DOCSLIB.ORG

Full PDF of Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Full PDF of Annual Report Council on Foreign Relations Council Foreign on Council on Foreign Relations 58 East 68th Street New York, NY 10065 tel 212.434.9400 fax 212.434.9800 Annual Report 1777 F Street, NW R Annual Washington, DC 20006 tel 202.509.8400 fax 202.509.8490 eport 2015 www.cfr.org TeleGeography/www.telegeography.com: cover image (This 2015 map depicts the fiber-optic cables that carry 95 percent of intercontinental communications traffic. 2015 Together these submarine cables measure over 600,000 miles.) 2015Annual Report Annual Report July 1, 2014–June 30, 2015 Council on Foreign Relations 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065 tel 212.434.9400 fax 212.434.9800 1777 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006 tel 202.509.8400 fax 202.509.8490 www.cfr.org [email protected] OFFICERS DIRECTORS Carla A. Hills Term Expiring 2016 T erm Expiring 2019 Co-Chairman Steven A. Denning David G. Bradley Robert E. Rubin Ann M. Fudge Blair Effron Co-Chairman Thomas H. Glocer Susan Hockfield David M. Rubenstein Eduadro J. Padrón Donna J. Hrinak Vice Chairman John A. Paulson James G. Stavridis Colin L. Powell Vin Weber Richard N. Haass Christine Todd Whitman Daniel H. Yergin President T erm Expiring 2017 T erm Expiring 2020 Keith Olson Executive Vice President, Stephen Friedman John P. Abizaid Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer Peter B. Henry Mary McInnis Boies Carla A. Hills Timothy F. Geithner James M. Lindsay Jami Miscik Stephen J. Hadley Senior Vice President, Director of Studies, Robert E. Rubin James Manyika Maurice R. Greenberg Chair Richard E. Salomon Richard L. Plepler Nancy D. Bodurtha Margaret G. Warner David M. Rubenstein Vice President, Meetings and Membership T erm Expiring 2018 Richard N. Haass, ex officio Irina A. Faskianos Zoë Baird Vice President, National Program Alan S. Blinder and Outreach R. Nicholas Burns Suzanne E. Helm Laurence D. Fink Vice President, Philanthropy and J. Tomilson Hill Corporate Relations Shirley Ann Jackson Jan Mowder Hughes Ruth Porat Vice President, Human Resources and Administration Caroline Netchvolodoff OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, Vice President, Education EMERITUS & HONORARY Lisa Shields Madeleine K. Albright Vice President, Global Communications Director Emerita and Media Relations Leslie H. Gelb Lynda Hammes President Emeritus Publisher, Foreign Affairs Maurice R. Greenberg Jeffrey A. Reinke Honorary Vice Chairman Secretary of the Corporation Peter G. Peterson Chairman Emeritus David Rockefeller Honorary Chairman Note: This list of Officers and Directors is current as of July 1, 2015. A historical roster of Directors and Officers can be found on pages 33–35. Contents 4 Mission Statement 5 Letter From the Co-Chairs 7 President’s Message 11 2015 Highlights 27 Foreign Affairs 30 Committees of the Board 32 2015 Board Election and Appointments 33 Historical Roster of Directors and Officers 36 Membership 40 Membership Roster 64 Corporate Members 67 Endowed and Named Chairs, Fellowships, and Lectureships 71 International Affairs Fellowship Program 72 Global Board of Advisors 73 Council of Councils 74 By-Laws of the Council 79 Rules, Guidelines, and Practices 84 Staff 90 Financial Statements Mission Statement The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR takes no institutional positions on matters of policy. CFR carries out its mission by ■■ maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; ■■ convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with CFR members to discuss and debate major inter- national issues; ■■ supporting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce articles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; ■■ publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; ■■ sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and ■■ providing up-to-date information and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org. Mission Statement 4 Letter From the Co-Chairs As co-chairs of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), it should come as no surprise that we have a great deal of affection and respect for this organization. The Council manages to be at once relevant and intellec- tually independent. Amid the cacophony of voices, opinions, and plat- forms, it is a trusted source of analysis and a rare forum for nonpartisan debate and exchange. While holding fast to its traditions, the organi- zation also continues to evolve. As a result, one of the most influential policy institutions in the United States is positioning itself to continue making significant contributions as it has in the past. Known for its rigorous analysis and innovative thinking, CFR’s schol- ars are one pillar of the institution’s strength. Their prominence places them—and the organization—at the frontlines of debates and policy- making in the United States. This year alone, CFR fellows published four hundred op-eds and columns in leading outlets in this country and around the world; testified before Congress on at least thirteen occa- sions; and provided nearly two hundred briefings to lawmakers, senior administration officials, intelligence agencies, and the Departments of State, Treasury, Homeland Security, Energy, and Defense. CFR’s mem- bers, for their part, help make the institution a respected and valued des- tination for visiting leaders. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Iraqi President Fuad Masum, Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, and some forty other foreign offi- cials addressed and took questions from CFR members in fiscal year Co-Chairman Carla A. Hills 2015, as dozens do every year in the midst of crises, transitions, or nego- tiations—or whenever they need to reach the most informed community in U.S. foreign policy. As former officials ourselves, we know one reason leaders trust the Council as both a forum and a source: the organization and its work are entirely independent. Despite its influence among lawmakers and its proximity to high-ranking policymakers, CFR accepts no funding from governments—including the United States—preserving its ability to cri- tique the policies of any. Along similar lines, and amid an ever-deepening political divide, the Council remains resolutely nonpartisan. In the think tank, scholars’ diversity of opinion is as valued as their expertise, and with meetings that include opinions across the political spectrum and members of all ideological persuasions, the Council is a rare place today where deliberations can occur off the record and across the aisle. The same commitment informs the pages of Foreign Affairs, where essays are wide-ranging, thought-provoking, and, on occasion, controversial. Nei- ther CFR nor Foreign Affairs takes institutional positions; what they have in common is a commitment to honest analysis. The result is an organiza- tion with the ability to speak truth to power, and one where thinking and exchange are not stymied by partisan politics. The Council has always been characterized by inquiry and indepen- dence, and the organization is also evolving, both intellectually and institutionally, to meet the challenges and realities of a changing world. As Richard details in the pages that follow, CFR’s nearly eighty full and Co-Chairman Robert E. Rubin Letter From the Co-Chairs 5 part-time scholars cover a broader range of issues today than at any other time in history, from nuclear proliferation to climate change, violent con- flict to cybersecurity, and international economics to public health. At the same time, as an interconnected world renders governments, individ- uals, and institutions more vulnerable to events unfolding on the other side of the globe, the Council is working to reach increasingly important communities, such as those of religious leaders and local elected officials, and to include them in the dialogue surrounding international relations. To equip the next generation of Americans with the knowledge they need to understand the world that will become theirs, CFR also provides programming and content for teachers and students. And to secure the future of policymaking, the organization cultivates rising talent through its Term Member Program, which gives outstanding young professionals access to resources and programming, and through the highly esteemed International Affairs Fellowship Program, which gives mid-career schol- ars the opportunity to work in government and those coming from gov- ernment the chance to work in academic environments. Since it was founded nearly a century ago in opposition to a rising tide of isolationism, CFR has occupied a unique place in U.S. foreign policy and has remained a trusted resource of analysis. CFR encourages thoughtful U.S. involvement in a world that grows increasingly complex; promotes deeper understanding of international relations among our Vice Chairman David M. Rubenstein members, leaders, and the public; and lends authority, expertise, and seri- ousness of purpose to the foreign policy debate in the United States and around the world. We would like to acknowledge CFR Vice Chairman David M. Rubenstein for his ongoing support, and the Board of Direc- tors for their many contributions over the past year. We are especially thankful for the creative and pragmatic leadership of Richard N. Haass, and grateful for all that he has done and continues to do for the Council. Carla A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DIRECTING the Disorder the CFR Is the Deep State Powerhouse Undoing and Remaking Our World
    DEEP STATE DIRECTING THE Disorder The CFR is the Deep State powerhouse undoing and remaking our world. 2 by William F. Jasper The nationalist vs. globalist conflict is not merely an he whole world has gone insane ideological struggle between shadowy, unidentifiable and the lunatics are in charge of T the asylum. At least it looks that forces; it is a struggle with organized globalists who have way to any rational person surveying the very real, identifiable, powerful organizations and networks escalating revolutions that have engulfed the planet in the year 2020. The revolu- operating incessantly to undermine and subvert our tions to which we refer are the COVID- constitutional Republic and our Christian-style civilization. 19 revolution and the Black Lives Matter revolution, which, combined, are wreak- ing unprecedented havoc and destruction — political, social, economic, moral, and spiritual — worldwide. As we will show, these two seemingly unrelated upheavals are very closely tied together, and are but the latest and most profound manifesta- tions of a global revolutionary transfor- mation that has been under way for many years. Both of these revolutions are being stoked and orchestrated by elitist forces that intend to unmake the United States of America and extinguish liberty as we know it everywhere. In his famous “Lectures on the French Revolution,” delivered at Cambridge University between 1895 and 1899, the distinguished British historian and states- man John Emerich Dalberg, more com- monly known as Lord Acton, noted: “The appalling thing in the French Revolution is not the tumult, but the design. Through all the fire and smoke we perceive the evidence of calculating organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Nations 2019
    Media nations: UK 2019 Published 7 August 2019 Overview This is Ofcom’s second annual Media Nations report. It reviews key trends in the television and online video sectors as well as the radio and other audio sectors. Accompanying this narrative report is an interactive report which includes an extensive range of data. There are also separate reports for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. The Media Nations report is a reference publication for industry, policy makers, academics and consumers. This year’s publication is particularly important as it provides evidence to inform discussions around the future of public service broadcasting, supporting the nationwide forum which Ofcom launched in July 2019: Small Screen: Big Debate. We publish this report to support our regulatory goal to research markets and to remain at the forefront of technological understanding. It addresses the requirement to undertake and make public our consumer research (as set out in Sections 14 and 15 of the Communications Act 2003). It also meets the requirements on Ofcom under Section 358 of the Communications Act 2003 to publish an annual factual and statistical report on the TV and radio sector. This year we have structured the findings into four chapters. • The total video chapter looks at trends across all types of video including traditional broadcast TV, video-on-demand services and online video. • In the second chapter, we take a deeper look at public service broadcasting and some wider aspects of broadcast TV. • The third chapter is about online video. This is where we examine in greater depth subscription video on demand and YouTube.
    [Show full text]
  • SENATE—Wednesday, October 26, 2005
    October 26, 2005 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE 23679 SENATE—Wednesday, October 26, 2005 The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was pose of these amendments, and we will tion drug program that is about to called to order by the President pro announce when Senators can expect take effect. This flaw is a ticking time tempore (Mr. STEVENS). those votes. bomb for more than 6 million Ameri- I remind my colleagues that a clo- cans, for our communities and our PRAYER ture motion was filed last night on the health care providers. That fuse is The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Labor-HHS appropriations bill. That going to detonate on January 1. fered the following prayer: cloture vote will occur on Thursday We cannot allow low-income seniors Let us pray. morning. Under rule XXII, Senators and the disabled to lose their direct O God our rock, exalted above all have until 1 o’clock today to file their coverage. We cannot leave our doctors blessings and praise, the host of Heav- first-degree amendments at the desk. and hospitals and nursing homes un- en worships You. Today we praise You We will finish this bill this week. It is prepared for the biggest change in dec- for the opportunity of serving our up to the Senate to decide if we are ades. And we should not be pushing country in the Senate. Incline our going to be here late Thursday or Fri- hundreds of thousands of people who hearts to do Your will and set a guard day, but we will finish the bill.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'New Middle East,' Revised Edition
    9/29/2014 Diplomatist BILATERAL NEWS: India and Brazil sign 3 agreements during Prime Minister's visit to Brazil CONTENTS PRINT VERSION SPECIAL REPORTS SUPPLEMENTS OUR PATRONS MEDIA SCRAPBOOK Home / September 2014 The ‘New Middle East,’ Revised Edition GLOBAL CENTRE STAGE In July 2014, President Obama sent the White House’s Coordinator for the Middle East, Philip Gordon, to address the ‘Israel Conference on Peace’ in Tel-Aviv. ‘How’ Gordon asked ‘will [Israel] have peace if it is unwilling to delineate a border, end the occupation and allow for Palestinian sovereignty, security, and dignity?’ This is a good question, but Dr Emmanuel Navon asks how Israel will achieve peace if it is willing to delineate a border, end the occupation and allow for Palestinian sovereignty, security, and dignity, especially when experience, logic and deduction suggest that the West Bank would turn into a larger and more lethal version of the Gaza Strip after the Israeli withdrawal During the last war between Israel and Hamas (which officially ended with a ceasefire on August 27, 2014), US Secretary of State John Kerry inadvertently created a common ground among rivals: Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Egypt and Jordan all agreed in July 2014 that Kerry had ruined the chances of a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. Collaborating with Turkey DEFINITION and Qatar to reach a ceasefire was tantamount to calling the neighbourhood’s pyromaniac instead of the fire department to extinguish the fire. Qatar bankrolls Hamas and Turkey advocates on its behalf. While in Paris in July, Kerry was all smiles Diplomat + with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu whose boss, Recep Erdogan, recently accused Israel of genocide and compared Netanyahu to Hitler.
    [Show full text]
  • O'hanlon Gordon Indyk
    Getting Serious About Iraq 1 Getting Serious About Iraq ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Philip H. Gordon, Martin Indyk and Michael E. O’Hanlon In his 29 January 2002 State of the Union address, US President George W. Bush put the world on notice that the United States would ‘not stand aside as the world’s most dangerous regimes develop the world’s most dangerous weapons’.1 Such statements, repeated since then in various forms by the president and some of his top advisers, have rightly been interpreted as a sign of the administration’s determination to overthrow Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.2 Since the January declaration, however, attempts by the administration to put together a precise plan for Saddam’s overthrow have revealed what experience from previous administrations should have made obvious from the outset: overthrowing Saddam is easier said than done. Bush’s desire to get rid of the Iraqi dictator has so far been frustrated by the inherent difficulties of overthrowing an entrenched regime as well as a series of practical hurdles that conviction alone cannot overcome. The latter include the difficulties of organising the Iraqi opposition, resistance from Arab and European allies, joint chiefs’ concerns about the problems of over-stretched armed forces and intelligence assets and the complications caused by an upsurge in Israeli– Palestinian violence. Certainly, the United States has good reasons to want to get rid of Saddam Hussein. Saddam is a menace who has ordered the invasion of several of his neighbours, killed thousands of Kurds and Iranians with poison gas, turned his own country into a brutal police state and demonstrated an insatiable appetite for weapons of mass destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    2018Annual Report Annual Report July 1, 2017–June 30, 2018 Council on Foreign Relations 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065 tel 212.434.9400 1777 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006 tel 202.509.8400 www.cfr.org [email protected] OFFICERS DIRECTORS David M. Rubenstein Term Expiring 2019 Term Expiring 2022 Chairman David G. Bradley Sylvia Mathews Burwell Blair Effron Blair Effron Ash Carter Vice Chairman Susan Hockfield James P. Gorman Jami Miscik Donna J. Hrinak Laurene Powell Jobs Vice Chairman James G. Stavridis David M. Rubenstein Richard N. Haass Vin Weber Margaret G. Warner President Daniel H. Yergin Fareed Zakaria Keith Olson Term Expiring 2020 Term Expiring 2023 Executive Vice President, John P. Abizaid Kenneth I. Chenault Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer Mary McInnis Boies Laurence D. Fink James M. Lindsay Timothy F. Geithner Stephen C. Freidheim Senior Vice President, Director of Studies, Stephen J. Hadley Margaret (Peggy) Hamburg and Maurice R. Greenberg Chair James Manyika Charles Phillips Jami Miscik Cecilia Elena Rouse Nancy D. Bodurtha Richard L. Plepler Frances Fragos Townsend Vice President, Meetings and Membership Term Expiring 2021 Irina A. Faskianos Vice President, National Program Tony Coles Richard N. Haass, ex officio and Outreach David M. Cote Steven A. Denning Suzanne E. Helm William H. McRaven Vice President, Philanthropy and Janet A. Napolitano Corporate Relations Eduardo J. Padrón Jan Mowder Hughes John Paulson Vice President, Human Resources and Administration Caroline Netchvolodoff OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, Vice President, Education EMERITUS & HONORARY Shannon K. O’Neil Madeleine K. Albright Maurice R. Greenberg Vice President and Deputy Director of Studies Director Emerita Honorary Vice Chairman Lisa Shields Martin S.
    [Show full text]
  • John R. Mcneill University Professor Georgetown University President of the American Historical Association, 2019 Presidential Address
    2020-President_Address.indd All Pages 14/10/19 7:31 PM John R. McNeill University Professor Georgetown University President of the American Historical Association, 2019 Presidential Address New York Hilton Trianon Ballroom New York, New York Saturday, January 4, 2020 5:30 PM John R. McNeill By George Vrtis, Carleton College In fall 1998, John McNeill addressed the Georgetown University community to help launch the university’s new capital campaign. Sharing the stage with Georgetown’s president and other dignitaries, McNeill focused his comments on the two “great things” he saw going on at Georgetown and why each merited further support. One of those focal points was teaching and the need to constantly find creative new ways to inspire, share knowledge, and build intellectual community among faculty and students. The other one centered on scholarship. Here McNeill suggested that scholars needed to move beyond the traditional confines of academic disciplines laid down in the 19th century, and engage in more innovative, imaginative, and interdisciplinary research. Our intellectual paths have been very fruitful for a long time now, McNeill observed, but diminishing returns have set in, information and methodologies have exploded, and new roads beckon. To help make his point, McNeill likened contemporary scholars to a drunk person searching for his lost keys under a lamppost, “not because he lost them there but because that is where the light is.” The drunk-swirling-around-the-lamppost metaphor was classic McNeill. Throughout his academic life, McNeill has always conveyed his ideas in clear, accessible, often memorable, and occasionally humorous language. And he has always ventured into the darkness, searchlight in hand, helping us to see and understand the world and ourselves ever more clearly with each passing year.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition and Ip Policy in High-Technology Industries
    COMPETITION AND IP POLICY IN HIGH-TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES APRIL 19, 2016 CORNERSTONE RESEARCH COMPETITION AND IP POLICY IN HIGH-TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES This one-day conference will explore the latest developments at the intersections of high technology, law, and economics. Topics include: • New technologies and their implications for competition and regulation • Big data: how it changes the ways that firms compete and its antitrust effects • The impact of the America Invents Act on innovation and competition • The legal and economic challenges of the on-demand economy Wireless Guest Access in the Koret-Taube Conference Center: 1. From your list of available networks, select ID: Stanford Visitor 2. Open a browser and load any URL; you will be redirected to a visitor access page 3. Click the button to acknowledge the terms of use; your browser will then be sent to a confirmation page The visitor network offers limited bandwidth and services are limited to email, web browsing, VPN, and SSH. SIEPR | John A. and Cynthia Fry Gunn Building | Koret-Taube Conference Center 366 Galvez Street | Stanford University | Stanford, CA 94305 PROGRAM AGENDA 8:00–8:45 am BREAKFAST AND REGISTRATION 8:45–9:00 am WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION Gregory L. Rosston, Deputy Director and Senior Fellow, SIEPR; Director, Stanford Public Policy Program Michael D. Topper, Senior Vice President, Cornerstone Research 9:00–9:45 am INTERVIEW A Conversation with Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice Gregory L. Rosston, Deputy Director
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019 Belfer Center Newsletter
    Summer 2019 www.belfercenter.org OUR ONE EARTH ACTING ON THE CLIMATE CRISIS PAGES 4–5 “Our real aim should be not simply to limit the amount of climate change that occurs (mitigation), but also to reduce the actual harm to society and to ecosystems from the changes in climate that can no longer be avoided (adaptation). Limiting the harm overall will require enormous efforts in both mitigation and adaptation, all around the world.” –JOHN P. HOLDREN PLUS: Big Tech & Democracy · Ethics in Intelligence · U.S.-Russia Blueprint From the Director n today’s tight labor market, competition * * * Ifor talented young people is fierce. Here at One reason the Belfer Center has such strong Harvard Kennedy School, that means many academic impact is because of the excellence of Staff Spotlight: graduating students are entertaining several its quarterly journal, International Security, and Amanda Sardonis attractive job offers. No doubt they’ll make their its long-time editor, Sean Lynn-Jones. Sean new employers happy. retired this year after three decades of outstand- Amanda Sardonis loves and lives her work. More important than their performance, ing service, leading the journal to a repeated No. As Associate Director of the Environment and however, is the spirit of public purpose they 1 worldwide ranking. Sean is also an influential Natural Resources Program (ENRP), she sup- bring to their work. This is true for both writer and scholar: His 1998 article, “Why the ports the program’s research, manages student government and private-sector roles. United States Should Spread Democracy,” has engagement and fellowship programs—including Let’s not kid ourselves: governance is hard, become a classic.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Friedman January 27, 2010
    As Revised United States House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform “Factors Affecting Efforts to Limit Payments to AIG Counterparties” Prepared Testimony of Stephen Friedman January 27, 2010 Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Issa, and Members of the Committee, I am here today because of my great respect for Congress and the essential role that it plays in the United States Government. It was my recent privilege to serve my country in the Executive Branch as Assistant to the President for Economic Policy and Director of the National Economic Council from 2002 to 2004, and as Chairman of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board from 2006 to 2009, and I developed a renewed appreciation of our Constitutional system of checks and balances. Despite my recognition of the importance of the Committee’s inquiry, I cannot provide the Committee with any insight into the principal subject of today’s hearing—the transaction that paid AIG’s credit default swap counterparties at par. The questions raised about these transactions reflect understandable confusion about the role that a Reserve Bank’s Chairman and Board of Directors play in a Reserve Bank’s operations. Consistent with the structure created by the Federal Reserve Act, the Board of Directors of the New York Federal Reserve Bank has no role in the regulation, supervision, or oversight of banks, bank holding companies, or other financial institutions. Such responsibilities are instead carried out by the officers of the New York Federal Reserve Bank acting at the direction of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System here in Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2016 Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network Laura Osur Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Osur, Laura, "Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network" (2016). Dissertations - ALL. 448. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/448 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract When Netflix launched in April 1998, Internet video was in its infancy. Eighteen years later, Netflix has developed into the first truly global Internet TV network. Many books have been written about the five broadcast networks – NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, and the CW – and many about the major cable networks – HBO, CNN, MTV, Nickelodeon, just to name a few – and this is the fitting time to undertake a detailed analysis of how Netflix, as the preeminent Internet TV networks, has come to be. This book, then, combines historical, industrial, and textual analysis to investigate, contextualize, and historicize Netflix's development as an Internet TV network. The book is split into four chapters. The first explores the ways in which Netflix's development during its early years a DVD-by-mail company – 1998-2007, a period I am calling "Netflix as Rental Company" – lay the foundations for the company's future iterations and successes. During this period, Netflix adapted DVD distribution to the Internet, revolutionizing the way viewers receive, watch, and choose content, and built a brand reputation on consumer-centric innovation.
    [Show full text]