DOCSLIB.ORG

Examining Undergraduate Attitudes Towards Bisexuality and Bisexual Individuals Charae A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Examining Undergraduate Attitudes Towards Bisexuality and Bisexual Individuals Charae A McNair Scholars Research Journal Volume 7 | Issue 1 Article 10 Examining Undergraduate Attitudes Towards Bisexuality and Bisexual Individuals Charae A. London-Terry Eastern Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.emich.edu/mcnair Recommended Citation London-Terry, Charae A. () "Examining Undergraduate Attitudes Towards Bisexuality and Bisexual Individuals," McNair Scholars Research Journal: Vol. 7: Iss. 1, Article 10. Available at: http://commons.emich.edu/mcnair/vol7/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the McNair Scholars Program at DigitalCommons@EMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in McNair Scholars Research Journal by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@EMU. For more information, please contact lib- [email protected]. London-Terry: Examining Undergraduate Attitudes Towards Bisexuality and Bisexual Individuals EXAMINING UNDERGRADUATE ATTITUDES TOWARDS BISEXUALITY AND BISEXUAL INDIVIDUALS Charae A. London-Terry Dr. Jeanne Thomas, Mentor Dr. Yvette Colón, Mentor ABSTRACT Despite the great strides that the Lesbian and Gay (LG) community has made in the last four decades, bisexual individuals still “report a lack of validation, isolation and ostracism within both the heterosexual and homosexual communities” (Israel & Mohr, 2004, p. 119). This study focuses on undergraduate students’ attitudes towards bisexuality and bisexual individuals at Eastern Michigan University by testing the hypothesis that homosexual and heterosexual students will have a significant bias towards bisexual persons, and that male students will demonstrate bias towards bisexual persons, regardless of their own sexual orientation. The survey instrument was an 18-item questionnaire revised from the Biphobia Scale, which presented Likert scale response options paired with statements describing stereotypical bisexual traits. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to see significance between groups, followed by a Tukey post hoc test. Recommendations will include counseling techniques for social workers and other supporting professionals who counsel bisexual persons. INTRODUCTION On May 17, 2004, Massachusetts became the first state to legalize same-sex marriage (Freedom to Marry, 2014). Since then, the perception of the LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning) community has changed dramatically, both in media representation and in policy. LGBTQ issues are being 101 Published by DigitalCommons@EMU, 1 McNair Scholars Research Journal, Vol. 7 [], Iss. 1, Art. 10 Charae A. London-Terry discussed on television shows, in the news, and in court cases at the state and federal levels. After the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court on June 26, 2013, seventeen states changed their policies, allowing same-sex couples to wed (Freedom to Marry, 2014). However, as the heterosexual world’s perspective towards same-sex marriage changed, the LGBTQ community was facing internal turmoil. “Bisexual individuals have reported a lack of validation, isolation and ostracism within both the heterosexual and lesbian/gay communities” (Israel & Mohr, 2004, p. 119). The U.S Department of Health and Human Services (2013) defines bisexuality as “a person who is attracted to someone of another or same gender.” Israel and Mohr (2004) noted, “Some individuals may question the legitimacy of bisexuality because of an understanding of bisexuality as a pure 50/50 split” (p. 121). The “50/50 split” refers to the assumption that bisexual persons are equally attracted to same sex and opposite sex people. In actuality, the ways in which a bisexual person could be attracted to another person are virtually unlimited. Bisexuality can be seen as “the potential to be attracted—romantically and/or sexually—to people of more than one sex and/or gender, not necessarily at the same time, not necessarily in the same way, and not necessarily to the same degree” (Ochs & Rowley, 2009, p. 8). The lack of clear understanding has caused some doubt about whether bisexuality is a “valid” sexual orientation. This could be related to how heterosexuality and homosexuality dominate the manner in which sexuality is interrupted and defined (Wilde, 2014). Thus, bisexual self-identification is not sufficient to support validity. “Insufficient social validation, including lack of bisexual role models and communities, was hypothesized to contribute to [the questioning identity stage]” (Brown, 2008, p. 76). The questioning identity stage describes the confusion people may experience when starting to realize that they are neither heterosexual nor homosexual. Firestein (2007) also noted that “it is crucial for therapists to understand how experiences with social invalidation contribute to psychological distress” (p. 212). Validation opens the doors to social awareness, thus providing the possibility for social groups/networks to form. 102 http://commons.emich.edu/mcnair/vol7/iss1/10 2 London-Terry: Examining Undergraduate Attitudes Towards Bisexuality and Bisexual Individuals Examining Undergraduate Attitudes Towards Bisexuality and Bisexual Individuals Bisexuals often experience a series of challenges, including erasure and invisibility. Bisexual erasure refers to “invisibility, misrecognition through distortion, or condemnation through moral devaluation” (Klesse, 2011, p. 227). Bisexual invisibility refers to the “ assumption that people are either heterosexual or homosexual, or assuming people’s sexuality on the basis of their current partner” (Barker, Richards, Jones, Bowes-Catton, & Plowman, 2012, p. 4). Minorities often lack power in U.S. society and may conform to the social conventions of majority culture. Bisexuals, or those questioning their sexual orientation, may feel confused “as a result [of] the need to change to a lesbian or gay self-label in order to be accepted in homosexual communities” (Brown, 2002, p. 76). The LG community has fought for visibility and social acceptance even before the 1964 Stonewall Riots. An example of this is the Mattachine Society, an advocacy group for gay men founded in Northern California during the early 1950s (Federal Bureau of Investigation: Mattachine Society, 1953). Further, due to growing visibility, social acceptance, and empirical evidence, in 1973 the American Psychiatric Association (APA) removed the diagnosis “homosexuality” from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM; Spitzer, 1973). As Morgenstern writes: Though many bisexuals have fought on the front lines of the gay rights movement, it appears that [they] have only token representation in the com- munity; the word ‘bisexual’ has been added to the masthead, but [they aren’t] truly included or accept- ed in the community (Morgenstern, 2008, p. 72). Theoretical Explanations of Bisexuality During the 19th century, the term bisexual “was used in fields of anatomy and physiology to refer to life forms” (MacDowall, 2009, p. 4) with androgynous genitalia. During the 20th century, Inversion Theory, also known as sexual inversion, was described in Freud’s work on sexuality (Freud, 1905, 1975). 103 Published by DigitalCommons@EMU, 3 McNair Scholars Research Journal, Vol. 7 [], Iss. 1, Art. 10 Charae A. London-Terry Freud listed three types of “inverts”: Absolute Invert, Amphigenic Invert and the Contingent Invert. Freud proposed that Amphigenic Inverts (bisexuals) “[were] psychosexual hermaphrodites [whose] sexual objects may equally well be of their own or of the opposite sex. This kind of inversion thus lacks the characteristics of exclusiveness” (Freud, 1905, 1975, p. 2). Using Inversion Theory to explain bisexuality fuses biological sex (male or female) to sexual attraction. By this definition, “bisexual people were seen as psychologically intersex” (Eisner, 2013, p. 15). Kite and Deaux (1987), as cited by Shields and Dicicco (2011), found that stereotypes of lesbians and gay men largely reflected the inversion model – lesbians were “masculine,” gay men were “feminine” (493). After the 1981 emergence of HIV/AIDS, bisexuality was defined as both a sexual orientation and practice (MacDowall, 2009). Yoshino (2000) wrote that “HIV is often characterized as [the] ‘gay’ [male] disease” (p. 427), yet many women were also contracting the virus: In the minds of many heterosexual Americans, bisexuality has come to be strongly identified with images of married, dishonest, closeted men sneaking out on their unsuspecting wives, con- tracting AIDS through unsafe sex with other men, then infecting their innocent wives and chil- dren (Gelman, 1989, as cited by Yoshino, 2000). Yoshino also discusses the large number of magazine articles, such as Gelman’s, warning heterosexuals about the HIV/AIDs risk that bisexuals posed to the community (2000). Previous Studies Yost and Thomas (2013) surveyed a total of 253 undergraduate students and found that the participants holistically rejected stereotypical attitudes towards bisexual persons. However, male participants were more likely to agree with the negative statements than female students. 104 http://commons.emich.edu/mcnair/vol7/iss1/10 4 London-Terry: Examining Undergraduate Attitudes Towards Bisexuality and Bisexual Individuals Examining Undergraduate Attitudes Towards Bisexuality and Bisexual Individuals Friedman, Dodge, Schick, Herbenick, Hucbach, Bowling, Goncalves, Krier, and Reece (2014) surveyed 300 undergraduate students and found that bisexual persons, regardless of their gender, faced discrimination from
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The George Wright Forum
    The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 34 number 3 • 2017 Society News, Notes & Mail • 243 Announcing the Richard West Sellars Fund for the Forum Jennifer Palmer • 245 Letter from Woodstock Values We Hold Dear Rolf Diamant • 247 Civic Engagement, Shared Authority, and Intellectual Courage Rebecca Conard and John H. Sprinkle, Jr., guest editors Dedication•252 Planned Obsolescence: Maintenance of the National Park Service’s History Infrastructure John H. Sprinkle, Jr. • 254 Shining Light on Civil War Battlefield Preservation and Interpretation: From the “Dark Ages” to the Present at Stones River National Battlefield Angela Sirna • 261 Farming in the Sweet Spot: Integrating Interpretation, Preservation, and Food Production at National Parks Cathy Stanton • 275 The Changing Cape: Using History to Engage Coastal Residents in Community Conversations about Climate Change David Glassberg • 285 Interpreting the Contributions of Chinese Immigrants in Yosemite National Park’s History Yenyen F. Chan • 299 Nānā I Ke Kumu (Look to the Source) M. Melia Lane-Kamahele • 308 A Perilous View Shelton Johnson • 315 (continued) Civic Engagement, Shared Authority, and Intellectual Courage (cont’d) Some Challenges of Preserving and Exhibiting the African American Experience: Reflections on Working with the National Park Service and the Carter G. Woodson Home National Historic Site Pero Gaglo Dagbovie • 323 Exploring American Places with the Discovery Journal: A Guide to Co-Creating Meaningful Interpretation Katie Crawford-Lackey and Barbara Little • 335 Indigenous Cultural Landscapes: A 21st-Century Landscape-scale Conservation and Stewardship Framework Deanna Beacham, Suzanne Copping, John Reynolds, and Carolyn Black • 343 A Framework for Understanding Off-trail Trampling Impacts in Mountain Environments Ross Martin and David R.
    [Show full text]
  • Bisexual People’S Experiences of and Ideas for Improving Services
    COMPLICATED? Bisexual people’s experiences of and ideas for improving services Sam Rankin James Morton and Matthew Bell 1 Acknowledgements The Equality Network would like to thank all the respondents to the survey for taking the time to contribute their experiences and ideas to better bisexual inclusion. We would also like to thank the authors of ‘The Bisexuality Report’1 for inspiring this work. Thanks also to our research assistant, Mel Maguire and all the people who provided feedback on the consultation draft and proof read the final draft. Thank you to the Scottish Government Equality Unit for funding this work. 1. Barker and others, 2012 3 Foreword Meg John Barker Back in 2012 when we produced The Bisexuality Report, my co-authors and I struggled with a few things. There was the lack of evidence regarding the experience of bisexual people in the UK – particularly those outside of the official ‘bisexual community’ – to support the findings from other countries. There was the absence of in-depth qualitative data from UK-based bisexual people to illustrate our points, particularly regarding experiences of services - which is so necessary if we are to fight for improvement in those areas. And there was the dearth of material anywhere regarding people whose bisexuality intersected with other marginalised identities and experiences. This in particular was something we subsequently hugely regretted giving such a small amount of space to, given its vital importance and the danger of suggesting shared experience where actually there is so much diversity. For these reasons – and so many more – I am extremely grateful to the Equality Network for producing ‘Complicated?’.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II
    Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II Volume 25 Article 1 2020 Full Issue Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/historical-perspectives Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation (2020) "Full Issue," Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II: Vol. 25 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/historical-perspectives/vol25/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. et al.: Full Issue Historical Perspectives Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History December 2020 Series II, Volume XXV ΦΑΘ Published by Scholar Commons, 2020 1 Historical Perspectives: Santa Clara University Undergraduate Journal of History, Series II, Vol. 25 [2020], Art. 1 Cover image: A birds world Nr.5 by Helmut Grill https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/historical-perspectives/vol25/iss1/1 2 et al.: Full Issue The Historical Perspectives Peer Review Process Historical Perspectives is a peer-reviewed publication of the History Department at Santa Clara University. It showcases student work that is selected for innovative research, theoretical sophistication, and elegant writing. Consequently, the caliber of submissions must be high to qualify for publication. Each year, two student editors and two faculty advisors evaluate the submissions. Assessment is conducted in several stages. An initial reading of submissions by the four editors and advisors establishes a short-list of top papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Bisexual Erasure Brochure
    WHAT IS BISEXUALITY? The term bisexual derives from the prefix "bi" to mean two. Historically, this term referred to those who are attracted to two genders, sometimes their own gender and another one. However, there are many bi FIND MORE folks who use this term to BISEXUAL encompass their attraction for RESOURCES AT: many or all genders. It is CCGSD-CCDGS.ORG/CAMPAIGNS ERASURE important to note that along with many other identities, this label is fluid and may mean different things to different people. @ccgsd_ccdgs WHAT IS BISEXUAL WHAT NOT TO SAY TO ERASURE? A BISEXUAL PERSON: Bisexual erasure is the dismissal Subtle Erasure Overt Erasure of a bi person’s experiences with "Who do you see yourself ending up "I wouldn't be able to trust a bisexual their identity because of certain with?" This is one way of implying that person enough to date them." normative expectations around someone has to “end up” gay or straight This statement implies that a bisexual sexuality. Erasure can occur and ignores bisexuality as a valid person is more promiscuous than a identity. It also invalidates the monosexual person, prone to cheating, explicitly our implicitly in our experiences of non-monogamous folks. day-to-day dialogue, or or that there are more people to cheat "Well, really everyone is kind of with, making them untrustworthy, and systemically in our communities. bisexual." Though this is meant to a bad partner. Bisexual erasure is a acknowledge the fluidity of sexuality, it manifestation of biphobia, dismisses the reality of people who "It's just a phase/you're just confused!" identify as bisexual and erases their whereby a bisexual person is This is a common statement for bi experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Queer Politics, Bisexual Erasure: Sexuality at the Nexus of Race, Gender, and Statistics
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Queer Politics, Bisexual Erasure: Sexuality at the Nexus of Race, Gender, and Statistics Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8hv987pn Author Rodriguez, JM Publication Date 2021-06-27 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California JUANA MARÍA RODRÍGUEZ Queer Politics, Bisexual Erasure Sexuality at the Nexus of Race, Gender, and Statistics COMING OF AGE as a bisexual Latina femme in the 1980s, I was sur- rounded by lesbian-feminist communities and discourses that dispar- aged, dismissed, and vilified bisexuality. Those of us that enthusiastically embraced femininity or that actively sought out masculine presenting butches, were deemed perpetually suspect. Femmes were imagined as being always on the verge of abandoning the lesbian-feminist commu- nities that nurtured us for the respectability and privilege that hetero- sexual relations might afford. The label bisexuality, for those that dared to claim it, was viewed as the apolitical cop-out for those that were not radical enough to fully commit to the implied lesbian practice of feminist theory. In the bad old days of lesbian separatist politics, bisexu- ality was attached to a yearning, not just for men, but for multifarious sexual pleasures deemed decidedly anti-feminist including desires for penetration, sexual dominance and submission, and the wickedly per- verse delights of expressive gender roles. Decades later, discursive prac- tices have shifted. The B is now routinely added to the label LGBT and the umbrella of queer provides discursive cover for sexual practices that fall outside the normative frameworks of heteropatriarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • Information and Guidance on How to Support Bisexual People We’Re Mind, the Mental Health Charity
    Stand BI me Information and guidance on how to support bisexual people We’re Mind, the mental health charity. We believe no one should have to face a mental health problem alone. We’re here for you. Today. Now. We’re on your doorstep, on the end of a phone or online. Whether you’re stressed, depressed or in crisis. We’ll listen, give you support and advice, and fight your corner. And we’ll push for a better deal and respect for everyone experiencing a mental health problem. mind.org.uk/equality Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................. 4 2. What is bisexuality? ............................................................... 5 3. Bisexuality and mental health ................................................ 8 4. Bisexuality and intersectionality ............................................ 10 5. Guidance for you: How to support bisexual people* ........... 14 6. Case studies .......................................................................... 18 7. Glossary ................................................................................ 21 8. References ........................................................................... 22 * You’ll find guidance pages have a yellow tab along the side Stand BI me – information and guidance on how to support bisexual people 3 1. Introduction Over the last few decades, social awareness Bisexual people exist in mental health services, and acceptance of lesbian, gay, bisexual and and the workplace, just like anywhere else – and transgender,
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Bisexual Erasure for Asexual Erasure
    Lessons from bisexual erasure for asexual erasure Abstract: In the absence of research into the specific motives for asexual erasure, the motives for bisexual erasure as theorised by Kenji Yoshino are appropriated for that purpose. The motives to 1) preserve the stability of sexual orientations 2) preserve sex as an important distinguishing trait and 3) preserve norms of monogamy, identified as underpinning bisexual erasure, are each applied to asexuality. The conclusions reached suggest that motives 2) and 3) to erase bisexuality could theoretically be strengthened in the case of asexual erasure, and motive 1), while not logically applicable to asexuality, nonetheless suggests an additional potential reason why asexuality is erased. Keywords: Asexuality, Bisexuality, Erasure, Kenji Yoshino, LGBT+ discrimination. Lessons from bisexual erasure for asexual erasure Erasure is often cited as being the primary challenge facing the asexual community in its efforts to establish a position for itself next to the other “mainstream” sexual orientations. Asexual awareness movements, to borrow from Andrew Sullivan (1996) are “less a matter of complaint than of pride”. And the desire for pride is not easily dismissed as trivial. Yet neither is pride easy to cultivate. This is the challenge of asexual erasure and as challenges go it is a substantial one. However, as with all challenges in life, there is no better advice than to understand the challenge before confronting it. Understanding is what this essay sets out to achieve. Kenji Yoshino’s (2000) article The epistemic contract of bisexual erasure inspired me to do so and supplies the content of this essay. Until I came across Yoshino’s work one could have argued that I did not understand why erasure takes place insofar as I did not fully appreciate how it can function as a defence against the “threats” posed by an aberrant sexual community.
    [Show full text]
  • Masculinity As Prison: Sexual Identity, Race, and Incarceration Russell K
    Berkeley Law Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2011 Masculinity as Prison: Sexual Identity, Race, and Incarceration Russell K. Robinson Berkeley Law Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/facpubs Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Russell K. Robinson, Masculinity as Prison: Sexual Identity, Race, and Incarceration, 99 Cal. L. Rev. 1309 (2011) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Masculinity as Prison: Sexual Identity, Race, and Incarceration Russell K. Robinson* The Los Angeles County Men's Jail segregatesgay and transgender inmates and says that it does so to protect them from sexual assault. But not all gay and transgenderinmates qualify for admission to the K6G unit. Transgender inmates must appear transgender to staff that inspect them. Gay men must identify as gay in a public space and then satisfactorily answer a series of cultural questions designed to determine whether they really are gay. This policy creates harms for those who are excluded, including vulnerable heterosexual and bisexual men, men who have sex with men but do not embrace gay identity, and gay-identified men who do not mimic white, affluent gay culture. Further,the policy harms those who are included in that it stereotypes them as inherent victims, exposes them to a heightened risk of HIV transmission, and disrupts relationships that cut across gender identity and sexual orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Rights Campaign
    DePauw University Scholarly and Creative Work from DePauw University Student research Student Work 4-2019 The rP ogression of the LGBTQ+ Rights Movement in the United States: The umH an Rights Campaign Tabitha Adams DePauw University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.depauw.edu/studentresearch Part of the Gender and Sexuality Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Adams, Tabitha, "The rP ogression of the LGBTQ+ Rights Movement in the United States: The umH an Rights Campaign" (2019). Student research. 104. https://scholarship.depauw.edu/studentresearch/104 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Scholarly and Creative Work from DePauw University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student research by an authorized administrator of Scholarly and Creative Work from DePauw University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Progression of the LGBTQ+ Rights Movement in the United States: The Human Rights Campaign Tabitha Adams DePauw University Honor Scholar Program Class of 2019 Sponsor: Salil Benegal Committee Members: Bruce Stinebrickner and Jeannette Johnson-Licon 2 3 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………………….5 Preface on Terminology …………………………………………………………………………..7 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………….9 Chapter One: Historical Overview ………………………………………………………………14 Section 1. Historical Background Before and During the 1950s ………………………..14 Section 2. The Politicization of Gay Activism in the 1960s …………………………….22 Section 3. The 1969 Stonewall Inn Raid and Riots ……………………………………..29 Section 4. Late 1969 to Early 1970s: Gay Liberation Begins …………………………...32 Section 5. Early 1970s Consensus ………………………………………………………38 Section 6. Liberation Breeds Greater Politicization …………………………………….42 Section 7. Opposition Increases Against the Gay Community ………………………….49 Chapter Two: The Human Rights Campaign and More ……………………………………...…54 Section 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Biphobia, Bisexual Erasure and Their Impact on Mental Health
    The Invisi_les: Biphobia, Bisexual Erasure and Their Impact on Mental Health ANDREA PENNASILICO [email protected] University of Naples Federico II ANNA LISA AMODEO1 [email protected] University of Naples Federico II Abstract In the last few years, research on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) health increased, but little scientific literature has been focused on bisexual health. This critical review aims at understanding the relationship between discrimination towards bisexual people and their mental and physical health. The first part of the article reviews different forms of bisexual discrimination, such as biphobia, bisexual invisibility, and bi-erasure, showing how biphobia is different from homophobia, especially considering how heavily it is perpetrated inside and outside the community. The second part of the paper focuses on gathering data about bisexual people’s health, showing the differences with the gay and lesbian community, as well as the diverse effects that discrimination can have on physical and mental outcomes. Finally, the last part focuses on the healthcare experiences of bisexual people and what can be done to improve their health. 1. Introduction Bisexuality generally refers to the attraction towards more than one gender. Notwithstanding the scientific increased interest in bisexual health in the last decades, bisexual people still are acknowledged to be an ‘invisible’ and ‘excluded’ population within several domains, such as media, gay and lesbian communities, and healthcare research. Recently, the attention on bisexuality is starting to increase and more literature on the matter is being published, along with a slow but steady increase of positive representation in the media. Therefore, a paper that collects all useful resources available on bisexuality and mental health can be especially needed in setting the groundwork for future research.
    [Show full text]
  • Biphobia, Bi Erasure, & Getting Help
    Why are mental health issues REFERENCES important to bisexuals*? San Francisco Human Rights Commission. (2011). “Bisexual Invisibility: Impacts and Research suggests that bisexuals suffer Recommendations.” worse mental health outcomes than http://sf-hrc.org/reports-research-investigations heterosexuals, lesbians, and gay men. These outcomes include: The Open University. (2012). “The Bisexuality Report: Bisexual Inclusion Mental Health • Higher rates of anxiety, depression, in LGBT Equality and Diversity.” and other mood disorders. http://www.open.ac.uk/ in the Bisexual • Higher reporting of self-harm, suicidal thoughts, and suicide attempts. NATIONAL RESOURCES Community: • Lower levels of social support. Bisexuality-Aware Professionals Directory • Being less likely to be comfortable with http://www.bizone.org/bap/ Biphobia, their sexuality or be “out” to friends and BiNet USA family compared to lesbians and gay men. 800-585-9368 www.binetusa.org Bi Erasure, • Higher rates of substance use, including The GLBT National Help Center Hotline cigarette smoking and heavy drinking. 1-888-843-4564 & Getting Help The Trevor Project Lifeline (for youth ages 13-24) 1-866-488-7386 What causes these poor mental health outcomes in bisexuals? While the exact reasons may differ from person-to-person, research suggests that there are two common elements involved: • Biphobia, and • Bi erasure or invisibility Bisexual Resource Center More research is needed to better under- P.O. Box 170796 stand the scope and depth of mental health Boston, MA 02117 issues
    [Show full text]
  • Lgbtqtheme-Bisexual.Pdf
    Published online 2016 www.nps.gov/subjects/tellingallamericansstories/lgbtqthemestudy.htm LGBTQ America: A Theme Study of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer History is a publication of the National Park Foundation and the National Park Service. We are very grateful for the generous support of the Gill Foundation, which has made this publication possible. The views and conclusions contained in the essays are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. © 2016 National Park Foundation Washington, DC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted or reproduced without permission from the publishers. Links (URLs) to websites referenced in this document were accurate at the time of publication. INCLUSIVE STORIES Although scholars of LGBTQ history have generally been inclusive of women, the working classes, and gender-nonconforming people, the narrative that is found in mainstream media and that many people think of when they think of LGBTQ history is overwhelmingly white, middle-class, male, and has been focused on urban communities. While these are important histories, they do not present a full picture of LGBTQ history. To include other communities, we asked the authors to look beyond the more well-known stories. Inclusion within each chapter, however, isn’t enough to describe the geographic, economic, legal, and other cultural factors that shaped these diverse histories. Therefore, we commissioned chapters providing broad historical contexts for two spirit, transgender, Latino/a, African American Pacific Islander, and bisexual communities.
    [Show full text]