DOCSLIB.ORG

S5(R3) Detection of Toxicity to Reproduction for Human Pharmaceuticals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
S5(R3) Detection of Toxicity to Reproduction for Human Pharmaceuticals S5(R3) DETECTION OF TOXICITY TO REPRODUCTION FOR HUMAN PHARMACEUTICALS This draft guidance, when finalized, will represent the current thinking of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) on this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. To discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for this guidance as listed on the title page. For questions regarding this draft document, contact (CDER) Abigail Jacobs 301-796-0174. 1 2 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL 3 REQUIREMENTS FOR PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE 4 5 6 DRAFT ICH HARMONISED GUIDELINE 7 8 DETECTION OF TOXICITY TO REPRODUCTION FOR HUMAN 9 PHARMACEUTICALS 10 S5(R3) 11 12 13 Current Step 1 draft version 14 dated 5 July 2017 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 At Step 2 of the ICH Process, a consensus draft text or guideline, agreed by the 30 appropriate ICH Expert Working Group, is transmitted by the ICH Assembly to the regulatory 31 authorities of the ICH regions for internal and external consultation, according to national 32 or regional procedures. 33 TABLE OF CONTENTS 34 1 SCOPE OF THE GUIDELINE ......................................................................................4 35 2 INTRODUCTION & GENERAL PRINCIPLES .........................................................4 36 3 STRATEGIES FOR REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY ASSESSMENT ......................3 37 3.1 CONSIDERATIONS/PRINCIPLES ....................................................................3 38 3.1.1 TARGET PATIENT POPULATION/ THERAPEUTIC INDICATION 39 CONSIDERATIONS .....................................................................................4 40 3.1.2 PHARMACOLOGY CONSIDERATIONS ..................................................4 41 3.1.3 TOXICITY CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................4 42 3.1.4 TIMING CONSIDERATIONS .....................................................................4 43 3.1.5 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY 44 STUDIES .......................................................................................................5 45 3.2 STRATEGY TO ADDRESS FERTILITY AND EARLY EMBRYONIC 46 DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................5 47 3.3 STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS EMBRYO FETAL DEVELOPMENT (EFD) 6 48 3.3.1 ROUTINE APPROACH FOR ADDRESSING EFD RISK ..........................6 49 3.3.2 OPTIONAL APPROACHES FOR ADDRESSING EFD RISK ...................8 50 3.3.2.1 Use of Alternative Assays ....................................................................8 51 3.3.2.2 In vitro and Non-mammalian Exposure Information .........................10 52 3.3.3 POTENTIAL APPROACHES TO DEFER IN VIVO TESTING AS PART 53 OF AN INTEGRATED TESTING STRATEGY ........................................10 54 3.4 STRATEGY TO ADDRESS EFFECTS ON PPND .........................................11 55 3.5 TOXICOKINETICS (TK) ..................................................................................11 56 4 TEST SYSTEM SELECTION .....................................................................................11 57 4.1 ROUTINE TEST SPECIES ................................................................................11 58 4.1.1 RAT AS THE PRIMARY SPECIES FOR REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY 59 TESTING .....................................................................................................12 60 4.1.2 RABBIT AS THE SECONDARY SPECIES FOR EFD STUDIES ...........12 61 4.1.3 SPECIES SELECTION FOR PREVENTATIVE AND THERAPEUTIC 62 VACCINES..................................................................................................12 63 4.2 NON-ROUTINE TEST SPECIES ......................................................................13 64 4.3 OTHER TEST SYSTEMS ..................................................................................14 65 4.3.1 USE OF DISEASE MODELS .....................................................................14 66 4.3.2 USE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED MODELS AND USE OF 67 SURROGATE MOLECULES.....................................................................14 68 5 DOSE LEVEL SELECTION, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION AND 69 SCHEDULE....................................................................................................................15 70 5.1 DOSE SELECTION COMMON TO ALL PHARMACEUTICALS, 71 INCLUDING BIOTECHNOLOGY-DERIVED PHARMACEUTICALS .....16 2 72 5.1.1 TOXICITY–BASED ENDPOINTS ............................................................16 73 5.1.2 ABSORPTION, DISTRIBUTION, METABOLISM AND EXCRETION 74 (ADME)-BASED SATURATION OF SYSTEMIC EXPOSURE 75 ENDPOINT..................................................................................................16 76 5.1.3 EXPOSURE-BASED ENDPOINT .............................................................17 77 5.1.3.1 Considerations for Total vs. Fraction Unbound Pharmaceutical 78 Exposure ............................................................................................17 79 5.1.3.2 Exposure-based Approach for Highly Targeted Therapeutics ...........18 80 5.1.4 MAXIMUM FEASIBLE DOSE (MFD) ENDPOINT ................................18 81 5.1.5 LIMIT DOSE ENDPOINT ..........................................................................19 82 5.1.6 SELECTION OF LOWER DOSE LEVELS ...............................................19 83 5.2 DOSE SELECTION AND STUDY DESIGNS FOR VACCINES ..................19 84 6 DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF IN VIVO MAMMALIAN STUDIES .................20 85 6.1 THREE SEPARATE STUDIES TO ASSESS ALL STAGES (A F) .............20 86 6.2 SINGLE STUDY DESIGN..................................................................................20 87 6.3 TWO STUDY DESIGN .......................................................................................21 88 6.4 COMBINATION DESIGN OF REPEAT-DOSE AND FERTILITY 89 STUDIES ..............................................................................................................21 90 6.5 EVALUATION OF DATA..................................................................................22 91 6.5.1 DATA HANDLING/DATA PRESENTATION/STATISTICS FOR IN 92 VIVO STUDIES ..........................................................................................22 93 6.5.2 STATISTICS ...............................................................................................23 94 7 PRINCIPLES OF RISK ASSESSMENT.....................................................................23 95 7.1 RISK ASSESSMENT FOR REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL 96 TOXICITIES ........................................................................................................24 97 7.2 RISK ASSESSMENT FOR LACTATION ........................................................25 98 8 ENDNOTES....................................................................................................................26 99 9 GLOSSARY....................................................................................................................27 100 10 REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................30 101 11 ANNEX ...........................................................................................................................30 102 11.1 TABLE OF SPECIES ADVANTAGES/DISADVANTAGES .........................30 103 11.2 IN VIVO STUDY DESIGNS ...............................................................................34 104 11.2.1 FERTILITY AND EARLY EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT (FEED) 105 STUDY ........................................................................................................35 106 11.2.2 PRE- AND POSTNATAL DEVELOPMENTAL (PPND) TOXICITY 107 STUDY ........................................................................................................37 108 11.2.2.1 Optional Modification of Rodent PPND Study to Assess Juvenile 109 Toxicity Endpoints .............................................................................38 110 11.2.2.2 Enhanced Pre- and Postnatal Developmental toxicity study (ePPND) 111 in NHP ...............................................................................................38 3 112 11.2.3 EMBRYO-FETAL DEVELOPMENTAL (EFD) TOXICITY STUDY .....39 113 11.2.3.1 Dose Range Finding (DRF) Study .....................................................39 114 11.2.3.2 pEFD Study ........................................................................................40 115 11.2.3.3 Definitive Embryo-fetal Developmental Toxicity Study ...................40 116 11.2.4 COMBINATION STUDIES ........................................................................41 117 11.2.4.1 Fertility and Embryonic Development (FEFD) .................................41 118 11.2.4.2 Fertility and PPND (FPPND).............................................................41 119 11.3 QUALIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVE TEST SYSTEMS FOR 120 REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE ......................................................................42 121 11.3.1 SELECTION FACTORS FOR THE ICH REFERENCE COMPOUND 122 LIST .............................................................................................................42 123 11.3.2 PERFORMANCE FACTORS .....................................................................43 124 11.3.3 ASSAY QUALIFICATION INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED TO 125 HEALTH
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification of Small Molecule Modulators of Diguanylate Cyclase
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/402909; this version posted August 28, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Identification of Small Molecule Modulators of Diguanylate Cyclase by FRET-based High-Throughput-Screening Matthias Christen1, , Cassandra Kamischke2, Hemantha D. Kulasekara2, Kathleen C. Olivas3, Bridget R. Kulasekara4, Beat Christen1, Toni Kline5, and Samuel I. Miller2,4,6, 1Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland 2Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States 3Seattle Genetics, Inc., 21823 30th Drive SE, Bothell, Washington 98021 4Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle 5Sutro Biopharma, 310 Utah Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080 6Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle The bacterial second messenger cyclic diguanosine monophos- parent role of c-di-GMP in the cell cycle and the presence of phate (c-di-GMP) is a key regulator of cellular motility, the cell many paralogous DGC enzymes controlling diverse cellular cycle, and biofilm formation with its resultant antibiotic tol- functions indicate that there is likely tight spatial and tem- erance, which may make chronic infections difficult to treat. poral regulation of c-di-GMP (10–12). Bacterial genomes Therefore, diguanylate cyclases, which regulate the spatiotem- encode multiple GGDEF domains in proteins with signal- poral production of c-di-GMP, may be attractive drug tar- sensing domains (13).
    [Show full text]
  • Stems for Nonproprietary Drug Names
    USAN STEM LIST STEM DEFINITION EXAMPLES -abine (see -arabine, -citabine) -ac anti-inflammatory agents (acetic acid derivatives) bromfenac dexpemedolac -acetam (see -racetam) -adol or analgesics (mixed opiate receptor agonists/ tazadolene -adol- antagonists) spiradolene levonantradol -adox antibacterials (quinoline dioxide derivatives) carbadox -afenone antiarrhythmics (propafenone derivatives) alprafenone diprafenonex -afil PDE5 inhibitors tadalafil -aj- antiarrhythmics (ajmaline derivatives) lorajmine -aldrate antacid aluminum salts magaldrate -algron alpha1 - and alpha2 - adrenoreceptor agonists dabuzalgron -alol combined alpha and beta blockers labetalol medroxalol -amidis antimyloidotics tafamidis -amivir (see -vir) -ampa ionotropic non-NMDA glutamate receptors (AMPA and/or KA receptors) subgroup: -ampanel antagonists becampanel -ampator modulators forampator -anib angiogenesis inhibitors pegaptanib cediranib 1 subgroup: -siranib siRNA bevasiranib -andr- androgens nandrolone -anserin serotonin 5-HT2 receptor antagonists altanserin tropanserin adatanserin -antel anthelmintics (undefined group) carbantel subgroup: -quantel 2-deoxoparaherquamide A derivatives derquantel -antrone antineoplastics; anthraquinone derivatives pixantrone -apsel P-selectin antagonists torapsel -arabine antineoplastics (arabinofuranosyl derivatives) fazarabine fludarabine aril-, -aril, -aril- antiviral (arildone derivatives) pleconaril arildone fosarilate -arit antirheumatics (lobenzarit type) lobenzarit clobuzarit -arol anticoagulants (dicumarol type) dicumarol
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing 360O of Biochemical Imbalances to Restore Balance and Relieve Symptoms
    Addressing 360o of biochemical imbalances to restore balance and relieve symptoms. Product Guide Effective June 2015 Product availability subject to change without notice. View the most current catalog electronically at www.neuroscienceinc.com/productcatalog Dr. Gottfried Kellermann and Mieke Kellermann Ushering in a New Age of Personalized Care As NeuroScience, Inc. enters its 15th year in business, we reflect on the driving force behind our services- providing you, the practitioner, with tools that allow you to more efficiently and effectively care for your patients. Together with our laboratory partner, Pharmasan Labs, Inc. we pioneered the Assess and Address™ approach for personalized patient care. New and Exciting Direction We recognize the evolving changes in patient care and patient expectation from their healthcare practitioners. More than ever, patients are taking control of their health and demanding care that allows them to get better faster and enjoy the healthy lifestyle they deserve. NeuroScience, along with Pharmasan Labs, has taken the lead in focusing on a model that not only identifies the imbalances behind many symptoms but how the network of those imbalances indicates deeper issues. This network approach points you in the direction of the root cause of patient symptoms, which when resolved can lead to improved, long-term health outcomes. Never satisfied with the status quo, we will continue to innovate to provide you with unparalleled support toward this end. A Provider of Personalized, Clinical Solutions…this is WHO WE ARE. Together, NeuroScience and Pharmasan are committed to providing you with the clinical assessments and tools you need to thrive in this rapidly changing healthcare market while better serving your patients.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0005722 A1 Jennings-Spring (43) Pub
    US 20090005722A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0005722 A1 Jennings-Spring (43) Pub. Date: Jan. 1, 2009 (54) SKIN-CONTACTING-ADHESIVE FREE Publication Classification DRESSING (51) Int. Cl. Inventor: Barbara Jennings-Spring, Jupiter, A61N L/30 (2006.01) (76) A6F I3/00 (2006.01) FL (US) A6IL I5/00 (2006.01) Correspondence Address: AOIG 7/06 (2006.01) Irving M. Fishman AOIG 7/04 (2006.01) c/o Cohen, Tauber, Spievack and Wagner (52) U.S. Cl. .................. 604/20: 602/43: 602/48; 4771.5; Suite 2400, 420 Lexington Avenue 47/13 New York, NY 10170 (US) (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 12/231,104 A dressing having a flexible sleeve shaped to accommodate a Substantially cylindrical body portion, the sleeve having a (22) Filed: Aug. 29, 2008 lining which is substantially non-adherent to the body part being bandaged and having a peripheral securement means Related U.S. Application Data which attaches two peripheral portions to each other without (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/434,689, those portions being circumferentially adhered to the sleeve filed on May 16, 2006. portion. Patent Application Publication Jan. 1, 2009 Sheet 1 of 9 US 2009/0005722 A1 Patent Application Publication Jan. 1, 2009 Sheet 2 of 9 US 2009/0005722 A1 10 8 F.G. 5 Patent Application Publication Jan. 1, 2009 Sheet 3 of 9 US 2009/0005722 A1 13 FIG.6 2 - Y TIII Till "T fift 11 10 FIG.7 8 13 6 - 12 - Timir" "in "in "MINIII.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2012/170711 Al 13 December 2012 (13.12.2012) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2012/170711 Al 13 December 2012 (13.12.2012) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (72) Inventors; and G01N33/5 74 (2006.01) (75) Inventors/Applicants (for US only): PAWLOWSKI, Traci [US/US]; 2014 N Milkweed Loop, Phoenix, AZ (21) International Application Number: 85037 (US). YEATTS, Kimberly [US/US]; 109 E. Pierce PCT/US2012/041387 Street, Tempe, AZ 85281 (US). AKHAVAN, Ray (22) International Filing Date: [US/US]; 5804 Malvern Hill Ct, Haymarket, VA 201 69 7 June 2012 (07.06.2012) (US). (25) Filing Language: English (74) Agent: AKHAVAN, Ramin; Caris Science, Inc., 6655 N. MacArthur Blvd., Irving, TX 75039 (US). (26) Publication Language: English (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (30) Priority Data: kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, 61/494,196 7 June 201 1 (07.06.201 1) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, 61/494,355 7 June 201 1 (07.06.201 1) CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, 61/507,989 14 July 201 1 (14.07.201 1) DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): CARIS HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, LIFE SCIENCES LUXEMBOURG HOLDINGS, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, S.A.R.L [LU/LU]; Rue De Maraichers, L2124 Luxem MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, bourg, Grand-Duche De Luxembourg (LU).
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0228233 A1 Pawlowski Et Al
    US 20140228233A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0228233 A1 Pawlowski et al. (43) Pub. Date: Aug. 14, 2014 (54) CIRCULATING BOMARKERS FOR CANCER Publication Classification (76) Inventors: Traci Pawlowski, Laguna Hills, CA (51) Int. Cl. (US); Kimberly Yeatts, Tempe, AZ GOIN33/574 (2006.01) (US); Ray Akhavan, Haymarket, VA CI2O I/68 (2006.01) (US) (52) U.S. Cl. CPC ........ G0IN33/57434 (2013.01): CI2O I/6886 (21) Appl. No.: 14/124.548 (2013.01) USPC .............................. 506/9; 435/7.92; 435/723 (22) PCT Fled: Jun. 7, 2012 (57) ABSTRACT (86) PCT NO.: PCT/US 12/41387 Biomarkers can be assessed for diagnostic, therapy-related or S371 (c)(1), prognostic methods to identify phenotypes, such as a condi (2), (4) Date: Mar. 24, 2014 tion or disease, or the stage or progression of a disease, select candidate treatment regimens for diseases, conditions, dis ease stages, and stages of a condition, and to determine treat Related U.S. Application Data ment efficacy. Circulating biomarkers from a bodily fluid can (60) Provisional application No. 61/494,196, filed on Jun. be used in profiling of physiological states or determining 7, 2011, provisional application No. 61/494,355, filed phenotypes. These include nucleic acids, protein, and circu on Jun. 7, 2011, provisional application No. 61/507, lating structures Such as vesicles, and nucleic acid-protein 989, filed on Jul. 14, 2011. complexes. Patent Application Publication US 2014/0228233 A1 ?oueoseuon]-, ?oueoseuon]-, ?oueoseuon]-, Patent Application Publication Aug. 14, 2014 Sheet 3 of 22 US 2014/0228233 A1 ?oueoseuon]-, ?oueoseuon]-, ?oueoseuon]-, Patent Application Publication Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization
    No. 31874 Multilateral Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organ ization (with final act, annexes and protocol). Concluded at Marrakesh on 15 April 1994 Authentic texts: English, French and Spanish. Registered by the Director-General of the World Trade Organization, acting on behalf of the Parties, on 1 June 1995. Multilat ral Accord de Marrakech instituant l©Organisation mondiale du commerce (avec acte final, annexes et protocole). Conclu Marrakech le 15 avril 1994 Textes authentiques : anglais, français et espagnol. Enregistré par le Directeur général de l'Organisation mondiale du com merce, agissant au nom des Parties, le 1er juin 1995. Vol. 1867, 1-31874 4_________United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 1995 Table of contents Table des matières Indice [Volume 1867] FINAL ACT EMBODYING THE RESULTS OF THE URUGUAY ROUND OF MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS ACTE FINAL REPRENANT LES RESULTATS DES NEGOCIATIONS COMMERCIALES MULTILATERALES DU CYCLE D©URUGUAY ACTA FINAL EN QUE SE INCORPOR N LOS RESULTADOS DE LA RONDA URUGUAY DE NEGOCIACIONES COMERCIALES MULTILATERALES SIGNATURES - SIGNATURES - FIRMAS MINISTERIAL DECISIONS, DECLARATIONS AND UNDERSTANDING DECISIONS, DECLARATIONS ET MEMORANDUM D©ACCORD MINISTERIELS DECISIONES, DECLARACIONES Y ENTEND MIENTO MINISTERIALES MARRAKESH AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ACCORD DE MARRAKECH INSTITUANT L©ORGANISATION MONDIALE DU COMMERCE ACUERDO DE MARRAKECH POR EL QUE SE ESTABLECE LA ORGANIZACI N MUND1AL DEL COMERCIO ANNEX 1 ANNEXE 1 ANEXO 1 ANNEX
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Approach for Identifying the Molecular, Cellular, and Host Responses to Chemical Insults
    Integrated Approach for Identifying the Molecular, Cellular, and Host Responses to Chemical Insults Audrey E. Fischer, Emily P. English, Julia B. Patrone, Kathlyn Santos, Jody B. G. Proescher, Rachel S. Quizon, Kelly A. Van Houten, Robert S. Pilato, Eric J. Van Gieson, and Lucy M. Carruth e performed a pilot study to characterize the molecular, cellular, and whole-organism response to nonlethal chemical agent exposure in the central nervous system. Multiple methodologies were applied to measure in vitro enzyme inhibition, neuronal cell pathway signaling, and in vivo zebrafish neural development in response to challenge with two different classes of chemical compounds. While all compounds tested exhibited expected enzyme inhibitory activity against acetylcholinesterase (AChE), a well-characterized target of chemical agents, distinct differences between chemical exposures were detected in cellular toxicity and pathway target responses and were tested in a zebrafish model. Some of these differences have not been detected using conventional chemical toxicity screening methods. Taken together, the data demonstrate the potential value of an integrated, multimethodological approach for improved target and pathway identification for subsequent diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker development. INTRODUCTION To build capability and leverage new and growing cell models to complete living organisms. Regardless of biology and chemistry expertise at APL, a collabora- the model selected, challenges exist in sample collection, tive, cross-departmental effort was established through a dose determination, and biases inherent in each assay/ series of related independent research and development technology. Therefore, multiple experimental methodol- (IR&D) projects. The focus of this effort was on mitiga- ogies brought to bear on a particular biological question tion of chemical and biological threat agents.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) 11 4,134,792 Boguslaski Et Al
    United States Patent (19) 11 4,134,792 Boguslaski et al. 45) Jan. 16, 1979 54 SPECIFIC BINDING ASSAY WITH AN Immunoassays', Conference on Non-isotopic Immuno ENZYMEMODULATOR ASALABELNG assays, (1976). SUBSTANCE Primary Examiner-Alvin E. Tanenholtz 75) Inventors: Robert C. Boguslaski; Robert J. Assistant Examiner-C. A. Fan Carrico, both of Elkhart, Ind; James Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Andrew L. Klawitter E. Christner, Ann Arbor, Mich. 57 ABSTRACT A specific binding assay method employing, as a label 73) Assignee: Miles Laboratories, Inc., Elkhart, ing substance, a reversibly binding enzyme modulator Ind. for the detection of a ligand in a liquid medium. The 21 Appl. No.: 748,005 method follows conventional specific binding assay techniques of either the homogeneous or heterogeneous (22 Filed: Dec. 6, 1976 type wherein the liquid medium to be assayed is com bined with reagent means that includes a labeled conju 51) int. C.?...................... G01N 33/00; G01N 31/14 gate to form a binding reaction system having a bound 52 U.S. C. .............................. 195/99; 195/103.5A; species and a free-species of the conjugate. The amount 424/12 of conjugate resulting in the bound-species or the free 58) Field of Search .......................... 195/103.5 A, 99; species is a function of the amount of ligand present in 424/12 the liquid medium assayed. In the present invention, the labeled conjugate comprises a reversibly binding en 56 References Cited zyme modulator covalently linked to a binding compo U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS nent of the binding reaction system. The distribution of 3,817,837 6/1974 Rubenstein et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
    20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Biology
    Genome Biology This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Copyedited and fully formatted PDF and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon. The draft genome and transcriptome of Cannabis sativa Genome Biology 2011, 12:R102 doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-10-r102 Harm van Bakel ([email protected]) Jake M Stout ([email protected]) Atina G Cote ([email protected]) Carling M Tallon ([email protected]) Andrew G Sharpe ([email protected]) Timothy R Hughes ([email protected]) Jonathan E Page ([email protected]) ISSN 1465-6906 Article type Research Submission date 11 September 2011 Acceptance date 20 October 2011 Publication date 20 October 2011 Article URL http://genomebiology.com/2011/12/10/R102 This peer-reviewed article was published immediately upon acceptance. It can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for any purposes (see copyright notice below). Articles in Genome Biology are listed in PubMed and archived at PubMed Central. For information about publishing your research in Genome Biology go to http://genomebiology.com/authors/instructions/ © 2011 van Bakel et al. ; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The draft genome and transcriptome of Cannabis sativa Harm van Bakel1, Jake M Stout2,4, Atina G Cote1, Carling M Tallon2, Andrew G Sharpe2, Timothy R Hughes1,3* and Jonathan E Page2,4* 1Banting and Best Department of Medical Research and Terrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, 160 College St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thermo-Sensitive Gene Expression Signatures of Spermatogenesis Santosh K
    Yadav et al. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology (2018) 16:56 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0372-8 RESEARCH Open Access The thermo-sensitive gene expression signatures of spermatogenesis Santosh K. Yadav1†, Aastha Pandey1†, Lokesh Kumar1, Archana Devi1,2, Bhavana Kushwaha1,2, Rahul Vishvkarma1, Jagdamba P. Maikhuri1, Singh Rajender1,2 and Gopal Gupta1,2* Abstract Background: Spermatogenesis in most mammals (including human and rat) occurs at ~ 3 °C lower than body temperature in a scrotum and fails rapidly at 37 °C inside the abdomen. The present study investigates the heat-sensitive transcriptome and miRNAs in the most vulnerable germ cells (spermatocytes and round spermatids) that are primarily targeted at elevated temperature in a bid to identify novel targets for contraception and/or infertility treatment. Methods: Testes of adult male rats subjected to surgical cryptorchidism were obtained at 0, 24, 72 and 120 h post-surgery, followed by isolation of primary spermatocytes and round spermatids and purification to > 90% purity using a combination of trypsin digestion, centrifugal elutriation and density gradient centrifugation techniques. RNA isolated from these cells was sequenced by massive parallel sequencing technique to identify the most-heat sensitive mRNAs and miRNAs. Results: Heat stress altered the expression of a large number of genes by ≥2.0 fold, out of which 594 genes (286↑; 308↓) showed alterations in spermatocytes and 154 genes (105↑;49↓) showed alterations in spermatids throughout the duration of experiment. 62 heat-sensitive genes were common to both cell types. Similarly, 66 and 60 heat-sensitive miRNAs in spermatocytes and spermatids, respectively, were affected by ≥1.5 fold, out of which 6 were common to both the cell types.
    [Show full text]