137 Oberon Street PO Box 84 Oberon NSW 2787
Telephone: (02) 6329 8100 Fax: (02) 6329 8142 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]
AGENDA AND BUSINESS PAPERS
Oberon Council Ordinary Meeting Tuesday 20 February 2018
Commencing at 5.30pm at the Oberon Council Chambers
1 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
2 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Agenda Items page
1. OPENING OF MEETING ...... 5 2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY ...... 5 3. PRAYER ...... 5 4. RECORD OF ATTENDANCE ...... 5 5. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST ...... 6 6. PRESENTATIONS ...... 7 7. QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC ...... 7 8. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES ...... 7 9. MAYORAL MINUTE AND REPORT ...... 8 09.01 MAYORAL MINUTE AND REPORT ...... 8 10. NOTICES OF MOTIONS ...... 11 10.01 NOTICE OF MOTION – OBERON EAST SEWERAGE ...... 11 10.02 NOTICE OF MOTION – PURCHASE OF A TIPPING TRAILER ...... 11 11. COUNCILLOR AND DELEGATES REPORTS ...... 12 11.01 UPPER MACQUARIE COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING – 2 FEBRUARY 2018 ...... 12 12. COMMITTEE REPORTS ...... 18 12.01 LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE ...... 18 12.02 OBERON SPORTS FACILITIES COMMITTEE ...... 22 12.03 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE ...... 26 13. REPORTS FOR DECISION ...... 30 13.01 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 10.2017.1006.1 – TWO STOREY DWELLING...... 30 13.02 PLANNING PROPOSAL – 2519 O’CONNELL ROAD ...... 56 13.03 JOINT ORGANISATIONS – OBERON COUNCIL INVOLVEMENT ...... 60 13.04 REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE – OBERON TIGERS CHANGE ROOMS ...... 65 13.05 REQUESTS FOR ASSISTANCE - SENIORS WEEK, INTERNATIONAL WOMENS DAY & OTHR ...... 73 13.06 PROPOSAL - BEN CHIFLEY CATCHMENT STEERING COMMITTEE ...... 77 13.07 DOG ROCKS ROAD – COMPULSORY ACQUSITION OF FORESTRY CORPORATION NSW LAND...... 81 13.08 BAILEYS LANE – POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ...... 108 13.09 OBERON RUGBY LEAGUES CLUB – WATER MAIN RENEWAL ...... 114 13.10 PROPOSED CROWN ROAD CLOSURES ...... 118 13.11 OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT DRAFT MODEL CODE OF MEETING PRACTICE FOR LOCAL COUNCILS IN NSW ...... 120 13.12 PROPOSED COUNCILLOR INDUCTION AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES ...... 122 13.13 QUARTERLY BUDGET REVIEW STATEMENT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2017 ... 124 14. REPORTS FOR INFORMATION ...... 131 14.01 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT – GENERAL MANAGER ...... 131 14.02 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT – PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPT...... 137 14.03 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT – TECHNICAL SERVICES ...... 145 14.04 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT – FINANCE & COMMUNITY SERVICES ...... 150 14.05 STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS ...... 157
3 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
14.06 GRANTS MONTHLY UPDATE ...... 160 14.07 WATER AND SEWER PLANT REPORT ...... 164 15. URGENT BUSINESS ...... 176 16. CLOSED SESSION / CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS ...... 176 16.01 LAND PURCHASE CORNER ABERCROMBIE & CAMPELLS RIVER ROAD BLACK SPRINGS ...... 177 16.02 PROPERTY & LAND DEVELOPMENT – INDUSTRIAL ESTATE ...... 177 17. CLOSURE OF MEETING ...... 177
4 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
1. OPENING OF MEETING The Mayor will welcome members and declare the meeting open.
2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY Council acknowledges that this meeting is being held on the traditional lands of the Wiradjuri and Gundungurra People, and respects the history and culture of the elders both past and present.
3. PRAYER The Meeting will be opened in prayer.
4. RECORD OF ATTENDANCE Members Mayor Kathy Sajowitz (in the Chair) Deputy Mayor Kerry Gibbons Clr Don Capel Clr Ian Doney Clr Mark Kellam Clr Brenda Lyon Clr Clive McCarthy Clr Mick McKechnie Clr Andrew McKibbin
Staff Gary Wallace, General Manager Shane Wilson, Planning and Development Director Lynette Safranek, Finance and Community Services Director Chris Schumacher, Technical Services Director Sharon Swannell, Executive Coordinator
Apologies Nil
5 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
5. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST File No: Governance/Councillors/Declarations of Interest
A GUIDE TO ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING (Provided by the Independent Commission Against Corruption)
Is the decision or conduct legal? Is it consistent with Government policy, Council’s objectives and code of conduct? What will the outcome be for you, your colleagues, the Council, anyone else? Does it raise a conflict of interest? Do you stand to gain personally at public expense? Can the decision be justified in terms of public interest? Would it withstand public scrutiny?
A conflict of interest is a clash between private interest and public duty. There are two types of conflict:
Pecuniary – regulated by the Local Government Act and Department of Local Government Non-pecuniary – regulated by codes of conduct and policy. ICAC, Ombudsman, Department of Local Government (advice only)
The test for conflict of interest:
Is it likely I could be influenced by personal interest in carrying out my public duty? Would a fair and reasonable person believe I could be so influenced? Conflict of interest is closely tied to the layperson’s definition of “corruption” – using public office for private gain Important to consider public perceptions of whether you have a conflict of interest
Identifying problems
1st Do I have private interests affected by a matter I am officially involved in? 2nd Is my official role one of influence or perceived influence over the matter? 3rd Do my private interests conflict with my official role?
Whilst seeking advice is generally useful, the ultimate decision rests with the person concerned.
When making a Declaration of Interest the reason for making the declaration should be clearly stated. Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Significant Interests should be managed by leaving the room while the matter is considered.
Pecuniary - Non-Pecuniary - Significant Non-Pecuniary - Less than Significant
6 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
6. PRESENTATIONS Nil
7. QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC The community is to be given the opportunity to ask questions at the commencement of the council meeting, and the Mayor is to ask for questions from the gallery prior to the commencement of the ordinary meeting.
Members of the public wishing to address Council are permitted to do so provided the following guidelines are adhered to.
1. The person asking the question at the Council meeting must clearly state their name and in what capacity they are acting. 2. If the person asking the questions is acting as another person/organisation’s agent they must advise Council if they have their prior consent/authority.
Questions from the public is not an opportunity for debate with elected representatives or staff, there are other forums to facilitate this; it is an opportunity for the community to ask a question in relation to an issue or put a point of view relating to an issue that may be causing interest or concern. Due to time constraints a time frame of three minutes per speaker is allocated. All questions and comments must be directed through the Mayor and in the instance of a question, if it cannot be answered it will be taken on notice and a response given within a reasonable period of time. This is the only opportunity for a community member to address Council during an Ordinary Meeting.
None received.
8. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES Works Committee Meeting 12 December 2017 ATTACHED is the Minutes of the Works Committee Meeting held on 12 December 2017.
Recommendation:
That the Minutes of the Works Committee Meeting held on 12 December 2017 be confirmed.
Matters Arising from the Minutes
Nil
Ordinary Meeting 19 December 2017 ATTACHED is the Minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 19 December 2017.
Recommendation:
That the Minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 19 December 2017 be confirmed.
Matters Arising from the Minutes
Nil
7 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
9. MAYORAL MINUTE AND REPORT
09.01 MAYORAL MINUTE AND REPORT File No: Governance/Meetings/Ordinary Author: Clr Kathy Sajowitz, Mayor
Summary This report summaries the main activity for the Mayor since my last report.
Recommendation
That Report Item 09.01 is received as information.
Comment
A. Meetings 13 Dec Oberon Business and Tourism Association Meeting and Christmas Function (attended by Clr Gibbons) 19 Dec Ordinary Council Meeting 9 Jan Meet with the Hon Paul Toole MP and Oberon RSL Bowing Club – grant announcement 10 Jan Meet with the Hon Paul Toole MP and O’Connell Rural Fire Service – inspection of new shed facilities 16 Jan Meeting with Veronika Cvitanovic, Chris Freeman, Janet Poole and Phillip Haynes regarding fluoridation 16 Jan Wellness Expo Planning Meeting 16 Jan Australia Day Working Party Meeting 16 Jan Meeting with Oberon MPS personnel re Fluoride 18 Jan Oberon Street businesses re Australia Day Shop Window Competition 23 Jan Inspection of Planning Proposal – O’Connell 24 Jan Australia Day Working Party – set up for Australia Day Ceremony 25 Jan Australia Day Working Party – set up at McKeowns Rest for Australia Day Ambassador meet and greet function 5 Feb Oberon Correctional Centre re MOU Scope of Works 6 Feb Wellness Expo Planning Meeting 6 Feb Helen Lowe, Oberon Business and Tourism Association 7 Feb Centroc Tourism Managers Meeting, Orange 7 Feb Rural Doctors Network Presentation 9 Feb Marjorie Armstrong and Keith Sullivan 12 Feb Meet with Rhonda Taylor, General Manager Destination Networks County and Outback NSW re tourism initiatives in Oberon 13 Feb Bishop Ian Palmer and Karen Trafford re St Aiden’s Church, Black Springs 13 Feb Tim Ward re Industrial Land 13 Feb Rates Workshop and Councillor Informal Briefing Session
8 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
B. Representation 13 Dec Welcome to Oberon Function (attended by Clr Gibbons) 14 Dec Oberon Correctional Centre Gurnang Life Challenge Graduation Ceremony 15 Dec St Josephs Catholic School end of year assembly 16 Dec Oberon Tarana Heritage Rail Christmas Function 16 Dec Borg Panels Christmas Function 17 Dec Oberon RSL Sub-Branch Christmas Function 17 Jan Assist with School Holiday Activities at Oberon Library 19 Jan Bathurst Harness Racing Oberon Community Race Evening 20 Jan Oberon Youth Council Movie Day 23 Jan Summer Reading Program Prize Presentation at the Oberon Library 25 Jan Australia Day Ambassador Welcome Function with Australia Day award nominees 26 Jan Oberon Australia Day Official Ceremony and Citizenship Ceremony 10 Feb Oberon Show 12 Feb Lunch with Hamish Keith, Mayfield Garden and Rhonda Taylor, Destination Networks Country and Outback NSW 13 Feb Friends of the Oberon Library Meeting
C. Correspondence 7 Dec Melbourne School of Government providing information about the McKinnon Prize in Political Leadership. 14 Dec Australian Local Government Association providing an update of the Associations plans for 2018. 15 Dec Charlie and Kevin Wakeham outlining their objections to the East Oberon Sewerage Project. 15 Dec John Hebblewhite re Skoda and Tatra Museum. 15 Dec Cr Linda Scott, President Local Government NSW regarding the release of the interactive version of the Local Government Capability Framework. 18 Dec Geoffrey Brown OAM, First Assistant Secretary, PFAS Taskforce providing information about per and poly fluoroalkyl substances. 18 Dec The Hon Melinda Pavey MP, Minister for Roads, Maritime and Freight advising that the Meadows and Hazelgrove Road Upgrade Project has been successful for funding from the Restart NSW fund. 18 Dec LDC Infrastructure outlining the key trends in the telco industry in 2017. 19 Dec Fulan Dafa Association of Australia Inc. regarding the Shen Yun Performing Arts 2018 performances in Sydney. 21 Dec Blue Mountains City Council Mayor, Cr Mark Greenhill, providing a copy of the Council’s response to the Minister for Local Government’s notice of intent to suspend the elected Council for a period of 3 months, and appoint an interim administrator. 21 Dec Correspondence forwarded to the Right Reverend Ian Palmer, Bishop of Bathurst re the proposed closure and sale of St Aiden’s Church, Black Springs. 22 Dec Dr Sarah Raphael, Policy and Advocacy Advisor with the Australian Dental Association NSW offer to speak to Oberon Councillors regarding fluoridation. 4 Jan The Right Reverend Ian Palmer, Bishop of Bathurst response to correspondence. 7 Jan Barry Stubbs regarding the increase in rates since 2012. 12 Jan Sam Harris regarding a new portrait of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II for the Council Chambers.
9 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
16 Jan Correspondence forwarded to member Councils on the Local Government NSW Unrateable Forestry Land working party regarding further meeting to progress the motion passed at the LGNSW Annual Conference. 17 Jan Correspondence forwarded to Ms Priscilla Stanley, Acting Manager, Health Protection, Western NSW and Far West Public Health Unit seeking presentation to Oberon Councillors regarding fluoridation. 18 Jan Correspondence forwarded to the Right Reverend Ian Palmer responding to correspondence received on 4 January 2018. 18 Jan Correspondence forwarded to the Most Reverend Phillip Freier, Archbishop of Melbourne, Primate of the Anglican Church of Australia regarding the proposed closure and sale of St Aiden’s Church Black Springs. 19 Jan Vanessa Burrow, Active Living NSW invitation to attend the Active Living NSW FitNSW 2018 being held on Thursday 15 March 2018 at the Aerial UTS Function Centre, Ultimo. 19 Jan Richard Morris, Bankstown NSW lobbying for Riding on Footpaths to be legalised. 19 Jan Stakeholder Engagement and Citizenship Ceremonies Team providing supporting information for Citizenship Ceremonies. 25 Jan Ken Hutton, Executive Officer to the Archbishop of Melbourne, Anglican Church of Australia advising that the matter of the closure and sale of St Aiden’s Church Black Springs rests with the Standing Committee of the Diocese. 25 Jan Chairman of the Australia Day Council of New South Wales providing the Council’s statement of intent Toward Reconciliation. 29 Jan Oberon Anti-Amalgamation Committee conveying thanks to Oberon Council for the Special Award presented at the 2018 Australia Day celebrations. 29 Jan Andrew Gee MP, Federal Member for Calare advising that applications are now open for Round 6 of the Australian Governments Heavy Vehicle Safety and Productivity Program. 29 Jan Veronika Cvitanovic providing contact details for suitably qualified people to present to Councillors against fluoridation. 30 Jan Jim Snelson, Borg Panels regarding success of Oberon’s Australia Day celebrations. 6 Feb Roger Arrow enquiring about Councils position on the extension of Baileys Lane. 7 Feb Correspondence forwarded to Marianne Saliba, Australian Local Government Women’s Association seeking clarification regarding voting at the 2018 ALGWA Annual Conference. 8 Feb Correspondence forwarded to Sue Fisher-Smith, Oberon Neighbourhood Centre providing information about a presentation from the Rural Doctors Network held on 7 February. 8 Feb Correspondence forwarded to Dave Karlson, Rural Doctors Network and Andrew Harvey, PHN thanking them for presentation to the Oberon Medical community and confirming a “needs assessment” will be done for the Oberon area in the near future. 8 Feb Correspondence forwarded to Oberon Medical Centre, Oberon MPS and Oberon Health Council thanking for attendance at Rural Doctors Network presentation and following up on future actions. 8 Feb Joan Howell regarding the proposed sale of St. Aiden’s Anglican Church at Black Springs, and providing some corrected information about the history of the facility, a response has been provided to Ms Howell. 12 Feb Invitation to attend the Oberon Arts Council Night with Harrie Fasher at the Long Arm Farm Café on Tuesday 21 February 2018. 12 Feb Wayne and Bernice Keft providing objection to the proposed East Oberon Sewerage project. Jan/Feb Letters from Veronika Cvitanovic, Alwyn and Sue Louger, the Freeman Commercial and Private Inquiry Agency PL and Geoff Pain PhD outlining their opposition to fluoridation.
10 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
10. NOTICES OF MOTIONS 10.01 NOTICE OF MOTION – OBERON COMMON CARPARK File No: Parks and Reserves/Service Provision/Oberon Common Author: Clr Clive McCarthy
Summary Seeking to seal the new carpark at the Oberon Common.
Motion
That Oberon Council look to reserves to fund hot mix seal of the new car park at the Oberon Common.
10.02 NOTICE OF MOTION – PURCHASE OF A TIPPING TRAILER File No: Plant and Equipment/Acquisition/Purchase Author: Clr Clive McCarthy
Summary Seeking to purchase a tipping trailer to utilise the use of the low loader prime mover more often.
Motion
That Oberon Council look at the purchase of a tipping trailer (two wheel axle) to utilize the use of the low loader prime mover more often.
11 | Page Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
11. COUNCILLOR AND DELEGATES REPORTS
11.01 UPPER MACQUARIE COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING – 2 FEBRUARY 2018 File No: Environmental Management/Meetings/Upper Macquarie County Council Author: Clr Andrew McKibbin
Summary
The most recent meeting of the Upper Macquarie County Council was held on Friday 2 February 2018 at the Council Offices in Kelso. The meeting was attended by Council’s delegates Clr Andrew McKibbin and Clr Don Capel.
Recommendation:
1. That report item 11.01 is received as information. 2. Council General Manager and Mayor (or the Mayors delegate) attend the Meeting on 16 March 2018 together with Oberon Council UMCC delegates.
A copy of correspondence from Bathurst Regional Council to UMCC dated 14 December 2017 regarding UMCC continuation FOLLOWS for Council’s information.
The Meeting commenced 2.30pm. The following commentary is provided: a. UMCC Future
The Chairman confirmed letters had been received from all Councils except Lithgow in relation to the future. Lithgow delegates advised a letter of support would be forthcoming.
The formal response from Bathurst Regional Council requesting a meeting of Mayors and General Managers with the UMCC Board to consider future arrangements including issues raised in a letter of February 2014.
It was determined that prior to the next UMCC meeting on Friday 16 March 2018 that a meeting will be held with the Mayors and General Managers of the constituent councils with the councillors of UMCC in relation to the governance model issue and issues raised by Bathurst Regional Council in its letter dated 14 December 2017. b. Finances
As foreshadowed at the previous meeting due to increased administration costs under the Biosecurity Act UMCC was awarded a further $92,716 under the Weeds Action Program funding which addressed its projected loss for 2017-18. c. Chief Weeds Officer Report
A total of 254 Inspections occurred between 11 November 17 and 19 January 2018 but only 12 in Oberon due to the resignation of the Weeds Officer. No Bio Security Directions were issued in this period due to Christmas and the New Year period. In the previous period 10 Bio Security Directions were issued and the time period for compliance has expired. Show cause letters have been issued to 4 landholders representing 8 properties. If Landholders fail to respond then fines will be issued.
12 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Discussion occurred on the adequacy of the current two registers: One for Inspections; and The other for Bio security Direction registers.
It was proposed a single register should be utilised to track properties from the date when an unsatisfactory inspection occurs right through to issue of fines/prosecutions. This was to ensure that there is a record of the total process leading to Biosecurity Directions and subsequent fines / court proceedings.
Similarly a process diagram should be devised to explain the processes and timeframe for each process.
The Acting General Manager and Chief Weeds Officer are to consider both of these suggestions. d. General Manager Position
The Acting General Manager, Roger Bailey, advised the meeting he had accepted the position of General Manager at Warrumbungle’s Council and would be departing on 25 February 2018. The Chairman requested the General Manager’s Recruitment and Performance Review Committee consisting of the Chairman, Ian North, the Deputy Chairman, David Kingham, and Councillor Stephen Leslie should remain behind after the Meeting to consider an Interim solution to the departure of the Acting General Manager. It was noted not all Constituent Councils were represented on the Recruitment and Performance Review Committee with Oberon having no delegate on the Committee. Oberon delegates stated they thought it appropriate Oberon should be represented on the Committee. The Oberon delegates appointed Andrew McKibbin as the Oberon representative on the Committee
In relation to the appointment of a permanent General Manager Advertisements have been published and applications close on Wednesday 14 February 2018. The General Manager’s Recruitment and Performance Review Committee will:
a) make a recommendation to Council on the appointment of a preferred candidate; b) determine the period of the contract of employment; remuneration; and hours of work for the position e. Weeds Officer Positions
Offers were made to two of the applicants for these positions, unfortunately both have declined. New advertisements are to be placed f. Landholder Advisory Committee
It was proposed a Landholder Advisory Committee be established by Bruce Reynolds a Blayney Delegate. The Committee would have landholder representation though NSW farmers and other stakeholders including Forestry Corporation. The terms of reference for this committee will be developed by the Upper Macquarie County Council but are to focus on weed infestation reporting, landholder engagement, education and weed priority issues. The advisory committee would meet quarterly.
The UMCC determined that the concept was acceptable but the terms of reference and purpose of the advisory committee needed to be more clearly defined.
13 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
g. General Manager’s Recruitment and Performance Review Committee
This Committee met following the closure of the UMCC meeting. The Acting General Manager proposed that existing UMCC employee Lisa Monardo be considered to take over from him pending the appointment of a permanent General Manager. The Committee interviewed Lisa Monardo. The interview was handled very well and the Committee took cognisance of Lisa’s role with the Police Force and at UMCC as an Administrative Assistant undertaking many of the administration roles with the Acting General Manager.
The Acting General Manager advised that Lisa has qualities and skills that would be required for the role. She had shown an aptitude to learn her roles and expand her knowledge of the organisation so that she had developed an extensive knowledge of the organisation, from undertaking inspection, spraying and community engagement duties to managing the finances and administrative duties. It was also noted that Lisa had a very good relationship with the other employees of UMCC and was often called upon to provide advice and assistance. Lisa challenged decisions and approaches in a manner that is respectful that ultimately results in a better outcome for the organisation.
The Acting General Manager believed that with Lisa’s skills, approach and commitment to her role along with being provided with the support from the General Managers of the constituent councils that she had the ability to fulfil the role.
It was agreed the position be offered to Lisa on the basis of the existing remuneration for the General Manager’s position however that it be based on a 35 hour week not a 20 hour week
Notes:
14 | P a g e
Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
12. COMMITTEE REPORTS 12.01 LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE File: Governance/Meetings/Local Emergency Management Committee Author: Chris Schumacher, Technical Services Director
Summary Minutes of the Local Emergency Management Committee Meeting held on 13 November 2017 are submitted for Council’s information and consideration.
Recommendation:
That the Minutes of the Local Emergency Management Committee Meeting held on 13 November 2017 are received as information.
Comment
FOLLOWING are the Minutes of the Local Emergency Management Committee Meeting held on 13 November 2017.
A summary of the Committee discussions and outcomes is listed below:
Oberon Police station is still experiencing staffing difficulties with staff from other stations assisting. SES raised issues with vermin at the RFS headquarters at Burraga. SES will make representations to the State Member seeking to use the recently closed Burraga School as headquarters. RFS are concerned about the outlook for the upcoming warmer months due to little rainfall and dryness. Fire and rescue NSW have recently run a School Fire education program in the area.
The next meeting of the Committee will be held on 12 February 2018, commencing at 2.00pm.
Notes:
18 | P a g e
OBERON LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Page 1 of 3
The Meeting was held on Monday 13 November 2017 in the SES Building, off North Street and Albion Street Oberon. The Meeting commenced at 2.03 pm
ATTENDANCE Name Organisation Chris Schumacher Oberon Council – Works and Engineering Director Aaron Evans Woodchem David Ward Borg Panels Mick Holland New South Wales Rural Fire Service Kim de Govrik New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service Craig Ronan New South Wales State Emergency Service Janine Sharp New South Wales State Emergency Service Keven Verhoeven Fire and Rescue New South Wales Steven Evans Fire and Rescue New South Wales Brett Jackson Fire and Rescue New South Wales David Abercrombie New South Wales Police Force - LEOCON Craig Bowra New South Wales Police Force - REMO Rebecca Burgess Oberon Council – Works and Engineering Administration Annette Schneider left meeting Ambulance Service New South Wales 2.05pm
1. APOLOGIES Gary Wallace Oberon Council – General Manager Ashley Slattery Essential Energy Michael Weekes Essential Energy Brett Jackson Fire and Rescue New South Wales Craig Gibbons New South Wales State Emergency Service Andrew Sterling Corrective Services New South Wales Christine Symington Oberon Health Service John Kanne Ambulance Service New South Wales Greg Sim New South Wales Rural Fire Service
2. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES Local Emergency Management Committee meeting held 14 August 2017 It was noted that Keven Verhoeven’s name was incorrectly spelt in the minutes.
Committee Vote: Unanimous Support
That the Minutes of the Local Emergency Management Committee meeting held 14 August 2017 be taken as read and confirmed.
3. MATTERS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING Nil
4. REMO REPORT TO CENTRAL WEST LEMC’S NOVEMBER 2017 Craig Bowra spoke to the report which was provided to the Committee at the time the Agenda for the meeting was distributed.
Minutes of the Oberon Local Emergency Management Committee Meeting held on 13 November 2017. Page 19 OBERON LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Page 2 of 3
Craig highlighted the Critical Infrastructure Resilience Strategy (CIRS) discussion paper for NSW to which organisations can make submissions. The training opportunities available in 2018 were also highlighted.
5. CMG for Biosecurity FOLLOWING Endorsed Local Emergency Management Plan for Oberon and all associated CMG’s.
Craig Bowra advised that the Local Emergency Management Plan for Oberon was endorsed at Regional level with the addition of a CMG for Biosecurity which was provided for inclusion in the Plan.
Craig supplied Oberon Council with a digital and hard copy of the endorsed Local Emergency Management Plan for Oberon and all associated CMG’s.
Annette Schneider left the meeting at 2.05pm
6. REPORTS FROM AGENCIES New South Wales Police Force – David Abercrombie reported that with ongoing staff issues at the Oberon Police station other areas such as Portland and Blayney are assisting to maintain staffing levels. An advertisement for Oberon staff has been placed however historically it has been difficult to fill. Andrew Harwood of Trunkey Creek is the Acting Sergeant for Oberon. David also advised that NSW Police are undergoing some restructures with more information to be known by May 2018. New South Wales State Emergency Service – Craig Ronan advised that SES have undertaken 3 rescues since the last LEMC meeting and quite a few Ambulance assists. Craig raised the issue of the condition of the Burraga SES headquarters. It is very dirty and vermin infested. As the Burraga School has recently been closed Craig advise he will approach the State Member request to use part thereof the old school building as SES headquarters. New South Wales Rural Fire Service - Mick Holland reported that the RFS is at full staffing levels. The new RFS Station at O’Connell is soon to become operational and RFS are awaiting delivery of a new tanker. RFS expressed concern that with little rain, the approaching warmer months has progressively worse outlook. Mick asked Craig Bowra for guidance on providing Bushfire Awareness Training for animal rescue agencies. Craig advised Mick to discuss this matter and seek guidance from Department of Primary Industries. New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service – Kim de Govrak reported that NPWS staff are trained up and prepared for the coming summer months. Soil dryness in National Parks is a concern and there have been a few small fires. Fire and Rescue New South Wales – Steven Evans reported that a School Fire Education program has been conducted in the area. The Oberon Station is recruiting for 1 position and has received several strong applications. Michaela Sherlock has been appointed Deputy Captain. Woodchem – Aaron Evans introduced David Ward who has been appointed as WHS Officer for Borg Panels.
Minutes of the Oberon Local Emergency Management Committee Meeting held on 13 November 2017. Page 20 OBERON LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Page 3 of 3
Oberon Council – Chris Schumacher advised that the angle parking in North St out the front of the Oberon Fire Station is progressing with signage installed. A preliminary inspection for handover is scheduled this week for the O’Connell Fire Shed with handover expected to be prior to the end of November 2017. A DA for the Mayfield Fire Shed has been lodged however it is currently held up with an Aboriginal Land Claim. Oberon Council has a new Skid Steer which will be added to the RFS Heavy Plant register.
5. GENERAL BUSINESS Nil
6. NEXT MEETING DATE AND MEETING CLOSE.
The next meeting will be held on 12 February 2018 at 2.00pm. Please note this date is amended from that which was listed on the Agenda.
The dates for next years meetings are: 14 May, 13 August and 12 November 2018 at 2.00pm.
The Meeting closed at 2.40 pm.
Minutes of the Oberon Local Emergency Management Committee Meeting held on 13 November 2017. Page 21 Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
12.02 OBERON SPORTS FACILITIES COMMITTEE File: Governance/Meetings/Oberon Sports Facilities Committee Author: Chris Schumacher, Technical Services Director
Summary Minutes of the Oberon Sports Facilities Committee held on 15 November 2017 are submitted for Council’s information.
Recommendation:
That the Minutes of the Oberon Sports Facilities Committee Meeting held on 15 November 2017 are received as information.
Comment FOLLOWING are the Minutes of the Oberon Sports Facilities Committee held on 15 November 2017.
A summary of the Committee discussions is listed below:
The OSFC discussed the uncertainty of maintenance expenses at the Oberon Leagues Grounds, given the possible sale of the Leagues Club to Borg. The OSFC discussed the grants available for clubs to economically obtain defibrillators. The Rugby Leagues Club discussed the necessity of dressing shed upgrades in order for the Club to be compliant with new League criteria. The Technical Services Director to discuss fertilisation of the small soccer field next to the RFS with the fertilisation company. The OSFC discussed the ongoing issues with lighting being left on at the Recreation Ground. Council’s Technical Services Director to investigate options with Spark Electrical.
The next meeting of the Committee will be held on Wednesday 21 February 2018, commencing at 4.30pm.
Notes:
22 | P a g e
OBERON COUNCIL – OBERON SPORTS FACILITIES COMMITTEE Page 1 of 3
The Meeting was held in the Council’s Committee Room, 137-139 Oberon Street, Oberon.
The Meeting commenced at 4.45 pm.
ATTENDANCE Clr Kerry Gibbons Oberon Council Member (chair) Chris Schumacher Works and Engineering Director Ian Christie-Johnston Oberon Tigers Rugby League Rebecca Burgess Works and Engineering Administration Clinton Corby Oberon United Football Club
APOLOGIES Gary Wallace General Manager Mayor, Clr Kathy Sajowitz Oberon Council Member Raeleine Eiler Oberon District Little Athletics Kristy Rusten Oberon District Little Athletics Bob Mills Oberon Heritage Collectors Club Michael Gibbons Oberon Indoor and Tennis Centre and Oberon Touch Football Club
1. ATTENDANCE and APOLOGIES
See Attendance List, above.
2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Nil
3. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
Oberon Sports Facilities Committee Meeting 16 August 2017
Committee Vote: Unanimous Support
That the Minutes of the Oberon Sports Facilities Committee Meeting held on 16 August 2017 be taken as read and confirmed.
4. MATTERS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING Ian Christie-Johnston raised the issue of the uneven back field/divots and asked if they can be filled and levelled out. Chris Schumacher replied that it has been estimated that $28,000 will be required to put water through so that the fields can be watered regularly, in addition to topsoiling and fertilisation costs. Council was hesitant to invest given the uncertainty around the sale of the Leagues Club to Borg.
There was discussion that the senior and junior league will be offered carnivals next year.
Minutes of the Oberon Sports Facilities Committee Meeting held on 15 November 2017
Page 23 OBERON COUNCIL – OBERON SPORTS FACILITIES COMMITTEE Page 2 of 3
5. REPORTS
1. LOCAL SPORT DEFIBRILATION GRANT PROGRAM Ian Christie-Johnston and Clinton Corby advised that both clubs have applied for defibrillators in the past and not been successful. This program is a partially funded grant and both clubs will apply.
2. WORKS AND ENGINEERING DIRECTORS ACTIONS UPDATE Chris Schumacher reported that Remote Signs as Supervision is progressing. Following inspections with the new WHS Officer David Lawson, clarification is being sought from Statecover. Following this Council will order the signage.
Ian Christie-Johnston asked about street directional signage for the fields and grounds and Chris Schumacher responded that funding would be required for this.
Chris raised the lighting at the Leagues Grounds and reiterated that this was also on hold given the uncertainty around the sale of the Leagues Club to Borg.
6. GENERAL BUSINESS
Oberon Tigers Rugby League , Ian Christie-Johnston – 1. Ian advised the Committee that at the recent Seniors League AGM new criteria was introduced with regards to playing surface, crowd control and participation of officials and players through the dressing sheds. This will impact Oberon League Clubs eligibility to host finals and will be addressed by the Club to ensure compliance prior to the next season. 2. The Oberon Leagues Club representatives and Council representatives recently met with John Borg and his team to discuss Borg’s purchase of the Leagues Club grounds and arrangements for a new facility. John Borg indicated that he would be prepared to put some money towards a new Leagues ground and it is proposed to relocate it to the Industrial buffer zone between Herborn St and Albion St, however this is pending a decision from Council regarding re-zoning. Council also are required to value the land of the Leagues Club so that discussions can progress. Ian believes that even with progression of the matter, it is a 3-5 year plan before the club is settled in a new location.
Oberon United Football Club , Clinton Corby – 1. Clinton queried why the small soccer field next to the RFS was not included in the recent fertilisation as it has tuffs of grass and could have used with some attention. Chris responded that soil tests had shown the field to be in a good condition. Chris to inspect and discuss with fertilisation company. It was noted by both Ian and Chris that following the fertilisation some large aggregate was found to have been deposited onto the fields. 2. Clinton reported that the Recreation Ground is going well, the mowing by Council’s Parks and Gardens crew is good and the fertilisation has worked well. 3. Clinton reminded the Committee that it would be good to have some amenities such as seats and shelters at the Recreation Ground for inclement weather. 4. Clinton reported that the soccer club has held its AGM and the season is shaping up to be a good one.
Minutes of the Oberon Sports Facilities Committee Meeting held on 15 November 2017
Page 24 OBERON COUNCIL – OBERON SPORTS FACILITIES COMMITTEE Page 3 of 3
Oberon Council, Chris Schumacher – 1. Chris reported that there are still issues with lighting being left on in the night-time at the Recreation Ground. Clinton advised that he believes this is due to the Skate Park, the kids switch the lights on so they can skate and then do not turn them back off. Chris has investigated lighting options to fix this issue with Spark Electrical.
Oberon Council , Clr Kerry Gibbons – 1. Kerry reported that a group of residents are interested in starting the Park Run in Oberon. This is a weekly 5km run which cannot cross any public roads. Ian suggested several options such as the Lowes Mount Rd walkway to Black Bullock Rd; Blenheim Forest; walkway at Oberon Dam. 2. Michael Gibbons asked to be raised – a suggestion for a Saturday morning Indoor Youth Sports Activity which utilises the Oberon Indoor and Tennis Centre. Chris/Rebecca to email Council’s Finance and Community Services Director Lynette Safranek to enquire about progressing this via Youth Council.
7. NEXT MEETING DATE AND MEETING CLOSE
The next meeting will be held on Wednesday 21 February 2018 at 4.30pm.
The dates for next years meetings are : 16 May , 15 August , 21 November 2018 at 4.30pm.
The Meeting closed at 5.35pm.
Minutes of the Oberon Sports Facilities Committee Meeting held on 15 November 2017
Page 25 Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
12.03 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE File: Governance/Meetings/Community Services Committee Author: Lynette Safranek, Finance & Community Services Director
Summary Minutes of the Community Services Committee held on 1 February 2018 is submitted for Council’s information.
Recommendations:
That Council: 1. That the Minutes of the Community Services Committee Meeting held on 1 February 2018 are received as information. 2. The Committee would like Council to advise on how they will deal with the Air Bed & Breakfast establishments within the LGA.
Comment The Minutes of Community Services Committee held 1 February 2018 FOLLOWS.
The following items were discussed at the February meeting: Park Run - Kate Bird has trialled a number of unsuccessful routes for the park run, with one option being from Rutter’s Ridge Road to Black Bullock Road which is 50m short of the 5km needed. The only road that would be crossed is the tip road, which is closed on Saturday mornings. Kate is enquiring if the small paddock on the corner is Government or Rail land as it would be the perfect starting and finishing point for the run. Council staff will gather more information and confirm ownership. The park run already has some volunteers and will be applying for 2018/19 Section 356 funding. Guinness World Records Planking – The recreation ground was inspected and it is too small for the challenge. A minimum of 2 acres is required to be able to accommodate 2000 people in groups of 50 with a space of 1.5m between, toilets, audience and cars. Clr Brenda Lyon has offered to ask Ian Gordon for the use of his land. SHEV immigration program – postponed until next meeting. Lifestyle and Wellness Festival Update - Clr Brenda Lyon provided a verbal update for the Committee. Advertising will start soon. The Event will be a gold coin entry at St Joseph’s School 10am to 4pm with lunch provided. There will be stall holders and activities and Galloping Gumnuts will be doing child care for those participating in the run. All money raised will go to Columbia for the purchase of equipment for residents. Bev Evans has submitted her resignation from the Community Services Committee. The members of the Committee would like a letter of thanks provided to Bev for her years of service. Columbia Homes – Clr Mark Kellam informed the committee a ratepayer has raised concerns with him regarding the level of care at Columbia Homes. The community member believes that it is not up to standard. Committee members were provided with the Aged Care Complaints phone number at the meeting and advised they would provide this to community members who are concerned.
26 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Air B&B – There are many air B&B’s appearing around the Oberon area and the Committee members would like Council to advise how they will deal with the these establishments. Will it be the same at the Bed & Breakfast establishments.
Weight Restrictions on Local Roads – Community members are wondering if there is a weight regulation on trucks going down every street in Oberon. There are concerns regarding the number of large trucks travelling on Oberon, Dart, Ross and other streets within Oberon and not using the Albion Street bypass. Clr Mark Kellam will raise this at the next TALC meeting for discussion.
ICE Drug Problem in Oberon –Committee members advised that they believe the ICE problem among working members of the community is rising. It is creating more problems with domestic violence. It was mentioned that the problem is with employees going ‘clean’ prior to employment for drug testing but return to using once employed as no testing is conducted. The Committee would like Council to have discussions with the local Police and local organisations to raise their concerns.
The Common Exercise Equipment – The instruction boards for the exercise equipment has fallen down on most pieces. Council staff will be asked to inspect and organise for the instructions to be refastened to the equipment, as this is causing some distress to the senior residents who are using the equipment.
The next meeting is scheduled to be held on Thursday 24 May 2018.
Notes:
27 | P a g e
OBERON COUNCIL – OBERON COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE Page 1 of 2
The Oberon Community Services Committee Meeting was held on 1 February 2018 in Council’s Committee Room, 137-139 Oberon St, Oberon.
The Meeting commenced at 2:00pm
ATTENDANCE
Clr Brenda Lyon Chairperson Clr Mark Kellam Councillor Clr Don Capel Councillor Sue Fisher-Smith Oberon Neighborhood Centre Representative Kate Bird Community Member Owen Rogers Community Representative Lynette Safranek Finance and Community Services Director Tamara Greenhalgh Finance and Community Services Trainee
APOLOGIES
Mayor Kathy Sajowitz Oberon Council Mayor Bev Evans Community Member Mark Boffa Community Member
1. APOLOGIES – see Attendance and Apologies above
2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST- Nil
3. BUSINESS ARISING FROM PREVIOUS MEETING a) Park Run - Kate Bird has trialled a number of unsuccessful routes for the park run, with one option being from Rutters Ridge road to Black Bullock road which is 50m short of the 5km needed. The only road that would be crossed is the tip road, which is closed on Saturday mornings. Kate is enquiring if the small paddock on the corner is Government or Rail land as it would be the perfect starting and finishing point for the run. Council staff will gather more information and confirm ownership.
The park run already has some volunteers and will be applying for 2018/19 Section 356 funding.
b) Guinness World Records Planking – The recreation ground was inspected and it is too small for the challenge. A minimum of 2 acres is required to be able to accommodate 2000 people in groups of 50 with a space of 1.5m between, toilets, audience and cars. Clr Brenda Lyon has offered to ask Ian Gordon for the use of his land.
4. REPORTS a) SHEV immigration program – postponed until next meeting for Mark Boffa to raise.
b) Lifestyle and Wellness Festival Update - Clr Brenda Lyon provided a verbal update for the Committee. Advertising will start soon. The Event will be a gold coin entry at St Joseph’s School 10am to 4pm with lunch provided. There will be stall holders and
Minutes of the Oberon Community Services Committee Meeting held on 1 February 2018
Page 28 OBERON COUNCIL – OBERON COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE Page 2 of 2
activities and Galloping Gumnuts will be doing child care for those participating in the run. All money raised will go to Columbia for the purchase of equipment for residents.
5. GENERAL BUSINESS a) Bev Evans has submitted her resignation from the Community Services Committee. The members of the Committee would like a letter of thanks provided to Bev for her years of service. b) Columbia Homes – Clr Mark Kellam informed the committee a ratepayer has raised concerns with him regarding the level of care at Columbia Homes. The community member believes that it is not up to standard. Committee members were provided with the Aged Care Complaints phone number at the meeting and advised they would provide this to community members who are concerned. c) Air B&B – There are many air B&B’s appearing around the Oberon area and the Committee members would like Council to advise how they will deal with the these establishments. Will it be the same at the Bed & Breakfast establishments.
Recommendation: The Committee would like Council to advise on how they will deal with the Air Bed & Breakfast establishments within the LGA.
d) Weight Restrictions on Local Roads – Community members are wondering if there is a weight regulation on trucks going down every street in Oberon. There are concerns regarding the number of large trucks travelling on Oberon, Dart, Ross and other streets within Oberon and no using the Albion Street bypass. Clr Mark Kellam will raise this at the next TALC meeting for discussion.
e) ICE Drug Problem in Oberon –Committee members advised that they believe the ICE problem among working members of the community is rising. It is creating more problems with domestic violence. It was mentioned that the problem is with employees going ‘clean’ prior to employment for drug testing but return to using once employed as no testing is conducted. The Committee would like Council to have discussions with the local Police and local organisations to raise their concerns.
f) The Common Exercise Equipment – The instruction boards for the exercise equipment has fallen down on most pieces. Council staff will be asked to inspect and organise for the instructions to be refastened to the equipment, as this is causing some distress to the senior residents who are using the equipment.
The next meeting will be held on Thursday 24 May 2018 at 2.00pm.
Meeting closed at 2.55 pm
Minutes of the Oberon Community Services Committee Meeting held on 1 February 2018
Page 29 Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
13. REPORTS FOR DECISION 13.01 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 10.2017.1006.1 – TWO STOREY DWELLING File No: PO24-25 Author: Shane Wilson, Planning and Development Director
Summary A Development Application for a proposed two storey dwelling has been received by Council and is referred to Council for the following reasons:
Variation to Development Control Plan for height plane & site density Request for Clause 4.6 exceptions to development standards of the Oberon Local Environmental Plan, 2013 (LEP 2013). Consider objection of the development.
Recommendation: That Council:
1. Approve the variation to Clause 4.6 - Exceptions to development standards of LEP 2013 for proposed boundary adjustment between Lots 2 & 3 DP 541312, development consent can be granted.
2. Grant conditional APPROVAL for Development Application 10.2017.100.1 for a two storey dwelling and subsequent boundary adjustment on Lot 2 in DP 541312 being known as 25 Fleming Street, Oberon in accordance with Section 80 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979. 3. A division be called in accordance with Section 375A of The Local Government Act 1993.
PROPOSAL: Plans and associated documents as FOLLOW.
Council is in receipt of a Development Application 10.2017.100.1 for the construction of a two storey dwelling consisting of, 3 Bedrooms, Living, Kitchen, Meals, Laundry, Garage, Ensuite, Bathroom, WC x 2, Workshop, Deck and Verandahs.
SUMMARY: To assess and recommend determination of DA10.2017.100.1. Recommendation will be for approval subject to conditions.
LOCATION OF THE PROPOSAL Legal Description : Lot: 2 in DP: 541312 Property Address : 25 Fleming Street, Oberon.
ZONING: The land is zoned R1 in accordance with Councils current Local Planning Instrument, being Local Environmental Plan (LEP) 2013. The proposed development is for the construction of a two storey dwelling, which is permissible within the zone.
30 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
EXISTING CONSENT THAT RELATE TO THE LAND: Lot 2 in DP 541312 is 613.4m2 there was an existing red brick dwelling on the lot which was approved for demolition DA10.2018.5.1. It is unknown when the dwelling was constructed, but it provides for permissibility for the proposed replacement dwelling. An inspection of the existing dwelling showed it contained two bedrooms, living area, kitchen, WC, laundry/bathroom.
BASIX: BASIX certificate has been supplied as it is required for the construction of a dwelling. All commitments have been supplied on the plans. The plans are not in conflict with the BASIX requirements.
PLANNING FOR BUSHFIRE PROTECTION: The property is not identified as being bushfire prone and therefore no further consideration is required.
FORESTRY BUFFER: The lot is not impacted by the forestry buffer, no problems envisaged.
INDUSTRY BUFFER ZONE: The proposed dwelling is within the buffer zone, double glazed windows proposed which will compensate for noise attenuation.
CONECTION OF SERVICES: The lot is serviced by electricity, town water and sewer.
ACCESS LOCATION: The proposed access will be on the southern side of the property and be accessed via the Fleming Street frontage. The driveway has been altered to provide the required 1m clearance from the power pole on the road reserve. The proposed access has been reviewed by Council’s Engineer with no concerns raised.
EASEMENTS: The lot is not burdened with any easements; the sewer main is located on the eastern boundary with the dwelling being clear of the main.
HERITAGE: No heritage items, relics or conservation areas are located on or adjoining this land. There will be minimal impact to the heritage significance of local heritage items I33 and I36 as they do not adjoin the proposed development.
NATURALLY OCCURING ASBESTOS: The site is not known to have naturally occurring asbestos, none visible on site.
31 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
PERMISSIBILITY: The Land is Zoned R1, a dwelling is permissible with Development Consent. The zone table and objectives are as follows:
Zone R1 General Residential
1. Objectives of zone To provide for the housing needs of the community. To provide for a variety of housing types and densities. To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.
2. Permitted without consent Home occupations
3. Permitted with consent Attached dwellings; Boarding houses; Business identification signs; Child care centres; Community facilities; Dwelling houses; Group homes; Home industries; Hostels; Multi dwelling housing; Neighbourhood shops; Places of public worship; Residential flat buildings; Respite day care centres; Roads; Semi-detached dwellings; Seniors housing; Shop top housing; Water reticulation systems; Any other development not specified in item 2 or 4.
4. Prohibited Agriculture; Air transport facilities; Airstrips; Amusement centres; Animal boarding or training establishments; Backpackers’ accommodation; Biosolids treatment facilities; Boat building and repair facilities; Boat launching ramps; Boat sheds; Camping grounds; Car parks; Caravan parks; Cemeteries; Charter and tourism boating facilities; Commercial premises; Correctional centres; Crematoria; Depots; Eco-tourist facilities; Electricity generating works; Entertainment facilities; Environmental facilities; Extractive industries; Farm buildings; Farm stay accommodation; Forestry; Freight transport facilities; Function centres; Heavy industrial storage establishments; Helipads; Highway service centres; Home occupations (sex services); Industrial retail outlets; Industrial training facilities; Industries; Jetties; Marinas; Mooring pens; Moorings; Mortuaries; Open cut mining; Passenger transport facilities; Public administration buildings; Recreation facilities (indoor); Recreation facilities (major); Recreation facilities (outdoor); Registered clubs; Research stations; Restricted premises; Rural industries; Rural workers’ dwellings; Service stations; Sewage treatment plants; Sex services premises; Signage; Storage premises; Transport depots; Truck depots; Vehicle body repair workshops; Vehicle repair stations; Veterinary hospitals; Warehouse or distribution centres; Waste or resource management facilities; Water recreation structures; Water supply systems; Wharf or boating facilities; Wholesale supplies
The proposed dwelling is permissible, within the R1 zone.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS (OTHER THAN DCP’s) Nil
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS (e.g. Section 94)
B.11 APPLICATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS Section 94 Contributions are not applicable for a replacement dwelling.
32 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS Any Environmental Planning Instrument Consider SEPPs, REPs & LEPs. RELEVANT Provisions of LEP (e.g. permissibility, development standards, heritage listing, advertising requirements of another authority who administers a SEPP or REP). Is a SEPP1 objection required?
No REP’s are applicable to the proposed development.
Applicable SEPP’s: SEPP 55; the existing building is to be demolished and potentially contains asbestos, a demolition condition will be imposed and a clearance certificate required at the end of demolition.
No tree removal or land clearing is proposed.
Local Environmental Plan It is considered that the proposed development complies with the objectives of the zone. As they is proposed to be an alteration of the existing boundaries between Lots 2 & 3 which will result in both being below the LEP minimum lot size for the zone, therefore an exception to the development standards must be considered as detailed below.
Clause 4.1 Minimum subdivision lot size (1) The objectives of this clause are as follows: (a) to ensure subdivision of land occurs in a manner that promotes suitable land uses and development, (b) to ensure subdivision occurs in a staged manner that minimises the cost to the community from the provision of public infrastructure and services, (c) to ensure rural lands are not fragmented in a manner that threatens their future use for agriculture or primary production, (d) to ensure subdivision is not likely to result in inappropriate impacts on the natural environment, including native vegetation, natural watercourses and habitats for threatened species and populations and endangered ecological communities. (2) This clause applies to a subdivision of any land shown on the Lot Size Map that requires development consent and that is carried out after the commencement of this Plan. (3) The size of any lot resulting from a subdivision of land to which this clause applies is not to be less than the minimum size shown on the Lot Size Map in relation to that land. (4) This clause does not apply in relation to the subdivision of individual lots in a strata plan or community title scheme. (4A) Despite subclause (3), land identified as “Area A” on the Lot Size Map may be subdivided to create lots of not less than 4,000 square metres if the consent authority is satisfied that each lot is, or will be, serviced by a sewage reticulation system and a water reticulation system.
The lot size map prescribes a minimum lot size of 800m2 in the Oberon General Residential Zone. Proposed future subdivision of existing lot 2 & 3 will result in an area of approximately 740m2 and 700m2. This is a change from the current sizes of 613m2 for lot 2 and 828m2 for lot 3. A condition would be placed upon this consent to ensure that the require subdivision is completed prior to the occupation of the dwelling, with the lot sizes to be similar to those identified above.
As both of the proposed lots are less than the minimum lot size the application must consider Clause 4.6 Exceptions to Development Standards of the Oberon Local Environmental Plan 2013.
Clause 4.6 Exceptions to Development Standards (1) The objectives of this clause are as follows: (a) to provide an appropriate degree of flexibility in applying certain development standards to particular development,
33 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
(b) to achieve better outcomes for and from development by allowing flexibility in particular circumstances. (2) Development consent may, subject to this clause, be granted for development even though the development would contravene a development standard imposed by this or any other environmental planning instrument. However, this clause does not apply to a development standard that is expressly excluded from the operation of this clause. (3) Development consent must not be granted for development that contravenes a development standard unless the consent authority has considered a written request from the applicant that seeks to justify the contravention of the development standard by demonstrating: (a) that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case, and (b) that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard. (4) Development consent must not be granted for development that contravenes a development standard unless: (a) the consent authority is satisfied that: (i) the applicant’s written request has adequately addressed the matters required to be demonstrated by subclause (3), and (ii) the proposed development will be in the public interest because it is consistent with the objectives of the particular standard and the objectives for development within the zone in which the development is proposed to be carried out, and (b) the concurrence of the Secretary has been obtained. (5) In deciding whether to grant concurrence, the Secretary must consider: (a) whether contravention of the development standard raises any matter of significance for State or regional environmental planning, and (b) the public benefit of maintaining the development standard, and (c) any other matters required to be taken into consideration by the Secretary before granting concurrence.
The consent authority received a written request by the applicant that seeks to justify the contravention of the development standard. In accordance with Part 3 (a) of Clause 4.6 the written request states that compliance with the development standard is both unreasonable and unnecessary as it is: The proposal complies with the objective of the zone, The development represents a high degree of compliance with the other development standards, The design of the building has considered the streetscape,
In accordance with Part 3 (b) of Clause 4.6 the written request states that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the minimum lot size, including: The proposed new development will enhance to the streetscape, Replace an outdated very small house with a high quality residence.
In accordance with Part 4 of Clause 3.6 the proposed development must be in the public interest as it is consistent with the objective of the standard. The primary objectives of Clause 4.1 Minimum Subdivision Lot Size are: (a) to ensure subdivision of land occurs in a manner that promotes suitable land uses and development, (b) to ensure subdivision occurs in a staged manner that minimises the cost to the community from the provision of public infrastructure and services, (c) to ensure rural lands are not fragmented in a manner that threatens their future use for agriculture or primary production,
34 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
(d) to ensure subdivision is not likely to result in inappropriate impacts on the natural environment, including native vegetation, natural watercourses and habitats for threatened species and populations and endangered ecological communities.
The proposed lot sizes are considered to be a reconfiguration of the current lot, in which there is minimal impact of the current land uses or local area, especially given that one of the lots is currently 187m2 less then the minimum lot size of 800m2. Any such boundary adjustment will result in the two lots having consistent size, and will provide the required open space and other ancillary dwelling requirements. The current Queen Street frontage is not suitable for access of another dwelling. The site is also located within an established urban area and the subdivision would utilise existing infrastructure to service the future development and will not result in any adverse costs to the community from the provision of public infrastructure or services.
The proposed development must also be consistent with the zone objectives which are: To provide for the housing needs of the community. To provide for a variety of housing types and densities. To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.
The development is consistent with these zone objectives.
Overall the non-compliance of proposed boundary adjustment will not impact on the environment or surrounding zones, it is consistent with the objectives of the zone and Minimum Lot Size Subdivision Standard.
Under Clause 64 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, Oberon Council can assume the Director-General’s concurrence for this exception to the development standard.
Any Development Control Plan Is the proposal consistent with the DCP? If not, is a variance warranted and has it been justified?
The DCP requires:
Height of Buildings The proposed dwelling will have a ceiling height of 5500mm which complies with the DCP, no problems envisaged.
Buffer Zones The proposed development is within the Industrial Buffer; the applicant has proposed double glazing for the dwelling which will comply with requirements for noise attenuation.
Building Height Plane The proposed dwelling is non-compliant with building height plane by 3100mm which represents a 56% difference; shadow diagrams have been provided showing overshadowing to the property to the south and east of the proposed dwelling.
The proposed dwelling has a deck that faces east and north and will overlook the properties in theses directions. The application was neighbour notified with one submission having been received, which raised concern about the potential loss of amenity due to the overlooking into the rear yard. The applicant has proposed the inclusion of full height powder coated plantation shutter privacy screens across the north side of the rear alfresco area and deck with blade restrictors which will prevent overlooking into the adjoining neighbours windows and rear yard.
35 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Setbacks from Street The proposed dwelling has a setback of 6.5m from the street and complies with the minimum setback requirements.
Orientation The proposed living areas will face north and east, taking advantage of the solar energy, which as been considered within the BASIX certificate.
Climate Control The addition to comply with BASIX requirements.
Visual impact The visual impact of the proposed dwelling is in accordance with the DCP, as it is a residential dwelling located within the appropriate zone.
Ridgetops The existing dwelling is not to be located on a ridgetop.
On Site Car Parking A double fronted garage is proposed and complies with the DCP; no problems envisaged.
Density Control The floor area of the proposed dwelling is approximately 344.9m2 which approximately consists of the house 204m2, garage 52m2 and decks & verandahs 90m2 proposed on the lot with a size of 613.4m2 equalling a density control of 0.56:1 which is non-compliant by 16%. The neighbouring lot to the south being some 828.30m2 is also owned by applicant has two dwellings totalling 218m2, applicant is proposing to undertake boundary adjustment to increase the size of lot 2 to achieve about 720m2 which would result in a ratio of 0.47:1 that is still 7% above the permitted density of the DCP. The proposed variation will not meet the minimum lot size provision of the LEP of 800m2 and will still not achieve the density provision of the DCP.
The applicant has submitted a request and justification for a variation to the DCP to allow a higher density ratio and also for an exception to the minimum lot size for the proposed boundary adjustment, under Clause 4.6 of the LEP.
Carport and Garages Garage proposed as part of dwelling, with double roller door accessible from the street.
Landscaping The dwelling is 6.5m from the boundary, no additional requirements.
Infill Housing The proposed dwelling is considered infill development. The dwelling is incorporating federation style construction at the street and will project forward of the existing dwellings to north and south which will enhance residential character, with the design considered suitable.
Stormwater Roof water to be conveyed to street, stormwater inlet required to be installed at owners cost. Any planning agreement that has been entered into under Section 93F, or any draft planning agreement that a developer has offered to enter into under Section 93F? Nil.
36 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Any matters prescribed by the regulations that apply to the land Refer to clause 92, 93, & 94 of the Regulation. If a DA for demolition, the provisions of AS 2601- 1991; The Demolition of Structures. Fire Safety considerations – DA that does not seek the rebuilding, alteration, enlargement or extension of the building. Consent Authority may require buildings to be upgraded – DA comprising the rebuilding, alteration enlargement or extension, take into consideration whether it is appropriate to require the building to be brought into conformity with the BCA.
A Development Application and Section 68 have been submitted for the proposed dwelling.
The likely impacts of that development, including environmental impacts on both the natural and built environments, and social and economic impacts in the locality
The relevant matters are up to assessment and merit. As a guide only, the following may be considered if they are considered to be of relevance to the proposal. Amenity, streetscape, scenic quality, bulk, scale character, density, design, adjacent land use compatibility, solar access, noise, access & traffic, utility services, heritage, water, soils, air, flora & fauna, wastes, safety, security, crime prevention, natural hazards, social, economic & cumulative impacts.
The proposal is the construction of a new dwelling within the R1 zone. It is considered that the physical construction of the dwelling will have minimal impacts upon the amenity of the area as the external fabric of the construction work is in keeping with similar structures in the area.
The dwelling is single storey at the front and increases to double storey at the rear due to the topography of the land.
The size of the proposed dwelling is considered to reflect the size and character of many new dwelling being built today. It is acknowledged that the size of the houses in the local area, a far lesser than the proposed, with the majority being around 140m2. It is noted that there is a larger school building directly opposite the development site, with similar bulk and scale to the proposed.
Although the proposed dwelling is large on a difficult building lot, there are no unacceptable problems with over shadowing, as all properties adjoining the property will receive greater than 4 hours of winter sun into the properties.
As mentioned earlier in the report, concerns have been raised about the loss of privacy due to the location of the verandah, in relation to the proximity of the neighbouring property bedroom and lounge room windows.
The applicant has proposed the inclusion of full height powder coated plantation shutter privacy screens across the north side of the rear alfresco area and deck with blade restrictors which will prevent overlooking into the adjoining neighbours windows and rear yard.
37 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
The proposed deck is some 8m way from the adjoining dwelling, with the proposed floor level being nearly the same height of the roof of the adjoining land. The majority of the deck area accessible from the meals area is only 9m2 and serviced by a bi-fold window in the kitchen with a screen proposed for screening, the verandah area which runs along the northern boundary is only 1.5m wide and considered only suitable for use a walkway. It is expected that the main outdoor living area will be the alfresco located at the rear of the building and is some 4m away from the boundary.
The proposed screening treatment as proposed by the applicant is considered to provide a reasonable degree of privacy to the adjoining properties and is believed to satisfy the planning principles for privacy.
The Suitability of the site for the development Does the proposal suit the site? Bulk/Scale/Sensitivity? Are there any natural or man made hazards?
The site is considered to be suitable for the development. The development is permissible in the zone and is consistent with the aims and objectives of the R1 zone. There are no human or natural hazards that would cause the proposal to not be considered. As such the application is considered to be suitable for the site. Visual impact is considered localised and on balance suitable.
Any submissions made in accordance with this Act or the Regulations If relevant, consider public and authority submissions. Do submissions relate to valid Planning issues?
NIL.
The public interest Have any genuine Planning issues been raised in by the wider public? Is there genuine irrefutable concerns relating to public health & safety?
Neighbour notification was undertaken from the 9th to the 25th January 2018, with a second letter sent to an adjoining neighbour after they stated that they had not received the earlier notification. At the end of the notification period one submission had been received (copy separately provided), with the major concerns identified below and considered within the report and the table below.
Submission concerns Comments "Gross Invasion Of Privacy" and request that Screening is an acceptable and appropriate the neighbours reposition the verandah away method of retaining privacy. from its proposed proximity to my bedroom / lounge room.
Screen is to be installed after the house is Any such works will need to be completed prior built. to the issue of an occupation certificate.
Increase of the wind tunnelling affect along the Building setbacks are consistent with the entrance/patio area of my house. planning and building code requirements.
Lack of consultation with residents. This Notification undertaken upon the lodgement of proposal was developed long before I was the application and a second letter sent to invited to lodge my submission. neighbour once they advised they had not received their letter.
38 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Architectural design is a personal preference New dwelling within an older non-heritage but this design is significantly different from the impacted residential area. surrounding local styles of properties.
The height of the building from the boundary See comments in report fence.
It is noted that no trees would be removed but No trees onsite at time of lodgement of the when the block was purchased all trees were application, thus condition or alike is unknown. cut down and removed.
The Planning control is there for a reason. If Refer to report for consideration. the Council allows these obscure boundary changes to 27 Fleming Street, they then set a poor precedent for future development. The building is clearly too big for the size of the lot. The developer admits that it is a non complying application.
Trees and/or hedges have not been included It has been acknowledged via planning in the Development Application along principles, that the use vegetative screens are neighbouring fence lines (25 Fleming St/23 problematic. Fleming St) to return significant environmental benefits including mutual privacy.
Drainage from this location is generally very Run off will be decreased as there is a good but a large house that takes up the entire requirement for the stormwater from all new lot will significantly increase water run-off onto works to be retained or discharged to a legal neighbouring properties. point of discharge.
Plumbing/sewerage continues to be an No additional loading is being placed on the unresolved issue at this location due to the current infrastructure, as a result of the new already established but failing infrastructure. dwelling.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The application is permissible in the zone and is consistent with the aims and objectives of that zone. Any perceived impacts can be minimised by onsite techniques in place or through conditions of consent. On balance the development dwelling and associated boundary adjustment is considered suitable for the site and therefore it is recommended that the variation to the DCP and the exception to minimum lot size requirements should be supported.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF CONSENT That the development for a two storey dwelling and subsequent Boundary Adjustment on Lot 2 in DP 541312 being known as 25 Fleming Street, Oberon be recommended for approval subject to the following conditions:
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1. Approved Plans The development is to be carried out generally in accordance with the approved stamped plans
39 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Plan Title Prepared/Drawn by Date/reference Architectural Plans Robin White Sept 2017 BASIX Certificate Robin White Design 865215S_04; 12 January 2018 Slab Design Calare Civil Consulting 17.1195; 7 December Engineers 2017 Statement of Robin White Sept 2017 Environmental Effects
except as otherwise provided by the conditions of this determination.(Note:- modifications to the approved plans will require the lodgement and consideration by Council of a modification pursuant to Section 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act).
Reason:- To confirm and clarify the terms of Council’s approval.
2. Clearance Certificate for demolition Prior to commencement of works, submit an asbestos clearance certificate prepared by a NATA accredited occupational hygienist stating the site is suitable for residential development.
Reason:- To ensure the proposal complies with the requirements of AS 2601-2001.
3. Notice of Commencement At least two (2) days prior to the commencement of building works, the applicant is required to submit to Council the attached “Notice of Commencement of Building or Subdivision Works and Appointment of Principal Certifying Authority”.
Reason:- To meet the requirements of Section 81A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
4. Hours of Work Building works involving the use of electric or pneumatic tools or other noisy operations shall be carried out only between 7.00 am and 8.00 pm on weekdays and between 8.00 am to 8.00 pm Saturdays. No work shall be undertaken on Sundays and Public Holidays.
Reason:- To ensure building works do not cause noise nuisance to surrounding premises after hours and on Sundays and public holidays.
5. Sediment Control To contain soil and sediment on the property, controls are to be implemented prior to clearing of the site vegetation and the commencement of site works. This will include the installation of a sediment fence with returned ends across the low side of the site so that all water flows through. These shall be maintained at no less than 70% capacity at all times. Drains, gutters, roadways etc., shall be kept clean and free of sediment. Soil erosion fences shall remain and must be maintained until all disturbed areas are restored by turfing, paving, revegetation.
Reason:- To prevent the movement of soil and sediment in accordance with the blue book.
6. Site Identification A sign is to be erected in a prominent position at the entrance of the work site, stating that unauthorised access is prohibited, and showing the name and contact phone number of the person or company in charge of construction on the site.
Reason:- To identify the site and builder, and prevent unauthorised access.
40 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
7. Copy of Approval On Site A copy of the development consent and approved plans and specifications shall be kept on site at all times.
Reason:- To ensure a copy of the approval is available for builders/tradespersons on site.
8. Builders Toilets Prior to the commencement of works, temporary toilet facilities shall be provided on site for the use of builders or tradespersons during the construction works.
Reason:- To ensure adequate standard of amenities are available to workers on site.
9. Builders Waste All building rubbish, including that which can be wind blown, shall be suitably contained on site, until disposed of at Council’s Solid Waste Disposal Depot.
Reason:- To ensure the building site and surroundings are kept in a clean and tidy condition and to prevent a nuisance to surrounding premises.
10. Stormwater disposal Stormwater from the development is to be conveyed by approved drains and connected to the inter-allotment drainage system.
Reason:- To ensure compliance with BASIX and that stormwater is disposed of to the satisfaction of Councils Planning and Development Director.
11. Acoustic Attenuation Clause 6.6 of Councils LEP 2013 applies to the land as such, evidence is to be provided to and approved by Council that the dwelling can achieve an appropriate reduction to identified noise emissions (45dBa) by way of appropriate window attenuation. This will be required prior to the issue of an occupation certificate.
Reason:- To ensure that the proposed development complies with the objectives of Clause 6.6 Development within a designated buffer area of the Local Environmental Plan 2013.
12. Driveway/Access Construction Driveway access is to be constructed in accordance with the attached Council Policy 4103 - Driveway Accesses to Properties, Standard Duty Footpath & Gutter Crossings (Residential). Two inspections are to be undertaken by Council’s Engineering Department and applicable fees paid in accordance with Council’s current Schedule of Fees and Charges.
Reason:- To ensure adequate provision is made for vehicle access.
13. Manufacturers Roof Truss Specification Manufacturers roof truss specifications shall be submitted to Council prior to the frame inspection. The details shall specify member sizes and spacings, roof pitch, fixing details, wind loading, ground snow loading of 2 kPa, name and address of manufacturer etc.
Reason:- To ensure roof trusses are suitably designed for the local conditions.
14. Durable Termite Notice A durable notice must be permanently fixed to the building in a prominent location, such as the electricity meter box, indicating method of termite risk management, date of installation of the system, life expectancy of chemical barrier (if used) and installer’s recommendations of frequency of inspections.
41 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Reason:-To comply with Part 3.1.3.2 of the Building Code of Australia and to inform future owners of the building.
15. Smoke Alarm Installation Smoke alarms are required to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia. Multiple smoke alarms are to be interconnected.
Reason:- To ensure compliance with Part 3.7.2 of the Building Code of Australia.
16. Stairs and Balustrades The balustrades and stairs if required are to comply with the requirements of Part 3.9.1 and 3.9.2, Building Code of Australia, Housing Provisions; i. The height of the balustrade must not be less than 1 metre and the space between balusters or the width of any opening in the balustrade is not more than 125 mm. ii. That the height of handrail to stairways, must not be less than 865 mm above the nosing of the stair treads and the floor of the landing, access bridge or the like; and the space between the balusters or the width of any opening in balustrades is not more than 125mm. Where wire balustrades are used, certification indicating compliance with the Building Code of Australia of is required prior to inspection. iii. The stairs are to comply with the requirements for slip resistance.
Reason:- To ensure compliance with the Building Code of Australia.
17. Notice of Work A Notice of Work (NoW) shall be submitted by the plumber to Council 48 hours prior to works commencing onsite.
Reason:- To ensure compliance with the NSW Plumbing and Drainage Act 2011.
18. Certificate of Compliance A certificate of compliance for the plumbing works associated with this approval shall be submitted by the plumber to Council and the owner upon completion of all drainage works.
Reason:- To ensure compliance with the NSW Plumbing and Drainage Act 2011.
19. Sewer Service Diagram A Sewer Service Diagram (SSD) shall be drafted by the plumber on the standard form and submitted to Council and the owner upon completion of all drainage works.
Reason:- To ensure compliance with the NSW Plumbing and Drainage Act 2011.
20. Works Only By Licensed Contractor All plumbing and drainage work in the building and from the building to the septic tank must be carried out by a licensed plumber/drainer in accordance with the requirements of Australian Standard 3500-2003 “National Plumbing and Drainage Code”.
Reason:-To comply with Australian Standard 3500-2003 “National Plumbing and Drainage Code” and Clause 20 of the Local Government (Approvals) Regulation 2005.
21. Council Inspections Forty-eight (48) hours notice shall be given to Council for inspection of the following:-
Internal and external drainage lines, septic tank and effluent disposal area prior to backfilling. The licensed plumber/drainer shall be on site at the time of inspection, and the drainage lines shall be charged.
42 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
The completed septic system and effluent disposal area.
Reason:-To enable Council to assess compliance with the general terms of the approval and for compliance with Australian Standard 3500-2003 “National Plumbing and Drainage Code”.
22. No alteration without prior Council approval The completed building is not to be altered externally in character or colour without the prior consent of Council.
Reason:-To ensure the external appearance of the development is not obtrusive or offensive and does not degrade the visual quality of the surrounding area.
23. Boundary Adjustment Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, a registered subdivision plan is to be submitted to Council showing a boundary adjustment between lots 2 & 3 DP541312 with each lot to have a lot size of approximately 740m2 to 700m2.
Reason:-To ensure that the lot density and amenity for each lot is retained.
24. Subdivision Certificate A Subdivision Certificate will be required to be determined prior to the registration of your plan of subdivision. The conditions contained in this Consent must be complied with prior to the issue of a Subdivision Certificate.
Reason:- To comply with the requirements of Section 109C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act.
25. Subdivision Certificate Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, full height powder coated plantation shutter privacy screens are to be installed across the north side of the rear alfresco area and deck with blade restrictors and the fence screen as shown must be installed.
Reason:- To retain the amenity of the adjoining property, by preventing overlooking into the adjoining neighbours windows and rear yard.
26. Occupation Certificate The applicant is to obtain an Occupation Certificate pursuant to Section 109C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, from either Council or an accredited certifying authority prior to occupation of the building.
Reason:- Because it is in the public interest that an Occupation Certificate be issued prior to occupation of the building. Section 79C (1)(e) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as amended.
PRESCRIBED CONDITIONS OF CONSENT
The following conditions are known as “Prescribed Conditions” and are required by the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 to be imposed as part of any development consent whether or not they are relevant to the development approved under this consent. Please do not hesitate to contact staff in Council’s Development Department who will be happy to advise you as to whether or not the conditions are relevant to your consent.
43 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
1. All building work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia (as in force on the date the application for the relevant construction certificate or complying development certificate was made).
Reason:- So that the development complies with the requirements imposed under Clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
2. In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contact of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of the Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any building work authorised to be carried out by the consent commences.
Reason:- So that the development complies with the requirements imposed under Clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
3. Residential building work within the meaning of the Home Building Act 1989 must not be carried out unless the principal certifying authority for the development to which the work relates (not being the Council) has given the Council written notice of the following information: in the case of work for which a principal contractor is required to be appointed: (i) the name and licence number of the principal contractor, and (ii) the name of the insurer by which the work is insured under Part 6 of the Act, in the case of work to be done by an owner-builder: (i) the name of the owner-builder, and (ii) if the owner-builder is required to hold an owner-builder permit under that Act, the number of the owner-builder permit.
Reason:- So that the development complies with the requirements imposed under Clause 98B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
4. A sign must be erected in a prominent position on any site on which building work, subdivision work or demolition work is being carried out: showing the name, address and telephone number of the principal certifying authority for the work, and showing the name of the principal contractor (if any) for any building work and a telephone number on which that person may be contacted outside working hours, and stating that unauthorised entry to the work site is prohibited.
Any such sign is to be maintained while the building work is being carried out and must be removed when the work has been completed.
Note: This condition does not apply to building work that is carried out inside an existing building that does not affect the external walls of the building.
Reason:- So that the development complies with the requirements imposed under Clause 98A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
5. Any development that involves an excavation that extends below the level of the base of the footings of a building on adjoining land, the person having the benefit of the development consent must, at the person’s own expense:
i. protect and support the adjoining premises from possible damage from the excavation, and ii. where necessary, underpin the adjoining premises to prevent any such damage.
44 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
NOTE: The condition referred to in sub clause (1) does not apply if the person having the benefit of the development consent owns the adjoining land or the owner of the adjoining land has given consent in writing to that condition not applying.
Reason:- So that the development complies with the requirements imposed under Clause 98E of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
Notes:
45 | P a g e
Page 46 Page 47
VARIATION JUSTIFICATION & REQUEST (Response to letter of objection)
For
Demolish existing dwelling and erect a two storey
dwelling. Subdivision for boundary adjustment
At
25 Fleming Street Oberon
For
B. & S. Harman
Page 48 25 Fleming Street: Variation Request
1.0 HEIGHT OF BUILDING & BUILDING HEIGHT PLANE Overview of Justification The proposed Building Height (BH) and Building Height Plane (BHP) development standard, as permitted by the Oberon Local Environment Plan 2013 (Oberon LEP), is founded in the context of the Oberon Development Control Plan and the characteristics of the site on which the proposed development is located. This request to allow the BH and BHP of a dwelling at No.25 Fleming Street, Oberon, as shown in drawings A01, S02, A03, A4 and A05 is considered fully justified in the context of compliance with the DCP, the set of circumstances surrounding the project, and in terms of it satisfying the established tests associated with compliance with the objectives in the general for housing development provisions. The principal arguments in favour of this building height and envelope are detailed in this request. The height as detailed in the architectural drawings is considered to be fully justified and warranted.
Project Background The property, known as 25 Fleming Street is located on the eastern side of the street, approximately midway between Ramsgate Lane and Queen Street. Opposite is St Josephs School. It adjoins three allotments. The proposal involves the demolition of the existing dwelling and the erection of a new dwelling which is single storey at the front and two storeys at the rear with basement workshop on the lower floor. All of the living and bedrooms spaces are on the main floor level.
Summary of Arguments Any BH statutory control beyond the DCP requirements would unnecessarily and unreasonably constrain the development potential of the Site, contrary to strategic planning for the responsible growth of Oberon. An exemption from the Building Height Plane (BHP) is sought under DCP Clause C.5.6.
1. Compliance with Objectives of the LEP - Under the LEP, the property is zoned General Residential R1. The proposal is permissible with Council consent. The objectives of the zone are: • To provide for the housing needs of the community. • To provide for a variety of housing types and densities. • To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents. The development of dwelling house suited to the needs of an aging demographic migrating from rural farms to the Oberonurban area to be able access services and live in comfort independently is an identified housing type needed by the community. This type of house in this location close to medical services is rare and would add to the variety of available housing. Note that the Height of Buildings clause was not adopted in the Oberon LEP.
2. Compliance with the DCP - The Oberon DCP Clause C.4 defines the meaning of Building Height as the vertical distance between natural ground level and the finished level of the uppermost ceiling in the building or where there is no ceiling or a "cathedral" ceiling, the level at which the main roof beams meet the top plate. The proposed maximum building height under this definition is 5. 4m above natural surface at the rear eastern end of the building. The height above the natural surface decreases from this end, transitioning to single storey at the front with a BH above natural surface of 3.2m. The maximum building height allowable is 5.5m. The building is compliant throughout.
3. Site Constraints – The allotment is narrow at 15.112m wide. The development site slopes from the front boundary to the rear boundary. The steep slope of the allotment which falls over 3m from front to rear means that any single storey development must be two storeys at the rear if the floor level is to be maintained at the same height throughout. This is a desirable design for an ageing population and is one of the major housing needs in Oberon. As this is an LEP objective the development complies. In order to achieve an accessible design for adaptable living in the future for the aging owners the proposal has Page 49 adopted a main living floor at a single level with only non-habitable space on the rear lower floor. The height of the building results from this design consideration.
4. Compliance with Objectives of the DCP - The objectives in general for housing development are: (a) ensure residential development will not significantly overshadow adjoining properties or (b) ensure residential development will not significantly reduce privacy enjoyed by adjoining properties. (c) to establish the maximum limit within which buildings can be designed and floor space can be achieved, (d) to permit building heights that encourage high quality urban form, (e) to provide building heights that maintain satisfactory sky exposure and daylight to buildings, key areas and the public domain, (f) to nominate heights that will provide an appropriate transition in built form and land use intensity.
The building height adopted in the proposal does not give rise to any adverse amenity impact to the neighbouring buildings in terms of overshadowing, visual bulk and scale. It is proposed that an amendment to the development adds privacy screens to the north deck/balcony and the north side of the rear alfresco area. (Refer to Section 8 for details). This would ensure that the development would not significantly reduce privacy. The current development incorporates a number of design measures which are conducive of minimising impacts to the neighbouring dwellings including additional side setback spaces on the north. The northern verandah and deck are designed to break the visual bulk of the building and to give internal privacy to the occupants and neighbours by reducing downwards vision from the living space. The narrowness and provision of other outdoor areas proves that it is not designed for use of the occupants as outdoor recreation or sitting space. The shadow diagrams address the solar access requirements. The new built form will result in consistent form and massing across the streetscape and will not result in a development that extends beyond the building height requirements.
5. The proposal promotes the objectives of the zone and will not result in any significant adverse environmental, social or economic impacts on the locality. The proposal is considered to be in the public interest.
6. The two storey form of the building is not apparent from Fleming Street and it presents as single storey in the streetscape. The height at the front varies from 3.2m on the north side to 2.8m on the south front side. These are acceptable and compliant heights. The adjoining lot to the north is a potential development block and when building are built thereon, the side of the proposed residence will be obscured. The southern mass of the building is obscured from Queen street by the existing embankment.
7. Under DCP C.5.5 Building Height Plane the objectives are to ensure that residential development will not significantly:
(a) Increase the overshadowing on adjoining properties; (b) Reduce the level of privacy on adjoining properties;
The proposal does not fit into the building plane of the Oberon DCP which requires that a projected angle of 45 degrees from a height of 1.5m above the natural ground. The first floor wall on the north is setback over 4m from the side boundary and complies. The edge of the deck, eave of the house and roof of the north verandah proposal are the only building elements that are non-compliant on this side. However this is compliant with the SEPP Complying Development Codes for dwelling houses and attached development. 3.3m (horizontal distance) of the roof and wall of the garage on the south side lies within the building height plane of the DCP. However this is compliant with the Complying Development Codes for dwelling houses and attached development, as it falls within the required envelope, is of masonry construction and has no windows on the south side. On the north side towards the front the DCP building envelope reveals an encroachment 1.1m high by 2.7 wide Page 50 taking in the angle of the roof and towards the rear 2.2m high by 5.2m wide taking in the angle of the roof. The narrowness and length of the allotment precludes greater variety in the side setbacks but articulation has still been achieved.
It is considered that the proposal will not result in any unreasonable amenity impacts and satisfies the objectives of the control.
Under State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) the maximum height of walls within 900mm of a boundary must be less than 3.3m above the existing ground and the development is compliant. Under SEPP the rear setback must be a minimum of 12m for an allotment >900sq.m. and for the 613sq.m. original allotment, must be 8m. The proposal has a rear setback of 7.15m to the building wall and 5.65m to the verandah. This is a 12% decrease in the distance required. However, the non- compliance with the requirement is not considered to be significant. It is also considered that the proposal is consistent with the objectives of the controls and the non-compliance arises from the steep slope and the narrowness of the frontage which forces a large proportion of the development to the rear. The proposal is considered to promote the efficient use of land and is sufficient for the development in terms of provision of landscaping, vehicular covered spaces and access whilst maintaining amenity in relation to overshadowing, privacy and views by having sensitive layout of buildings and privacy screening on the north outdoor sitting areas. Under SEPP The maximum height of the floor level of the deck or verandah must be less than 2.0m where within 2m of a rear or side boundary. The maximum height of the floor level of the deck or verandah must be less than 3.0m where within 3m to 6m of a rear or side boundary. The maximum height of the floor level of the deck or verandah must be less than 4.0m where greater than 6m from of a rear or side boundary. The development is compliant. Under SEPP the total floor area of all decks and verandahs that are within 6m of a side or rear boundary and have a finished floor level of not more than 2m above the existing ground level must be less than 12.0sq.m. The area of verandah is 14.2 sq.m., which is 15% over the allowable area.
The narrowness of the allotment and desirability for northerly solar access for the occupants in Oberon’s climate with construction of optimal 1500mm depth of shading to northerly glazing to maximise solar gain mean that the verandah areas are required on the north side which is additional to the large alfresco area. The narrow north and east verandahs are in not an area that will be used by residents, but rather they are a design feature to comply with solar access and to visually reduce the bulk of the building. The east verandah protects from heat gain into the main bedroom. These verandahs are not additional outdoor living space but rather solar controls. The outdoor alfresco area is additional to this and is located under the main roof. The steepness of the block of land necessitates having the verandahs adjoining living space so that they are at the same level and not one storey below at ground level. Building setbacks from the street boundary are consistent with prevailing setbacks of adjoining and nearby buildings. It is considered that the proposal will not result in any unreasonable amenity impacts and satisfies the objectives of the control. Although the privacy louvres will be erected towards the end of the construction period they will be in place prior to occupation as part of the certification process.
8. Exemption Under DCP C.5.6 an exemption from the building height plane requirements is claimed because clear advantages have been achieved by incorporating design principles on a narrow allotment. In order to comply with C.5.8, C.5.9 and C.5.10 of the DCP the outdoor areas and living space are oriented for protection from prevailing winds. The building is oriented so that the living area has a northerly aspect for passive solar gain, 1.5m wide verandahs for both a reduction of solar gain in summer and maximising solar gain in winter. Large windows face the north side. The garages are on the south side. The deep alfesco verandah provides shade for indoor living spaces from the easterly sun in summer and it is shielded from winds to the south and west. This will minimise energy usage, maximise comfort of the residents and provide Page 51 character to open spaces and the facades. The outdoor spaces provide for a variety of uses, including clothes drying to reduce energy costs. The climate has been considered with the use of thermally efficient Hebel panel walls. There is minimal glazing to the southern walls. Garages, laundry, pantry, ensuite, and wardrobes located on the south side. The roof is steeply pitched to shed snow build-up and provide an insulation space in Oberon’s harsh climate.
An aesthetically appealing building has been achieved within the site constraints. The building optimises and exploits the narrow site’s potential. By adjusting the boundary to the south and widening the boundary offset on the north, overshadowing and privacy are not significantly affected. An exemption from the DCP building height plane is justifiable because of the restrictions due to allotment narrowness, site depth and land slope, and the responsive design of the development.
It is proposed that an amendment to the development includes the provision of full height powdercoated plantation shutter privacy screens across the north side of the rear alfresco area and deck with blade restrictors which prevent overlooking into the adjoining neighbour’s windows or down into the yard. The occupants of the development building will be able to look out horizontally but not down. This amendment would facilitate the removal of the screen on the north fence at the deck location as this would be obsolete. Importantly this proposed amendment to the design has been formulated as a result of issues raised by a neighbour. It is considered that with this amendment visual privacy and amenity impacts on the neighbouring property are not unreasonable.
The non-compliance with the Building Height Plane development standards is therefore acceptable and does not contribute to any adverse visual bulk and scale impacts given the built form. A DCP compliant proposal would have the same impacts due to the slope of the land.
9. Clause 4.6 of the Oberon LEP 2013 is the statutory mechanism that allows the consent authority to grant consent to development that departs from a development standard imposed by the LEP. The clause aims to provide an appropriate degree of flexibility in applying certain development standards, including the Building Height Plane control of the DCP, to achieve better outcomes that are in the public interest.
Clause 4.6(3)-(5) of the Oberon LEP 2013 provides that:
4.6 Exceptions to development standards
(3) Development consent must not be granted for development that contravenes a development standard unless the consent authority has considered a written request from the applicant that seeks to justify the contravention of the development standard by demonstrating: (a) that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case, and (b) that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard. (4) Development consent must not be granted for development that contravenes a development standard unless: (a) the consent authority is satisfied that: (i) the applicant’s written request has adequately addressed the matters required to be demonstrated by subclause (3), and (ii) the proposed development will be in the public interest because it is consistent with the objectives of the particular standard and the objectives for development within the zone in which the development is proposed to be carried out, and (b) the concurrence of the Secretary has been obtained. (5) In deciding whether to grant concurrence, the Secretary must consider: (a) whether contravention of the development standard raises any matter of significance for State or regional environmental planning, and (b) the public benefit of maintaining the development standard, and (c) any other matters required to be taken into consideration by the Secretary before granting concurrence. Page 52
I submit that compliance with the standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case because the proposal complies with the objectives of the standard and the zone. The proposed development will be in the public interest because it is consistent with the objectives for the development within the zone in which the development is proposed to be carried out. In addition to consistencies with the objectives of the zone, the proposed development represents a high degree of compliance with the predominant DCP and SEPP building controls which therefore demonstrates that the Building Height and Building Height Plane principles can be supported on the site and that strict compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary. It is proposed that an amendment to the development includes the provision of full height powdercoated plantation shutter privacy screens across the north side of the rear alfresco area and deck with blade restrictors which prevent overlooking into the adjoining neighbour’s windows. Importantly this proposed amendment to the design has been formulated as a result of issues raised by a neighbor. It is considered that with this amendment, visual privacy amenity impacts on neighbouring properties are not unreasonable. All other amenity impacts are no greater than that which is contemplated by LEP and DCP controls, in particular for overshadowing and solar access. The development, with the screening amendment is designed so that its occupants of the development building enjoy visual and acoustic privacy, whilst maintaining a reasonable degree of privacy to adjoining and nearby properties.
The single storey appearance of the proposed residence in the streetscape is modest. The height, bulk and scale will not be out of character when viewed from Fleming Street. Given the minor and localised nature of the variation, high degree of compliance with other building controls and the site restrictions of sloping land and narrowness of the allotment, it is considered that the proposed residence does not represent an overdevelopment of the subject site. The articulated nature of the building and verandahs giving horizontally visual breaks to the height further minimise the bulk and scale. The render painted finish and decorative horizontal banding further diminish the impact of the two storey part of the structure. The absence of environmental impacts associated with view loss and overshadowing underlines the reasonableness of the Building Height Plane variation. Whilst it is noted that a degree of overshadowing will occur, adjoining properties continue to receive 4 hours of solar access. It is thereby considered that the circumstances are particular to the subject site and the proposed development which confirms the reasonable nature of the variation. The variation allows for a better planning outcome than the existing building and it is considered to be a superior outcome when compared to other forms of compliant development that would be permissible and compliant on the site.
The localised areas of the proposal which exceed the Building Height Plane are not responsible for much greater environmental impacts than a proposal with a compliant BHP. Given the areas of impact are minor there is no sound planning justification to impose restrictions. The BHP variation is not associated with overdevelopment of the subject site. The positive streetscape outcomes associated with the development and high amenity as well as the replacement of an outdated very small dwelling house with a high quality residence confirms that there are sufficient environmental grounds to support the design.
It is considered that the proposed development is of a bulk, scale and character that it is compatible with the surrounding freestanding residences and the potential development site to the north may have similar design outcomes. The proposed building envelope is consistent with front, rear and side setback requirements and the setbacks are consistent with surrounding buildings. The development is compatible with the single residence character of the area and pattern of development. The single storey nature of the front is consistent with the streetscape. This confirms that the proposed development is of a size, scale and visual character of the locality and the existing pattern of development. The proposed development is not in a conservation area and is not adjacent to any heritage items.
Page 53 2.0 Summary & Conclusion
Consistency with objectives of the development standard: The proposed development is consistent with the objectives of the height of building plane development standard as discussed in this letter.
Consistency with objectives of the zone: The proposed development is consistent with the objectives R1 land use zone as discussed in this letter. Overall public interest: In accordance with the requirements of Clause 4.6(4)(a)(ii), the proposed development and variation to the development standard is in the public interest because it achieves the objectives of both the development standard and the land use zone. Conclusion on clause 4.6(4)(a)(ii) and overall clause 4.6(4)(a)(ii): Despite the proposed variation to the numerical BHP control, it has been demonstrated that the proposed BHP, and indeed the building envelope, is consistent with the objectives of the Oberon R1 land use zone and the BHP development standard under the Oberon LEP 2013. Accordingly the consent authority can be reasonably satisfied that this written request has adequately addressed matters in clause 4.6 (3) and that the proposed development would be in the public interest because it provides a number of benefits, and is consistent with the objectives of the particular standard and the objectives for development within the zone in which the development is proposed to be carried out. Other matters for consideration: The development does not raise ant matter of significance for State or regional planning. Conclusion on clause 4.6(5)(b)(ii) : There is no public benefit in maintaining the BHP development standard in this case. Maintaining and enforcing the development standard in this case would unreasonably constrain the development of this site, and unnecessarily reduce the benefits the development brings. An undesirable precedent will not be set as the site is unique. The site and project specific circumstances could not have been foreseen by Oberon Council when setting the generic Height of Buildings controls and it warrants a better outcome to be delivered. It is considered to be in the public interest that a variation be supported in this case.
The above assessment is considered to demonstrate that the intrusion of the building beyond the Building Height Plane is not responsible for any significant or unreasonable impact beyond that of a compliant building. A compliant building would still need to address overlooking, overshadowing and solar access impacts. The proposed amendment incorporating privacy screening on the north side is compatible with reasonable controls and ensures there is no direct overlooking. It is considered that the development is consistent with the objectives of the zone and strict compliance with the Building Height Plane development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in this instance. The objectives of the standard are achieved notwithstanding non-compliance with the standard. The development is in the public interest because it is consistent with the objectives of the zone as discussed in this letter. The clause 4.6 request demonstrates that the proposed development will deliver a good outcome for the site and optimises the opportunity to establish a high quality development that revitalises an under-used residential site. For the reasons set out in this written document of request the proposal should be approved in accordance with the flexibility allowed under clause 4.6 of the Oberon LEP 2013.
Page 54 Page 55 Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
13.02 PLANNING PROPOSAL – 2519 O’CONNELL ROAD File No: PR186-2519 Author: Brendan O’Loan Consulting Town Planner / Shane Wilson Planning & Development Director
History: Council at its Ordinary Meeting on 21 November 2017 resolved:
“That the proposal be deferred until an onsite meeting can be held in the New Year.”
Further to that resolution a site inspection/meeting was arranged and conducted at 4pm 23 January 2018, with Councillors Sajowitz, Kellam, Lyon, McCarthy, Capel, McKechnie, Cameron Hill (proponent), David Walker (Geolyse) and Shane Wilson Planning & Development Director present for the inspection/meeting.
The unchanged report is now referred back to Council for consideration.
Summary: Council is been in receipt of a Planning Proposal from ‘Geolyse’ for an amendment to the Oberon Local Environmental Plan 2013. The Planning Proposal has been submitted to Oberon Council on behalf of Belvoir Hill Pastoral Company Pty Ltd in May 2017. The subject site is land located at 2519 O’Connell Road, O’Connell which is to the south of the township of O’Connell and 18km south-east of Bathurst. The Planning proposal is for a rezoning of the subject site from RU1 Primary Production Zone to R5 Large Lot Residential Zone with a 10ha minimum lot size. This rezoning would facilitate a potential 17-lot subdivision on the subject site.
Oberon Council officer’s assessed the planning proposal in August 2017 and identified the following reasons on which not to recommend support to the planning proposal at that time:
- Does not accord with the Oberon Land Use Strategy criteria in identifying future rural lifestyle living sites as O’Connell is not a primary or secondary service centre. - The additional lot supply in O’Connell may generate disproportionate demands for services and infrastructure in the village of O’Connell which is currently not zoned to allow commercial, retail or community facilities. - There has been no evidence provided within the Planning Proposal that there is less than 10 years supply of rural lifestyle living sites and/or a lack of supply of rural lifestyle living sites in O’Connell or Oberon Council. - In accordance with Section 117 Direction 1.2 Rural Lands, there is no compelling reason that this agricultural land should be rezoned to lifestyle living lots. - Is not supported by SEPP (Rural Lands) 2008, as the Planning Proposal has failed to provide evidence that additional R5 zoned land would contribute to the social and economic welfare of the O’Connell community.
Despite not supporting the planning proposal the Council officer’s assessment of August 2017 stated:
“To a certain extent there is some planning merit to the Planning Proposal as the subject site is located between two areas of R5 zoned land and in the future there may be some land use conflict between the R5 and the subject sites RU1 zoning. The land also has manageable constraints, is close to the centre of O’Connell and is potentially the most suitable RU1 land in the O’Connell surrounds suited for large lot living.”
Initial advice on the draft report was provided to ‘Geolyse’ for their consideration.
56 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
‘Geolyse’ have since responded to the Council officer’s recommendation with ‘Further Information’ dated 5 October 2017, which is affirmation of the strategic merit of the planning proposal. This report has subsequently been prepared in response to the Geolyse ‘Further Information’.
Recommendation:
That: 1. Council do not support the Planning Proposal or the request for gateway determination for the following reasons. o The additional rural residential land in O’Connell will result in a disproportionate demand for services and infrastructure in O’Connell which is currently not zoned to allow commercial or retail uses. o The additional rural residential land in O’Connell is not supporting the town of Oberon which is nominated as the primary service centre and has significant amounts of R5 land available in conjunction with existing services and/or the potential to provide these services. o This planning proposal is inconsistent with the Rural Planning Principles identified in the State Environmental Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008 specifically: . The promotion and protection of opportunities for current and potential productive and sustainable economic activities in rural areas. . Recognition of the significance of rural land uses to the State and rural communities, including the social and economic benefits of rural land use and development, . The provision of opportunities for rural lifestyle, settlement and housing that contribute to the social and economic welfare of rural communities,
2. Council authorise the General Manager to inform the proponent that Oberon Council do not support the planning proposal.
3. A division be called in accordance with Section 375A of The Local Government Act 1993.
Comment:
The proponent has stated in their further information letter that additional rural residential living in O’Connell is generally consistent with eight of the nine criteria identified in the Oberon Land Use Strategy (LUS). The one criteria that Council officer’s identified as not being compliant was that new rural residential development should have reasonable proximity to one of the LGA’s primary or secondary service centers, and that O’Connell is not identified as a primary or secondary service centre. The proponent has stated that the term primary or secondary service centre is not defined in the LUS however in early iterations of the LUS, Oberon is nominated as the primary service centre and Black Springs and Burraga are the secondary service centers. Essentially a secondary service centre was defined as being between 30-500 households and providing services and a focus for a district sub-catchment. An explanation in the Oberon Land Use Strategy (September 2010, p173) was that O’Connell was not included in the secondary service centers because it considered that any substantial re-development (in O’Connell) will detract from the creation of a critical mass for the higher order villages and towns. Although O’Connell still has a lack of services for a district sub-catchment in 2017, it definitely has greater than 30 households and it could be argued that it is now a secondary centre. The proponent is correct when it stated in their further information, that O’Connell not being a
57 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
secondary centre did not prevent Council from rezoning land directly around the O’Connell village via the adoption of the LUS in 2013. In isolation an additional 17 lots as a result of this planning proposal and subdivision seems relatively docile however the cumulative impact of the combined R5 zoned land in O’Connell is likely to impact on the growth of the primary service centre of Oberon. Irrespective of whether O’Connell is a secondary service centre, the Council officer’s report stated the additional lot supply in O’Connell may generate disproportionate demands for services and infrastructure in the village of O’Connell which is currently not zoned to allow commercial, retail or community facilities.
The proponent has tried to argue that the current RU1 zoning is satisfactory with various uses permitted with consent including a Highway Service Centre. The O’Connell Road is not a highway so this is a moot point. The prohibition of commercial type services in the RU1 zoning of O’Connell is a limitation for the expansion of O’Connell. As population grows there will be a demand for Council to provide services to support the community and to facilitate uses that are currently prohibited. This lack of a village or local centre zone has been recently identified in the community and as the town grows and social disadvantage arises due to the inaccessibility to basic services, Council may be forced to respond accordingly.
The Council officer’s assessment requested a land analysis and stated that crucial parts of the Oberon Land Residential Land Analysis prepared by WRI were incorrect, particularly the claim that there had been an 85.5% increase in population in O’Connell between 2006 and 2011. This error has not been acknowledged by the proponent in the further information and they state that O’Connell has had a 6% growth year on year in the 10 year period 2006-2016.
The proponent’s further information provided a supply analysis of the existing R5 land in O’Connell and came to the conclusion that there is an estimated supply of 65 R5 zoned lots in O’Connell (18 vacant but subdivided and 47 potential lots). Although the assumptions that the Council uses is different, Council officers have determined (as of October 2017) that there are 17 vacant but subdivided lots and 49 potential R5 lots available in O’Connell. The supply of R5 lots in O’Connell is therefore estimated to be 65-66 lots.
In terms of demand the proponent states that with a consistent 6% growth in O’Connell, this represents 3.25 years supply or with a moderate growth rate of 2.5% this is 13 years supply of R5 land available in O’Connell. Council’s own research into demand shows that there have been 14 approved dwellings in the O’Connell R5 zone over the past 3 years. If this trend is to continue then there is 13 years supply of R5 land left in O’Connell. Therefore the proponents moderate demand growth reveals similar findings to Council.
The proponent considers this to be substantial evidence to rezone the subject land and states:
Additionally, the form of lifestyle allotments offered around the O’Connell village are very specific in terms of size and provision of on-site services. Other lifestyle allotment opportunities within the Oberon LGA are smaller, with minimum lot sizes on offer of 2 hectares and 5 hectares. The larger lot sizes offered around O’Connell are not offered elsewhere in the LGA and it is understood that it is this form of uniqueness, together with the character of the locality that contributes to their appeal.
Because of this apparent unique offering, the proponent avoids an in-depth discussion of the availability of R5 land in the entire Oberon Local Government area. Analysis of the Oberon town area shows in excess of 550ha of R5 zoned land that has yet to be subdivided. With a reduction of land for infrastructure provision (for e.g. roads) and with the land having a mixture of 2 to 5ha minimum lot sizes, there is in excess of 200 lots in the Oberon R5 zoned land which is yet to be subdivided. There are also dozens of R5 zoned lots that have been subdivided but are still vacant.
58 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
The addition of R5 land was identified in the LUS as a way to prevent rural land fragmentation and as a means to attract growth to the town of Oberon. Adding to the supply of large lot living in O’Connell is not supporting the growth of the town of Oberon which has the capacity to provide the necessary services to its residents.
The Council officer’s recommendation stated that In accordance with Section 117 Direction 1.2 Rural Lands, there is no compelling reason that this agricultural land should be rezoned to lifestyle living lots. The proponent suggested that the compelling reason for the rezoning is that the land is suitable for large lot living and adheres to the criteria of the LUS. They also state that not providing R5 land could lead to pressures of land releases in other RU1 land and that the prevention of the land use conflict now (between rural residential land and primary production land) could solve the problem in the future. This shows a lack of respect and understanding of the State Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008 which is fundamentally there to protect rural land for rural and related purposes. Three of the rural planning principles of the State Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008 are: The promotion and protection of opportunities for current and potential productive and sustainable economic activities in rural areas; and Recognition of the significance of rural land uses to the State and rural communities, including the social and economic benefits of rural land use and development, The provision of opportunities for rural lifestyle, settlement and housing that contribute to the social and economic welfare of rural communities, The proponent has not provided any substantial case in favour of these inconsistencies with the State Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008. It is the view of the Council officer that the removal of 170ha of primary productive land is premature at his stage when there is no obvious need and no obvious encroachments on the owners land. There is also no tangible economic or social gain for the community and therefore it is considered that this planning proposal and subdivision would be a net loss for the O’Connell and Oberon Council at this time. Based on the assessment detailed within this report, it is recommended that Council not support the planning proposal or the request for gateway determination. The proponent then has the opportunity to request a ‘pre-gateway review’ by a Planning Panel.
Notes:
59 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
13.03 JOINT ORGANISATIONS – OBERON COUNCIL INVOLVEMENT File No: PR186-2519 Author: Gary Wallace, General Manager
Summary: The purpose of this report is to provide advice to the Minister for Local Government that Council seeks to be part of a Joint Organisation in Central NSW. The resolution is as provided by the Office of Local Government (OLG) to give effect to this decision.
The report provides background advice to this resolve and has been developed in consultation with Central NSW Councils (Centroc), a Pilot Joint Organisation, using advice from the OLG.
Recommendation:
That:
1. Oberon Council inform the Minister for Local Government (Minister) of the Council’s endorsement of the Minister recommending to the Governor the establishment of a Joint Organisation (Joint Organisation) in accordance with this resolution.
2. Council approve the inclusion of the Oberon Local Government Area in the Joint Organisation’s area.
3. That the Joint Organisation be established to cover the Council’s area and any one or more of the following council areas:
Blayney Shire Council, Cabonne Council, Cowra Shire Council, Forbes Shire Council, Lachlan Shire Council, Lithgow City Council, Oberon Council, Orange City Council, Parkes Shire Council and Weddin Shire Council.
4. That, on the expiry of a period of 28 days from the making of this resolution, the General Manager provide the Minister:
a. with a copy of this resolution including the date on which Council made this resolution, and b. inform the Minister that this resolution has not been rescinded, for the purpose of the Minister issuing a certificate under section 400P of the Act.
Comment:
ATTACHED for Councillor consideration are the following:
1. Joint Organisations – Working together for regional communities 2. Legal Advice to Centroc 3. Correspondence from the Office of Local Government
Joint Organisations (JOs) are a key component of the local government reform process and have the intention to transform the way in which the State Government and local government collaborates and sets regional priorities to support local communities. Centroc was selected as one of 5 Pilot JOs.
60 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Centroc’s entity status is currently a Section 355 Committee of Forbes Shire Council. The Centroc Board has had ongoing concerns with this structure as it unfairly burdens Forbes. The Board recognises that the JO legislation addresses this issue.
The State Government has passed legislation for the formal creation of Joint Organisations under the Local Government Amendment (Regional Joint Organisations) Bill 2017. This allows councils in regional NSW to voluntarily create Joint Organisations.
Legislation
A review of the Legislation shows the essential elements of a Joint Organisation’s operation are as follows:
Established and dissolved by Proclamation. This means that if a council wants to join or leave a JO then the JO must be recreated through Proclamation; Body Corporate and a statutory corporation under the Interpretation Act; Council must resolve to join the JO. The resolution must be in a specific format that mentions the other councils in the JO. The resolve above is that recommended by the OLG: Principal Functions: o Establish strategic regional priorities and strategies and plans for their delivery o Regional Leadership to advocate for strategic regional priorities o Identify and take up opportunities for intergovernmental co-operation. Other functions: o As directed by the members (including regulatory functions) o As directed by legislation o As delegated by the CEO of the OLG Board – Mayors only. One delegate per council unless the JO decides it wants two. Then it must be two from each council. The second delegate must be a councillor. General Managers attending meetings are not voting Board members Associate Membership – is provided for and includes Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPC) and County Councils which means that Central Tablelands Water can be an associate member. Hilltops, Upper Lachlan and other neighbouring Councils outside the Planning Boundary may seek to be associate members; Voting – equal votes per member council, no votes for associates; Chair – holds office for 2 years and can be a non-voting Chair. Where there is a non-voting chair the chair’s council nominates another representative to be the voting delegate; Executive Officer is the Public Officer; Exercise of Functions – can be by employees, agents and contractors, committees of the board, jointly with others including member councils or another JO and by a delegate of the joint organisation. A council cannot be required by a decision of the JO to delegate any of its functions to the JO; Delegations – can delegate to an EO, a Board committee or any other person or body any of the functions of the JO. The JO can sub-delegate any functions delegated to it by the CEO of OLG; The Act applies to a JO the same way as it applies to a council except for the stated exemptions. JOs are exempted from activities such as Integrated Planning &Reporting, community consultations, elections, planning, strategic planning and annual reports; Staff are employed under the State Industrial Relations system; and Regulations will be written to facilitate the work of the JO.
61 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Forming a Joint Organisation
Joint Organisations can be formed with a minimum of 2 councils and those councils must lie within a State Planning Region as shown in the map below. According to advice from the Office of Local Government, Joint Organisation boundaries should:
align with, or ‘nest’ within one of the State’s planning regions demonstrate a clear community of interest between member councils and regions not adversely impact on other councils or JOs, for example, leaving too few councils to form a JO be based around a strong regional centre or centres be of an appropriate size to partner with State, Commonwealth and other partners. 1
While the choice to join and composition of a Joint Organisation is voluntary, the NSW Government will only support the creation of Joint Organisations within existing State planning regions and in regional NSW. For Council this would mean membership within the Central West/Orana Planning Area.
1 Joint Organisation Information Pack as provided to Council by the Office of Local Government, page 5 2 https://www.olg.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/EC_joint%20organisation_2017_v07.pdf page 6
62 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
It is noteworthy that while Council can opt into the Joint Organisation, opting out is more difficult and would require Proclamation through State Parliament. Having said that, Council has been a voluntary member of Centroc and appreciated its value since its inception in the 1980s. Further, Local Government is a function of the State Government and exists at its behest – arguably the operating environment of Local Government is always within boundaries set by the State and so becoming a member of the Joint Organisation is no more constraining.
The Office of Local Government has provided advice that should Councils wish to take advantage of the Joint Organisation provisions they must do so by 28 February 2018. This is to allow for the Proclamation process and a start date of 1 July 2018. It is acknowledged that this timeframe is tight.
Discussion in the region
The Centroc Board met 23 November 2017 and gave consideration to becoming a JO. Included in its considerations was the attached legal advice. The Centroc Board subsequently resolved as follows:
1. Support in principle Joint Organisation legislation; 2. Seek an extension of time for Councils to opt in to allow for the development of the regulations; and 3. Invite the Office of Local Government to present to the region as soon as possible.
Mr. Chris Presland of the Office of Local Government made a presentation to the region on Joint Organisations to the region Tuesday 12 December 2017. Attendees at the meetings were generally positive about the opportunity to leverage becoming a member of a Joint Organisation with a boundary similar to that of Centroc. Attendees were in agreement that the Joint Organisation would offer a better structural arrangement than a Section 355 Committee of Forbes Shire Council as is current with Centroc.
Disappointment of Centroc members was expressed at the presentation Tuesday 12 December regarding the lack of clarity due to the Regulations for Joint Organisations not being developed. It is understood that the Office of Local Government will commence consultation on the Regulations in February 2018. The region has sought advice particularly with regard to any liability of the Joint Organisation being extended to member Councils. Mr Presland agreed to undertake follow-up both in this regard and in relation to enabling aggregated procurement. At the time of writing no further advice has been provided by the Office of Local Government.
Consultation regarding membership
Direction from the Office of Local Government is that full members of a Joint Organisation must fall into a regional planning area. Centroc members share a planning boundary with Orana Regional Organisations of Councils (OROC).
Advice from OROC is that there is no interest in forming a Joint Organisation with any Centroc members, rather they have State permission to include Councils in the Far West in their JO.
Centroc members agreed at the workshop Tuesday 12 December to recommend to members they proceed with JOs with the membership of the Centroc within the planning boundary. That is Bathurst Regional Council, Blayney Shire Council, Cabonne Council, Cowra Shire Council, Forbes Shire Council, Lachlan Shire Council, Lithgow City Council, Oberon Council, Orange City Council, Parkes Shire Council and Weddin Shire Council.
63 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Associate members will be at the discretion of the membership and developed as part of the Charter. The Charter will be developed subsequent to the Proclamation of the Joint Organisation and advice from the Office of Local Government is that it will be similar to the Charter developed during the Pilot period.
Financial implications
The Office of Local Government has advised that there is $3.3m available in seed funding to establish JOs across NSW.2 Also, the Office of Local Government provides advice that Councils that are members of Joint Organisations will be able to take advantage of investment opportunities that are delivered through the Joint Organisation.3 It is noteworthy that Centroc was recently successful in December 2017 in securing a 100% funded bridge assessment program with other grant applications aggregating member Council priority in the pipeline.
Effecting becoming a member of a Joint Organisation
The Office of Local Government has provided Council with guidance regarding becoming a member of a Joint Organisation. This includes the resolve as printed above and filling in an online form. The online form included seeking advice regarding a name and advice on any non-financial support required to ensure the Joint Organisation proposal is successful.
Name
The preferred name for the Joint Organisation of Councils is suggested as “Central NSW Councils Joint Organisation.” This name builds on the location of the region in Central NSW, its history as a Regional Organisation of Councils and emphasizes its function as a collaboration of Councils.
Non-financial support required to ensure the Joint Organisation proposal is successful
The following non-financial support would be useful in ensuring the success of Joint Organisations:
Optimising aggregated procurement for Joint Organisations; Dedicated resource in the Office Of Local Government for Joint Organisations including collaboration between Joint Organisations; Support for a JO Chairs Group with dedicated access to Ministers and senior bureaucrats; Giving consideration to the role of JOs in the funding and strategic framework; Standardised tools for prioritisation, communication, etc.; and Minimising the devolution of State agency roles to the JO.
Conclusion
Council has the option to evolve its existing Centroc membership into a membership of a Joint Organisation of Councils in Central NSW. This will overcome the ongoing issue of the entity status of Centroc as a Section 355 Committee of Forbes Shire Council.
3 http://www.olg.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/Joint%20Organisation%20FAQs_0.pdf 4 http://www.olg.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/Joint%20Organisation%20FAQs_0.pdf page 5
64 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
13.04 REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE – OBERON TIGERS CHANGE ROOMS File No: Recreation & Cultural Services/Event Management/Sporting & Cultural Events/2018 Author: Gary Wallace, General Manager
Summary The Oberon Tigers Rugby League Club Inc. has written to Council requesting assistance with upgrades to the existing change rooms at the Oberon Rugby Leagues Ground.
Recommendation:
That Council investigate the costs of upgrading the change rooms at the Oberon Rugby Leagues Ground and report back to Council in March.
Comment Photos of the existing change rooms at the Oberon Rugby Leagues Ground FOLLOW.
Council is in receipt of correspondence from the Oberon Tigers Rugby Leagues Club indicating that they have met with NSW Country Rugby League who has indicated that the current state of the existing change rooms is not to Group 10 standard.
As a result the Oberon Tigers Rugby Leagues Club (the Club) has indicated in correspondence that the following items are required to be upgraded. They include:
Home Team Shed Floor surface repair - level over cracks and industrial paving paint for hygiene Upgrade lighting - extra 4’ batten lights Replace partitions in showers with water-proof material Paint walls and ceiling (including toilets) (approx. 80 square metres floor area) Replace benches and clothes hooks around parameter of dressing room Create access through to storage room and extra toilets (through existing wall)
Away Team Shed Floor surface repair - level over cracks and industrial paving paint for hygiene Replace old benches and clothes hooks Repaint ceiling Render, level and paint walls Extra lighting (4 x 4’ double battens)
Referees Room Floor surface repair - level over cracks and industrial paving paint for hygiene Repaint walls and ceiling Replace bench seating & clothes hooks
Further, the Club has indicated that should Council purchase the required materials the Club will be willing to undertake the repairs.
The current lease for the Oberon Leagues Ground change rooms indicates that the lessee (the Club) is responsible for the maintenance of the fixtures and fittings associated with the change rooms. The lessor (Council) would be responsible for the other maintenance requirements.
65 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Given the request it is considered that Council should request a costing for the proposed materials to upgrade the facility from the Technical Services Director in line with the request made and facilitate what monetary contribution would be required by Council to facilitate this request.
66 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
67 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
68 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
69 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
70 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
71 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
72 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
13.05 REQUESTS FOR ASSISTANCE - SENIORS WEEK, INTERNATIONAL WOMENS DAY & OTHR File No: Recreation & Cultural Services/Event Management/Sporting & Cultural Events/2018 Author: Gary Wallace, General Manager
Summary A number of requests have been provided to Council requesting assistance with undertaking community events in the near future. This report seeks to identify funding opportunities for these events.
Recommendation:
That:
1. Council provides $600 to the Burraga Agricultural Bureau to assist in running a Seniors Week Lunch at the Burraga Recreational and Sports Club sourced from general revenue. 2. Council provides a budget of $600 to support International Women’s Day to be sourced from General Revenue 3. Council provide in kind assistance to Oberon Tarana Heritage Railway to supply and return the transportation of a steam traction engine for the OTHR Heritage Transport Rally 2018 to the capped value of $1,000. 4. Council allow the use of its unformed parking area on the corner of Albion and North Streets be used to facilitate the display of vehicles and machinery for the Heritage Transport Rally in 2018 upon the appropriate undertaking of a risk assessment for the event in consultation with Councils Work, Health, Safety and Risk Officer.
Comment FOLLOWING are copies of correspondence from the Oberon Tarana Heritage Railway Inc. (OTHR) and the Burraga Agricultural Bureau seeking support for upcoming events.
BURRAGA AGRICULTURAL BUREAU (BAB)
Council is in receipt of correspondence from BAB seeking support from Oberon Council to conduct a Seniors Week lunch on 8 March 2018. Traditionally Council has supported this activity through dollar for dollar grant funding however this year no funding opportunities were provided. As a result (as with 2017) the BAB propose to host a senior’s lunch and have sought a contribution from Council to assist in running the event. In 2017 Council provided a sum of $600 to assist with running the lunch and the BAB have kindly sought this assistance again.
This event has been previously well received in the Burraga community with many people from the community attending. It is considered that Council should continue to support this initiative and provide the BAB a $600 donation to assist with hosting the 2018 event.
INTERNATIONAL WOMENS DAY (IWD)
International Women's Day (March 8) is a global day celebrating the social, economic, cultural and political achievements of women. The day also marks a call to action for accelerating gender parity. International Women's Day (IWD) has occurred for well over a century, with the first March 8 IWD gathering supported by over a million people in Austria, Denmark, Germany and Switzerland.
73 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Prior to this the Socialist Party of America, United Kingdom's Suffragists and Suffragettes, and further groups campaigned for women equality.
Previously IWD has been supported through grant funding from the NSW State Government. Over the last few years this funding has not eventuated. This is now the case in 2018. As a result, and in order to facilitate ongoing recognition of IWD it is recommended that a donation of $600 be allocated to IWD from general revenue to support the ongoing event. Previously these events have been well supported by the community and as a result it is considered that the recommendation should be supported again.
HERITAGE TRANSPORT RALLY
Council is in receipt of correspondence from the Oberon Tarana Heritage Railway Inc. (OTHR) seeking assistance from Council for an event they are working on developing in lieu of The Steam Fest which was previously undertaken on a yearly basis. This event known as the Heritage Transport Rally (to be undertaken in conjunction with the Oberon Heritage and Collectors Club) (OHCC) propose to host an event that will consist of showing steam traction engines and heritage vehicle and machinery to be held at the Oberon Railway Station.
In the correspondence OTHR are seeking in-kind assistance from Council to transport a steam traction engine from Mount Victoria to Oberon and return. It is expected that such an in kind cost would be in the vicinity of $1,000.
Additionally, the event organiser’s have asked that as part of the event that Council also allow the parking area on the corner of North and Albion Streets to be used to showcase some of the items. Whilst it is considered that this could be considered by Council, a risk assessment will need to be provided by the organisers mitigating any risk to Council should endorsement follow.
It is considered that all proposals identified in this report be endorsed by Council.
Notes:
74 | P a g e
Page 75 > On 5 Feb 2018, at 7:51 am, CH Lamburn
Page 76 Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
13.06 PROPOSAL - BEN CHIFLEY CATCHMENT STEERING COMMITTEE File No: Environmental Management/Meetings/Catchment Management Authority Author: Gary Wallace, General Manager
Summary This report outlines additional information sought by Oberon Council on behalf of the Ben Chifley Catchment Steering Committee (BCCSC) and requests Council support in programs being undertaken by the Committee
Recommendation:
That:
1. Oberon Council investigate the proposal of Ben Chifley Catchment Steering Committee (BCCSC) for undertaking works to care for Oberon Waterways including the activities outlined in the letter dated 13 February 2018.
2. the General Manager, or his delegate undertake inspections with the BCCSC Coordinator to identify areas of concern and report back to Council a proposed means of funding identified works within the Oberon Local Government Area and the proposed budget
Comment FOLLOWING is correspondence received from the Ben Chifley Catchment Steering Committee Inc. (BCCSC) outlining the current proposal and additional information about the Committee.
The BCCSC was established in the mid 1990s, to “Care for our Waterways” by a number of land care groups within the Ben Chifley Dam Catchment. Bathurst Regional Council (BRC) undertook to support the group and has continued to support the group financially. The group undertakes activities that improve the quality of water in the waterways in the catchment area.
There are a number of waterways originating in the Oberon Council Local Government Area that ends up in Ben Chifley Dam.
Significant works to date have been undertaken within Oberon Council and on Oberon Roads including:
1. willow removal, 2. tree lotting to prevent erosion and soil degradation and 3. stock crossings to remove a. animal faeces from waterways b. turbidity caused by stock crossing streams.
Recent spraying has occurred on Campbell’s River Rd, Beaconsfield Road, Swallows Nest Rd and Burraga Rd for St John’s Wart, Blackberry and Briar. Tussock spraying on Todd’s Rd has also been completed. This season 90km of road in Bathurst and Oberon Council areas has been completed for $3003.00 under BCCSC control.
BCCSC believes it can offer its services to Oberon Council to undertake beneficial works to benefit Oberon waterways in general including:
77 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
a. willow removal along roadsides and in consenting landholders properties b. fencing off areas and planting trees to prevent silting up of waterways and erosion of rural land c. Other works to prevent land degradation and harm to Oberon Waterways
BCCSC is able to obtain considerable cost savings through bulking work together such as excavator hire for a number of jobs and the bulk purchase of fencing.
BCCSC additionally has a dedicated team for cutting willows and poisoning the stumps and small willows.
It is requested that Oberon Council consider tasking BCCSC to specifically to undertake projects or provide a general yearly grant for BCCSC to undertake work as agreed. In this regard willow removal along Oberon Roads has previously been discussed by both Council and BCCSC.
The request made by BCCSC has the ability to increase Councils ability to eradicate weeds within the Catchment Area by using experts to guide the process. It is considered that Council should engage with the BCCSC and outline projects that would be of benefit to both organisations. Upon investigation a further report can be tabled with Council outlining the proposals and likely costs to undertake these initiatives.
Notes:
78 | P a g e
“Caring for our Waterways” en B hifley Tim Cox c Catchment Co-ordinator atchment PO Box 2088 c teering Bathurst NSW 2795 s Ph (02) 63371133 ABN 68 150 740 013 Mob. 0427375505 committee E-Mail [email protected]
13th February 2018
Mr Gary Wallace
General Manager
Oberon Council.
Dear Gary,
Ben Chifley Catchment Steering Committee Inc.
The Ben Chifley Catchment Steering Committee Inc. was established in the mid 1990s, to “Care for our Waterways” by a number of land care groups within the Ben Chifley Dam Catchment. Bathurst Regional Council (BRC) undertook to support the group and has continued to support the group financially. The group undertakes activities that improve the quality of water in the waterways in the Catchment area. You will appreciate that there are a number of waterways originating in the Oberon Council area that end up in Ben Chifley dam. Hence significant works to date have been funded by Bathurst Regional Council on ratepayers land in Oberon Council and on Oberon Roads including:
a) willow removal, b) tree lotting to prevent erosion and soil degradation and c) stock crossings to remove 1) animal faeces from waterways 2) turbidity caused by stock crossing streams.
Recent spraying has occurred on Campbell’s River Rd, Beaconsfield Road, Swallows Nest Rd and Burraga Rd for St John’s Wart, Blackberry and Briar. Tussock spraying on Todds Rd has also been done. This season 90 KM of road in Bathurst and Oberon Council areas has been done for $3003.00.
BCCSC believes it can offer its services to Oberon Council to undertake beneficial works to benefit Oberon waterways general including:
a) willow removal along roadsides and in consenting landholders properties
1
Page 79 b) fencing off areas and planting trees to prevent silting up of waterways and erosion of rural land c) Other works to prevent land degradation and harm to Oberon Waterways
BCCSC is able to obtain considerable cost savings by bulking work together such as excavator hire for a number of jobs and the bulk purchase of fencing. We also have a dedicated team for Cutting willows and poisoning the stumps and small willows. BCCSC knows these rates it obtains are highly competitive. In undertaking the work we obtain direct quotes and I project manage at a rate of $65.00 per hour. In the overall scheme of things this is relatively minor cost. For instance for a 5 day willow removal project the excavator hire including operator is approximately $5,600.00, the chainsaw work and spraying/painting the stumps and suckers with Glyphosate 360 costs about $1,800.00 and my time cost is $590.00. No on cost or admin is charged on top of the contractor pricing. Similarly where landholders undertake tree and bush establishment to prevent soil run off/erosion into the waterways a bulk purchase of trees and fencing occurs. Trees are mostly purchased from Oberon Plateau Farm Trees on the Mozart Rd.
Oberon Council can task BCCSC specifically to undertake projects or it can provide a general yearly grant for BCCSC to undertake work as agreed. For instance Willow removal along Oberon Roads has been discussed. Originally it was contemplated that roads within Oberon Council area would be inspected jointly by Jill O’Grady as the Upper Macquarie County Council Oberon area Weeds Officer and me. As you are aware Jill has left the Upper Macquarie County Council so Oberon may like to nominate another person to conduct joint inspections with me if Council resolves to move ahead on this proposal.
I am available to meet with you, Council staff and Councillors to explain in greater detail what BCCSC does and the services it can provide to Oberon and its landholders.
Yours Sincerely,
Tim Cox.
BCCSC Co coordinator.
2
Page 80 Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
13.07 DOG ROCKS ROAD – COMPULSORY ACQUSITION OF FORESTRY CORPORATION NSW LAND File No: Roads/Maintenance/Roads Author: Works & Engineering Director, Chris Schumacher
Summary This report is to further the Compulsory Acquisition process requirements seeking Ministerial approval from the Minister for Lands for the transfer of 1.055Ha of land referenced as Lot 101 DP 1235365, Forestry Corporation NSW to Oberon Councils as part of the unexpected Naturally Occurring Asbestos issue at Dog Rocks Road, January 2016.
Recommendation
That:
1. Council authorise the compulsory acquisition of the land shown within the attached Deposited Plan (DP 1235365) Lot 101 1.055Ha to be purchased and consolidate into the existing Dog Rocks Road as additional Road Reserve.
2. Council authorise an application to be made to the Minister for the Compulsory Acquisition of the land.
3. Council agree to the terms and conditions of the ‘Memorandum of Understanding’ between the Forestry Corporation of New South Wales and Oberon Council dated 23 December 2016.
4. That the General Manager be duly authorised to execute legal documents on Councils behalf for the purchase and transfer of this compulsory land acquisition.
5. Oberon Council pay Forestry Corporation NSW the amount of $2,900.00 for the transfer of land to Oberon Council, in accordance with the licenced valuation completed by Opteon 22 March 2017.
Comment
ATTACHED is a diagram outlining the location of the compulsory land acquisition and a copy of the independent valuation completed for the parcel of land.
In January 2016, Council were accidently made aware of the discovery of Naturally Occurring asbestos on a 2.9km road project south east of Rockley.
Since the announcement and discovery of unexpected Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA) at Dog Rocks Road, staff worked closely with the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) and Safe Work NSW in relation to seeking an amicable solution to progressing the safe clean up of the NOA materials. During this period a number of awareness training sessions with staff were undertaken respect to due diligence in trying to deal with the asbestos whilst also providing the necessary awareness training for our employees.
During the process of trying to limit exposure to Council and excessive cost burdens with the expense to clean up this material, staff sought to acquire 1.055Ha of land from Forestry Corporation NSW in an effort to bury and contain the NOA material within the new land being sort from Forestry Corporation NSW.
81 | P a g e
Oberon Council - Agenda and Business Papers – Ordinary Meeting – 20 February 2018
Agreement was gained and approval provided by the Environment Protection authority after a lengthy discussion to proceed burying the material at the nearby site would limit risk and exposure to the public, rather then being required to transfer to the NOA to the only licenced waste Facility at Lowes Mount Road Oberon.
In an effort to facilitate the works immediately discussions with Forestry Corporation seen the development of a ‘Memorandum of Understanding’ (MOU), to fast track safest way of engaging the Contractor clean-up to commence, whilst also complying with the EPA Notice of Clean-up conditions imposed.
Subject to the MOU with Forestry Corporation, Council engaged the services of licenced land valuer, Opteon Group to provide a report on the net value of the land, copy of the Opteon report as attachment to this report.
As advised by Council Legal representatives McIntosh McPhillamy & Co, Council is required to formally adopt the resolution recommendations (Items 1 through 4) to allow the submission of the application to the Minister for Lands seeking formal concurrence for the land acquisition matter to proceed.
Notes:
82 | P a g e
Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90
28 March 2017
Chris Schumacher Oberon Council 137-139 Oberon Street OBERON NSW 2787
Dear Chris, Re: Proposed Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road, Dog Rocks, New South Wales
In accordance with agreed instructions please find attached a copy of our valuation report for the property for prepurchase advice purposes.
Please note this format does not meet Practice Standards for valuations for mortgage/finance purposes and is specifically not suitable for this purpose.
Thank you for engaging Opteon Property Group (OPG) to provide you with professional, independent property advice. OPG is Australia’s largest national provider of market-leading valuation and property advice. We work closely with our clients to deliver innovative property solutions.
Whether for residential, commercial, industrial, retail, hospitality, or rural property or agribusiness, plant and equipment, quantity surveying or tax depreciation specialised property advice, OPG will help to make value visible anywhere in Australia.
We would appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you again. Please do not hesitate to contact us for further information or advice.
Kind regards,
Phillip Humphreys Valuer AAPI CPV API No: 69098
Opteon Property Group Opteon (Central West NSW) Pty Ltd ABN 50 606 224 677 293 Stewart Street, Bathurst NSW 2795 P (02) 6331 7805 E [email protected] F (02) 6362 5116 W www.opg.net
VALUE MADE VISIBLE Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Page 91
Valuation Report
Proposed Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road Dog Rocks, New South Wales 2795 File Ref: 7803034
Page 92
VALUATION REPORT
Proposed Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road Dog Rocks, New South Wales 2795 Prepared For Oberon Council Report Purpose Prepurchase advice purposes Valuation Date 22 March 2017 Our Reference 7803034 Client Reference Purchase Order: 50347
Opteon Property Group Opteon (Central West NSW) Pty Ltd ABN 50 606 224 677 293 Stewart Street, Bathurst NSW 2795 P (02) 6331 7805 E [email protected] F (02) 6362 5116 W www.opg.net
VALUE MADE VISIBLE Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Page 93 Proposed Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road Dog Rocks, NSW 2795 Our Reference: 7803034 1.0 Valuation Summary 1.1 Instructions Instructing Party Mr. Chris Schumacher, Engineering and Works Director, Oberon Council Client / Authorised Party Oberon Council Client Reference Purchase Order: 50347 Valuation Purpose Prepurchase advice purposes - Please note, this report does not meet Practice Standards for valuations for mortgage/finance purposes and is specifically not suitable for this purpose.
1.2 Property Details Property Address Proposed Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road, Dog Rocks, New South Wales 2795 Property Description The land subject to this valuation comprises a proposed vacant irregular shaped parcel of land with a total land area of 1.055 ha. The land currently forms part of the Dog Rocks State Forest. Title Reference Proposed Lot 101 of Lot 171 Deposited Plan 757054 Tenure Type Freehold Encumbrances None disclosed or evident. Please notify valuer if search reveals otherwise Zoning RU3 (Forestry)
1.3 Assumptions and Recommendations
Key Assumptions The instructions and information supplied contain a full disclosure of all information that is relevant; Our valuation has been prepared on the basis that the proposed lot does not have building permission Our valuation assumes the property can be utilised for alternative agricultural uses apart from forestry uses. Recommended Documents None recommended to Sight
Opteon Property Group | VALUE MADE VISIBLE Page 4 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Page 94 Proposed Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road Dog Rocks, NSW 2795 Our Reference: 7803034
1.4 Valuation Details Market Value As If $2,900 (Two Thousand, Nine Hundred Dollars) Complete
Interest Valued Fee simple vacant possession Date of Inspection 22 March 2017 Date of Valuation 22 March 2017 Date Issued 28 March 2017 Currency of Valuation 90 days from the date of valuation, or such earlier date if you become aware of any factors that have any effect on the valuation. Pecuniary Interest We confirm that the valuer does not have any pecuniary interest that would conflict with the proper valuation of the property.
Signatories
Phillip Humphreys Valuer AAPI CPV API No: 69098 Inspecting Valuer
Important This Executive Summary must be read in conjunction with the remainder of this report. The Executive Summary is only a synopsis designed to provide a brief overview and must not be acted upon in isolation to the contents of the valuation report.
Third Party Disclaimer This report has been prepared for the private and confidential use of our client, Oberon Council for the specified purpose. It should not be reproduced in whole or part without the express written authority of Opteon (Central West NSW) Pty Ltd or relied upon by any other party for any purpose and the valuer shall not have any liability to any party who does so. Our warning is registered here, that any party, other than those specifically named in this paragraph should obtain their own valuation before acting in any way in respect of the subject property.
Digital Copies of Reports Where a report has been provided in digital copy and has not been received directly via our firm, the report contents, especially the valuations and critical assumptions, should be verified by contacting the issuing office to ensure the contents are bona fide. In particular if the reader of this report has suspicions that the report appears to be tampered or altered then we recommend the reader contact the issuing office.
Reliance on Whole Report This valuation should be read in its entirety, inclusive of any summary and annexures. The valuer and valuation firm does not accept any responsibility where part of this report has been relied upon without reference to the full context of the valuation report.
Opteon Property Group | VALUE MADE VISIBLE Page 5 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Page 95 Proposed Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road Dog Rocks, NSW 2795 Our Reference: 7803034
2.0 Location The subject property is situated on the south western side of Dog Rocks Road within the rural locality of Dog Rocks. The Bathurst Central Business District is about 48 kilometres to the north whilst the Oberon Town Centre is about 41 kilometres to the east.
The subject property is located in a well-established rural district comprising predominantly rural properties of varying sizes and the Dog Rocks State Forest. Location Map
3.0 Planning Local Government Area Oberon Council Planning Scheme Oberon LEP 2013 Current Zoning RU3 (Forestry) Existing Use Rural Zoning Effect Zoning is restrictive with limited permitted uses. Heritage Issues Not applicable
Opteon Property Group | VALUE MADE VISIBLE Page 6 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Page 96 Proposed Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road Dog Rocks, NSW 2795 Our Reference: 7803034 4.0 Site Site Area Approximately 1.0550 ha Topography Irregular shaped inside allotment that is generally level throughout with a slight slope down to the rear. Access The subject is located on the south western side of the road, having good sealed road access with open drains. Identification Plan of Subdivision
4.1 Services Services The property is not currently connected to services.
5.0 Improvements The land subject to this valuation is vacant and devoid of significant improvements.
6.0 Photography
General view of land General view of land
7.0 Environmental Issues Environmental Issues None apparent.
8.0 General Comments We have been instructed to assess the market value of the proposed 1.055 ha site (Proposed Lot 101) which currently forms part of the Dog Rocks State Forest for proposed purchase purposes.
The valuation assessment has been prepared under instruction from Mr. Chris Schumacher, Engineering and Works Director, Oberon Council.
Our valuation assumes the issue of clear and unencumbered title for the proposed lot as detailed in the provided plan of subdivision which is attached to the rear of this report.
Opteon Property Group | VALUE MADE VISIBLE Page 7 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Page 97 Proposed Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road Dog Rocks, NSW 2795 Our Reference: 7803034 9.0 Market Evidence
9.1 Sales Evidence In forming our opinion of value we have had regard to various sales transactions, a selection of which are detailed below. Address Sale Date Sale Price
70 Connection Road, Isabella, New South Wales 10-Jun-16 $420,000
Brief Description The property comprises an average quality, circa 1970 built, detached single storey dwelling, of vinyl clad construction, with a corrugated galvanised iron roof. Accommodation comprises 3 bedrooms, 1 bathroom, entry/foyer, hallway, kitchen, lounge, dining, family room, study/bedroom, laundry, patio, porch and detached garage/carport for 3 vehicles. Ancillary items include clothes line, rain water tanks, colorbond shed, older style shed, established gardens, full boundary fencing, gravel driveway and concrete paving. Site area 247.630 ha. Sale analyses to $1,131/ha excluding structures.
Comparison to Subject On balance, considered inferior to the subject property on a $/ha basis.
3521 Arkstone Road, Burraga, New South Wales 27-Jun-16 $286,000
Brief Description The property comprises a circa 1990 built, detached single storey dwelling, of timber construction, with a timber roof. Accommodation comprises 4 bedrooms, 1 bathroom, entry, hallway, kitchen/meals/living, verandah, pergola, separate toilet and off street parking. Ancillary items include garden shed, solar panels, clothes line, rain water tanks and full boundary fencing. Site area 53.31 ha. Sale analyses to $3,751/ha excluding structures.
Comparison to Subject On balance, considered superior to the subject property on a $/ha basis.
Aliwal, Gilmandyke Road, Gilmandyke, New South Wales 22-Sep-15 $1,900,000
Brief Description The property comprises grazing property with a total land area of approximately 590.70 ha. Improvements on the property include two dwellings, shearing shed, machinery and hay shed. Sale analyses to $2,738/ha excluding structures.
Comparison to Subject On balance, considered comparable to the subject property on a $/ha basis.
10.0 Valuation Methodology Methodology Comment The most appropriate method of valuation for a property of this nature is direct market comparison whereby the subject property is compared with sales of comparable properties and adjustments made for points of difference.
Opteon Property Group | VALUE MADE VISIBLE Page 8 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Page 98 Proposed Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road Dog Rocks, NSW 2795 Our Reference: 7803034 11.0 Valuation 11.1 Market Value - As If Complete Market Value $2,900 (Two Thousand, Nine Hundred dollars)
Interest Valued Fee simple vacant possession Date of Inspection 22 March 2017 Date of Valuation 22 March 2017 Date Issued 28 March 2017
Signatories
Phillip Humphreys Valuer AAPI CPV API No: 69098 Inspecting Valuer
Important This valuation is subject to the definitions, qualifications and disclaimers and other comments contained within this report.
Opteon Property Group | VALUE MADE VISIBLE Page 9 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Page 99 Proposed Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road Dog Rocks, NSW 2795 Our Reference: 7803034 12.0 Assumptions, Conditions and Limitations Condition/Structural This report is not a condition or structural survey and no advice is given in any way relating to condition or Disclaimer structural matters. Any opinion given as to the condition of the structure or improvements on the property is not given in the capacity as an expert. A condition or structural report on the building and/or its plant and equipment has not been sighted, and nor have we inspected unexposed or inaccessible portions of the premises. Therefore we cannot comment on the structural integrity, any defects, rot or infestation (or damage from pest infestation) of the improvements , any use of asbestos or other materials now considered hazardous or areas of non-compliance with the Building Code of Australia, other than matters which are obvious and which are noted within this report. This valuation assumes the building is structurally sound; that building services are adequate and appropriately maintained; the building complies with applicable Council, building, fire, health and/or safety regulations, laws, rules, licences, permits, rulings and/or bylaws; and is free of asbestos or other defects, unless specified otherwise. Should an expert’s report establish that there are any defects of this kind then we reserve the right to review this valuation.
Digital Copies of Reports Where a report has been provided in digital copy and has not been received directly via our firm, the report contents, especially the valuations and critical assumptions, should be verified by contacting the issuing office to ensure the contents are bona fide. In particular if the reader of this report has suspicions that the report appears to be tampered or altered then we recommend the reader contact the issuing office.
Environmental Disclaimer This report is not an environmental audit and no advice is given in any way relating to environmental matters. Any comment given as to environmental factors in relation to the property are not given in the capacity as an expert. This assessment of value (unless specified otherwise) is made on the basis that the property is free of contamination or environmental issues affecting the property not made known to the valuer. In the event the property is found to contain contamination the matter should be referred to this office for comment. Given contamination issues can have a significant impact on the Market Value of the property, we reserve the right to review and if necessary vary our valuation if any contamination or other environmental hazard is found to exist.
Full Disclosure Disclaimer Whilst we have attempted to confirm the veracity of information supplied, the scope of work did not extend to verification of all information supplied or due diligence. Our valuation and report has been prepared on the assumption the instructions and information supplied has been provided in good faith, is not in any way misleading or deceptive, contains a full disclosure of all information that is relevant, and that there are no undisclosed agreements in place that affect the property. The valuer and valuation firm does not accept any responsibility or liability whatsoever in the event the valuer has been provided with insufficient, false or misleading information.
Future Value Any comments are made in relation to future values are based on general knowledge and information currently available. These comments should not be construed as a prediction of future value levels or a warranty of future performance as the property market is susceptible to potential rapid and unexpected change caused by multiple factors. Ultimately current expectations as to trends in property values may not prove to be accurate. Due to possible changes in the property market, economic conditions, occupancy status and property specific factors, we recommend the value of the property be reassessed at regular intervals.
Geotechnical Assumption We have not sighted a geotechnical engineers’ survey of the property. We are not experts in the field of civil or geotechnical engineering and we are therefore unable to comment as to the geotechnical integrity of the ground and soil conditions. It is specifically assumed that there are no adverse geotechnical conditions that compromise the utility of the property for the current or highest and best use. In the event there is found to be adverse ground conditions we recommend the matter be referred to this Company for comment.
GST Valuations of residential property are undertaken on the basis that GST is not applicable. This valuation is prepared on the assumption that the subject property does not constitute a ‘new residential premises’ as defined under ATO Ruling GSTR 2003/3. Further it is assumed that the subject property will transact as a residential property between parties not registered (and not required to be registered) for GST. The market valuation herein reflects a market transaction to which GST may not be applicable. The client should satisfy themselves of the GST position of the parties involved.
Heritage Disclaimer Our valuation has been assessed having regard to the nature of any buildings on the property and any known heritage listings. However we have not obtained formal confirmation of heritage listings beyond what is available in the public domain and identified in this report. Our valuation assumes, unless otherwise specified, that any heritage issues (including Aboriginal) do not impact on the continued and/or highest and best use of the property. If there is doubt in relation to such issues we recommend written application be made to the relevant authorities.
Inconsistencies in If there is found to be any variance, inconsistency or contradiction in any of the above assumptions then there Assumptions may be a variation in the valuation assessed.
Opteon Property Group | VALUE MADE VISIBLE Page 10 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Page 100 Proposed Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road Dog Rocks, NSW 2795 Our Reference: 7803034
Information Availability In preparing this valuation we have undertaken those investigations reasonably expected of a professional (Market Evidence) valuer having regard to normal industry practice so as to obtain the most relevant, available, comparable market evidence. Whilst we believe the market evidence information and any other information provided to be accurate, not all details can and have been formally verified. Due to privacy laws, confidentiality agreements and other circumstances beyond our control, the valuer may not have had access to: personal details of parties involved in transactions (including the relationship of the parties); information on recent transactions that are yet to become public knowledge; and copies of leases or contracts to confirm rents or prices and to ascertain whether or not rents or prices are inclusive or exclusive of GST.
Land and Building Area In the event actual surveyed areas of the property are different to the areas adopted in this valuation the Disclaimer survey should be referred to the valuer for comment on any valuation implications. We reserve the right to amend our valuation in the event that a formal survey of areas differs from those detailed in this report.
Market Change Disclaimer This valuation is current as at the Date of Valuation only. The value assessed herein may change significantly and unexpectedly over a relatively short period (including as a result of general market movements or factors specific to the particular property). We do not accept liability for losses arising from such subsequent changes in value. Without limiting the generality of the above comment, we do not assume any responsibility or accept any liability where this valuation is relied upon after the expiration of 90 days from the date of the valuation, or such earlier date if you become aware of any factors that have any effect on the valuation. We recommend the valuation be reviewed at regular intervals.
Market Value The estimated amount for which an asset or liability should exchange on the valuation date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s length transaction, after proper marketing and where the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion.
Native Title Assumption We are not experts in native title or the property rights derived there from and have not been supplied with appropriate expert advice or reports. Therefore, this valuation is made assuming there are no actual or potential native title interests affecting the value or marketability of the property.
Planning Disclaimer Town planning and zoning information was informally obtained from the relevant local and State Government authorities and is assumed to be correct. This information does not constitute a formal zoning certificate. Should the addressee require formal confirmation of planning issues then we recommend written application be made to the relevant authorities to obtain appropriate current zoning certificates.
Professional Standards Our valuation has been assessed in accordance with applicable International Valuation Applications and Technical Information Papers of the International Valuation Standards Committee and the Australian Property Institute Practice Standards and Guidance Notes.
Publication of Report The publication of the valuation or report in whole or any part, or any reference thereto, or the names and professional affiliations of the valuers is prohibited without the prior written approval of the valuer as to the form and context in which it is to appear.
Reliance on Whole Report This valuation should be read in its entirety, inclusive of any summary and annexures. The valuer and valuation firm does not accept any responsibility where part of this report has been relied upon without reference to the full context of the valuation report.
Scope of Work Undertaken The scope of work undertaken by the valuer in completing the valuation has included: Collation of information from relevant parties regarding the subject property; Undertaking our own research regarding the subject property; An inspection of the property and measurement of buildings where required; Undertaking market research in terms of values and/or costs of similar properties; Preparation of valuation calculations; and Preparation of this report.
Site Survey Disclaimer This report is not a site survey and no advice is given in any way relating to survey matters. Any comments given in relation to the property are not given in the capacity as an expert, however, are based on our inspection of the property and review of the Certificate of Title plans. Should the addressee require absolute certainty in relation to site area, dimensions or possible encroachments we recommend that a surveyor be engaged to provide appropriate advice and a survey of the property if considered necessary. In the event there are any fundamental inconsistencies between any site survey undertaken and site detail adopted in this valuation, the survey should be referred to the valuer for comment on any valuation implications (including amendment of our valuation if considered necessary).
Opteon Property Group | VALUE MADE VISIBLE Page 11 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Page 101 Proposed Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road Dog Rocks, NSW 2795 Our Reference: 7803034
Third Party Disclaimer This report has been prepared for the private and confidential use of our client, Oberon Council for the specified purpose. It should not be reproduced in whole or part; or any reference thereto; or to the valuation figures contained herein; or to the names and professional affiliation of the Valuer(s) without the express written authority of Opteon (Central West NSW) Pty Ltd or relied upon by any other party for any purpose and the valuer shall not have any liability to any party who does so. Our warning is registered here, that any party, other than those specifically named in this paragraph should obtain their own valuation before acting in any way in respect of the subject property.
Title Assumption Our valuation assumes the property would be offered for sale subject to encumbrances noted on the Title but otherwise unencumbered by mortgages, caveats, or priority notices etc which would prevent transfer of the property.
Unregistered Instruments If there are any encumbrances, encroachments, restrictions, leases or covenants which are not noted in this report, they may affect the assessment of value. If any such matters are known or discovered, we should be advised and asked as to whether they affect our assessment of value.
Opteon Property Group | VALUE MADE VISIBLE Page 12 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Page 102 Proposed, Lot 101 Dog Rocks Road Dog Rocks, NSW 2795 Our Reference: 7803034
APPENDIX 1
INSTRUCTIONS
Opteon Property Group | VALUE MADE VISIBLE
Page 103 Phillip Humphreys
From: Chris Schumacher
Hi Phil,
Speaking with Tegan this morning I have sent this email attachment for your review. Please give me a call regarding this e-mail and the attachment. I need a valuation of the area of land marked (Lot 101 – 1.055Ha) in the attached plan. I will be purchasing this land from ForestryNSW and incorporating it into the general Road Reserve of Dog Rocks Road. The parcel of land is located 18.5km from the Black Springs intersection toward Rockley, if that helps any?
Talk soon.
Regards
Chris Schumacher Works & Engineering Director 02 6329 8127 Direct 0407 214 534 Mobile [email protected] www.oberon.nsw.gov.au