Potato Production Support and Research to Improve Food Security in Khatlon, Tajikistan—Phase Ii

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Potato Production Support and Research to Improve Food Security in Khatlon, Tajikistan—Phase Ii POTATO PRODUCTION SUPPORT AND RESEARCH TO IMPROVE FOOD SECURITY IN KHATLON, TAJIKISTAN—PHASE II Final Technical Report 1 October 2016–30 September 2019 POTATO PRODUCTION SUPPORT AND RESEARCH TO IMPROVE FOOD SECURITY IN KHATLON, TAJIKISTAN— Phase II FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT 1 October 2016–30 September 2019 24 December 2019 DISCLAIMER This project was made possible through support provided by Feed the Future through the U.S. Agency for International Development, under the terms of Contract No. 14/ID: 1292-USAID. The opinions expressed herein are those of the International Potato Center and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Contract No.: 14/ID: 1292-USAID Principal Author: Rusudan Mdivani Project Name: Feed the Future Tajikistan: Potato production support and research to improve food security in Khatlon, Tajikistan—Phase II Reporting Period: 1 October 2016–30 September 2019 Funding Amount: $389,504 Project Duration: 3 years Contact Information International Potato Center–Central Asia and the Caucuses 6 Marshal Gelovani Ave. 0159 Tbilisi, Georgia +995 5 99 199 728 https://pspsr.cipotato.org/ CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT PARTNERS .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 PROJECT COMPONENTS ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 PROJECT ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.5 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS ACCORDING TO ACTIVITIES .......................................................................................................... 2 1.5.1 OFSP ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 1.5.2 Potato ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.5.3 Storage ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5.4 Trainings and events ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5.5 New varieties .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.5.6 Promotion................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. IMPROVED POTATO AND SWEETPOTATO PRODUCTION .................................................................................... 4 2.1 INTRODUCING BETA-CAROTENE–RICH SWEETPOTATO CLONES ................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Impact of CIP’s OFSP .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 INCREASING EFFICIENCY OF POTATO PRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 9 2.2.1 Potato production from newly harvested seeds in second season ................................................................................................... 10 2.2.2 Early potato production ............................................................................................................................................................ 12 2.2.3 Impact of CIP varieties and CIP technologies ........................................................................................................................... 14 3. CAPACITY BUILDING ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 WORKSHOPS ............................................................................................................................................................................. 14 3.2 FESTIVAL CELEBRATES OFSP ............................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 SCHOOLCHILDREN LEARN ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF SWEETPOTATO ......................................................................... 15 3.3 COOKING QUALITY TESTING ............................................................................................................................................... 16 3.4 TRAINING FARMERS ................................................................................................................................................................ 17 3.5 SUCCESS STORY ........................................................................................................................................................................ 19 4. PARTNERS AND COLLABORATION .................................................................................................................................. 20 4.1 UCA ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.2 IBPPG ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.3 OTHER PARTNERS—CHEMONICS (TAWA) AND INTRAHEALTH (THAN) ................................................................. 20 5. MANAGEMENT PLAN .............................................................................................................................................................. 20 6. PROJECT BUDGET ..................................................................................................................................................................... 22 7. LESSONS LEARNED .................................................................................................................................................................. 22 ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 24 ANNEX 1: SWEETPOTATO HORNWORM ........................................................................................................................................ 24 ANNEX 2: CIP CLONES SELECTED FOR REGISTRATION ........................................................................................................... 25 Potato production support and research to improve food security in Khatlon, Tajikistan—Phase II Final Technical Report i List of Photos Photo 1. OFSP germplasm, and two OFSP varieties, introduced into Tajikistan. ....................................................................... 4 Photo 2. OFSP roots producing vines at IBPPG............................................................................................................................... 5 Photo 3. An OFSP farmer field nursery, Khatlon. ............................................................................................................................ 6 Photo 4. OFSP vine production farm, Khatlon. ................................................................................................................................ 6 Photo 5. One of the 34 OFSP production farms established in Khatlon province. .................................................................... 6 Photo 6. OFSP nutritious gardens in schools, Khatlon. ................................................................................................................... 7 Photo 7. CIP-720189 (Pukara-Inia) ‘Surkhob’. ................................................................................................................................... 9 Photo 8. CIP-720148 ‘Durakshon’. ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Photo 9. Insect-proof nets installed on potato yield. ....................................................................................................................... 11 Photo 10. Potato field after frost. ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 Photo 11. Early potato production farmer in Khatlon. .................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Pdf | 336.56 Kb
    RAPID EMERGENCY ASSESSMENT AND COORDINATION TEAM (REACT) Floods in Khatlon: 7 – 13 May 2021 Situation Report # 1 (as of 14 May 2021) Highlights - Over 12 mudflows and landslides have been reported during the period of 7 – 13 May 2021. - Mudflows caused the death of 9 people. - Over 70 households are left homeless. - Large number of cattle has been lost and agricultural crops destroyed. - Mudflows caused disruptions to the livelihoods of around 22,000 people Situation Overview The torrential rains of 7 – 12 May 2021 triggered floods, landslides and mudflows in many of the country’s districts. The largest number of losses and destructions are faced by districts and cities of Khatlon province. Disasters affected following cities and districts: Kulob city and districts of Shamsiddini Shohin, Qushoniyon, Dangara, Yovon, Khuroson, Dusti, Vaksh, Muminobod and Jomi (please refer to Map below). CoES reports that disasters caused the death 9 people. Very preliminary estimates indicate that 74 households were left homeless and houses of another 270 households were damaged to different extent. Very modest estimations indicate damages caused by disasters to private and social infrastructure caused disruptions to the livelihoods of around 22,000 people. Government of Tajikistan activated an Inter-Agency Commission on Emergency Situations (Commission) in each disaster affected district, which fully facilitates the response operations. Furthermore, Emergency Operations Centers (Shtab) have been set up in each disaster affected district, which collects and analyzes relevant information and coordinates the response activities. Up to date, general response actions in every district include: search and rescue, evacuation of population from risk zones, constant disinfection of the affected territories, debris removal, assessment of damages and needs, registration of affected population, restoration of communal services, collection and distribution of immediate relief assistance, as well as recovery planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Environmental Examination
    INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION ADB LOAN L3451 / GRANT 0509 / GRANT 0510 REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN: CENTRAL ASIA REGIONAL ECONOMIC COOPERATION (CAREC): CORRIDORS 2, 5, AND 6 (DUSHANBE - KURGONTEPPA ROAD PROJECT) - PHASE 1 (KM 0+275-33+475) Preparation of Road Network Sustainability Project in the Republic of Tajikistan Bokhtar – Dangara Road Rehabilitation Section Prepared by the KOCKS Consult GmbH for Ministry of Transport of Tajikistan and Ministry of Transport. The IEE is a document of the Borrower. This initial environmental examination report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. August 2020 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 5 I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 12 A. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ........................... 12 B. PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION ......................... 15 II. LEGAL, POLICY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK .................................. 19 A. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: PAD3028 INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED GRANT Public Disclosure Authorized IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 41.80 MILLION (US$ 58 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN FOR A Public Disclosure Authorized RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION PROJECT February 4, 2019 Water Global Practice Europe And Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective December 31, 2018) Currency Unit = SDR 0.719 = US$1 US$ 1.391 = SDR 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 Regional Vice President: Cyril E Muller Country Director: Lilia Burunciuc Senior Global Practice Director: Jennifer Sara Practice Manager: David Michaud Task Team Leader(s): Sana Kh.H. Agha Al Nimer, Farzona Mukhitdinova ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB Asian Development Bank AF Additional Financing APA Alternate Procurement Arrangements CERC Contingent Emergency Response Component CPF Country Partnership Strategy CSC Community Scorecard DA Designated Account DFIL Disbursement and Financial Information Letter EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESMPs Environmental and Social Management Plans FCV Fragility, Conflict and Violence FI Financial Intermediaries FM Financial Management
    [Show full text]
  • Tajikistan: Rural Residents Complain About Poor Conditions of the Healthcare Centers (Photoreport)
    Tajikistan: Rural Residents Complain About Poor Conditions of the Healthcare Centers (Photoreport) Healthcare centers in rural areas of Tajikistan are in disrepair, crumbled or unsuitable for receiving patients, and remain one of the acute problems. Follow us on LinkedIn The authorities claim that almost all healthcare centers (previously they were called ‘rural outpatient clinics’ – Ed.) are restored or renovated, but residents of remote villages and doctors who work there complain about various difficulties in healthcare. Khatlon Region: Healthcare Centers Are Crumbling Lolazor-2 village of Mashal jamoat is located 50 kilometers from the regional center of Vakhsh district (108 km south of Dushanbe). For more than 20 years, its residents were not able to obtain a good health center. About 70 families live in this village. Gulmahmad Kishvarov, the village doctor, told CABAR.asia that it is very difficult to see patients in the current conditions in which he works. Tajikistan: Rural Residents Complain About Poor Conditions of the Healthcare Centers (Photoreport) The healthcare center of Lolazor-2 village of Vakhsh district is located in the cargo container. Photo: CABAR.asia “There is no medical center in the village, I work in a cargo container. Imagine the conditions inside. The patient comes; he has nowhere to lie down, it is impossible to put a drip. It is cold in winter, hot in summer. Of course, I will do my job in any case, but I would like the conditions to be better,” says Gulmahmad Kishvarov. According to him, the villagers addressed the authorities requesting to build a new healthcare center for them, but so far, there is no reply.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Political Change in Tajikistan
    Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades des Doktors der Philosophie Dissertation for the Obtainment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Universität Hamburg Fachbereich Sozialwissenschaften Institut für Politikwissenschaft University of Hamburg Faculty of Social Sciences Institute for Political Science Socio-Political Change in Tajikistan The Development Process, its Challenges Since the Civil War and the Silence Before the New Storm? By Gunda Wiegmann Primary Reviewer: Prof. Rainer Tetzlaff Secondary Reviewer: Prof. Frank Bliss Date of Disputation: 15. July 2009 1 Abstract The aim of my study was to look at governance and the extent of its functions at the local level in a post-conflict state such as Tajikistan, where the state does not have full control over the governance process, particularly regarding the provision of public goods and services. What is the impact on the development process at the local level? My dependent variable was the slowed down and regionally very much varying development process at the local level. My independent variable were the modes of local governance that emerged as an answer to the deficiencies of the state in terms of providing public goods and services at the local level which led to a reduced role of the state (my intervening variable). Central theoretic concepts in my study were governance – the processes, mechanisms and actors involved in decision-making –, local government – the representation of the state at the local level –, local governance – the processes, mechanisms and actors involved in decision- making at the local level and institutions – the formal and informal rules of the game. In the course of my field research which I conducted in Tajikistan in the years 2003/2004 and in 2005 I found that the state does not provide public goods and services to the local population in a sufficient way.
    [Show full text]
  • Feed the Future Tajikistan Health and Nutrition Activity
    FEED THE FUTURE TAJIKISTAN HEALTH AND NUTRITION ACTIVITY Annual Progress Report October 2017 to September 2018 Submitted October 30, 2018 Table of contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................ 4 Activity Implementation Summary ....................................................................... 5 IR 1: IMPROVED QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES FOR MNCH ...................... 7 Outcome 1.1: Improved quality of health care services being provided in the FTF ZOI ................ 7 Outcome 1.2: Improved patient access to health care services in the FTF ZOI due to improved quality .................................................................................................... 14 Outcome 1.3: Stronger facility and provider networks ................................................................ 18 1.3.1. Hospital-level activities .................................................................................................................. 18 1.3.2. Primary health care activities ......................................................................................................... 19 IR 2: INCREASED ACCESS TO A DIVERSE SET OF NUTRIENT-RICH FOODS ............ 20 Outcome 2.1: Diversified food consumption during the growing season and beyond ............... 20 Outcome 2.2: Nutrition integrated into agriculture-focused programs and linked to value chains supported through FTF activities ....................................................... 23 IR 3: INCREASED PRACTICE
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Entrepreneurship for Empowerment Project Tajikistan
    Women’s Entrepreneurship for Empowerment Project Tajikistan ANNUAL REPORT: October 1, 2014 – September 30, 2015 Originally Submitted: October 28, 2015 Revised and Resubmitted: April 30, 2016 THIS ANNUAL REPORT IS MADE POSSIBLE BY THE SUPPORT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THROUGH THE UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (USAID). THE CONTENTS ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF NABWT AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF USAID OR THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT. Women’s Entrepreneurship for Empowerment TAJIKISTAN ANNUAL REPORT: October 1, 2014 – September 30, 2015 Activity Title: Women’s Entrepreneurship for Empowerment, Tajikistan Agreement Officer: Kerry West Agreement Officer’s Representative: Mukhiddin Nurmatov Project Manager : Farrukh Shoimardonov Sponsoring USAID Office: Economic Development Office Agreement Number: AID-176-A-14-00006 Award Period: October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2017 Contractor: NABWT ( National Association of Business Women of Tajikistan ) Original Date of Publication: October 28, 2015 Revised and Resubmitted: April 30, 2016 Author: Farrukh Shoimardonov THE AUTHORS’ VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THIS PUBLICATION DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT OR THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Page 2 of 106 Annual Report Year 1 - Women’s Entrepreneurship for Empowerment, Tajikistan implemented by NABWT ( The National Association of Business Women of Tajikistan ) Report Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wfp255696.Pdf
    Summary of Findings, Methods, and Next Steps Key Findings and Issues Overall, the food security situation was analyzed in 13 livelihood zones for September–December 2012. About 870,277 people in 12 livelihood zones is classified in Phase 3- Crisis. Another 2,381,754 people are classified in Phase 2- Stressed and 2,055,402 in Phase 1- Minimal. In general, the food security status of analyzed zones has relatively improved in the reporting months compared to the previous year thanks to increased remittances received, good rainfall and good cereal production reaching 1.2 million tons, by end 2012, by 12 percent higher than in last season. The availability of water and pasture has also increased in some parts of the country, leading to improvement in livestock productivity and value. Remittances also played a major role in many household’ livelihoods and became the main source of income to meet their daily basic needs. The inflow of remittances in 2012 peaked at more than 3.5 billion USD, surpassing the 2011 record of 3.0 billion USD and accounting for almost half of the country’s GDP. Despite above facts that led to recovery from last year’s prolong and extreme cold and in improvement of overall situation, the food insecure are not able to benefit from it due to low purchasing capacity, fewer harvest and low livestock asset holding. Several shocks, particularly high food fuel prices, lack of drinking and irrigation water in many areas, unavailability or high cost of fertilizers, and animal diseases, have contributed to acute food insecurity (stressed or crisis) for thousands of people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fault Lines of Violent Conflict in Tajikistan
    The Fault Lines of Violent Conflict in Tajikistan A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University. August 2011 Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies (The Middle East and Central Asia) College of Arts and Social Sciences The Australian National University Christian Mark Bleuer 2 Declaration Except where otherwise acknowledged in the text, this thesis is based upon my own original research. The work contained in this thesis has not been submitted for a higher degree to any other university or institute. _________________________ 12 August 2011 3 Acknowledgements First of all I would like to thank my dissertation committee: Professor Amin Saikal, Dr. Kirill Nourzhanov and Dr. Robert L. Canfield. I am extremely grateful to have had the benefit of this high level of expertise on Central Asia while a PhD candidate at The Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies (The Middle East and Central Asia). Professor Saikal provided the firm guidance that kept me on track and reasonably on time with my work. His knowledge of Central Asian culture, history and politics was invaluable. Dr. Nourzhanov’s deep understanding of Tajikistan and Central Asia is what allowed me to produce this dissertation. He never failed to guide me towards the best sources, and the feedback he provided on my numerous drafts enabled me to vastly improve on the work that I had produced. I am also very grateful to Dr. Canfield who, despite being far away at Washington University in St. Louis, graciously agreed to be on my dissertation committee. His comments and criticism were valuable in refining my dissertation into the state that it is now in.
    [Show full text]
  • Landslide in Toshbulok & Buvak Villages, Kharangon Area, Varzob, April 2004
    Rapid Emergency Assessment & Coordination Team | Tajikistan REACT Floods in Kulyab City and Surrounding Districts, Khatlon Province GLIDE Number: FL-2010-000087-TJK Situation Report № 12 – 16 June 2010 Past reports and additional information can be found at http://www.untj.org/?c=7&id=318. Situation Overview Kulob city The first newly constructed and furnished houses for flood survivors were handed over to the new owners on the 13 June 2010 during the visit of the President of Tajikistan. Construction of a planned 572 houses for flood affected families is underway in the five of the eight allocated areas. According to information from CoES the total land allocated for new house construction in Kulob city is 221.12 hectares in eight areas, with 192 hectares available in the five areas where construction has already begun. Constructed house for floods affected family in new allocated area, Kulyab City According to the information received from the Regional REACT in Kulob, the Sultanate of Oman is funding construction of 50 houses, one medical point, one school and one mosque in 6th area allocated for housing. At present, the Government of Tajikistan (GoT) has established a fire safety point and a tent for police to ensure the security of the 6th area. A survey to determine the housing plots in the 6th area is being undertaken by the Committee of Land Management. The existing water supply system has been rehabilitated and currently provides drinking water for displaced families in the 3rd area of the new shelter site. Over 90 pieces of heavy construction equipment have been mobilized by the GoT to the housing site to support construction works.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Migration from Tajikistan
    International Organization for Migration in Cooperation with the Sharq Scientific Research Center LABOUR MIGRATION FROM TAJIKISTAN July 2003 Saodat Olimova Igor Bosc 1 The Geneva-based International Organization for Migration (IOM) is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental body, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration, advance understanding of migration issues, encourage social and economic development through migration, and work towards effective respect of the human dignity and well- being of migrants. This publication has been made possible through funding by IOM in cooperation with the Delegation of the European Commission in Kazakhstan accredited to Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan and the United States Department of State. Published by: Mission of the International Organization for Migration 5, Zakarie Rozi str. Dushanbe, 734003 Republic of Tajikistan Tel.: +992 372. 21 03 02 Fax: +992 372. 51 00 62 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 92-9068-163-2 © 2003 International Organization for Migration (IOM) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. The views expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of IOM or the Delegation of the European Commission in Kazakhstan accredited to Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan and the United States Department of State. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to express their deep appreciation for the assistance provided by Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN CASA 1000 COMMUNITY SUPPORT PROJECT (CSP) Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized December 13, 2018 Public Disclosure Authorized 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Abbreviations & Acronyms ......................................................................................................3 Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................4 I. Project Context .........................................................................................................................8 II. Project Description ...................................................................................................................9 III. Policy and Regulatory Framework .........................................................................................12 3.1. National Legal Framework for Environmental Protection and Assessment ........................................................ 12 3.1.1. Relevant National Laws and Regulations and International Treaties 12 3.1.2. National Laws and Regulations on Environmental Protection 12 3.1.3. National Legislation and International Conventions Pertaining to Forced Child and Adult Labor 17 3.2. World Bank Environmental Assessment Requirements ...................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.3 Comparison of National and World Bank EA requirements .................. Error! Bookmark
    [Show full text]