TEI Times May 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download Meeting Summary
Turitea wind farm Community Liaison Group 10 February 2021 MARGARET KOUVELIS welcomed everyone to the meeting, noting it was being held at a new time (5pm) and the intention to hold meeting to one hour. She noted that everyone should have signed in using the Golf Club’s QR poster downstairs, and handed over to Dennis Radich. Present from Mercury: Dennis Radich (Project Director), John Campbell (Project Manager), Duncan Annandale (Property Manager), Mark Henry (Environmental Resources Manager), Katy Scoullar (Communications Manager). From Vestas: Kenn Wood (Project Manager) HOW CAN WE IMPROVE THESE MEETINGS? We’ve been looking at what these meetings are for, and whether we achieve that • Length of meetings • What we use the time to talk about • Room hire and catering 2 MEETING FORMAT RE-SET DENNIS said that it is now a logical time to review this meeting format as in May it will be 2 years since our first meeting, and major construction work on the transmission line is largely complete. We wanted to know how we could improve the way we hold these meetings to make them more useful and valuable. Attendance from people in the community has dwindled. Take away the project and contrator teams and there’s actually a very small number who attend. We used our email mailing list to seek feedback on the meeting format, along with the other ways we share information with the community. Our conclusions are that these meetings are too long, we hire a room too big for what we need and because the meetings are so long we need sustenance. -
Decentralized Energy Master Planning
Decentralized Energy Master Planning The London Borough of Brent An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science Submitted by Anthony Aldi Karen Anundson Andrew Bigelow Andrew Capulli Sponsoring Agency London Borough of Brent Planning Service Advisors Dominic Golding Ruth Smith Liaison Joyce Ip 29 April 2010 This report represents the work of four WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of completion of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. Abstract The London Borough of Brent aims to reduce its carbon emissions via implementation of decentralized energy schemes including combined heat and power systems. The objective of this project was to aid Brent in the early stages of its decentralized energy master planning. By examining policies of other boroughs and studying major development areas within Brent, the WPI project team has concluded that the council must actively facilitate the development of decentralized energy systems through the use of existing practices and development of well supported policies. i Authorship Page This report was developed through a collaborative effort by the project team: Anthony Aldi, Karen Anundson, Andrew Bigelow, and Andrew Capulli. All sections were developed as team with each member contributing equally. ii Acknowledgements The team would like to thank our advisors from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Professor Dominic Golding and Professor Ruth Smith. The team would also like to thank the liaison Joyce Ip from the London Borough of Brent Planning Service and the entire Planning Service. -
Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System
Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process This document has been issued by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, together with the Devolved Administrations for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. April 2012 UK’s National Implementation Measures submission – April 2012 Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process On 12 December 2011, the UK submitted to the European Commission the UK’s National Implementation Measures (NIMs), containing the preliminary levels of free allocation of allowances to installations under Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (2013-2020), in accordance with Article 11 of the revised ETS Directive (2009/29/EC). In response to queries raised by the European Commission during the first stage of their assessment of the UK’s NIMs, the UK has made a small number of modifications to its NIMs. This includes the introduction of preliminary levels of free allocation for four additional installations and amendments to the preliminary free allocation levels of seven installations that were included in the original NIMs submission. The operators of the installations affected have been informed directly of these changes. The allocations are not final at this stage as the Commission’s NIMs scrutiny process is ongoing. Only when all installation-level allocations for an EU Member State have been approved will that Member State’s NIMs and the preliminary levels of allocation be accepted. -
London Electricity Companies Had Already Supply Co
printed LONDON AREA POWER SUPPLY A Survey of London’s Electric Lighting and Powerbe Stations By M.A.C. Horne to - not Copyright M.A.C. Horne © 2012 (V3.0) London’s Power Supplies LONDON AREA POWER SUPPLY Background to break up streets and to raise money for electric lighting schemes. Ignoring a small number of experimental schemes that did not Alternatively the Board of Trade could authorise private companies to provide supplies to which the public might subscribe, the first station implement schemes and benefit from wayleave rights. They could that made electricity publicly available was the plant at the Grosvenor either do this by means of 7-year licences, with the support of the Art Gallery in New Bond Street early in 1883. The initial plant was local authority, or by means of a provisional order which required no temporary, provided from a large wooden hut next door, though a local authority consent. In either case the local authority had the right supply was soon made available to local shopkeepers. Demand soon to purchase the company concerned after 21 years (or at 7-year precipitated the building of permanent plant that was complete by intervals thereafter) and to regulate maximum prices. There was no December 1884. The boiler house was on the south side of the power to supply beyond local authority areas or to interconnect intervening passage called Bloomfield Street and was connected with systems. It is importantprinted to note that the act did not prevent the generating plant in the Gallery’s basement by means of an creation of supply companies which could generate and distribute underground passage. -
Puketoi Wind Farm
1 PUKETOI WIND FARM RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATIONS AND ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 2 August 2011 2 VOLUME 1 PART A: RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATIONS 3 APPLICATION FOR RESOURCE CONSENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 88 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 FORM 9 To: Manawatu-Wanganui (Horizons) Regional Council Regional House 11-15 Victoria Street Private Bag 11 025 Manawatu Mail Centre PALMERSTON NORTH MIGHTY RIVER POWER LIMITED (‘Mighty River Power’) hereby applies for the following resource consents pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991 (‘RMA’): Resource Consents Sought 1. Mighty River Power proposes to construct, operate and maintain a Wind Farm containing up to 53 wind turbines and an associated transmission line (‘the Proposal’) as more fully discussed and described within the Assessment of Environmental Effects (‘AEE’), which follows as Part B of this document. 2. Mighty River Power applies for all necessary resource consents to construct, operate and maintain the Proposal as detailed in the AEE, including but not limited to: Land and Water Regional Plan a. Land Use Consents – for earthworks and vegetation removal associated with the construction of the Proposal, including access roads, turbine and transmission tower foundations and for ancillary buildings; b. Discharge Permits – for the discharge of stormwater to land, including stormwater from the substation, switchyard, concrete batching plants, workshop, staff ablutions building and fuel storage areas. Manawatu Catchment Water Quality Plan c. Discharge Permit – for discharge of stormwater from the substation, switchyards, concrete batching plants, workshop, staff ablutions building and fuel storage areas; Regional Plan for the Beds of Rivers and Lakes and Associated Activities d. -
Next Generation of Wind Turbines & Future of New Zealand's Wind Energy
Next generation of wind turbines & the future of New Zealand wind energy Peter Cowling Head of Vestas Australia and New Zealand New large-scale generation since 2014 3 Table of contents Wind turbine technology update 4-15 Future of New Zealand’ wind energy 16-20 2 Next generation of wind turbines and future of NZ wind energy Classification: Public Turitea: new large scale generation since 2014 Vestas to strengthen Mercury’s renewable portfolio by delivering its first wind asset, Turitea Wind Farm. The Wind Farm is the country’s first large-scale generation capacity addition since 2014, after 15 years in the development pipeline. Customer: Mercury Location: Turitea, near Palmerston North Wind turbine: 33 X V112-3.6 MW Hub height: 69 meters Total installed capacity: 119MW Service contract: 25-year AOM 5000 3 Next generation of wind turbines and future of NZ wind energy Classification: Public Wind turbine technology update Versatile solutions for any wind energy project Ongoing innovation from the undisputed global wind leader 2 MW Platform 4 MW Platform EnVentus™ Platform PRODUCT- V90-2.0 V100- V110- V116 V120 V105- V112- V117- V117- V126- V136- V136- V150- V150- V162- 4.2 MW™ CAPACITY MW® 2.0 MW® 2.0 MW® 2.1 MW™ 2.2 MW™ 3.45 MW™ 3.45 MW ® ** 3.45 MW ® 4.2 MW™ 3.45 MW ® 3.45 MW ® 4.2 MW™ 5.6 MW™ 5.6 MW™ YEAR OF PROTOTYPE 2004 2009 2014 2017 2018 2014 2013 2013 2018 2013 2016 2018 2018 2019 2020 Installed* Installed** 43 GW 23 GW * As of 31 December 2018, including V80-1.8/2.0 MW™ and V90-1.8 MW™ ** As of 31 December 2018, Including V112-3.0 -
No. 208, Winter 2017 What Is the Future for Enfield Town? on 25Th September 2017, the Consultation Period Ended for the Draft Enfield Town Master Plan
Enfield Society News No. 208, Winter 2017 What is the future for Enfield Town? On 25th September 2017, the consultation period ended for the draft Enfield Town Master Plan. The plan was summarised in the Autumn newsletter and is an advisory document designed to provide a framework for future developments. The Society’s Architecture and Planning Group gave careful consideration to the plan, holding a joint meeting with the Enfield Town Conservation Area Study Three adjacent empty shop units in Enfield Church Street Group and meeting the planning officers involved in the masterplan preparation. The idea of a bridge linking the Tesco should review how market places operate The Plan states that Enfield Town Centre site with the Town Centre is strongly in other towns. now needs to respond to a series of supported because this could be an We noted that the plan does not make challenges and opportunities in order to attractive landscaped feature. reference to any significant consultation successfully define its future. In general terms the lack of any proposals with the Palace Gardens and Palace for community use – schools, childcare, Exchange shopping centres. The number These include: health facilities, sheltered housing etc. – of empty units along Church Street ● A series of site development opportunities, is noted and regretted. If more residential continues to cause serious concern. Some which need a coordinated response to development is encouraged, supporting of these units need considerable control the form, quality and density of community infrastructure is essential. modernisation and yet landlords continue new development. The Society has reviewed the various to charge very high rents. -
Table A.1 - List of Combustion Plants to Be Included in the Transitional National Plan a B C D E F G H I J K L M
Table A.1 - List of combustion plants to be included in the transitional national plan A B C D E F G H I J K L M Annual Quantity of S in number of indigenous solid operating fuels used which Conversion factor(s) Total rated hours Pollutant(s) (SO2, NOx, Average was introduced used in case the thermal (ANOH); dust) for which the plant annual waste into the waste gas flow rate input on (average 2001- concerned is NOT covered gas flow rate combustion plan was calculated from 31/12/2010 2010 if less by the transitional national Gas turbine (average 2001- (avergae 2001- the fuel input (per fuel Number Operating Company Plant name Location (Postcode) 1st permit Extension (MWth) than 1500) plan or engine Annual amount of fuel used (average 2001-2010) (TJ/year) 2010) (Nm³/y) 2010) (tpa) type) (Nm³/GJ) other solid liquid hard coal lignite biomass fuels fuels gaseous fuels Kemsley CHP – GT & WHRB Natural Gas: 1 E.ON UK Plc A/B ME10 2TD 23-mars-95 nr 348 nr SO2; Dust Turbine 0 0 0 0 0 7482 6299837158 nr Natural Gas: 842; Kemsley CHP – Package boilers Natural Gas: 2 E.ON UK Plc D-F 2 ME10 2TD 23-mars-95 nr 74 nr nr nr 0 0 0 0 0 81 22724094 nr Natural Gas: 279 Natural Gas: 3 E.ON UK Plc Killingholme GT 22 DN40 3LU 14-nov-91 nr 445 nr SO2; Dust Turbine 0 0 0 0 0 4724 3977321358 nr Natural Gas: 842; Natural Gas: 4 E.ON UK Plc Killingholme GT 21 DN40 3LU 14-nov-91 nr 445 nr SO2; Dust Turbine 0 0 0 0 0 4914 4137193588 nr Natural Gas: 842; Natural Gas: 5 E.ON UK Plc Killingholme GT 12 DN40 3LU 14-nov-91 nr 445 nr SO2; Dust Turbine 0 0 0 0 0 5128 4317570970 -
Energy Freedom for a Changing World
ENERGY FREEDOM FOR A CHANGING WORLD. 2020 ANNUAL REPORT // MERCURY NZ LIMITED MENU. ABOUT THIS MENU 1. ENERGY FREEDOM TODAY. 2. OUR WORLD OF ENERGY FREEDOM. REPORT. 04 WHO WE ARE 14 THE WORLD AROUND US 05 OUR DIRECTION 18 ENGAGING WITH OUR STAKEHOLDERS Mercury is committed to providing transparent disclosures in 06 OUR BUSINESS MODEL 20 THE RISKS WE FACE easily understood, comparable and engaging ways so that we meet the expectations of our many stakeholders. 09 CHAIR & CHIEF EXECUTIVE 21 PULLING IT ALL TOGETHER UPDATE 22 CREATING VALUE IN FY20 This report follows the Integrated Reporting <IR> framework. We describe Our Business Model, including inputs, outputs and the outcomes of our strategic approach across five pillars, taking a long-term view of value creation. We also include a specific Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards index and our climate change section follows the Task Force on Climate- ABOUT THIS REPORT 3. LIVING ENERGY FREEDOM. related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). OUR PILLAR STORIES We have grouped our reporting into five sections to help you find areas of particular interest, but note that they are all part of who we are, what we do and why. Across all this, we seek to report openly and honestly on our performance in a way that shows the integrated approach CUSTOMER PARTNERSHIPS KAITIAKITANGA PEOPLE COMMERCIAL we take. If you have any comments about this report, including things 24 27 30 36 39 we could do better, please email [email protected] STATEMENT FROM THE DIRECTORS PREPARING FOR CLIMATE CHANGE The directors are pleased to present Mercury NZ Limited’s 33 integrated Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2020. -
Vestas to Strengthen Mercury's Renewable Portfolio by Delivering Its
Page 1 of 2 News release from Asia Pacific Singapore, 29 March 2019 Vestas to strengthen Mercury’s renewable portfolio by delivering its first wind asset New Zealand-based electricity generator and retailer Mercury has signed an engineering, procurement and construction contract with Vestas for the 119 MW Turitea Wind Farm. The project will be Mercury’s first wind asset globally, adding a new source of renewable generation to its current hydro and geothermal renewable portfolio. The Turitea Wind Farm is situated at Turitea, near Palmerston North, and enjoys world-class wind resources. Its 33 Vestas V112-3.45 MW turbines will be delivered in 3.6 MW Power Optimised Mode and have a hub height of 69 metres, designed specifically for the site, which will maximise annual energy production and deliver one of the world’s highest generation outputs per turbine. “New Zealand has outstanding wind resources, and we look forward to capturing some of this potential in the Turitea wind farm project”, said Mercury Chief Executive Fraser Whineray. “Mercury is 100 percent committed to renewable energy, and we share a vision of energy freedom with our customers, their communities and our country. We are proud to add another renewable resource to our portfolio through a contract that leverages Vestas’ global experience and wind turbine technology”. “We are proud that Mercury has selected Vestas as its supplier for its first wind project, and we look forward to continuing this relationship as Mercury expands its portfolio,” said Peter Cowling, Head of Vestas Australia and New Zealand. “With our rich wind asset management experience, strong Palmerston North presence and the latest in turbine technology, we will capture the full potential of these wind resources, driving down the cost of energy and delivering commercial value for our customer”. -
Powering Ahead Delivering Low Carbon Energy for London
October 20091 Powering ahead Delivering low carbon energy for London October 2009 Powering ahead: delivering low carbon energy for London This propectus has been prepared with the help and expertise of those listed in the working group below. Working group Argent - Robert Evans, Andre Gibbs Arup - John Miles Buro Happold - Rod Macdonald, Alasdair Young Climate Change Capital - Ingrid Holmes Department of Energy and Climate Change - Andy Cormie, Rita Wadey Greater London Authority - Syed Ahmed, Peter Daw Land Securities - Neil Pennell London Councils - Faraz Baber London Development Agency - Peter North, Robert Tudway London First - Judith Salomon Norton Rose - Nicholas Pincott PWC - Jon Williams, Richard Gledhill Transport for London - Padmesh Shukla Greater London Authority October 2009 ISBN 978 1 84781 302 2 Published by Greater London Authority, City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, More London, London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Contents 5 Foreword 7 1 The opportunity - London, the place for decentralised energy 11 2 Commercial models 15 3 Why is decentralised energy happening now, what is changing in the market? 25 4 Funding 29 5 Next steps 31 6 Pipeline of potential projects 33 References 43 6 Foreword 7 The Copenhagen Summit in December 2009 Combined with demand side measures, focuses the world’s attention once again on investment in decentralised energy is key to climate change. London government and underpin London’s ‘Low Carbon Capital’ status business continue to work together to address and to support its emergence as a global hub for the challenge. Energy and carbon reduction green industry, knowledge and finance. -
Mighty River Power Ltd Env-2010-Wlg-000147
4461 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT In the matter of appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Resource Management Act 1991 concerning proposed One Plan for the Manawatu-Wanganui region. between MERIDIAN ENERGY LTD ENV-2010-WLG-000149 and MIGHTY RIVER POWER LTD ENV-2010-WLG-000147 and TRUSTPOWER LTD ENV 2010-WLG-000145 and GENESIS POWER LTD ENV-2010-WLG-000159 Appellants and MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent ____________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF PLANNING EVIDENCE BY CLARE BARTON ON THE TOPIC OF OUTSTANDING NATURAL FEATURES AND LANDSCAPES, INCLUDING SCHEDULE F, ON BEHALF OF MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Dated: 31st January 2012 Solicitor: John W Maassen/Nicholas Jessen Administrator: Sharon Belk Address: 11-15 Victoria Avenue Private Bag 11025 Palmerston North 4442 Telephone: (06) 952 2800 Facsimile: (06) 952 2929 Email: [email protected] 4462 4463 STATEMENT OF PLANNING EVIDENCE BY CLARE BARTON ON THE TOPIC OF OUTSTANDING NATURAL FEATURES AND LANDSCAPES, INCLUDING SCHEDULE F, ON BEHALF OF MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Terms TEB = technical evidence bundle NV = notified version of POP DV = decisions version of POP MV = mediated version of POP MCB = mediation compilation bundle NPS REG = National Policy Statement on Renewable Energy Generation NZCPS = New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement RMA = Resource Management Act 1991 Introduction Qualifications and experience 1. My name is Julie Clare Barton and I am a Senior Consents Planner at Manawatu Wanganui (Horizons) Regional Council. I have been employed by Horizons in this capacity since May 2010. I hold a Bachelor of Regional Planning degree (Honours) from Massey University, Palmerston North. 2. I have 22 years experience in New Zealand in the profession of planning.