DOCSLIB.ORG

Central Rail Extension Mobility Study (2014)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Central Rail Extension Mobility Study Final Report December 2014 Central Rail Extension Mobility Study Contract No. 13DH018 Final Report DECEMBER 2014 Prepared for: Prepared by: Final Report Central Rail Extension Mobility Study Table of Contents Executive Summary………..………………………………………..…………………………….……………………………….………ES-1 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY ................................................................................................................................................. 2 STUDY AREA.................................................................................................................................................................. 4 PREVIOUS RTD PLANS AND PROJECTS ................................................................................................................................ 5 Environmental Evaluation ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Streetcar Alternative .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Post-EE Issues and Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 10 CURRENT DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION ASSUMPTIONS ..................................................................................................... 13 th 38 /Blake Station and Interface with East Rail Line ........................................................................................... 13 OTHER PLANS AND PROJECTS ......................................................................................................................................... 14 City and County of Denver Studies ...................................................................................................................... 14 Blueprint Denver ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 Strategic Transportation Plan .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Northeast Downtown Neighborhoods Plan ...................................................................................................................... 15 Five Points/Welton Street Studies ....................................................................................................................... 17 Five Points Marketplace Initiative .................................................................................................................................... 17 Five Points Sustainable Main Streets Initiative Vision Plan .............................................................................................. 17 Five Points/Welton Corridor TAP Project .......................................................................................................................... 19 Five Points Welton Street Marketplace Vision Plan Implementation & Revitalization Strategy ....................................... 19 CENTRAL RAIL EXTENSION MOBILITY STUDY PURPOSE AND GOALS ........................................................................................ 21 2 Goal 1: The One-Seat Ride......................................................................................................... 23 OPERATIONAL PLANS AND RELATED ISSUES ....................................................................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 23 INITIAL ON-THE-GROUND ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 26 DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................................................................... 27 Alternative 1: Transfer to the Existing D Line ...................................................................................................... 28 Alternative 2: Use the Downtown Loop with No Infrastructure Improvements.................................................. 30 Alternative 3: Use the Downtown Loop with New Infrastructure ....................................................................... 31 th Alternative 3A: Use Existing Track on 14 Street ............................................................................................................. 34 th Alternative 3B: New Track on 14 Street in Parking Lane ................................................................................................ 36 th Alternative 3C: New Track on 14 Street on North Sidewalk ........................................................................................... 38 th Alternative 3D: Two New Tracks on North Side of 14 Street .......................................................................................... 40 th Alternative 3E: New Through Track on South Side of 14 Street (Sidewalk) .................................................................... 42 th Alternative 3F: New Through Track on South Side of 14 Street (Parking/Taxi Lane) ...................................................... 44 th Alternative 3G: New CRE Track on 15 Street .................................................................................................................. 46 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................................................... 47 Evaluation Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 48 ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS OF REMAINING ALTERNATIVES ......................................................................................................... 49 Capital Costs and Utilities ................................................................................................................................... 49 VISSIM Analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 51 Travel Times ..................................................................................................................................................................... 52 Train Waiting Times ......................................................................................................................................................... 52 Intersection Delays ........................................................................................................................................................... 53 Page | i Final Report Central Rail Extension Mobility Study Overall Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................................... 54 Urban Design Analysis ........................................................................................................................................ 55 Vehicle Type and Consists ................................................................................................................................................. 55 ADA Accessibility .............................................................................................................................................................. 56 Urban Design Concepts .................................................................................................................................................... 58 Ridership Forecasting .......................................................................................................................................... 62 CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS ...................................................................................................................................... 65 3 Goal 2: Potential Use of Low-Floor Vehicles ............................................................................... 67 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 67 WHAT IS A STREETCAR AND HOW DOES IT DIFFER FROM A TRADITIONAL LIGHT RAIL VEHICLE? ................................................... 68 MODERN STREETCARS: KEY ISSUES .................................................................................................................................. 70 Vehicle Options ................................................................................................................................................... 70 Vehicle Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 70 Vehicles Currently Available ...............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Mobility Solutions for Mandalay, Myanmar Ratul Arora Bombardier

    Mobility Solutions for Mandalay, Myanmar Ratul Arora Bombardier

    Mobility solutions for Mandalay, Myanmar Ratul Arora Bombardier Transportation PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVATE © Bombardier Inc. or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. AllInc.itssubsidiaries.or Bombardier © 1 BOMBARDIER 1 Our Profile TRANSPORTATION 2 Bombardier in Asia Pacific 3 Mandalay’s need 4 Bombardier’s product PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVATE © Bombardier Inc. or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. AllInc.itssubsidiaries.or Bombardier © 2 Overview Bombardier Transportation Bombardier Aerospace (Fiscal year ended December 31, 2014) (Fiscal year ended December 31, 2014) PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVATE . Revenues: $9.6 billion . Revenues: $10.5 billion . Order backlog1): $32.5 billion . Order backlog1): $36.6 billion © Bombardier Inc. or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. AllInc.itssubsidiaries.or Bombardier © rights reserved. AllInc.itssubsidiaries.or Bombardier © . Customers in more than 60 countries . Customers in more than 100 countries . Employees1): 39,700 . Employees1): 34,100 . Headquarters in Berlin, Germany . Headquarters in Montréal, Canada 1) As of December 31, 2014 3 3 BOMBARDIER A diversified company Breakdown by revenues* Breakdown by workforce** Transportation Transportation 48% 54% 46% 52% Aerospace Aerospace CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVATE © Bombardier Inc. or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. AllInc.itssubsidiaries.or Bombardier © Total Revenues: $20.1 billion 73,800 employees * for fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 4 ** for fiscal year at December 31, 2014 BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION Global expertise – local presence North America Europe 16% 67% 23% 66% Asia-Pacific 11% Rest of world1) 9% CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVATE 6% 2% © Bombardier Inc. or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. AllInc.itssubsidiaries.or Bombardier © Total BT revenues 2014: 9.6$B Total BT employees2): 39,700 Global Headquarters 80 production/engineering sites & service centres Present in > 60 countries In 28 countries Note: As at December 31, 2014 5 1) Rest of world includes CIS (incl.
  • Rolling Stock Orders: Who

    Rolling Stock Orders: Who

    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE HEADLINES l Toronto’s streetcar advocates fight back l UK’s Midland Metro expansion approved l Democrats propose more US light rail ROLLING STOCK ORDERS: WHO... WHAT... HOW MUCH? Ukrainian tramways under the microscope US streetcar trends: Mixed fleets: How technology Lessons from is helping change over a century 75 America’s attitude of experience to urban rail in Budapest APRIL 2012 No. 892 1937–2012 WWW. LRTA . ORG l WWW. TRAMNEWS . NET £3.80 TAUT_April12_Cover.indd 1 28/2/12 09:20:59 TAUT_April12_UITPad.indd 1 28/2/12 12:38:16 Contents The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association 128 News 132 APRIL 2012 Vol. 75 No. 892 Toronto light rail supporters fight back; Final approval for www.tramnews.net Midland Metro expansion; Obama’s budget detailed. EDITORIAL Editor: Simon Johnston 132 Rolling stock orders: Boom before bust? Tel: +44 (0)1832 281131 E-mail: [email protected] With packed order books for the big manufacturers over Eaglethorpe Barns, Warmington, Peterborough PE8 6TJ, UK. the next five years, smaller players are increasing their Associate Editor: Tony Streeter market share. Michael Taplin reports. E-mail: [email protected] 135 Ukraine’s road to Euro 2012 Worldwide Editor: Michael Taplin Flat 1, 10 Hope Road, Shanklin, Isle of Wight PO37 6EA, UK. Mike Russell reports on tramway developments and 135 E-mail: [email protected] operations in this former Soviet country. News Editor: John Symons 140 The new environment for streetcars 17 Whitmore Avenue, Werrington, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffs ST9 0LW, UK.
  • The Bulletin RAYMOND R

    The Bulletin RAYMOND R

    ERA BULLETIN — APRIL, 2016 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 59, No. 4 April, 2016 The Bulletin RAYMOND R. BERGER, 1941-2016 Published by the Electric by Eric R. Oszustowicz Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box On March 1, 2016, Raymond R. Berger corresponded regularly. In addition, the pho- 3323, New York, New York 10163-3323. passed away at age 74. He was an ERA tographic results of his travels were shared member since 1958. Ray will be missed by through countless presentations at which he us all. Ray was on the ERA’s Board of Direc- would educate attendees through meticulous For general inquiries, tors for many years and also served for a narration regarding the transit systems dis- contact us at bulletin@ time as the Chairman of its New York Divi- played. erausa.org. ERA’s website is sion when it was still operationally independ- Ray was a retired transit professional and www.erausa.org. ent. was a respected member of NYCT’s Division To state that Ray performed work for the of Car Equipment. Think of Ray the next time Editorial Staff: ERA is quite an understate- you ride an R-142 or R- Editor-in-Chief: ment. All who perform work 142A since he contributed to Bernard Linder Tri-State News and for the ERA do so on a their basic design. Commuter Rail Editor: strictly volunteer basis. Ray Ray was a religious man. Ronald Yee was an extremely busy indi- He attained secular mem- North American and World vidual with many interests, bership in the Third Order of News Editor: Alexander Ivanoff but he was always available St.
  • Prominent Mill Avenue Location for Lease

    Prominent Mill Avenue Location for Lease

    THE OPPORTUNITY OF A LIFETIME: MAIN & MAIN IN DOWNTOWN TEMPE ON TOP OF MILL AVENUE FORMER GORDON BIERSCH 420 S MILL AVE TEMPE, AZ 85281 Kevin Weller 480.425.5513 [email protected] Mary Nollenberger 480.425.5520 [email protected] Nicole Ridberg 480.425.5514 [email protected] Downtown Tempe: The 1 Downtown Tempe: The 3 Rent Comparables 5 Opportunity Development Projects Rent Comps Property Summary Tempe Street Car Rent Comps Summary Property Location Phoenix Light Rail Expansion Rent Comps MaP Regional MaP NOVUS Innovation Corridor Demographic Information 6 Daytme Signage Example Mirabella Demographic Report Exteriors Photos Marina Heights Bar & Dining Room I.D.E.A. Tempe Balcony Photos Hotel Developments Brewery Equipment Hotel Developments (Cont) Kitchen Oace Developments Second Story Floorplan Apartment Developments Recently Completed Apartments Downtown Tempe: A Place Like 2 ASU Developments & Renovations No Other The City Downtown Tempe: Meet Your 4 The Employers Neighbors The University The Restaurants The Events The Entertainers The Travelers The Retailers The Recognition FORMER GORDON BIERSCH | 420 S MILL AVE, TEMPE, AZ 85281 OFFERING MEMORANDUM 1 DOWNTOWN TEMPE: THE OPPORTUNITY 420 S Mill Ave Tempe, AZ 85281 FORMER GORDON BIERSCH | 420 S MILL AVE TEMPE, AZ 85281 SVN | Desert Commercial Advisors | Page 3 Property Summary OFFERING SUMMARY PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS Lease Rate: $33.00 SF/yr (NNN) • One of a kind location with a one of the most diverse sets of potential customers in the United States Building Size: 15,966 SF
  • Accessibility in Rail Facilities

    Accessibility in Rail Facilities

    9/7/2017 Accessibility in Rail Facilities Kenneth Shiotani Senior Staff Attorney National Disability Rights Network 820 First Street Suite 740 Washington, DC 20002 (202) 408-9514 x 126 [email protected] September 2017 1 ADA Transportation Provisions Making Transportation Accessible was a major focus of the statutory provisions of the ADA PART B - Actions Applicable to Public Transportation Provided by Public Entities Considered Discriminatory [Subtitle B] SUBPART I - Public Transportation Other Than by Aircraft or Certain Rail Operations [Part I] 42 U.S.C. § 12141 – 12150 Definitions – fixed route and demand responsive, requirements for new, used and remanufactured vehicles, complementary paratransit, requirements in new facilities and alterations of existing facilities and key stations SUBPART II - Public Transportation by Intercity and Commuter Rail [Part II] 42 U.S.C. § 12161- 12165 Detailed requirements for new, used and remanufactured rail cars for commuter and intercity service and requirements for new and altered stations and key stations 2 1 9/7/2017 What Do the DOT ADA Regulations Require? Accessible railcars • Means for wheelchair users to board • Clear path for wheelchair user in railcar • Wheelchair space • Handrails and stanchions that do create barriers for wheelchair users • Public address systems • Between-Car Barriers • Accessible restrooms if restrooms are provided for passengers in commuter cars • Additional mode-specific requirements for thresholds, steps, floor surfaces and lighting 3 What are the different ‘modes’ of passenger rail under the ADA? • Rapid Rail (defined as “Subway-type,” full length, high level boarding) 49 C.F.R. Part 38 Subpart C - NYCTA, Boston T, Chicago “L,” D.C.
  • Cincinnati's Hard-Won Modern Tram Revival

    Cincinnati's Hard-Won Modern Tram Revival

    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com NOVEMBER 2016 NO. 947 CINCINNATI’S HARD-WON MODERN TRAM REVIVAL InnoTrans: The world’s greatest railway showcase Russian cities’ major low-floor orders Stadler and Solaris join for tram bids Doha Metro tunnelling is complete ISSN 1460-8324 £4.25 Berlin Canada’s ‘Radial’ 11 Above and below the Exploring Ontario’s streets of the capital Halton County line 9 771460 832043 LRT MONITOR TheLRT MONITOR series from Mainspring is an essential reference work for anyone who operates in the world’s light and urban rail sectors. Featuring regular updates in both digital and print form, the LRT Monitor includes an overview of every established line and network as well as details of planned schemes and those under construction. POLAND POZNAŃ Tramways play an important role in one of of the main railway station. Poland’s biggest and most historic cities, with In 2012 a line opened to the east of the city, the first horse-drawn tramline opening in 1880. with an underground section containing two An overview Electrification followed in 1898. sub-surface stations and a new depot. The The network was badly damaged during World reconstruction of Kaponiera roundabout, an A high-quality War Two, resuming operations in 1947 and then important tram junction, is set for completion in of the system’s only east of the river Warta. Service returned to 2016. When finished, it will be a three-level image for ease the western side of the city in 1952 with the junction, with a PST interchange on the lower development, opening of the Marchlewski bridge (now named level.
  • Stadt-Umland-Bahnen – Beispiele Aus

    Stadt-Umland-Bahnen – Beispiele Aus

    Hartmut Topp topp.plan: Stadt.Verkehr.Moderation TU KAISERSLAUTERN imove Stadt-Umland-Bahnen: Beispiele aus Deutschland & Frankreich Informationsveranstaltung der IHK Nürnberg für Mittelfranken und des IHK-Gremiums Erlangen am 22. Februar 2016 in Erlangen ll topp.plan: Stadt .Verkehr. Moderation itopp.plan Manchester Kiel Hasselt/Maastricht Rostock Den Haag Bondy/Paris Bremen Grenoble Ausbau Nantes Montpellier Straßen-/Stadtbahn Köln/Bonn Chemnitz Kassel Zwickau StadtRegionalBahn Regiotram Stadt-Umland-Bahn Rhein- Erlangen Neckar Saarbahn tram-train Karlsruher Modell Strasbourg Neckar-Alb in Betrieb Mulhouse Salzburg geplant Basel im Ausland Kopenhagen Manchester Kiel Hasselt/Maastricht Rostock Den Haag Bondy/Paris Bremen Grenoble Ausbau Nantes Montpellier Straßen-/Stadtbahn kommen Reims im Vortrag vor Köln/Bonn Chemnitz Kassel Zwickau StadtRegionalBahn Regiotram Stadt-Umland-Bahn Rhein- Erlangen Neckar Saarbahn tram-train Karlsruher Modell Strasbourg Neckar-Alb in Betrieb Mulhouse Salzburg geplant Basel Zürich im Ausland Querschnitte Fahrgastentwicklung 663 km Netzlänge AVG, 2015 ll Institut für Mobilität & Verkehr topp.plan: Stadt .Verkehr. Moderation itopp.plan Erste Strecke 1992: Karlsruhe - Bretten 16.000 x 8 2.000 x 3 x 4,8 x 1,8 x 6,2 AVG, 2015 ll Institut für Mobilität & Verkehr topp.plan: Stadt .Verkehr. Moderation itopp.plan Tramlinien / StUB-Linien ziehen bei gleichem Linienverlauf & gleichem Fahrplantakt deutlich mehr Fahrgäste an als Buslinien . Das ist empirisch mehrfach belegt . Wir nennen das Tram- oder Schienenbonus . Bonus bis etwa 50 %, manchmal mehr . Warum ist das so? Hoher Fahrkomfort Verlässliche Reisezeit ohne Stau Hohe Sitzplatzerwartung Urbanes Image und Prestige Leichte Orientierung ll Institut für Mobilität & Verkehr topp.plan: Stadt .Verkehr. Moderation itopp.plan 1 Multimodal unterwegs 2 Städtebauliche Einbindung 2.1 Fahrwege einer StUB 2.2 Stromversorgung 2.3 Kleine & große Haltestellen 3 Baustellenmanagement 4 Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung ll Institut für Mobilität & Verkehr topp.plan: Stadt .Verkehr.
  • Alternatives Analysis for High Capacity Public Transit on the Rail

    Alternatives Analysis for High Capacity Public Transit on the Rail

    Proposal Alternatives Analysis for High Capacity Public Transit on the Rail Right of Way Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission in Partnership with Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District (METRO) RFP 2020-08-05 September 3, 2019 Contents 01 Transmittal Letter I 02 Work Plan 01 03 Schedule 09 04 Cost Proposal 10 05 Firm Qualifi cations 12 06 Project Team, Organization Chart, and Staffi ng Plan 16 07 Qualifi cations and Relevant Experience 19 08 Federally/State-Funded Transportation Project Experience 23 09 Management Approach 24 10 References 26 Appendix A Additional Information Appendix B Resumes Appendix C Exceptions and Deviations Appendix D Cost Proposal Detail by Task Appendix E Required Forms HDR supports sustainable resource conservation and material recycling practices. This proposal package is 100% recyclable. This page is intentionally left blank. September 3, 2019 Ginger Dykaar Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission 1523 Pacifi c Avenue Santa Cruz, CA 95060 RE: Proposal for Alternatives Analysis for High Capacity Public Transit on the Rail Right of Way RFP 2020-08-05 Dear Ms. Dykaar, HDR, a full service Planning and Engineering Corporation with a long-history of transportation planning and alternatives analysis experience, is pleased to submit this proposal to assist the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) and Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District (METRO) to conduct a high capacity transit alternatives analysis for the Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line. We have thoughtfully developed a complete team to meet every technical challenge required of the RTC and METRO including expertise across all transit modes and systems; federal, state, and local transport fi nance; travel modeling and market assessment; active transportation and trails; performance-based planning using triple bottom line processes and linkages to vision and goals; economic growth analysis; environmental and engineering constraints and design needs; value engineering and business planning; and engaging public and stakeholder partners.
  • The Bulletin NEW YORK CITY SUBWAY CAR UPDATE: Published by the Electric Railroaders’ R-32S RETURN to SERVICE! Association, Inc

    The Bulletin NEW YORK CITY SUBWAY CAR UPDATE: Published by the Electric Railroaders’ R-32S RETURN to SERVICE! Association, Inc

    ERA BULLETIN — AUGUST, 2020 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 63, No. 8 August, 2020 The Bulletin NEW YORK CITY SUBWAY CAR UPDATE: Published by the Electric Railroaders’ R-32s RETURN TO SERVICE! Association, Inc. (Photographs by Ron Yee) P. O. Box 3323 Grand Central Station New York, NY 10163 For general inquiries, or Bulletin submissions, contact us at bulletin@erausa. org or on our website at erausa. org/contact Editorial Staff: Jeff Erlitz Editor-in-Chief Ron Yee Tri-State News and Commuter Rail Editor Alexander Ivanoff North American and World News Editor David Ross Production Manager Copyright © 2020 ERA This Month’s Cover Photo: SNCF Z 8800 set 42B with Z 8884 driving motor in the lead, at Javel Station and soon to depart as an RER Line C service to Versailles on the occasion of a week- A train of R-32s, led by 3436-3437, is seen entering the Hewes Street station on July 9. end service change. The 8800 class are dual Several trains of the Phase I R-32s that from the East New York facility, a fleet which voltage 1.5 kV DC / 25 kV were recently resurrected were placed back was expanded to the following 90 as of July AC 50 Hz. Built by a con- sortium of Alstom-ANF- in revenue service on the J/Z starting on 12: 3360-3361, 3376-3377, 3380-3381, CIMT-TCO, they were deliv- the morning of July 1, with the start of anoth- 3388-3389, 3394-3397, 3400-3401, 3414- ered between 1986-1988.
  • Energy Saving and Voltage Stabilisation in Urban Electrified Public Transport of Belgrade – Analysis of Simulation Results

    Energy Saving and Voltage Stabilisation in Urban Electrified Public Transport of Belgrade – Analysis of Simulation Results

    10th International Scientific Conference “Science and Higher Education in Function of Sustainable Development” 06 – 07 October 2017, Mećavnik – Drvengrad, Užice, Serbia ENERGY SAVING AND VOLTAGE STABILISATION IN URBAN ELECTRIFIED PUBLIC TRANSPORT OF BELGRADE – ANALYSIS OF SIMULATION RESULTS Gavrilovic Branislav1, PhD; Bundalo Zoran2, PhD 1 Railway College of Vocational Studies, Belgrade, SERBIA, [email protected] 2 Railway College of Vocational Studies, Belgrade, SERBIA, [email protected] Abstract: The power consumption of a tram is characterized by distinct peaks combined with a low average value. Using an on- board energy storage, the overhead line peak power and energy consumption can be reduced. The storage device introduces a degree of freedom for control of the power flow. To incorporate the freedom an energy management is required. The design of the energy management can be seen as a multi-objective optimization problem with the objectives “minimize line peak power” and “minimize energy consumption”. As common to most multiobjective optimization problems it is not possible to minimize both objectives at the same time. This paper describes new on board energy storage systems applied in the urban electrified public transport in Belgrade (R. Serbia) Keywords: regenerative brak , energy consumption savings 1. INTRODUCTION The urban electrified public transport in Belgrade, employ the low voltage DC systems at 600 V, which are usually the most economic. In this case, the pantograph connects directly the contact line to the power inverters of the train by means of filter capacitors. The average distance between substations is very limited for example, in a subway at 750 V with heavy traffic, it can be of the order of 1.5 km, with minimum values of 1.3 km.
  • 21 New Tramways to Open This Year

    21 New Tramways to Open This Year

    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com MARCH 2017 NO. 951 21 NEW TRAMWAYS TO OPEN THIS YEAR Pesa: From trams to metro cars – a study in growth Puebla: Mexico’s first tram-train KeolisAmey wins in Manchester Nantes plans line 4 and fleet renewal CRRC in the US Ostrava 03> £4.40 China’s giant breaks Tramway’s role in a into North America post-industrial city 9 771460 832050 Phil Long Phil MANCHESTER VVoices from the industry… “Once again your team have proved your outstanding capabilities. The content was excellent and the 18-19 July 2017 feedback from participants was great.” Simcha Ohrenstein – CTO, Jerusalem LRT The UK Light Rail Conference and exhibition returns to Manchester for 2017, bringing together over 250 decision-makers from around the world for two days of “A great event, really well organised and open debate on all aspects of tramway and urban rail the dinner, reception and exhibition space operations and development. made for great networking time.” Andy Byford – CEO, Toronto Transit Commission With over eight hours of dedicated networking time, delegates can explore the latest industry innovation within the event’s exhibition and technical areas as well as “I really enjoyed the conference and made examining LRT’s role in alleviating congestion in our towns some helpful contacts. Thanks for bringing and cities and its potential for driving economic growth. such a professional event together.” Will Marshall – Siemens Mobility USA Topics and themes for 2017 include: > Rewriting the business case
  • Nasjonal Transportplan S. 2 Og 10

    Nasjonal Transportplan S. 2 Og 10

    Tidsskrift utgitt av For Jernbane 40. årgang - Nr. 2 - 2021 FORFORJERNBANEJERNBANE Nasjonal transportplan s. 2 og 10 - Batterifly s. 4 - Gods og klima s. 5 ISSN 0802-8915 www.jernbane.no FORJERNBANE NR. 2 -2021 Leder UTGIVER: Tidsskriftet FOR JERNBANE kommer med fire utgaver i året og utgis av organisasjonen FOR JERNBANE. FOR Stortingets Transportkomité leverte 7. juni sin innstilling til Nasjonal transport- JERNBANE er en frivillig, landsdekkende plan (NTP) 2022 - 2023. organisasjon som virker for at jernbanen skal utføre en vesentlig større andel av Kjell Erik Onsrud, leder av For Jernbane ([email protected]) transportarbeidet i Norge og mellom Norge og utlandet. Målet er redusert Fordelt over 12 år har regjeringa foreslått å bruke i alt 1200 mrd, hvorav 123 mrd belastning fra transportsektoren på miljø er bompenger. Regjeringspartiene i komiteen vil likevel øke investeringene i første og helse. periode med 1,5 mrd til jernbane og 3,5 mrd til veg. De foreslåtte vegprosjektene E134 Bakka-Solheim bør samordnes med en Vestlandsbane over Haukeli, og E14 Kontigent: 2021 kr 300 Stjørdal-Storlien med en utretting av den svingete Meråkerbanen. Kontonr. 1254.20.33523 Abonnement (ikke medlem) et år, FRP vil øke NTP med 400 mrd: 320 mrd til veg, 40 til jernbane og 20 spesielt til gods fire utgaver: kr 320. Løssalg: kr 85. på bane. Det vil innebære et stort løft. Likevel spørs det om ikke jernbanen relativt sett kan bli svekka med en så massiv vegsatsing. FRP nevner E134 over Haukeli. For Jernbane vil peke på en Haukelibane ikke bare som en Oslo-Bergen-forbindelse, men Ansvarlig redaktør: også som et nettverk mellom det sentrale Vestlandet og det sentrale Østlandet.