DOCSLIB.ORG

Page 1 SU Cor490-46 2014- 82 Qimmiq Nauja Bay Wellington Bay

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Page 1 SU Cor490-46 2014- 82 Qimmiq Nauja Bay Wellington Bay 729 Polaris Mine Storm ine 701 vik M anisi 728 N n 700 Borde e Min iver ry R Ma 850 ᑕᑯᒋᐊᕐᓂᖅ 2014-ᒥ e Lak vo ᓄᓇᕗᑦ Bra 848 ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᒐᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᕿᓂᕐᓂᖅ, ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓄᓇᓐᖑᐊᓕᐅᖅᑐᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᒻᒪᕆᒃᑯᑦ 849 . y y I a iq t wle m i Ro B im a a Q tr Bay j S oster h u W Ova F eac a yok P a aloyoak ll B N e ark TP ri T Ha ll (M o . t in t. Pelly) t King ce I trai g ic or se S to Ca Garry Bay r F Dea n mbri V William Rasmussen e Ai B ᑭᕙᓪᓕᖅdge B ᓄᓇᖓᓂ inc ay Pr ay Island s Oro 100°W 90°W Parry Bay80°W harle uk C r Bay Gjoa Haven Kugaar nd verne 100 Basin ittee Isla Ta Que Storis Passage Comm en M 1 au s I. High d G Wale Cop Lak ulf perm e ine R Kivalliq Region Bay iver 103 E CLE Ha OX CIR UE mm 188 75 37.5 0 75 150 F TIC TIQ er ARC RC Ulu SIN LE A 233 227 BA ERC Queen Kilometres C Maud Gulf q H ilaluga ood R MBS Q 760 iver Bath Projection: Canada Lambert Conformal Conic, NAD 83 Bowman Bay iak Hoo urst idl d Inlet 462 se Bay Ch 2 129 189 Repul Jeri cho M Izo 104 ine k La 248 ilaq ke 232 101 Q Lupi 220 Finnie Bay n Mi P 761 ne River Ukkusiksalik N It F 6 chen 102 ox Lak 221 ck W e e 234 Ba Amer Lake a C q ge h jua r Ba a allik 698 ruq y n M Beverly C Ama 463 n TP PMA d el 520 Kiggavik North n u 5 Wis Nanuq set hbone Thelon Basin o or 699 S D ine ape Meadowbank M e N C y Turqa 523 PTO our sbur vik m THAM arb Sali Aberdeen L eyhound o SOU ral H d ake Gr c o n l C S la ND B Is Thelon 521 q e ISLA ay M WS 671 677 ujaarvik TP ivalli st B 3, 8 Aber Inu K W Ea deen ham 676 s S ing 670 Lake e t r 674 669 Baker arry ou Not e o H t v h i Kiggavik 678 Ba R ons Ba nd R South 675 ker Lake Gibb Isla r y e Inuit Owned Lands D v Kig a BS i gavik Luxx ly y M R Ba Mallery Lake Nutaaq 673 sin y rc 547 Baker Ba e 461 let M Agnico-Eagle Option rfield In n Cheste s o r d l 4 e o e na v Kahu G h i Dubaw f ats T nt gaarjuup Co R 460 Iqalu o l Lake dine anse Ferguson Lake Melia 524 Nunanga TP y Island M 639 Ba and Qamanirjuaq let Isl t Angila Rankin In n k LAS MA 672 AT CP w R Yathky 400 RB a obin ed 549 Pistol Bay b 546 zan 525 u Ka Lake D 544 AN Whale Cove 545 F13 548 Nowyak 579 South Henik Maguse River Lake Arviat Povungnituk Bay Thle 60°N wiaza McConnell River MBS Kiyuk River 522 7 60°N N BAY HUDSO Commodity Groupings Areas with Surface and/or Boundaries SON Subsurface Restrictions NLCA1 NunUavuDt Settlement Area Base Metals Nickel-Copper PGE E D' H Diamond Rare Earth Elements CPMA -Caribou Protection BAI Nunavut Regions Measures Apply NILCA 2 Nunavik Settlement Area Gold Uranium MBS -Migratory Bird Sanctuary MANITOBA Iron NP -National Park Provincial / Territorial NWA -National Wildlife Area Active Mine Inactive Mine TP -Territorial Park Transportation Routes WP -Wildlife Preserve Symbol with no fill means INACTIVE. Meadowbank Road WS -Wildlife Sanctuary Meliadine Road Bold project number and name signifies Milne Inlet Tote Road Geological Mapping Programs major or advancing project. Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Yellowknife-Contwoyto Winter Road nlet aig I Office Proposed Bathurst Inlet Port and Road H Inuit Owned Lands (Fee simple title) 877 Surface Only Proposed Izok Corridor Road Proposed Steensby Inlet Rail Line er Surface and Subsurface LEGEND Belch 1NLCA The Nunavut Land Claims Agreement nds 2 NILCA The Nunavik Inuit Land Claims Agreement Isla 100°W 90°W http://cngo.ca/exploration-overview/2014/ ᑭᕙᓪᓕᖅ ᓄᓇᖓᓂ ᑭᕙᓪᓕᖅ ᓄᓇᖓᓂᒃ ᓄᓇᓐᖑᐊᓕᐅᕐᓂᖅ ᐃᒧᖃᑦᑕᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓱᕋᑦᑎᔪᓂ. ᑕᒪᓐᓇ ᐅᔭᕋᖑᖅᐊᓪᓕᐊᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᖄᓗᒃᑖᖓ ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ ᖃᓕᖅᓯᒪᔪᖅ ᑲᓇᑕᐅᑉ ᐅᔭᕋᐃᓐᓇᒃᑎᐊᖓ, ᑕᐃᑲᓂᓗ ᓄᓇ ᐱᑕᖃᖅᖢᓂ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᓲᕐᓗ ᒍᓗ, ᓯᐅᕗ, ᓂᑯ, ᐅᒡᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ ᑳᐳ. ᐃᓚᖏᑦ ᓄᑕᐅᓐᖏᓂᖅᐹᑦ ᐅᔭᖃᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᓇᓂᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪ. ᐅᑯᐊ ᐅᔭᖃᑦ ᐊᖏᓛᑦᑎᐊᖅ ᓄᓇᖓ ᓄᓇᕐᔪᐊᒦᑦᑐᖅ ᑕᐃᒪᓐᓇᐃᓕᓂᑯ ᐅᐊᑎᐊᕉᓕᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐃᓚᖃᖅᑐᑦ ᐅᔭᖃᑦ ᓯᐅᕋᐳᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᔪᑦ, ᐃᒪᕐᒥᐅᑕᕕᓂᑦ ᐅᔭᖃᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓄᐊᑦᑎᕕᐅᖑᔭᖅᖢᓂ ᐃᔾᔪᖅᑎᓪᖢᑎᒃ ᐅᔭᖃᑦ ᐃᒪᕐᒥᐅᑕᕕᓃᑦ ᖃᖓᓂ ᐃᑯᐊᓚᔪᐊᓗᐃᑦ ᐅᔭᖃᑦ ᑕᐃᒪᓐᓇ ᐋᕿᒃᓂᑰᔪᑦ ᓄᓇᕐᔪᐊᖅ ᐱᒋᐊᓕᓵᕐᑎᓪᓗᒍ, ᐃᒻᒪᑲᓪᓚᓂᑕᒻᒪᕆᐋᓗᒃ ᐅᔭᕌᓗᒃ ᐱᓇᖕᓇᖓᓂ ᐊᕕᒃᑐᖅᓯᒪᔪᖓᓂ. ᑕᐃᓱᒪᓂ ᓄᓇᕐᔪᐊᖅ ᐋᕿᒃᑲᒥ (ᖃᓂᒋᔮᓂ 1.5 ᐱᓕᐊᓐ ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑦ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᖑᖃᑦᑕᖅᑐᖅ ᑭᖑᓂᐊᒍᑦ ᑖᒃᑯᐊ ᐃᒪᕐᒥᐅᑕᕕᓃᑦ ᐅᔭᖃᑦ ᐊᓂᒍᖅᓯᒪᓕᖅᑐᑦ). ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ, ᐅᑯᐊ ᐅᔭᖃᓃᖃᑕᐅᓕᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᖃᖓᓂ ᑲᑎᑦᑎᕆᒑᖓᑕ ᓄᖑᑦᑐᐃᑦᑐᓂᒃ ᐊᑕᐅᓯᕐᒦᓪᖢᑎᒃ, ᑕᐃᒪᓐᓇᐃᑑᔪᖅ ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᐅᔭᖃᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐅᔭᖃᓂᑦ ᐃᑯᐊᓚᔪᓂᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖅ ᐊᐅᒪᔪᖅ ᐆᔭᐅᔭᐃᑦ ᐃᓚᖓᓂ ᓴᓯᑳᑦᓱᐊᓐ. ᖁᐊᖅᑎᑕᒃᓴᐅᓕᖅᑐᑦ ᐅᔭᖃᑦ ᑕᒫᓃᖏᓐᓇᕐᓂᑯᑦ ᐊᒥᓲ; ᐊᕐᑎᓪᓗᒋ ᑭᕙᓪᓕᖅ ᓈᓴᐅᑕ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᔪᖅ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔪᖅ ᐅᑯᓇᖓᑦ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᖕᒪᖔᑦ ᖃᓄᕆᑑᓂᖓ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᖅ 400 ᐊᑦᓚᔅ ᐊᖕᑯᓂᐊ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᑦ ᑯᐊᐳᕇᓴᓐ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ ᑕᐃᒪᓐᔅ ᕿᓕᖅᑐᑦ ᑎᓯᓛᑦ 460 ᑲᕼᐅᓇ ᑕᓐᓂᑎ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᑦ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ 461, 462 ᓚᒃᔅ, ᕿᓚᓗᒐᖅ ᓄᐊᑦ ᐃᐅᓗ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᑦ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ 463 ᓇᓄᖅ ᐱᐅᓕᑯᓕᓐ ᑕᐃᒪᓐᔅ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ ᒍᓗ 520 ᐊᒪᕈᖅ ᐊᖕᓂᒍ ᐃᒍ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᑦ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ 521 ᒍᓕᕼᐊᐅᓐ ᐊᐅᓚ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᓂᕆᔩᑦ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ 522 ᕿᔪᒃ ᐳᓛᔅᐳᑎ ᒍᓗᓂ ᑯᐊᐳᕇᓴᓐ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ 523 ᒥᑐᐸ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᕐᕕᒃ ᐊᖕᓂᒍ ᐃᒍ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᑦ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ 524 ᒥᓕᐊᑏᓐ ᐊᖕᓂᒍ ᐃᒍ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᑦ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ 525 ᐱᔅᑐ ᐸᐃ ᓄᐊᑦᑯᐃᔅ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ 544 – 546 ᐊᖕᖏᑯᓂ ᑕᓯᖅ (ᐊᖕᖏᑯᓂ – 544, F13 – 545, ᐊᑕᒥᐅᓚ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᑦ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓐᖏᑐᖅ ᐅᓚᐸᓐ – 546) 547 ᒪᓗᓕ ᑕᓯᖅ ᐊᑕᒥᐅᓚ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᑦ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓐᖏᑐᖅ 548 ᓇᐅᔭᖅ ᐊᑕᒥᐅᓚ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᑦ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓐᖏᑐᖅ 549 ᕋᐱ ᐊᖕᑯᓂᐊ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᑦ ᑯᐊᐳᕇᓴᓐ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓐᖏᑐᖅ ᑎᓯᔪᖅ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᖅ 579 ᒪᒎᔅ ᑰᒃ ᐅᓕᑦᓯᒫᑦ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᓂᕆᑦ ᑯᐊᕈᕇᓴᓐ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓐᖏᑐᖅ ᓂᑯ-ᑳᐳ 639 ᕗᒍᓴᓐ ᑕᓯᖅ ᑲᓇᑕᐅᑉ ᐅᑭᐅᖅᑕᖅᑐᐊᓂ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓐᖏᑐᖅ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᑎᑦᑎᔪᑦ ᑲᒻᐸᓂ ᐊᔾᔨᐅᓂᖏᑦᑐᑦ ᓄᓇᕐᔪᐊᒥᐅᑕᐃᑦ ᐃᓚᓕᑦ 669 ᓄᑖᖅ ᕗᐊᓚᒻ ᓄᖑᑦᑐᐃᑐᒥᒃ ᑯᐊᐳᕇᓴᓐ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓐᖏᑐᖅ ᓄᐅᑦᑐᐃᑦᑐᖅ 670, 671 ᐊᐳᑏᓐᒪ ᑐᒐᕕᒃ ᑲᒥᑯ ᑯᐊᐳᕇᓴᓐ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ 672 ᐊᖏᓚᖅ ᑭᕙᓪᓕᖅ ᐆᒪᖁᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᑯᐊᐳᕇᓴᓐ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ 673 ᐸᐃᑯ ᐸᐃᓴᓐ ᑭᕙᓪᓕᖅ ᐆᒪᖁᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᑯᐊᐳᕇᓴ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ 674 ᑭᒡᒐᕕᒃ ᐊᓖᕙ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ ᓄᐊᑦ ᑎᓛᓐ (ᐊᖕᓂᒍ ᐃᒍ ᓂᕈᐊᕆᔪᓐᓇᖅᑕᖓ – 675, ᕗᐊᓚᒻ ᓄᖑᑦᑐᐃᑐᒥᒃ ᑯᐊᐳᕇᓴᓐ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᖅ 675 – 678 ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᓄᓇᖁᑎᖏᑦ – 676, ᑭᒡᒐᕕᒃ ᐅᐊᖕᓇᖓ – 677, ᑭᒡᒐᕕᒃ – 678) 698 ᐊᒧ ᑕᓯᖅ ᐊᑕᒥᐅᓚ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕆᐊᑦ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓐᖏᑐᖅ 699 ᓯᓛᓐ ᐸᐃᓴᓐ ᓂᒃᔅᔨᓐ ᐆᒪᖁᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᖅ ᑎᒥᖓ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓐᖏᑐᖅ ᑕᑯᓗᒍ ᓄᓇᓐᖑᐊᖅ ᖃᖓᓂᑦᑐᖅ ᓇᒥᒻᒪᖓᑦ ᐊᐅᒪᔪᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᐅᓚᖏᑦᑐᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᔪᑦ ᕿᑎᕐᒥᐅᑦ ᓄᓇᖓᓂ. ᕿᕐᓂᕐᓂᕐᓴᐅᒧᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᖏᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᒃᑯᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᓪᓚᕆᒃᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ. ᑭᕙᓪᓕᖅ ᓄᓇᖓᓂ ᑕᒪᕐᒥᑦᑎᐊᐸᓗᒃ ᐅᔭᕋᓱᒃᔫᒧᖅ ᐊᕕᒃᑐᖅᓯᒪᔪᖓ ᐱᑕᖃᖅᑑᔮᓐᖏᑦᑐᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᔭᐅᓗᓂ. ᐅᓇ $2.1 ᐱᓕᐊᓐ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᔪᖅ ᑐᒃᓯᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᖅ ᐱᖓᓱᓄᑦ ᐃᔾᔪᓂᖓᑕ ᖄᖓ ᒪᕋᖃᑦᑎᐊᖅᑐᖅ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓯᐅᕋᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᑎᑭᓪᓗᒍ ᑎᓴᒪᓄᑦ ᐊᕐᕌᒍᓄᑦ ᓴᓇᔭᐅᓗᓂ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕐᑯᒃᓴᖅ, 14 ᐆᒪᓂᐊᖅᑐᖅ ᐃᖃᖓᖓᓂᕐᒥᐅᑕᕕᓂᕐᓂᒃ ᕿᒪᒃᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᓯᕐᒥᖕᓂᑦ ᐊᓯᐅᔭᕌᖓᑕ. ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕐᕕᐅᔪᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ, ᐊᒻᒪᓗ 10 ᐊᕐᕌᒍ ᒪᑐᕙᓪᓕᐊᓕᕐᓗᓂ, ᓇᓂᔭᒃᓴᐅᖕᓂᔪᑦ ᑎᓯᓂᖅᓴᐅᔪᑦ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᐃᑦ, ᑕᒪᒃᑯᐊ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᐱᔨᑦᑎᕋᖅᑕᐅᔪᓐᓃᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᓗᓂ, ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᒥᐊᓂᕆᐅᕕᖃᕐᒥᓗᓂ. ᐅᓇ ᐃᓚᖃᖅᑐᑦ ᑎᓯᓂᖅᐹᓂᒃ ᕿᓪᓕᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᑕᐃᒪᓐᔅ, ᐅᑯᐊᓗ ᓇᓂᔭᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᖅ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕐᕕᒃ ᓇᐸᖅᑕᐅᓇᓱᔨᓗᓂ ᓱᕐᕌᓂᖃᕐᓂᐊᖅᑐᖅ ᐱᑕᖃᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᐊᖅᑐᖅ ᐃᖃᖓᓂᕐᒥᐅᑕᕕᓂᕐᓂᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓇᓂᔭᐅᕙᒃᑐᑦ ᐃᓚᖏᓪᓗᒍ ᐅᔭᕋᓱᒡᔪᐃᑦ. 750 ᓴᓇᔨᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᐊᓕᕈᓂ, ᐃᖅᑲᓇᐃᔭᕐᑎᑦᑎᓗᓂ 600- ᓄᓇᒥ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᖢᒍ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᖓᑕᓲᒃᑯᑦ ᑎᖕᒥᓲᒃᑯᑦ ᓄᓇᖓ ᓂᒃ. ᐱᔭᕇᕈᑏᑦ ᓇᓚᒃᑐᑦ ᑐᒃᓯᕋᐅᑎᑦ ᐃᓂᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᒫᔾᔨ 2015-ᒥ. ᓄᓇᓐᖑᐊᓕᐊᕆᓪᓗᒍ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᖢᒍ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᓄᑦ ᓇᓂᓯᓂᐊᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᓕᕐᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᐱᔭᕇᕈᑎᒃ ᐃᓄᓕᒫᓂᒃ ᓈᓚᒋᐊᖅᓯᒪᓗᑎᒃ, ᐊᓖᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐃᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᑭᓱᑐᐃᓐᓇᐃᑦ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᐃᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑕᐃᒪᔅ. ᕿᓂᖅᑐᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᕐᑎᑦᑎᓗᑎᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᑎᑦᑎᖃᑦᑕᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᖃᒪᓂᑦᑐᐊᕐᒥ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᒍᓗᒥᒃ ᐃᒻᒪᖄ ᕿᓂᖅᖢᖑ ᐅᔭᖃᑦ ᐱᑕᖃᐅᕋᑎᒃ ᕿᓪᓕᖅᑑᑎᓂᒃ ᐊᓕᒎᔭᓂᒃ ᐃᒡᓗᓕᒑᕐᔪᖕᒥ ᑕᐃᑲᓂ 2014 ᑐᑭᓯᓂᐊᕐᒪᑕ ᖃᓄᖅ ᐊᔾᔨᒌᓐᖏᑑᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᕙᑖᓂ ᑕᖃᓖᑦ ᐅᒡᔭᓘᓐᓃᑦ ᑲᔪᖅᑎᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᓯᓚᒦᖏᓐᓇᕋᒥᒃ. ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᒻᒪᕆᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ. ᓂᕈᕆᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐱᓕᕆᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᓕᑕᐅᓇᓱᒃᑐᑦ ᕿᓂᖅᑐᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᓯᒪᖏᑦ ᓴᓇᖑᐊᒐᒃᓴᓖ ᖃᐅᔨᔭᐅᓇᓱᑦᑎᐊᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᐱᓕᕆᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᐊᖕᓂᒍ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕐᑏᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᖓ ᐊᐳᑎᓐᓇᖅᑑᖅ ᒍᓗᒥᒃ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ, ᐅᑯᐊ ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ ᓴᓇᖑᐊᒐᒃᓴᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓇᓱᐊᖅᑕᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐃᓂᖓ 80 ᑭᓚᒦᑕ ᖃᒪᓂᑦᑐᐊᖅ. ᐅᓇ ᑲᒻᐸᓂ ᐃᖅᑲᓇᐃᔭᕐᑎᑦᑎᔪᖅ 700 ᐱᓕᕆᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᑎᐅᓕᓕᑐᐊᓕᒥ ᑲᑐᑎᔭᖓᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᔪᖅ, ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕐᕕᖕᒥ, ᐅᑯᐊᓗ 35% ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥᐅᑕᐃᑦ ᓇᑭᑐᐃᓐᓇᖅ ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥᑦ. ᓯᕗᓕᐅᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᖅ ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᒐᕙᒪᒃᑯᖏᓐᓂᑦ ᑮᓇᐅᔭᑎᒍᑦ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ ᐅᖓᑖᓂ 11,000 ᑕᓐᔅ ᐅᕿᖏᓂᖓ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᖅ ᐱᔭᐅᕙᒃᑐᖅ ᐅᑉᓗᖅ ᐊᑕᐅᓯᖅ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ, ᓇᓂᓯᓇᓱᒡᖢᑎᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᐅᔨᓇᓱᑦᑎᐊᕐᓗᒋᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓂ ᑕᐃᑲ ᐃᓂᖓᓂ ᒫᓐᓇᐅᔪᖅ ᐃᓂᓕᐅᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐱᓂᐊᕐᓂᕐᒥᖕᓂᒃ ᓴᓇᖑᐊᖓᒃᓴᐃᑦ ᐅᔭᖃᑦ, ᖃᐅᔨᓇᓱᑦᑎᐊᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᐊᑑᑎᖃᕐᒪᖔᑕ ᒍᓗᓂᒃ ᑎᑭᓐᓇᓱᖕᓂᖓᓂ 2018. ᐊᖕᓂᒍ ᐃᒍ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᑎᑕᖓᑦᑕᐅᖅ ᓴᓇᖑᐊᒐᒃᓴᐅᓪᓗᑎᒃ, ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓗᒋᑦ ᐱᑕᖃᕐᒪᖔᑕ ᖃᓂᒋᔭᖓᓂ ᐃᔾᔭᓕᒃ ᒥᓕᐊᑕᐃᓐ ᒍᓗᓕᕆᔪ, ᐃᓂᖃᖅᑐᖅ 20 ᓚᒦᑕ ᐅᐊᖕᓇᖓᓄ ᓄᓇᓖᑦ. ᐅᓇ ᐱᓕᕆᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᐱᔭᕇᕈᒫᖅᑐᖅ ᐊᕐᕌᒍ ᓄᓇᒥ ᑭᖏᖅᖠᓂᖅ ᒐᕙᒪᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᓄᓇᖁᑎᖓᓂ. ᑕᐃᑲᓂ 2014, ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᖓ 2014 ᐱᖃᑖᓂ ᐳᓛᕐᓗᒍ ᓇᐅᔮᑦ, ᑕᐃᑲᓂᓗ ᐊᖏᔪᑦ ᑲᒻᐸᓂᖓᑦ ᖃᑭᒐᓱᐊᕈᑎᓕᐅᓚᐅᖅᑐᖅ $42 ᒥᓕᐊᓐ ᕿᓂᕈᑎᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓴᓇᖑᐊᒐᒃᓴᖅ Kovic serpentinite ᐱᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᐃᓂᖓᓂ. ᑕᐃᒪᓗ, 20 ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᒋᓂᐊᖅᑕᖓ ᓄᓇᖓᓂ, ᑕᒪᒃᑯᐊᓗ ᐱᐅᓯᕚᓪᓕᕐᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᓴᓇᖑᐊᒐᒃᓴᓕᖕᓂ ᐱᑕᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ. ᖃᖓᑐᐃᓐᓇᒃᑯᑦ ᓯᓚᒥ ᐊᖁᑎᑦ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔪ ᖃᖏᕐᖠᓂᕐᒥᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐅᖓᑖᓄᑦ ᓄᓇᐅᑉ ᐃᓗᐊᓄᑦ ᐃᓯᕆᐊᕐᕕᐊᓄᑦ. ᐅᖓᑖᓂ 35,000 ᒦᑕ ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᕿᓂᖅᑐᑦ ᓂᐅᖅᑐᖅᖢᒍ ᓄᓇᖓ ᑎᑭᐅᑎᓯᒪᓪᓗᒍ ᕿᓂᖅᑕᑎᒃ ᒍᓗ ᐱᔭᕆᐅᖅᓴᑎᑎᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓇᓂᓯᔪᒪᓪᓗᑎᒃ ᓄᑖᓂᒃ ᑐᕌᕈᒪᔭᒥᖕᓂᒃ. ᐊᖕᓂᒍ ᐃᒍ ᒫᓐᓇᐅᔪᖅ ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑕᒫᑦ, ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᒐᕙᒪᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᔪᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᖕᖏᖅᑕᐅᓵᖅᑐᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᔪᓐᓇᖅᑎᑕᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕈᓐᓇᖅᖢᑎᒃ ᓄᓇᖓ ᑐᓂᓯᓯᒪᕙᒃᑐᑦ 6 ᐅᑉᓗᓄ ᐱᔭᕆᐅᖅᓴᐅᑎᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᕐᓂᕐᒥᒃ ᐊᒥᓱᓄᑦ ᑕᐃᒪᓗ ᑭᓯᐊᓂ ᒪᓕᒋᐊᖃᕐᓗᑎᒃ. ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᐱᒋᐊᕋᔭᖅᑐᖅ 2019-ᒥ. ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓄᑦ ᓇᓂᑐᐃᓐᓇᖅ ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ. ᐃᓱᓕᑦᑎᔪᑦ ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᕈᑎᒥᖕᓂᒃ ᐆᒃᑐᕈᓐᓇᖅᑐᑦ ᑮᓇᐅ.ᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᕈᑎᒃᓴᒥᖕᓄᑦ ᐃᑲᔫᑎᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᖃᓂᕆᔮᓂ 35 ᑭᓚᒦᑕ ᑎᑭᕋᕐᔪᐊᖅ, ᓄᐊᑦᑯᐃᔅ ᑎᒥᖓ ᕿᓂᖅᑐᑦ ᒍᓗᒥᒃ ᑕᒪᐅᓐᓇ ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᖅᑐᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᓂᐊᕐᒪᑕ ᑕᐃᑲᓂ ᐊᐅᐸᓗᒃᑐᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᔪᑦ ᐅᓄᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᖅᓯᐊᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ. ᓇᖕᒥᓂᖅ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᓯᐅᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᐅᒡᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ ᓇᓂᓯᓗᑎᒃ ᓴᓇᕕᒃᓴᒥᖕᓄᑦ ᑕᐃᑲᓂ 2014, ᑲᒻᐸᓂᖓ ᖃᑭᒐᓱᐊᕈᑎᓕᐅᓚᐅᖅᑐᖅ $7.6 ᒥᓕᐊᓐ ᓄᓇᒥ ᐃᑲᔪᕐᑎᐅᓂᐊᕐᓗᓂ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᒐᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᕿᓂᖅᑐᓂ. ᑕᐃᑲᓂ 2015, ᑎᖕᒥᓲᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᖓᑕᔪᓂᑦ ᓄᓇᓐᖑᐊᓕᐊᖑᓪᓗᓂ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐱᓕᕆᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᔭᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᖅ ᖃᒪᓂᑦᑐᐊᕐᒥ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑲᖏᕐᖠᓂᕐᒥ. ᐅᖓᑖ 4,500 ᒦᑕ ᑕᐃᒪᓐᔅᓂ ᓂᐅᖅᑐᖅᖢᑎᒃ. ᑕᑯᒃᓴᐅᔪᖅ ᒍᓗ ᐅᓄᖅᑐᓂ ˙ᑖᓐᓇ ᓂᐅᖅᑐᖅᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᕿᓂᕈᐊᖅᖢᒍ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎᑖᖅ, ᓇᓗᓇᐃᓚᐅᖅᑐᖅ ᓄᓇᒥᒃ ᓄᓇᓐᖑᐊᓕᐅᕐᓂᖅ ᐃᓕᑕᐅᓇᓱᒃᑐᑦ ᐱᐅᓛᖑᓂᖓᓂᒃ ᒎᓗ ᑕᐃᑲᓂ ᓄᓇᖓᓂ. ᐊᑑᑎᓕᒻᒪᕇᑦ ᑕᐃᒪᓐᔅ ᐅᔭᖃᓃᑦᑐᑦ ᐱᓇᖕᓇᖓᓂ ᓴᓪᓖᑦ, ᑲᓇᑕ -ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᓄᓇᓐᖑᐊᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᕐᕕᖓ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓇᓂᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐃᒡᓗᓕᒑᕐᔪᒃ, ᐅᒃᑯᓯᒃᓴᓕᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓇᐅᔮᑦ ᑕᐃᒪᖓᓂ ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᒐᕙᒪᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓇᓱᒃᑐᑦ ᐊᖏᔪᓄᑦ ᑲᒻᐸᓂᐅᔪᓂᑦ ᓴᓇᕐᕈᑕᐅᔪᓄᑦ ᐊᓂᒍᖅᑐᓂ ᐊᕐᕌᒍᓂ ᐊᒥᓲᓕᖅᑐᓂ. ᐅᓇ ᕿᓚᓗᒐᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᔪᖅ ᖁᐊᖅᑎᑕᒃᓴᐅᔪᑦ ᐃᒡᓗᓕᐊᖑᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑦ ᐅᔭᖃᑦ ᑕᐅᓇᓂ ᓴᓪᓖᑦ. ᐋᕿᐅᑎᔪᑦ ᐃᓂᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᖃᓂᒋᔮᓂ 9 ᑭᓚᒦᑕᔅ ᓇᐅᔮᓂᑦ. ᑕᐃᑲᓂ 2014, ᓄᐊᑦ ᐃᐅᓗ ᑕᒪᑐᒪᖓᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᔪᓂ ᑐᓂᓯᓯᒪᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᑎᑦᑎᓗᑎᒃ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕐᑎᑦ ᓄᐊᑦᑎᓚᐅᖅᑐᖅ 1,500 ᑕᓐᔅ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎᒃᓴᒥᖕᓂᒃ ᖃᓄᕆᑑᓂᖓ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐱᐅᓂᖓᓂ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᑕᖅᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᕐᓗᓂ ᐊᑐᐃᓐᓇᐅᔪᖅ. ᐊᐅᓪᓚᕐᑎᑕᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᖃᓪᓗᓈᑦ ᓄᓇᖓᓄ ᐱᓕᕆᔭᐅᓂᐊᕐᒪᑕ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᐅᔨᔭᐅᓇᓱᑦᑎᐊᕐᓗᓂ ᐃᓱᒪᒃᓴᖅᓯᐅᕐᓂᐊᕐᒪᑕ ᐱᒋᐊᕈᑎᒋᔪᓐᓇᕐᒪᖔᑦ ᐊᕐᕕᐊᑦ ᐱᔭᕆᐅᖅᓴᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᑕᐃᒪᓐᔅ ᕿᓚᓗᒐᕐᒥ. ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᔪᓂ ᖃᐅᔨᔭᐅᔪᑦ, ᓂᕆᐅᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᑕᐃᒪᖓᓂᑦ 2011 ᑕᒪᔾᔭᑑᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᑕᐃᒪᓐᓂ ᓂᐅᖅᑐᕐᓂᖅ ᑕᐃᑲᓂ 2015, ᐃᓚᖃᕋᔭᖅᑐᖅ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᑎᑕᐅᑲᓐᓂᕐᓗᓂ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᔪᖅ ᐱᔭᕆᐅᖅᓴᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᖅ, ᐅᓄᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᓯᖏᑦ ᐱᔭᕆᐅᖅᓴᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᑮᓇᐅᔭᖅᑖᕐᕕᐅᔪᓐᓇᕈᓂ. ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᑎᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐱᓇᓱᐊᖃᑎᒌᔅᓗᑎᒃ ᐊᕙᑖᓂᑦ ᑕᐊᒻᓚᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᕐᕕᐊᑦ, ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕐᑎᑦ ᑲᒻᐸᓂᐅᔪᑦ, ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᒐᕙᒪᒃᑯᑦ, ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᓯᖏᑦ. ᑕᐃᒪᖓᓂᑦ, ᐅᓇ ᑭᒡᒐᕕᒃ ᓄᖑᑦᑐᐃᑦᑐᓂᒃ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ, ᖃᓂᒋᔮᓂ ᐱᓇᖕᓇᖓᑕ ᐱᔭᕆᐅᖅᓴᑎᑦᑎᔪᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᐊᕐᕕᐊᓂ ᐃᓚᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᒪᕐᕈᖕᓂ ᐊᐅᒃᑎᑦᑎᔨᑦ ᖃᒪᓂᑦᑐᐊᖅ, ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᐊᓖᕙᒃᑯᓂᑦ ᑲᓇᑕ ᑎᒥᖓ. ᐅᓇ ᓴᕕᖃᔭᖕᓂᒃ ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᕈᑕᐅᔪᑦ, ᒪᕐᕉᒃ ᐃᓕᓐᓂᕐᕕᐅᔪᑦ ᐳᓪᓚᓕᖕᓂᒃ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᑦᑎᐊᖅᓯᒪᓂᖅᐸᐅᔪᖅ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᓄᖑᑦᑐᐃᑦᑐᒥᒃ ᓄᓇᕗᒻᒥ ᓄᓇᒥᐅᑎᓂᒃ ᐊᖁᑕᕆᐅᖅᓴᓂᖅ, ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᕙᒃᑐᑦ ᔮᓄᐊᕆ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᓂᒋᔮᓂ ᐱᕙᒃᑐᖅ ᐅᖓᑖᓂ 133 ᒥᐊᓐ ᐸᐅᓐᔅ ᓄᖑᑦᑐᐃᑦᑐᖅ. ᓄᕕᐱᕆ, ᒪᕐᕉᒃ ᓴᓇᔪᓐᓇᖅᓯᓂᐊᕐᒪᑕ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᕆᐊᖃᖅᑕᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᕿᓂᖅᑐᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᑕᐃᑲᓂ 2014 ᐱᓚᐅᖅᑐᑦ ᐅᖓᑖᓂ 11,000 ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᖅᑎᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓄᓇᐊᑉ ᖃᖓᓂ ᑕᐃᒪᓐ ᓂᐅᖅᑐᕐᓂᖅ ᒦᑕᔅ ᕿᓂᖅᑐᑦ ᓂᐅᖅᑐᖅᖢᑎᒃ ᑎᑭᐅᑎᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᒧᑦ ᐊᒥᓲᔪᑦ ᐃᑲᔪᖅᑎᒃᓴᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᕈᑎ. ᑲᑎᓪᖢᒋᑦ 65 ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᐱᔭᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑦ ᓄᓇᖓ. ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑖ ᐃᓚᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᑎᓴᒪᓂᒃ ᐱᔭᕇᖅᓯᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᑕᒪᒃᑯᓂᖓ ᐱᓕᕆᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᓂᒃ 2014-ᒥ, ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᕿᓂᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᐊᑐᖅᓯᓗᑎᒃ ᑐᐃᖓᔪᒥᒃ ᓄᓇᐅᑉ ᐊᔪᕈᓐᓃᕐᑎᑦᑎᖃᑦᑕᖅᑐᑦ ᑲᑎᓪᖢᒋᑦ 118 ᐃᓱᓕᑦᑎᔪᑦ ᑕᐃᒪᖓᓂᑦ ᑎᓴᒪᑦ ᖃᖓᓂ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑕᓪᓕᒪᖓᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᓄᓇᐅᑉ ᐃᓗᐊᓂ ᐊᕐᕌᒍᓂᑦ.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NUNAVUT a 100 , 101 H Ackett R Iver , Wishbone Xstrata Zinc Canada R Ye C Lve Coal T Rto Nickel-Copper-PGE 102, 103 H Igh Lake , Izo K Lake M M G Resources Inc
    150°W 140°W 130°W 120°W 110°W 100°W 90°W 80°W 70°W 60°W 50°W 40°W 30°W PROJECTS BY REGION Note: Bold project number and name signifies major or advancing project. AR CT KITIKMEOT REGION 8 I 0 C LEGEND ° O N umber P ro ject Operato r N O C C E Commodity Groupings ÉA AN B A SE M ET A LS Mineral Exploration, Mining and Geoscience N Base Metals Iron NUNAVUT A 100 , 101 H ackett R iver , Wishbone Xstrata Zinc Canada R Ye C lve Coal T rto Nickel-Copper-PGE 102, 103 H igh Lake , Izo k Lake M M G Resources Inc. I n B P Q ay q N Diamond Active Projects 2012 U paa Rare Earth Elements 104 Hood M M G Resources Inc. E inir utt Gold Uranium 0 50 100 200 300 S Q D IA M ON D S t D i a Active Mine Inactive Mine 160 Hammer Stornoway Diamond Corporation N H r Kilometres T t A S L E 161 Jericho M ine Shear Diamonds Ltd. S B s Bold project number and name signifies major I e Projection: Canada Lambert Conformal Conic, NAD 83 A r D or advancing project. GOLD IS a N H L ay N A 220, 221 B ack R iver (Geo rge Lake - 220, Go o se Lake - 221) Sabina Gold & Silver Corp. T dhild B É Au N L Areas with Surface and/or Subsurface Restrictions E - a PRODUCED BY: B n N ) Committee Bay (Anuri-Raven - 222, Four Hills-Cop - 223, Inuk - E s E E A e ER t K CPMA Caribou Protection Measures Apply 222 - 226 North Country Gold Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • 198 13. Repulse Bay. This Is an Important Summer Area for Seals
    198 13. Repulse Bay. This is an important summer area for seals (Canadian Wildlife Service 1972) and a primary seal-hunting area for Repulse Bay. 14. Roes Welcome Sound. This is an important concentration area for ringed seals and an important hunting area for Repulse Bay. Marine traffic, materials staging, and construction of the crossing could displace seals or degrade their habitat. 15. Southampton-Coats Island. The southern coastal area of Southampton Island is an important concentration area for ringed seals and is the primary ringed and bearded seal hunting area for the Coral Harbour Inuit. Fisher and Evans Straits and all coasts of Coats Island are important seal-hunting areas in late summer and early fall. Marine traffic, materials staging, and construction of the crossing could displace seals or degrade their habitat. 16.7.2 Communities Affected Communities that could be affected by impacts on seal populations are Resolute and, to a lesser degree, Spence Bay, Chesterfield Inlet, and Gjoa Haven. Effects on Arctic Bay would be minor. Coral Harbour and Repulse Bay could be affected if the Quebec route were chosen. Seal meat makes up the most important part of the diet in Resolute, Spence Bay, Coral Harbour, Repulse Bay, and Arctic Bay. It is a secondary, but still important food in Chesterfield Inlet and Gjoa Haven. Seal skins are an important source of income for Spence Bay, Resolute, Coral Harbour, Repulse Bay, and Arctic Bay and a less important income source for Chesterfield Inlet and Gjoa Haven. 16.7.3 Data Gaps Major data gaps concerning impacts on seal populations are: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Data Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2262
    Scientific Excellence • Resource Protection & Conservation • Benefits for Canadians Excellence scientifique • Protection et conservation des ressources • Bénéfices aux Canadiens DFO Lib ary MPO B bhotheque Ill 11 11 11 12022686 11 A Review of the Status and Harvests of Fish, Invertebrate, and Marine Mammal Stocks in the Nunavut Settlement Area D.B. Stewart Central and Arctic Region Department of Fisheries and Oceans Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N6 1994 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2262 . 51( P_ .3 AS-5 -- I__2,7 Fisheries Pêches 1+1 1+1and Oceans et Océans CanaclUi ILIIM Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Manuscript reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which deals with national or regional problems. Distribu- tion is restricted to institutions or individuals located in particular regions of Canada. However, no restriction is placed on subject matter, and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Manuscript reports may be cited as full-publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts and,indexed in the Department's annual index to scientific and technical publications. Numbers 1-900 in this series were issued as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Biological Board of Canada, and subsequent to 1937 when the name of the Board was changed by Act of Parliament, as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 901-1425 were issued as Manuscript Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Ernest C. Oberholtzer (1884- 1977)
    250 ARCTIC PROFILES Ernest C. Oberholtzer (1884- 1977) It was a hazardous undertaking for you to go through that northern country withone Indian who knew nothing ofit. .and I heartily congratulate youon having mude a good adventurous journey which will add materiallyto our knowledge of thatpor- tion ofNorthem Canada. (J.B. Tyrrell to E.C. Oberholtzer, 16 November 1912.) In 1912 Ernest C. Oberholtzer and Titapeshwewitan, an On- tario Ojibwa better known as Billy Magee, made a canoe voyage of some 3200 km, during which they explored Nueltin Lake and the Thlewiaza River, N.W.T. This epic journey, more arduous and commendable than certain of the acclaimed explorations that preceded it, has remained all but unrecorded to the present day. Oberholtzer was born in Davenport, Iowa, on 6 February 1884. At 17 he contracted rheumatic fever and was instructed by doctors to never indulge in any activity involvingstrain. He attended Harvard, taking his A .B. in 1907 and returning for a year’s study of landscape architecture under Frederick Law Olmstead. But his one insatiable yearning was for the north woods, and he spent the summers of 1908-09 along the then still largely pristine Minnesota-Ontario border, traversing, with local Indians, “all the main canoe routes in the Rainy Lake watershed.” It was there that he first canoed prodigious- ly and began a lifelong friendship with “the most wonderful England to write and lecture on the Indians and wildlife of the Ojibway or anyIndian I have ever known,” Billy Magee, southern Shield. Oberholtzer did so; on one memorable occa- whose tribal name meant “Far-distantecho.” sion, as alast-minute substitute for the celebrated Central Asia 1910 found Oberholtzer visiting Europe and England.
    [Show full text]
  • Following the Oberholtzer-Magee Expedition, by David F. Pelly
    246 • REVIEWS Yoo, J.C., and D’Odorico, P. 2002. Trends and fluctuations in the likely caribou crossings and waited, the Dene [Chipewyan] dates of ice break-up of lakes and rivers in northern Europe: The were more inclined to simply follow the caribou in their effect of the North Atlantic Oscillation. Journal of Hydrology migration, not unlike a pack of wolves” (p. 64). The hostil- 268:100–112. ity between them made it difficult for anyone to find a guide Zhang, X., Vincent, L.A., Hogg, W.D., and Niitsoo, A. 2000. to conduct him through the territory. Temperature and precipitation trends in Canada during the Pelly does a kind of time-travel through the history of the 20th century. Atmosphere-Ocean 38:395–429. area, going back to the time of Samuel Hearne in the 18th century and up to the descriptions of Bill Layman, who is Thomas Huntington still canoeing the area today. The narrative ranges from the Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences mid-19th century, when the Roman Catholic mission was 180 McKown Point Rd. established in the village of Brochet at the head of Reindeer West Boothbay Harbor, Maine 04575, USA Lake, to the travels of American P.G. Downes, who in 1939 [email protected] covered some of the same route traveled by Oberholtzer and Magee 27 years earlier. Pelly traces centuries of nomadic movement of the Chipewyan, the Inuit, and the Cree as they The Old Way North: following the Ober- followed the caribou across the land, sometimes in co-op- holtzer-Magee expedition.
    [Show full text]
  • NTI IIBA for Conservation Areas Cultural Heritage and Interpretative
    NTI IIBA for Phase I: Cultural Heritage Resources Conservation Areas Report Cultural Heritage Area: McConnell River and Interpretative Migratory Bird Sanctuary Materials Study Prepared for Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. 1 May 2011 This Cultural Heritage Report: McConnell River Migratory Bird Sanctuary (Arviat) is part of a set of studies and a database produced for Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. as part of the project: NTI IIBA for Conservation Areas, Cultural Resources Inventory and Interpretative Materials Study Inquiries concerning this project and the report should be addressed to: David Kunuk Director of Implementation Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. 3rd Floor, Igluvut Bldg. P.O. Box 638 Iqaluit, Nunavut X0A 0H0 E: [email protected] T: (867) 975‐4900 Project Manager, Consulting Team: Julie Harris Contentworks Inc. 137 Second Avenue, Suite 1 Ottawa, ON K1S 2H4 Tel: (613) 730‐4059 Email: [email protected] Cultural Heritage Report: McConnell River Migratory Bird Sanctuary (Arviat) Authors: Philip Goldring, Consultant: Historian and Heritage/Place Names Specialist (primary author) Julie Harris, Contentworks Inc.: Heritage Specialist and Historian Nicole Brandon, Consultant: Archaeologist Luke Suluk, Consultant: Inuit Cultural Specialist/Archaeologist Frances Okatsiak, Consultant: Collections Researcher Note on Place Names: The current official names of places are used here except in direct quotations from historical documents. Throughout the document Arviat refers to the settlement established in the 1950s and previously known as Eskimo Point. Names of
    [Show full text]
  • River Ice Breakup, Edited by Spyros Beltaos
    244 • REVIEWS A final criticism concerns the incompleteness of the bib- a substantial body of knowledge that had been published liography. At many places, McGoogan quotes from books in a wide assortment of conference proceedings, technical by members of Kane’s second expedition, including Robert reports, scientific journal articles, and books and to identify Goodfellow, Hans Hendrick, Christopher Hicky, and Amos key gaps in current knowledge. Bonsall, but not one of these works appears in the bibliog- The book attempts to bridge the gap between earlier, raphy. Admittedly this is termed a “Select Bibliography,” largely empirical, approaches to studying river ice breakup but it certainly ought to contain all the works from which and more recent theoretical approaches, with emphasis on McGoogan has quoted. prediction. The theoretical approach uses quantitative appli- In short, while the uncritical reader may perhaps find cation of the thermodynamics of heat transfer, hydrology, this “a good read,” the discerning reader will soon detect hydraulics, and ice mechanics. Beltaos acknowledges both that this biography has been rather carelessly researched. the complexity of predicting these processes and the typical lack of detailed information on channel geometry, bathym- etry, stream bed slope and tortuosity, hydraulics, and REFERENCES hydrology, which require a balance between using quan- titative approaches and applying qualitative or empirical Blake, E.V., ed. 1874. Arctic experiences: Containing Capt. relations. Engineers and water resource managers will find George E. Tyson’s wonderful drift on the ice-floe, a history of many examples of how to apply quantitative approaches the Polaris expedition, the cruise of the Tigress and rescue of using approximations or empirical relations to estimate req- the Polaris survivors.
    [Show full text]
  • Nunavut-Manitoba Route Selection Study: Final Report
    NISHI-KHON/SNCLAVALIN November 14, 2007 BY EMAIL Kivalliq Inuit Association P.O. Box 340 Rankin Inlet, NU X0C 0G0 016259-30RA Attention: Melodie Sammurtok, Project Manager Dear Ms. Sammurtok: Re: Nunavut-Manitoba Route Selection Study: Final Report We are pleased to submit the final documentation of the Nunavut-Manitoba Route Selection Study as a concluding deliverable of this two-year multi-disciplinary study. An electronic copy of the Final Report is submitted initially via email. One hard-copy report will be subsequently provided to each member of the Project Working Group, along with a CD containing the electronic copies of the Final and Milestone Reports, along with all the associated Appendices. On behalf of the Nishi-Khon/SNC-Lavlin Consultant Team, we would like to thank you, members of the Project Working Group and the Project Steering Committee, for your guidance and valuable contributions to this study. It has been our pleasure to work with KIA, Nunavut, Manitoba and Transport Canada on this challenging project. We look forward to continuing working with you over the next few years on the business case development, more detailed engineering and environmental studies necessary to bring this important project to fruition. Yours truly, SNCLAVALIN INC. Tim Stevens, P. Eng. Project Manager Enclosures DISTRIBUTION LIST Project Steering Committee: Methusalah Kunuk Assistant Deputy Minister, Transportation, Nunavut Department of Economic Development & Transportation Tongola Sandy President, Kivalliq Inuit Association John Spacek Assistant
    [Show full text]
  • Taiga Shield Ecozone Kazan River Upland Ecoregion Taiga Shield Ecozone the Taiga Shield Ecozone Lies on Either Side of Hudson Bay
    Terrestrial Ecozones, Ecoregions, and Ecodistricts of Manitoba An Ecological Stratification of Manitoba’s Natural Landscapes Research Branch Technical Bulletin 1998-9E R.E. Smith, H. Veldhuis, G.F. Mills, R.G. Eilers, W.R. Fraser, and G.W. Lelyk Land Resource Unit Brandon Research Centre, Research Branch Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Taiga Shield Ecozone Kazan River Upland Ecoregion Taiga Shield Ecozone The Taiga Shield Ecozone lies on either side of Hudson Bay. The eastern segment occupies the central part of Quebec and Labrador, and the western seg- ment occupies portions of north- ern Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and the south-eastern area of the continental North- west Territories, and the south- ern part of Nunavut. Character- istic of the zone are the open and often stunted conifer dominated forests, and the Precambrian shield with its shallow soils and many lakes. Climate The ecoclimate of the ecozone is classified as Subarctic, is a common occurrence in summer, especially in areas which is characterized by relatively short summers with with the stronger continental climate conditions. prolonged daylight, and long, very cold winters. Mean annual temperature in the area west of Hudson Bay is as Mean annual precipitation ranges from 200 to 500 mm low as -9.0oC, but it ranges from -1oC to -5oC in Quebec west of Hudson Bay, while east of Hudson Bay it ranges and Labrador, with some areas in Labrador having mean from 500 to 800 mm, to over 1000 mm locally along the annual temperatures as high as 1oC. A few degrees of frost Labrador coast. Selected Climate Data1 (Annual Means) for the Taiga Shield Ecozone Temperature Precipitation Degree Days Frost Free Period Station (oC) (>5oC) (days) Rain(mm) Snow(cm) Total(mm) Brochet A -4.9 261.8 167.5 427.1 952.0 97.0 Ennadai Lake -9.3 173.7 117.1 266.7 595.0 78.0 Uranium City A -3.5 204.9 197.9 344.8 1111.0 106.0 Yellowknife A -5.4 150.2 135.4 266.7 1027.0 111.0 1 Canadian Climate Normals, 1951-1980.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 – SEAL WATERSHED .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2 - THLEWIAZA WATERSHED ................................................................................................................................. 5 3 - GEILLINI WATERSHED ....................................................................................................................................... 7 4 - THA-ANNE WATERSHED .................................................................................................................................... 8 5 - THELON WATERSHED ........................................................................................................................................ 9 6 - DUBAWNT WATERSHED .................................................................................................................................. 11 7 - KAZAN WATERSHED ........................................................................................................................................ 13 8 - BAKER LAKE WATERSHED ............................................................................................................................. 15 9 - QUOICH WATERSHED ....................................................................................................................................... 17 10 - CHESTERFIELD INLET WATERSHED ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide
    Canada Map / Selected Features of Physical Geography Map No. 50 ISBN: 978-2-89157-171-5 PRODUCT NO.: 401 1276 Washable: We strongly recommend the use of Crayola water-soluble markers. Bands and hooks 122 cm × 94 cm / 48 in × 37 in Other markers may damage your maps. 170° 160° 150° 140° 130° 120° 110° 100° 90° 80° 70° 60° 50° 40° 30° 20° 10° 170° 160° 150° 140° 130° 120° 110° 100° 90° 80° 70° 60° 50° 40° 30° 20° 10° RUSSIAN TCHOUKOTKA FEDERATION The Base Map [RUSSIAN FEDERATION] Inset Map: CANADA AND ITS LANDFORMS Canada Today ICELAND • Contours and outlines are The Physiographic Bering Strait Lake Hazen Arctic Ocean carefully stylized to capture DENMARK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Regions Ellesmere Island 60° North Magnetic Pole Map No. 50 November 2003 GREENLAND 60° the essentials. Easy to read CANADA (Kalaallit Nunaat) [DENMARK] and user-friendly. selected features of physical geography • The seven physiographic Meighen Island Nares Strait regions are clearly represented Borden Island Amund Axel Ringnes Heiberg Ellef Island by seven bands of colour with Ringnes Island Pacific Atlantic Island Ocean Ocean Mackenzie King Island Prince Patrick Island well-dened contours. Arctic Ocean Lougheed Island Cornwall Island A rc Labrador Sea tic P Queen Elizabeth a O c ce Arctic Circle if a 50° ic n D Islands O ra Eglinton Island Graham Island 50° ce in Y an ag Cameron Island uk D e Hudson Bay on ra B in as a in ge B R as iv in Melville e r Island Coburg Island Bathurst 60° Island 60° Byam Martin Island Baffin Bay K ALASKA Cornwallis Devon Island Geographic Relief [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] Beaufort Sea Island Po rc Banks Island up E in Sachs e Harbour Parry Channel R iver Legend Stefansson Island Parry Channel Cordilleran Region ukon Interior Plains Y • Identies all essential elements.
    [Show full text]
  • A Second Expedition Through the Barren Lands of Northern Canada Author(S): J
    A Second Expedition through the Barren Lands of Northern Canada Author(s): J. Burr Tyrrell Source: The Geographical Journal, Vol. 6, No. 5 (Nov., 1895), pp. 438-448 Published by: geographicalj Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1773980 Accessed: 25-06-2016 02:34 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Wiley, The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Geographical Journal This content downloaded from 132.236.27.111 on Sat, 25 Jun 2016 02:34:40 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 438 A SECOND EXPEDITION THPtOUGH THE official language now is Spanish, but it is for that very reason I think the history so extremely interestin. I have been endeavourinffl to draw attention to the neeessity of its study, as soon we shall be losing all those threads which will enable us to make the study of the Wlesican past eSeetual. I am sure the studJr of the lanCuaCes would do a Creat deal to elueidate the very question just asked. If tile eazisting independent tribes in Mexieo eould be studied separately, and somethinC ascertained about their separate languages, their separate etlstoms, and identifiea- tion established between them and those to the north or the south, I thinli tllere is a great field for inquiry whieh would have extremelJr remarkable results.
    [Show full text]