DOCSLIB.ORG

Transit Center District Survey San Francisco, California Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transit Center District Survey San Francisco, California Final TRANSIT CENTER DISTRICT SURVEY SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FINAL PREPARED BY KELLEY & VERPLANCK FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 9, 2008 KELLEY & VERPLANCK HISTORICAL RESOURCES CONSULTING 2912 DIAMOND STREET #330, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94131 415.337.5824 // WWW.KVPCONSULTING.COM Historic Context Statement Transit Center District Survey San Francisco, California TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 A. PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................. 2 B. DEFINITION OF GEOGRAPHICAL AREA ......................................................................................... 2 C. IDENTIFICATION OF HISTORIC CONTEXTS AND PERIODS OF SIGNIFICANCE .................................... 3 II. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 4 III. IDENTIFICATION OF EXISTING SURVEYS, STUDIES AND REPORTS................................ 5 A. HERE TODAY (JUNIOR LEAGUE OF SAN FRANCISCO) ................................................................... 5 B. 1976 CITYWIDE ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY .................................................................................. 5 C. SAN FRANCISCO ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE .............................................................................. 5 D. ARTICLE 10 OF THE SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING CODE ................................................................ 6 E. ARTICLE 11 OF THE SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING CODE/DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN........................... 7 F. UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDING (UMB) SURVEY................................................................ 10 G. NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES .............................................................................. 10 H. SECTION 106 AND OTHER TECHNICAL REPORTS....................................................................... 12 IV. HISTORIC CONTEXT.............................................................................................................. 13 A. PREHISTORIC AND EARLY CONTACT ERA: PRE-1776................................................................. 13 B. EUROPEAN SETTLEMENT – SPANISH AND MEXICAN PERIODS: 1776-1846.................................. 14 C. EARLY AMERICAN SETTLEMENT: LAND SUBDIVISION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT: 1847-1865 ..... 15 D. INDUSTRIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: 1866-1906 ....................................................... 24 E. RECONSTRUCTION: 1907-1929................................................................................................ 31 F. DEPRESSION AND WORLD WAR II: 1930-1945.......................................................................... 36 G. POST-WAR REDEVELOPMENT: 1946-1984................................................................................ 40 F. PRESERVATION AND POSTMODERNISM: 1985-2000 .................................................................. 48 V. DEFINITION OF PROPERTY TYPES ...................................................................................... 52 A. RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS .......................................................................................................... 52 B. COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.......................................................................................................... 54 C. INSTITUTIONAL......................................................................................................................... 62 VI. RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................ 63 A. SIGNIFICANCE AND REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS ................................................................... 63 B. POTENTIAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS .............................................................................................. 64 C. AREAS REQUIRING FUTURE WORK ........................................................................................... 66 VII. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 72 VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY.................................................................................................................... 73 APPENDIX ........................................................................................................................................ A. TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... B. DISTRICT FORM ........................................................................................................................... C. DPR 523 A AND B FORMS ........................................................................................................... June 9, 2008 Kelley & VerPlanck Historic Context Statement Transit Center District Survey San Francisco, California I. INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE As part of ongoing long-range planning efforts in the area, the City and County of San Francisco has contracted with Kelley & VerPlanck Historical Resources Consulting (KVP) to survey the Transit Center District Area and prepare a Historic Context Statement that summarizes historical patterns of development, describes existing historic resources, and examines the cumulative impact of several major new projects in the Plan Area. The Transit Center District Plan, currently being implemented by the San Francisco Planning Department, is an outgrowth of the 1985 Downtown Plan, in particular the latter document’s policy of extending the city’s urban core south of Market Street. The plan will result in new planning policies and controls for land use, urban form, building design, and improvements to private and publicly owned properties to enhance the public realm. The Transit Center District Plan covers a section of the eastern South of Market Area (SOMA) bounded by Market, Main, Tehama, and New Montgomery streets. At its center is the 1939 Transbay Terminal, a commuter bus station slated to be demolished and replaced with a new office tower and multi-modal transit center. In addition to the proposed 850’ to 1,200 Transit Tower, there are at least seven other privately owned development projects anticipated for the near future in the surrounding area, including an 850’ tower at 350 Mission Street, a 1,200’ tower at 50 1st Street, the 675’ Palace Hotel addition at 2 New Montgomery Street, a 600’-800’ tower at 177-187 Fremont Street, a 500’ tower at 509 Howard Street, a 435’ tower at 222 2nd Street, and an 800’ tower on the north side of Howard Street between 1st and 2nd streets.1 This Historic Context Statement is organized into eight sections, beginning with Section I, Introduction. Section II, Methodology, describes how the survey and Historic Context Statement were researched and prepared. Section III, Identification of Existing Surveys, Studies and Reports, discusses in depth prior survey work in the area and all previously identified historic resources. Section IV, Historic Context, describes important historic events and patterns of events that have contributed to the evolution of the survey area. Section V, Definition of Property Types, defines common property types found in the survey area. Section VI, Recommendations, analyzes the impact of proposed projects in the survey area and proposes an expanded Second and New Montgomery Historic District. The report concludes with Section VII, Conclusion, and Section VIII, Bibliography. B. DEFINITION OF GEOGRAPHICAL AREA The geographical area under study encompasses the entire Transit Center District Plan Area and several surrounding blocks where new construction is anticipated. At the heart of the survey area is the Transbay Terminal Transit Center, the centerpiece of the Transbay Redevelopment Area. The Transbay Redevelopment Area is bounded roughly by Mission, Main, Folsom, and 2nd streets. The survey area itself is somewhat larger, extending east from 3rd Street (including the first parcel on the west side of 3rd Street) to Main Street on the east (including the first parcel on the east side of Main), and from the south side of Market Street on the north to the north side of Folsom Street on the south. The southern boundary is irregularly configured to exclude the Redevelopment Agency’s Zone One-Transbay Downtown Residential area (Figure 1). The survey area is generally flat, although the grade rises steadily uphill toward the south where it meets Rincon Hill. Prior to the Gold Rush of 1848-49, much of the survey area was submerged, including nearly everything east of 1st Street. West of 1st Street, most of the survey area was occupied by sand dunes interspersed with narrow wooded valleys. Grading and filling operations gradually erased these natural features in preparation for development. Presently, the entire 1 San Francisco Planning Department, “Downtown Proposed or Potential Projects Exceeding Current Height Limit” (San Francisco: unpublished map, 2007). -2- June 9, 2008 Kelley & VerPlanck. Historic Context Statement Transit Center District Survey San Francisco, California survey area is thoroughly urbanized. Much of the eastern portion of the survey area has been gradually redeveloped by private capital to the extent that very few pre-1960 resources remain east of 1st Street. Concentrations of historic post-1906 Earthquake masonry and wood-frame
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Engineer's Report Prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer Certified by the State of California.3
    SECTION 10: ASSESSMENT ENGINEER’S REPORT Downtown Community Benefit District Including the Historic Financial District and Jackson Square of San Francisco and South Side of Market Street Formed under the California Streets and Highway Code Section 36600 et seq. Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994, Augmented by Article 15 of the San Francisco Business and Tax Regulations Code DISTRICT ASSESSMENT ENGINEER’S REPORT Prepared by Edward V. Henning California Registered Professional Engineer # 26549 Edward Henning & Associates April 15, 2019 V 3 1 DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY BENEFIT DISTRICT – ENGINEER’S REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATION ...............................................................................................3 ENGINEER’S REPORT: SECTION A: Legislative and Judicial Review ............................................................4 SECTION B: Programs, Improvements and Activities ..............................................7 SECTION C: District Boundaries ................................................................................9 SECTION D: Proportional Benefits ...........................................................................13 SECTION E: Special and General Benefits ...............................................................13 SECTION F: Program, Improvement and Activity Costs .......................................19 SECTION G: Assessment Methodolgy .......................................................................22 SECTION H: Assessment Roll ....................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Sales Activity on the Rise
    Research & Forecast Report SAN FRANCISCO | OFFICE MARKET Q2 | 2018 Investment Sales Activity > VACANCY The overall vacancy rate shed 40 basis points to 6.1 percent and continues to reflect historic lows for San Francisco. In the City Class A assets continue to drive market absorption with over 2.8 million square feet year-to- on the Rise date. This has translated into the Class A vacancy rate dropping 40 basis points to 6.0 percent. Vacant sublease space remained flat during the past three months at 0.8 percent. The key driver for the vacancy shrinking during the first half of Cruise Automation snaps this year was the South Financial District which has posted 2.3 million square up the Dropbox sublease feet of net absorption which saw its vacancy rate drop 270 basis points since the Northwood Investors space at 333 & 345 beginning of the year to 4.6 percent. purchased 123 Mission Brannan Street as well as Street for $290 million 301 Brannan Street ($839 psf) > LEASING VOLUME San Francisco experienced a surge of leasing activity during the second quarter of the year which translated into nearly 2.8 million square feet of transactions closing. Technology companies continue to gobble up space in the City and their appetite for space doesn’t seem to be quenched. Four deals closed over 100,000 square feet this quarter and all these deals were companies securing expansion space. The market experienced the largest lease Facebook secures the largest lease in ever signed in San Francisco when Facebook leased all 773,000 square feet at the City’s history, 250 Howard Street (Park Tower).
    [Show full text]
  • The Investment Landscape PRIEST CLAY ST
    FISHERMAN'S P WHARF JEFFERSON ST. P P P P P P BEACH ST. P P P P P NORTHPOINT ST. COLUMBUS ST P P . P P BAY ST. BAY ST. ST . AY E VANDEWATER ST. RT MIDW HA P BRET WORDEN ST FRANCISCO ST. FRANCISCO ST. THE EMBARCADERO P WATER ST. HOUSTON ST. PFEIFFER ST. AIR ST BELL CHESTNUT ST. CHESTNUT ST. ST A VENARD P . ST CULEBR WINTHRO NEWELL P 101 LOMBARD ST. LOMBARD ST. P . TELEGRAPH STONE BLACK HILL JANSEN ST GREENWICH ST. GREENWICH ST. T E L E ROACH ST G VALPARAISO ST. R A HARRIS PL. P 101 H RUSSIAN HILL B L V TRIDGE D . AT FILBERT ST. FILBERT ST. HAVENS ST. REDFIELD ALLADIN TER. E ALLEN ST. HASTINGS MOOR MARION PL BLACK PL UNION ST. UNION ST. P WARNER SHAR ROCKLAND . RUSSELL ST. MACONDRAY LN. P DELGADO . P . HAMLIN EASTMAN ST ST Y GREEN ST. TH ST GREEN ST. VE. VE. ST . ST . A . A ST ST ST T RY T A ON ST . VENWOR VI BONITA ST. TTE TA POWELL YLOR ST GRAN N NESS P POLK ST MONTGOMER LEA FRON BA OCKT JONES ST HYDE ST LARKIN ST GOUGH ST WHITE ST KEARNY TA MASON ST OC SANSOME ST VA FRANKLIN ST ST RUSSIAN HILL VALLEJO ST. VALLEJO ST. P . P WALDO GLOVER ST. VIS ST DA BROADWAY BROADWAY S . CYRU ST BERNHARD ST. LYNCH ST. YNE PL COLUMBUS ST SALMON ST WA HIMMELMAN ST MORRELL PACIFIC AVE. PACIFIC AVE. K . P P . BURGOYNE McCORMAC . PL AUBURN ST P LL WA JACKSON ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 96.4% Total Leased Occupancy Paramount Group, Inc
    2018 ANNUAL REPORT 96.4% TOTAL LEASED OCCUPANCY PARAMOUNT GROUP, INC. // ANNUAL REPORT 2018 01 11.9MM TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 02 PARAMOUNT GROUP, INC. // ANNUAL REPORT 2018 TO OUR LEASING continues to be robust and availability is scarce, Leasing and a hands-on approach to managing so we are confident in our position in the market. SHAREHOLDERS our assets remains one of Paramount’s greatest strengths and key differentiators. 2018 was The significant outperformance in San Francisco another in a series of successful years for our and more specifically the success we have had at leasing team since we came public. We signed One Front Street and 50 Beale Street were key leases on just over one million square feet of factors that led us to increase our exposure in space, well ahead of our original guidance of San Francisco with the acquisition of 111 Sutter between 500,000 to 700,000 square feet we Street. More on that shortly. expected at the beginning of the year. All that We ended the year in Washington, D.C. at 98.0% leasing increased our same store leased leased. Parts of the market may be challenged, Once again, with great pride, I can report that occupancy by 310 basis points to 96.4%. To top it but our strategy to concentrate on Class A Paramount continues to meet or exceed our off, we did all that leasing at robust cash mark-to- assets in certain key locations within the CBD goals in executing on our business plan. Those markets of positive 13.3%.
    [Show full text]
  • After Latin American Studies: a Guide to Graduate Study and Employment for Latin Americanists
    AFTER LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES: A GUIDE TO GRADUATE STUDY AND EMPLOYMENT FOR LATIN AMERICANISTS by SHIRLEY A. KREGAR and JORGE NALLIM Revised Edition Fall 2000 LATIN AMERICAN MONOGRAPH & DOCUMENT SERIES #10 Published by the Center for Latin American Studies University Center for International Studies 4E04 Wesley W. Posvar Hall University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15260 Telephone: 412-648-7392; Fax: 412-648-2199 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.ucis.pitt.edu/clas/ AUTHOR'S NOTE Shirley A. Kregar is Associate Director of Academic Affairs at the Center for Latin American Studies, University of Pittsburgh. Readers/users of this work are encouraged to send corrections and suggestions concerning this volume to her: Shirley A. Kregar, Center for Latin American Studies, 4E32 Wesley W. Posvar Hall, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; or contact her via e- mail at [email protected]. Jorge Nallim is a doctoral student in the Department of History and a recipient of the Graduate Certificate in Latin American Studies, University of Pittsburgh. Jorge completed the onerous, monumental task of checking every and all addresses in this volume. He suggested the reorganization of sections and added greatly to the usefulness of this "workbook" by providing web sites. Jorge completed this research as a special student assistant in the summer of 2000. Without his efforts, you would not have this book in hand. SPECIAL THANKS TO: Those of you who took the time and trouble to advise me of corrections to be made and ideas for revision of this issue. Also many thanks to those of you who have let me know that this is a useful tool and service.
    [Show full text]
  • THIS IS the BEGINNIN UF Tjr
    FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WAmSUcTO". OC 20,413 THIS ISTHE BEGINNIN UF tJR # IDTE FILMED CAERA NO. *~~ ND DELIVERED May 13, 1988 FEDERL EXPRESS Lawrence M. Noble, Esq. General Counsel Federal Elections commission - 999 E Street, NW* ~ Washington, D.C. 20463 Re: Complaint for Possible Federal Violations by Friends of Dan--Boatwig=h Committee- Dear Mr. Noble: Please consider this a formal complaint for your consideration under Section 111.4 of Volume 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations. our full names and addresses as complainants are set forth at the end of this letter. We are supporters of Reverend Jesse Jackson's candidacy for president and are involved in his campaign to secure delegates in the California presidential primary, June 7, 1988. Senator Daniel E. Boatwright is a candidate for re-election and renomination in the upcoming primary of the same date. We are concerned that Senator Boatwright's activities designed to create the illusion of a "slate" of himself and the Reverend Jackson in connection with the primary election are violative of federal campaign spending limitations and thereby threaten to tarnish Reverend Jackson's California campaign. Let us state at the forefront that Reverend Jackson's formal campaign organization has disavowed Senator Boatwright's activities and we believe that the Jackson campaign is not in any way responsible for these "slate" activities. (See enclosed article from the Saturday, April 9, 1988 issue of the West Contra Costa Times.) In conformance with 11 CFR 111.4(d), we set forth the following: 1. The respondent appearing to have possibly committed violations of Federal campaign spending regulations is the Friends of Dan Boatwright Committee, Michael A.
    [Show full text]
  • No Majority Protest
    Greater Rincon Hill Community Benefits District Votes Received Report As of 7/28/2015 Properties Entitled to Vote Parcels: 3278 RETURNED BALLOTS VOTING FOR: 75.07% (Weighted Vote) RETURNED BALLOTS VOTING AGAINST: 24.93% (Weighted Vote) No Majority Protest Property Information % Parcel ASSESS ANNUAL Not APN PROPERTY LOCN PROPERTY OWNER Yes No Count MENT ASSESSMENT Voted 68 3709-019 50 FREMONT ST SALESFORCE 3.58% $87,016.94 $87,016.94 2116 3749-062 KILROY REALTY 303 LLC 3.49% $84,621.76 $84,621.76 713 3741-035 GAP INC 2.54% $61,599.50 $61,599.50 1441 3746-002 BAY AREA HEADQUARTERS AUTH 1.84% $44,704.34 $44,704.34 530 3721-001 KILROY REALTY LP 1.71% $41,518.16 $41,518.16 71 3710-017 350 MISSION ST KILROY REALTY 350 MISSION LLC 1.67% $40,590.74 $40,590.74 709 3740-033 CIM Group 1.60% $38,881.41 $38,881.41 2114 3749-059 Crescent Heights 1.57% $38,158.99 $38,158.99 94 3717-022 123 MISSION ST Pacific Eagle Holdings LLC 1.52% $36,911.28 $36,911.28 710 3740-034 221 MAIN PROPERTY OWNER LLC 1.46% $35,488.59 $35,488.59 2361 3765-022 401 HARRISON INVESTOR LLC 1.38% $33,420.28 $33,420.28 684 3736-183 TISHMAN SPEYER 1.29% $31,297.31 $31,297.31 87 3717-010 160 SPEAR ST LEGACY PARTNERS II SF SPEAR, L 1.27% $30,888.95 $30,888.95 3000 3766-262 Emerald Fund, Inc 1.14% $27,756.71 $27,756.71 91 3717-019 120 HOWARD ST 188 SPEAR STREET LLC 0.91% $21,976.17 $21,976.17 3278 3769-002A GPS CORPORATION FACILITIES IN 0.70% $17,057.43 $17,057.43 11 3708-055 50 1ST ST Oceanwide Center LLC 0.56% $13,611.68 $13,611.68 702 3739-008 BLOCKS 2, 3, 4, C/O CITY PROPERT 0.56%
    [Show full text]
  • No Majority Protest
    Downtown Community Benefit District Votes Received Report As of 7/16/2019 Properties Entitled to Vote Parcels: 669 RETURNED BALLOTS VOTING FOR: 70.51% (Weighted Vote) RETURNED BALLOTS VOTING AGAINST: 29.49% (Weighted Vote) No Majority Protest Property Information % Parcel ASSESS ANNUAL Not APN PROPERTY LOCN PROPERTY OWNER Yes No Count MENT ASSESSMENT Voted 482 3713 007 1 MARKET PLAZA PARAMOUNT ONE MARKET PLAZA 3.96% $153,431.20 $153,431.20 356 0259 026 555 CALIFORNIA ST HWA 555 OWNERS LLC C/O Danielle 3.80% $147,192.90 $147,192.90 201 0263 011 101 CALIFORNIA ST ELM PROPERTY VENTURE LLC/Hin 3.36% $130,000.00 $130,000.00 245 3710 019 45 FREMONT ST FORTY FIVE FREMONT ASSOCIATE 1.79% $69,200.00 $69,200.00 568 0269 001 235 MONTGOMERY ST RUSS BUILDING VENTURE LLC C/O 1.69% $65,324.50 $65,324.50 429 0266 009 1 FRONT ST MARKET FRONT ASSOCIATES LTD 1.56% $60,545.90 $60,545.90 637 0207 032 600 MONTGOMERY ST Transamerica Pyramid Properties, LLC C 1.35% $52,300.00 $52,300.00 26 0288 033 333 BUSH ST 333 BUSH LLC C/O Glenn Good 1.34% $51,923.50 $51,923.50 69 3708 043 595 MARKET ST 595 MARKET STREET INC C/O LILY 1.23% $47,618.90 $47,618.90 70 3708 059 595 MARKET ST 595 MARKET STREET INC C/O LILY 1.23% $47,618.90 $47,618.90 410 3709 012 455 MARKET ST LEGACY 455 MARKET STREET LP C 1.19% $45,969.60 $45,969.60 401 3713 006 1 MARKET ST LANDMARK FIREHILL HLDGS LLC/ 0.99% $38,154.30 $38,154.30 469 0290 011 1 BUSH ST ONE BUSH INC/Tishman Speyer C/O 0.82% $31,923.40 $31,923.40 589 0289 009 180 MONTGOMERY ST Sidra Montgomery, LLC C/O Kristie Are 0.78% $30,325.00
    [Show full text]
  • 302061723.Pdf
    HinkinsREA analyzes market data obtained from third party sources and the accuracy thereof has not been independently verified. References and quotes are taken from online sources, San Francisco Business Times, CoStar, LoopNet, Company websites & Press Releases, and other third party sources. Reproduction of this report prohibited. Copyright HinkinsREA. September 2013. 2012, A year which exceeded expectations. Leasing Market Recap 50% of the 61 largest blocks of space where Historic Sales Volume absorbed towards the end of 2012 including 2007 - $8.5 billion traded hands making it the 305,000 square foot at 500 Terry Street Francois highest sales volume year in the history of San Blvd where Maraki leased 110,000 SF; 264,000 SF Francisco. at 360 Third Street where Square Trade took 55,000 SF and two other tenants took 125,000 2012 – Sale Volume & Investor Demand SF; 1155 Market Street where the City of San Building sales blasted towards $6.1 billion due to Francisco took 110,000 SF; 760 Market Street foreign investors and pension funds activity where Obvious took 75,000 SF and 101 Spear marking the second time in history that the sales Street where Salesforce took 100,000 SF. volume topped $6.0 billion. The opportunistic The year-end decision by Salesforce to prelease buyers of 2010 and 2011 were replaced by the entire 444,000 square foot tower planned for institutional investors looking for stable, income 350 Mission Street (developer, Kilroy Realty Corp) producing properties, seeking well-leased core spurred the stage for fast-growing tenants to assets. The real estate cycle moved from buying begin grabbing space early in other large leased buildings to rehabs to ground up downtown buildings coming out of the ground in development.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Ethics Commission 2018 Lobbyist with Clients Ordered by Lobbyist Name Printed on Aug 5, 2019 Key for Compensation Amount Codes
    Texas Ethics Commission 2018 Lobbyist With Clients Ordered By Lobbyist Name Printed On Aug 5, 2019 Key for Compensation Amount Codes 70358 #1 Abbott, Sean (Mr.) Attorney 1108 Lavaca Street Suite 510 Austin TX (512)5182425 REGULAR Allen Boone Humphries Robinson LLP 3200 Southwest Freeway Suite 2600 Houston TX 77027 LT10000 PROSPECT 01/10/2018 to12/31/2018 Brazoria County Municipal Utility District No. 26 3200 Southwest Freeway Suite 2600 Houston TX 77027 LT10000 PROSPECT 04/27/2018 to12/31/2018 Brazoria-Fort Bend County Municipal Utility 3200 Southwest Freeway Suite 2600 Houston TX 77027 LT10000 PROSPECT 04/27/2018 to12/31/2018 District No. 1 Harris County Improvement District No. 1 1980 Post Oak Suite 1700 Houston TX 77056 LT10000 PROSPECT 01/10/2018 to12/31/2018 Harris County Improvement District No. 18 3200 Southwest Freeway Suite 2600 Houston TX 77027 LT10000 PROSPECT 10/26/2018 to12/31/2018 52844 #2 Abel, Douglas Deane (Mr.) healthcare 1515 Hermann Dr. Houston TX (713)5244267 MODIFIED Harris County Medical Society 1515 Hermann Dr. Houston TX 77004- LT10000 PROSPECT 01/09/2018 to12/31/2018 7126 10044 Director, Government 1001 Congress Avenue, Suite #3 Acevedo, Adrian G. (Mr.) Austin TX (512)4998085 REGULAR Relations/Attorney 400 Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1201 Lake Robbins Drive The Woodlands TX 77380 LT149999 PROSPECT 01/01/2018 to12/31/2018 53651 #4 Acevedo, Julianne (Ms.) 1122 Colorado Suite 106 Austin TX (512)9710775 MODIFIED Beacon Health Options 912 So. Capitol of Texas Hwy. Suite 350 Austin TX 78746 LT10000 PROSPECT 01/18/2018 to08/20/2018 Capitol Anesthesiology Association 3705 Medical Parkway # 570 Austin TX 78705 LT10000 PROSPECT 01/18/2018 to12/31/2018 Aug 5, 2019 Page 1 of 373 City of Baytown 2401 Market St.- Baytown TX 77522 LT10000 PROSPECT 01/18/2018 to12/31/2018 City of Round Rock 221 E.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Office Market Cools Down
    Research & Forecast Report SAN FRANCISCO | OFFICE MARKET Q1 | 2020 San Francisco Office > VACANCY San Francisco’s vacancy rate rose 80 basis points to 5.3 percent Market Cools Down which translated to nearly 749,000 square feet of negative net absorption. The South Financial District experienced nearly 267,000 square feet of negative net absorption. This is primarily due to Blue Shield vacating nearly 263,000 square feet at 50 Beale Street. Additionally, the Yerba Buena submarket posted nearly 318,000 square feet of negative net absorption due to Ellation vacating 110,000 square feet at 835 Market Street and Nektar vacating over 67,000 square feet at RFR Realty purchased 360 Third Street. 301 Battery Street for $143 million, ($769 psf) > LEASING VOLUME San Francisco’s leasing volume declined during the first quarter of the year, with nearly 840,000 square feet of closed transactions. This is well below the 20-year quarterly average of over 1.8 million square feet and marks the first time in the past few years that San Francisco has not had a 100,000 square foot deal close. The largest lease signed during the first quarter of the year was Knotel's sublease of nearly 84,000 square feet at 301 Brannan COLUMBUS Street. Despite this wane in leasing volume during the first quarter of 2020, technology companies continue to lead the charge for space in San Francisco. Skillz subleased for Technology tenants account for 46.3 percent of the demand in the City which nearly 52,000 square translates into nearly 4.1 million square feet of requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Forecast
    San Francisco Bay Area Commercial Real Estate 2015 Forecast Your comprehensive guide to trends impacting the commercial real estate market. We are pleased to share with you our San Francisco Bay Area Commercial Real Estate 2015 Forecast. This report is an annual review and forecast that summarizes the trends impacting commercial real estate in each of the major Bay Area markets. This guide offers forward-looking analysis in addition to summaries of recent activity for office, R&D, industrial, retail, investment and multi-family real estate throughout the Bay Area. We examine both leasing and investment trends as well as the underlying economic fundamentals that drive our marketplace. This report represents only a fraction of our research capabilities. Working in unison with our brokerage staff, DTZ research maintains the region’s largest database of properties, tenants, landlords, buyers, sellers, availabilities, and deal comparables of all types. Our research department publishes detailed quarterly snapshots and reports covering all of our markets and we provide custom analytics for our clients. Contact your DTZ broker to get on our research mailing list to regularly receive research publication notifications. Table of Contents Message from DTZ 5 Company Overview 6 Economic Outlook 10 Commercial Real Estate Outlook 20 Infographics 48 Top Lease Transactions by Market 50 Credits and Terms 55 Challenging the Conventional 4 www.dtz.com DTZ 2015 FORECAST To Our Valued Clients, Heading into 2014 we were confident that it would be a Make no mistake about it. You will still be dealing with the strong year for the Bay Area’s economy, for commercial real same people and the same dedication to excellence that estate in the region and for our firm.
    [Show full text]