DOCSLIB.ORG

Geologic Map of the Frederick 30' × 60' Quadrangle, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geologic Map of the Frederick 30' × 60' Quadrangle, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia Prepared in cooperation with the Maryland Geological Survey Geologic Map of the Frederick 30’ × 60’ Quadrangle, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia By Scott Southworth, David K. Brezinski, Avery Ala Drake, Jr., William C. Burton, Randall C. Orndorff, Albert J. Froelich, James E. Reddy, Danielle Denenny, and David L. Daniels Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 2889 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Cover: Color-shaded-relief image of the Frederick 30´ × 60´ quadrangle showing high topographic elevations in shades of red and low topographic elevations in shades of blue. The hillside is illuminated from the east. The highest elevation is 1,920 ft above sea level on Blue Ridge at the southwestern part of the map area in Loudoun County, Va., and the lowest elevation is 140 ft above sea level along the Potomac River at Great Falls, Montgomery County, Md. The higher elevation regions, such as the ridges of the Blue Ridge province, portions of the Great Valley of the Valley and Ridge province, and Sugarloaf Mountain and parts of the Westminster terrane in the Piedmont province, are in contrast to the lower elevation region of the Culpeper and Gettysburg basins, Frederick Valley, and Potomac River val- ley within the Piedmont province in the eastern half of the map area. The elevation differences are a function of rock hardness and different erosion histories. Image produced by David L. Daniels, USGS, using a 5-m digital elevation model of USGS. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to repro- duce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Southworth, Scott, Brezinski, D.K., Drake, A.A., Jr., Burton, W.C., Orndorff, R.C., Froelich, A.J., Reddy, J.E., Denenny, Dani- elle, and Daniels, D.L., 2007, Geologic map of the Frederick 30´ × 60´ quadrangle, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 2889, scale 1:100,000, 42-p. text. ISBN 978-1-4113-1165-7 iii Contents Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Great Valley Section of the Valley and Ridge Province ...........................................................................2 Geologic Setting ....................................................................................................................................2 Lower Paleozoic Sedimentary Rocks .......................................................................................4 Tomstown Formation ..........................................................................................................4 Waynesboro Formation ......................................................................................................4 Elbrook Limestone ..............................................................................................................4 Conococheague Limestone and Big Spring Station Member ....................................4 Beekmantown Group .............................................................................................................4 Stonehenge Limestone and Stoufferstown Member ....................................................4 Rockdale Run Formation ....................................................................................................4 Pinesburg Station Dolomite ..............................................................................................5 St. Paul Group ......................................................................................................................5 Chambersburg Limestone .................................................................................................5 Martinsburg Formation .....................................................................................................5 Structure.................................................................................................................................................5 Metamorphism ......................................................................................................................................5 Blue Ridge Province ......................................................................................................................................5 Geologic Setting ....................................................................................................................................5 Mesoproterozoic Rocks ..............................................................................................................6 Neoproterozoic Rocks ................................................................................................................6 Cobbler Mountain Alkali Feldspar Quartz Syenite of the Robertson River Igneous Suite .........................................................................................................6 Metasedimentary Rocks of the Fauquier Group and Swift Run Formation ...............6 Metadiabase and Metarhyolite Dikes .............................................................................7 Metavolcanic and Metasedimentary Rocks of the Catoctin Formation ....................7 Paleozoic Clastic Metasedimentary Rocks of the Chilhowee Group ..................................7 Loudoun Formation .............................................................................................................7 Weverton Formation ...........................................................................................................7 Harpers Formation ..............................................................................................................8 Antietam Formation ............................................................................................................8 Carbonaceous Phyllite .......................................................................................................8 Tomstown Formation East of Catoctin Mountain ...........................................................8 Structure.................................................................................................................................................8 Mesoproterozoic ..........................................................................................................................8 Neoproterozoic ............................................................................................................................8 Paleozoic .......................................................................................................................................9 Folds ......................................................................................................................................9 Cleavage ...............................................................................................................................9 Faults .....................................................................................................................................9 Mesozoic .......................................................................................................................................9 Metamorphism ......................................................................................................................................9 iv Mesoproterozoic ..........................................................................................................................9 Paleozoic .....................................................................................................................................10 Piedmont Province.......................................................................................................................................10 Geologic Setting ..................................................................................................................................10 Culpeper and Gettysburg Basins ............................................................................................10 Chatham Group .....................................................................................................................10 Manassas Sandstone ......................................................................................................10 Bull Run Formation ...........................................................................................................11 Catharpin Creek Formation .............................................................................................11 Mount Zion Church Basalt ..............................................................................................11 Meriden Group ......................................................................................................................11 Midland Formation ............................................................................................................11
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vol. 9, No. 1 (2004): Full Issue
    Journal X Volume 9 Number 1 Autumn 2004 Article 7 2004 Vol. 9, No. 1 (2004): Full issue Journal Editors Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jx Recommended Citation Editors, Journal (2004) "Vol. 9, No. 1 (2004): Full issue," Journal X: Vol. 9 : No. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jx/vol9/iss1/7 This Complete Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the English at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal X by an authorized editor of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PR Editors: Vol. 9, No. 1 (2004): Full issue 1 a journal . J68 v.9:1 (2004) in culture & criticism Journal X • Volume 9 • Number 1 Autumn 2004 Bordering the Subjunctive in Thomas Pynchon's Mason & Dixon Adam LiFshey The Novelist and the Critics: Frances Burney's Manuscript Corrections and Additions to The Wanderer, or, Female Difficulties Robert L. Mack The Last Iron Gate: Negotiating the Incarceral Spaces of John Edgar Wideman's Brothers and Keepers Michael P. Moreno Frederick Douglass's Lost Cause: Lynching and the Body Politic in "The Lessons of the Hour" Randy Prus Reading for Pleasure: Up In Smoke: Trouble and Tobacco in Yoknapatawpha County Sharon Desmond Paradiso Published by eGrove, 2004 1 Journal X, Vol. 9 [2004], No. 1, Art. 7 Volume 9 • Number 1 • Autumn 2004 CONTENTS Bordering the Subjunctive in Thomas Pynchon's Mason & Dixon Adam LiFshey 1 The Novelist and the Critics: Frances Burney's Manuscript Corrections and Additions to The Wanderer, or, Female Difficulties Robert L.
    [Show full text]
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cabins Availability Charts in This Issue
    ISSN 098—8154 The Newsletter of the Potomac Appalachian Trail Club Volume 35, Number 3 118 Park Street, S.E., Vienna, VA 22180-4609 March 2006 www.patc.net PATC Signs Lease Agreement with ATC for Management of Bears Den n Dec. 20, 2005, PATC President Tom OJohnson signed a two-year lease agree- ment with ATC for management of the Bears Den Trail Center located on the Appalachian Trail just off of Rte. 7 in Virginia. There is an official marker on Rte. 7 west- bound just before the turnoff on to Rte. 601 for Bears Dens that reads as follows: Appalachian Trail and Bears Den This 2,100-mile-long hiking path passes through 14 states from Mount Katahdin, Maine, to Springer Mountain, Ga., along the ridges of the Appalachian Mountains. Conceived in 1921 by Benton MacKaye, the trail was completed in 1937. It was designated a National Scenic Trail in 1968. One-half mile to the south along the trail is Bears Den, a Dave Starzell Bob WIlliams and Tom Johnson signing the agreement to transfer See Bears Den page management of Bears Den to PATC Web Site Breakthrough! Cabins Availability Charts In This Issue . Council Fire . .2 ne of PATC’s crown jewels is its 32 navigate forward or backward a week at a Tom’s Trail Talk . .3 rentable cabins, many only for member time through the calendar. The starting day of Chain Saw Course . .3 O Annual Family Weekend . .4 use. For the first time you may now visit the the week will be the day you are visiting the Smokeys Environmental Impact .
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemistry of Rocks in the Wissahickon Valley
    The Chemistry of Rocks in the Wissahickon Valley Cristobal Carambo Philadelphia High School for Girls Problem Statement Rationale Proposed Unit of Study Objectives Background Standards Used in the Unit Lesson Plans Appendix Bibliography Problem Statement The majority of my students are sophomores who have had little to no science during their middle school years. This lack of a comprehensive science program in their formative years explains much of their difficulty connecting science to their daily life. This is most evident when I introduce the periodic table of elements and attempt to explain how elements combine to form the many compounds that are necessary in our lives. Although I use many common household chemicals to illustrate the importance of elements and compounds, students still fail to fully appreciate the role that chemistry plays in our understanding of the physical world. I have often attempted to use the chemistry of the rock cycle to connect our class to the real world but many students are unaware of the rock cycle, or have had a cursory general survey of rocks. Understanding the role that elements play in the formation of minerals and how those minerals combine to form the many rock types and materials in our world would create a vibrant connection between the static elements on the periodic table and the world in which we live. In our conversations of the world around us, I have noticed that many of my students have had little or no experiences in natural settings where they could explore and make connections between the concepts learned in the classroom and their environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mason Dixon Land Survey
    Historic American Land Surveys: The Mason Dixon Land Survey 4 Hours PDH Academy PO Box 449 Pewaukee, WI 53072 (888) 564-9098 www.pdhacademy.com HISTORIC AMERICAN LAND SURVEYS – THE MASON-DIXON LINE SURVEY BY: NATHAN J. WALKER, PLS Objective: As the retracement surveyors of today are called upon to “follow in the footsteps” of those original surveyors who went before, it is useful and instructive to learn how and why the early surveyors conducted their projects. It is likewise worthwhile to consider the outcomes and consequences of the early land surveys that shaped and continue to influence America. This course seeks to study the historically important Mason-Dixon Line survey, the circumstances that led to the necessity of the survey, the surveyors who conducted the survey, and the methods and techniques they employed to complete their daunting project. Also, the lasting political and cultural effects of the survey will be examined and a timeline of events relating to the survey will be presented. Course Outline: The Mason-Dixon Line Survey A. Biographical Overview of Charles Mason B. Biographical Overview of Jeremiah Dixon C. Mason and Dixon’s Initial Expedition Section 1 – Historical Background 1. The Province of Maryland 2. The Province of Pennsylvania 3. The Penn-Calvert Boundary Dispute Section 2 – Surveying the Lines 1. Scope of the Survey 2. Celestial Observation and a Commencing Point 3. The Point of Beginning 4. The Tangent Line 5. The West Line and the North Line 6. Extending the West Line Section 3 – Lasting Effects of the Survey 1. The Delaware Wedge 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Piedmont in the Savage and Relay Quadrangles, Howard, Baltimore, and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic Map of the Piedmont in the Savage and Relay Quadrangles, Howard, Baltimore, and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland By Avery Ala Drake, Jr.1 Open-File Report 98-757 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 'Reston, VA 1998 GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE PIEDMONT IN THE SAVAGE AND RELAY QUADRANGLES, HOWARD, BALTIMORE, AND ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTIES, MARYLAND by Avery Ala Drake, Jr. INTRODUCTION The Piedmont in the Savage and Relay quadrangles (fig. 1) is largely in Howard County, Maryland. The northeasternmost part is in Baltimore County, Maryland and about 0.03 square miles is in Anne Arundel County. Most of the area is suburban and almost all outcrops are restricted to the Patapsco, Middle Patuxent, Little Patuxent, and other stream valleys. Crystalline rocks of the central Appalachian Piedmont within these quadrangles are overlain in many places by Coastal Plain deposits of Cretaceous age. Alluvium occurs along most streams. The geology of adjacent quadrangles on the west and south has been mapped by Drake (in press, unpublished data, 1991-1997) and J.N. Roen and A.A. Drake, Jr. (in press), and that to the north and east by Crowley (1976). The tectonics of the area were interpreted by Crowley (1976) and Drake (1995). Aeromagnetic and gravity surveys of the area were interpreted by Bromery (1968).
    [Show full text]
  • Patuxent River Watershed Functional Plan
    TI11E Functional \laster Plan for the Patuxent Ril'er Watershed in \lontgome1y Count) AUTHOR The \lai-·land-\ational Capital Park and Planning Commi:sion Functional \laster Plan for tl1e Patuxent Ril'er \\'atershed in \lontgomei- Count)· DATE \01·ember 1993 PUNNING AGENCY The \Ian land-\ational Capital Park and Planning Cammi ion s~s~ Georgia Al'enue Sill'er Spring. \\D 20910-3~60 SOURCE OF COPIES The \lai-land-\ational Capital Park and Planning Commission s~s~Georgia Al'enue Siller Spring.\!D 20910-3"6o ABSTRACT This document contains the text. 11ith supporting graphics. for the Functional \laster Plan for tl1e Patuxent Rim\\ atershed in \lontgomm Count\. This plan amends the General Plan for the ,\lan·land-\X'ashington Regional District and the \laster Plan for Highwa1, for the \lard and-\\ ashington Regional District. and the following area master plans: Damascus. Olnel'. Sandi Spring-Ashton Special Stud, Area. Eastern \lontgomei-· Count\·. as well as the Functional \laster Plan for Presefl'ation of Agriculture and Rural Open Space. and the Patuxent Ril'er \\ atershed Park .\laster Plan. COPYRIGHT The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 1993 PUBLISHED BY The Montgomery County Planning Department of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland 20910.3760 APPROVED BY The Montgomery County Council October 1993 ADOPTED BY The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission November 1993 THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION is a bi-county agency created by the General Assembly of Maryland in 1927. The Commission's geographic authority extends to the great majority of Montgomery and Prince George's Counties; the Maryland-Washington Regional District (M-NCPPC planningjurisdiction) comprises 1,001 square miles, while the Metropolitan District (parks) comprises 919 square miles, in the two counties.
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH 29 2007 Frederick County Mills ACCOMMODATION FACTORY
    MARCH 29 2007 Frederick County Mills ACCOMMODATION FACTORY ( ) David Foute advertised wool carding at Accommodation Factory, Dumb Quarter extended, Frederick-Town Herald, June 23, 1827. ADAMS FULLING MILL (9) Frederick Brown advertised wool carding at 6-1/4 cents per pound at the old establishment of Mr. Adams, about 2 miles south of New Market, Frederick-Town Herald, May 11, 1831, p. 4. He had offered fulling and dyeing there (Mrs. Adams’), Ibid., August 20, 1825. This was presumably the fulling mill shown on the 1808 Charles Varlé map on Bush Creek, 0.33 mile north of the present Weller Road, SE of Monrovia. The 1860 Bond map showed the Mrs. H. Norris wool factory, while the 1878 atlas showed Mrs. Norris with a grist and sawmill. ADLER ROPEWALK (F) A ropewalk operated by John Adler in 1819 was on South Market Street, Frederick. The building was occupied in 1976 by Federated Charities (See, Ralph F. Martz, “Richard Potts,” Frederick Post, May 11, 1976, p. A-7). ADELSPERGER MILL CO (5) This steam foundry and machine shop was listed in the 1860 census of manufactures with $14,000 capital investment and 25 employees; annual output was $5000 in castings and $25,000 in machinery. ADLUM STILL ( ) John Adlum advertised to sell two stills, 106-gallon and 49-gallon, Frederick-Town Herald, August 14, 1802. AETNA GLASS WORKS (7) Thomas Johnson purchased some of Amelung’s machinery and built a new Aetna Glass Works on Bush Creek, hauling sand from Ellicott City in empty wheat wagons. He later built another works on Tuscarora Creek, The Potomac, p.
    [Show full text]
  • View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX
    GIJIDEBOOJ< TECTONICS AND. CAMBRIAN·ORDO'IICIAN STRATIGRAPHY CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Pifftbutgh Geological Society with the Appalachian Geological Society Septembet, 1963 TECTONICS AND CAMBRIAN -ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY in the CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA FIELD CONFERENCE SPONSORS Pittsburgh Geological Society Appalachian Geological Society September 19, 20, 21, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Cambro-Ordovician Stratigraphy of Central and South-Central 3 Pennsylvania by W. R. Wagner Fold Patterns and Continuous Deformation Mechanisms of the 13 Central Pennsylvania Folded Appalachians by R. P. Nickelsen Road Log 1st day: Bedford to State College 31 2nd day: State College to Hagerstown 65 3rd day: Hagerstown to Bedford 11.5 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Wagner paper: Figure 1. Stratigraphic cross-section of Upper-Cambrian 4 in central and south-central Pennsylvania Figure 2. Stratigraphic section of St.Paul-Beekmantown 6 rocks in central Pennsylvania and nearby Maryland Nickelsen paper: Figure 1. Geologic map of Pennsylvania 15 Figure 2. Structural lithic units and Size-Orders of folds 18 in central Pennsylvania Figure 3. Camera lucida sketches of cleavage and folds 23 Figure 4. Schematic drawing of rotational movements in 27 flexure folds Road Log: Figure 1. Route of Field Trip 30 Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for route of Field Trip 34 Figure 3. Cross-section of Martin, Miller and Rankey wells- 41 Stops I and II Figure 4. Map and cross-sections in sinking Valley area- 55 Stop III Figure 5. Panorama view of Valley and Ridge structures from ?:r Stop IX Figure 6. Camera lucida sketch of sedimentary features in ?6 contorted shale - Stop X Figure 7- Cleavage and bedding relationship at Stop XI ?9 Figure 8.
    [Show full text]
  • PALEOZOIC STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN of Central Pennsylvania
    PALEOZOIC STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN of Central Pennsylvania _____________________________________________________________________*Ridge Makers System & Series Formation and Members General Description Llewellyn Formation Cycles of conglomerate or sandstone; underclay coal, shale Pnn. L & N 2000’+ Pottsville Formation* Cycles of conglomerate or sandstone; underclay coal, shale L & M 1400’ Mauch Chunk Grayish red and gray shale M 5000’ Miss. Pocono* Mount Carbon Gray to buff, medium grained, cross-bedded sandstone 1600’ 940’ Beckville Gray to buff, medium grained, cross-bedded sandstone Lower 225’ Spechty Kopf Gray, fine and medium grained sandstone conglomerate 435’ near middle and base Catskill Duncannon Asymmetric, upward-fining fluvial cycles, basal nonred, locally 7250’ 2000’ conglomeratic sandstone is overlain by grayish red sandstone and siltstones Sherman Creek Interbedded grayish red claystone and fine grained, cross- 2400’ bedded sandstone Upper Irish Valley Interbedded, grayish red and olive gray sandstone, siltstone, 2850’ shale, overlain upward-fining cyclic deposits of gray sandstone and red siltstone Trimmers Rock Medium gray siltstone and shale, with fine grained sandstone in 2000’ upper part; graded bedding common Harrell Olive and medium light gray shale 200’ Mahantango Sherman Ridge* Olive gray, fossiliferous, claystone with interbedded fine 1600’ 600’ sandstones which coarsen upward Montebello Olive gray, medium grained, locally conglomeratic, fossiliferous 600’ sandstone, interbedded with siltstone and claystone in upward-
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And
    82° 81° 80° 79° 78° EXPLANATION West Virginia county boundaries A West Virginia Geology by map unit Quaternary Modern Reservoirs Qal Alluvium Permian or Pennsylvanian Period LTP d Dunkard Group LTP c Conemaugh Group LTP m Monongahela Group 0 25 50 MILES LTP a Allegheny Formation PENNSYLVANIA LTP pv Pottsville Group 0 25 50 KILOMETERS LTP k Kanawha Formation 40° LTP nr New River Formation LTP p Pocahontas Formation Mississippian Period Mmc Mauch Chunk Group Mbp Bluestone and Princeton Formations Ce Obrr Omc Mh Hinton Formation Obps Dmn Bluefield Formation Dbh Otbr Mbf MARYLAND LTP pv Osp Mg Greenbrier Group Smc Axis of Obs Mmp Maccrady and Pocono, undivided Burning Springs LTP a Mmc St Ce Mmcc Maccrady Formation anticline LTP d Om Dh Cwy Mp Pocono Group Qal Dhs Ch Devonian Period Mp Dohl LTP c Dmu Middle and Upper Devonian, undivided Obps Cw Dhs Hampshire Formation LTP m Dmn OHIO Ct Dch Chemung Group Omc Obs Dch Dbh Dbh Brailler and Harrell, undivided Stw Cwy LTP pv Ca Db Brallier Formation Obrr Cc 39° CPCc Dh Harrell Shale St Dmb Millboro Shale Mmc Dhs Dmt Mahantango Formation Do LTP d Ojo Dm Marcellus Formation Dmn Onondaga Group Om Lower Devonian, undivided LTP k Dhl Dohl Do Oriskany Sandstone Dmt Ot Dhl Helderberg Group LTP m VIRGINIA Qal Obr Silurian Period Dch Smc Om Stw Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations LTP c Dmb Sct Lower Silurian, undivided LTP a Smc McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Dhl Stw Ojo Mbf Db St Tuscarora Sandstone Ordovician Period Ojo Juniata and Oswego Formations Dohl Mg Om Martinsburg Formation LTP nr Otbr Ordovician--Trenton and Black River, undivided 38° Mmcc Ot Trenton Group LTP k WEST VIRGINIA Obr Black River Group Omc Ordovician, middle calcareous units Mp Db Osp St.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Gambrill State Park
    Introduction A West Gambrill State Park is located along the eastern edge of the Blue Ridge b Physiographic Province. The Blue Ridge Mountains stretch from northern Georgia to southern Pennsylvania. The Blue Ridge is made up of folded Eas x t rocks that are broken in places by faults. In Maryland, the Blue Ridge b consists of two separate ridges-Catoctin Mountain, locally known as A B C Braddock Mountain on the east, and South Mountain to the west. The Blue Figure 1. Rocks of Gambrill State Park. A, Catoctin Formation. Green- Ridge is bordered on the east by the Piedmont Physiographic Province. The ish metamorphosed basalts. B, Loudoun Formation. Volcanic ash Piedmont is underlain by metamorphic rocks that were formed when the containing pebbles of lava (at A). C, Weverton Formation. Cross- 9 W Appalachian Mountains were uplifted more than 250 million years ago bedded sandstone (b=bedding, x=cross-bedding) . ever C ton Form (hereafter Ma). What we see from Catoctin Mountain today is the result of to weathering and erosion. As a result of this durability, the Weverton ation millions of years of erosion of those mountains. Formation represents the main ridge-forming layer on both Catoctin and Bedrock Layers South mountains of the Blue Ridge of Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania. Nearly all of the rocks present in the park are assignable to three These ridges are erosional features left standing high after the softer or more geologic rock units, called formations. These are the Catoctin, the Loudoun, soluble rocks on either side were worn down by weathering and erosion.
    [Show full text]