International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences Submitted: 2018-03-24 ISSN: 2300-2697, Vol. 82, pp 19-23 Revised: 2018-05-07 doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.82.19 Accepted: 2018-05-10 CC BY 4.0. Published by SciPress Ltd, Switzerland, 2018 Online: 2018-06-11 Steinbeck’s East of Eden: Redefining the Evil within Cathy Ames 1,a* Bianca Saputra 1James B. Conant High School, Hoffman Estates, USA a*
[email protected] Keywords: Archetypes, Feminism, East of Eden, Cathy Ames, John Steinbeck, Literary Theory Abstract. East of Eden, published in 1952, has been criticized as both feminist and misogynistic in nature. This contrasting criticism can be attributed to the varied interpretations of female roles in the novel. This paper aims to examine East of Eden using feminist and archetypal theory. Archetypal theory studies roles characters play through fundamental and inherited symbols. These symbols are thematic associations that are common to humanity in general. Feminist theory analyzes texts based on how power is manipulated to establish the dominance or subordination of either gender. In particular, feminist theory studies how females claim, assert or subvert power for themselves. Coupled together, the theories seek to understand how established conventions influence the female experience. By analyzing the intersection between the roles portrayed by the women in the Salinas Valley and societal expectations, this paper intends to explore the influence of tradition on decision making. 1. Introduction Children are taught from a young age to fear monsters; in fact, part of the reason monsters are so alarming is due to the fact that they represent inner darkness that no one wishes to acknowledge.