DOCSLIB.ORG

Hawks and Doves

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hawks and Doves What influences decision-makers to decide to attack another country when AND DOVES HAWKS they are on the brink of war? The main aim of this study is to detect if there is a causal mechanism underlying the decision to attack another country when on the brink of war, and whether or not this mechanism differs between regime-types. It investigates whether or not regime-type, the nature of the conflict, the power used, and hawkish beliefs of decision-makers matter in this decision. DEMOCRATIC PEACE By addressing this question from a political psychological and comparative perspective, this dissertation tests the microfoundations of democratic peace theory simultaneously with alternative theories of decision-making during conflict resolution.The core analytical instrument is a decision-making DEMOCRATIC PEACE THEORY REVISITED experiment, executed in the US, Russia, and China. The experimental T results are triangulated with a large N study, and a case study. HEORY FEMKE E. BAKKER The overall results show that although the democratic peace as an empirical R EVISITE regularity might still be valid, the theoretical arguments to explain why democracies do not fight with each other turn out to have been built on D empirically unsupported foundations. This study argues that an actor- based approach towards decision-making processes within international relations offers important insights to the more structured-based theories of international relations. It thereby convincingly shows that the individual matters, also in international relations. F EMKE E. B AKKER Hawks and Doves Democratic Peace Theory Revisited i Photo cover: Paul Reeves Photography Photo back: Femke E. Bakker Cover design: Print Service Ede Print: Print Service Ede © 2018 Femke E. Bakker. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission from the proprietor © 2018 Femke E. Bakker. Alle rechten voorbehouden. Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden verveelvoudigd, opgeslagen in een geautomatiseerd gegevensbestand, of openbaar gemaakt, in enige vorm of op enigerlei wijze, hetzij elektronisch, mechanisch, door fotokopieën, opnamen, of op enige andere manier, zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de rechthebbende. ii Hawks and Doves Democratic Peace Theory Revisited Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof. mr. C.J.J.M. Stolker, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op dinsdag 15 mei 2018 klokke 15:00 uur door Femke Elisabeth Bakker geboren te Bergen op Zoom in 1972 iii Promotor: Prof. dr. Petr Kopecký Co-Promotoren: Dr. Niels van Willigen Dr. Michael Meffert Promotiecommissie: Prof. dr. Rudy Andeweg Prof. dr. Dirk DeBièvre University of Antwerpen Prof. dr. Margaret Hermann Syracuse University Prof. dr. Juliet Kaarbo University of Edinburgh Prof. dr. Wolfgang Wagner Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Paranimfen: Maudy Lohaus Senna Maatoug This research has been sponsored by Leiden University Fund/van Steeden, by the International Peace Research Association Foundation (IPRAF), and by the Laboratory for Comparative Social Research (LCSR). iv Acknowledgements Never have I worked on a project with such eagerness and fun as on my dissertation. I have learned so much about doing research, about writing, and, in particular, about myself. As a scholar and as a human being. I have been blessed with the help and focus of others on my way, and each of them has contributed in their own unique way to my thinking, my writing and my understanding during this process. I enjoyed working with an inspiring team of three great supervisors who have supported me unanimous. They respected my autonomy as a scholar, and always provided me with the feeling of trust that my project would work out as I wanted it to. Moreover, each brought their own expertise: Petr Kopecký’s theoretical clarity, and focus on the bigger picture, Niels van Willigen’s vast knowledge and understanding of IR theories and foreign policy making, and Michael Meffert’s methodological rigor and expertise in experiments have been of priceless support during our always fruitful (and cheerful) feedback sessions. Thank you so much. To organize and conduct the experiments, I have had tremendous help of many people. I thank Honorata Mazepus, Aleksandrina Skvortsova, Rebekah Tromble, Ting Luo, and Zheng Li for the translations of my scenario’s into Russian, English and Mandarin Chinese (respectively) of native quality, and Agata Mazepus for graphically mapping out my experimental world. I thank Eduard Ponarin, Tatiana Karabchuk, Ronald Inglehart, and Christian Welzel of HSE St Petersburg and the Laboratory of Comparative Social Research for their help to conduct the experiments in Russia, and Olesya Volchenko , Nina Iltschenko, Violetta Korsunova, Pavel Savchenko for their lingering research assistance on the Russian site. I thank Robin Best, Gregory Robinson, and Jonathan Krasno of Binghamton University for their help to execute the experiments in the US. And I thank Chunlong Lu of the Chinese University for Political Science and Law in Beijing, Fei Gao and Dani Stockman for their help to conduct the experiments in China, and Hua Zhang, Hong Hdadan, and Qi Ding for their devoted work as research assistants. I thank Ingrid van Heeringen for her administrative support and advice during the funding process. I love to think out loud, preferably together with others. I have been so lucky to have met a lot of people on my way that were also willing to brainstorm with me about my research, and I am so appreciative of them. I hereby would like to thank Dan Thomas, Dirk DeBièvre, Honorata Mazepus, Paul van Hooft, Michael Doyle, Margaret Hermann, Arjen Boin, Fransje Molenaar, Senna Maatoug, Jos Meester, Sybren Hardiek, Rozemarijn Lubbe, Frank de Zwart, Wouter Veenendaal, Laurenz Ennser- Jedenastik, Danie Stockmann, Maudy Lohaus, Donald Blondin, Huib Pellikaan, Maria Spirova, Kavita Heystek-Ziemann, Patrick Overeem, Ingrid van Biezen, Tom Louwerse, Tim Mickler, Joshua Kertzer, and participants of several conferences for the valuable discussions we have held. v And last but not least, I am so appreciative of some wonderful people in my life. Best daughters in the world: Nili & Levia. My dear friends Eytan, Wim, Nienke, Melinda, Maudy, Jeannette, Roos, Lejla, Patty, Abraham, Esther, and my beloved Leonard: thank each and all of you! Each of you has contributed in your own unique and special way to me being able to write this dissertation (and you know what I mean!). vi Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. v List of Tables .......................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... x Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................ 1 1.1 Not another research of the democratic peace?! ................................................................ 1 1.2 War or no war? That is the question. ................................................................................ 2 1.3 How is this research conducted? ...................................................................................... 3 1.4 Scientific and societal relevance ....................................................................................... 4 1.5 The chapters that follow .................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2 Individuals under Threat ........................................................ 9 2.1 At the roots of democratic peace theory ........................................................................... 9 2.2 What you believe is what you see ................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Liberal and Constructivist explanations ................................................................... 11 2.2.2. Realist and other system-level explanations .......................................................... 27 2.3 Individuals matter .......................................................................................................... 30 2.3.1 Individual level explanations ................................................................................... 32 2.4 Individuals under threat ................................................................................................. 33 2.5 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 35 Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework, Concepts & Methods ....................... 37 3.1 Threat perception ............................................................................................................ 37 3.2 The interstate conflict ..................................................................................................... 39 3.3 Possible moderating factors ........................................................................................... 42 3.4 Concept of military action .............................................................................................. 52 3.5
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Tradition of Ancient Greek Democracy and Its Importance for Modem Democracy
    DEMOCRAC AHMOKPATI The Tradition of Ancient Greek Democracy and its Importance for Modern Democracy Mogens Herman Hansen The Tradition of Ancient Greek Democracy and its Importance for Modem Democracy B y M ogens H erman H ansen Historisk-filosofiske Meddelelser 93 Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters Copenhagen 2005 Abstract The two studies printed here investigate to what extent there is a con­ nection between ancient and modem democracy. The first study treats the tradition of ancient Greek democracy, especially the tradition of Athenian democracy from ca. 1750 to the present day. It is argued that in ideology there is a remarkable resemblance between the Athenian democracy in the Classical period and the modem liberal democracy in the 19th and 20th centuries. On the other hand no direct tradition con­ nects modem liberal democracy with its ancient ancestor. Not one single Athenian institution has been copied by a modem democracy, and it is only from ca. 1850 onwards that the ideals cherished by the Athenian democrats were referred to approvingly by modem cham­ pions of democracy. It is in fact the IT technology and its potential for a return to a more direct form of democracy which has given rise to a hitherto unmatched interest in the Athenian democratic institutions. This is the topic of the second study in which it is argued that the focus of the contemporary interest is on the Athenian system of sortition and rotation rather than on the popular assembly. Contents The Tradition of Democracy from Antiquity to the Present Time .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Peace Theory: Validity in Relation to the European Union and 'Peaceful' Cooperation Between United States and China
    Vol.7(2), pp. 15-17, May 2016 DOI: 10.5897/IJPDS2015.0234 Article Number: 1BC2EFE58946 International Journal of Peace and ISSN 2141–6621 Copyright © 2016 Development Studies Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPDS Short Communication The democratic peace theory: Validity in relation to the European Union and 'Peaceful' cooperation between United States and China Nibal Attia Department of political Science, Misr University for Science and Technology, Egypt. Recieved 20 April, 2015; Accepted 31 March, 2016 According to the democratic peace theory, democratic states are less likely to go to war with other democratic states. Consequently, the ultimate goal of the theory is to create a world of democracies that is, a world without war. However, from the realist perspective in some cases democracies go to war with other democracies to influence their power. This paper will critically analyze the validity of democratic peace theory in its assumption that democracies rarely fight each other, by providing the example of the establishment of the European Union, in which democracies are co-operating with each other to achieve their common good. The paper is divided into three parts; the first one will provide an explanation of the Peace Democratic theory and its main assumptions. The second one will evaluate to what extent these assumptions are practical ones through the application of the case studies. Then a counter-argument for one of its assumption will be included questioning the core claim of the democratic peace theory from the commercial peace theory perspective. Key words: Democracy, peace theory, war, co-operation.
    [Show full text]
  • What Kant Preaches to the UN: Democratic Peace Theory and “Preventing the Scourge of War”
    EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES − INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL ON EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES VOLUME 9, NUMBER 1 (16), PP 65-84, OCTOBER 2018 What Kant preaches to the UN: democratic peace theory and “preventing the scourge of war” Bekim Sejdiu1 ABSTRACT This paper exploits academic parameters of the democratic peace theory to analyze the UN’s principal mission of preserving the world peace. It inquires into the intellectual horizons of the democratic peace theory – which originated from the Kant’s “perpetual peace” – with the aim of prescribing an ideological recipe for establishing solid foundation for peace among states. The paper argues that by promoting democracy and supporting democratization, the UN primarily works to achieve its fundamental mission of preventing the scourge of war. It explores practical activities that the UN undertakes to support democracy, as well as the political and normative aspects of such an enterprise, is beyond the reach of this analysis. Rather, the focus of the analy- sis is on the democratic peace theory. The confirmation of the scientific credibility of this theory is taken as a sufficient argument to claim that by supporting democracy the UN would advance one of its major purposes, namely the goal of peace. KEY WORDS: democracy, peace, Kant, UN POVZETEK Prispevek na osnovi teorije demokratičnega miru analizira temeljno misijo OZN, to je ohranitev svetovnega miru. Poglablja se v intelektualna obzorja teorije demokratičnega miru – ki izhaja iz Kantovega “večnega miru” – s ciljem začrtati ideološki recept za vzpostavitev čvrstih teme- ljev za mir med državami. Prispevek zagovarja hipotezo, da OZN s promoviranjem demokracije in z njenim podpiranjem predvsem prispeva k izpolnitvi svojega temeljnega poslanstva, to je preprečevati izbruh vojn.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of War and Peace
    1 THEORIES OF WAR AND PEACE POLI SCI 631 Rutgers University Fall 2018 Jack S. Levy [email protected] http://fas-polisci.rutgers.edu/levy/ Office Hours: Hickman Hall #304, Tuesday after class and by appointment "War is a matter of vital importance to the State; the province of life or death; the road to survival or ruin. It is mandatory that it be thoroughly studied." Sun Tzu, The Art of War In this seminar we undertake a comprehensive review of the theoretical and empirical literature on interstate war, focusing primarily on the causes of war and the conditions of peace but giving some attention to the conduct and termination of war. We emphasize research in political science but include some coverage of work in other disciplines. We examine the leading theories, their key causal variables, the paths or mechanisms through which those variables lead to war or to peace, and the degree of empirical support for various theories. Our survey includes research utilizing a variety of methodological approaches: qualitative, quantitative, experimental, formal, and experimental. Our primary focus, however, is on the logical coherence and analytic limitations of the theories and the kinds of research designs that might be useful in testing them. The seminar is designed primarily for graduate students who want to understand – and ultimately contribute to – the theoretical and empirical literature in political science on war, peace, and security. Students with different interests and students from other departments can also benefit from the seminar and are also welcome. Ideally, members of the seminar will have some familiarity with basic issues in international relations theory, philosophy of science, research design, and statistical methods.
    [Show full text]
  • A Challenge to Democratic Peace Theory: U.S. Intervention in Chile, 1973
    A Challenge to Democratic Peace Theory: U.S. Intervention in Chile, 1973 by Carissa Faye Margraf Washington and Lee University Class of 2021 [email protected] In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts in Politics with Honors Thesis Advisor: Dr. Zoila Ponce de Leon Second Reader: Dr. Brian Alexander Lexington, Virginia Spring 2021 Margraf 2 Acknowledgements I would like to thank those who have supported me throughout my academic journey. Without you, I would not be where I am today. To my family, I will forever be grateful for the hours that you allowed me to ramble about Chile and covert action as I refined my argument, and for the attentive nods and encouragement throughout this process. To my friends, thank you for the much-needed thesis breaks of badminton, movies, and check-ins after long nights. I would also like to thank my wonderful Thesis Advisor, Dr. Zoila Ponce de Leon, for her endless support and dedication, and my Second Reader, Dr. Brian Alexander, for his thorough feedback and enthusiasm. Finally, I would like to thank my mom, who we lost at the start of my sophomore year. While she is not here to experience these final moments of my time at Washington and Lee University, I am confident that she would be glowing with pride. Margraf 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS I: EVERY THEORETICAL CHALLENGE REQUIRES A CATALYST o Abstract o Introduction o Thesis II: METHODOLOGY III: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND o Democratic Peace Theory ▪ Origin ▪ Contents of the Theory ▪ Normative vs Structural Logic ▪ Debates of
    [Show full text]
  • Governance, Democracy Peace
    AND GOVERNANCE, DEMOCRACY PEACE HOW STATE CAPACITY AND REGIME TYPE INFLUENCE THE PROSPECTS FOR WAR AND PEACE David Cortright with Conor Seyle and Kristen Wall © 2013 One Earth Future Foundation The One Earth Future Foundation was founded in 2007 with the goal of supporting research and practice in the area of peace and governance. OEF believes that a world beyond war can be achieved by the development of new and effective systems of cooperation, coordination, and decision making. We believe that business and civil society have important roles to play in filling governance gaps in partnership with states. When states, business, and civil society coordinate their efforts, they can achieve effective, equitable solutions to global problems. As an operating foundation, we engage in research and practice that supports our overall mission. Research materials from OEF envision improved governance structures and policy options, analyze and document the performance of existing governance institutions, and provide intellectual support to the field operations of our implementation projects. Our active field projects apply our research outputs to existing governance challenges, particularly those causing threats to peace and security. ONE EARTH FUTURE FOUNDATION 525 Zang Street | Suite C Broomfield, CO 80021 USA Ph. +1.303.533.1715 | Fax +1 303.309.0386 ABOUT THE AUTHORS David Cortright is the director of Policy Studies at the Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies at the University of Notre Dame and chair of the board of directors of the Fourth Freedom Forum. He is the author of seventeen books, including the Adelphi volume Towards Nuclear Zero, with Raimo Vayrynen (Routledge, 2010) and Peace: A History of Movements and Ideas (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Postcolonial Theory and Law: a Critical Introduction
    Alpana Roy* POSTCOLONIAL THEORY AND LAW: A CRITICAL INTRODUCTION ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to encourage legal scholars to engage more actively with postcolonial discourse. To this end, the article will outline key concepts in postcolonial theory — such as colonialism, imperialism, decolonisation and neo-colonialism, and will also trace the work of major theorists in this area — Frantz Fanon, Homi Bhabha, Gayatri Spivak, and Edward Said. As this article presents itself as a contribution to the study of postcolonial theory and the law, it will focus on contemporary developments in Australian law reform. Specifically, the article will discuss the Law Reform Commission of Western Australia’s Final Report on Aboriginal Customary Laws. I INTRODUCTION hile conversations between law and postcolonialism have been ‘infrequent’1 and remain largely unmapped, postcolonial discourse is now the major methodological tool with which to trace the patterns of epistemological and pedagogic reterritorialisation of the Wnon-Western w orld. With respect to legal discourse, Peter Fitzpatrick and Eve Darian-Smith suggest that ‘postcolonialism is now the main mode in which the West’s relation to its “other” is critically explored, and law has been…[in] the forefront of that very relation’.2 Nevertheless, while postcolonial theory’s status as a discipline may arguably be more established in other academic areas, it is increasingly being recognised by legal scholars as a methodological tool with which to scrutinise the nature of legal discourse.3 * Lecturer, Faculty of Law, University of Technology, Sydney. I would like to note my sincere thanks to Jenni Millbank for all of her constructive comments on various drafts of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Democracy Create World Peace? Democratic Peace Theory: Misguided Policy Or Panacea
    Can Democracy Create World Peace? Democratic Peace Theory: Misguided Policy or Panacea Alynna Lyon Department of Political Science an democracy create world peace? The idea that Democratic Peace and Political Science representative liberal governments can dimin- In the 1970s, scholars began using the tools of social ish the occurrence of war is one of the most science to explore this thesis and have uncovered a Cappealing, influential, and at the same time, contro- significant amount of empirical research that supports versial ideas of our time. For centuries, thinkers have these claims. Today there are over a hundred authors proposed that a world of democratic countries would who have published scholarly works on the Democratic be a peaceful world. As early as 1795, Immanuel Kant Peace Theory. One study examined 416 country-to- wrote in his essay Perpetual Peace that democracies country wars from 1816-1980 and found that only 12 are less warlike. Within the United States, this idea has were fought between democracies.3 Bruce Russett writes held particular sway. Presidents like Woodrow Wilson that “Established democracies fought no wars against have embraced this idea and advocated the creation of one another during the entire twentieth century.”4 democracies to create a less belligerent world. Harry S. Another proponent found that that the probability of Truman once said, “Totalitarian regimes imposed on any two democracies engaging in war is less than half free peoples…undermine the foundation of internation- of 1%!5 This is not to say that democracies have not gone al peace and hence security of the United States.”1 to war, but when considering pairs (or dyads) of democ- The Democratic Peace Theory is based on several racies, there are almost no instances of war between premises.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratization and Democratic Peace. Sarah K
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses College of Arts & Sciences 5-2019 Democratization and Democratic peace. Sarah K. Simon University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/honors Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Simon, Sarah K., "Democratization and Democratic peace." (2019). College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses. Paper 198. Retrieved from https://ir.library.louisville.edu/honors/198 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at ThinkIR: The nivU ersity of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The nivU ersity of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Simon 1 Democratization and Democratic Peace By Sarah Katherine Simon Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Graduation summa cum laude and for Graduation with Honors from the Department of Political Science University of Louisville May 2019 Simon 2 I. Introduction The theory of democratic peace states that democratic countries will not go to war with other democratic countries (Rasler 2005). A country must first consolidate to a democracy before it can experience the benefits of democratic peace; therefore, how will the previous regime affect the transition process? Taking previous regime into consideration would assist transitioning governments by determining if certain types of regimes are more likely to have a successful democratic transition (Schneider 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks on the Ancient Evidence for Democratic Peace Author(S): Spencer R
    Remarks on the Ancient Evidence for Democratic Peace Author(s): Spencer R. Weart Source: Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 38, No. 5 (Sep., 2001), pp. 609-613 Published by: Sage Publications, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/424778 . Accessed: 10/03/2011 14:37 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sageltd. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Sage Publications, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Peace Research. http://www.jstor.org ? 2001 Journal PeaceResearch, )r^^^^Q^M of vol. 38, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Democracy Create World Peace?
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository The University Dialogue Discovery Program 2007 Can democracy create world peace? Alynna J. Lyon University of New Hampshire, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/discovery_ud Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Lyon, Alynna J., "Can democracy create world peace?" (2007). The University Dialogue. 24. https://scholars.unh.edu/discovery_ud/24 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Discovery Program at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The University Dialogue by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Can Democracy Create World Peace? Democratic Peace Theory: Misguided Policy or Panacea Alynna Lyon Department of Political Science an democracy create world peace? The idea that Democratic Peace and Political Science representative liberal governments can dimin- In the 1970s, scholars began using the tools of social ish the occurrence of war is one of the most science to explore this thesis and have uncovered a Cappealing, influential, and at the same time, contro- significant amount of empirical research that supports versial ideas of our time. For centuries, thinkers have these claims. Today there are over a hundred authors proposed that a world of democratic countries would who have published scholarly works on the Democratic be a peaceful world. As early as 1795, Immanuel Kant Peace Theory. One study examined 416 country-to- wrote in his essay Perpetual Peace that democracies country wars from 1816-1980 and found that only 12 are less warlike.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging the Democratic Peace Theory - the Role of US-China Relationship Toni Ann Pazienza University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 3-25-2014 Challenging the Democratic Peace Theory - The Role of US-China Relationship Toni Ann Pazienza University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Scholar Commons Citation Pazienza, Toni Ann, "Challenging the Democratic Peace Theory - The Role of US-China Relationship" (2014). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5098 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Challenging the Democratic Peace Theory: The Role of the U.S.-China Relationship by Toni A. Pazienza A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Government and International Affairs College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Steven C. Roach, Ph.D. Harry E. Vanden, Ph.D. Earl Conteh-Morgan, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 25, 2014 Keywords: Kant, Democratic Peace Theory, Democracy, Communism, United States, China, Liberalism, Realism, and Trade Interdependence Copyright © 2014, Toni A. Pazienza Table of Contents Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]