DOCSLIB.ORG

European Red List of Bees

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Red List of Bees European Red List of Bees Ana Nieto, Stuart P.M. Roberts, James Kemp, Pierre Rasmont, Michael Kuhlmann, Mariana García Criado, Jacobus C. Biesmeijer, Petr Bogusch, Holger H. Dathe, Pilar De la Rúa, Thibaut De Meulemeester, Manuel Dehon, Alexandre Dewulf, Francisco Javier Ortiz-Sánchez, Patrick Lhomme, Alain Pauly, Simon G. Potts, Christophe Praz, Marino Quaranta, Vladimir G. Radchenko, Erwin Scheuchl, Jan Smit, Jakub Straka, Michael Terzo, Bogdan Tomozii, Jemma Window and Denis Michez European Red List of Bees Ana Nieto, Stuart P.M. Roberts, James Kemp, Pierre Rasmont, Michael Kuhlmann, Mariana García Criado, Jacobus C. Biesmeijer, Petr Bogusch, Holger H. Dathe, Pilar De la Rúa, Thibaut De Meulemeester, Manuel Dehon, Alexandre Dewulf, Francisco Javier Ortiz-Sánchez, Patrick Lhomme, Alain Pauly, Simon G. Potts, Christophe Praz, Marino Quaranta, Vladimir G. Radchenko, Erwin Scheuchl, Jan Smit, Jakub Straka, Michael Terzo, Bogdan Tomozii, Jemma Window and Denis Michez IUCN Global Species Programme IUCN European Union Representative Office Published by the European Commission This publication has been prepared by IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Commission or IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission or IUCN. Citation: Nieto, A., Roberts, S.P.M., Kemp, J., Rasmont, P., Kuhlmann, M., García Criado, M., Biesmeijer, J.C., Bogusch, P., Dathe, H.H., De la Rúa, P., De Meulemeester, T., Dehon, M., Dewulf, A., Ortiz-Sánchez, F.J., Lhomme, P., Pauly, A., Potts, S.G., Praz, C., Quaranta, M., Radchenko, V.G., Scheuchl, E., Smit, J., Straka, J., Terzo, M., Tomozii, B., Window, J. and Michez, D. 2014. European Red List of bees. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. Design and layout: Imre Sebestyén jr. / UNITgraphics.com Printed by: Rosseels Printing Picture credits on cover page: Trachusa interrupta (Endangered) © P. Niolu. All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder (see individual captions for details). Photographs should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without written permission from the copyright holder. Available from: Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, http://bookshop.europa.eu IUCN Publications Services, www.iucn.org/publications A catalogue of IUCN publications is also available. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014 ISBN: 978-92-79-44512-5 DOI: 10.2779/77003 © European Union, 2014 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Printed in Belgium The text of this book is printed on 130 gsm 100% recycled paper (CyclusPrint, FSC and EU Ecolabel certified) Table of contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................... v Executive summary ................................................................................................................................................ viii 1. Background ..........................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 The European context ..................................................................................................................................1 1.2 European bees: diversity and endemism .......................................................................................................2 1.3 Bee ecology ..................................................................................................................................................3 1.4 Importance of bees in pollination.................................................................................................................6 1.5 Assessment of species extinction risk ...........................................................................................................6 1.6 Objectives of the assessment.........................................................................................................................7 2. Assessment methodology ......................................................................................................................................8 2.1 Geographic scope .........................................................................................................................................8 2.2 Taxonomic scope ........................................................................................................................................8 2.3 Assessment protocol .....................................................................................................................................8 2.4. Species mapping .........................................................................................................................................8 3. Results .................................................................................................................................................................10 3.1 Threat status ..............................................................................................................................................10 3.2 Status by taxonomic group ........................................................................................................................13 3.3 Spatial distribution of species .....................................................................................................................18 3.4 Major threats to bees in Europe ................................................................................................................21 3.5 Population trends .......................................................................................................................................23 3.6 Gaps in knowledge ....................................................................................................................................25 4. Conservation measures .......................................................................................................................................26 4.1 Biodiversity protection in Europe and the EU ............................................................................................26 4.2 Conservation of bee species in the EU ......................................................................................................26 4.3 Conservation of bee species at the national level.........................................................................................27 4.4 Extinction risk versus conservation status ...................................................................................................28 4.5 Red List versus priority for conservation action ..........................................................................................29 5. Recommendations .............................................................................................................................................30 5.1 Policy recommendations ............................................................................................................................30 5.2 Application of project outputs ..................................................................................................................31 5.3 Future work ..............................................................................................................................................31 References ...............................................................................................................................................................33 Appendix 1. Red List status of European bees .......................................................................................................42 Appendix 2. Example of species summary and distribution map .........................................................................78 iii Foreword Europe’s landscape has In recent years, the decline of pollinators has garnered been shaped by centuries increased public attention. Indeed, insect pollination, of diverse farming and which is currently under threat in Europe, has an estimated forestry traditions. This economic value of €15 billion per year in the EU alone. has resulted in a wide Unfortunately,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cavity-Nest Boxes for Solitary Bees: a Century of Design and Research J
    Cavity-nest boxes for solitary bees: a century of design and research J. Scott Macivor To cite this version: J. Scott Macivor. Cavity-nest boxes for solitary bees: a century of design and research. Apidologie, 2017, 48 (3), pp.311-327. 10.1007/s13592-016-0477-z. hal-02973424 HAL Id: hal-02973424 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02973424 Submitted on 21 Oct 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie (2017) 48:311–327 Review article * INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France, 2016 DOI: 10.1007/s13592-016-0477-z Cavity-nest boxes for solitary bees: a century of design and research J. Scott MACIVOR Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ON M1C 1A5, Canada Received 25 May 2016 – Revised 3 September 2016 – Accepted 26 September 2016 Abstract – A variety of solitary bee species that naturally nest in wood and plant stems aboveground also readily accept nest boxes, which are human-made devices that aggregate these nesting conditions. Nest boxes are sheltered bundles of hollow plant stems, bamboo or reeds, and holes drilled into wood or cavities made of other materials such as glass or polystyrene.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of READING Delivering Biodiversity and Pollination Services on Farmland
    UNIVERSITY OF READING Delivering biodiversity and pollination services on farmland: a comparison of three wildlife- friendly farming schemes Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Agri-Environmental Research School of Agriculture, Policy and Development Chloe J. Hardman June 2016 Declaration I confirm that this is my own work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. Chloe Hardman i Abstract Gains in food production through agricultural intensification have come at an environmental cost, including reductions in habitat diversity, species diversity and some ecosystem services. Wildlife- friendly farming schemes aim to mitigate the negative impacts of agricultural intensification. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of three schemes using four matched triplets of farms in southern England. The schemes were: i) a baseline of Entry Level Stewardship (ELS: a flexible widespread government scheme, ii) organic agriculture and iii) Conservation Grade (CG: a prescriptive, non-organic, biodiversity-focused scheme). We examined how effective the schemes were in supporting habitat diversity, species diversity, floral resources, pollinators and pollination services. Farms in CG and organic schemes supported higher habitat diversity than farms only in ELS. Plant and butterfly species richness were significantly higher on organic farms and butterfly species richness was marginally higher on CG farms compared to farms in ELS. The species richness of plants, butterflies, solitary bees and birds in winter was significantly correlated with local habitat diversity. Organic farms supported more evenly distributed floral resources and higher nectar densities compared to farms in CG or ELS. Compared to maximum estimates of pollen demand from six bee species, only organic farms supplied sufficient pollen in late summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Tayside Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2Nd Edition 2016-2026
    Tayside Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2nd Edition 2016­2026 Incorporating the local authority areas of Angus and Perth & Kinross Every Action Counts! Scottish Wildcat © Scottish Wildcat Action 2 Chairman’s Message Anyone glancing at this latest Biodiversity Action Plan for Tayside could be forgiven for feeling a little daunted at the scale of the tasks identified in the Actions. Indeed, the scale of what we need to do over the years ahead is large if we are to pass on to our future generations a land that is as rich and varied in all its forms of life as the one that we have inherited. The hope that we can rise to this challenge comes from the sheer goodwill of so many people and organisations willing to give their time and effort to look after our wildlife, whether it be found in the remoter hills or closer to home in our towns and villages. Great examples of what can be achieved when we work together with a little direction and thought applied can be found throughout the following pages. This Action Plan arrives at a time of great uncertainty, particularly in rural areas which have been so dependent on public funding for so much of our land use. Following the Brexit vote, we have to take the view that this must be an opportunity to improve on our delivery of so many of the tasks identified in this Plan and others which, if achieved, will improve the life of all of us along with all the many forms of life that we share this country with.
    [Show full text]
  • SLAM Project
    Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e69924 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e69924 Data Paper SLAM Project - Long Term Ecological Study of the Impacts of Climate Change in the natural forest of Azores: I - the spiders from native forests of Terceira and Pico Islands (2012-2019) Ricardo Costa‡, Paulo A. V. Borges‡,§ ‡ cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes / Azorean Biodiversity Group and Universidade dos Açores, Rua Capitão João d’Ávila, São Pedro, 9700-042, Angra do Heroismo, Azores, Portugal § IUCN SSC Mid-Atlantic Islands Specialist Group,, Angra do Heroísmo, Azores, Portugal Corresponding author: Paulo A. V. Borges ([email protected]) Academic editor: Pedro Cardoso Received: 09 Jun 2021 | Accepted: 05 Jul 2021 | Published: 01 Sep 2021 Citation: Costa R, Borges PAV (2021) SLAM Project - Long Term Ecological Study of the Impacts of Climate Change in the natural forest of Azores: I - the spiders from native forests of Terceira and Pico Islands (2012-2019). Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e69924. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e69924 Abstract Background Long-term monitoring of invertebrate communities is needed to understand the impact of key biodiversity erosion drivers (e.g. habitat fragmentation and degradation, invasive species, pollution, climatic changes) on the biodiversity of these high diverse organisms. The data we present are part of the long-term project SLAM (Long Term Ecological Study of the Impacts of Climate Change in the natural forest of Azores) that started in 2012, aiming to understand the impact of biodiversity erosion drivers on Azorean native forests (Azores, Macaronesia, Portugal). In this contribution, the design of the project, its objectives and the first available data for the spider fauna of two Islands (Pico and Terceira) are described.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Resource Choice of Flower-Visiting Insects in Relation to Pollen Nutritional Quality and Land Use
    Diversity and resource choice of flower-visiting insects in relation to pollen nutritional quality and land use Diversität und Ressourcennutzung Blüten besuchender Insekten in Abhängigkeit von Pollenqualität und Landnutzung Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Technischen Universität Darmstadt zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doctor rerum naturalium genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl. Biologin Christiane Natalie Weiner aus Köln Berichterstatter (1. Referent): Prof. Dr. Nico Blüthgen Mitberichterstatter (2. Referent): Prof. Dr. Andreas Jürgens Tag der Einreichung: 26.02.2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29.04.2016 Darmstadt 2016 D17 2 Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit entsprechend den Regeln guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis selbständig und ohne unzulässige Hilfe Dritter angefertigt habe. Sämtliche aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Gedanken sowie sämtliche von Anderen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Daten, Techniken und Materialien sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher keiner anderen Hochschule zu Prüfungszwecken eingereicht. Osterholz-Scharmbeck, den 24.02.2016 3 4 My doctoral thesis is based on the following manuscripts: Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2011): Land-use intensity in grasslands: changes in biodiversity, species composition and specialization in flower-visitor networks. Basic and Applied Ecology 12 (4), 292-299. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2014): Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines. Ecology 95, 466–474. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M , Blüthgen, N. (in prep.): Land-use intensification triggers diversity loss in pollination networks: Regional distinctions between three different German bioregions Weiner, C.N., Hilpert, A., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Flower Preferences and Pollen Transport Networks for Cavity‐Nesting Solitary Bees: Implications for the Design of Agri‐Envir
    Received: 14 February 2018 | Revised: 22 April 2018 | Accepted: 23 April 2018 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4234 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Flower preferences and pollen transport networks for cavity- nesting solitary bees: Implications for the design of agri- environment schemes Catherine E. A. Gresty1 | Elizabeth Clare2 | Dion S. Devey3 | Robyn S. Cowan3 | Laszlo Csiba3 | Panagiota Malakasi3 | Owen T. Lewis1 | Katherine J. Willis1,3 1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Abstract 2School of Biological and Chemical Floral foraging resources are valuable for pollinator conservation on farmland, and Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, their provision is encouraged by agri- environment schemes in many countries. Across London, UK Europe, wildflower seed mixtures are widely sown on farmland to encourage pollina- 3Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK tors, but the extent to which key pollinator groups such as solitary bees exploit and Correspondence benefit from these resources is unclear. We used high- throughput sequencing of 164 Catherine E. A. Gresty, Department of Zoology, New Radcliffe House, Radcliffe pollen samples extracted from the brood cells of six common cavity- nesting solitary Observatory Quarter, 6GG, Woodstock Rd, bee species (Osmia bicornis, Osmia caerulescens, Megachile versicolor, Megachile Oxford OX2, UK. Email: [email protected] ligniseca, Megachile centuncularis and Hylaeus confusus) which are widely distributed across the UK and Europe. We documented their pollen use across 19 farms in south- ern England, UK, revealing their forage plants and examining the structure of their pollen transport networks. Of the 32 plant species included currently in sown wild- flower mixes, 15 were recorded as present within close foraging range of the bees on the study farms, but only Ranunculus acris L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bees of Sub-Saharan Africa
    A-PDF Split DEMO : Purchase from www.A-PDF.com to remove the watermark Genus Nasutapis Michener (Fig. 36E) Nasutapis has a distinct projection medioventrally on the clypeus. This genus is monotypic (Nasutapis straussorum Michener) and endemic to KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, and found in nests of Braunsapis facialis (Gerstaecker). 8.6.2. Subfamily Nomadinae In sub-Saharan Africa the Nomadinae comprises four tribes and six genera. They are all cleptoparasitic. Diagnostic features for the subfamily are difficult to define, but almost each tribe has a distinctive feature, except Ammobatoidini. 8.6.2.1. Tribe Nomadini Genus Nomada Scopoli (Fig. 37A) Nomadini has one genus in sub-Saharan Africa, namely Nomada. There are ten species, occurring mostly in North-East and southern Africa. 8.6.2.2. Tribe Epeolini Genus Epeolus Latreille (Fig. 37B) Epeolini has one genus in sub-Saharan Africa, namely Epeolus. There are 13 species that occur mostly on the east side of the continent, along its entire length. 8.6.2.3. Tribe Ammobatoidini Genus Ammobatoides Radoszkowski (Fig. 37C) Ammobatoidini has one genus in sub-Saharan Africa, and it is known only from the holotype of Ammobatoides braunsi Bischoff. It was collected in Willowmore, South Africa. It therefore goes without saying that it is extremely rare. 8.6.2.4. Tribe Ammobatini The Ammobatini has four sub-Saharan genera. They all comprise cleptoparasitic bees. Ammobates has its centre of diversity in the Palaearctic, as does Chiasmognathus, which occurs just north of the Afrotropical Region and intrudes into sub-Saharan Africa. Pasites is mostly Afrotropical and Sphecodopsis is endemic to southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Ammobatini and Revision of the Afrotropical Genera (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae: Nomadinae)
    PHYLOGENY OF THE AMMOBATINI AND REVISION OF THE AFROTROPICAL GENERA (HYMENOPTERA: ANTHOPHORIDAE: NOMADINAE) by CONNAL DESMOND EARDLEY Submitted in fulfilment of the academic requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Zoology and Entomology University of Natal Pietermaritzburg 1994 ABSTRACT The phylogeny of the Ammobatini was studied, with regard to the principles of cladistics using parsimony, and the classification is revised. It is concluded that the tribe fonns a monophyletic group that comprises six distinct monophyletic genera: Pasite Jurine, Sphecodopsis Bischoff, Ammobates Latreille, Me/anempis Saussure, Spilwpasites Warncke and Oreopasites Cockerell, of which Pasites, Sphecodopsis, Ammobates and MeLanempis occur in the Afrotropical Region. The Afrotropical species of these four genera are revised. Pseudopasites Bischoff and Pseudodichroa Bischoff are synonymized with Sphecodopsis. Pasites includes 17 Afrotropical species, Sphecodopsis 10 species, and Ammobates and MeLanempis are each known from a single Afrotropical species. Ten new species are described: Pa..~ites nilssoni, P. paulyi, P. humecta, P. glwma, P. namibiensis, P. somaLica, Sphecodopsis vespericena, S. longipygidium, S. namaquensis and Ammobates auster. Thirty-three names are synonymized: they are P. nigerrima (Friese), P. argentata (Baker) (= P. barkeri (Cockereil»; P. chubbi Cockerell, P. nigritula Bischoff, P. peratra Cockerell (= P. atra Friese); P. nigripes (Friese), P. fortis Cockerell, P. subfortis Cockerell, P. stordyi Cockerell, P. voiensis Cockerell, P. aitior Cockerell (= P. carnifex (Gerstaecker»; P. Ilataiensis (Cockerell), P. aiboguttatus (Friese), P. ogiiviei (Cockerell) (= P. jenseni (Friese»; P. alivalensis (Cockerell), P. rufitarsis (Cockerell) (= P. histrio (Gerstaecker»; P. marshaUi (Cockerell) (= P. jonesi (Cockerell»; P. abessinica (Friese), P. fulviventris (Bischoff), P. rhodesialla (Bischoff), P. apicalis (Bischoff), P.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment for the Kansan Spikerush Leafhopper (Dorydiella Kansana Beamer)
    Conservation Assessment For The Kansan spikerush leafhopper (Dorydiella kansana Beamer) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region January 11, 2005 James Bess OTIS Enterprises 13501 south 750 west Wanatah, Indiana 46390 This document is undergoing peer review, comments welcome This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service - Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 1 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY ..................................................................................... 1 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Apoidea: Andrenidae: Panurginae)
    Contemporary distributions of Panurginus species and subspecies in Europe (Apoidea: Andrenidae: Panurginae) Sébastien Patiny Abstract The largest number of Old World Panurginus Nylander, 1848 species is distributed in the West- Palaearctic. The genus is absent in Africa and rather rare in the East-Palaearctic. Warncke (1972, 1987), who is the main author treating Palaearctic Panurginae in the last decades, subdivided Panurginus into a small number of species, including two principal taxa admitting for each a very large number of subspecies: Panurginus brullei (Lepeletier, 1841) and Panurginus montanus Giraud, 1861. Following recent works, the two latter are in fact complexes of closely related species. In the West-Palaearctic context, distributions of certain species implied in these complexes appear as very singular, distinct of mostly all other Panurginae ranges and highly interesting from a fundamental point of view. Based on a cartographic approach, the causes which influence (or have conditioned, in the past) the observed ranges of these species are discussed. Key words: Panurginae, biogeography, West-Palaearctic, speciation, glaciation. Introduction 1841) sensu lato are studied in the present paper. In the Old World Panurginae fauna, Panurginus The numerous particularities of their distribu- Nylander, 1848 is one of the only two genera tions are characterized and discussed here. The (with Melitturga Latreille, 1809) which are limits of these distributions were proposed and distributed in the entire Palaearctic region. The related to the contemporary and past develop- genera Camptopoeum Spinola, 1843 and Panur- ments which could have caused these ranges. gus Panzer, 1806 are also represented in the East- Palaearctic (in northern Thailand), but too few Catalogue of the old world species data are available for these genera to make them of Panurginus the subject of particular considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthophila List
    Filename: cuic_bee_database.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Sphaeroceridae: Limosininae), an Almost Entirely
    A review of the Archiceroptera Papp genus complex (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae: Limosininae) by Steven Mark Paiero A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Sciences Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Steven Mark Paiero, December, 2017 ABSTRACT: A review of the Archiceroptera Papp genus complex (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae: Limosininae) Steven Mark Paiero Advisor: University of Guelph, 2017 Dr. S.A. Marshall This thesis has two parts. The first part investigates the relationships between the Archiceroptera genus complex and other members of the Limosininae (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae). A focus is placed on the relationships within the larger epandrial process group, which contains Bitheca, Bromeloecia, Pterogramma, Aptilotella, and Robustagramma, along with Archiceroptera, Rudolfina and several previously unplaced species groups. Molecular and morphological data sets provide the first phylogeny of the group, and were used to support the inclusion of several unplaced species groups within Rudolfina and Archiceroptera, while one new genus is described. Pectinosina gen. nov. includes two species: P. prominens (Duda), previously placed in Rudolfina, and P. carro n. sp. The second part of the thesis deals with revisions of Archiceroptera Papp and Rudolfina Roháček. Rudolfina now includes 13 described species, nine of which are newly described here (R. bucki, R. exuberata, R. howdeni, R. megepandria, R. pauca, R. pilosa, R. newtoni, R. remiforma, and R. tumida). Archiceroptera now includes 29 species, of which 27 are newly described here (A. adamas, A. addenda, A. barberi, A. basilia, A. bilobata, A. bisetosus, A. braziliensis, A. brevivilla, A. browni, A. caliga, A. calligraphia, A. cobolorum, A.
    [Show full text]