DOCSLIB.ORG

CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY in CHINA a Strategy for the Netherlands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY in CHINA a Strategy for the Netherlands University of Twente School of Management and Governance (MB) NIKOS CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY IN CHINA A strategy for the Netherlands Rik van den Berge January 2009 CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY IN CHINA A strategy for the Netherlands Master thesis Rik van den Berge S0065005 University of Twente NIKOS – International Management Program Principal Representative: A. van Pabst Project supervisor university: M.R. Stienstra MSc. Co-reader: prof. dr. ir. J.J. Krabbendam ii ABSTRACT Purpose of this research report Clean coal technologies (CCT) are technologies designed to enhance both the efficiency and the environmental impact of coal extraction, preparation and use. This report mainly focuses on clean coal technologies that are employed in the power generation and fuel-oil substitution sector. China is world’s third largest country, the second largest economy measured by purchasing power parity (after the US), the most populated country, as well as the most heavily polluted country, and the second largest energy consumer (after the US). All these elements indicate that China operates on a large scale, both in a positive and negative sense. Coal is the backbone of China’s energy system. It meets just over 60% of the country’s primary energy needs. Coal’s importance in the overall fuel mix has been growing in recent years, due to booming demand for electricity, which is almost 80% coal-generated. Since China is characterized by its striking dependence on coal, now and in the future, China is potentially the biggest market for clean coal technologies. This market is increasingly attracting international attention from countries (including The Netherlands) and organizations, some of which have already been exploring on clean coal technologies in co-operation with China for years. Design/methodology/approach This research centers around the question ‘What strategy does the Netherlands has to apply regarding the transfer of its clean coal technology to China?’. With the help of specific sub- questions, the main question is answered. Through the study of relevant theories and empirical practices, literature reading and comparisons, a case study and interviews with industry experts and industry players, this research intends to critically analyze the main opportunities in the field of CCT in China, for Dutch organizations. The specific clean coal situation for China and the Netherlands are studied with a hybrid approach that confronts macro level factors with specific factors of clean coal technologies on a micro-level. In order to get a deeper insight into the Dutch competence of one technology, CO 2 sequestration: an analytical framework is added for a future meso-level study. Findings The findings of this research indicate that the clean coal technologyand activities of the Netherlands are not well understood in China. Chinese research institutes and business organizations do not have enough knowledge about specific activities and expertise about CCT of Dutch organizations. As a result, the Netherlands should focus on specific clean coal technologies in which it could become a renowned key player, instead of covering a wide range of CCT. The first step in starting co-operation in CCT must be research. China is described as the ‘mainboard’ of clean coal technology: the most advanced technologies are being explored by China. China collects and absorbs technologies, and then develops them further. The Netherlands can tag along with these developments by putting more effort in knowledge and expertise transfer with China, for instance by setting up joint training and R&D programs and exchange of employees (engineers) and students (MSc, PhD.). The Chinese situation Future development of Clean Coal Technologies in China Short term (one year or less) Medium term (2 -10 years) Long term (10 or more years) • Coal washing • Larger scale fluidized bed • Carbon Capture and Storage • Various efficiency boilers (CCS) improvements • Supercritical boilers for coal • Small circulating fluidized fired power plants bed boilers • IGCC • Flue Gas Desulphurization • Coal liquefaction (FGD) • Coal gasification iii Opportunities By further developing knowledge and technology in the Netherlands regarding coal blending (mixing of coal for a better composition), Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC), Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), Enhanced Coal Bed Methane (ECBM), and other efficiency-based clean coal technologies, opportunities arise to support upcoming coal based economies, like China, with the development of a modern and clean energy system. When China does not set emission targets for CO 2 reduction, CCS standalone, is not very advantageous for China. Dutch activities should therefore focus among other things on Enhanced Coal Bed Methane (ECBM) in China. This technology improves the gas winning by injecting CO 2 into coal beds and pushing the methane gas out. Besides an efficiency improvement of up to 50%, application of ECBM also lowers the pressure on China’s scare gas supplies. In the beginning of July 2008, a financial support program (Asia Facility) of the Dutch government was granted to a mutual knowledge transfer program with Dutch and Chinese parties. This program is interesting in itself, but possible future spin-offs could be even more interesting. Competition and collaboration The competition on the Chinese market for clean coal technologies is high. On the one side, there is competition from giants like Japan, the US, Canada and Australia who are investing billions in Sino-research programs to position their technologies on the Chinese market. On the other side, China is developing clean coal technologies very rapidly by itself. The forms of collaboration are not limited to the Dutch border, simply because teaming up with other European organizations can drive an even stronger attempt to seize a share of the Chinese market. The Dutch focus to become a key-player in CCS can be of future importance for building a competitive advantage over other countries but also to reach its own climate targets for CO 2 reduction. Besides this, the focus on CCS fits perfectly into the European framework, especially in the European strategy for China. Attractive organizational modalities are available for Dutch organizations that intend to co-operate with China in the field of CCT. Yet a number of obstacles hinder successful technology transfer to China. Examples of these obstacles lie in the field of intellectual property rights, finance, technological capabilities, and unfavorable governmental policies. By reading this report, organizations will better understand the current situation and will be more favorably positioned to overcome potential obstacles in seizing opportunities on CCT in China. Research limitations and future research The sample contains of 11 players with very different backgrounds (energy producer, governmental organizations, research organization) this limits the generalization of the outcome. Because of the ‘snapshot’ that is taken of the clean coal technology market, no developments can be measured during the research based on own primary research data. Also the research findings are limited to the Chinese and Dutch borders and cannot be generalized for other countries that are dependent on coal as a primary resource of energy. More research is needed on all technical aspects of carbon sequestration, fundamental processes (e.g., pore behavior), leakage rates and safety, storage capacities, and measurement-monitoring- verification, as well as on policy aspects including permitting and liability. Also the Dutch competence on CO 2 sequestration needs to be analyzed further. Therefore, this research presents an analytical framework that can be used. Origin/value of this paper While current studies provide insight in clean coal technology opportunities in China on different research levels, this research provides interesting opportunities specifically for the Netherlands. The proposed approach aims to study the clean coal technology market in China at both a macro- as in a micro level and makes a connection with Dutch activities so that knowledge with regards to the Chinese and Dutch practices, opportunities and threats can be achieved by organizations, universities and businesses. iv PREFACE This report is the result of the research executed to obtain my Master of Science degree in Business Administration. This research was carried out in Enschede, Beijing and Kortenhoef. I would like to thank all the people who have invested their time, energy and haven given their support to make this research a success. I hope that this report forms a positive stimulation for future cooperation with- and clean coal technology transfer to China. Kortenhoef, January 2009. Rik van den Berge ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks goes to China Coal Information Institute (CCII) Freek Jan Frerichs - Assistant Counselor Jinyan Wu – Master mineral processing for Science and Technology Li Hongjun – Ph.D. Shell Global Solutions China University of Mining and Eur.Ing Henry K.H.Wang - GM & Principal Technology Service -Manager Clean Coal – Energy - Xie Qiang – Ph.D. Professor China Shu Xinqian – Ph.D. Professor Flora Yang – Section chief of foreign Shell Gas & Power experts co-ordination Gu Jing - Strategy and Portfolio Manager - Dr. Zhu Shuquan – Professor Clean Coal Technology EU-China Energy and Environment Shenhua Group – Coal to Oil & Chemicals Program Department Bert Bekker - EU Natural Gas Manager Gao Min – Business Manager Royal Netherlands Embassy in China Shenhua
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Roadmap for the Demonstration of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in China
    Final Report/June 2011 ADB TA‐7286 (PRC) People’s Republic of China Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Demonstration – Strategic Analysis and Capacity Strengthening Roadmap for the Demonstration of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in China Final Report June 2011 Final Report /June 2011 ADB TA‐7286 (PRC) People’s Republic of China Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Demonstration – Strategic Analysis and Capacity Strengthening Roadmap for the Demonstration of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in China Final Report June 2011 Report submitted by Project Team Prof. J. YAN – Team Leader & CCS Experts Prof. H. JIN – National Co‐leader Prof. Li Z., Dr. J. Hetland, Dr. Teng F., Prof. Jiang K.J., Ms. C. J. Vincent, Dr. A. Minchener, Prof. Zeng RS, Prof. Shen PP, Dr. X. D. Pei, Dr. Wang C., Prof. Hu J, Dr. Zhang JT The views expressed are those of the Consultants and do not necessarily reflect those of the Ministry or the Asian Development Bank (ADB). i Final Report /June 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Tables .............................................................................................................................. iv Figures ............................................................................................................................. v Key findings: .................................................................................................................... ix Main Recommendations: ................................................................................................. xi 1. Background and Objectives .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tianjin Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
    N IGCC I NJ IA T TIANJIN INTEGRATED G NEN A GASIFICATION COMBINED HU CYCLE POWER PLANT PROJECT New Power Generation Technology Syngas purification system for Near-Zero Emissions ɂ Power generation in the People’s Republic of China heavily relies on coal. In 2008, coal-based power plants produced 81% of the country’s electricity. ɂ Coal dependency results in severe environmental degradation. A third of the country suffers from acid rain due to emissions from large-scale coal production. ɂ Coal also aggravates poor air quality in most eastern and central cities, inducing public health hazards. The World Health Organization reports that air pollution contributes to 40% of deaths caused by ischemic heart disease.a ɂ With assistance from the Asian Development Bank, the government initiated the Tianjin Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Power Plant, which generates lower-cost electricity while reducing emissions from sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, mercury, and particulate matter by 95%. Such type of power plant can also provide a low-cost platform for carbon capture and storage, potentially reducing carbon emissions up to 90%. a World Health Organization. 2014. Seven million premature deaths annually linked to air pollution. 25 March. http://www.who.int/ mediacentre/news/releases/2014/air-pollution/en/ 26 CONTEXT ProJECT SNapshot oal-based energy production increased in the People’s LOAN APPROVAL DAte: Republic of China (PRC), from 0.98 billion tons in 2000 to February 2010 C2.74 billion tons in 2008. Projections suggest continuing increases as the PRC works to keep pace with an accelerating LOAN AMount: demand for energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Facing China's Coal Future
    Facing China’s Coal Future Prospects and Challenges for Carbon Capture and Storage Dennis Best and Ellina Levina The views expressed in this working paper do not necessarily reflect the views or policy of the International Energy Agency (IEA) Secretariat or of its individual member countries. This paper is a work in progress and/or is produced in parallel with or contributing to other IEA work or formal publication; comments are welcome, directed to [email protected] © OECD/IEA, 2012 ©OECD/IEA 2012 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The International Energy Agency (IEA), an autonomous agency, was established in November 1974. Its primary mandate was – and is – two-fold: to promote energy security amongst its member countries through collective response to physical disruptions in oil supply, and provide authoritative research and analysis on ways to ensure reliable, affordable and clean energy for its 28 member countries and beyond. The IEA carries out a comprehensive programme of energy co-operation among its member countries, each of which is obliged to hold oil stocks equivalent to 90 days of its net imports. The Agency’s aims include the following objectives: n Secure member countries’ access to reliable and ample supplies of all forms of energy; in particular, through maintaining effective emergency response capabilities in case of oil supply disruptions. n Promote sustainable energy policies that spur economic growth and environmental protection in a global context – particularly in terms of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions that contribute to climate change. n Improve transparency of international markets through collection and analysis of energy data. n Support global collaboration on energy technology to secure future energy supplies and mitigate their environmental impact, including through improved energy efficiency and development and deployment of low-carbon technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing China's Coal Power Emissions with CCUS
    REDUCING CHINA’S COAL POWER EMISSIONS WITH CCUS RETROFITS TOBY LOCKWOOD (IEA CLEAN COAL CENTRE) Additional contributors: Paul Baruya, IEA Clean Coal Centre Andrew Minchener, IEA Clean Coal Centre CIAB Working Group: Mick Buffier, Glencore Holly Krutka, Peabody Liam McHugh, World Coal Association Peter Morris, Minerals Council of Australia Nikki Fisher, Anglo American Skip Stephens, Komatsu Han Xu, China Energy Karl Bindemann, Coal Industry Advisory Board 2 IEA CLEAN COAL CENTR E – REDUCING CHINA’S COA L POWER EMISSIONS WI TH CCUS RETROFITS Acknowledgements: Anthony Ku, National Institute of Clean-and-Low-Carbon Energy Xu Bin, National Institute of Clean-and-Low-Carbon Energy Surinder Singh, National Institute of Clean-and-Low-Carbon Energy Zhao Rui, Shenhua Guohua (China Energy) Ma Xiangshan, Global CCS Institute (China) Liang Xi, UK-China (Guangdong) CCUS Institute Sun Rui, Electric Power Planning and Engineering Institute Li Wenkai, Electric Power Planning and Engineering Institute Gao Shiwang, Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute Yang Xiaoliang, World Resources Institute Mao Jiangxiong, Tsinghua University Pan Li, China Electricity Council David Elzinga, Asian Development Bank Li Qiming, Dunhua Oil 2 IEA CLEAN COAL CENTR E – REDUCING CHINA’S COA L POWER EMISSIONS WI TH CCUS RETROFITS PREFACE This report has been produced by the IEA Clean Coal Centre for the Coal Industry Advisory Board. It is based on a survey and analysis of published literature, and on information gathered in discussions with interested organisations and individuals. Their assistance is gratefully acknowledged. It should be understood that the views expressed in this report are our own, and are not necessarily shared by those who supplied the information, nor by our member organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Developments in China's Coal-Fired Power Sector
    Developments in China’s coal-fired power sector Andrew Minchener CCC/163 January 2010 Copyright © IEA Clean Coal Centre ISBN 978-92-9029-483-2 Abstract China’s power generation capacity has increased rapidly to support the growth of the Chinese economy, and by end of 2008 it had reached 792 GWe, which comprised some 170 GWe of hydropower, 601 GWe of thermal power (nearly 75% of the total), almost all of which is coal fired, nearly 12 GWe wind power and 9 GWe nuclear. The expectation is that the overall capacity will grow to some 1500 GWe by 2020, but with a significant introduction of zero carbon and low carbon power generation technologies, such as nuclear, wind and solar power, together with further growth in hydropower and perhaps some additional natural gas fired plants. Coal fired power generation, although it will represent a smaller proportion of the total capacity in the future, will still grow in absolute terms in China. The average efficiency of the coal fired capacity will continue to rise significantly as the Government continues to introduce very large supercritical and ultra-supercritical pulverised coal units with good environmental controls, and large state of the art circulating fluidised bed combustion units, while closing small, old and low efficiency units. This coal power plant modernisation programme has involved cooperation and extensive technology transfer via licences and joint ventures with international equipment suppliers. Chinese manufacturers are now in a position where they have advanced the technical quality of their products such that they can gain significant export opportunities, especially as their products are very cost competitive compared to OECD options.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Carbon Capture and Sequestration in China: a Global Learning Laboratory
    FEATURE ARTICLE Advancing Carbon Capture and Sequestration in China: A Global Learning Laboratory By Craig Hart and Hengwei Liu China’s dependency on coal fuels the country’s phenomenal economic growth but at a major cost to the country’s air and water quality, ultimately threatening human health and the country’s continued economic growth. The Chinese government’s efforts to put China onto a cleaner, low carbon development path have been substantial; however China’s pollution and greenhouse gas emissions continue to grow. In an attempt to develop its own advanced coal generation technologies to improve the country’s air quality and energy efficiency, the Chinese government is investing heavily in gasification and other technologies that can be employed in carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) applications. This investment has turned China into a global laboratory for CCS pilot projects, attracting foreign governments, multilateral institutions, nongovernmental organizations, and business partners. China’s leadership in developing CCS technology could ultimately help lower its costs and promote its commercialization globally, representing a major step Woodro forward to solving the global climate dilemma. China has the most coal-dependent economy plant or any industrial facility that emits it in W on earth, which has fueled the country’s high concentrations. CCS can potentially Wilson phenomenal economic growth. But this coal- make a significant contribution to lowering fueled growth has come at a major cost to air GHG emissions by permanently storing CO2 and water quality, and China is now the leading underground. i nternational Center for Center for nternational emitter of carbon dioxide (CO2).
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Near-Term Opportunities for Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) in China
    NRDC WHITE PAPER Identifying Near-Term Opportunities For Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) in China Natural Resources Defense Council December 2010 THIS NRDC WHITE PAPER IS SUBJECT TO REVISION PRIOR TO FINAL PUBLICATION Identifying Near-Term Opportunities For Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) in China December 2010 Coordinating Authors and Editors Technical Authors and Contributors Jingjing Qian Julio Friedmann George Peridas Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Jason Chen Yueming Qiu Xiaochun Li Bruce Ho Ning Wei Natural Resources Defense Council Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences S. Ming Sung Mike Fowler Clean Air Task Force Deborah Seligsohn Yue Liu Sarah Forbes World Resources Institute Dongjie Zhang China Tsinghua University Lifeng Zhao Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences About NRDC The Natural Resources Defense Council is an international nonprofit environmental organization with more than 1.3 million members and online activists. Since 1970, our lawyers, scientists, and other environmental specialists have worked to protect the world’s natural resources, public health, and the environment. NRDC has offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Montana, and Beijing. For more information, visit www.nrdc.org. Acknowledgments NRDC would like to thank the Energy Foundation, which provided generous support for the completion of this report, our external peer reviewers, Bill Senior and Jim Dooley, who both provided valuable feedback,
    [Show full text]
  • Slowing the Growth of Coal Power in China: the Role of Finance in State-Owned Enterprises
    Slowing the Growth of Coal Power in China: the Role of Finance in State-Owned Enterprises Morgan Hervé-Mignucci Xueying Wang David Nelson Uday Varadarajan December 2015 A CPI Report Acknowledgements We would like to give special thanks to Fredrich Kahrl and Alvin Lin for their valuable expertise and significant contributions in reviewing this paper. We would also like to thank Gang He, Shan Li, Fei Teng, Jianliang Wang, Xuehua Zhang, and Hansong Zhu for their thoughtful insights and feedback. We extend our sincere thanks to CPI staff members Ruby Barcklay, Amira Hankin, Tom Heller, David Nelson, Elysha Rom-Povolo, Uday Varadarajan, Tim Varga, and Maggie Young, who provided guidance and support throughout the course of this project. CPI would like to thank Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, without whose generous support this project would not have been possible. Descriptors Sector Energy Finance Region Global Keywords China, coal finance, State finance, state-owned enterprises, corporate finance, coal power Related CPI Reports Slowing the Growth of Coal Power Outside China: The Role of Chinese Finance Contact Morgan Hervé-Mignucci [email protected] Xueying Wang [email protected] About CPI Climate Policy Initiative works to improve the most important energy and land use policies around the world, with a particular focus on finance. An independent organization supported in part by a grant from the Open Society Foundations, CPI works in places that provide the most potential for policy impact including Brazil, China, Europe, India, Indonesia, and the United States. Our work helps nations grow while addressing increasingly scarce resources and climate risk.
    [Show full text]
  • CARBON CAPTURE & STORAGE POLICY in CHINA Contents INTRODUCTION
    CARBON CAPTURE & STORAGE POLICY IN CHINA By Yan Gu * Center for Climate Change Law White Paper, October 2013 Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 I. Potential of CCS in China ......................................................................................................................... 3 II. National policy environment for CCUS ................................................................................................... 7 III. Science, Technology and Development Policy ..................................................................................... 10 IV. Laws and Regulations on CCUS .......................................................................................................... 12 V. International Cooperation ...................................................................................................................... 16 VI. Challenges ahead and policy recommendations ................................................................................... 18 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 21 INTRODUCTION Climate change has already profoundly affected China’s landscape and ecosystems.1 To address the negative consequences, the central government is exploring a variety of different approaches to reduce domestic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. There are now seventeen
    [Show full text]
  • Greengen --- Near Zero Emission Coal Based Power Generation Project in China
    TPRI GreenGen --- Near Zero Emission Coal Based Power Generation Project in China Xu Shisen Thermal Power Research Institute Technology Development Center of CHNG 23th May 2007 TPRI ContentsContents WhyWhy doesdoes China needneed GreenGen ? Roadmap of GreenGen Program Demonstration Project R&D on Key Technologies Summary TPRI WhyWhy coalcoal ?? Oil NG Coal 300 200 100 0 Year 40 60 230 C : H (wt.%) 85:15 75:25 95:5 CO2 emission 80 60 100 TPRI WhyWhy Coal?Coal? Nuclear 1.1% 0.4% Renewable 20.7% Structure of Hydro China’s Electric Power Thermal 77.8% 2006 China’s electric power development 中国历年发电装机增长情况 70000 62200 60000 51718 50000 44239 39141 40000 35657 33849 31932 29877 27729 （万30000 千瓦） 25424 23654 21722 19989 18291 20000 16653 15147 13789 12664 11550 9382 10090 8012 8705 10000 6913 7236 7644 0 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 （年 ） CHNG’s electric power development CoalCoal’’ss problemproblem Average Coal Consumption Ratio (by end of 2006) China:366g/kWh How to increase efficiency? World:320 g/kWh How to reduce emissions? TPRI EmissionEmission ofof thermalthermal powerpower technologiestechnologies TPRI COE with CO2 capture and sequestration 90 COE $MWh with Capture 80 & Sequestration 70 COE $/MWh with CO2 60 Capture 50 COE $/MWh w/out 40 Capture 30 NGCC = Natural Gas Combined Cycle 20 IGCC = Integrated 10 Gasification 0 Combined Cycle NGCC 525 NGCC 525 IGCC 520 USC PC 600 USC PC – Hi-efficiency MW MW MW MW Pulverized coal ($3.50=$3.3
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Energy in China
    Understanding EnergyinChina Understanding Energy in China Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC) Institute of Energy Economics, Japan Tokyo, Japan www.ieej.or.jp/aperc [email protected] APERC 2008 Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre APERC 2008 APEC # 208-RE-01.1 ISBN 978-4-931482-36-4 Understanding EnergyinChina Understanding Energy in China Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC) Institute of Energy Economics, Japan Tokyo, Japan www.ieej.or.jp/aperc [email protected] APERC 2008 Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre APERC 2008 APEC # 208-RE-01.1 ISBN 978-4-931482-36-4 Published by Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC) Inui Building Kachidoki 16F, 1-13-1 Kachidoki Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0054 Japan Tel: (813) 5144-8551 Fax: (813) 5144-8555 Email: [email protected] (administration) 2008 Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre APEC#208-RE-01.1 ISBN 978-4-931482-36-4 Printed in Japan on FSC-certified stock FOREWORD We are honoured to present here Understanding energy in China. Our objective in this study has been to convey both the complexity and great progress made in Chinese energy development to a broad audience. This work is published by the Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre as an independent study and does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the APEC Energy Working Group, individual member economies, or other contributors. But we hope that it will serve as a useful basis for discussion and analysis both within and among APEC member economies for the enhancement of energy security, the promotion of regional cooperation, and in furthering sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Capture: from Today’S to Novel Technologies
    Report Report no. 18/20 Technology Scouting" - Carbon Capture: From Today’s to Novel Technologies width report no. 18/20 Technology Scouting - Carbon Capture: From Today’s to Novel Technologies This report was prepared by: Ashish Bhadola, Vivek Patel, Shailesh Potdar and Sudipta Mallick (FutureBridge) Under the supervision of: M. Yugo (Concawe Science Executive) A. Soler (Concawe Research Associate) At the request of: Concawe (Low Carbon Pathways and Carbon Capture & Storage Groups) Thanks for their contribution to the report. Reproduction permitted with due acknowledgement Concawe Brussels September 2020 I report no. 18/20 ABSTRACT The EU Commission has recently published its long-term strategic vision exploring different scenarios leading to an EU low-carbon economy by 2050. In all these scenarios, the Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) has been identified as a key technology to achieve this ambitious target, playing a crucial role to reduce emission levels required to limit global warming to 2°C and pursuit efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5°C. This study, conducted by Future Bridge at the request of Concawe, provides an overview of the carbon capture technologies state-of-art, with focus not only on the commercial but also on the near-term technologies, which are likely to be commercialized in the 2025-2030 timeframe, and on the several new emerging technologies. For this mapping exercise, FutureBridge has considered various techno-economic factors such as carbon capture efficiency/rates, purity, cost of CO2 capture per ton, levelised cost of electricity, risks and barriers to assess the near-term and emerging carbon capture technologies.
    [Show full text]