Link Union Station Rail Planning Technical Memorandum January 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Link Union Station Rail Planning Technical Memorandum January 2019 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Link Union Station Rail Planning Technical Memorandum January 2019 (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK) Link Union Station January 2019 Rail Planning Technical Memorandum CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background and Concurrent Operational Analysis .............................................. 1 1.2 Project Location and Study Area ........................................................................................ 3 1.3 Project Components .......................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Build Alternatives and Design Options ........................................................................... 13 2.0 Objective of the Memorandum ..................................................................................................... 15 3.0 Existing Rail Operating Conditions and Characteristics .............................................................. 17 3.1 Existing Metrolink Trains ................................................................................................. 17 3.2 Existing Amtrak Trains ..................................................................................................... 18 4.0 Future Service Planning Assumptions and Data Sources ........................................................... 19 4.1 Metrolink .......................................................................................................................... 20 4.1.1 Equipment Turn Time ......................................................................................... 20 4.1.2 Dwell Time ........................................................................................................... 21 4.1.3 Service Hours by Train Line ................................................................................ 21 4.2 Pacific Surfliner and Amtrak ............................................................................................ 21 4.2.1 Equipment Turn Time and Dwell Time .............................................................. 21 4.3 California High-Speed Rail Authority ............................................................................... 22 4.3.1 Service Hours ...................................................................................................... 22 4.3.2 Equipment Turn Time and Dwell Time .............................................................. 22 4.4 Train Consists ................................................................................................................... 22 4.4.1 Emerging Train Consist Technology .................................................................. 23 5.0 Future Daily Train Movements at Los Angeles Union Station .................................................... 25 6.0 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 27 7.0 References ..................................................................................................................................... 29 FIGURES Figure 1-1. Project Study Area ...................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 1-2. Existing Los Angeles Union Station Track and Platform Layout .............................................. 7 Figure 1-3. Major Project Components ..................................................................................................... 11 TABLES Table 4-1. Train Consist by Operator ......................................................................................................... 23 Table 5-1. Existing (2016) and Future Daily Train Movements ................................................................ 25 APPENDICES Appendix A: Existing Metrolink and Amtrak Train Schedules Appendix B: Metrolink and Amtrak Forecast – Daily and for 6-Hour AM/PM Peak for 2026, 2031, and 2040 1-)~ ©Metro i Link Union Station January 2019 Rail Planning Technical Memorandum ACRONYMS Caltrans California Department of Transportation CHSRA California High-Speed Rail Authority FRA Federal Railroad Administration HSR High-Speed Rail LAUS Los Angeles Union Station Link US Link Union Station LOSSAN Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo Metro Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority project Link Union Station project SCORE Southern California Optimized Rail Expansion SCRRA Southern California Regional Rail Authority TIRCP Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program 1-)~ ©Metro ii Link Union Station January 2019 Rail Planning Technical Memorandum 1.0 Introduction The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) are proposing the Link Union Station project (Link US or project) to transform Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS) from a “stub-end tracks station” into a “run-through tracks station” with a new passenger concourse that would improve the efficiency of the station and accommodate future growth and transportation demands in the region. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide an estimate of daily train movements (i.e., train counts) for all Metrolink, Pacific Surfliner, Amtrak, and High-Speed Rail (HSR) trains that are planned to pass through LAUS for 2016 and future horizon years anticipated to be considered in the Link US environmental documentation (20261, 2031, and 2040). Improvements to the Gold Line and/or Regional Connector are not considered in this memorandum. Although both Gold Line and the Regional Connector light rail trains will use LAUS, all operational aspects and train movements through LAUS are addressed through separate Metro documentation2. The information contained within this memorandum was prepared solely to provide a conservative estimate of the number of trains planned to pass through LAUS to facilitate evaluation of potential localized traffic, air quality and noise and vibration impacts that may result from project-related capacity enhancements proposed at LAUS and in the surrounding area in the Link US environmental documentation. The environmental impacts resulting from increased train activity at LAUS is addressed in the Link US Draft Environmental Impact Report (HDR 2019). The information contained within this memorandum represents an estimate of future train movements through LAUS to provide a basis for the environmental evaluation only, and is not intended in any way to indicate future rail operational scenarios or stakeholder consensus on future service levels for shared train operations at LAUS. The findings from ongoing operational analyses, if significantly different from the estimated service levels described in this memorandum, could be incorporated into the environmental documentation at a later date at the discretion of the lead agencies. 1.1 Project Background and Concurrent Operational Analysis 1.1.1 Project Background In parallel with project implementation, the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) is currently developing the Southern California Optimized Rail Expansion (SCORE) Program, a $10 billion plan that identifies the need for substantial investments in rail infrastructure in the Southern California region to upgrade the Metrolink system and meet the current and future needs of the traveling public. The project is 1 The 2026 horizon year was added to reflect Metrolink’s growth plans under Phase 1 of the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program; although the ability of LAUS to accommodate increased off-peak services during construction has not been tested. 2 Regional Connector Transit Corridor, Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, Metro 2012 1-)~ ©Metro 1 Link Union Station January 2019 Rail Planning Technical Memorandum a critical component of the SCORE Program, providing capacity enhancements to fulfill the program objectives. Localized environmental impacts resulting from project-related infrastructure improvements and forecasted increases in train movements at LAUS will be evaluated in the Link US environmental documentation. The Link US project operational scenarios for 2026, 2031, and 2040 are influenced by statewide and regional plans for service increases and other required off-site infrastructure (i.e., SCORE program). The operational scenarios represent a conservative estimate of the forecasted increases in regional/intercity rail trips and new HSR train trips that could occur at LAUS. Infrastructure improvements outside of the project study area that are required to implement system-wide efficiencies and changes in regional/intercity operations from implementation of the SCORE Program are not part of the project, and are the responsibility of Southern California Regional Rail Authority and other agency partners. Furthermore, the operational aspects of the planned HSR system and the associated environmental impacts are not evaluated in the Link US environmental documentation because operation of the planned HSR system and the associated impacts are addressed separately in the environmental documentation being prepared by the FRA and California High-Speed Rail Authority for the Burbank to Los Angeles and Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Sections. 1.1.2 Concurrent Operational Analysis Although general operational planning information and background data
Recommended publications
  • Master HSIPR Selection Sheet 030413 Updates.Xlsx
    FRA High‐Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Program Updated 3/4/2013 Funding Selection Summary (Sorted by State Abbreviation, Funding Source, and Project Type) Funding Potential Estimated State Project Type Project Name Project Summary Source Funding* Alabama ‐ Total Funding Amount: $200,000 AL FY 2009 Planning Project New Passenger Rail Service in Alabama Completion of a feasibility study to restore intercity passenger rail service from Birmingham to Montgomery to Mobile, AL.$ 200,000 Amtrak ‐ Total Funding Amount: $449,944,000 This project will boost capacity, reliability, and speed in one of the most heavily used sections of the Northeast Corridor (NEC). The project will create a 24 mile segment of track between New Brunswick and Trenton, NJ capable of 160 mph train operations with high‐tension catenary, upgraded electric Amtrak ARRA Corridor Program NEC Power, Signal, Track, Catenary Improvements power facilities, and high‐speed rail interlockings that allow express trains to overtake and pass local trains, reducing delays that often affect this track $ 449,944,000 section. In addition, this project makes related track and interlocking investments between Trenton, NJ and Morrisville, PA and at New York Penn Station. The upgraded power facilities will reduce power failures, which are frequently experienced on this segment of the NEC. California ‐ Total Funding Amount: $4,243,143,231 This project encompasses the purchase of 15 passenger rail cars and 4 locomotives for use on the Pacific Surfliner, San Joaquin, and Capitol Corridors in California. These new cars and locomotives will be compliant with standards for equipment that can travel at speeds up to 125 mph established Next Generation Passenger Rail Equipment CA ‐ DOT ARRA Corridor Program pursuant to Section 305 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Surfliner-San Luis Obispo-San Diego-October282019
    PACIFIC SURFLINER® PACIFIC SURFLINER® SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO Effective October 28, 2019 Effective October 28, 2019 ® ® SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA VENTURA - LOS ANGELES VENTURA - LOS ANGELES ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO and intermediate stations and intermediate stations Including Including CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES connecting connecting NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Amtrak.com Amtrak.com Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. page 2 PACIFIC SURFLINER - Southbound Train Number u 5804 5818 562 1564 564 1566 566 768 572 1572 774 Normal Days of Operation u Daily Daily Daily SaSuHo Mo-Fr SaSuHo Mo-Fr Daily Mo-Fr SaSuHo Daily 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Also Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Not Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y On Board Service u låO låO låO låO låO l å O l å O l å O l å O Mile Symbol q SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA –Cal Poly 0 >v Dp b3 45A –Amtrak Station mC ∑w- b4 00A l6 55A Grover Beach, CA 12 >w- b4 25A 7 15A Santa Maria, CA–IHOP® 24 >w b4 40A Guadalupe-Santa Maria, CA 25 >w- 7 31A Lompoc-Surf Station, CA 51 > 8 05A Lompoc, CA–Visitors Center 67 >w Solvang, CA 68 >w b5 15A Buellton, CA–Opp.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations
    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • TROLLEY EXTENSION May Do So Using Any of the Following Methods: Post Until 3/12/2021
    Proposed Major The MTS Board of Directors will also hold a Public Hearing in March 2021 to consider these proposals, Take Service Changes prior to approval of any major service changes. If you wish One to comment on any proposal for the Public Hearing, you TROLLEY EXTENSION may do so using any of the following methods: Post Until 3/12/2021 In Fall 2021, the UC San Diego Blue Line light rail • Testimony at the • Our website, extension will open and expand the San Diego sdmts.com/Trolley-Extension Trolley system from Downtown San Diego to PUBLIC HEARING: the UTC Transit Center, serving nine new Trolley Thursday, March 11, 2021, Please use the comment form UC SAN DIEGO UC San DiegoExecutive DriveUTC stations. Health La Jolla 9:00 a.m. UC San Diego See box below. • U.S. Mail. Send to: MTS is also proposing to change the bus network Central Campus MTS Public Hearing Comments to connect people and communities to the Trolley VA Medical Center extension. Extensive rider and public outreach Blue Line • Telephone Hotline: 1255 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000, was conducted in 2018-2019 to collect ideas and Nobel Drive (619) 595-4912 feedback on potential changes.. The results of that (leave your comments as a San Diego, CA 92101 outreach, combined with detailed data analysis, Balboa Avenue resulted in the proposals detailed in this Take One. message on the voicemail) Clairemont Drive IN SUMMARY: • E-Mail: [email protected] • Current bus routes affected would include: Tecolote Road Routes 8, 9, 27, 30, 44, 50, 105, 150, and Green Line 201/202.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego's North Shore
    San Diego’s North Shore The Classic California Beach Community Happenings Year-round Events, Festivals and Celebrations Surf & Sand Family Adventures on the Beach and in the Waves Rooms with a View The Best Vacation and Weekend Getaway Accommodations And Much More… Oceanside Convention and Visitors Bureau 2012 VISITORS GUIDE Save your money for the amusement parks. When you’re traveling with family, the costs add up. But on Amtrak CaliforniaSM trains, up to two kids, ages 2-15, can ride at 50% off for each adult rail fare purchased. On the Pacific Surfliner®, you can relax, skip the traffic and enjoy snacks and beverages in the Café Car. Also, surf online with our complimentary Wi-Fi®. Reserve your trip today and save at AmtrakCalifornia.com or call 1-800-USA-RAIL. Up to two children, ages 2-15, are eligible to receive a 50% discount on the lowest available adult rail fare purchased on most Amtrak trains. AmtrakConnectSM Wi-Fi® service may not be available in all areas at all times. Fares, routes, schedules and services are subject to change without notice. Other restrictions may apply. The term Wi-Fi® is a registered mark of the Wi-Fi Alliance®. Amtrak and Pacific Surfliner are service marks of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Amtrak California and AmtrakCalifornia.com are services of the California Department of Transportation. Experience Downtown Oceanside Shop, Play, Stay! Discover Downtown! 84 square blocks with over 200 shops, Located just one and a half blocks from 34 restaurants, 2 live theatres, 2 museums, the Oceanside Pier, Asylum Surf is a 16 screen Cineplex, and the longest wood high quality surf shop dedicated to out- pier on the West Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Triennial On-Site Security Review of San Diego Metropolitan Transit System
    2018 TRIENNIAL ON-SITE SECURITY REVIEW OF SAN DIEGO METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM RAIL TRANSIT SAFETY BRANCH RAIL SAFETY DIVISION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 September 27, 2018 Final Report Daren Gilbert, Program Manager Rail Transit Safety Branch Rail Safety Division 2018 TRIENNIAL ON-SITE SECURITY REVIEW SAN DIEGO METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The California Public Utilities Commission’s Rail Transit Safety Branch (RTSB) conducted this system security program review. Staff members directly responsible for conducting security review and inspection activities include: Daren Gilbert – Rail Transit Safety Branch Manager Stephen Artus – Program and Project Supervisor Noel Takahara – Senior Utilities Engineer Joey Bigornia – Utilities Engineer Rupa Shitole – Utilities Engineer Michael Warren – Utilities Engineer i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 2 3. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 3 Scope of Security Review ................................................................................................ 3 SDTI Rail System .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    People Before Freight On-time trains on host railroads 3 LATEST REPORT CARD SIGNALS NEW GOLDEN AGE OF ON-TIME TRAINS 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF A 3 Union Pacific A 4 CSX A 5 Canadian National A 6 Norfolk Southern A Average grade for all host railroads: A 4 Amtrak National Network Passengers Continue to Experience Poor On-Time Performance 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF B 3 Union Pacific B- 4 CSX B- 5 Canadian National D- 6 Norfolk Southern F Average grade for all host railroads: C 5 Grading National Network routes on OTP 17 of 28 State-Supported Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time State‐Supported Trains Route Host Railroads within 15 minutes Pass = 80% on‐time Hiawatha CP 96% Keystone (other hosts) 91% Capitol Corridor UP 89% New York ‐ Albany (other hosts) 89% Carl Sandburg / Illinois Zephyr BNSF 88% Ethan Allen Express CP 87% PASS Pere Marquette CSX, NS 84% Missouri River Runner UP 83% Springfield Shuttles (other hosts) 82% Downeaster (other hosts) 81% Hoosier State CSX 80% Pacific Surfliner BNSF, UP 78% Lincoln Service CN, UP 76% Blue Water NS, CN 75% Roanoke NS 75% Piedmont NS 74% Richmond / Newport News / Norfolk CSX, NS 74% San Joaquins BNSF, UP 73% Pennsylvanian NS 71% Adirondack CN, CP 70% FAIL New York ‐ Niagara Falls CSX 70% Vermonter (other hosts) 67% Cascades BNSF, UP 64% Maple Leaf CSX 64% Wolverine NS, CN 60% Heartland Flyer BNSF 58% Carolinian CSX, NS 51% Illini / Saluki CN 37% 6 Grading National Network routes on OTP 14 of 15 Long Distance Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time Long
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Surfliner® San Luis Obispo - Los Angeles - San Diego
    PACIFIC SURFLINER® SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO Effective September 4, 2017 ® SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA VENTURA - LOS ANGELES ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO and intermediate stations CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES connecting NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Amtrak.com Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. NRPC Form W31–Internet only–9/4/17. Schedules subject to change without notice. page 2 PACIFIC SURFLINER - Southbound Train Number 5804 5818 562 564 1566 566 768 572 Normal Days of Operation Daily Daily Daily Daily SaSuHo Mo-Fr Daily Daily Will Also Operate Will Not Operate B y B y B y B y B y B y RR On Board Service l å O l å O l å O l å O l å O l å O Mile Symbol SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA –Cal Poly 0 >v Dp b3 40A –Amtrak Station ⅥC ∑w- b3 50A Grover Beach, CA 12 >w- b4 15A Santa Maria, CA–IHOP 24 >w b4 40A Guadalupe-Santa Maria, CA 25 >w- Lompoc-Surf Station, CA 51 > Lompoc, CA–Visitors Center 67 >w Solvang, CA 68 >w b5 15A Buellton, CA–Opposite Burger King 72 >v b5 20A Goleta, CA 110 >v- 6 35A SANTA BARBARA, CA 119 ∑w- Ar b$£6 30A Dpp l6 49A Carpinteria, CA 129 >w- 7 04A Ventura, CA 145 >w- 7 29A Oxnard, CA 155 ∑w- $¢ $¢ l7 43A Camarillo, CA 165 >w $¢ $¢ 7 54A Moorpark, CA 175 >v $¢ $¢ 8 08A Simi Valley, CA 186 >v $¢ $¢ 8 23A Chatsworth, CA 194 >v $¢ $¢ 8 40A Van Nuys, CA–Amtrak Station 203 ∑w- $¢ $¢ l8 56A Burbank-Bob Hope Airport, CA p
    [Show full text]
  • Host Railroad Report Card &
    Host Railroad Report Card & FAQ 1) What is a “host railroad”? Most of Amtrak’s network is on tracks owned, maintained, and dispatched by highly-profitable freight railroads, known as “host” railroads where Amtrak uses their tracks. Most of the trains on these rail lines are the freight railroads’ own freight trains. Because the freight railroads make all dispatching decisions about which trains have priority in using the rail line, the freight railroads have a tremendous amount of influence over Amtrak’s operations on their lines. Prior to Amtrak’s creation in 1971, the privately-owned railroads had a common carrier obligation to operate passenger trains themselves – an obligation that dated back to when the railroads were built in the 1800s. Because the railroads were losing money on their passenger trains, Congress created Amtrak and relieved the private railroads of their obligation to operate passenger trains. A very important part of the deal was that Amtrak would still have access to the railroads’ lines in order to operate passenger trains. Every year Amtrak pays host railroads $142 million for using their tracks and other resources needed to operate Amtrak trains. 2) What distinguishes hosts with good Amtrak performance? Hosts typically achieve good Amtrak performance through a combination of: a) Commitment to providing quality service for Amtrak’s passengers, b) An active partnership with Amtrak, where both sides work cooperatively and the hosts respect Federal law which protects the rights of our nation’s passengers, and c) A well-disciplined operation that benefits both Amtrak and freight customers alike. 3) What does “Delays per 10,000 train miles” mean? It is a measure of how much delay each host railroad causes to Amtrak trains.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Upda
    TRANSIT UPDA TES Santee Town Transit Center, via the exten• sion and its 4 new stations One more under-the-radar addition to the Orange Line: 12th & Imperial Transit MTA June'2005 Service Changes: the can- Center to Gillespie Field station (formerly celled "last train" on the Metro Green Line called Weld Blvd.) was replaced with new b~s Line 622. ThE7 Special Event Service: Gaslamp Quarter ~22 stops at or near stations between AVla- to Qualcomm Stadium. Replaces former tlon and Norwalk. Green Line special event service train 'Wasting no time, the advertising lVs are Some of the related bus changes: already beginning to appear on MTA buses. th Route 1 eastern terminal to 70 St. Trol- The updated, we-mean-it-this-time list of ley station MTA December 2005 Service Change pro- Route 13 re-route to Grantville Trolley posals is online at http://metro.netfboard/ Station, with new north/east terminal at Items/2005/06_June/200506090therSecto 73rd/EI Cajon. Mission Valley portion part rGCItem7.pdf. Public hearings for the MTA of a new Route 14 December 2005 Service Changes: Route 40 re-route to Grantville Trolley SAN GABRIEL VALLEY SERVICE SECTOR Station August 9th, 6.~00 PM Route 81 discontinued, due to duplication SGV Sector Office with new6reen Line and other existing bus routes. Service along Camino del Rio North 3369 Santa Anita Ave., EI Monte and South to be covered by new Route 18 WESTSIDE/CENTRAL SERVICE SECTOR Route 876 extended north to serve 70th August 11th, 6:00 PM St. and Grossmont stations Route 936 northern terminal to 70th St.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillcrest Mission Valley
    ONE-WAY FARES / Tarifas Sencillas DIRECTORY / Directorio Exact fare, please / Favor de pagar la cantidad exacta 511 MTS Information & Trip Planning Adult / Adulto $2.50 or/ó MTS Información y planeo de viaje Senior/Disabled/Medicare* (619) 233-3004 Personas Mayores/con Discapacidades/Medicare* $1.25 (619) 234-5005 TTY/TDD (teletype for hearing impaired) Youth (ages 6-18)* or/ó $2.50 Teletipo para sordos Jóvenes (edades 6-18)* (888) 722-4889 DAY PASS (Regional) / Pase diario (Regional) InfoExpress Adult / Adulto $6.00 (24-hour info via Touch-Tone phone) (619) 685-4900 Información las 24 horas (via teléfono de teclas) Senior/Disabled/Medicare* $3.00 Personas Mayores/con Discapacidades/Medicare* Customer Service / Suggestions (619) 557-4555 Youth (ages 6-18)* Servicio al cliente / Sugerencias Jóvenes (edades 6-18)* $3.00 MTS Security (619) 595-4960 MONTHLY PASSES / Pases mensuales MTS Seguridad Adult / Adulto $72.00 Lost & Found (619) 233-3004 Senior/Disabled/Medicare* Objetos extraviados Personas Mayores/con Discapacidades/Medicare* $23.00 Youth (ages 6-18)* (619) 234-1060 Jóvenes (edades 6-18)* $23.00 Transit Store 12th & Imperial Transit Center M–F 8am–5pm *Proof of eligibility required. Senior Eligibility: Age 65+ or born on or before September 1, 1959. *Se requiere verifi cación de elegibilidad. Elegibilidad para Personas Mayores: Edad 65+ o For MTS online trip planning nacido en o antes del 1 de septiembre, 1959. sdmts.com Planifi cación de viajes por Internet COMPASS CARDS / Tarjeta Compass There is a $2 charge for Compass Cards, which can be reloaded for future use. For more information on riding MTS services, pick up a Rider’s Hay un costo de $2 por la tarjeta Compass Card, la cual puede ser Guide on a bus or at the Transit Store, or visit sdmts.com.
    [Show full text]