DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Enfield Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Enfield Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Study Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Development Study London Borough of Enfield March 2010 Prepared by: ............................................ Approved by: ............................................ Matthew Turner Rob Shaw Senior Consultant Associate Director Allie O’Donovan Senior Consultant Rev No Comments Date 1 Outline Draft issued to client 25/09/09 2 Updated outline Draft issued to client 08/10/09 3 Draft report issued to client 21/12/09 4 Final Draft issued to client 26/01/10 5 Final Draft reissued with amendments and updated maps 05/03/10 6 Final Report Issued 23/03/10 The Johnson Building, 77 Hatton Garden, London, EC1N 8JS Telephone: 020 7645 2000 Fax: 020 7645 2099 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No: 60102479 Reference: Enfield PPS1 Study Date Created: 23/03/10 This contains confidential and commercially sensitive information, which shall not be disclosed to third parties. f:\sdg\jobs\sdg - enfield renewable and low carbon study\06 reports\310310-mjt-enfield renewable energy and low carbon development study final.docx Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 3 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 21 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................. 21 1.2 The Need for a Renewable and Low Carbon Energy Study .............................. 21 2 Policy Review ................................................................................................................ 24 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 24 2.2 National ............................................................................................................... 24 2.3 Regional .............................................................................................................. 30 2.4 Local ................................................................................................................... 35 2.5 Other emerging and changing regulation, targets and standards ...................... 36 2.6 Review of other Local Authority low carbon and renewable energy targets....... 39 2.7 Lessons Learned: Ensuring the development of a robust evidence base .......... 43 3 Existing CO2 Emissions Data and Baseline Information .......................................... 48 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 48 3.2 Existing Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions Data for Enfield .................. 48 3.3 Housing Data ...................................................................................................... 50 3.4 Calculating the Energy Demands from the Housing Stock................................. 51 3.5 Carbon Dioxide Emissions .................................................................................. 59 3.6 Existing buildings ................................................................................................ 61 4 Future Development Plans ........................................................................................... 65 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 65 4.2 Future Housing Projections ................................................................................ 66 4.3 Strategic Growth Areas ....................................................................................... 69 5 Energy Opportunities and Constraints ....................................................................... 78 5.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 78 5.2 Energy Efficiency ................................................................................................ 78 5.3 District/Community Heat and Power Networks ................................................... 81 5.4 Biomass .............................................................................................................. 89 5.5 Energy from Waste ............................................................................................. 98 5.6 Micro generation technologies .......................................................................... 103 5.7 Stand alone Wind Turbines .............................................................................. 109 5.8 Other constraints ............................................................................................... 114 5.9 Energy Opportunities Plan ................................................................................ 117 5.10 Key Findings and Recommendations ............................................................... 128 6 Code for Sustainable Homes and BREEAM ............................................................. 130 6.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 130 6.2 Code for Sustainable Homes ............................................................................ 131 6.3 BREEAM ........................................................................................................... 134 6.4 Requirements other than energy ...................................................................... 135 6.5 Cost Implications ............................................................................................... 136 6.6 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................ 139 7 Policy Testing .............................................................................................................. 141 7.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 141 7.2 Policies Tested .................................................................................................. 141 7.3 Findings for Improvements to Existing Buildings .............................................. 141 7.4 Improvements to New Buildings ....................................................................... 143 7.5 Key Findings and Recommendations ............................................................... 154 7.6 Site-Wide Impacts ............................................................................................. 157 8 Proposed Policies ....................................................................................................... 168 8.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 168 8.2 Proposed Policy 1: Support for decentralised low and zero carbon technologies in line with the Energy Opportunity Plan ..................................... 168 8.3 Proposed Policy 2: Reduction in emissions from new development ................ 170 8.4 Proposed Policy 3: District Heating Priority Areas ............................................ 172 8.5 Proposed Policy 4: Consequential Improvements to Existing Residential Properties .......................................................................................................... 173 8.6 Proposed Policy 5: Wind Power ....................................................................... 174 8.7 Proposed Policy 5: Environmental Design Standards ...................................... 175 9 Implementation Plan ................................................................................................... 178 9.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 178 9.2 Existing Development ....................................................................................... 179 9.3 New Development ............................................................................................. 180 9.4 Strategic Community-Wide Interventions ......................................................... 184 9.5 Delivery Partners .............................................................................................. 190 9.6 Monitoring and Review ..................................................................................... 192 9.7 Recommendations and Next Steps .................................................................. 192 10 Monitoring & Enforcement ......................................................................................... 198 10.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 198 10.2 Demonstrating and Checking Compliance ....................................................... 198 10.3 Monitoring ......................................................................................................... 199 Glossary ................................................................................................................................... 202 Appendix A ............................................................................................................................... 206 Appendix B ............................................................................................................................... 218 Appendix C ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Flood Risk Assessment
    London Regional Flood Risk Appraisal First Review August 2014 Contents Page Updating the January 2014 Consultation Draft 3 Executive Summary 4 Chapter 1 - Introduction 1.1 Wider Policy Background 5 1.2 The London Plan 6 1.3 The Sequential Test 8 1.4 How to use this RFRA 9 Chapter 2 - Overview of Flood Risk to London 2.1 Tidal Flood Risk 10 2.2 Fluvial Flood Risk 15 2.3 Surface Water Flood Risk 23 2.4 Foul Sewer Flood Risk 27 2.5 Groundwater Flood Risk 28 2.6 Reservoir Flood Risk 29 Chapter 3 – Spatial Implications of Flood Risk 3.1 Introduction 32 3.2 Specific Development Areas 33 3.3 Main Rail Network and Stations 47 3.4 London Underground & DLR Network 48 3.5 Main Road Network and Airports 49 3.6 Emergency Services 51 3.7 Schools 52 3.8 Utilities 53 3.9 Other Sites 55 Chapter 4 – Conclusions and Look Ahead 56 Appendix 1 List of Monitoring Recommendations 57 Appendix 2 Glossary 59 Appendix 3 Utility Infrastructure within Flood Risk Zones 60 Appendix 4 Comparison of Flood Risk Data with 2009 RFRA 66 Appendix 5 Flood Risk Maps Separate Document London Regional Flood Risk Appraisal – First Review – August 2014 page 2 of 66 Updating the January 2014 Consultation Draft This document represents an update of the draft, that was published in January 2014, in the light of a three-month consultation. Alongside further assistance by the Environment Agency, this final version of the First Review was also informed by responses the Mayor received from TfL as well as the London Boroughs of Richmond, Havering and Southwark (see Statement of Consultation provided separately).
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralized Energy Master Planning
    Decentralized Energy Master Planning The London Borough of Brent An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science Submitted by Anthony Aldi Karen Anundson Andrew Bigelow Andrew Capulli Sponsoring Agency London Borough of Brent Planning Service Advisors Dominic Golding Ruth Smith Liaison Joyce Ip 29 April 2010 This report represents the work of four WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of completion of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. Abstract The London Borough of Brent aims to reduce its carbon emissions via implementation of decentralized energy schemes including combined heat and power systems. The objective of this project was to aid Brent in the early stages of its decentralized energy master planning. By examining policies of other boroughs and studying major development areas within Brent, the WPI project team has concluded that the council must actively facilitate the development of decentralized energy systems through the use of existing practices and development of well supported policies. i Authorship Page This report was developed through a collaborative effort by the project team: Anthony Aldi, Karen Anundson, Andrew Bigelow, and Andrew Capulli. All sections were developed as team with each member contributing equally. ii Acknowledgements The team would like to thank our advisors from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Professor Dominic Golding and Professor Ruth Smith. The team would also like to thank the liaison Joyce Ip from the London Borough of Brent Planning Service and the entire Planning Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System
    Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process This document has been issued by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, together with the Devolved Administrations for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. April 2012 UK’s National Implementation Measures submission – April 2012 Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process On 12 December 2011, the UK submitted to the European Commission the UK’s National Implementation Measures (NIMs), containing the preliminary levels of free allocation of allowances to installations under Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (2013-2020), in accordance with Article 11 of the revised ETS Directive (2009/29/EC). In response to queries raised by the European Commission during the first stage of their assessment of the UK’s NIMs, the UK has made a small number of modifications to its NIMs. This includes the introduction of preliminary levels of free allocation for four additional installations and amendments to the preliminary free allocation levels of seven installations that were included in the original NIMs submission. The operators of the installations affected have been informed directly of these changes. The allocations are not final at this stage as the Commission’s NIMs scrutiny process is ongoing. Only when all installation-level allocations for an EU Member State have been approved will that Member State’s NIMs and the preliminary levels of allocation be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • London Electricity Companies Had Already Supply Co
    printed LONDON AREA POWER SUPPLY A Survey of London’s Electric Lighting and Powerbe Stations By M.A.C. Horne to - not Copyright M.A.C. Horne © 2012 (V3.0) London’s Power Supplies LONDON AREA POWER SUPPLY Background to break up streets and to raise money for electric lighting schemes. Ignoring a small number of experimental schemes that did not Alternatively the Board of Trade could authorise private companies to provide supplies to which the public might subscribe, the first station implement schemes and benefit from wayleave rights. They could that made electricity publicly available was the plant at the Grosvenor either do this by means of 7-year licences, with the support of the Art Gallery in New Bond Street early in 1883. The initial plant was local authority, or by means of a provisional order which required no temporary, provided from a large wooden hut next door, though a local authority consent. In either case the local authority had the right supply was soon made available to local shopkeepers. Demand soon to purchase the company concerned after 21 years (or at 7-year precipitated the building of permanent plant that was complete by intervals thereafter) and to regulate maximum prices. There was no December 1884. The boiler house was on the south side of the power to supply beyond local authority areas or to interconnect intervening passage called Bloomfield Street and was connected with systems. It is importantprinted to note that the act did not prevent the generating plant in the Gallery’s basement by means of an creation of supply companies which could generate and distribute underground passage.
    [Show full text]
  • Neimme-Bcura-C
    NEIMME/BCURA/C - British Coal Utilisation Research Association - C series Date of publicati Code Title (245) Author 245c on (260c) Location D. Hicks, W. V. NEIMME/BCURA/C/2 Air pollution arising from the sulphur in coal Battcock 1963 LP13 Bay1 Box 17 NEIMME/BCURA/C/3 Agenda - BCURA Council 101st meeting - 4 March 1963 BCURA 1963 LP13 Bay1 Box 17 NEIMME/BCURA/C/4 Air pollution arising from the emission of oxides of sulphur D. Hicks 1963 LP13 Bay1 Box 17 NEIMME/BCURA/C/6 Minutes - BCURA Council 101st meeting - 4 March 1963 BCURA 1963 LP13 Bay1 Box 17 Supplementary submission to D.S.I.R. applying for grant-aid in the quinquennium 1964- NEIMME/BCURA/C/7 68 D. Hicks 1963 LP13 Bay1 Box 17 NEIMME/BCURA/C/8 Agenda - BCURA Council 102nd meeting - 24 June 1963 BCURA 1963 LP13 Bay1 Box 17 NEIMME/BCURA/C/9 Minutes - BCURA Council 102nd meeting - 24 June 1963 BCURA 1963 LP13 Bay1 Box 17 NEIMME/BCURA/C/11 Agenda - BCURA Council 103rd meeting - 21 October 1963 BCURA 1963 LP13 Bay1 Box 17 NEIMME/BCURA/C/12 The association's pension arrangements D. Hicks 1963 LP13 Bay1 Box 17 NEIMME/BCURA/C/13 Minutes - BCURA Council 103rd meeting - 21 October 1963 BCURA 1963 LP13 Bay1 Box 17 NEIMME/BCURA/C/14 Agenda - BCURA Council 104th meeting - 16 December 1963 BCURA 1963 LP13 Bay1 Box 17 NEIMME/BCURA/C/15 Minutes - BCURA Council 104th meeting - 16 December 1963 BCURA 1963 LP13 Bay1 Box 17 NEIMME/BCURA/C/16 Research summary of the annual report - 1963 BCURA 1964 LP13 Bay1 Box 17 NEIMME/BCURA/C/17 Agenda - BCURA Council 105th meeting - 2 March 1964 BCURA 1964 LP13 Bay1
    [Show full text]
  • No. 208, Winter 2017 What Is the Future for Enfield Town? on 25Th September 2017, the Consultation Period Ended for the Draft Enfield Town Master Plan
    Enfield Society News No. 208, Winter 2017 What is the future for Enfield Town? On 25th September 2017, the consultation period ended for the draft Enfield Town Master Plan. The plan was summarised in the Autumn newsletter and is an advisory document designed to provide a framework for future developments. The Society’s Architecture and Planning Group gave careful consideration to the plan, holding a joint meeting with the Enfield Town Conservation Area Study Three adjacent empty shop units in Enfield Church Street Group and meeting the planning officers involved in the masterplan preparation. The idea of a bridge linking the Tesco should review how market places operate The Plan states that Enfield Town Centre site with the Town Centre is strongly in other towns. now needs to respond to a series of supported because this could be an We noted that the plan does not make challenges and opportunities in order to attractive landscaped feature. reference to any significant consultation successfully define its future. In general terms the lack of any proposals with the Palace Gardens and Palace for community use – schools, childcare, Exchange shopping centres. The number These include: health facilities, sheltered housing etc. – of empty units along Church Street ● A series of site development opportunities, is noted and regretted. If more residential continues to cause serious concern. Some which need a coordinated response to development is encouraged, supporting of these units need considerable control the form, quality and density of community infrastructure is essential. modernisation and yet landlords continue new development. The Society has reviewed the various to charge very high rents.
    [Show full text]
  • TEI Times May 2019
    THE ENERGY INDUSTRY May 2019 • Volume 12 • No 3 • Published monthly • ISSN 1757-7365 www.teitimes.com TIMES Sleepless nights? Getting closer Final Word Energy storage and digitalisation are Europe’s Clean Energy Package We live in a rebellious two areas that are keeping energy should bring markets closer together climate, says Junior Isles. executives awake at night. but some of its provisions need further Page 16 Page 13 clarification. Page 14 News In Brief Wind to become “truly global market” in five years National Plans The Global Wind Energy Council forecasts that 300 GW of new wind capacity will be added globally by 2024. Page 2 will not deliver Opportunity Zones offer tax breaks A tax break offered to investors in so-called ‘Opportunity Zones’ may provide extra capital for renewable energy developers in the USA renewables as other support mechanisms are phased out. Page 4 Coal still part of balanced energy mix target The Philippines still sees coal as an important part of its future energy mix, as developers continue to outline plans for future coal fired WindEurope’s Giles Dickson says none of the power plants. plans properly spell out policy measures Page 6 Ofgem addresses supplier The EU has concluded negotiations on its Clean Energy Package but recent research shows that rules A series of company collapses in the National Plans might not deliver the previously agreed 32 per cent renewables target. Junior Isles UK’s energy retail sector has forced Europe’s draft National Energy and this. But none of the Plans properly simplifying rules on planning and per- Another issue the Plans need to ad- the regulator to revise the rules for Climate Plans are insufficient to de- spell out the policy measures by which mitting, such as common sense re- dress is how to get more renewables new entrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Table A.1 - List of Combustion Plants to Be Included in the Transitional National Plan a B C D E F G H I J K L M
    Table A.1 - List of combustion plants to be included in the transitional national plan A B C D E F G H I J K L M Annual Quantity of S in number of indigenous solid operating fuels used which Conversion factor(s) Total rated hours Pollutant(s) (SO2, NOx, Average was introduced used in case the thermal (ANOH); dust) for which the plant annual waste into the waste gas flow rate input on (average 2001- concerned is NOT covered gas flow rate combustion plan was calculated from 31/12/2010 2010 if less by the transitional national Gas turbine (average 2001- (avergae 2001- the fuel input (per fuel Number Operating Company Plant name Location (Postcode) 1st permit Extension (MWth) than 1500) plan or engine Annual amount of fuel used (average 2001-2010) (TJ/year) 2010) (Nm³/y) 2010) (tpa) type) (Nm³/GJ) other solid liquid hard coal lignite biomass fuels fuels gaseous fuels Kemsley CHP – GT & WHRB Natural Gas: 1 E.ON UK Plc A/B ME10 2TD 23-mars-95 nr 348 nr SO2; Dust Turbine 0 0 0 0 0 7482 6299837158 nr Natural Gas: 842; Kemsley CHP – Package boilers Natural Gas: 2 E.ON UK Plc D-F 2 ME10 2TD 23-mars-95 nr 74 nr nr nr 0 0 0 0 0 81 22724094 nr Natural Gas: 279 Natural Gas: 3 E.ON UK Plc Killingholme GT 22 DN40 3LU 14-nov-91 nr 445 nr SO2; Dust Turbine 0 0 0 0 0 4724 3977321358 nr Natural Gas: 842; Natural Gas: 4 E.ON UK Plc Killingholme GT 21 DN40 3LU 14-nov-91 nr 445 nr SO2; Dust Turbine 0 0 0 0 0 4914 4137193588 nr Natural Gas: 842; Natural Gas: 5 E.ON UK Plc Killingholme GT 12 DN40 3LU 14-nov-91 nr 445 nr SO2; Dust Turbine 0 0 0 0 0 5128 4317570970
    [Show full text]
  • Powering Ahead Delivering Low Carbon Energy for London
    October 20091 Powering ahead Delivering low carbon energy for London October 2009 Powering ahead: delivering low carbon energy for London This propectus has been prepared with the help and expertise of those listed in the working group below. Working group Argent - Robert Evans, Andre Gibbs Arup - John Miles Buro Happold - Rod Macdonald, Alasdair Young Climate Change Capital - Ingrid Holmes Department of Energy and Climate Change - Andy Cormie, Rita Wadey Greater London Authority - Syed Ahmed, Peter Daw Land Securities - Neil Pennell London Councils - Faraz Baber London Development Agency - Peter North, Robert Tudway London First - Judith Salomon Norton Rose - Nicholas Pincott PWC - Jon Williams, Richard Gledhill Transport for London - Padmesh Shukla Greater London Authority October 2009 ISBN 978 1 84781 302 2 Published by Greater London Authority, City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, More London, London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Contents 5 Foreword 7 1 The opportunity - London, the place for decentralised energy 11 2 Commercial models 15 3 Why is decentralised energy happening now, what is changing in the market? 25 4 Funding 29 5 Next steps 31 6 Pipeline of potential projects 33 References 43 6 Foreword 7 The Copenhagen Summit in December 2009 Combined with demand side measures, focuses the world’s attention once again on investment in decentralised energy is key to climate change. London government and underpin London’s ‘Low Carbon Capital’ status business continue to work together to address and to support its emergence as a global hub for the challenge. Energy and carbon reduction green industry, knowledge and finance.
    [Show full text]
  • I L't U , Loi . R. SS IM S Vol. CXXXVI. No. 3503 JANUARY 12, 1945 9D
    E i M hktc'aj. E e v ie w , j a k i ary I l’t u , lo i . r . S S I M s MANUFACTURERS’ ACTIVITIES Vol. CXXXVI. No. 3503 JA N U A R Y 12, 1945 9d. W E E K L Y Advt. oj The General Electric Co., Ltd. Head Office : Magnet House, Kingsway, London. W.C 2 E lectrical Review January 1 2 , 1945 E KM copper for the machinist E H ¡11 ffjg ffz/jitJe iJ machining copper smashes bottle-necks; it was designed to do the difficult easily; as against ordinary H.C. copper it will increase your machine output by at least .300% • it will reduce your tool costs • it gives you a cleaner and more accurate finish • its electrical conductivity is 98% I.A.C.S. • it withstands temperatures I00-I509C. higher than H.C. copper • may we send you our technical leaflet about this alloy? niield oiling ills Ltd Greenwood X.4 January 12, 1945 E l f c t iu c a l R f v ie w The positive—in all items of life (including Electrical prac­ tice) would be valueless with­ out the negative. Both must oppose each other. W ithout difficulties by “ negative^” forces, “ positive ” advance­ ment in design could never record increasing improve­ ment. For it is the overcoming of existing difficulties that measures the pace of progress. LEADERS IN ELECTRIC WATER HEATING HEATRAE LTD., NORWICH PHONE : NORWICH 25131 GRAMS : HEATRAE, NORWICH W E MAKE TAG TERMINALS ELECTRIC WELDING MACHINES S P O T, SEAM AND BUTT FOR WIRELESS WELDERS AND S I M I L A R A WIDE RANGE OF 35 ytart' .aperient« ' CONNECTIONS SIZES IN STOCK Automatic or Non- ROSS COU RTN EY & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Variation and Consolidation with Introductory Note the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2010
    Notice of variation and consolidation with introductory note The Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2010 Uniper UK Limited Enfield Power Station 111 Brancroft Way Brimsdown Enfield EN3 7PL Variation application number EPR/NP3833RC/V002 Permit number EPR/NP3833RC Enfield Power Station Variation and consolidation number EPR/NP3833RC/V001 1 Enfield Power Station Permit number EPR/NP3833RC Introductory note This introductory note does not form a part of the notice. Under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2010 (schedule 5, part 1, paragraph 19) a variation may comprise a consolidated permit reflecting the variations and a notice specifying the variations included in that consolidated permit. Schedule 1 of the notice specifies that all the conditions of the permit have been varied and schedule 2 comprises a consolidated permit which reflects the variations being made and contains all conditions relevant to this permit. The requirements of the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) 2010/75/EU are given force in England through the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 (the EPR) (as amended). This Permit, for the operation of large combustion plant (LCP), as defined by articles 28 and 29 of the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED), is varied by the Environment Agency to implement the special provisions for LCP given in the IED, by the 1 January 2016 (Article 82(3)). The IED makes special provisions for LCP under Chapter III, introducing new Emission Limit Values (ELVs) applicable to LCP, referred to in Article 30(2) and set out in Annex V. As well as implementing Chapter III of IED, the consolidated variation notice takes into account and brings together in a single document all previous variations that relate to the original permit issued.
    [Show full text]
  • E.ON 2005 Annual Report on Form 20-F Entitled “Item 3
    E.ON Group Financial Highlights Financial Calendar in millions 2005 20041 +/– % 2005 Annual Report Electricity sales (in billion kWh)2 404.3 392.4 +3 Gas sales (in billion kWh)2 924.4 868.2 +6 Sales 56,399 46,742 +21 Adjusted EBITDA3 10,272 9,741 +5 Adjusted EBIT4 7,333 6,787 +8 Income/Loss (–) from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interests 7,208 6,355 +13 May 4, 2006 2006 Annual Shareholders Meeting Income/Loss (–) from continuing operations 4,379 4,027 +9 May 5, 2006 Dividend Payout Income from discontinued operations, net 3,035 312 – Net income 7,407 4,339 +71 May 10, 2006 Interim Report January – March 2006 Investments 4,337 5,109 –15 Cash provided by operating activities 6,601 5,840 +13 August 15, 2006 Interim Report January – June 2006 Free cash flow5 3,611 3,228 +12 November 8, 2006 Interim Report January – September 2006 Net financial position6 (at year end) 3,863 –5,483 – Stockholders’ equity 44,484 33,560 +33 Total assets 126,562 114,062 +11 March 7, 2007 Release of 2006 Annual Report ROCE7 (in %) 12.1 11.5 +0.68 Cost of capital (in %) 9.0 9.0 – May 3, 2007 2007 Annual Shareholders Meeting Value added7 1,872 1,477 +27 Return on equity after taxes9 (in %) 19.0 13.7 +5.38 May 4, 2007 Dividend Payout Employees (at year end) 79,947 60,156 +33 May 9, 2007 Interim Report January – March 2007 Earnings per share from continuing operations (in ) 6.64 6.13 +8 Earnings per share from discontinued operations (in ) 4.61 0.48 – August 15, 2007 Interim Report January – June 2007 Earnings per share from cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, net (in ) –0.01 – – November 13, 2007 Interim Report January – September 2007 Earnings per share from net income (in ) 11.24 6.61 +70 Stockholders’ equity per share10 (in ) 67.50 50.93 +33 2005 Annual Report Dividend per share (in ) 2.75 2.35 +17 OneE.ON Special dividend per share (in ) 4.25 – – Dividend payout 4,61411 1,549 +198 Market capitalization12 ( in billions) 57.6 44.2 +30 1Adjusted for discontinued operations.
    [Show full text]