Recent Scholarship in Quaker History
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography (PMHB), LXIII (1939), 285, 286; Wickersham, Education, 249; Arthur S
PennsylvaniTHE a Magazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY Anthony Benezet and the Africans' School: Toward A Theory of Full Equality AMONG the many but relatively little-known achievements of A Philadelphia Quaker educator, humanitarian, and social critic Anthony Benezet (1713-1784), probably the most significant, both in his time and in the two centuries since, was his discovery of the inherent equality of the black and white races. By applying his radical Protestant theories of human brotherhood in his classes for black children, he proved to his own satisfaction first, and then to others, that the widespread belief in black mental and moral inferiority was founded only in the fears and prejudices of the white ruling race. Beyond the long-range effect of this start- ling social discovery on a skeptical, sophisticated Enlightenment audience, the impact it had on his own students and their peers and descendants may turn out to be even more important in an ongoing revolution in attitudes and sociopolitical adjustments. Anthony Benezet's Philadelphia had grown to a city of approxi- mately 15,000 inhabitants by the year 1750, when he first began his experiments in teaching black children to read, write, and do simple arithmetic. The port city had never had a large slave popula- tion, owing largely to the commercial nature of its economy. Esti- 399 4<X) NANCY SLOCUM HORNICK October mates of the black population at mid-century range upward from 3,000, of which an unknown proportion were freemen. A very few of the slaves may have been tutored in the homes of their masters, their reading limited to the Bible and catechism. -
Litigating the Lash: Quaker Emancipator Robert Pleasants, the Law
LITIGATING THE LASH: QUAKER EMANCIPATOR ROBERT PLEASANTS, THE LAW OF SLAVERY, AND THE MEANING OF MANUMISSION IN REVOLUTIONARY AND EARLY NATIONAL VIRGINIA By William Fernandez Hardin Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in History May, 2013 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Richard J.M. Blackett David L. Carlton Daniel J. Sharfstein Daniel H. Usner Copyright © by William Fernandez Hardin All Rights Reserved To Jessica, for loving a grumpy man, and to Ainsley, for making him less grumpy. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the Virginia Historical Society and the John D. Rockefeller Jr. Library at Colonial Williamsburg for their support in the research of this dissertation—both collections proved invaluable and the staff helped a fledging graduate student navigate unfamiliar terrain. I would also like to thank the Folger Institute’s Center for the History of British Political Thought in Washington D.C. and my fellow participants in the “Changing Conceptions of Property” seminar for the opportunity to spend a summer discussing the relationship between English property law and colonial governance. I would also like to thank the Vanderbilt history department for its generous support. It has been a pleasure to learn the craft from such a distinguished group of historians. Professors Michael Bess, Bill Caferro, Katie Crawford, Dennis Dickerson, and Elizabeth Lunbeck, each—in vastly different ways—helped me discover new ways of considering the past and the people who lived there and I thank them for it. I would also like to thank the Vanderbilt Americanist Works-in-Progress Seminar for graciously allowing me to present my work and the invaluable comments and critiques provided. -
Lemaître and Hoyle: Contrasting Characters in Science and Religion
S & CB (2012), 24, 111–127 0954–4194 RODNEY HOLDER Lemaître and Hoyle: Contrasting Characters in Science and Religion Georges Lemaître was a jocular Roman Catholic priest and Fred Hoyle a bluff Yorkshireman who despised organised religion. Both were giants of twentieth century cosmology but espoused diametrically opposed cosmological models. This paper explores the extent to which ideology, and particularly religion, played a part in the controversies over the Big Bang and steady-state theories. A significant problem for many cosmologists, including Hoyle, was posed by the idea that the universe had a temporal beginning: an eternal, unchanging universe seemed metaphysically preferable. And Hoyle was highly polemical about religion in his popular writings. In contrast, Lemaître saw no theological import from the Big Bang, and never entered a debate about its theological implications until, perhaps unexpectedly, he took issue with an address given by the Pope. Hoyle’s seminal work on stellar nucleosynthesis led him to speak of a ‘superintellect monkeying with physics’ though this was never identified with the God of classical theism. The work of both Lemaître and Hoyle resonates with more recent debates concerning cosmology. Key words: Lemaître, Hoyle, Big Bang, steady-state theory, cosmology, creation Introduction In Georges Lemaître and Fred Hoyle we have two characters who are so utterly different in many ways, yet who shared one very significant attrib- ute: they were giants in twentieth century cosmology and astrophysics. In short, here we have a Belgian Roman Catholic priest who can rightly be described as the Father of the Big Bang, and in Hoyle an atheist York- shireman who pioneered the alternative of a steady-state universe with neither beginning nor end. -
Of Pendle Hill Pamphlets 1934 - 2014
Index of Pendle Hill Pamphlets 1934 - 2014 Introduction Many remarkable gifts have come out of the Pendle Hill experience, but few are more remarkable than the series of Pendle Hill Pamphlets, ongoing now for eighty years. Conceived as the published equivalent of messages spoken in a Friends’ meeting for worship, these brief essays reflect the range and vision of unprogrammed Quaker religious thought and practice. Among the authors represented here are a handful of famous names, such as Toynbee, Weil, and Buber. But for the most part the pamphlets are the works of a “cloud of witnesses” distinguished primarily for their spirit and expressiveness. And while there are recurring themes among them (peace, worship, art), the four hundred-plus titles cover almost as many topics. Over the years, many readers have commented on the richness of spiritual resources and information represented in these essays. Many have also asked for help in using them in study, reflection, and research. This index is designed to answer that need. It includes four sections: • Section I is an annotated list of the pamphlets. This list is in numerical order, and the pamphlet number serves as a cross-reference tool throughout the index. Each listing includes title, author, date of publication (in parentheses), a brief summary of the essay, and its subjects. • Section II groups the pamphlets alphabetically by author. • Section III lists the pamphlets alphabetically by title. • Section IV offers a subject index for the pamphlets. Index by Number Cooperation and Coercion as Methods of Social Change Nicholson, Vincent De Witt (1934) 1 The author asks if the consequences of differences and conflicts can be creative instead of devastating. -
Edward Milne's Influence on Modern Cosmology
ANNALS OF SCIENCE, Vol. 63, No. 4, October 2006, 471Á481 Edward Milne’s Influence on Modern Cosmology THOMAS LEPELTIER Christ Church, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1DP, UK Received 25 October 2005. Revised paper accepted 23 March 2006 Summary During the 1930 and 1940s, the small world of cosmologists was buzzing with philosophical and methodological questions. The debate was stirred by Edward Milne’s cosmological model, which was deduced from general principles that had no link with observation. Milne’s approach was to have an important impact on the development of modern cosmology. But this article shows that it is an exaggeration to intimate, as some authors have done recently, that Milne’s rationalism went on to infiltrate the discipline. Contents 1. Introduction. .........................................471 2. Methodological and philosophical questions . ..................473 3. The outcome of the debate .................................476 1. Introduction In a series of articles, Niall Shanks, John Urani, and above all George Gale1 have analysed the debate stirred by Edward Milne’s cosmological model.2 Milne was a physicist we can define, at a philosophical level, as an ‘operationalist’, a ‘rationalist’ and a ‘hypothetico-deductivist’.3 The first term means that Milne considered only the observable entities of a theory to be real; this led him to reject the notions of curved space or space in expansion. The second term means that Milne tried to construct a 1 When we mention these authors without speaking of one in particular, we will use the expression ‘Gale and co.’ 2 George Gale, ‘Rationalist Programmes in Early Modern Cosmology’, The Astronomy Quarterly,8 (1991), 193Á218. -
A Solution of the Interpretation Problem of Lorentz Transformations
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 July 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202007.0705.v1 Article A Solution of the Interpretation Problem of Lorentz Transformations Grit Kalies* HTW University of Applied Sciences Dresden; 1 Friedrich-List-Platz, D-01069 Dresden, [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected], Tel.: +49-351-462-2552 Abstract: For more than one hundred years, scientists dispute the correct interpretation of Lorentz transformations within the framework of the special theory of relativity of Albert Einstein. On the one hand, the changes in length, time and mass with increasing velocity are interpreted as apparent due to the observer dependence within special relativity. On the other hand, real changes are described corresponding to the experimental evidence of mass increase in particle accelerators or of clock delay. This ambiguity is accompanied by an ongoing controversy about valid Lorentz-transformed thermodynamic quantities such as entropy, pressure and temperature. In this paper is shown that the interpretation problem of the Lorentz transformations is genuinely anchored within the postulates of special relativity and can be solved on the basis of the thermodynamic approach of matter-energy equivalence, i.e. an energetic distinction between matter and mass. It is suggested that the velocity-dependent changes in state quantities are real in each case, in full agreement with the experimental evidence. Keywords: interpretation problem; Lorentz transformation; special relativity; thermodynamics; potential energy; space; time; entropy; non-mechanistic ether theory © 2020 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 July 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202007.0705.v1 2 of 25 1. -
Herbert Dingle 1890-1978 J
288 Obituary: Herbert Dingle 1890-1978 J. Brit, astron. Assoc. OBITUARY HERBERT DINGLE: 1890-1978 Professor Herbert Dingle died in Hull on 1978 September 4 at the age of 88. He had been a member of the Association for 48 years. Born in London on 1890 August 2, he was taken to Devon after the death of his father and educated there. At 14 he left school and obtained a job as a clerk, studying in what little spare time he had until in 1915, at the age of 25, he won a Royal Scholarship for Physics at Imperial College, London. There he graduated three years later with honours and, a strong admirer of Alfred Fowler, who was a pioneer in astronomical spectro scopy, Dingle carried out research in the same field and in 1924 wrote an excellent overview of the subject in his Modern Astrophysics. In 1932 he was Rockefeller Foundation Scholar at the California Institute of Technology, and in 1937 was appointed to the Chair of Astrophysics at Imperial College. In 1946, a year after the end of the Second World War, Dingle moved to University College London to become Professor of the History and Philosophy of Science. At University College he led a notable team of historians of science, and the post also allowed him new scope to pursue his very strong interests in philosophy and, in particular, the philosophy of science. Dingle always believed that the world of the physicist and the world of 'common sense' were not incompatible—they were alternative approaches to the rational correlation of phenomena. -
Index of Pendle Hill Pamphlets 1934 - 2017
Index of Pendle Hill Pamphlets 1934 - 2017 Introduction Many remarkable gifts have come out of the Pendle Hill experience, but few are more remarkable than the series of Pendle Hill Pamphlets, ongoing now for eighty years. Conceived as the published equivalent of messages spoken in a Friends’ meeting for worship, these brief essays reflect the range and vision of unprogrammed Quaker religious thought and practice. Among the authors represented here are a handful of famous names, such as Toynbee, Weil, and Buber. But for the most part the pamphlets are the works of a “cloud of witnesses” distinguished primarily for their spirit and expressiveness. And while there are recurring themes among them (peace, worship, art), the four hundred-plus titles cover almost as many topics. Over the years, many readers have commented on the richness of spiritual resources and information represented in these essays. Many have also asked for help in using them in study, reflection, and research. This index is designed to answer that need. It includes four sections: • Section I is an annotated list of the pamphlets. This list is in numerical order, and the pamphlet number serves as a cross-reference tool throughout the index. Each listing includes title, author, date of publication (in parentheses), a brief summary of the essay, and its subjects. • Section II groups the pamphlets alphabetically by author. • Section III lists the pamphlets alphabetically by title. • Section IV offers a subject index for the pamphlets. Index by Number Cooperation and Coercion as Methods of Social Change Nicholson, Vincent De Witt (1934) 1 The author asks if the consequences of differences and conflicts can be creative instead of devastating. -
Down but Not Out: How American Slavery Survived the Constitutional Era
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History 12-16-2015 Down But Not Out: How American Slavery Survived the Constitutional Era Jason Butler Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Recommended Citation Butler, Jason, "Down But Not Out: How American Slavery Survived the Constitutional Era." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2015. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/99 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOWN BUT NOT OUT: HOW AMERICAN SLAVERY SURVIVED THE CONSTITUTIONAL ERA by JASON E. BUTLER Under the Direction of H. Robert Baker, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Whether through legal assault, private manumissions or slave revolt, the institution of slavery weathered sustained and substantial blows throughout the era spanning the American Revolution and Constitutional Era. The tumult of the rebellion against the British, the inspiration of Enlightenment ideals and the evolution of the American economy combined to weaken slavery as the delegates converged on Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Even in the South, it was not hard to find prominent individuals working, speaking or writing against slavery. During the Convention, however, Northern delegates capitulated to staunch Southern advocates of slavery not because of philosophical misgivings but because of economic considerations. Delegates from North and South looked with anticipation toward the nation’s expansion into the Southwest, confident it would occasion a slavery-based economic boom. -
The Universe of General Relativity, Springer 2005.Pdf
Einstein Studies Editors: Don Howard John Stachel Published under the sponsorship of the Center for Einstein Studies, Boston University Volume 1: Einstein and the History of General Relativity Don Howard and John Stachel, editors Volume 2: Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity Abhay Ashtekar and John Stachel, editors Volume 3: Studies in the History of General Relativity Jean Eisenstaedt and A.J. Kox, editors Volume 4: Recent Advances in General Relativity Allen I. Janis and John R. Porter, editors Volume 5: The Attraction of Gravitation: New Studies in the History of General Relativity John Earman, Michel Janssen and John D. Norton, editors Volume 6: Mach’s Principle: From Newton’s Bucket to Quantum Gravity Julian B. Barbour and Herbert Pfister, editors Volume 7: The Expanding Worlds of General Relativity Hubert Goenner, Jürgen Renn, Jim Ritter, and Tilman Sauer, editors Volume 8: Einstein: The Formative Years, 1879–1909 Don Howard and John Stachel, editors Volume 9: Einstein from ‘B’ to ‘Z’ John Stachel Volume 10: Einstein Studies in Russia Yuri Balashov and Vladimir Vizgin, editors Volume 11: The Universe of General Relativity A.J. Kox and Jean Eisenstaedt, editors A.J. Kox Jean Eisenstaedt Editors The Universe of General Relativity Birkhauser¨ Boston • Basel • Berlin A.J. Kox Jean Eisenstaedt Universiteit van Amsterdam Observatoire de Paris Instituut voor Theoretische Fysica SYRTE/UMR8630–CNRS Valckenierstraat 65 F-75014 Paris Cedex 1018 XE Amsterdam France The Netherlands AMS Subject Classification (2000): 01A60, 83-03, 83-06 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The universe of general relativity / A.J. Kox, editors, Jean Eisenstaedt. p. -
David Cooper's Fight Against Slavery By
An Ordinary Man in Extraordinary Times: David Cooper's Fight against Slavery by Kristin DeBusk A SENIOR THESIS for the UNIVERSITY HONORS COLLEGE Submitted to the University Honors College at Texas Tech University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree designation of HIGHEST HONORS DECEMBER 2004 Approved by: DI0!RETCHEN A~ ADAMS . - Asststant Professor, Department of History DR. G BELL Dean, %'tverstty Honors College The nutfter approves the photocopying of this document for edocational purposes. "The power of prejudice over the minds of mankind is very extraordinary; hardly any extreams too distant, or absurdities too glaring for it to unite or reconcile, if it tends to promote or justify a favorite pursuit. It is thus we are to account for the fallacious reasonings and absurd sentiments used and entertained concerning negroes, and the lawfulness of keeping them slaves. "' These words, written in 1772 by New Jersey farmer David Cooper, illustrate that abolitionist ideas were not confined to a small elhe group, barely taking hold among Britain's North American colonists as some increasingly began to resist royal authority over their own affairs. Still, as the movement gained momentum, even those concerned with the notions of "liberty" and "tyranny" sometimes had different goals. Noted historian of the American Revolution, Gordon Wood, has concluded that when we speak of the Revolution, we must concede that there were "many revolutions at once, the product of a complicated culmination of many diverse personal grievances and social strains." David Cooper, like many others, was influenced by these Revolutionary ideas. In his case, the "diverse personal grievances" manifested themselves in the desire to extend the idea of the "liberty" his neighbors spoke of to those most lacking it: the enslaved. -
Religious Freedom in Philadelphia
Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 2005 Religious Freedom in Philadelphia Philip A. Hamburger Columbia Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Philip A. Hamburger, Religious Freedom in Philadelphia, 54 EMORY L. J. 1603 (2005). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2234 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN PHILADELPHIA Philip Hamburger Some controversies seem particularly significant for the development of constitutional rights. For the freedom from an establishment of religion, the most famous early debate occurred in Virginia in the mid-1780s. 1 For the more immediate freedom of religion, however-the freedom from penalty or constraint on religion-the central historical debate is less familiar. It was in some respects merely a local quarrel, which embroiled Quakers and Revolutionaries in Philadelphia during a few tense weeks in 1775. Nonetheless, it was a revealing moment in the development of American religious liberty. At a time when Americans were struggling for equality against Britain, they also expected equality in their religious liberty, and their egalitarian vision of their freedom from penalties on religion soon came into conflict with the perspective of those who needed a greater religious liberty. Of course, this tension between different conceptions of religious liberty was evident in many states, but nowhere were the results more dramatic than in Philadelphia, and today, the controversy in Philadelphia reveals much about the character of American religious liberty and about its foundations in American society and its ideals.