, horizontal, sessile, ± cordate, entire, glaucous; adult gen alternate, vertical, petioled, ± lanceolate, entire, glandular, glabrous, gen same color on both sides. INFL such umbels. FL several series, gen all fertile, white (yellow, red, pink); ovary chambers 3–6, fused to hypanthium. FR: capsule, thick-walled, woody, gen smooth, gen dehiscing at top. SEED: gen 1–3 mm, wind-dispersed. ± 700 spp.: most endemic to Australia; > 250 spp. Cult in CA; important for oils, tannins, timber, orns. (Greek: true cap, for bud cap) [Brooker 2000 Austral Syst Bot E. pulverulenta Sims excluded, cult only. 1. 2. Lvs lanceolate, lemon-scented; bark smooth ............................................... E. citriodora 2´ Lvs ovate, elliptic, or round, not lemon-scented; bark rough ............................... E. polyanthemos 1´ 3. Fls 1 in lf axils, ± sessile; fr glaucous, > 1.5 cm wide ......................................... E. globulus 3´ Fls 3–many in stalked umbels; fr not glaucous, < 1 cm wide 4. Bark deeply furrowed, dark brown to ± black; anthers 0 on outer stamens ..................... E. sideroxylon
Recommended publications
  • Eucalyptus Robusta NZ Myrtaceae Key - Online Edition Eucalyptus Robusta Sm
    11/16/2020 Eucalyptus robusta NZ Myrtaceae Key - Online edition Eucalyptus robusta Sm. Common Names swamp mahogany, swamp messmate Origin Australia: coastal New South Wales to south-eastern Queensland. Cultivation In New Zealand predominantly cultivated for timber or amenity; very occasionally naturalised from nearby specimens. Distribution Mainly in northern coastal and lowland areas in the North Island of New Zealand. Distinguishing Features Tree with thick, fibrous, spongy, reddish-brown to grey-brown bark with deep longitudinal furrows, extending to the small branches. Mature leaves that are glossy, darker green on the upper side, paler beneath, strongly feather-veined. Long-stalked, spindle- or pear-shaped flower buds to 20 mm long and 9 mm wide, in clusters of 9–15. Fruit that are woody capsules, long-stalked, cylindrical to 18 mm long and 11 mm wide, with disc descending inside rim of capsule, and the three or four valve tips joined across the mouth of the capsule. Habit Tree to 30 m tall. Bark and Stem/Trunk Bark of main trunk thick, fibrous, spongy, reddish-brown to grey-brown, in elongated slabs with furrows between, extending to the small branches; ribbons absent. Hairs and adventitious roots absent. Young stems square in cross-section, sometimes winged. Leaves Mature leaves alternate, stalked, broadly lanceolate to ovate, feather-veined, tip pointed, base tapering to leaf stalk, glossy, dark green above and paler below, hairs absent, 85–170 mm long, 25–70 mm wide. Vein reticulation moderate to dense, main side-veins at a relatively wide angle to the midrib, intramarginal veins present just inside margin; oil glands usually inconspicuous; leaf stalk 15–30 mm long.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying-Fox Dispersal Feasibility Study Cassia Wildlife Corridor, Coolum Beach and Tepequar Drive Roost, Maroochydore
    Sunshine Coast Council Flying-Fox Dispersal Feasibility Study Cassia Wildlife Corridor, Coolum Beach and Tepequar Drive Roost, Maroochydore. Environmental Operations May 2013 0 | Page Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Flying-fox Mitigation Strategies .......................................................................................................... 2 State and Federal Permits ................................................................................................................... 4 Roost Management Plan .................................................................................................................... 4 Risk ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Flying-fox Dispersal Success in Australia ............................................................................................. 6 References .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Cassia Wildlife Corridor ................................................................................................................ 8 Background ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Senex Energy Ltd
    Senex Energy Ltd Project Atlas EPBC Referral – Water Report Volume 4 Appendix II D10171A04 October 2018 Senex Energy Ltd Water Report Project Atlas – EPBC Referral Final APPENDIX II Terrestrial GDEs Report 181030R_EPBC Water Report.docx D10171A04 October 2018 Client name Project Month 2015 Senex Project Atlas Terrestrial GDE Assessment Report Wandoan, Queensland Report prepared for Hydrobiology July 2018 1807_AUSEC_Hydrobiology_SenexAtlas_GDEReport_Rev2.docx P a g e | i Hydrobiology Senex Project Atlas Terrestrial GDE Assessment July 2018 This document has been prepared and is certified by: AUSECOLOGY PTY LTD ABN 15 155 304 751 PO Box 594, Morningside, QLD 4170 w www.ausecology.com e [email protected] Document status Revision Reason for issue Author Reviewed Issued to Date A Internal Draft Rohan Etherington Ralf Regeer - 08/08/2018 Hydrobiology 0 Issued to client Rohan Etherington Ralf Regeer 09/08/2018 KCB Revised from 1 Rohan Etherington Ralf Regeer Senex 28/08/2018 KCB comments Revised from 2 Rohan Etherington Ralf Regeer Senex 04/10/2018 Senex comments 1807_AUSEC_Hydrobiology_SenexAtlas_GDEReport_Rev2.docx P a g e | i Hydrobiology Senex Project Atlas Terrestrial GDE Assessment July 2018 Table of contents Glossary of Terms and Acronyms ______________________________________________________________ iv Executive Summary __________________________________________________________________________ v 1 Introduction ___________________________________________________________________________ 1 Background ____________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Expressway Master Plant List
    MASTER PLANT LIST GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO PLANT LISTS Plants are living organisms. They possess variety in form, foliage and flower color, visual texture and ultimate size. There is variation in plants of the same species. Plants change: with seasons, with time and with the environment. Yet here is an attempt to categorize and catalogue a group of plants well suited for highway and expressway planting in Santa Clara County. This is possible because in all the existing variety of plants, there still remains a visual, morphological and taxonomical distinction among them. The following lists and identification cards emphasize these distinctions. 1 of 6 MASTER PLANT LIST TREES Acacia decurrens: Green wattle Acacia longifolia: Sydney golden wattle Acacia melanoxylon: Blackwood acacia Acer macrophyllum: Bigleaf maple Aesculus californica: California buckeye Aesculus carnea: Red horsechestnut Ailanthus altissima: Tree-of-heaven Albizia julibrissin: Silk tree Alnus cordata: Italian alder Alnus rhombifolia: White alder Arbutus menziesii: Madrone Calocedrus decurrens: Incense cedar Casuarina equisetifolia: Horsetail tree Casuarina stricta: Coast beefwood Catalpa speciosa: Western catalpa Cedrus deodara: Deodar cedar Ceratonia siliqua: Carob Cinnamomum camphora: Camphor Cordyline australis: Australian dracena Crataegus phaenopyrum: Washington thorn Cryptomeria japonica: Japanese redwood Cupressus glabra: Arizona cypress Cupressus macrocarpa: Monterey cypress Eriobotrya japonica: Loquat Eucalyptus camaldulensis: Red gum Eucalyptus citriodora: Lemon-scented
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Foxes Jerry Copy
    Species Common Name Habit Flowering Fruit Notes Acacia macradenia Zigzag wattle Shrub August Possible pollen source Albizia lebbek Lebbek Tall tree summer Source of nectar. Excellent shade tree for large gardens. Alphitonia excelsa Red ash Tree October to March November to May Food source for Black and Grey- headed flying fox Angophora costata Smooth-barked Tall tree December to Source of nectar apple January Angophora Rough-barked apple Tall tree September to Source of nectar floribunda February Angophora costata Smooth-barked Tall tree November to Source of nectar subsp. leiocarpa apple, Rusty gum February Archontophoenix Alexander palm Tree-like November to January Food source for alexandrae December Spectacled flying fox. Good garden tree Archontophoenix Bangalow palm Tree-like February to June March to July Food source for cunninghamiana Grey-headed flying fox. Good garden tree Species Common Name Habit Flowering Fruit Notes Banksia integrifolia Coastal Shrub or small tree Recurrent, all year Food source for honeysuckle round Black and Grey- headed flying fox. Good garden tree Banksia serrata Old man banksia Shrub or small tree February to May Source of nectar. Good garden tree Buckinghamia Ivory curl tree Small tree December to Possible source of celsissima February nectar. Good garden tree Callistemon citrinus Crimson bottlebrush Shrub or small tree November and Source of nectar. March Good garden tree Callistemon salignus White bottlebrush Shrub or small tree spring Source of nectar. Good garden tree Castanospermum Moreton Bay Tall tree spring Source of nectar australe chestnut, Black bean Corymbia citriodora Lemon-scented gum Tall tree may flower in any Source of nectar season Corymbia Red bloodwood From mallee to tall summer to autumn Source of nectar gummifera tree Corymbia Pink bloodwood Tall tree December to March Source of nectar.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Flammability Across the Vascular Plant Phylogeny, with Special Emphasis on the Genus Dracophyllum
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Patterns of flammability across the vascular plant phylogeny, with special emphasis on the genus Dracophyllum A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy at Lincoln University by Xinglei Cui Lincoln University 2020 Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy. Abstract Patterns of flammability across the vascular plant phylogeny, with special emphasis on the genus Dracophyllum by Xinglei Cui Fire has been part of the environment for the entire history of terrestrial plants and is a common disturbance agent in many ecosystems across the world. Fire has a significant role in influencing the structure, pattern and function of many ecosystems. Plant flammability, which is the ability of a plant to burn and sustain a flame, is an important driver of fire in terrestrial ecosystems and thus has a fundamental role in ecosystem dynamics and species evolution. However, the factors that have influenced the evolution of flammability remain unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts IUFRO Eucalypt Conference 2015
    21-24 October,2015 | Zhanjiang, Guangdong, CHINA Scientific cultivation and green development to enhance the sustainability of eucalypt plantations Abstracts IUFRO Eucalypt Conference 2015 October 2015 IUFRO Eucalypt Conference 2015 Sponsorer Host Organizer Co-organizer 金光集团 PART Ⅰ Oral Presentations Current Situation and Development of Eucalyptus Research in China 1 Management of Forest Plantations under Abiotic and Biotic Stresses in a Perspective of Climate Change 2 Eucalypts, Carbon Mitigation and Water 3 Effects of Forest Policy on Plantation Development 4 Nutrient Management of Eucalypt Plantations in Southern China 5 Quality Planning for Silviculture Operations Involving Eucalyptus Culture in Brazil 6 Eucahydro: Predicting Eucalyptus Genotypes Performance under Contrasting Water Availability Conditions Using Ecophysiological and Genomic Tools 7 Transpiration, Canopy Characteristics and Wood Growth Influenced by Spacing in Three Highly Productive Eucalyptus Clones 8 Challenges to Site Management During Large-scale Transition from Acacia mangium to Eucalyptus pellita in Short Rotation Forestry on Mineral Soils in Sumatra, Indonesia 9 Operational Issues in Growing Eucalyptus in South East Asia: Lessons in Cooperation 10 Nutrition Studies on Eucalyptus pellita in the Wet Tropics 11 Sustainable Agroforestry Model for Eucalypts Grown as Pulp Wood Tree on Farm Lands in India–An ITC Initiative 12 Adaptability and Performance of Industrial Eucalypt Provenances at Different Ecological Zones of Iran 13 Nutrient Management of Eucalyptus pellita
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity in Host Preference of Rotylenchus Spp. Y.S
    International Journal of Science, Environment ISSN 2278-3687 (O) and Technology, Vol. 7, No 5, 2018, 1786 – 1793 2277-663X (P) DIVERSITY IN HOST PREFERENCE OF ROTYLENCHUS SPP. Y.S. Rathore Principal Scientist (Retd.), Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur -208024 (U.P.) E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Species of the genus Rotylenchus are ecto- or semi-endo parasites and feed on roots of their host plants. In the study it was found that 50% species of Rotylenchus were monophagous and mostly on plants in the clade Rosids followed by monocots, Asterids and gymnosperms. In general, Rosids and Asterids combined parasitized more than 50% host species followed by monocots. Though food preference was species specific but by and large woody plants were preferred from very primitive families like Magnoliaceae and Lauraceae to representatives of advanced families. Woody plants like pines and others made a substantial contribution in the host range of Rotylenchus. Maximum number of Rotylenchus species harboured plants in families Poaceae (monocots), Rosaceae (Rosids) and Oleaceae (Asterids) followed by Fabaceae, Fagaceae, Asteraceae and Pinaceae. It is, therefore, suggested that agricultural crops should be grown far away from wild vegetation and forest plantations. Keywords: Rotylenchus, Magnoliids, Rosids, Asterids, Gymnosperms, Host preference. INTRODUCTION Species of the genus Rotylenchus (Nematoda: Haplolaimidae) are migratory ectoparasites and browse on the surface of roots. The damage caused by them is usually limited to necrosis of penetrated cells (1). However, species with longer stylet penetrate to tissues more deeply and killing more cells and called as semi-endoparasites (2,3). The genus contains 97 nominal species which parasitize on a wide range of wild and cultivated plants worldwide (3).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plant Species List of Plant Species
    List of plant species List of Plant Species Contents Amendment history .......................................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Application ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Relationship with planning scheme ..................................................................................... 3 1.3 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Aim ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Who should use this manual? ............................................................................................. 3 2 Special consideration ....................................................................................................................... 3 3 Variations ......................................................................................................................................... 4 4 Relationship ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Appendix A – Explanatory notes & definitions .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guava (Eucalyptus) Rust Puccinia Psidii
    INDUSTRY BIOSECURITY PLAN FOR THE NURSERY & GARDEN INDUSTRY Threat Specific Contingency Plan Guava (eucalyptus) rust Puccinia psidii Plant Health Australia March 2009 Disclaimer The scientific and technical content of this document is current to the date published and all efforts were made to obtain relevant and published information on the pest. New information will be included as it becomes available, or when the document is reviewed. The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. Further information For further information regarding this contingency plan, contact Plant Health Australia through the details below. Address: Suite 5, FECCA House 4 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 Email: [email protected] Website: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au PHA & NGIA | Contingency Plan – Guava rust (Puccinia psidii) 1 Purpose and background of this contingency plan .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Tree Seedlings Are Available to Order from the State of Hawaii Division of Forestry and Wildlife, State Tree Nursery
    The following tree seedlings are available to order from the State of Hawaii Division of Forestry and Wildlife, State Tree Nursery: Scientific Name: Common Name: Dibble/ Pot size: Acacia koa……………………… Koa……………………………….. Small Acacia koaia……………………... Koai’a……………………………. Small Araucaria columnaris…………….. Norfolk-island Pine……………… Small Cryptomeria japonica……………. Sugi Pine………………………… Small Cupressus lusitanica……………... Mexican Cypress………………… Small Cupressus macrocarpa…………… Monterey Cypress……………….. Small Cupressus simpervirens………….. Italian Cypress…………………… Medium Eucalyptus deglupta……………… Rainbow Bark……………………. Small Eucalyptus robusta……………….. Swamp Mahogany……………….. Small Metrosideros polymorpha……….. Ohia……………………………… Medium or 3” pot Pinus elliotii……………………… Slash Pine………………………... Small Pinus radiata……………………... Monterey Pine…………………… Small Podocarpus sp……………………. Podocarpus………………………. 3” pot Santalum sp……………………… Sandalwood……………………… Medium or 3” pot Tristania conferta………………… Brush Box………………………... Small Acacia koa (Koa): This large hardwood tree is endemic to the Hawaiian Islands. The tree has exceeded 100 ft in height with basal diameter far beyond 50 inches in old growth stands. The wood is prized for furniture and canoe works. This legume has pods with black seeds for reproduction. The wood has similar properties to that of black walnut. The yellow flowers are borne in dense round heads about 2@ in diameter. Tree growth is best above 800 ft; seems to grow best in the ‘Koa belt’ which is situated at an elevation range between 3,500 - 6,000 ft. It is often found in areas where there is fog in the late afternoons. It should be planted in well- drained fertile soils. Grazing animals relish the Koa foliage, so young seedlings should be protected Acacia koaia (Koaia): Related to the Koa, Koaia is native to Hawaii. The leaves and flowers are much the same as Koa.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants of Sydney Harbour National Park: Historical Records and Species Lists, and Their Value for Conservation Monitoring
    Native plants of Sydney Harbour National Park: historical records and species lists, and their value for conservation monitoring Doug Benson National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens, Mrs Macquaries Rd, Sydney 2000 AUSTRALIA [email protected] Abstract: Sydney Harbour National Park (lat 33° 53’S; long 151° 13’E), protects significant vegetation on the harbour foreshores close to Sydney City CBD; its floristic abundance and landscape beauty has been acknowledged since the writings of the First Fleet in 1788. Surprisingly, although historical plant collections were made as early as1802, and localised surveys have listed species for parts of the Park since the 1960s, a detailed survey of the flora of whole Park is still needed. This paper provides the first definitive list of the c.400 native flora species for Sydney Harbour National Park (total area 390 ha) showing occurrence on the seven terrestrial sub-regions or precincts (North Head, South Head, Dobroyd Head, Middle Head, Chowder Head, Bradleys Head and Nielsen Park). The list is based on historical species lists, records from the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage (formerly Dept of Environment, Climate Change and Water) Atlas, National Herbarium of New South Wales specimen details, and some additional fieldwork. 131 species have only been recorded from a single precinct site and many are not substantiated with a recent herbarium specimen (though there are historical specimens from the general area for many). Species reported in the sources but for which no current or historic specimen exists are listed separately as being of questionable/non-local status.
    [Show full text]