DOCSLIB.ORG

Master Document Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Copyright by Valentina Marzia Rossi 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Valentina Marzia Rossi Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Mixed-Energy Shallow-Marine Systems with Emphasis on Tidal Influence Committee: Ronald J. Steel, Supervisor Wonsuck Kim, Co-Supervisor Cornel Olariu William Fisher Sergio Longhitano Mixed-Energy Shallow-Marine Systems with Emphasis on Tidal Influence by Valentina Marzia Rossi, Laurea Magistrale Mixed-Energy Shallow-Marine Systems with Emphasis on Tidal Influence Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2016 Dedication To my mom, my dad, my sister, and Julio. “The mountains are calling and I must go” – John Muir “In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks” – John Muir “… non vogliate negar l'esperïenza, di retro al sol, del mondo sanza gente. Considerate la vostra semenza: fatti non foste a viver come bruti, ma per seguir virtute e canoscenza” Dante Alighieri, Divina Commedia, Inferno canto XXVI, 116-120 Acknowledgements I would like to thank all the people that helped me throughout my PhD. My family and Julio for their constant support and help. Ron Steel, my co-advisor, for his help and great geological discussions. Wonsuck Kim, my co-supervisor, for his help and for his great support. Cornel Olariu, for great discussions and for helping me to improve all my research ideas. Sergio Longhitano (and Marta), for his help and support, and for the great time in the field. Donatella Mellere, for constant support and for motivating me. Domenico Chiarella, for his help in the field and not only. The PI’s of the Lajas Project, and in particular Bob Dalrymple, for his great help in the field and for great discussions. I would also like to thank Vicente and Graciela, that made me feel like at home in Argentina, and made my field experience there unforgettable. All my friends in Ron’s and Wonsuck’s research groups, Jinyu, Yang, Xiaojie, Logan, Austin, Allison, Anastasia, Brandee, Si, Shunli, YeJin, Max, WoongMo. Finally, I would like to thank the companies and institutions that have supported my research: Statoil, VNG Norge, Woodside and BHP Billiton, the RioMAR consortium, GSA, IAS and the Ronald K. DeFord Field Scholarship Fund. v Mixed-Energy Shallow-Marine Systems with Emphasis on Tidal Influence Valentina Marzia Rossi, PhD The University of Texas at Austin, 2016 Supervisors: Ronald J. Steel and Wonsuck Kim This research investigates mixed-energy shallow marine depositional systems (i.e., subject to the influence of river, wave and tidal currents), with particular emphasis on the role of tidal currents in controlling the final stratigraphic product. In modern coastal areas and in the rock record, many sedimentary systems bear the signature of changing and overlapping coastal processes. Understanding the evolution of the mixed tidal systems and their stratigraphic expression is fundamental both to the science of dynamic stratigraphy and for a proper exploitation of the stored natural resources. The research was carried out using four datasets: an outcrop dataset of measured sedimentological sections from the Jurassic Lajas Formation, Argentina; a dataset of previously published literature of process variability and sedimentary structures; a dataset of numerical simulations produced with Delft3D software; and an outcrop dataset of measured sedimentological sections from the Pleistocene Siderno Strait, Italy. The data here presented highlight the great degree of process variability in the rock record, and the importance of tidal currents in controlling deltaic morphology and stratigraphic architecture. The strata of the Lajas Formation show a clear process partitioning in different reaches of the deltaic system (proximal vs. distal and regressive vs. transgressive). In particular, tidal currents strongly reworked the delta front at times, vi creating sand-rich and amalgamated sandbodies. This project demonstrates that disentangling the signals of river, wave and tidal currents in the stratigraphy leads to a better interpretation of ancient mixed-energy systems. The study of the literature database shows that some sedimentary structures can be considered reliable indicators of a particular process (river, waves or tides), whereas other structures cannot be tied with confidence to any particular process. A process probability value is calculated for each sedimentary structure, and thus quantifies process variability and its uncertainty. This work encourages a new, more detailed and more quantified field methodology for facies sedimentology. The numerical modeling of tide-influenced deltas using Delft3D shows how different degrees of tidal influence in river-dominated deltas affect delta morphology and stratigraphy, when tidal currents are flowing perpendicularly to the shoreline. Increasing tidal influence induces deeper and more stable distributary channels that act as efficient conduits for sediment transport basinward. The delta-front geometry is also affected by tidal current reworking, evolving into a compound clinoform geometry. The research on the Siderno Strait, in contrast, highlights tidal influence on deltaic stratigraphic evolution when tidal currents flow parallel to the coastline. River-dominated deltas entering the tide-dominated strait tend to show a deflection of the delta-front sands in a direction parallel to the dominant tidal current. The delta-front sands became reworked by tidal currents into large dune fields within the strait. vii Table of Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................................ xii List of Figures ...................................................................................................... xiv Chapter 1: Introduction ...........................................................................................1 Problems and Significance ..............................................................................1 Objectives .......................................................................................................3 Overview of Chapters .....................................................................................4 Chapter 2: The role of tidal, wave and river currents in the evolution of mixed-energy deltas: Example from the Lajas Formation (Argentina) .......................................................................................................4 Chapter 3: Quantifying process regime in ancient shallow marine mixed- energy depositional systems: what are sedimentary structures really telling us? ......................................................................................5 Chapter 4: Impact of tidal currents on delta-channel deepening, stratigraphic architecture and sediment bypass beyond the shoreline .......................................................................................................5 Chapter 5: Tidal and Fluvial Processes Interplay in an Early Pleistocene, Delta-Fed, Strait Margin (Calabria, southern Italy) ......................6 References .......................................................................................................7 Chapter 2: The role of tidal, wave and river currents in the evolution of mixed-energy deltas: Example from the Lajas Formation (Argentina) ...............................11 Abstract .........................................................................................................11 introduction ...................................................................................................12 Geological setting .........................................................................................16 The Lajas Formation ............................................................................17 Methodology .................................................................................................18 Facies associations and depositional environments ......................................20 Facies Association 1 (Coastal Plain) ....................................................25 Facies Association 1.1 (Upper Coastal Plain) .............................25 Facies Association 1.2 (Lower Delta Plain) ...............................27 viii Facies Association 1.3 (Lower Delta-Plain Interdistributary Bays) ............................................................................................30 Facies Association 1.4 (Lower Delta Plain) ...............................31 Process summary ........................................................................34 Facies Association 2 (Delta Front and Subaqueous Platform) ............35 Facies Association 2.1 (Delta-Front Mouth Bars) ......................35 Facies Association 2.2 (Tidally Reworked Bars and Dunes) .....39 Facies Association 2.3 (Subaqueous Platform) ..........................45 Facies Association 2.4 (Shoreface) .............................................49 Process summary ........................................................................51 Facies Association 3 (Prodelta and Offshore) .....................................52 Facies Association 3.1 (Prodelta) ...............................................52 Facies Association 3.2 (Offshore/Offshore Transition) ..............52 Process summary ........................................................................54 Facies Association
Recommended publications
  • Four Months in a Sneak-Box

    Four Months in a Sneak-Box

    Four Months in a Sneak-Box Nathaniel H. Bishop The Project Gutenberg EBook of Four Months in a Sneak-Box, by Nathaniel H. Bishop (#2 in our series by Nathaniel H. Bishop) Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing this or any other Project Gutenberg eBook. This header should be the first thing seen when viewing this Project Gutenberg file. Please do not remove it. Do not change or edit the header without written permission. Please read the "legal small print," and other information about the eBook and Project Gutenberg at the bottom of this file. Included is important information about your specific rights and restrictions in how the file may be used. You can also find out about how to make a donation to Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved. **Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts** **eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971** *****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of Volunteers!***** Title: Four Months in a Sneak-Box Author: Nathaniel H. Bishop Release Date: May, 2004 [EBook #5686] [Yes, we are more than one year ahead of schedule] [This file was first posted on August 7, 2002] Edition: 10 Language: English Character set encoding: ASCII *** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK, FOUR MONTHS IN A SNEAK-BOX *** This eBook was produced by Bruce Miller FOUR MONTHS IN A SNEAK-BOX. A BOAT VOYAGE OF 2600 MILES DOWN THE OHIO AND MISSISSIPPI RIVERS, AND ALONG THE GULF OF MEXICO.
  • Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Devonian Berea Sandstone in Southeastern Ohio

    Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Devonian Berea Sandstone in Southeastern Ohio

    SUBSURFACE FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE DEVONIAN BEREA SANDSTONE IN SOUTHEASTERN OHIO William T. Garnes A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2014 Committee: James Evans, Advisor Jeffrey Snyder Charles Onasch ii ABSTRACT James Evans, Advisor The Devonian Berea Sandstone is an internally complex, heterogeneous unit that appears prominently both in outcrop and subsurface in Ohio. While the unit is clearly deltaic in outcrops in northeastern Ohio, its depositional setting is more problematic in southeastern Ohio where it is only found in the subsurface. The goal of this project was to search for evidence of a barrier island/inlet channel depositional environment for the Berea Sandstone to assess whether the Berea Sandstone was deposited under conditions in southeastern Ohio unique from northeastern Ohio. This project involved looking at cores from 5 wells: 3426 (Athens Co.), 3425 (Meigs Co.), 3253 (Athens Co.), 3252 (Athens Co.), and 3251 (Athens Co.) In cores, the Berea Sandstone ranges from 2 to 10 m (8-32 ft) thick, with an average thickness of 6.3 m (20.7 ft). Core descriptions involved hand specimens, thin section descriptions, and core photography. In addition to these 5 wells, the gamma ray logs from 13 wells were used to interpret the architecture and lithologies of the Berea Sandstone in Athens Co. and Meigs Co. as well as surrounding Vinton, Washington, and Morgan counties. Analysis from this study shows evidence of deltaic lobe progradation, abandonment, and re-working. Evidence of interdistributary bays with shallow sub-tidal environments, as well as large sand bodies, is also present.
  • Four Months in a Sneak-Box : a Boat Voyage of 2600 Miles Down The

    Four Months in a Sneak-Box : a Boat Voyage of 2600 Miles Down The

    THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY ILLINOiS RISTORICAI SURVEY Four Months in a Sneak- Box. A BOAT VOYAGE OF 260O MILES DOWN THE OHIO AND MISSISSIPPI RIVERS, AND ALONG THE GULF OF MEXICO. BY NATHANIEL H. BISHOP, AUTHOR OF "a THOUSAND MILEs' WALK ACROSS SOUTH AMERICA,' ANU '"VoVAOE OK THE PAl'ER CANUii." BOSTON: LEE AND SHEPARD, PUBLISHERS. NEW YORK: CHARLES T. DILLINGHAM. 1S79. COPYRIGHT, 1S79, By Nathaniel II. Bishop. Electrotyped at the Boston Stereotype Foundry, 19 Spring Laue. TO THE OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE LIGHT HOUSE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE UNITED STATES Sbls ^ook is pcb'uatcb BY ONE WHO HAS LEARXED TO RESPECT THEIR HONEST, INTELLIGENT AND EFFICIENT LABORS IN SERVING THEIR GOVERNMENT, THEIR COUNTRYMEN, AND MANKIND GENERALLY. 1085S7 — INTRODUCTION. Eighteen months ago the author gave to the " public his Voyage of the Paper Canoe : — a geographical journey of 25oo miles from Ql'ebec to the Gulf of Mexico, during the YEARS 1874-5." The kind reception by the American press of the author's first journey to the great southern sea, and its republication in Great Britain and in France within so short a time of its appearance in the United States, have encouraged him to give the public a companion volume, "Four Months in A Sneak-Box," — which is a relation of the expe- riences of a second cruise to the Gulf of INIexico, but by a different route from that followed in the " Voyage of the Paper Canoe." This time the author procured one of the smallest and most com- fortable of boats — a purely American model, devel- oped bv the bay-men of the New Jersey coast of the United States, and recently introduced to the gunning V VI INTRODUCTION.
  • Ichnology, Depositional Dynamics and Sequence Stratigraphy Of

    Ichnology, Depositional Dynamics and Sequence Stratigraphy Of

    ICHNOLOGY, DEPOSITIONAL DYNAMICS AND SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY OF THE PLIO-PLEISTOCENE ORINOCO DELTA: MAYARO AND MORNE L’ENFER FORMATIONS, SOUTHERN TRINIDAD A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) In the Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada By SUDIPTA DASGUPTA Copyright Sudipta Dasgupta, November, 2015. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis as the partial fulfillment of requirements for a Ph.D. degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I understand and confirm that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be allowed by the Dr. Luis A. Buatois who supervised my thesis work or, in his absence, by the Head, Department of Geological Sciences, or the Dean of the Colleges of Graduate Studies and Research (CGSR), in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for any direct or indirect financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission or, in my absence, without written permission from my immediate heir. It is also implicit that appropriate recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. DISCLAIMER References in this thesis to any specific commercial product(s), process(es), or service(s) by trade name(s), trademark(s), manufacturer(s), private company(ies), or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its(or their) endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by me or the University of Saskatchewan.
  • Thomas Point: Chesapeake Bay's Most Famous Lighthouse

    Thomas Point: Chesapeake Bay's Most Famous Lighthouse

    UNDERWAY Thomas Point: Chesapeake Bay’s Most Famous Lighthouse f there is one lighthouse that symbolizes the beauty and his‐ I tory of Chesapeake Bay, it is Thomas Point Shoal Light. Located midbay about 8 miles southeast of Annapolis, Mary‐ land, “T.P.” (as locals call it) is an immensely popular waypoint for local sailors, and one of only 10 lighthouses in the nation with national landmark status. ) The light marks Thomas Point Shoal, a shallow spit below the TOP Chesapeake Bay Bridge that squeezes the deep‐draft Baltimore shipping channel close to the Eastern Shore. It is currently OPPOSITE, being restored by volunteers and is open for public tours. AND T.P. is the last working “screw‐pile” lighthouse — a distinc‐ tive regional type of marine architecture — out of more than 40 VE (ABO that once graced the Chesapeake. Seven large iron pilings were Y literally screwed into the muddy bottom of the bay, on which breaker and stone riprap protect the BLAKEL was built the wooden, six‐sided, three‐story cottage lighthouse, structure from ice floes in winter. about 20 feet above water. The beacon is 43 feet above mean Thomas Point was taken over from the Coast Guard by the city STEPHEN high water, visible for 11 miles. The lighthouse also serves as an of Annapolis in 2004. Restoration is being funded through a pub‐ OF NOAA data buoy for real‐time weather conditions. With exterior work (opposite) nearly completed, the iconic Thomas Y Built in 1875, T.P. housed two light‐tenders (on two‐week Point Shoal Light (above), located on Chesapeake Bay, looks better TES shifts) until it was automated in 1986.
  • Geology and Stratigraphy Column

    Geology and Stratigraphy Column

    Capitol Reef National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Geology “Geology knows no such word as forever.” —Wallace Stegner Capitol Reef National Park’s geologic story reveals a nearly complete set of Mesozoic-era sedimentary layers. For 200 million years, rock layers formed at or near sea level. About 75-35 million years ago tectonic forces uplifted them, forming the Waterpocket Fold. Forces of erosion have been sculpting this spectacular landscape ever since. Deposition If you could travel in time and visit Capitol Visiting Capitol Reef 180 million years ago, Reef 245 million years ago, you would not when the Navajo Sandstone was deposited, recognize the landscape. Imagine a coastal you would have been surrounded by a giant park, with beaches and tidal flats; the water sand sea, the largest in Earth’s history. In this moves in and out gently, shaping ripple marks hot, dry climate, wind blew over sand dunes, in the wet sand. This is the environment creating large, sweeping crossbeds now in which the sediments of the Moenkopi preserved in the sandstone of Capitol Dome Formation were deposited. and Fern’s Nipple. Now jump ahead 20 million years, to 225 All the sedimentary rock layers were laid million years ago. The tidal flats are gone and down at or near sea level. Younger layers were the climate supports a tropical jungle, filled deposited on top of older layers. The Moenkopi with swamps, primitive trees, and giant ferns. is the oldest layer visible from the visitor center, The water is stagnant and a humid breeze with the younger Chinle Formation above it.
  • Programmatic Environmental Assessment of Field Operations in the Northeast and Great Lakes National Marine Sanctuaries

    Programmatic Environmental Assessment of Field Operations in the Northeast and Great Lakes National Marine Sanctuaries

    Programmatic Environmental Assessment of Field Operations in the Northeast and Great Lakes National Marine Sanctuaries August 7, 2018 http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and NOAA Administrator RDML Tim Gallaudet, Ph.D., USN Ret. (Acting) Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management, National Ocean Service Russell Callender, Ph.D. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries John Armor, Director Rebecca Holyoke,Deputy Director Matt Brookhart, Acting Northeast and Great Lakes Regional Director Cover Photo The bow of the two-masted schooner EB Allen, sunk in 1871, and now lies within Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary. Photo: Tane Casserley/NOAA, Thunder Bay NMS Table of Contents Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................ iii Introduction .................................................................................................. iv 1.0 Purpose and Need ....................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose for the Action ............................................................................... 1 1.2 Need for the Action ..................................................................................... 1 2.0 Description of Proposed Action and Alternatives ................................2 2.1 Alternatives Considered But Not Analyzed in Further Detail
  • Geologic Map of the Roy 7.5' Quadrangle Weber And

    Geologic Map of the Roy 7.5' Quadrangle Weber And

    UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Plate 1 a divison of Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication MP-05-03 Utah Department of Natural Resources Geologic Map of the Roy 7.5' Quadrangle Qsm Qal1 Qsm Qal Qal Qal2 1 B 1 B' Qsm Qsm Qsm Qal1 Qsm Qal2 Qal2 Qsm Qsm Qal1 Qd2 Qd2 Qsm Qsm Qsm Qal1 G Qal2 Qd5 Qsm Qsm Qsm G Qal2 Qd Qdm 4 Qal2 Qd Qd1 1 Qal Qd2 Qsm 2 G Qd5 Qsm Qdm Qdm Qaf Qal3 Qd4 Qd4 Qdm Qd1 G Qd1 Qsm Qd3 Qd Qac Qdm Qdm 1 Qsm Qdm Qd5 U D Qd G Qsm Qal4 5 Qdm Qaf Qd1 Qd5 Qdm Qdm Qd1 Qac Qd Qd5 4 Qdm Qla G Qsm ? Qsm Qd Qsm 5 Qsm Qdm Qd1 Qaf Qsm Qd5 Qsm Qsm Qsm Qd5 Qdm Qsm Qda Qd4 Qd5 Qd4 G Qsm Qd Qsm 5 Qd3 Qaf Qaf Qd5 Qdm Qsm Qsm Qdm Qsm Qsm Qsm Qdm Qsm Qd5 Qsm Qd6 Qdm Qsm Qd1 Qla Qsm Qsm G Qsm Qsm Qdm Qsm Qsm Qsm Qsm Qda Qsm Qda Qd1 Qaf Qd4 Qdm U D Qsm Qd Qaf Qdm 1 G Qsm Qaf Qsm Qsm Qd6 Qaf Qdm Qsm Qaf Qaf Qd4 ? Qsm Qac Qlf G Qsm Qsm Qd3 Qat1 Qdm Qda Qaf Qaf Qd7 Qsm Qd4 Qda Qsm Qsm Qaf Qda Qat Qsm 2 Qaf Qaf Qsm Qlf G Qsm Qsm Qsm Qat3 Qaf Qac Qsm Qlf Qsm Qlf Qsm Qaf Qsm Qlf Qlf Qlf Qaf Qat Qat Qat 1 8 7 Qac G Qlf Qsm Qlf Qac Qsm Qat Qd8 5 Qat6 Qla Qal2 Qlf Qls Qaf Qlf Qd4 Qla Qac Qlf/Qd4 Qlf Qaf Qat8 Qat1 Qaf Qaf Qac Qac U D Qaf Qla Qal1 ? Qaf Qlf Qac Qaf Qlf Qat4 Qat2 Qac Qaf Qd9 Qal2 Qlf Qat Qac 3 Qaf Qaf Qd10 Qla Qla Qac Qlf Qaf Qd13 Qlf Qlf Qac Qlf/Qd G Qlf 4 Qlf Qd13 Qaf Qla Qaf Qaf Qms Qlf Qlf Qlf Qlf/Qd4 Qla Qlf/Qd4 Qla Qla Qla Qaf Qlf/Qd4 Qac Qlf Qla Qaf Qlf Qlf Qd11 Qlf Qlf Qaf Qlf/Qd4 G Qla Qla Qlf Qla Qaf Qac Qlf Qaf Qlf Qal1 Qlf Qac Qaf Qaf Qlf Qaf Qlf G Qlf Qla Qsm Qlf Qaf Qat9 Qac Qsm Qaf Qlf/Qd4 Qlf/Qd4 Qaf Qsm Qsm G Qlf Qla Qls/Qd13 Qaf Qlf Qaf Qaf Qaf Qlf Qal Qla 1 Qsm U D G Qla/Qd13 Qaf Qd12 ? Qlf/Qd4 Qls/Qd13 Qaf Qls/Qd Qla 13 Qd13 G Qla Qaf A Qlf Qd13 LH A' Base from U.S.
  • Oil and Gas Plays Ute Moutnain Ute Reservation, Colorado and New Mexico

    Oil and Gas Plays Ute Moutnain Ute Reservation, Colorado and New Mexico

    Ute Mountain Ute Indian Reservation Cortez R18W Karle Key Xu R17W T General Setting Mine Xu Xcu 36 Can y on N Xcu McElmo WIND RIVER 32 INDIAN MABEL The Ute Mountain Ute Reservation is located in the northwest RESERVATION MOUNTAIN FT HALL IND RES Little Moude Mine Xcu T N ern portion of New Mexico and the southwestern corner of Colorado UTE PEAK 35 N R16W (Fig. UM-1). The reservation consists of 553,008 acres in Montezu BLACK 666 T W Y O M I N G MOUNTAIN 35 R20W SLEEPING UTE MOUNTAIN N ma and La Plata Counties, Colorado, and San Juan County, New R19W Coche T Mexico. All of these lands belong to the tribe but are held in trust by NORTHWESTERN 34 SHOSHONI HERMANO the U.S. Government. Individually owned lands, or allotments, are IND RES Desert Canyon PEAK N MESA VERDE R14W NATIONAL GREAT SALT LAKE W Marble SENTINEL located at Allen Canyon and White Mesa, San Juan County, Utah, Wash Towaoc PARK PEAK T and cover 8,499 acres. Tribal lands held in trust within this area cov Towaoc River M E S A 33 1/2 N er 3,597 acres. An additional forty acres are defined as U.S. Govern THE MOUND R15W SKULL VALLEY ment lands in San Juan County, Utah, and are utilized for school pur TEXAS PACIFIC 6-INCH OIL PIPELINE IND RES UNITAH AND OURAY INDIAN RESERVATION Navajo poses. W Ramona GOSHUTE 789 The Allen Canyon allotments are located twelve miles west of IND RES T UTAH 33 Blanding, Utah, and adjacent to the Manti-La Sal National Forest.
  • Lithology and Subdivisions of the Jurassic Stump Formation in Southeastern Idaho and Adjoining Areas

    Lithology and Subdivisions of the Jurassic Stump Formation in Southeastern Idaho and Adjoining Areas

    Lithology and Subdivisions of the, . „ - nj,Jurassic ~ - -' - - - - Stump- - - - JL": •-Formation - - - - - in Southeastern Idaho and dning iGEOLOGlCAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1035-C Lithology and Subdivisions of the Jurassic Stump Formation in Southeastern Idaho and Adjoining Areas By GEORGE N. PIPIRINGOS and RALPH W. IMLAY UNCONFORMITIES, CORRELATION, AND NOMENCLATURE OF SOME TRIASSIC AND JURASSIC ROCKS, WESTERN INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1035-C Marked rapid lateral changes in lithology, fossil content, and thickness of the Stump Formation are due principally to erosion associated with the Cretaceous (K) and Jurassic (]-4) unconformities UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1979 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Pipiringos, George Nicholas, 1918- Lithology and subdivisions of the Jurassic stump formation in southeastern Idaho and adjoining areas. (Unconformities, correlation, and nomenclature of some Triassic and Jurassic rocks, western interior United States) (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1035-C) Bibliography: p. 25 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Jurassic. 2. Geology Idaho. 3. Geology The West. 4. Petrology Idaho. 5. Petrology-The West. I. Imlay, Ralph Willard, 1908-joint author. II. Title. HI. Series. IV. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1035-C. QE681.P49 551.7'6 78-1687 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government
  • CONKLIN-THESIS-2015.Pdf (7.932Mb)

    CONKLIN-THESIS-2015.Pdf (7.932Mb)

    QUATERNARY DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY OF A SHELF- MARGIN MINIBASIN, NORTHERN GULF OF MEXICO A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Houston In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science In Geology By Tucker Conklin May 2015 QUATERNARY DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY OF A SHELF- MARGIN MINIBASIN, NORTHERN GULF OF MEXICO ___________________________________________ Tucker Conklin APPROVED: ___________________________________________ Dr. Julia S. Wellner Chair of Committee ___________________________________________ Dr. William Sager ___________________________________________ Dr. Peter Emmet ___________________________________________ Dr. Kenneth Abdulah ___________________________________________ Dean, College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Julia Wellner for the opportunity to work under her for my degree. I cannot thank her enough for all of the support and advice that she has given me. I would also like to thank Dr. Pete Emmet for his help in getting this project started, and for his guidance throughout the duration of my time here. I would like to extend my appreciation to Dr. William Sager, and Dr. Kenneth Abdulah (BHP Billiton) for providing excellent feedback and advice in all stages of this project. I would also like to thank my parents, Doug and Joyce Conklin, and my fiancé, Drew Barnhart for their continued support throughout these last two years. iii QUATERNARY DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY OF A SHELF- MARGIN MINIBASIN, NORTHERN GULF OF MEXICO A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Houston In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science In Geology By Tucker Conklin April 2015 iv Abstract High-resolution 3D seismic data were used to study the evolution of a shelf- margin minibasin located approximately 160 km off of the coast of Louisiana.
  • Geology of the Northern Portion of the Fish Lake Plateau, Utah

    Geology of the Northern Portion of the Fish Lake Plateau, Utah

    GEOLOGY OF THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE FISH LAKE PLATEAU, UTAH DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State - University By DONALD PAUL MCGOOKEY, B.S., M.A* The Ohio State University 1958 Approved by Edmund M." Spieker Adviser Department of Geology CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION. ................................ 1 Locations and accessibility ........ 2 Physical features ......... _ ................... 5 Previous w o r k ......... 10 Field work and the geologic map ........ 12 Acknowledgements.................... 13 STRATIGRAPHY........................................ 15 General features................................ 15 Jurassic system......................... 16 Arapien shale .............................. 16 Twist Gulch formation...................... 13 Morrison (?) formation...................... 19 Cretaceous system .............................. 20 General character and distribution.......... 20 Indianola group ............................ 21 Mancos shale. ................... 24 Star Point sandstone................ 25 Blackhawk formation ........................ 26 Definition, lithology, and extent .... 26 Stratigraphic relations . ............ 23 Age . .............................. 23 Price River formation...................... 31 Definition, lithology, and extent .... 31 Stratigraphic relations ................ 34 A g e .................................... 37 Cretaceous and Tertiary systems . ............ 37 North Horn formation. ..........