DOCSLIB.ORG

THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OFFICE of HUB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OFFICE of HUB THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OFFICE of HUB & PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL COMPREHENSIIVE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW for UNIVERSITIES RFP NUMBER RFP01 CHAN-13-005 PROPOSAL MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE: 2:00 P.M. Central Time on April 26, 2013 MAIL, HAND DELIVER, AND /OR EXPRESS MAIL PROPOSAL TO: The Texas A&M University System The Texas A&M University System Building System Office of HUB & Procurement Programs 301 Tarrow 3rd Floor College Station, TX 77840 Attn: Don Barwick Show RFP Number, Opening Date and Time on Response Envelope NOTE: PROPOSAL must be time stamped at The Texas A&M University System Office of HUB Programs before the hour and date specified for receipt of proposal. Pursuant to the Provisions of Texas Government Code Title 10, Chapter 2156.121-2156.127, sealed proposals will be received until the date and time established for receipt. After receipt, only the names of Respondents will be made public. Prices and other proposal details will only be divulged after the award, if one is made. REFER INQUIRIES TO: Don Barwick, Manager The Texas A&M University System HUB & Procurement Programs 979-458-6410 email: [email protected] All proposals shall become the property of the State of Texas upon receipt. Proposals may be subject to public review after contracts have been awarded. VENDORS responding to this proposal are cautioned not to include any proprietary information as part of their proposal unless such proprietary information is carefully identified as such in writing, and the SYSTEM accepts, in writing, the information as proprietary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the SYSTEM is subject to the Texas Public Information Act. Table of Contents SECTION 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Scope 3 1.2 Background 3 1.3 Priorities/Explanations 4 1.4 Additional Resource Materials and Information 4 1.5 Performance Period 5 SECTION 2 Instruction for Respondents 6 2.1 Calender of Events 7 2.2 Examination of RFP 7 2.3 Submittal Instructions & Delivery of Submittals 7 2.4 Proposal Components 8 2.5 Inquiries and Interpretations 8 2.6 Selection Process 8 2.7 TAMUS HUB Policy & HUB Subcontracting Requirements 9 SECTION 3 Scope of Work 11 3.1 Introduction 11 3.2 Requirements 11 3.3 Contract Deliverables 12 3.4 Financial Proposal Requirements 13 3.5 Statement of Qualifications 13 3.6 Financial Requirements 13 3.7 Schedule Requirements 14 3.8 Company References 14 SECTION 4 General Terms and Conditions 15 Exhibit A Execution of Offer 21 Exhibit B Non-Collusion Affidavit 23 Exhibit C Pricing/Project Completion Matrix 24 Attachments I. Texas A&M University Organizational Chart II. Texas A&M Health Science Center Organizational Chart III. Prairie View A&M University Organizational Chart IV. Texas A&M University-Commerce Organizational Chart V. Tarleton State University Organizational Chart VI. West Texas A&M University Organizational Chart VII. Texas A&M University-Kingsville Organizational Chart VIII. Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Organizational Chart IX. Texas A&M International University Organizational Chart X. Texas A&M University-Texarkana Organizational Chart XI. Texas A&M University-San Antonio Organizational Chart XII. Texas A&M University-Central Texas Organizational Chart XIII. Texas A&M University at Galveston Organizational Chart 2 SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION 1.1 SCOPE The Texas A&M University System (TAMUS or A&M System) is seeking services of a firm(s) to conduct a comprehensive review and analysis of administrative structures, services, processes, practices and costs at Texas A&M University and Texas A&M Health Science Center. A second phase of this review will be focused on System universities located outside Brazos County to include Prairie View A&M University, Texas A&M University-Commerce, Tarleton State University, West Texas A&M University, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christ, Texas A&M International University, Texas A&M University-Texarkana, Texas A&M University- San Antonio, Texas A&M University-Central Texas, and Texas A&M University at Galveston. One purpose of this review is to identify recommendations that would enhance administrative efficiency, effectiveness, and execution at all levels of the organization. In particular, the review should identify functions and services that may be unnecessarily duplicated within and among A&M System members, as well as any organizational layers that create inefficiencies and complicate decision making and positive organizational change. Another purpose of the review is to identify administrative cost savings that can be redirected into the System’s core functions of teaching, research and service. While the fiscal climate for higher education in the State of Texas at the advent of the 2013 legislative session is not as bleak as comparable times in 2009 and 2011, it remains critically important for the A&M System to operate as cost-effectively as possible, and to maximize the resources provided by the State of Texas, constituents, and other stakeholders. To illustrate that point, please consider a hypothetical example of a university department that the study determines has $100,000 in excess administrative costs on an annual basis. The goal of this study is to identify an appropriate and effective mechanism to have the agency redirect that $100,000 of potential savings to faculty or researchers. Those savings would now better further the university’s mission. The issue of administrative inefficiency is not unique to the A&M System. The A&M System is confident that Texas A&M University and our other member universities are more efficient than other peer institutions. The A&M System, however, cannot be satisfied with that standard and must work to further enhance the efficiency of A&M System operations. Through this process, the A&M System seeks to develop an organizational structure and processes that will consistently enhance our ability to further our teaching, research and service mission in the face of the today’s economic realities. By submitting responses, each RESPONDENT certifies that it understands this RFP and has full knowledge of the scope, nature, quality, and quantity of the work to be performed, the detailed requirements of the services to be provided, and the conditions under which the services are to be performed. Each RESPONDENT also certifies that it understands that all costs relating to preparing and responding to this RFP will be the sole responsibility of the RESPONDENT. 1.2 Background TAMUS is one of the largest systems of higher education in the nation, with a statewide network of 3 eleven universities, seven state agencies and a comprehensive health science center. TAMUS members educate more than 123,000 students and reach another 22 million people through service each year. With more than 28,000 faculty and staff, TAMUS has a physical presence in 250 of the state’s 254 counties and a programmatic presence in every one. In 2011, externally funded research expenditures exceeded $780 million to help drive the state’s economy. Each of the 11 member universities and Health Science Center of TAMUS has its own mission, history and goals. The oldest institution and founding member of TAMUS is Texas A&M University, established in 1876. Many of the member universities and agencies joined TAMUS decades after being established. Together, they strive to provide educational programs, outreach and community enhancement services as well as research that will improve the lives of people in Texas and beyond. More than one in five students in a public university in Texas is enrolled in a TAMUS institution. TAMUS consistently ranks in the forefront among public universities in Texas in retention rates—keeping students enrolled and on course for graduation both overall and for African-American and Hispanic students. TAMUS students received about $247 million in scholarships and grants annually. TAMUS awarded 24,377 degrees in FY 2010. TAMUS’ faculty includes recipients of the Nobel Prize, National Medal of Science, Pulitzer Prize, World Food Prize and Wolf Prize, as well as members in the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering. 1.3 Priorities/Expectations RESPONDENTS should note the following priorities/expectations with regard to the possibility of TAMUS establishing a contractual relationship with any RESPONDENT: (a) Ensuring a Quality Level of Service. This priority encompasses the quality of the level of service that can be provided to TAMUS in a timely, cost effective manner. TAMUS is seeking a RESPONDENT that will ensure the provision of such quality in its delivery of service through proven techniques and established metrics. (b) Level of Experience and Expertise. RESPONDENT must demonstrate its capabilities in providing the utmost level of experience and expertise to ensure a successful project as determined by TAMUS. (c) Delivery Efficiency as it Relates to Total Costs. RESPONDENT must demonstrate its ability to deliver the required services in a cost-effective and timely manner while not sacrificing the quality required by a Tier I research system. (d) Financial Stability. RESPONDENT must demonstrate its financial stability and capabilities in providing the required services. At a minimum, the RESPONDENT shall provide the two most current audited financial statements. 1.4 Additional Resource Materials and Information 4 The following attachments and or websites are included as additional resource materials and historical data relating to the services requested by the RFP: Attachments I. Texas A&M University Organizational Chart II. Texas A&M Health Science Center Organizational Chart III. Prairie View A&M University Organizational Chart IV. Texas A&M University-Commerce Organizational Chart V. Tarleton State University Organizational Chart VI. West Texas A&M University Organizational Chart VII. Texas A&M University-Kingsville Organizational Chart VIII. Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Organizational Chart IX. Texas A&M International University Organizational Chart X.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vita I. Academic/Professional
    VITA I. ACADEMIC/PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND A. Name Title Mark Bayless Busby, Professor of English B. Educational Background (Years, Degrees, Universities, Majors, Thesis/Dissertation) August 1977 Ph.D. University of Colorado, Boulder Dissertation: “The Merging Adam-Christ Figure in Contemporary American Fiction” Director: James K. Folsom January 1969 M.A. Texas A&M University-Commerce Thesis: “Recent Trends in Marxist Literary Theory” Director: Thomas A. Perry May 1967 B.A. Texas A&M University-Commerce Majors: English and Speech C. University Experience (Dates, Positions, Universities,) Sept. 1994-Present Professor of English, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX August 1991-Sept. 1994 Associate Professor of English, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX August 2002-2012 Director, Southwest Regional Humanities Center, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX August 1991-2012 Director, Center for the Study of the Southwest, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX August 1983-July 1991 Associate Professor of English, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX August 1977-Aug. 1983 Assistant Professor of English, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX August 1972-May 1977 Instructor of English, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO June-August 1974, 1975 Instructor of English, Black Education Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO September 1970-June 1972 Associate Faculty Instructor of English, Indiana-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN D. Relevant Professional Experience (Dates, Position, Entity,) September 1970-Dec. 1971 Communicative Arts Instructor, U.S. Army Adjutant General School, Fort Harrison, IN September 1967-May 1969 Teaching Assistant in English, Texas A&M University-Commerce, TX II. TEACHING A. Teaching Honors and Awards: 2012 Named Alpha Chi Favorite Professor, Texas State University 2008- Named Jerome H.
    [Show full text]
  • Listening Patterns – 2 About the Study Creating the Format Groups
    SSRRGG PPuubblliicc RRaaddiioo PPrrooffiillee TThhee PPuubblliicc RRaaddiioo FFoorrmmaatt SSttuuddyy LLiisstteenniinngg PPaatttteerrnnss AA SSiixx--YYeeaarr AAnnaallyyssiiss ooff PPeerrffoorrmmaannccee aanndd CChhaannggee BByy SSttaattiioonn FFoorrmmaatt By Thomas J. Thomas and Theresa R. Clifford December 2005 STATION RESOURCE GROUP 6935 Laurel Avenue Takoma Park, MD 20912 301.270.2617 www.srg.org TThhee PPuubblliicc RRaaddiioo FFoorrmmaatt SSttuuddyy:: LLiisstteenniinngg PPaatttteerrnnss Each week the 393 public radio organizations supported by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting reach some 27 million listeners. Most analyses of public radio listening examine the performance of individual stations within this large mix, the contributions of specific national programs, or aggregate numbers for the system as a whole. This report takes a different approach. Through an extensive, multi-year study of 228 stations that generate about 80% of public radio’s audience, we review patterns of listening to groups of stations categorized by the formats that they present. We find that stations that pursue different format strategies – news, classical, jazz, AAA, and the principal combinations of these – have experienced significantly different patterns of audience growth in recent years and important differences in key audience behaviors such as loyalty and time spent listening. This quantitative study complements qualitative research that the Station Resource Group, in partnership with Public Radio Program Directors, and others have pursued on the values and benefits listeners perceive in different formats and format combinations. Key findings of The Public Radio Format Study include: • In a time of relentless news cycles and a near abandonment of news by many commercial stations, public radio’s news and information stations have seen a 55% increase in their average audience from Spring 1999 to Fall 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Npr Annual Report About | 02
    2010 NPR ANNUAL REPORT ABOUT | 02 NPR NEWS | 03 NPR PROGRAMS | 06 TABLE OF CONTENTS NPR MUSIC | 08 NPR DIGITAL MEDIA | 10 NPR AUDIENCE | 12 NPR FINANCIALS | 14 NPR CORPORATE TEAM | 16 NPR BOARD OF DIRECTORS | 17 NPR TRUSTEES | 18 NPR AWARDS | 19 NPR MEMBER STATIONS | 20 NPR CORPORATE SPONSORS | 25 ENDNOTES | 28 In a year of audience highs, new programming partnerships with NPR Member Stations, and extraordinary journalism, NPR held firm to the journalistic standards and excellence that have been hallmarks of the organization since our founding. It was a year of re-doubled focus on our primary goal: to be an essential news source and public service to the millions of individuals who make public radio part of their daily lives. We’ve learned from our challenges and remained firm in our commitment to fact-based journalism and cultural offerings that enrich our nation. We thank all those who make NPR possible. 2010 NPR ANNUAL REPORT | 02 NPR NEWS While covering the latest developments in each day’s news both at home and abroad, NPR News remained dedicated to delving deeply into the most crucial stories of the year. © NPR 2010 by John Poole The Grand Trunk Road is one of South Asia’s oldest and longest major roads. For centuries, it has linked the eastern and western regions of the Indian subcontinent, running from Bengal, across north India, into Peshawar, Pakistan. Horses, donkeys, and pedestrians compete with huge trucks, cars, motorcycles, rickshaws, and bicycles along the highway, a commercial route that is dotted with areas of activity right off the road: truck stops, farmer’s stands, bus stops, and all kinds of commercial activity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Improvement of Instructions
    QUEER UTOPIAN PERFORMANCE AT TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY A Thesis by DANA NICOLE SAYRE Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2012 Major Subject: Performance Studies Queer Utopian Performance at Texas A&M University Copyright 2012 Dana Nicole Sayre QUEER UTOPIAN PERFORMANCE AT TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY A Thesis by DANA NICOLE SAYRE Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Judith Hamera Committee Members, Kirsten Pullen Joseph O. Jewell Head of Department, Judith Hamera May 2012 Major Subject: Performance Studies iii ABSTRACT Queer Utopian Performance at Texas A&M University. (May 2012) Dana Nicole Sayre, B.A.; B.A, Fairmont State University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Judith Hamera Through a combination of personal interviews and participant-observation in three field sites – the Tim Miller workshop and performance of October 2010 and the student organizations Cepheid Variable and the GLBT Aggies – I argue that manifestations of utopian desire and performance circulate within and among marginalized groups on the Texas A&M University campus, undermining the heteronormative and monolithic utopia the university attempts to present. I participated in each night of rehearsal during the Tim Miller workshop, as well as the creation and performance of my own solo autobiographical monologue as a part of the ensemble. My participant-observation in Cepheid Variable and the GLBT Aggies was concurrent, consisting of attendance at both weekly organizational meetings and outside events sponsored by the organizations over two years.
    [Show full text]
  • TEXAS ASSOCIATED PRESS BROADCASTERS 2018 Winners
    TEXAS ASSOCIATED PRESS BROADCASTERS 2018 Winners and Judges’ Comments TELEVISION I, II, RADIO I, II COMBINED: Jordan Flaherty Award First Place KDFW-TV, Dallas TAPB-Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas Award First Place KXAN-TV, Austin TELEVISION I and II COMBINED: Overall Excellence-TV First Place KHOU-TV, Houston RADIO I and II COMBINED: Overall Excellence-Radio First Place WTAW-AM, College Station TELEVISION I: Commentary-Editorial First Place An effective entry, with other voices lending perspective. The KVUE-TV, Austin sharing of social media posts was particularly effective. Stacy Slayden "Quiet No More" Second Place KENS-TV, San Antonio Concise, direct, fair commentary. Evan Closky 1 TEXAS ASSOCIATED PRESS BROADCASTERS 2018 Winners and Judges’ Comments Feature (Light) First Place Well done! Informative and entertaining - with great KENS-TV, San Antonio storytelling. Deborah Knapp and Michael Humphries "Last of the Lanes: The 9-Pin Bowling Clubs of Texas" Second Place KENS-TV, San Antonio So interesting! The characters made the day here. Deborah Knapp and Michael Humphries "Something Fishy in the Basement" Investigative Report First Place WFAA-TV, Dallas-Fort Worth Tanya Eiserer and Mark Smith "Atmos Gas Explosion" Second Place KXAN-TV, Austin "Denied" Photojournalism-Station First Place KHOU should be very proud of its photographers. The stories KHOU-TV, Houston are filled with beautiful video, great lighting, interesting camera angles and very nice use of nats. Great job! Second Place KENS-TV, San Antonio Good reporter standup section and military video. Great "Mejor Bella Que Perfecta" photography and great use of nats. 2 TEXAS ASSOCIATED PRESS BROADCASTERS 2018 Winners and Judges’ Comments Photojournalism-Individual First Place Beautiful photography, great lighting, very nice use of nats, KHOU-TV, Houston music and creative camera angles.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas A&M University
    TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY Commencement May 12, 2017, 9 a.m. • • TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY COMMENCEMENT Graduate and Baccalaureate Program College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Friday, May 12, 2017, 9 a.m. Reed Arena Processional The National Anthem Student Expression of Appreciation Greetings and Authorization to Confer Degrees Presentation of Degree Candidates and Conferring of Degrees Presentation of Diplomas Induction into The Association of Former Students “The Spirit of Aggieland” Recessional • 1 • • • Faculty Marshals Mace Bearer Dr. John R. August, Dean of Faculties and Associate Provost Stage Party Ms. Venesa A. Heidick, Registrar Mr. Scott McDonald, Assistant Vice President for Academic Services and Director of Admissions Announcers Ms. Nora Cargo, Director, Scholarships & Financial Aid Mr. Mark Edwards, Traffic Director, KAMU-FM Mr. Mike Fitch, Transcript Analyst, Office of Admissions Judge Rick Hill, Brazos County Justice of the Peace Precinct 3 Gonfaloniers College of Agriculture and Life Sciences ......Mr. Joshua Robert Sutton College of Architecture ...................Ms. Madelyn Grace Walker Mays Business School ................Mr. Christopher Joseph Naeger College of Education and Human Development .....................Mr. Atik Shakeel Lalani College of Geosciences ...................Mr. Ben Watson Gremillion Bush School of Government and Public Service ........................ Mr. Said Mohammad Azam College of Liberal Arts ..................Ms. Katherine Barbara Wood College of Liberal Arts .....................Ms. Nicole Nadine Schultz College of Nursing ...........................Mr. Gilbert Costello III School of Public Health ...................Mr. Michael Anh Tuan Luu College of Science ........................Ms. Meghan Ashley Shanks College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences .................Ms. Molly Marie Wierzbowski The Texas A&M University System Board of Regents Mr. Cliff Thomas, Chairman ...............................Victoria Ms. Elaine Mendoza, Vice Chairman ....................San Antonio Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessible Common Alerting Protocol Radio Data System Demonstration: Gulf Coast States Final Report August 2014 1 TABLE of CONTENTS
    Accessible Common Alerting Protocol Radio Data System Demonstration: Gulf Coast States Final Report August 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6 4 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 5 METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 6 TECHNICAL CONFIGURATIONS AND TESTING ..................................................................................................................... 10 6.1 Hardware, Ingest Software (INSO) and Software to Monitor INSO (WATCHINSO) ...................................................... 10 Hardware ................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Is Our for the Brazos Valley?
    LIFESTYLE: How to Make New Year’s Resolutions That Stick January 2007 $1.95 HOWHOW GREENGREEN ISIS OUROUR GROWTHGROWTH FORFOR THETHE BRAZOSBRAZOS VALLEY?VALLEY? )S-OTHER.ATURE TOUGHONYOURJOINTS SPINE TOO THATSALLWEDO THISTIMEOFYEAR 7INTERWEATHERTAKESITSTOLLONEVERYTHING!NDTHEREARETIMESWHENYOU LITERALLYFEELITINYOURBONES3UBTLESYMPTOMSSUCHASMORNINGSTIFFNESS SWELLINGANDLIMITEDJOINTMOTIONCANPROGRESSINTOARTHRITICDISEASESTHAT AFFECTSMILLIONSOF!MERICANS 4HEONLYFELLOWSHIP TRAINEDSPINE $ONTLETTHECOLDWEATHERSTOPYOUFROMBEINGONTHEMOVE3CHEDULEA SURGERYSPECIALISTINTHE"RAZOS6ALLEY Brazo pine DIAGNOSTICEXAMWITH$R'RANT4AYLOR AT3COTT7HITE#OLLEGE3TATION 'RANT4AYLOR -$ BEFORETHEONSETOFWINTERnANDTHEJOINTPAINITBRINGS 2HEUMATOLOGIST 7EACCEPT"LUE#ROSSAND"LUE3HIELDOF4EXAS 3COTT7HITE(EALTH0LANS (UMANA -UKUND)'UNDANNA -$ 5NIVERSITY$RIVE%AST 3UITE &IRST(EALTH 3T*OSEPH%MPLOYEE(EALTH0LAN "RYAN 4EXAS ANDMANYOTHERINSURANCEPLANS 4ROY-$ULEY 0! # 4EL 5NIVERSITYs &AX "RYAN#OLLEGE3TATION"RENHAM2OCKDALE-EXIA WWWBRAZOSSPINECOM #ELEBRATING9EARSOF%XCELLENCEIN4HE"RAZOS6ALLEY publisher’sdesk THANKS for joining Insite Magazine in a new year. Like birthdays that end 6 with a zero, Januarys beg a certain contents level of introspection. With that in mind, what better question to ponder areaevents | page 6 than what the future of growth in the What’s Happening Brazos Valley will look like and what Brazos Valley African American Museum banquet impact it will have on each of us? and OPAS Gala highlight January events Growth affects everyone: employment 11 compiled by the Insite
    [Show full text]
  • Pride Parade Times Houstonglbtprideparade No.24 Saturday,June29,2002,8:45P.M
    Pride Parade Times HoustonGLBTPrideParade No.24 Saturday,June29,2002,8:45p.m. A World of Pride at Houston's Annual Nighttime Pride Parade WELCOMEto the 2002 Houston Gay, to the parade rules you have been WEATHER REPORT Lesbian, Bisexual & Transgender given. Pride Parade! Units must line up on time- It's Houston-it will rain sometime during the day! Bring protection for your We hope you have a thrilling 6 p.m. for floats, 7 p.m. for entry, particularly for your electronic time celebrating our community vehicles, and 7:30 p.m. for walking equipment. pride. 2002 marks Houston's 24th units. All units must be in place by In the case of extreme weather, the parade may be cancelled no later than annual Pride Parade and our sixth 8 p.m. and the parade will begin 7p.m. annualnighttime parade-America's at 8:45 p.m. original nighttime pride parade. Place your unit number in Awards will be presented on the Please refer to the map below a prominent position for easy main stage at 6 p.m. for the parade route and to the viewing by judges. This year, Units not checking in on time large map inside for your spot trophies will be presented at the or misrepresenting themselves on in the entry line-up. Make sure Pride Recovery Party, which will their parade applications may be you are familiar with and adhere be held 4-10 p.m., Sunday, June denied entry in the parade. 30, at Rich's, 2401 San Jacinto. 2002 PARADE ROUTE The official 2002 Parade .: .
    [Show full text]
  • List of Radio Stations in Texas
    Texas portal List of radio stations in Texas From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The following is a list of FCC-licensed AM and FM radio stations in the U.S. state of Texas, which can be sorted by their call signs, broadcast frequencies, cities of license, licensees, or programming formats. Call City of [3] Frequency [1][2] Licensee Format sign License KACU 89.7 FM Abilene Abilene Christian University Public Radio KAGT 90.5 FM Abilene Educational Media Foundation Contemporary Christian KAQD 91.3 FM Abilene American Family Association Southern Gospel KEAN- Townsquare Media Abilene 105.1 FM Abilene Country FM License, LLC Townsquare Media Abilene KEYJ-FM 107.9 FM Abilene Modern Rock License, LLC KGNZ 88.1 FM Abilene Christian Broadcasting Co., Inc. News, Christian KKHR 106.3 FM Abilene Canfin Enterprises, Inc. Tejano Townsquare Media Abilene KMWX 92.5 FM Abilene Adult Contemporary License, LLC Townsquare Media Abilene KSLI 1280 AM Abilene License, LLC Townsquare Media Abilene KULL 100.7 FM Abilene Classic Hits License, LLC Call City of [3] Frequency [1][2] Licensee Format sign License KVVO-LP 94.1 FM Abilene New Life Temple KWKC 1340 AM Abilene Canfin Enterprises, Inc. News/Talk Townsquare Media Abilene KYYW 1470 AM Abilene News/Talk License, LLC KZQQ 1560 AM Abilene Canfin Enterprises, Inc. Sports Talk KDLP-LP 104.7 FM Ace Ace Radio Inc. BPM RGV License Company, KJAV 104.9 FM Alamo Adult Hits L.P. KDRY 1100 AM Alamo Heights KDRY Radio, Inc. Christian Teaching & Preaching KQOS 91.7 FM Albany La Promesa Foundation KIFR 88.3 FM Alice Family Stations, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the Delegation of Authority to State Entities to Contract for External Audit Servcies
    A Report on The Delegation of Authority to State Entities to Contract for External Audit Services March 3, 2020 Members of the Legislative Audit Committee: To provide you with more information regarding the amount of Delegation of Authority for Audit audit work being performed related to state government, the State Services Auditor’s Office has compiled the following data on delegations of Texas Government Code, Section 321.020, authority to contract for audit services. The State Auditor’s Office is specifies that a state agency or a corporation that is dedicated to the responsible for reviewing and approving state entities’ delegation of benefit of a state agency may enter into a authority requests in accordance with Texas Government Code, contract for audit services only if (1) the agency or corporation is authorized to Section 321.020 (see text box). From September 1, 2018, through contract with a private auditor through a delegation of authority from the State August 31, 2019, the State Auditor’s Office received and approved Auditor, (2) the scope of the proposed 127 delegation of authority requests from 67 state entities. audit has been submitted to the State Auditor for review and comment, and (3) the services of the private auditor are Some delegations of authority covered more than one project. The procured through a competitive selection 127 delegation of authority requests included 154 projects with an process in a manner allowed by law. Additionally, Article IX, Section 6.20, of estimated total cost of approximately $60.3 million, as reported by the General Appropriations Act (86th the state entities in their delegation of authority requests.
    [Show full text]
  • Lone Star Conference
    LONE STAR CONFERENCE FOOTBALL www2.Lone0StarC1onfere8nce.org | @LoneStarConf | #LSCfb LONE STAR CONFERENCE ong known as a leader in intercollegiate athletics, the Lone Star Conference™ (LSC) is an innovative athletics conference that aims to provide a superior competitive experience for member institutions and to allow for comprehensive development of student-athletes L through academic services and life skills programming. The LSC continues to build upon its proud history while intending to be recognized as the premier NCAA Division II conference in the nation. The league’s mission is to foster student participation and success among member institutions in NCAA Division II intercollegiate athletics as an integral part of each institution’s total educational program. The LSC shall pursue student-athlete development with highest regard to the principles of academic excellence, graduation success, sportsmanship, ethical conduct, resourcefulness, community service, gender equity, and diversity. The LSC - founded on April 25, 1931 - has developed from a five-team conference of Texas-based schools to an 11-member league that spans three states (Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico). The league continues to assist its member institutions in the maintenance of intercollegiate athletic programs that are compatible with the highest standards of education and competitive sports. Throughout the league’s 87-year history, various institutions have competed under the LSC banner. Today, only Texas A&M University-Commerce (then East Texas State) remains from the original group that was formed in 1931 when North Texas State, Southwest Texas State, Sam Houston State and Stephen F. Austin withdrew from the old Texas Intercollegiate Athletic Association. The membership alignment has changed over the years, with current members added from 1954 to 2016.
    [Show full text]