INDONESIA Essays on Agricultural Institutions and Policy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INDONESIA Essays on Agricultural Institutions and Policy 37413 Public Disclosure Authorized INDONESIA Public Disclosure Authorized Essays on Agricultural Institutions and Policy Public Disclosure Authorized June 24, 1999 Public Disclosure Authorized Rural Development and Natural Resources East Asia and Pacific Region ii CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (As of June 1, 1999) Currency Unit = Rupiah 1 Rupia h = 0.00012 US$ US$1 = 7300 Rupiah FISCAL YEAR: 1 January to December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ABN-AMRO - Dutch Bank ACDI/VOCA - BAPPENAS - National Planning and Development Body BGR - BKD - Village Credits Bank BKKBN - National Family Planning Board BRI - People’s Bank of Indonesia BULOG - Food Logistic Authority CIDA - Canadian International Development Agency CFTC - Commodities Future Trading Commissions EBRD - European Bank for Resonstruction and Development EKUIN - Economic, Finance and Industry GDP - Gross Domestic Product GOI - Government of Indonesia ICEB - IDF - International Development Fund IMF - International Monetary Fund KKPA - Credit for Members of Primary Cooperating KKOP - Credit for Food Crop Harvest and Distribution KLBI - Bank Indonesia Liquidity Credits KUD - Village Cooperative KUK - Small-scale Enterprise Credit Program KUPEDES - Village Enterprise Credit Program KUT - Farmer Production Credit LDKP - Lembaga Dana Kredit Pedesaan MOA - Ministry of Agriculture MMT - NGO - Nongovernmental Organization OPK - Rice Subsidy Program PHBK - PKM - Proyek Kredit Mikro RDKK - TPSP - Tempat Pelayanan Simpan Pinjam Undang-Undang Dasar - Law UPGM - USAID - United States Aid Development Program WRS - Warehouse Receipts System WTO - World Trade Organization iii PREFACE The essays contained in this volume were produced by the Rural Development Unit of the East Asia and Pacific Region to provide background information for the continuing policy dialogue between the Government of Indonesia (GOI) and the World Bank. The topics selected are priority sectoral concerns for Indonesia as the government examines reforms needed to revitalize agriculture and the rural sector following the economic and political crisis of 1997-98. Information for the essays was collected by a mission that visited Indonesia in March, 1999. Preliminary findings were discussed with government officials at that time, papers were then completed, reviewed within the Bank, and commented on again by Indonesian officials and academics. The papers were then finalized and put together in this collection. Authors of the papers are: Steven Tabor, consultant, Rice Price Policy and the Restructuring of BULOG; Donald Larson, the World Bank, Alternative Food Security Instruments; Stephen Mink, the World Bank, Rural Credit; Jock Anderson, the World Bank, Agricultural Cooperatives in Indonesia; Ian Gregory, the International Fertilizer Development Center, Fertilizer Policy; and Isabelle Tsakok and Ade Tunis, the World Bank and Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesia, respectively, Commercialization of the Seed Industry. The papers were edited by Phil Sawicki and the work was under the general direction of Malcolm Bale. The authors wish to thank the many officials of the GOI who provided information, detailed explanations, and valuable comments on the papers. In particular, Mmes. Delima Azahari and Ade Tunis, (EKUIN and MOA, respectively) and Mr. Gellwynn Jusuf (BAPPENAS), played a key role in identifying counterparts and in the review of the papers. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. RICE PRICE POLICY AND THE RESTRUCTURING OF BULOG................ 1 Policy Challenges and Constraints..................................................... 2 Farm Income Support......................................................................... 3 Targeted Rice Distribution................................................................. 4 Price Stabilization.............................................................................. 5 Public Stocks...................................................................................... 6 Rice Market Development Policy...................................................... 6 BULOG Restructuring....................................................................... 7 Table 1: Rice Policy: Short and Medium-Term Reform Options 9 Table 2: Rice – Area Harvested, Production, and Yield, 1982-1998.......................................................... 12 Table 3: Food Price, Consumer Price, Exchange Rate and Rice Price in 1998 ...................................................... 13 II. ALTERNATIVE FOOD SECURITY INSTRUMENTS: THE WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS SYSTEM................................................................................... 13 Exchange Delivery............................................................................. 13 Facilitating Trade ..................................................................................... 13 Policy Instrument ..................................................................................... 15 Prospects for Developing a Warehouse Receipts System in Indonesia ..................................................................................... 14 Banks are Interested........................................................................... 14 Intermediaries..................................................................................... 15 Warehouse Management Companies................................................. 15 Farmers’ Practices.............................................................................. 15 Coffee and Cocoa............................................................................... 16 Other Major Crops ............................................................................. 16 The Rice Market in Indonesia ............................................................ 16 Technical Issues ................................................................................. 17 Experience of Other Countries........................................................... 17 Recommendations .............................................................................. 18 III. RURAL CREDIT ....................................................................................... 19 Rural Credit Aggregates During the Crisis........................................ 19 Table 1: Commercial Bank Credits to Agriculture ...................... 21 Subsidized Credit Schemes................................................................ 22 Table 2: Bank Indonesia Rural Credit Programs ......................... 22 Table 3: Subsidy Costs................................................................. 23 Changes in the KUT Program............................................................ 23 Commercial Programs of Rural Credit .............................................. 25 Table 4: Commercial Rural Credit Programs .............................. 25 Table 5: Micro-Credit Programs.................................................. 27 v Page No. Policy Conclusions and Recommendations ....................................... 27 Table: Directions in Rural Credit Policy..................................... 31 Annex 1 – Commercial Banks’ Outstanding Rupiah Credits (Total, Investment, Working Capital) by Group of Bank, Total and Agricultural Sector, in Rp. Billions ............................................. 34 Annex 2 – Commercial Bank’s Outstanding Rupiah Credits (Total, Investment, Working Capital, by Group of Bank, Total and To Agriculture, in Constant Rp. Billions (1996=100) ................. 35 Annex 3 – Agriculture Sector Share of Total Outstanding Rupiah Credits Of Commercial Banks, by Group of Bank................................... 36 IV. AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES IN INDONESIA ..................................... 37 Introduction........................................................................................ 37 Principles of the Cooperative Movement .......................................... 37 Strengths and Weaknesses of Cooperatives....................................... 37 Roles for Government ........................................................................ 38 Recent Institutional Developments .................................................... 38 Cooperatives in Indonesia .................................................................. 38 Operation and Efficiency of KUDs.................................................... 39 Current Directions.............................................................................. 40 Rural Credit Issues............................................................................. 41 Conclusion......................................................................................... 42 V. FERTILIZER .............................................................................................. 43 Fertilizer Consumption...................................................................... 44 Table 1: Indonesia - Domestic Fertilizer Consumption, 1975-1998...................................................................... 45 Fertilizer Production.......................................................................... 44 Table 2: Indonesia - Fertilizer Use on Food Crop Sector Only, 1991-1997...................................................................... 46 Fertilizer Distribution......................................................................... 46 Fertilizer Prices and Subsidies ........................................................... 47 Recent Policy Program....................................................................... 47 Table 3: Indonesia - Ratio of Floor
Recommended publications
  • SYNERGY for Sustainability
    Sustainability Report SYNERGY FOR SUSTAINABILITY PT Pupuk Indonesia (Persero) Kantor Pusat | Head Office Jalan Taman Anggrek, Kemanggisan Jaya, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia Phone (hunting): +62 21 536 54900 Facsimile: +62 21 80647955 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.pupuk-indonesia.com Layanan Informasi | For further information 0800-1-008001 (Toll Free) Sustainability Report SYNERGY FOR SUSTAINABILITY Sustainability Report Sustainability Report SYNERGY FOR SUSTAINABILITY PT Pupuk Indonesia (Persero) www.pupuk-indonesia.com SYNERGY FOR SUSTAINABILITY ustainable development is the The implementation of Sustainability biggest challenge to human Principles requires a synergy in the beings today. Would we be business chain of the Company and able to meet the current needs the stakeholders. We optimize the withoutS diminishing the next generation’s resources, create productive cooperation capability to do the same for their needs? with the communities and partner with This is a fundamental question to us in the government, as well as involving growing the company based on three the stakeholders for the purpose of aspects in Sustainability Principles Profit, sustainability. People, Planet. PT Pupuk Indonesia (Persero) Sustainability Report 1 ABOUT THE REPORT PUPUK INDONESIA LAPORAN DEVELOPING DEVELOPING DEVELOPING DEVELOPING ATTAINING A DEVELOPING DEVELOPING PROFILE KEPADA PEMANGKU SUSTAINABLE STAKEHOLDERS’ COMPETENT HUMAN COMMUNITY HEALTHY WORK EXCELLENT TOP -NOTCH KEPENTINGAN GOVERNANCE ECONOMIES RESOURCES OF WELFARE ATMOSPHERE
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Indonesia in 2008
    2008 Minerals Yearbook INDONESIA U.S. Department of the Interior August 2010 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUS T RY OF INDONESIA By Chin S. Kuo The Government of Indonesia expected the economy to grow Production by 6.1% in 2008, fueled by the global boom in commodity prices and the strong domestic construction sector. Indonesia is Indonesia produced such major mineral commodities as rich in mineral resources, including coal, copper, gold, nickel, bauxite, cement, coal, copper, natural gas, nickel, petroleum, and tin. Other mineral commodities that the country has in and tin in 2008. Production of mined gold and copper decreased significant quantity are bauxite, oil and gas, and silver. The by 45% and 17.8%, respectively, owing to the lower grade ore country’s industrial production came from the cement, metal mined at Grasberg. As a result, the output of refined copper also mining, and oil and gas industries. Indonesia was among the declined. Production of steel and pig iron also decreased by leading five producers of copper and nickel in the world and its 10% and 9.1%, respectively, because of low capacity utilization tin output was ranked second after China. It was also ranked by PT Krakatau Steel. The decrease in the output of mined among the world’s top 10 countries in the production of gold nickel led to decreased production of ferronickel and nickel and natural gas. Indonesia was also one of the leading exporters matte. The output of mined tin and tin metal also decreased by of liquefied natural gas (LNG) (after Qatar) but was a net 19.5% and 16.6%, respectively, owing to the low commodity importer of oil.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Bank
    Documtertof The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. 7851 PROJECT COMPLETIONREPORT Public Disclosure Authorized INDONESIA NATIONAL FERTILIZERDISTRIBUTION PROJECT (LOAN 2120-IND) JUNE 19, 1989 Public Disclosure Authorized Industry and Energy OperationsDivision Public Disclosure Authorized Asia Regional Office Thisdocument has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of theirofficial duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. COUNTRYEXCHANGE RATES Name of Currency (abbreviation) Rupiah (Rp) Appraisal Year Average 1982 US$1 - Rp 625 Intervaning Years' Average 1983-85 US$1 - Rp 862 Completion Year 1986 US$1 - Rp 1,650 Average 1982-86 US$1 - Rp 1,138 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS Fertilizer Companies AAF - PT ASEAN Aceh Fertilizers, Lhokseumawe, Aceh GRESIK - PT Petrokimia Gresik, Gresik, East Java KALTIM - PT Pupuk Kalimantan Timur, Bontang, East Kalimantan PIM - PT Pupuk Iskanda Muda, Lhokseumawe, Aceh PUSRI - PT Pupuk Sriwidjaja, Palembang, South Sumatra Pusri Nomenclature Line I - Point of production or import Line II - In or near port areas Line III - District level (usually storage) Line IV - Retail or village level Fertilizer TSP - Triple superphosphate DAP - Di-ammonium phosphate AS - Ammonium sulphate MOP - Muriate ^f Potash, Potassium Chloride; Potash SOP - Sulphate of Potash, Potassium Sulphate; Potash Others DGSC - Directorate General of Sea Communications dwt - Deadweight of ship, in long tons FMDSS - Fertilizer Marketing and Distribution Strategy Study GOI - Government of Indonesia ISD - Inland Storage Depot (Line III) KUD - Koperasi Unit Desa. (Village Cooperative) mt - million tons MSDP - Maritime Sector Development Plan PJKA - Perusahaan Jawatan Kereta Api. (State Railway Organization) PUSKUD - Head Office for a group of KUDs RLS - Regular Lin;r Services; the Inter-island general cargo shipping system.
    [Show full text]
  • ANALISIS PENGARUH CITRA, KUALITAS LAYANAN DAN KEPUASAN TERHADAP LOYALITAS PELANGGAN (Studi Kasus Pada PT
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Diponegoro University Institutional Repository ANALISIS PENGARUH CITRA, KUALITAS LAYANAN DAN KEPUASAN TERHADAP LOYALITAS PELANGGAN (Studi Kasus pada PT. PUPUK KALIMANTAN TIMUR, Sales Representative Kabupaten Grobogan) TESIS . Diajukan untuk memenuhi syarat guna memperoleh derajad S-2 Magister Manajemen Program Studi Magister Manajemen Universitas Diponegoro Oleh : Joko Sugihartono NIM. C4A006302 PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER MANAJEMEN PROGRAM PASCA SARJANA UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG 2009 HALAMAN MOTTO DAN PERSEMBAHAN MOTTO: Kerjakan yang engkau tahu, nanti Allah SWT memberitahu yang tidak tahu. (Hadits) PERSEMBAHAN: Tulisan ini dipersembahkan untuk Ibunda tercinta Hj. Sumastuti, isteriku terkasih Sri Djumiani, Apt., Msi., saudaraku dan keponakanku. iv PENGESAHAN TESIS Yang bertandatangan dibawah ini menyatakan bahwa tesis berjudul: ANALISIS PENGARUH CITRA, KUALITAS LAYANAN DAN KEPUASAN TERHADAP LOYALITAS PELANGGAN (Studi Kasus pada PT. PUPUK KALIMANTAN TIMUR, Sales Representative Kabupaten Grobogan) Yang disusun oleh Joko Sugihartono, NIM. C4A006302 Telah dipertahankan di depan Dewan Penguji pada tanggal 13 Juni 2009, dan dinyatakan telah memenuhi syarat untuk diterima. Pembimbing Utama Pembimbing Anggota Dr. Syuhada Sofyan, MSIE. Drs. Harry Susanto, MMR Semarang, 13 Juni 2009 Univesitas Diponegoro Semarang Program Pasca Sarjana Program Studi Magister Managemen Ketua Program _______________________________ KATA PENGANTAR Puji syukur Alhamdulillah disampaikan kehadirat Allah SWT atas limpahan rahmad hidayah yang diberikan kepada kita semua. Amin. Karena atas karunia Allah SWT, penulis dapat menyelesaikan penyusunan laporan penelitian ini. Penyusunan tesis ini dimaksudkan untuk memenuhi sebagian persyaratan guna memperoleh derajad sarjana S-2 Magister Manajemen pada Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang. Penulis menyadari bahwa baik dalam pengungkapan, penyajian dan pemilihan kata-kata maupun pembahasan materi tesis ini masih jauh dari sempurna.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Bank
    Documentof The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY /S 32Z?2- /0 Public Disclosure Authorized Reort No. 8333-IND STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT INDONESIA Public Disclosure Authorized FERTILIZER RESTRUCTURINGPROJECT NOVEMBER26, 1990 Public Disclosure Authorized Industry aid Energy OperationsDivision Country DepartmentV Public Disclosure Authorized Asia Region lfhis domnent has a resrcted disribution and may be used by recipients only in theperfomanoe of their offlial duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disdosed whout World Bak aulhoulzioid CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (As of June 1, 1990) Currency Unit = Indonesian Rupiah (Rp) US$1.00 = Rp 1,830 Rp 1 billioni = US$0.546 iilllion WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 1 British Thermal Unit (Btu) = 0.252 Kilocalories (Kcal) 1 Metric ton (t) = 1,000 kilograms (kg) 1 Metric ton (t) = 2,209 pounds (lb) 3 1 Cubic meter (m ) = 35.32 Cubic Feet (cuft) 1 Standard Cubic Foot (SCF) of Natural Gas = 1,000 Btu FISCAL YEAR Government of Indonesia - April 1 - March 31 Fertilizer Companies - January 1 - December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AAF - P.T. ASEAN Aceh Fertilizer APPI - Indonesian Fertilizer Producers' Association AS - Ammonium sulfate ASEAN - Association of South-East Asian Nations BAPPENAS - National Development Planning Board BI - Bank Indonesia BPKP - Financial and Development Supervisory Board BNI - Bank Negara Indonesia 1946 EKUIN - Minister Coordinator for Economics, Financial and Industrial Affairs, and for the Supervision of Development GOI - Government of Indonesia Gresik - P.T. Petrokimia Gresik ICB - International competitive bidding IKPT - P.T. Inti Karya Persada Tehnik Kaltim - P.T. Pupuk Kalimantan Timur KC1 - Muriate of potash, or potash, or potassium chlloride KLH - Ministry of Population and the Environment KONEBA - P.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Pupuk Kaltim)
    BAB II DESKRIPSI OBJEK PENELITIAN 2.1 PT PUPUK KALIMANTAN TIMUR (Pupuk Kaltim) PT Pupuk Kalimantan Timur (Pupuk Kaltim) merupakan anak perusaahaan dari PT Pupuk Indonesia (Persero) yang memproduksi Urea dan Amoniak. Pupuk Urea disebut juga pupuk nitrogen (N) yang memiliki kandungan nitrogen 46%. Urea dibuat dari reaksi antara amoniak dengan karbon dioksida dalam suatu proses kimia menjadi urea padat dalam bentuk prill berukuran 1-3 mm atau granul ukuran 2-4mm yang keduanya diprodukasi oleh Pupuk Kaltim. Urea prill paling bayak digunakan untuk segmen tanaman pangan dan industry, sedangkan urea granul lebih cocok untuk segmen perkebunan, meskipun dapat juga untuk tanaman pangan. Pupuk urea dipasarkan dan di jual dengan merek dagang Daun Buah dan Pupuk Indonesia. Khusus urea bersubsidi dengan merek Pupuk Indonesia, produk urea berwarna pink (Tentang Produk, 2017). Urea Pupuk Indonesia adalah merek yang digunakan khusus untuk pupuk urea bersubsidi, berwarna merah muda (pink) dan diperuntukan ke tanaman pangan. Berbeda dengan urea granul daun buah, adalah merek yang digunakan untuk pupuk urea granul non subsidi produksi Pupuk Kaltim, berwarna putih dengan ukuran butiran 2-4,75mm. Urea prill daun buah adalah merek yang digunakan untuk produk urea prill non subsidi produksi pupuk 37 kaltim, berwarna putih dengan ukuran butiran 1-3,35mm (Tentang Produk, 2017). Amoniak Pupuk Kaltim digunakan sebagai bahan mentah dalam industri kimia. Amoniak produksi Pupuk Kaltim dipasarkan dalam bentuk cair pada suhu -33 derajat celcius dengan kemurnian minimal 99,5% dan campuran (impurity) berupa air maksimal 0,5%. Amoniak dibuat dari bahan baku gas bumi yang direaksikan dengan udara dan uap air yang diproses pada suhu dan tekanan tinggi secara bertahap melalui beberapa reactor yang mengandung katalis (Tentang Produk, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • PENILAIAN EKONOMI EKOSISTEM TERUMBU KARANG DI PERAIRAN BONTANG KOTA BONTANG (Economic Valuation of Coral Reef Ecosystem in Bontang Sea Bontang City)
    EPP.Vo. 7. No.1. 2010 : 20-24 20 PENILAIAN EKONOMI EKOSISTEM TERUMBU KARANG DI PERAIRAN BONTANG KOTA BONTANG (Economic Valuation of Coral Reef Ecosystem in Bontang Sea Bontang City) Erwan Sulistianto Staf Pengajar Jurusan Sosial Ekonomi Perikanan, FPIK-UNMUL e-mail : [email protected] ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to calculate both the total economic value of coral reef ecosystems. In this study the value of coral reef ecosystems expresed by the reef fish farming values were estimated by Effect on Productivity (EOP). The result showed that the reef fish farming value was Rp11,238.80 per hectare per year, these values described if there is damage toward the coral reef ecosystems in Bontang Sea. Key words: the total economic value, coral reef, fish farming. PENDAHULUAN fungsi ekonomi sebagai habitat dari ikan karang, udang karang, algae, teripang, dan Wilayah pesisir merupakan daerah yang kerang mutiara. Terumbu karang juga berfungsi cukup penting di Indonesia. Wilayah Indonesia sebagai tujuan wisata dan penelitian. Kota sebagian besar didominasi oleh lautan, sehingga Bontang merupakan salah satu daerah yang sumberdaya alam yang terdapat di daerah memiliki ekosistem terumbu karang yang cukup pesisir di Indonesia juga melimpah, karena di luas, yaitu sekitar 8.744 ha. Ekosistem terumbu daerah pesisir terdapat lebih dari satu ekosistem. karang tersebar hampir di seluruh bagian pesisir Menurut Kusumastanto (2006), wilayah pesisir dan pulau-pulau Kota Bontang yang pada memiliki konsentrasi-konsentrasi keunggulan umumnya berada dalam radius 1,5 – 2 mil laut wilayah yang tidak dimiliki wilayah lain, yaitu di posisi yang berhadapan dengan pabrik PT (1) keunggulan sumberdaya alam misalnya Pupuk Kalimantan Timur dan PT Badak NGL.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementasi Saluran Distribusi Dan Strategi Pengorganisasian Yang
    IR-PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA BAB II GAMBARAN UMUM PERUSAHAAN 2.1 Sejarah Perusahaan Pupuk Kaltim merupakan Anak Perusahaan dari PT Pupuk Indonesia (Persero). Sejak berdiri, Pupuk Kaltim tidak pernah melakukan perubahan nama Perusahaan. Awalnya, proyek Pupuk Kaltim dikelola oleh perusahaan minyak negara Pertamina dengan fasilitas pabrik pupuk terapung atau pabrik di atas kapal. Namun karena beberapa pertimbangan teknis, proyek tersebut dialihkan ke darat sesuai dengan Keputusan Presiden Nomor 43 Tahun 1975 dan kemudian melalui Keputusan Presiden Nomor 39Tahun 1976, pengelolaannya diserahkan dari Pertamina kepada Departemen Perindustrian. Lahan seluas 443 hektar disiapkan untuk pembangunan proyek tersebut. Gas bumi merupakan bahan baku utama produksi Amoniak dan Urea yang disalurkan dengan pipa sepanjang 60 km dari Muara Badak, Kalimantan Timur. Proyek pertama pembangunan Pabrik 1 dimulai pada 1979, sedangkan pembangunan Pabrik 2 dimulai pada 1982. Kedua pabrik tersebut diresmikan bersamaan pada 29 Oktober 1984. Selanjutnya, Pabrik 3 dibangun dan diresmikan pada 4 April 1989. Pada 1999, berdiri pabrik Urea granul pertama di Indonesia yang dinamakan Proyek Optimasi Kaltim (POPKA). Pabrik ini diresmikan pada 6 Juli 2000 bersamaan dengan pemancangan tiang pertama Pabrik 4. Unit Urea Pabrik 4 diresmikan pada 3 Juli 2002 sedangkan unit Amoniak diresmikan pada 28 Juni 2004. Bisnis utama Perusahaan adalah memproduksi serta menjual Amoniak, Urea dan NPK dengan segmen pasar dalam maupun luar negeri. Untuk wilayah distribusi sektor subsidi dalam negeri, wilayah pemasaran Pupuk Kaltim meliputi 2/3 wilayah Indonesia, yakni Kawasan Timur Indonesia hingga Papua dan sebagian besar Jawa Timur dan Kalimantan, kecuali Kalimantan Barat. Wilayah tersebut ditetapkan sesuai surat Direktur Utama PT Pupuk Indonesia (Persero) Nomor U-1308/A00000.UM/2012 tanggal 8 Oktober 2012 tentang Penugasan Wilayah Tanggung Jawab Pengadaan dan Penyaluran 10 TUGAS AKHIR IMPLEMENTASI SALURAN DISTRIBUSI… NOVALDA FIRDAUZI MR.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Indonesia in 2003
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRIES OF INDONESIA AND EAST TIMOR (TIMOR-LESTE) By Pui-Kwan Tse INDONESIA governments could cause production costs to increase by an additional 6%. During the past 5 years, investment in Despite the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Indonesian mining has decreased by 90% to $200 million outbreak in the Asia and the Pacific region and the August in 2003 compared with $2 billion in 1998. The Capital terrorist attack in the capital, Indonesia’s gross domestic product Investments Coordinating Board approved only seven new (GDP) grew by 4.1% in 2003 compared with that of 2002; this foreign mining projects and two foreign expansion projects rate of growth was higher than the Government’s target of 3.9%. in 2003 for a total value of $14.9 million. Legal and policy Indonesia had not recovered completely from the 1997 financial uncertainties, lingering labor conflicts, and the chaotic crisis. With the assistance of the International Monetary Fund implementation of regional autonomy were mainly responsible and the implementation of new macroeconomic policies, the for this drop in investment in the mining sector. Security inflation rate slowed to 5.1% by yearend, interest rates fell, conditions also worried many foreign investors, especially in the and the rupiah stabilized against the U.S. dollar. Private and Provinces of Aceh and Papua. During the past several years, Government consumption remained the principal drivers of mineral outputs remained stable despite the unfavorable investment growth. Private consumption accounted for 2.8% of the GDP conditions. The continuing lack of investment will have a negative growth.
    [Show full text]
  • PROFIL PERUSAHAAN Company Profile
    LAPORAN MANAJEMEN Management Report II Laporan Tahunan 2018 PT REKAYASA INDUSTRI TEMA ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Theme of the 2018 Annual Report Dinamika ekonomi dan bisnis yang terjadi selama tahun 2018 disikapi PT Rekayasa Industri (selanjutnya disebut “Rekind”) dengan semangat untuk terus meningkatkan kompetensi guna mendukung ekspansi bisnis yang berkelanjutan. Di tahun ini, Rekind berhasil melanjutkan komitmennya untuk menciptakan pertumbuhan usaha yang solid. Selain itu, Rekind juga memegang konsistensinya untuk mengambil peran penting dalam pembangunan nasional melalui sumbangsihnya terhadap penciptaan nilai tambah yang berkesinambungan bagi Perseroan maupun bagi bangsa, namun sekaligus memastikan keberlanjutan usaha Perseroan untuk jangka panjang mengingat perannya yang akan terus meningkat di masa datang. The economic and business dynamics that occurred during 2018 were addressed by PT Rekayasa Industri (Rekind) with the spirit to continue to improve competencies to support its sustainable business expansion. This year, Rekind managed to continue its commitment to create solid business growth. In addition, Rekind also holds its consistency to take an important role in national development through its contribution to the creation of sustainable added value for the Company and for the nation, but at the same time ensuring the sustainability of the Company’s long term business regarding its role that will continue to increase in the future. Menghadapi tahun 2018, Rekind terus berupaya Facing 2018, Rekind continued to seek strategic mencari langkah- langkah strategis, melakukan steps, make efficiency and optimize existing efisiensi dan mengoptimalkan sumber daya resources to maximize the company value. To face yang ada guna memaksimalkan nilai perusahaan. the challenges and realize positive performance, Untuk menghadapi tantangan yang ada serta the Board of Directors has compiled and executed mewujudkan performa yang positif, Direksi telah policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Nurhidayati T. Bab Ii Gambaran Umum
    IR – PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA BAB II GAMBARAN UMUM PERUSAHAAN 2.1 Sejarah Perusahaan 2.1.1 Profil singkat perusahaan PT. Pupuk kaltim : Gambar 2.1 Gambar sejarah singkat PT. Pupuk Kalimantan Timur A. pendirian pabrik B. Pembangunan pertama (1977) pabrik 1 dan 2 pupuk kaltim (1979-1984) D. Pengembangan C. Pembangunan pabrik 3 dan 4 pupuk kaltim Pabrik pupuk kaltim E. Pengoperasian pabrik 5 Sumber : Dokumentasi Pribadi (2020) 8 TUGAS AKHIR EFEKTIVITAS DEMONSTRATION PLOT… NURHIDAYATI T. IR – PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA Berikut merupakan rincian sejarah singkat PT.Pupuk Kalimantan Timur : Gambar 2.2 Bagan sejarah singkat perusahaan A. PT. Pupuk Kalimantan Timur membangun pabrik di atas kapal laut untuk B. Ditemukan sumber gas alam memudahkan pengambilan bahan baku gas yang merupakan bahan baku alam. lalu pemerintah menunjuk Pertamina utama pembuatan pupuk di Muara untuk mengelola proyek tersebut. Karena Badak, sekitar 60 km dari beberapa pertimbangan, pabrik didaratkan Bontang. Lahan seluas 443 ha dan proyek ditangani oleh Departemen dipersiapkan untuk proyek Perindustrian sesuai dengan Keputusan pembangunan. Pabrik 1 dimulai Presiden Nomor 43 Tahun 1975 dan pada 1979, dilanjutkan dengan melalui Keputusan Presiden Nomor 39 Pabrik 2 pada 1982. Kedua pabrik Tahun 1976. diresmikan bersamaan pada 29 Oktober 1984 oleh Presiden C. Pembangunan pabrik masih dilanjutkan Soeharto. lagi dengan proyek Pabrik 3 yang diresmikan pada 4 April 1989. Pada 1999, D. Mengingat keberadaannya yang berdiri pabrik urea granul pertama di sudah lebih dari 30 tahun, Pabrik 1 Indonesia, yaitu POPKA yang merupakan menjadi prioritas utama Perusahaan proyek optimasi pabrik untuk dalam program revitalisasi. Tahun memanfaatkan sisa atau ekses Amoniak 2011 merupakan awal mula dari pabrik yang ada.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities and Challenges in Encountering the Global Situation
    INFORMASI PERUSAHAAN 07 COMPANY INFORMATION PELUANG DAN TANTANGAN MENGHADAPI SITUASI GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN ENCOUNTERING THE GLOBAL SITUATION ISBN 978-602-70441-3-5 PT Pupuk Kalimantan Timur LAPORAN TAHUNAN - 2014 - ANNUAL REPORT A PROFIL PERUSAHAAN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA ANALISA & PEMBAHASAN MANAJEMEN TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN YANG BAIK TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL PERUSAHAAN ANALISA KEUANGAN 01COMPANY PROFILE 02HUMAN RESOURCES PROFILE 03 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION & ANALISYS 04GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 05 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 06 FINANACE ANALISYS PELUANG DAN TANTANGAN MENGHADAPI SITUASI GLOBALOPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN ENCOUNTERING THE GLOBAL SITUATION B LAPORAN TAHUNAN - 2014 - ANNUAL REPORT PT Pupuk Kalimantan Timur INFORMASI PERUSAHAAN 07 COMPANY INFORMATION 2014 merupakan tahun penuh tantangan bagi pelaku bisnis. Fluktuasi perekonomian global serta persaingan bisnis yang semakin ketat menuntut Perusahaan untuk semakin jeli membaca dan memanfaatkan setiap peluang yang ada. Implementasi strategi bisnis yang kami lakukan di tahun ini berhasil menghadapi tantangan bisnis, sekaligus sukses membukukan laba tertinggi sepanjang PELUANG DAN sejarah Perusahaan. Kinerja produksi Perusahaan pada tahun 2014 sangat baik. Produksi urea mencapai 3,02 Juta ton atau 101% dari target yang ditetapkan, sementara amoniak mencapai 2,43 Juta ton atau 111% dari target. Biaya operasional pada tahun 2014 tercatat sebesar Rp13,59 Triliun atau 125% dari tahun TANTANGAN sebelumnya. Sejalan dengan itu, Perusahaan berhasil membukukan pendapatan Rp17,20 Triliun atau 118% dari target, dengan laba Rp3,48 Triliun atau 173% dari target. Pencapaian perusahaan di tahun 2014, menjadi pendorong semangat untuk terus menjadi perusahaan bereputasi prima. Memiliki kejelian MENGHADAPI dalam menangkap peluang dan mengembangkannya menjadi kekuatan untuk menghadapi berbagai tantangan global di masa yang akan datang. 2014 is a challenging year for business doer.
    [Show full text]