DOCSLIB.ORG

Native Communities Citizen Archivist Instructions & Quick Tags3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Native Communities Citizen Archivist Instructions & Quick Tags3 National Archives’ Native Communities Program Instructions for Tagging Documents in the National Archives Online Catalog Instructions: DECIDE which historic tribe, Native community, or geographic area you want to search. LOG IN (or register and then log in) to the National Archives Online Catalog. SEARCH for documents using the search strategies outlined in the appropriate Native Communities Research Guide for your geographic area. Try several approaches. IDENTIFY the Citizen Archivist tagging code for your Native Community either in the Research Guide or the shortcuts on the right. OPEN a document (or description of a group of documents). TAG the document in the lower left-hand corner with the corresponding Citizen Archivist tagging code. Tagging MODERN federally recognized Tagging records with MANY TRIBES Shortcuts to the Citizen Archivist Code Native communities in the Online included: lists Catalog In these instances, tag the record using Each modern Native Community has its the Citizen Archivist Code for ALL Historic Tribal Communities Quick own unique Citizen Archivist Code. If a associated modern communities. Guide (Contingent U.S.) document or group of documents in the Modern Federally Recognized Native Online Catalog includes a modern Example: Communities Quick Guide (Contingent community, use the associated Citizen Treaty between the United States and the U.S.) Archivist code to tag the record. This code Delaware, Potawatomi, Miami and Eel River has been standardized to make the Tribes of Indians at Fort Wayne, Indiana, Alaska Native Research Guide (use either index) records more easily searched in the The historic communities most likely to have future. been affected by this treaty were the Munsee Delaware, Unalachtigo Delaware, Unami Delaware, Potawatomi, Miami, and Eel River. Shortcuts to the Research Guides Tagging OLDER, MORE HISTORIC The document would be tagged with ALL (NT) records: tags below. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, When tagging a record that only lists a Delaware Tribe (Leni Lenape) Arkansas, California, Colorado, historic name, such as “Delaware,” tag NT583 (Stockbridge Munsee Community, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, the document with ALL modern Citizen Wisconsin) Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Archivist codes associated with that NT474 (Delaware Nation, Oklahoma) Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, historic tribe. (Often older documents NT473 (Delaware Tribe of Indians) Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, and other materials simply state the Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, historic name of a tribe or group. This is Potawatomi NT478 (Citizen Potawatomi Nation, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, particularly true in very early materials Oklahoma) Nevada, New Hampshire, New and Indian treaties.) NT580 (Forest County Potawatomi Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Community, Wisconsin) North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, NT390 (Hannahville Indian Community, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Michigan) Rhode Island, South Carolina, South NT393 (Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan) NT384 (Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Potawatomi, Michigan) West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming NT371 (Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, Michigan and Indiana) NT372 (Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation) Miami (including Eel River) NT491 (Miami Tribe of Oklahoma) For search term suggestions see one of the states listed in parenthesis below at https://www.archives.gov/education/native- communities. Tag each document you find in the Online Catalog with ALL modern Citizen Archivist Codes listed (NT code). Historic Tribal Communities Quick Guide (Contingent U.S.) Citizen Archivist Tagging Codes Abenaki (Maine-New Hampshire-New York-Vermont) Passamaquoddy Tribe (Maine) NT398 Penobscot Nation (Maine) NT397 Achumawi (California) Alturas Indian Rancheria, California NT332 Pit River Tribe, California NT631 Alabama (Alabama) Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas NT534 Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town (Oklahoma) NT476 Alsea (Oregon) Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon NT513 Apache See Chiricahua Apache, Jicarilla Apache, Lipan Apache, Mescalero Apache, Mimbreno Apache, Plains Apache (aka Kiowa Apache), or Western Apache. Apalachee (Georgia-Florida) Kialegee Tribal Town (Oklahoma) NT503 Miccosukee Tribe of Indians (Florida) NT365 Seminole Tribe of Florida NT364 Thlopthlocco Tribal Town (Oklahoma) NT494 Arapaho (Kansas-Colorado-Nebraska-Oklahoma-Wyoming) Arapaho Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming NT584 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes, Oklahoma NT479 Arikara (North Dakota-South Dakota) Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation (North Dakota) NT413 Arrow Lakes / Sinixt (Washington) Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (Washington) NT554 Atsugewi (California) Pit River Tribe, California NT631 Susanville Indian Rancheria, California NT349 Bannock (Idaho-Nevada-Oregon-Utah-Wyoming) Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation (Idaho) NT370 Biloxi (Alabama-Mississippi) Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe (Louisiana) NT378 Bitterroot Salish (Flathead) (Montana) Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation (Montana) NT404 Native Communities Program https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities For search term suggestions see one of the states listed in parenthesis below at https://www.archives.gov/education/native- communities. Tag each document you find in the Online Catalog with ALL modern Citizen Archivist Codes listed (NT code). Blackfeet (Idaho-Montana) Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation of Montana NT406 Caddo (Arkansas-Louisiana-Oklahoma-Texas) Caddo Nation of Oklahoma NT481 Cahuilla (California) Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California NT335 Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians, California NT338 Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, California NT350 Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians, California NT257 Morongo Band of Mission Indians, California NT280 Ramona Band of Cahuilla, California NT292 Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians, California NT269 Soboba Band of Luiseo Indians, California NT259 Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, California NT308 Catawba (North Carolina-South Carolina-Virginia) Catawba Indian Nation (South Carolina) NT524 Cayuga (New York) Cayuga Nation (New York) NT465 Seneca-Cayuga Nation (Oklahoma) NT506 Cayuse (Oregon-Washington) Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (Oregon) NT515 Chelan (Washington) Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (Washington) NT554 Chemakum (Washington) Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe (Washington) NT550 Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe (Washington) NT562 Skokomish Indian Tribe (Washington) NT563 Chemehuevi (California) Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California NT335 Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, California NT350 Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation, California NT307 Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and California NT238 Morongo Band of Mission Indians, California NT280 Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians of California NT319 Cherokee (Alabama-Georgia-Kentucky-North Carolina-South Carolina-Tennessee-Virginia-West Virginia) Cherokee Nation (Oklahoma) NT480 Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (North Carolina) NT411 United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma NT496 Chetco (Oregon) Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon NT513 Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria, California NT287 Native Communities Program https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities For search term suggestions see one of the states listed in parenthesis below at https://www.archives.gov/education/native- communities. Tag each document you find in the Online Catalog with ALL modern Citizen Archivist Codes listed (NT code). Cheyenne (Colorado-Montana-Nebraska-South Dakota-Wyoming) Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes, Oklahoma NT479 Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana NT405 Chilula (California) Hoopa Valley Tribe, California NT334 Chimariko (California) Quartz Valley Indian Community of the Quartz Valley Reservation of California NT294 Hoopa Valley Tribe, California NT334 Chinook (Oregon-Washington) Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon NT513 Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon NT514 Chiricahua Apache (Arizona-New Mexico) Mescalero Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation, New Mexico NT435 Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma NT477 Chitimacha (Louisiana) Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana NT375 Choctaw (Alabama-Florida-Louisiana-Mississippi) Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians (Mississippi) NT403 Jena Band of Choctaw Indians (Louisiana) NT376 Chumash (California) Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Mission Indians of the Santa Ynez Reservation, California NT271 Tejon Indian Tribe (California) NT456 Coast Miwok (California) Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, California NT281 Cocopah (Arizona-California) Cocopah Tribe of Arizona NT248 Coeur d'Alene (Idaho-Washington) Coeur D'Alene Tribe (Idaho) NT368 Colville (Washington) Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (Washington) NT554 Comanche (Colorado-Kansas-New Mexico-Oklahoma-Texas) Comanche Nation, Oklahoma NT475 Coos (Oregon) Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians (Oregon) NT521 Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon NT513 Coquille Indian Tribe (Oregon) NT517 Coquille (Oregon) Confederated Tribes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indian Cri'm,Inal Justice
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. 1 I . ~ f .:.- IS~?3 INDIAN CRI'M,INAL JUSTICE 11\ PROG;RAM',"::llISPLAY . ,',' 'i\ ',,.' " ,~,~,} '~" .. ',:f,;< .~ i ,,'; , '" r' ,..... ....... .,r___ 74 "'" ~ ..- ..... ~~~- :":~\ i. " ". U.S. DE P ----''''---£iT _,__ .._~.,~~"ftjlX.£~~I.,;.,..,;tI ... ~:~~~",­ TERIOR BURE AIRS DIVISION OF _--:- .... ~~.;a-NT SERVICES J .... This Reservation criminal justice display is designed to provide information we consider pertinent, to those concerned with Indian criminal justice systems. It is not as complete as we would like it to be since reservation criminal justice is extremely complex and ever changing, to provide all the information necessary to explain the reservation criminal justice system would require a document far more exten::'.J.:ve than this. This publication will undoubtedly change many times in the near future as Indian communities are ever changing and dynamic in their efforts to implement the concept of self-determination and to upgrade their community criminal justice systems. We would like to thank all those persons who contributed to this publication and my special appreciation to Mr. James Cooper, Acting Director of the U.S. Indian Police Training and Research Center, Mr •. James Fail and his staff for their excellent work in compiling this information. Chief, Division of Law Enforcement Services ______ ~ __ ---------=.~'~r--~----~w~___ ------------------------------------~'=~--------------~--------~. ~~------ I' - .. Bureau of Indian Affairs Division of Law Enforcement Services U.S. Indian Police Training and Research Center Research and Statistical Unit S.UMM.ARY. ~L JUSTICE PROGRAM DISPLAY - JULY 1974 It appears from the attached document that the United States and/or Indian tribes have primary criminal and/or civil jurisdiction on 121 Indian reservations assigned administratively to 60 Agencies in 11 Areas, or the equivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010
    Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation Alturas Indian Rancheria Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians (formerly the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation) Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians of the Barona Reservation Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Big Lagoon Rancheria Big Pine Band of Owens Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine Reservation Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria Blue Lake Rancheria Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of California Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa Rancheria Cahto Indian Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians of the Cahuilla Reservation California Valley Miwok Tribe Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation Cedarville Rancheria Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and
    [Show full text]
  • People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: a Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology 2012 People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada Douglas Deur Portland State University, [email protected] Deborah Confer University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Deur, Douglas and Confer, Deborah, "People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada" (2012). Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations. 98. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac/98 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Pacific West Region: Social Science Series National Park Service Publication Number 2012-01 U.S. Department of the Interior PEOPLE OF SNOWY MOUNTAIN, PEOPLE OF THE RIVER: A MULTI-AGENCY ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW AND COMPENDIUM RELATING TO TRIBES ASSOCIATED WITH CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 2012 Douglas Deur, Ph.D. and Deborah Confer LAKE MEAD AND BLACK CANYON Doc Searls Photo, Courtesy Wikimedia Commons
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2018/19 Tribal Nation Grant Fund
    FY 2018/19 Tribal Nation Grant Fund Disbursements Tribe Name Application Title Awarded Amount 1 Ione Band of Miwok Indians of California Economic Diversification & Community and Housing Development $ 400,000.00 2 Sherwood Valley Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California Eastside Housing Development Project $ 400,000.00 3 Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria Self Governance $ 400,000.00 4 Big Lagoon Rancheria Community Services $ 400,000.00 5 Big Pine Paiute Tribe of the Owens Valley (previously listed as the Big Pine Band of Owens Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine Reservation) Indigenous Wellness $ 400,000.00 6 Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians of California (previously listed as the Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California) Work Force Development and Housing $ 400,000.00 7 Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria Renewable Energy and Economic Development $ 400,000.00 8 Bishop Paiute Tribe (previously listed as the Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community of the Bishop Colony) Equipment Acquisition $ 400,000.00 9 Bridgeport Indian Colony (previously listed as the Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of California) Generators and Forklift $ 400,000.00 10 Cahto Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria Community Development $ 400,000.00 11 Cahuilla Band of Indians (previously listed as the Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians of the Cahuilla Reservation) Governmental Infrastructure Development and Training $ 400,000.00 12 Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation Economic and Community
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 20/Tuesday, January
    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 20 / Tuesday, January 30, 2018 / Notices 4235 Type of Information Collection: electronic, mechanical, or other Disaster Grants—Public Assistance Revision of a currently approved technological collection techniques or (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, information collection. other forms of information technology, Hazard Mitigation Grant. OMB Number: 1660–0085. e.g., permitting electronic submission of Brock Long, FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 003–0–1, responses. Administrator, Federal Emergency Crisis Counseling Assistance and Dated: January 25, 2018. Management Agency. Training Program, Immediate Services [FR Doc. 2018–01775 Filed 1–29–18; 8:45 am] Program Application; FEMA Form 003– William H. Holzerland, 0–2, Crisis Counseling Assistance and Sr. Director for Information Management, BILLING CODE 9111–23–P Training Program, Regular Services Mission Support, Department of Homeland Security. Program Application; SF–424, Application for Federal Assistance; SF– [FR Doc. 2018–01765 Filed 1–29–18; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BILLING CODE 9111–23–P 424A, Budget Information for Non- Bureau of Indian Affairs Construction Programs; SF–425, Federal Financial Report; HHS Checklist/08– [189A2100DD/AAKC001030/ DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND A0A501010.999900 253G] 2007; HHS Project Performance Site SECURITY Location Form; ISP report narrative; Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible Quarterly Report Narratives; Final RSP Federal Emergency Management To Receive Services From the United Report Narrative,. Agency Abstract: The CCP consists of two States Bureau of Indian Affairs [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–3392– grant programs, the Immediate Services AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, EM; Docket ID FEMA–2018–0001] Program (ISP) and the Regular Services Interior. Program (RSP).
    [Show full text]
  • California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A
    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Written and Designed by Nicole Mullen Contributors: Ira Jacknis, Barbara Takiguchi, and Liberty Winn. Sources Consulted The former exhibition: Food in California Indian Culture at the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology. Ortiz, Beverly, as told by Julia Parker. It Will Live Forever. Heyday Books, Berkeley, CA 1991. Jacknis, Ira. Food in California Indian Culture. Hearst Museum Publications, Berkeley, CA, 2004. Copyright © 2003. Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology and the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. All Rights Reserved. PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Table of Contents 1. Glossary 2. Topics of Discussion for Lessons 3. Map of California Cultural Areas 4. General Overview of California Indians 5. Plants and Plant Processing 6. Animals and Hunting 7. Food from the Sea and Fishing 8. Insects 9. Beverages 10. Salt 11. Drying Foods 12. Earth Ovens 13. Serving Utensils 14. Food Storage 15. Feasts 16. Children 17. California Indian Myths 18. Review Questions and Activities PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Glossary basin an open, shallow, usually round container used for holding liquids carbohydrate Carbohydrates are found in foods like pasta, cereals, breads, rice and potatoes, and serve as a major energy source in the diet. Central Valley The Central Valley lies between the Coast Mountain Ranges and the Sierra Nevada Mountain Ranges. It has two major river systems, the Sacramento and the San Joaquin. Much of it is flat, and looks like a broad, open plain. It forms the largest and most important farming area in California and produces a great variety of crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Mattole River Cumulative Effects
    Mattole River Watershed Analysis Cumulative Watershed Effects Public Review Draft September 2011 Cumulative Watershed Effects TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS ........................................................................................................ vi LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF MAPS ........................................................................................................................ viii LIST OF ATTACHMENTS .......................................................................................................... x LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................... xi 1.0 ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 OVERVIEW OF WATERSHED ANALYSIS PROCESS .................................................................. 6 2.2 PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION OF REPORT .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance
    [email protected] Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance In October 2011, the Bishop Tribal Council held the 1st of a series of Pub- lic Hearings regarding proposed changes in the enrollment ordinance. The pro- posed changes would be to amend the ordinance to add new criteria such as: blood quantum, a residency clause, and having a contin- ual generational enrollment of descendents. Question: How did we arrive at Each meeting scheduled has discussed a “proposing” a blood quantum different topic. The most recent meeting on Janu- or enrollment changes? ary 25, 2012, the Bishop Tribal Council had invited On December 17, 2009 a tribal ENROLLMENT survey was taken asking if COMMITTEE representatives from the Bureau of Indian Affairs Tribal members would like to in Sacramento, California to give a presentation include a blood quantum in the LAURINE NAPOLES and answer any questions regarding blood quan- tum and when it is used or if it is still used. The current Tribal Enrollment Ordi- RUTH CHAVEZ nance. (134 people responded) meeting with the Bureau of Indian Affairs was in- PATTY MANRIQUEZ This lead to proposed changes formative for both the Enrollment Committee and and public hearings. GERALD HOWARD the community. ROBIN HOWARD The importance of these Public Hearings is for the community to become informed and be involved in the decision making process. Hopefully, the Enrollment Committee and Department can answer some ENROLLMENT DEPARTMENT of the misconceptions that have been mentioned during the Public Hearings. (i.e., GERTRUDE BROWN, We have members coming out of the “wood works”.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item – Staff Report
    AGENDA ITEM – STAFF REPORT TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND COMMISSIONERS FROM: JEFFREY O’NEAL, AICP, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: APPLICATION NO. 20-23, THE VALLEY AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS, LLC COMMERCIAL CANNABIS PROJECT DATE: DECEMBER 29, 2020 ISSUE In the matter of Application No. 20-23, the Valley Agricultural Holdings LLC project, shall the Planning Commission: 1. Make a determination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, make a determination of General Plan consistency for the disposal of real property, and approve a conditional use permit; and 2. Make recommendations to the City Council regarding a general plan amendment, rezone, and development agreement? BACKGROUND The State of California’s Medical and Adult Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) is the primary statute that regulates personal, medicinal, and commercial cannabis activity in the state. In addition to MAUCRSA, Chapters 8.37 (Commercial Cannabis Businesses) and 17.99 (Commercial Cannabis Overly District) of the Mendota Municipal Code (MMC) provide regulations applicable to non-personal cannabis activities at the local level. Pursuant to these local regulations, an applicant wishing to undertake commercial cannabis activities must meet certain location criteria, receive approval of a conditional use permit, and enter into a development agreement with the City. Dating to early 2019, the City has been in discussions with various entities regarding development of a commercial cannabis facility on a portion of a City-owned parcel (APN 013-030-68ST) adjacent to the City’s wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). In October 2019, the City entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Valley Agricultural Holdings, LLC. On October 13, 2020 the Planning Department received an application from Valley Agricultural Holdings, LLC requesting a variety of entitlements and actions to facilitate the construction and operation of a commercial cannabis facility as discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought and Equity in California
    Drought and Equity in California Laura Feinstein, Rapichan Phurisamban, Amanda Ford, Christine Tyler, Ayana Crawford January 2017 Drought and Equity in California January 2017 Lead Authors Laura Feinstein, Senior Research Associate, Pacific Institute Rapichan Phurisamban, Research Associate, Pacific Institute Amanda Ford, Coalition Coordinator, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water Christine Tyler, Water Policy Leadership Intern, Pacific Institute Ayana Crawford, Water Policy Leadership Intern, Pacific Institute Drought and Equity Advisory Committee and Contributing Authors The Drought and Equity Advisory Committee members acted as contributing authors, but all final editorial decisions were made by lead authors. Sara Aminzadeh, Executive Director, California Coastkeeper Alliance Colin Bailey, Executive Director, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water Carolina Balazs, Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley Wendy Broley, Staff Engineer, California Urban Water Agencies Amanda Fencl, PhD Student, University of California, Davis Center for Environmental Policy and Behavior Kelsey Hinton, Program Associate, Community Water Center Gita Kapahi, Director, Office of Public Participation, State Water Resources Control Board Brittani Orona, Environmental Justice and Tribal Affairs Specialist and Native American Studies Doctoral Student, University of California, Davis Brian Pompeii, Lecturer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Tim Sloane, Executive Director, Institute for Fisheries Resources ISBN-978-1-893790-76-6 © 2017 Pacific Institute. All rights reserved. Pacific Institute 654 13th Street, Preservation Park Oakland, California 94612 Phone: 510.251.1600 | Facsimile: 510.251.2203 www.pacinst.org Cover Photos: Clockwise from top left: NNehring, Debargh, Yykkaa, Marilyn Nieves Designer: Bryan Kring, Kring Design Studio Drought and Equity in California I ABOUT THE PACIFIC INSTITUTE The Pacific Institute envisions a world in which society, the economy, and the environment have the water they need to thrive now and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Heritage Commission 40Th Anniversary Gala
    “Itu ~(/; W/is ~the ~policy 4of ~the ~state Uwd/;that Native~ Americansll/~ remains ~ ~~~~JwJU~~JJand associated grave goods shall be repatriated.” - California Public Resources Code 5097.991 Table of Contents Event Agenda ....................................................................................................................1 Welcome Letter – Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. ...........................................................2 2016 Native American Day Proclamation ...........................................................................3 Welcome Letter – NAHC Chairperson James Ramos ...................................................... 4 Welcome Letter – NAHC Executive Secretary Cynthia Gomez .........................................5 Keynote Speaker Biography ............................................................................................6 State Capitol Rotunda Displays .......................................................................................7 Native American Heritage Commission’s Mission Statement .............................................8 Tribal People of California Map .......................................................................................13 California Indian Seal ...................................................................................................... 14 The Eighteen Unratifed Treaties of 1851-1852 between the California Indians and the United States Government .................................................................................15 NAHC Timeline
    [Show full text]
  • California Gambling Control Commission Revenue Sharing Trust Fund Recipients March 4, 2009
    CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION REVENUE SHARING TRUST FUND RECIPIENTS MARCH 4, 2009 TRIBE CASINO LOCATION 1 Alturas Indian Rancheria Desert Rose Casino Alturas 2 Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria Bear River Casino Loleta 3 Benton Paiute Reservation N/A Benton 4 Big Lagoon Rancheria N/A Trinidad 5 Big Pine Reservation N/A Big Pine 6 Big Sandy Rancheria Mono Wind Casino Auberry Konocti Vista 7 Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians Lakeport Casino Paiute Palace 8 Bishop Paiute Tribe Bishop Casino 9 Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony N/A Bridgeport 10 Buena Vista Rancheria N/A Ione 11 Cahto Indian Tribe of Laytonville Rancheria Red Fox Casino Laytonville Cahuilla Creek 12 Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians Anza Casino 13 California Valley Miwok Tribe N/A Stockton 14 Cedarville Rancheria N/A Alturas Havasu Landing 15 Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Havasu Lake Resort and Casino Cher-Ae-Heights 16 Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community Trinidad Casino Chicken Ranch 17 Chicken Ranch Rancheria Jamestown Bingo and Casino 18 Cloverdale Rancheria N/A Cloverdale 19 Cold Springs Rancheria N/A Tollhouse CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION REVENUE SHARING TRUST FUND RECIPIENTS MARCH 4, 2009 TRIBE CASINO LOCATION 20 Colorado River Indian Tribes N/A Parker, AZ 1 21 Cortina Rancheria N/A Williams Coyote Valley 22 Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians Redwood Valley Shodakai Casino 23 Death Valley Timba-Sha Shoshone Tribe N/A Death Valley 24 Elem Indian Colony N/A Clearlake Oaks 25 Elk Valley Rancheria Elk Valley Casino Crescent City 26 Enterprise Rancheria N/A Oroville
    [Show full text]