DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Interaction Processes: Symbolic Interaction Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Interaction Processes: Symbolic Interaction Dr Sociology 551 Social Interaction Processes: Symbolic Interaction Dr. Brandy Simula COURSE DESCRIPTION This course approaches the dynamics of social interaction from the symbolic interactionist (SI) perspective. The course provides an overview of both classic and contemporary works in this tradition. In the first section of the course, we will focus on the development of the SI perspective and will read major theorists including Mead, Cooley, Blumer, Goffman, and Stryker. In the second section of the course we will cover recent theoretical developments, focusing on topics including stigma, the looking-glass self, reflected appraisals, identity processes, identity and stress, identity negotiation, and emotions. Throughout the course, we will focus on how selves and identities are created, modified, and enacted through interactions with others. COURSE MATERIALS G.H. Mead. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Herbert Blumer. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Berkeley: University of California Press. Erving Goffman. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday. Erving Goffman. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press. Sheldon Stryker. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism. Caldwell, NJ: The Blackburn Press. Erving Goffman.. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster. Suggested reference texts: Charon, Joel. 2009. Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Reynolds, Larry and Nancy Herman-Kinney, eds. 2004. Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press. Course Requirements 1. A research guide on one of the major theorists (30%) You will prepare a research guide on one of the major theorists we will read in the first section of the course (weeks 2-5). Your research guide should include: A brief summary (2-3 pages) of the works we read by that theorist. A 2-3 page review essay situating the theorist you have chosen and her/his work in the broader field of SI and in sociology more generally. Consider how s/he drew on extant sociological theory as well as how her/his work has influenced SI and sociology. What major concepts, methodological approaches, and/or substantive areas did her/his work contribute to? How have other scholars used her/his work? Include a brief (no more than 2 pages) compilation of teaching resources. Imagine how you would teach 1 this theorist in an undergraduate theory or social psychology course. What activities and/or assignments would you use? What examples could you draw on in lectures? How would you make this material accessible and relevant to your students? 2. Two discussion facilitations and critical review papers (2 @ 15% each) Each student will facilitate class discussions twice during the semester (one or both discussion facilitations may be done in pairs depending on the size of the class). Your discussion facilitation should begin with a brief overview of the readings (5-10 minutes) and you should then use the discussion questions you prepare to facilitate a discussion among seminar participants. You will also write a 5-page critical review essay of the works we read on the days you facilitate seminar discussions. Please turn in a hard copy of your discussion questions and critical review essay on the days you facilitate discussions. 3. Active and Informed Participation 10% The success of this seminar depends on the active and informed participation of all seminar members. This means reading carefully and preparing questions and comments in advance. 4. Final paper (30%) Your final paper will give you the opportunity to apply an interactionist theory to a substantive topic of interest. Papers should be 15-20 pages. A one page proposal including abstract (200-300 words) and selected working bibliography is due November 20th A hard copy of your final paper is due in my mailbox by 5pm on Monday, December 17th SCHEDULE Recommended readings are review and/or reference pieces and are optional for both graduate and undergraduate students. Sep 4 Introductory Discussion Sep 11 George Herbert Mead Mead, G.H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 42-82; 100-125; 135-200; 273-280; 298-302. Couch, Carl. 1989. “Becoming Social.” Pp. 1-15 in Social Processes and Relationships. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Sep 18 Herbert Blumer Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Berkeley: University of California. Chapters 1, 7, 8, and 9. Snow, David A. 2001. ‘Extending and Broadening Blumer’s Conceptualization of Symbolic Interactionism.” Symbolic Interaction 24: 367-377. 2 Sep 25 Erving Goffman Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday. Chapters I and III. Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual. New York: Pantheon Books. Chapter 1: On Face Work. Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press. Chapters 1, 2, 6, and 12-13. Recommended: Scheff, Thomas. 2005. “Looking-Glass Self: Goffman as Symbolic Interactionist.” Symbolic Interaction 28: 147-166. Oct 2 Sheldon Stryker Stryker, Sheldon. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism. Caldwell, NJ: The Blackburn Press. Stryker, Sheldon and Kevin Vryan. 2003. “The Symbolic Interactionist Frame.” Pp. 3-28 in Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by John Delamater. New York: Kluwer Academic. Oct 9 Stigma Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster. Pp. 1-19; 73-104 Han, Chong-suk. 2009. “Asian Girls Are Prettier: Gendered Presentations as Stigma Management among Gay Asian Men.” Symbolic Interaction 32: 106-122. Thoits, Peggy. 2011. “Resisting the Stigma of Mental Illness.” Social Psychology Quarterly 74: 6-28. Granberg, Ellen. 2011. “‘Now my ‘old self’ is thin’: Stigma Exits after Weight Loss.” Social Psychology Quarterly 74: 29-52. Link, Bruce and Jo Phelan. 2001. “Conceptualizing Stigma.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 363-385. Oct 16 Fall Break Oct 23 Construction and Presentation of Self Waskul, Dennis. 2007. “Cyberspace and Cyberselves.” Pp. 119-128 in Inside Social Life, 5th edition, edited by Spencer Cahill. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing. Ramirez, Michael. 2006. “My Dog’s Just Like Me: Dog Ownership as Gender Display.” Symbolic Interaction 29: 373-391. Ford, Kristie. 2011. “Doing Fake Masculinity, Being Real Men: Present and Future Constructions of Self among Black College Men.” Symbolic Interaction 34: 38-62. Martin, Karin. 2009. “Normalizing Heterosexuality: Mothers’ Assumptions, Talk, and Strategies with Young Children.” American Sociological Review 74:190-207. 3 Giordano, Peggy, Monica Longmore, Wendy Manning, and Miriam Northcutt. 2009. “Adolescent Identities and Sexual Behavior: An Examination of Anderson’s Player Hypothesis.” Social Forces 87:1813-1844. Recommended: Weigert, Andrew and Viktor Gecas. 2003. “Self.” Chapter 10 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by Larry Reynolds and Nancy Herman-Kinney. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press. Oct 30 Looking Glass Self and Reflected Appraisals Cooley, Charles Horton. 1983. “Looking-Glass Self.” Pp.183-185 in Human Nature and the Social Order by C.H. Cooley. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Felson, Richard. 1985. “Reflected Appraisal and the Development of Self.” Social Psychology Quarterly 48:71-78. Killian, Caitlin and Cathryn Johnson. 2006. “I’m Not an Immigrant!”: Resistance, Redefinition, and the Role of Resources in Identity Work.” Social Psychology Quarterly 69: 60-80. McCall, George. 2003. “The Me and the Not-Me: Positive and Negative Poles of Identity.” Pp. 11-25 in Advances in Identity and Research, edited by Peter Burke, Richard Serpe, and Peggy Thoits. New York: Kluwer/ Plenum. Waskul, Dennis and Phillip Vannini. 2008. “Smell, Odor, and Somatic Work: Sense-making and Memory Management.” Social Psychology Quarterly 71:53-71. Nov 6 Looking Glass, cont’d. Milkie, Melissa. 1999. “Social Comparisons, Reflected Appraisals, and Mass Media: The Impact of Pervasive Beauty Images on Black and White Girls’ Self Concepts.” Social Psychology Quarterly 62: 190- 210. Lee, James. 1998. “Which Kids Can ‘Become’ scientists? Effects of Gender, Self-Concepts, and Perceptions of Scientists.” Social Psychology Quarterly 61:199-219. Khanna, Nikki. “2010. ‘If You’re Half Black, You’re Just Black’: Reflected Appraisal and the Persistence of the One Drop Rule.” The Sociological Quarterly 51:96-121. Harris, David and Jeremiah Joseph Sim. 2002. “Who is Multiracial? Assessing the Complexity of Lived Race.” American Sociological Review 67:614-627. Markowitz, Fed, Beth Angell, and Jan Greenberg. 2011. “Stigma, Reflected Appraisals, and Recovery Outcomes in Mental Illness.” Social Psychology Quarterly 74: 14-165. Nov 13 Identity Processes: Identity Control Theory 4 Stets, Jan and Peter Burke. 2005. “Identity Verification, Control and Aggression in Marriage.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68:160- 178. Burke, Peter. 2006. “Identity Change.” Social Psychology Quarterly 69:81-96. Cast, Alicia D. and Allison Cantwell. 2007. “Identity Change in Newly Married Couples: Effects of Positive and Negative Feedback.” Social Psychology Quarterly 70:172-185. Stryker, Sheldon and Peter Burke. 2000. “The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 63: 284-297. Stets, Jan and Michael Carter. 2011. “The Moral Self: Applying Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 74: 192-215. Recommended: Vryan, Kevin, Patricia Adler and Peter Adler. 2003. “Identity.” Chapter 15 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by Larry
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contemporary Social Theory
    CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL THEORY General Editor: ANTHONY GIDDENS This series aims to create a forum for debate between different theoretical and philosophical traditions in the social sciences. As well as covering broad schools of thought, the series will also concentrate upon the work of particular thinkers whose ideas have had a major impact on social science (these books appear under the sub-series title of 'Theoretical Traditions in the Social Sciences'). The series is not limited to abstract theoretical discussion - it will also include more substantive works on contemporary capitalism, the state, politics and other subject areas. Published titles Tony Bilton, Kevin Bonnett, Philip Jones, Ken Sheard, Michelle Stanworth and Andrew Webster, Introductory Sociology Simon Clarke, Marx, Marginalism and Modern Sociology Emile Durkheim, The Division of Labour in Society (trans. W. D. Halls) Emile Durkheim, The Rules of Sociological Method (ed. Steven Lukes, trans. W. D. Halls) Boris Frankel, Beyond the State? Anthony Giddens, A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism Anthony Giddens, Central Problems in Social Theory Anthony Giddens, Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory Anthony Giddens and David Held (eds), Classes, Power and Conflict: Classical and Contemporary Debates Geoffrey Ingham, Capitalism Divided? Terry Johnson, Christopher Dandeker and Clive Ashworth, The Structure of Social Theory Douglas Kellner, Herbert Marcuse and the Crisis of Marxism Jorge Larrain, Marxism and Ideology Ali Rattansi, Marx and the Division of Labour Gerry
    [Show full text]
  • Blumer's Symbolic Interactionism: Methodological Implications
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 1-1-1971 Blumer's symbolic interactionism: Methodological implications. Jan Spurway Marks University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Marks, Jan Spurway, "Blumer's symbolic interactionism: Methodological implications." (1971). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 6691. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/6691 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. - BLUMER'S SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM: METHODOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS A THESIS 'SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR JAN SPURWAY MARKS UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR 1971 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: EC53094 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying “Going Concerns”: Everett C. Hughes on Method by Rick Helmes-Hayes Doi: 10.2383/32714
    Il Mulino - Rivisteweb Rick Helmes-Hayes Studying ”Going Concerns”: Everett Hughes On Method (doi: 10.2383/32714) Sociologica (ISSN 1971-8853) Fascicolo 2, maggio-giugno 2010 Ente di afferenza: () Copyright c by Societ`aeditrice il Mulino, Bologna. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Per altre informazioni si veda https://www.rivisteweb.it Licenza d’uso L’articolo `emesso a disposizione dell’utente in licenza per uso esclusivamente privato e personale, senza scopo di lucro e senza fini direttamente o indirettamente commerciali. Salvo quanto espressamente previsto dalla licenza d’uso Rivisteweb, `efatto divieto di riprodurre, trasmettere, distribuire o altrimenti utilizzare l’articolo, per qualsiasi scopo o fine. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Flashback Studying “Going Concerns”: Everett C. Hughes On Method by Rick Helmes-Hayes doi: 10.2383/32714 What principles shall guide us in the discovery of men’s secrets; what, in the telling of them? [Hughes 1971 [1956], 431] xIntroduction In North America, during the middle decades of the Twentieth century, the work of Everett Hughes (1897-1983) was central to a wide range of disciplinary sub- specialities, including race and ethnic relations, work and occupations, and educa- tion. Beginning in the early 1970s, he became subject to considerable critical atten- tion from US scholars eager to examine his legacy [Baker 1976; Becker et al. 1968; Burns 1980; Coser 1994; Daniels 1972; Faught 1980; Fielding 2005; Heath 1984; Holmstrom 1984; Reinharz 1995; Riesman 1983; Riesman and Becker 1984; Simpson 1972; Strauss 1996; Weiss 1997]. In Europe, by contrast, Hughes had no such pro- file. Only after his death in 1983, in the context of a growing, if belated, interest in the general legacy of the Chicago School [see Rémy and Voyé 1974; Grafmeyer and Joseph [eds.] 1979], did French and, now, Italian scholars begin to pay appreciat- ive attention to his work [Hannerz 1983; Peneff 1984; Winkin 1988; Coulon 1992; Sociétés Contemporaines 27 [juillet] 1997, entire issue; Wax 2000; Chapoulie 2001].
    [Show full text]
  • Symbolic Interactionism Mark V
    English Technical Reports and White Papers English 2015 Symbolic Interactionism Mark V. Redmond Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/engl_reports Part of the Interpersonal and Small Group Communication Commons Recommended Citation Redmond, Mark V., "Symbolic Interactionism" (2015). English Technical Reports and White Papers. 4. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/engl_reports/4 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the English at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Technical Reports and White Papers by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Symbolic Interactionism Communication Context Interpersonal, Small Group, Cultural. Questions It Addresses in Our Every Day Lives: 1. How our interactions with others affect our sense of self. 2. The importance of symbols/language to society. 3. Where our mind and humanness comes from. Theory in a Nutshell ● We acquire symbols from interactions with society/other people. ● Acquiring symbols allows us to develop a sense of self and a mind (we think by way of symbols). ● Societies exist because people are able to interact with each another through symbols. Visualization of Symbolic Interaction Theory Mind Symbol Self Society “Symbols include words and many objects, and almost all acts around others contain a symbolic element. Words are the most important symbols, making human thinking possible.” Joel M. Charon (2007, p. 58). Introduction and Overview Let’s start with a simple definition of what a symbol is. A symbol is a stimuli that is abstract and arbitrary to which meaning is applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Bibliography on the History of American Sociology
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 2005 Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology Michael R. Hill [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Hill, Michael R., "Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology" (2005). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 348. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/348 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Hill, Michael R., (Compiler). 2005. Centennial Bibliography of the History of American Sociology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. CENTENNIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN SOCIOLOGY Compiled by MICHAEL R. HILL Editor, Sociological Origins In consultation with the Centennial Bibliography Committee of the American Sociological Association Section on the History of Sociology: Brian P. Conway, Michael R. Hill (co-chair), Susan Hoecker-Drysdale (ex-officio), Jack Nusan Porter (co-chair), Pamela A. Roby, Kathleen Slobin, and Roberta Spalter-Roth. © 2005 American Sociological Association Washington, DC TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: Each part is separately paginated, with the number of pages in each part as indicated below in square brackets. The total page count for the entire file is 224 pages. To navigate within the document, please use navigation arrows and the Bookmark feature provided by Adobe Acrobat Reader.® Users may search this document by utilizing the “Find” command (typically located under the “Edit” tab on the Adobe Acrobat toolbar).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Volume 17, No. 2, Art. 12 May 2016 Ways of Telling About Society Howard S. Becker in Conversation With Reiner Keller Key words: Abstract: In the following conversation, Howard S. BECKER talks about his lifelong travel with and Chicago sociology; between sociology and jazz music, his professional training as a sociologist, the hazards of a field work; career, and his involvement with photography and performance. He reflects on the different ways photography; used by artists and sociologists to tell solid stories about social phenomena, and tells a compelling performance; art; account in its own right about the methodology of sound sociological field work and case study labeling theory; research. By explaining core concepts of his sociological perspective (such as the concept of methodology; labeling and "doing things together") and referring to concrete research examples, BECKER in all doing things modesty fully engages with what could be called today's sociological imagination, leaving narrow together; social disciplinary constraints behind in order to explore society with curiosity, using methodologically worlds; symbolic sensible but nevertheless refreshing approaches. interactionism; case design The audio file is accessible from http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.49829. Table of Contents 1. Writing Notes/Playing Notes 2. "Meet Me in Kansas City Tomorrow" 3. "Twenty-Eight Percent" 4. Photography 5. Data, Evidence, Ideas 6. Doing and Undoing Things Together 7. No Chicago School! 8. Telling About Sociology References Authors Citation Biographical Note1 Howard S. BECKER, born in Chicago in 1928, is among the major figures of international contemporary sociology. Throughout his life, doing sociology and (playing) jazz music have been closely related.
    [Show full text]
  • Alec Campbell [email protected] Office Hours M 8-9 AM and by Apt Office A242
    Introduction to Sociology SOC 101 | Fall 2015 C164 | TTh 12:30-2:40pm Alec Campbell [email protected] Office Hours M 8-9 AM and by apt Office A242 Course Outcomes: After completing this class, students should be able to: Critically examine the social landscape in which you live and how life experiences differ according to race, class, gender and sexuality. Identify the ways in which cultural and social institutions shape the everyday experiences of individuals, groups and communities. Describe fundamental sociological concepts, and theories, and apply them to real-life situations. Texts There is no textbook for this class and no books to purchase. All class resources can be accessed through canvas or will be provided by the professor. Policies Student Attendance: Attendance is essential to your success in this course. I will take attendance every day and you will receive 10 points if you are in class on time and 5 points if you arrive late. There are 22 class meetings and a maximum of 200 attendance points so it is possible to miss two classes and still receive full credit for attendance. I will make accommodations for college sanctioned events (athletic contests, artistic performances, conferences) provided that you inform me of your anticipated absence in a timely fashion. An example of timely notification can be found in the tentative schedule. I will be attending a college sanctioned conference on November 5th and class is cancelled on that day. In any case, you will be responsible for material covered in your absence and for turning in any work due on the day of your absence.
    [Show full text]
  • G. H. Mead in the History of Sociological Ideas
    Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 42(1), 19–39 Winter 2006 Published online in Wiley Interscience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002 /jhbs.20136 © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. G. H. MEAD IN THE HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGICAL IDEAS FILIPE CARREIRA DA SILVA My aim is to discuss the history of the reception of George Herbert Mead’s ideas in soci- ology. After discussing the methodological debate between presentism and historicism, I address the interpretations of those responsible for Mead’s inclusion in the sociological canon: Herbert Blumer, Jürgen Habermas, and Hans Joas. In the concluding section, I as- sess these reconstructions of Mead’s thought and suggest an alternative more consistent with my initial methodological remarks. In particular, I advocate a reconstruction of Mead’s ideas that apprehends simultaneously its evolution over time and its thematic breadth. Such a historically minded reconstruction can be not only a useful corrective to possible anachronisms incurred by contemporary social theorists, but also a fruitful re- source for their theory-building endeavors. Only then can meaningful and enriching dia- logue with Mead begin. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. SOCIOLOGY AND THE HISTORY OF IDEAS This article argues that George Herbert Mead (1863–1931) should be treated as a soci- ological classic. This assertion, however, requires justification. In effect, beyond the sociohis- torical nature of the canon-formation process (which is dealt with later in the article), a justi- fication of the above assertion has to take into consideration three different dimensions, which can be formulated as three correlated questions. Hence, if one wishes to study Mead as a clas- sic, one has to ask: “What is a classic?” “What are the functions that a classic fulfills?” and “How should such writings be analyzed?” A number of possible answers can be given to the first question.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology and Poetry: an Introduction Michael R
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 2006 Sociology and Poetry: An Introduction Michael R. Hill University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Hill, Michael R., "Sociology and Poetry: An Introduction" (2006). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 356. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/356 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Hill, Michael R. 2006. “Sociology and Poetry: An Introduction.” Sociological Origins 4 (Spring): 66-68. THE SOCIOLOGY OF POETRY: A SYMPOSIUM Sociology and Poetry: An Introduction 1 Michael R. Hill OETRY IS A SOCIOLOGICAL REALITY. It has an institutional location within society, plays an important part in everyday social interaction, and promises very real results as a site Pfor conceiving and explicating alternative social constellations. Simultaneously, poetry is sometimes difficult to grasp by those of decidedly a prosaic bent, and this includes too many sociologists. As poetry shapes — and is in turn shaped by — the active
    [Show full text]
  • Boys in White: Um Clássico Da Pesquisa Qualitativa Completa Cinquenta Anos
    Boys in white: um clássico da pesquisa qualitativa completa cinquenta anos NUNES, Everardo Duarte; BARROS, Nelson Filice de. Boys in white: um clássico da pesquisa qualitativa completa cinquenta anos. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, v.21, n.4, out.-dez. 2014, p.1179-1196. Resumo O artigo analisa o livro Boys in white: student culture in medical school, de Boys in white: um clássico Howard S. Becker, Blanche Geer, Everett C. Hughes e Anselm Strauss, considerado da pesquisa qualitativa um dos modelos de pesquisa qualitativa em sociologia. A análise aborda as completa cinquenta anos trajetórias dos autores, do livro, da pesquisa qualitativa e dos estudantes de medicina, enfatizando sua importância Boys in white: a classic of nas origens da sociologia médica e da sociologia da educação médica. Na qualitative research turns 50 trajetória dos autores são apresentados aspectos biobibliográficos; na da pesquisa qualitativa, o modo como essa metodologia de investigação atravessa a construção do trabalho de campo; e na dos estudantes, sua forma de atravessar os primeiros anos da escola médica e construir sua própria “cultura do estudante”. Palavras-chave: Boys in white; estudante de medicina; pesquisa qualitativa; sociologia médica; sociologia da educação médica. Abstract This article analyzes Boys in white: student culture in medical school by Howard S. Becker, Blanche Geer, Everett C. Hughes and Anselm Strauss, considered a model of qualitative research in sociology. Everardo Duarte Nunes The analysis investigates the trajectories of the authors, the book, qualitative analysis, Professor, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas/ Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp). and the medical students, emphasizing Rua Tessália Vieira de Camargo, 126 their importance in the origins of medical 13083-887 – Campinas – SP – Brasil sociology and the sociology of medical [email protected] education.
    [Show full text]
  • Resituating Erving Goffman: from Stigma Power to Black Power
    Resituating Erving Goffman: From Stigma Power to Black Power Abstract This paper offers a critical re-reading of the understanding of stigma forged by the North American sociologist Erving Goffman in his influential Stigma: Notes on the Management of a Spoiled Identity (1963). One of the most widely read and cited sociologists in history, Goffman was already famous when Stigma was published in 1963. His previous books were best-sellers and Stigma alone has sold an astonishing 800,000 copies in the fifty years since its publication. Given its considerable influence, it is surprising how little sustained engagement there has been with the historicity of Goffman’s account. This paper resituates Goffman’s conceptualisation of stigma within the historical context of Jim Crow and the Black freedom struggles that were shaking “the social interaction order” to its foundations at the very moment he crafted his account. It is the contention of this paper that these explosive political movements against the ‘humiliations of racial discrimination’ invite revision of Goffman’s decidedly apolitical account of stigma (Robinson, 2000, p. 318). This historical revision of Goffman’s stigma concept builds on an existing body of critical work on ‘the relationship between race, segregation and the epistemology of sociology within the United States’ (Bhambra, 2014). Throughout, it reads Goffman’s Stigma through the lens of “Black Sociology”, a field of knowledge that here designates not only formal sociological scholarship, but political manifestos, journalism, creative writing, oral histories and memoirs. It is the argument of this paper that placing Goffman’s concept of stigma into critical dialogue with Black epistemologies of stigma allows for a timely reconceptualisation of stigma as governmental technologies of de-humanisation that have long been collectively resisted from below.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER THREE the Concept of Culture in Sociology: Knowledge Base II
    1 CHAPTER THREE The Concept of Culture in Sociology: Knowledge Base II We saw in the last chapter that by the middle of the 20th century anthropologists influenced by Franz Boas and sociologists influenced by Talcott Parsons were in agreement on certain key points. One was that cultures are formal, objectively describable systems of meaning, and another was that these meanings really matter — that is, cultures shape behavior as well as reflect it. They were also agreed that cultures are what certain social groups have, not what they are or how they function. However, the discourse of both disciplines changed during the 1960s and 70s. Anthropologists began to factor into their ethnographies a group’s social, economic, and political arrangements as well as the standpoint from which they themselves, as members of dominant cultural groups, observe, report, and theorize about cultures other than their own. Sociologists, already well aware of the importance of social positions and hierarchies of wealth and political power, found it convenient to soften if not erase the standard anthropological distinction between cultures and social groups as they struggled to make sense of the increasingly visible conflicts between classes, ethnic groups, and other sorts of social collectives such as the abled and disabled. As multiculturalist educators LaBelle and Ward (1996) have explained, the term culture “evolved from its use in anthropology as a way to characterize the lifeways of a racial and ethnic population whose existence could be carved off and made independent from other groups, to a more general term implying some sharing of identity, goals, and status” (p.
    [Show full text]