Evolution of Microtubule Organizing Centers Across the Tree of Eukaryotes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution of Microtubule Organizing Centers Across the Tree of Eukaryotes The Plant Journal (2013) 75, 230–244 doi: 10.1111/tpj.12145 A GLORIOUS HALF-CENTURY OF MICROTUBULES Evolution of microtubule organizing centers across the tree of eukaryotes Naoji Yubuki* and Brian S. Leander The Departments of Botany and Zoology, Beaty Biodiversity Research Centre and Museum, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada Received 16 December 2012; revised 04 February 2013; accepted 5 February 2013; published online 8 February 2013. *For correspondence (e-mail [email protected]). SUMMARY The architecture of eukaryotic cells is underpinned by complex arrrays of microtubules that stem from an organizing center, referred to as the MTOC. With few exceptions, MTOCs consist of two basal bodies that anchor flagellar axonemes and different configurations of microtubular roots. Variations in the structure of this cytoskeletal system, also referred to as the ‘flagellar apparatus’, reflect phylogenetic relationships and provide compelling evidence for inferring the overall tree of eukaryotes. However, reconstructions and sub- sequent comparisons of the flagellar apparatus are challenging, because these studies require sophisticated microscopy, spatial reasoning and detailed terminology. In an attempt to understand the unifying features of MTOCs and broad patterns of cytoskeletal homology across the tree of eukaryotes, we present a compre- hensive overview of the eukaryotic flagellar apparatus within a modern molecular phylogenetic context. Specifically, we used the known cytoskeletal diversity within major groups of eukaryotes to infer the unifying features (ancestral states) for the flagellar apparatus in the Plantae, Opisthokonta, Amoebozoa, Stramenopiles, Alveolata, Rhizaria, Excavata, Cryptophyta, Haptophyta, Apusozoa, Breviata and Collodictyo- nidae. We then mapped these data onto the tree of eukaryotes in order to trace broad patterns of trait changes during the evolutionary history of the flagellar apparatus. This synthesis suggests that: (i) the most recent ancestor of all eukaryotes already had a complex flagellar apparatus, (ii) homologous traits associ- ated with the flagellar apparatus have a punctate distribution across the tree of eukaryotes, and (iii) stream- lining (trait losses) of the ancestral flagellar apparatus occurred several times independently in eukaryotes. Keywords: biodiversity, cytoskeleton, evolution, excavates, flagellar apparatus, protists. Apusozoa, Breviata, Collodictyonidae, Cryptophyta and A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF EUKARYOTIC DIVERSITY Haptophyta) and five major clades or ‘supergroups’ [the Eukaryotes that are not plants, animals or fungi, the so- Plantae, Opisthokonta, Amoebozoa, SAR (Stramenopiles, called ‘protists’, are much more diverse than is usually Alveolata and Rhizaria) and Excavata] (Kim et al., 2006; appreciated, particularly in regard to total species numbers Burki et al., 2009; Roger and Simpson, 2009; Ishida et al., and the ultrastructural and genomic complexity of their 2010; Parfrey et al., 2010; Heiss et al., 2011; Adl et al., 2012; cells (Ishida et al., 2010; Parfrey et al., 2010; Adl et al., Zhao et al., 2012). 2012). A comprehensive tree of eukaryotes with resolved Land plants, animals and fungi are each most closely phylogenetic relationships among dozens of very different related to different lineages of single-celled eukaryotes, lineages is beginning to emerge through the rapid accumu- and are nested within different supergroups. For instance, lation and comparative analysis of genomic data (e.g., land plants are nested within the Plantae, which also Parfrey et al., 2010; Burki et al., 2012; Brown et al.,2012).This includes red algae, green algae and glaucophytes (Graham phylogenetic context provides the foundation for inferences and Wilcox, 2000; Archibald and Keeling, 2004) (Figures about the evolution of the eukaryotic cytoskeleton. The 1a–c). Members of this supergroup possess plastids that most widely accepted tree of eukaryotes currently consists were derived directly from a cyanobacterium via (primary) of several minor groups, without a clear sister lineage (the endosymbiosis; glaucophytes still possess a cyanobacterial 230 © 2013 The Authors The Plant Journal © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Macroevolution of microtubule organizing centers 231 Figure 1. Images representing major lineages of eukaryotes. Some photos are modified with (a) (b) (c) permission from Micro*scope (c, g, h, k): (a) Marchantiophyta, Conocephalum; (b) Rhodophyta, Phacelocarpus; (c) Glaucophyta, Cyanophora; (d) Scyphozoa, Chrysaora; (e) Choanoflagellata (f) Fungi, Agaricus; (g) Myxogastria, Dydimium (‘Hyperamoeba’); (h) Archeamoeba, Mastigina; (i) Myxogastria, Physarum; (d) (e) (f) (j) Stramenopile, Mallomonas; (k) Dinoflagellate, Polykrikos; (l) Rhizaria, Calcarina; (m) Metamonada, Trichonympha; (n) Discoba, Rapaza. (o) Metamonada, Kipferlia; (p) Cryptophyta, Chroomonas; (q) Cryptophyta, Cryptomonas; (r) Haptophyta, Gephyrocapsa. (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r) cell wall around their plastids (Aitken and Stanier, 1979; tains a diverse assemblage of amoeboflagellates and slime Scott et al., 1984). Animals and fungi are both nested molds (Watkins and Gray, 2008; Shadwick et al., 2009) (Fig- within the Opisthokonta, which also includes choanoflagel- ures 1g–i). The Apusozoa branches as the nearest sister lates and chytrids, among other lineages (Lang et al., 2002) group to a clade consisting of the Opisthokonta and (Figures 1d–f). Most species in this supergroup possess a Amoebozoa (a clade that was once recognized as ‘uni- posterior flagellum that undulates to push the cell konts’; Kim et al., 2006; Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2010). forwards (Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2003a). The nearest Most of the supergroups also contain representatives of sister group to opisthokonts is the Amoebozoa, which con- what are arguably the three most dissimilar modes of © 2013 The Authors The Plant Journal © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2013), 75, 230–244 232 Naoji Yubuki and Brian S. Leander (eukaryotic) life on the planet: photoautotrophs, predators images of eukaryotic cells were taken with a transmission and parasites. For instance, the SAR clade contains plant-like electron microscope in the 1960s. The most recent review kelps and diatoms, saprophytic water molds (oomycetes), of the eukaryotic flagellar apparatus in microalgae was filter-feeding radiolarians, predatory ciliates and the notori- published more than a decade ago (Moestrup, 2000); how- ous blood-born parasite Plasmodium (Patterson, 1989; Cava- ever, a lot has changed since then, especially knowledge lier-Smith and Chao, 2003b; Leander and Keeling, 2003; about new lineages of eukaryotic cells and where they fit Roger and Simpson, 2009; Burki et al., 2010; Parfrey et al., into the overall tree of eukaryotes. In an attempt to under- 2010) (Figures 1j–l). The Excavata contains photosynthetic stand broad patterns of cytoskeletal homology in eukary- Euglena and relatives, the diarrhea-causing parasite Giardia, otes, we present a relatively comprehensive overview and several other different lineages of parasites and free-liv- of the eukaryotic flagellar apparatus within a modern ing phagotrophs (Figures 1m–o). There is still debate as to molecular phylogenetic context. We address the known whether or not the Excavata is monophyletic (a group that cytoskeletal diversity within the major groups of eukary- consists of an ancestor and all of its descendants), an infer- otes introduced above in order to infer ancestral traits and ence that happens to be crucial for understanding the origin subsequent trait changes during the evolutionary history and evolution of the eukaryotic cytoskeleton (Simpson and of the flagellar apparatus. Roger, 2004; Simpson et al., 2006). The synthesis of cyto- The eukaryotic flagellar apparatus is almost always com- skeletal traits we provide below suggests that the Excavata posed of two (or more) basal bodies that anchor the axo- is not monophyletic and instead represents a (paraphyletic) nemes, if present, and different microtubular roots; the stem group from which all other eukaryotes evolved. system functions as the MTOC for the entire eukaryotic cell (Moestrup, 1982; Sleigh, 1988; Andersen et al., 1991; Beech FUNDAMENTAL FEATURES OF MTOCS: THE FLAGELLAR et al., 1991; Moestrup, 2000) (Figure 2). The flagellar appa- APPARATUS ratus is therefore a complex ultrastructural system in Comparative morphology of the microtubular cytoskeleton almost every eukaryotic cell, and plays vital roles in a in eukaryotes started at about the same time the first variety of cell functions, such as locomotion, feeding (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Figure 2. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) sections showing the divesity and major components of the flagellar apparatus in five representive lineages of eukaryotes: (a) Plantae, Pyramimonas (‘Prasinophyta’), modified with permission from Hori and Moestrup (1987); (b) Stramenopile, Apoikia (Stramenopile); (c) Excavata, Uteronympha (Metamonada), modified with permission from Brugerolle (2006b); (d) Haptophyta, Pleurochrysis, modified with permission from Inouye and Pienaar (1985); (e) Collodictyonidae, Collodictyon, modified with permission from Brugerolle et al. (2002). Scale bars: (a, b, d, e) 200 nm; (c) 400 nm. © 2013 The Authors The Plant Journal © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2013), 75, 230–244 Macroevolution of microtubule organizing centers 233 (phagocytosis), and the formation of microtubular arrays THE DIVERSITY OF MTOCS REFLECTS THE
Recommended publications
  • Morphology, Phylogeny, and Diversity of Trichonympha (Parabasalia: Hypermastigida) of the Wood-Feeding Cockroach Cryptocercus Punctulatus
    J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 56(4), 2009 pp. 305–313 r 2009 The Author(s) Journal compilation r 2009 by the International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00406.x Morphology, Phylogeny, and Diversity of Trichonympha (Parabasalia: Hypermastigida) of the Wood-Feeding Cockroach Cryptocercus punctulatus KEVIN J. CARPENTER, LAWRENCE CHOW and PATRICK J. KEELING Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Botany Department, University of British Columbia, University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 ABSTRACT. Trichonympha is one of the most complex and visually striking of the hypermastigote parabasalids—a group of anaerobic flagellates found exclusively in hindguts of lower termites and the wood-feeding cockroach Cryptocercus—but it is one of only two genera common to both groups of insects. We investigated Trichonympha of Cryptocercus using light and electron microscopy (scanning and transmission), as well as molecular phylogeny, to gain a better understanding of its morphology, diversity, and evolution. Microscopy reveals numerous new features, such as previously undetected bacterial surface symbionts, adhesion of post-rostral flagella, and a dis- tinctive frilled operculum. We also sequenced small subunit rRNA gene from manually isolated species, and carried out an environmental polymerase chain reaction (PCR) survey of Trichonympha diversity, all of which strongly supports monophyly of Trichonympha from Cryptocercus to the exclusion of those sampled from termites. Bayesian and distance methods support a relationship between Tricho- nympha species from termites and Cryptocercus, although likelihood analysis allies the latter with Eucomonymphidae. A monophyletic Trichonympha is of great interest because recent evidence supports a sister relationship between Cryptocercus and termites, suggesting Trichonympha predates the Cryptocercus-termite divergence.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Publication (PDF File)
    PUBLIC LIBRARY of SCIENCE | plosgenetics.org | ISSN 1553-7390 | Volume 2 | Issue 12 | DECEMBER 2006 GENETICS PUBLIC LIBRARY of SCIENCE www.plosgenetics.org Volume 2 | Issue 12 | DECEMBER 2006 Interview Review Knight in Common Armor: 1949 Unraveling the Genetics 1956 An Interview with Sir John Sulston e225 of Human Obesity e188 Jane Gitschier David M. Mutch, Karine Clément Research Articles Natural Variants of AtHKT1 1964 The Complete Genome 2039 Enhance Na+ Accumulation e210 Sequence and Comparative e206 in Two Wild Populations of Genome Analysis of the High Arabidopsis Pathogenicity Yersinia Ana Rus, Ivan Baxter, enterocolitica Strain 8081 Balasubramaniam Muthukumar, Nicholas R. Thomson, Sarah Jeff Gustin, Brett Lahner, Elena Howard, Brendan W. Wren, Yakubova, David E. Salt Matthew T. G. Holden, Lisa Crossman, Gregory L. Challis, About the Cover Drosophila SPF45: A Bifunctional 1974 Carol Churcher, Karen The jigsaw image of representatives Protein with Roles in Both e178 Mungall, Karen Brooks, Tracey of various lines of eukaryote evolution Splicing and DNA Repair Chillingworth, Theresa Feltwell, refl ects the current lack of consensus as Ahmad Sami Chaouki, Helen K. Zahra Abdellah, Heidi Hauser, to how the major branches of eukaryotes Salz Kay Jagels, Mark Maddison, fi t together. The illustrations from upper Sharon Moule, Mandy Sanders, left to bottom right are as follows: a single Mammalian Small Nucleolar 1984 Sally Whitehead, Michael A. scale from the surface of Umbellosphaera; RNAs Are Mobile Genetic e205 Quail, Gordon Dougan, Julian Amoeba, the large amoeboid organism Elements Parkhill, Michael B. Prentice used as an introduction to protists for Michel J. Weber many school children; Euglena, the iconic Low Levels of Genetic 2052 fl agellate that is often used to challenge Soft Sweeps III: The Signature 1998 Divergence across e215 ideas of plants (Euglena has chloroplasts) of Positive Selection from e186 Geographically and and animals (Euglena moves); Stentor, Recurrent Mutation Linguistically Diverse one of the larger ciliates; Cacatua, the Pleuni S.
    [Show full text]
  • Culturing and Targeted Pacbio RS Amplicon Sequencing Reveals a Higher Order Taxonomic Diversity and Global Distribution
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/199125; this version posted October 8, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Enigmatic Diphyllatea eukaryotes: Culturing and targeted PacBio RS amplicon sequencing reveals a higher order taxonomic diversity and global distribution Orr Russell J.S.1,2*, Zhao Sen3,4, Klaveness Dag5, Yabuki Akinori6, Ikeda Keiji7, Makoto M. Watanabe7, Shalchian-Tabrizi Kamran1,2* 1 Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (EVOGENE), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway 2 Centre for Integrative Microbial Evolution (CIME), Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (EVOGENE), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway 3 Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway 4 Medical Faculty, Center for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway 5 Section for Aquatic Biology and Toxicology (AQUA), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway 6 Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Sciences and Technology (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Natsushima, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan 7 Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan * Corresponding authors: Russell J. S. Orr & Kamran Shalchian-Tabrizi Email: [email protected] Mobile: +4748187013 Email: [email protected] Mobile: +4741045328 Address: Kristine Bonnevies hus, Blindernveien 31, 0371 Oslo, Norway Keywords: Diphyllatea, PacBio, rRNA, phylogeny, diversity, Collodictyon, amplicon, Sulcozoa 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/199125; this version posted October 8, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Is a Ubiquitous, Ancient, and Inherent Attribute of Eukaryotic Life
    PAPER Sex is a ubiquitous, ancient, and inherent attribute of COLLOQUIUM eukaryotic life Dave Speijera,1, Julius Lukešb,c, and Marek Eliášd,1 aDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; bInstitute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, and Faculty of Sciences, University of South Bohemia, 370 05 Ceské Budejovice, Czech Republic; cCanadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1Z8; and dDepartment of Biology and Ecology, University of Ostrava, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic Edited by John C. Avise, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved April 8, 2015 (received for review February 14, 2015) Sexual reproduction and clonality in eukaryotes are mostly Sex in Eukaryotic Microorganisms: More Voyeurs Needed seen as exclusive, the latter being rather exceptional. This view Whereas absence of sex is considered as something scandalous for might be biased by focusing almost exclusively on metazoans. a zoologist, scientists studying protists, which represent the ma- We analyze and discuss reproduction in the context of extant jority of extant eukaryotic diversity (2), are much more ready to eukaryotic diversity, paying special attention to protists. We accept that a particular eukaryotic group has not shown any evi- present results of phylogenetically extended searches for ho- dence of sexual processes. Although sex is very well documented mologs of two proteins functioning in cell and nuclear fusion, in many protist groups, and members of some taxa, such as ciliates respectively (HAP2 and GEX1), providing indirect evidence for (Alveolata), diatoms (Stramenopiles), or green algae (Chlor- these processes in several eukaryotic lineages where sex has oplastida), even serve as models to study various aspects of sex- – not been observed yet.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER Norman, Oklahoma 2017 MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY AND PLANT BIOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Boris Wawrik, Chair ______________________________ Dr. J. Phil Gibson ______________________________ Dr. Anne K. Dunn ______________________________ Dr. John Paul Masly ______________________________ Dr. K. David Hambright ii © Copyright by JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER 2017 All Rights Reserved. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my two advisors Dr. Boris Wawrik and Dr. J. Phil Gibson for helping me become a better scientist and better educator. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Anne K. Dunn, Dr. K. David Hambright, and Dr. J.P. Masly for providing valuable inputs that lead me to carefully consider my research questions. I would also like to thank Dr. J.P. Masly for the opportunity to coauthor a book chapter on the speciation of diatoms. It is still such a privilege that you believed in me and my crazy diatom ideas to form a concise chapter in addition to learn your style of writing has been a benefit to my professional development. I’m also thankful for my first undergraduate research mentor, Dr. Miriam Steinitz-Kannan, now retired from Northern Kentucky University, who was the first to show the amazing wonders of pond scum. Who knew that studying diatoms and algae as an undergraduate would lead me all the way to a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • A Resurgence in Field Research Is Essential to Better Understand
    Received Date : 15-Mar-2013 Revised Date : 21-Oct-2013 Accepted Date : 29-Oct-2013 Article type : Symposium Article Heger et al. --- Importance of Field Protistology A Resurgence in Field Research is Essential to Better Understand the Diversity, Ecology, and Evolution of Microbial Eukaryotes Thierry J. Hegera, Virginia P. Edgcombb, Eunsoo Kimc, Julius Lukešd, Brian S. Leandera & Naoji Yubukia a The Departments of Botany and Zoology, Beaty Biodiversity Research Centre and Museum, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada b Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Geology and Geophysics Department, Woods Hole, Article MA 02543, USA c Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, 10024, USA d Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, and Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic Correspondence T. J. Heger and N. Yubuki, The Departments of Botany and Zoology, Beaty Biodiversity Research Centre and Museum, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada Telephone number: +1 604 822 4892; FAX number: +1 604 822 6089; emails: [email protected] and [email protected] ABSTRACT The discovery and characterization of protist communities from diverse environments are crucial for understanding the overall evolutionary history of life on earth. However, major questions about the diversity, ecology, and evolutionary history of protists remain unanswered,
    [Show full text]
  • Multigene Eukaryote Phylogeny Reveals the Likely Protozoan Ancestors of Opis- Thokonts (Animals, Fungi, Choanozoans) and Amoebozoa
    Accepted Manuscript Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opis- thokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa Thomas Cavalier-Smith, Ema E. Chao, Elizabeth A. Snell, Cédric Berney, Anna Maria Fiore-Donno, Rhodri Lewis PII: S1055-7903(14)00279-6 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.08.012 Reference: YMPEV 4996 To appear in: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Received Date: 24 January 2014 Revised Date: 2 August 2014 Accepted Date: 11 August 2014 Please cite this article as: Cavalier-Smith, T., Chao, E.E., Snell, E.A., Berney, C., Fiore-Donno, A.M., Lewis, R., Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (2014), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ympev.2014.08.012 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 1 Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts 2 (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa 3 4 Thomas Cavalier-Smith1, Ema E. Chao1, Elizabeth A. Snell1, Cédric Berney1,2, Anna Maria 5 Fiore-Donno1,3, and Rhodri Lewis1 6 7 1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Classification of Naked Lobose Amoebae (Amoebozoa
    Protist, Vol. 162, 545–570, October 2011 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 28 July 2011 PROTIST NEWS A Revised Classification of Naked Lobose Amoebae (Amoebozoa: Lobosa) Introduction together constitute the amoebozoan subphy- lum Lobosa, which never have cilia or flagella, Molecular evidence and an associated reevaluation whereas Variosea (as here revised) together with of morphology have recently considerably revised Mycetozoa and Archamoebea are now grouped our views on relationships among the higher-level as the subphylum Conosa, whose constituent groups of amoebae. First of all, establishing the lineages either have cilia or flagella or have lost phylum Amoebozoa grouped all lobose amoe- them secondarily (Cavalier-Smith 1998, 2009). boid protists, whether naked or testate, aerobic Figure 1 is a schematic tree showing amoebozoan or anaerobic, with the Mycetozoa and Archamoe- relationships deduced from both morphology and bea (Cavalier-Smith 1998), and separated them DNA sequences. from both the heterolobosean amoebae (Page and The first attempt to construct a congruent molec- Blanton 1985), now belonging in the phylum Per- ular and morphological system of Amoebozoa by colozoa - Cavalier-Smith and Nikolaev (2008), and Cavalier-Smith et al. (2004) was limited by the the filose amoebae that belong in other phyla lack of molecular data for many amoeboid taxa, (notably Cercozoa: Bass et al. 2009a; Howe et al. which were therefore classified solely on morpho- 2011). logical evidence. Smirnov et al. (2005) suggested The phylum Amoebozoa consists of naked and another system for naked lobose amoebae only; testate lobose amoebae (e.g. Amoeba, Vannella, this left taxa with no molecular data incertae sedis, Hartmannella, Acanthamoeba, Arcella, Difflugia), which limited its utility.
    [Show full text]
  • Trichonympha Burlesquei N. Sp. from Reticulitermes Virginicus and Evidence Against a Cosmopolitan Distribution of Trichonympha Agilis in Many Termite Hosts
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2013), 63, 3873–3876 DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.054874-0 Trichonympha burlesquei n. sp. from Reticulitermes virginicus and evidence against a cosmopolitan distribution of Trichonympha agilis in many termite hosts Erick R. James,1 Vera Tai,1 Rudolf H. Scheffrahn2 and Patrick J. Keeling1 Correspondence 1Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Patrick J. Keeling Vancouver, BC, Canada [email protected] 2University of Florida Research & Education Center, 3205 College Avenue, Davie, FL 33314, USA Historically, symbiotic protists in termite hindguts have been considered to be the same species if they are morphologically similar, even if they are found in different host species. For example, the first-described hindgut and hypermastigote parabasalian, Trichonympha agilis (Leidy, 1877) has since been documented in six species of Reticulitermes, in addition to the original discovery in Reticulitermes flavipes. Here we revisit one of these, Reticulitermes virginicus, using molecular phylogenetic analysis from single-cell isolates and show that the Trichonympha in R. virginicus is distinct from isolates in the type host and describe this novel species as Trichonympha burlesquei n. sp. We also show the molecular diversity of Trichonympha from the type host R. flavipes is greater than supposed, itself probably representing more than one species. All of this is consistent with recent data suggesting a major underestimate of termite symbiont diversity. Members of the genus Trichonympha are large and species of termite: in practice, similar-looking symbionts of structurally complex parabasalians exclusively found in the genus Trichonympha from different termite species are the symbiotic, lignocellulose-digesting hindgut community assumed to be the same species.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Characterization and Phylogeny of Four New Species of the Genus Trichonympha (Parabasalia, Trichonymphea) from Lower Termite Hindguts
    TAXONOMIC DESCRIPTION Boscaro et al., Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017;67:3570–3575 DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.002169 Molecular characterization and phylogeny of four new species of the genus Trichonympha (Parabasalia, Trichonymphea) from lower termite hindguts Vittorio Boscaro,1,* Erick R. James,1 Rebecca Fiorito,1 Elisabeth Hehenberger,1 Anna Karnkowska,1,2 Javier del Campo,1 Martin Kolisko,1,3 Nicholas A. T. Irwin,1 Varsha Mathur,1 Rudolf H. Scheffrahn4 and Patrick J. Keeling1 Abstract Members of the genus Trichonympha are among the most well-known, recognizable and widely distributed parabasalian symbionts of lower termites and the wood-eating cockroach species of the genus Cryptocercus. Nevertheless, the species diversity of this genus is largely unknown. Molecular data have shown that the superficial morphological similarities traditionally used to identify species are inadequate, and have challenged the view that the same species of the genus Trichonympha can occur in many different host species. Ambiguities in the literature, uncertainty in identification of both symbiont and host, and incomplete samplings are limiting our understanding of the systematics, ecology and evolution of this taxon. Here we describe four closely related novel species of the genus Trichonympha collected from South American and Australian lower termites: Trichonympha hueyi sp. nov. from Rugitermes laticollis, Trichonympha deweyi sp. nov. from Glyptotermes brevicornis, Trichonympha louiei sp. nov. from Calcaritermes temnocephalus and Trichonympha webbyae sp. nov. from Rugitermes bicolor. We provide molecular barcodes to identify both the symbionts and their hosts, and infer the phylogeny of the genus Trichonympha based on small subunit rRNA gene sequences. The analysis confirms the considerable divergence of symbionts of members of the genus Cryptocercus, and shows that the two clades of the genus Trichonympha harboured by termites reflect only in part the phylogeny of their hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Protist Phylogeny and the High-Level Classification of Protozoa
    Europ. J. Protistol. 39, 338–348 (2003) © Urban & Fischer Verlag http://www.urbanfischer.de/journals/ejp Protist phylogeny and the high-level classification of Protozoa Thomas Cavalier-Smith Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK; E-mail: [email protected] Received 1 September 2003; 29 September 2003. Accepted: 29 September 2003 Protist large-scale phylogeny is briefly reviewed and a revised higher classification of the kingdom Pro- tozoa into 11 phyla presented. Complementary gene fusions reveal a fundamental bifurcation among eu- karyotes between two major clades: the ancestrally uniciliate (often unicentriolar) unikonts and the an- cestrally biciliate bikonts, which undergo ciliary transformation by converting a younger anterior cilium into a dissimilar older posterior cilium. Unikonts comprise the ancestrally unikont protozoan phylum Amoebozoa and the opisthokonts (kingdom Animalia, phylum Choanozoa, their sisters or ancestors; and kingdom Fungi). They share a derived triple-gene fusion, absent from bikonts. Bikonts contrastingly share a derived gene fusion between dihydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthase and include plants and all other protists, comprising the protozoan infrakingdoms Rhizaria [phyla Cercozoa and Re- taria (Radiozoa, Foraminifera)] and Excavata (phyla Loukozoa, Metamonada, Euglenozoa, Percolozoa), plus the kingdom Plantae [Viridaeplantae, Rhodophyta (sisters); Glaucophyta], the chromalveolate clade, and the protozoan phylum Apusozoa (Thecomonadea, Diphylleida). Chromalveolates comprise kingdom Chromista (Cryptista, Heterokonta, Haptophyta) and the protozoan infrakingdom Alveolata [phyla Cilio- phora and Miozoa (= Protalveolata, Dinozoa, Apicomplexa)], which diverged from a common ancestor that enslaved a red alga and evolved novel plastid protein-targeting machinery via the host rough ER and the enslaved algal plasma membrane (periplastid membrane).
    [Show full text]
  • Author's Manuscript (764.7Kb)
    1 BROADLY SAMPLED TREE OF EUKARYOTIC LIFE Broadly Sampled Multigene Analyses Yield a Well-resolved Eukaryotic Tree of Life Laura Wegener Parfrey1†, Jessica Grant2†, Yonas I. Tekle2,6, Erica Lasek-Nesselquist3,4, Hilary G. Morrison3, Mitchell L. Sogin3, David J. Patterson5, Laura A. Katz1,2,* 1Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts, 611 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA 2Department of Biological Sciences, Smith College, 44 College Lane, Northampton, Massachusetts 01063, USA 3Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution, Marine Biological Laboratory, 7 MBL Street, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA 4Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, 80 Waterman Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA 5Biodiversity Informatics Group, Marine Biological Laboratory, 7 MBL Street, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA 6Current address: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA †These authors contributed equally *Corresponding author: L.A.K - [email protected] Phone: 413-585-3825, Fax: 413-585-3786 Keywords: Microbial eukaryotes, supergroups, taxon sampling, Rhizaria, systematic error, Excavata 2 An accurate reconstruction of the eukaryotic tree of life is essential to identify the innovations underlying the diversity of microbial and macroscopic (e.g. plants and animals) eukaryotes. Previous work has divided eukaryotic diversity into a small number of high-level ‘supergroups’, many of which receive strong support in phylogenomic analyses. However, the abundance of data in phylogenomic analyses can lead to highly supported but incorrect relationships due to systematic phylogenetic error. Further, the paucity of major eukaryotic lineages (19 or fewer) included in these genomic studies may exaggerate systematic error and reduces power to evaluate hypotheses.
    [Show full text]