Iron Cage : the Story of the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Iron Cage : the Story of the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood PRAISE FOR THE IRON CAGE “Khalidi, tackling ‘historical amnesia,’ brilliantly analyses the structural handicap which hobbled the Palestinians throughout 30 years of British rule . Khalidi re- stores the Palestinians to something more than victims, acknowledging that for all their disadvantages, they have played their role and can (and must) still do so to determine their own fate.” —Ian Black, The Guardian “A deeply thought-provoking book about Palestinians by a foremost Palestinian scholar that refreshingly challenges stereotypes. Necessary and important.” —Ghada Karmi, author of Married to Another Man: Israel, the Palestinians, and the One-State Solution “A lucid and compelling examination of the Palestinian dilemma by ‘ arguably the foremost US historian of the modern Middle East’.” —Warren I. Cohen, Los Angeles Times “A first-rate and up-to-date historical and political analysis of the Palestinian predicament.” —Publishers Weekly, voting The Iron Cage one of the 100 Best Books of the Year “Khalidi asks crucial questions regarding the state of Palestinian identity and vi- ability that no other historians or political analysts have covered with such depth.” —Alejandra Juárez, Political Affairs “The Iron Cage is a patient and eloquent work, ranging over the whole of modern Palestinian history from World War I to the death of Yasser Arafat. Reorienting the Palestinian narrative around the attitudes and tactics of the Palestinians themselves, Khalidi lends a remarkable illumination to a story so wearily familiar it is often hard to believe anything new can be found within.” —Jonathan Shainin, Salon “Khalidi concentrates on the Palestinian side of this complex sui generis case . Yet Kahlidi ’s book is no exercise in victimology. He is tough on the British, the Israelis, and the Americans, but he is scarcely less hard-hitting in appraising the Palestinians. The final chapter provides an excellent critique of the Palestine Liberation Organ- ization’ s labored moves toward the recognition of Israel and the idea, increasingly bruited, that a two-state solution is no longer feasible. —L. Carl Brown, Foreign Affairs “The author of numerous critically acclaimed works including Resurrecting Empire, Rashid Khalidi is a historian’s historian. The Iron Cage is his most accomplished effort to date . Magisterial in scope, meticulous in its attention to detail, and decidedly dispassionate in its analysis, The Iron Cage is destined to be a benchmark of its genre.” —Joel Schalit, Tikkun “Rashid Khalidi’s Iron Cage is a must-read historical and political study of the national Palestinian movement . Supporters of the Palestinians and of Israel will read this book in different ways and with different eyes, but both will find Khalidi’s presentation richly illuminating.” —Neil Caplan, Middle East Journal “A work of forceful historical analysis written in a spirit of self-examination . The Iron Cage compels us to reflect more deeply on the problems that continue to bedevil the Palestinian movement.” —Bashir Abu-Manneh, The Nation Also by Rashid Khalidi British Policy towards Syria and Palestine, 1906–1914 Palestine and the Gulf (coeditor) Under Siege: PLO Decision-Making during the 1982 War The Origins of Arab Nationalism (coeditor) Palestinian Identity: The Construction of Modern National Consciousness Resurrecting Empire: Western Footprints and America’s Perilous Path in the Middle East The Iron Cage The Story of the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood Rashid Khalidi A Oneworld book First published in USA by Beacon Press First published in Great Britain by Oneworld Publications, 2007 Copyright © Rashid Khalidi, 2006 All rights reserved Copyright under Berne Convention A CIP record for this title is available from the British Library ISBN-13:978–1–85168–532–5 Typeset by Wilsted & Taylor Publishing Services Cover design by D.R. Ink Printed and bound by TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall Arabic words have been transliterated in keeping with a modified version of the system used by the International Journal of Middle East Studies (the only diacritics represented being the ain and the hamza), with exceptions for common nouns, individual names where there is a common spelling, and words within quotations. All translations from Arabic and French are the author's own. Oneworld Publications 185 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7AR England www.oneworld-publications.com NL08 Learn more about Oneworld. Join our mailing list to find out about our latest titles and special offers at: www.oneworld-publications.com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ontents Introduction: Writing Middle Eastern History in a Time of Historical Amnesia 1. Arab Society in Mandatory Palestine 2. The Palestinians and the British Mandate 3. A Failure of Leadership 4. The Revolt, 1948, and Afterward 5. Fateh, the PLO, and the PA: The Palestinian Para-State 6. Stateless in Palestine Notes Acknowledgments Index Introduction Writing Middle Eastern History in a Time of Historical Amnesia This book examines the failure of the Palestinians to establish an in- dependent state before 1948, the year of Israel’s founding and of the dissolution of Arab Palestine, and the impact of that failure in the years thereafter. Such a topic provokes a sequence of questions that relate to the present as much as to the past: What purpose is served by such a study when, nearly six decades after 1948, an independent Palestinian state—in any real sense of the word “independent”— still does not exist, and when its establishment continues to face formidable obstacles? The obstacles to independent Palestinian statehood only ap- peared to grow as violence escalated in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon during the summer of 2006. As these lines are written, in late July, Lebanon is the scene of hundreds of civilian deaths, enormous de- struction, and fierce ground combat. Almost forgotten as a result of the carnage visited on Lebanon by Israel, and of Hizballah’s re- peated rocket barrages against northern Israeli cities and towns, has been the suƒering in Gaza caused by months of Israeli siege and bombardment. It is also forgotten that all of this started with Pales- tinian eƒorts to create a democratic structure of governance while still under Israeli occupation. Specifically, this latest escalation began with response by Israel and the United States to the elections for the Legislative Council of the Palestinian Authority (PA) in January 2006, which brought to power a Hamas-led government. Their campaign quickly moved from a crippling financial siege of the PA, with the aim of bring- ing down that government, to an escalation of Israeli assassinations of Palestinian militants, and to artillery and air attacks in Gaza that introduction killed and wounded scores of civilians. Hamas had for eighteen months observed a cease-fire in the face of these and earlier provo- cations (other factions were not so restrained, firing rockets into Is- rael). However, after a major spike in Palestinian civilian deaths and the particularly provocative Israeli assassination of militant leader Jamal Abu Samhadana, whom the PA government had just named to a security post, Hamas finally took the bait and responded with the capture of one Israeli soldier and the killing of others. The pre- dictably ferocious Israeli response—even more killings of civilians, more assassinations, and ground incursions in Gaza—finally pro- voked Hizballah (or perhaps gave Hizballah and its allies, Iran and Syria, the preemptive opportunity they had been searching for). The rest of this tragic scenario then unfolded with the grim, bloody, unthinking precision we have seen so many times before in the conflict between Israel and the Arabs. This book is not about that conflict but about its Palestinian component, specifically the eƒort of the Palestinians to achieve in- dependence in their homeland. The ongoing war in Gaza and Leb- anon illustrates once again how intimately this eƒort is intertwined with regional and international factors. It illustrates also the crucial importance of a careful reading of recent Palestinian history to at- tain an understanding of the Middle East conflict. The one-dimen- sional and ahistorical approach to the conflict through the prism of terrorism that is prevalent in the United States obscures thoroughly the specificity of Palestine, Israel, Lebanon, and other regional ac- tors, like Syria and Iran, and how these relate to one another. The Palestinian quest for independence is only one of many elements that must be grasped in order to understand the causes of conflict in the Middle East. But because for nearly a century this quest has been so central to events there, willfully ignoring it leads to the kind of reductive, partial, and misguided American o‰cial thinking that has helped produce the profound problems that a~ict the region. This book raises other questions as well: Is a historical study of why something occurred—or in this case did not occur—justified be- introduction cause it sheds light on apparent similarities with events that are cur- rently taking place? Or are these two failures in state building—one in the past and the other ongoing—completely unrelated, and is any attempt to examine them in relation to one another an histori- cal error, not to say an abuse of history?1 It might be asked why I describe this failure to achieve indepen- dent statehood as a Palestinian failure.
Recommended publications
  • Israel by Sydney Fisher
    R EVIEW D IGEST: H UMAN R IGHTS & T HE W AR ON T ERROR Israel by Sydney Fisher Israel and Palestine have been in an “interim period” between full scale occupation and a negotiated end to the conflict for a long time. This supposedly intermediate period in the conflict has seen no respite from violations of Palestinians’ human rights or the suicide bombings affecting Israelis. This section will provide resources spanning the issues regarding Israel, Palestine and how the human rights dimensions of this conflict interact with the war on terror. The issue of how both sides will arrive at peace remains a mystery. Background Marek Arnaud. 2003. “The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Is There a Way Out?” Australian Journal of International Affairs. 57(2): 243. ABSTRACT: States that the blame for the inability to put an end to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians must be shared by all parties. Discusses issues of trust and U.S. involvement under both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. Joel Beinin. 2003. “Is Terrorism a Useful Term in Understanding the Middle East and the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict?” Radical History Review. 12. ABSTRACT: Examines the definition of the term “terrorism” in the context of the Middle East and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Politically motivated violence directed against civilian populations and atrocities committed in the course of repressing anticolonial rebellions. Shlomo Hasson. 1996. “Local Politics and Split Citizenship in Jerusalem.” International Journal of Urban & Regional Research. 20(1): 116. ABSTRACT: Explores the relationship between ethno-national conflict, local politics and citizenship rights in Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Visiting the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 in Palestine
    Oberlin Digital Commons at Oberlin Honors Papers Student Work 2016 Contested Land, Contested Representations: Re-visiting the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 in Palestine Gabriel Healey Brown Oberlin College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/honors Part of the History Commons Repository Citation Brown, Gabriel Healey, "Contested Land, Contested Representations: Re-visiting the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 in Palestine" (2016). Honors Papers. 226. https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/honors/226 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Digital Commons at Oberlin. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at Oberlin. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Contested Land, Contested Representations: Re-visiting the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 in Palestine Gabriel Brown Candidate for Senior Honors in History Oberlin College Thesis Advisor: Zeinab Abul-Magd Spring/2016 Table of Contents Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………………...1 Map of Palestine, 1936……………………………………………………………………………2 Glossary…………………………………………………………………………………………...3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter One……………………………………………………………………………………...15 Chapter Two……………………………………………………………………………………...25 Chapter Three…………………………………………………………………………………….37 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………….50 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………. 59 Brown 1 Acknowledgements Large research endeavors like this one are never undertaken alone, and I would be remiss if I didn’t thank the many people who have helped me along the way. I owe a huge debt to Shelley Lee, Jesse Gamoran, Gavin Ratcliffe, Meghan Mette, and Daniel Hautzinger, whose kind feedback throughout the year sharpened my ideas and improved the coherence of my work more times than I can count. A special thank you to Sam Coates-Finke and Leo Harrington, who were always ready to listen as I worked through the writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • Examples of Iraq and Syria
    BearWorks MSU Graduate Theses Fall 2017 The Unraveling of the Nation-State in the Middle East: Examples of Iraq and Syria Zachary Kielp Missouri State University, [email protected] As with any intellectual project, the content and views expressed in this thesis may be considered objectionable by some readers. However, this student-scholar’s work has been judged to have academic value by the student’s thesis committee members trained in the discipline. The content and views expressed in this thesis are those of the student-scholar and are not endorsed by Missouri State University, its Graduate College, or its employees. Follow this and additional works at: https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses Part of the International Relations Commons, and the Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons Recommended Citation Kielp, Zachary, "The Unraveling of the Nation-State in the Middle East: Examples of Iraq and Syria" (2017). MSU Graduate Theses. 3225. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/3225 This article or document was made available through BearWorks, the institutional repository of Missouri State University. The work contained in it may be protected by copyright and require permission of the copyright holder for reuse or redistribution. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UNRAVELING OF THE NATION-STATE IN THE MIDDLE EAST: EXAMPLES OF IRAQ AND SYRIA A Masters Thesis Presented to The Graduate College of Missouri State University TEMPLATE In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science, Defense and Strategic Studies By Zachary Kielp December 2017 Copyright 2017 by Zachary Kielp ii THE UNRAVELING OF THE NATION-STATE IN THE MIDDLE EAST: EXAMPLES OF IRAQ AND SYRIA Defense and Strategic Studies Missouri State University, December 2017 Master of Science Zachary Kielp ABSTRACT After the carnage of World War One and the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire a new form of political organization was brought to the Middle East, the Nation-State.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming Downs Horse Race Track 10180 Hwy 89 North • Evanston, WY 82930 Wydowns.Com
    In association with the Wyoming All Breeds Racing Association and Utah Quarter Horse Racing Association PRESENTS THE FIRST ANNUAL Wyoming Downs All Breed Race-bred Horse Sale following the last horse race approx. 5:30 pm Saturday, August 18, 2018 On-site at Wyoming Downs. Horse previewing: 10 am Saturday, August 18, until sale. Wyoming Downs Horse Race Track 10180 Hwy 89 North • Evanston, WY 82930 wydowns.com FIRST ANNUAL FIRST ANNUAL WYOMING DOWNS WYOMING DOWNS ALL BREED RACE-BRED HORSEALL SALE BREED RACE-BRED HORSE SALE In Association with the Wyoming AllIn Breeds Association Racing with Association the Wyoming and All Breeds Racing Association and Utah Quarter Horse Racing Association Utah Quarter Horse Racing Association Thoroughbreds, Quarter Horses,Thoroughbreds, Appaloosas and Quarter Paints Horses, of all ages Appaloosas and Paints of all ages Saturday, August 18, 2018Saturday, August 18, 2018 After the Races, ApproximatelyAfter 5:30 the PM Races, Approximately 5:30 PM Horse Previewing: 10:00 AM Until SaleHorse Begins Previewing: 10:00 AM Until Sale Begins On Site at Wyoming Downs RacetrackOn Site at Wyoming Downs Racetrack 10180 Highway 89 North, Evanston,10180 HighwayWyoming 89 82930 North, Evanston, Wyoming 82930 WYOMING DOWNS OFFICIALSWYOMING DOWNS OFFICIALS General Manager: Eric NelsonGeneral Manager [email protected]: Eric Nelson [email protected] Racing Secretary: Sean WinsorRacing Secretary: [email protected] Sean Winsor [email protected] Director of Operations: Jodi LopezDirector of Operations:[email protected] Jodi
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Arab Palestine, No-Go Areas, and the Conflicted Course of British Counter-Insurgency During the Great Rebellion, 1936–1939
    Chapter 6 “Government Forces Dare Not Penetrate”: Urban Arab Palestine, No-Go Areas, and the Conflicted Course of British Counter-Insurgency during the Great Rebellion, 1936–1939 Simon Davis The Great Palestine Arab rebellion against British rule, sometimes termed the first authentic intifada,1 lasted from April 1936 until summer 1939. The British Mandate’s facilitation of Zionist expansion in Palestine had since the 1920s recurrently aroused violent Arab protest, mainly at urban points of interface with Jewish communities. Initially, the great rebellion seemed just such an- other occurrence, beginning with inter-communal riots in Manshiyeh, the mixed Arab-Jewish workers’ suburb separating the Jewish city of Tel Aviv from its mainly Arab neighbor Jaffa. But despite the reinforcement of exhausted Palestine Police with 300 Cameron Highlanders, a quarter of the infantry in Palestine, the disorders metamorphosed into lasting, territory-wide Arab civil disobedience. Coordinated by National Committees in each principal town, elite leaders hurriedly formed the Jerusalem-based Arab Higher Committee, hoping to preserve leadership over qualitatively new levels of nationally con- scious activism. Proliferating rural sniping and sabotage, mainly on Jewish settlements, most engaged the British military, predisposed to familiar small- war, anti-banditry traditions, largely derived from experience in India. But urban political violence, mainly in the form of reciprocally escalating Arab and Jewish bombings, shootings and stabbings, was left to the increasingly over- whelmed police. Consequent loss of control over Arab towns forced the British High Commissioner, Sir Arthur Wauchope, to invoke emergency regulations in June 1936. But subsequent military repression, frequently contemptuous of civil political context, merely aggravated Arab resistance, which was trans- formed, British observers noted, from past patterns of spasmodic anti-Zionist violence into a comprehensive uprising against British Mandatory rule itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Duncan Kennedy, Harvard Law School, Israel/Palestine Legal Issues, Fall 2007
    Is pal full syll 11/07/07 Seminar Israel/Palestine Legal Issues Syllabus Duncan Kennedy Course Summary Class 1: Historical background up to 1949 Part one: Inside Israel Class 2: The legalities of the appropriation of Palestinian land Class 3: The public law structure of the Israeli polity: “Jewish and democratic” Class 4: The issue of discrimination against the Arab minority Part two: The West Bank and Gaza Class 5: Legal status of the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, and of Israeli settlements Class 6: The issue of the duties of the occupier with respect to social and economic development: before Oslo and after Oslo Class 7: Are the settlements occupation or de facto annexation? Class 8: Palestinian resistance: the legality or not of violence in response to occupation Class 9: The targets and techniques of armed resistance: the issue of Palestinian violations of international humanitarian law Class 10: The legality or not of Israeli responses to Palestinian resistance Part Three: Legal dimensions of deal breaking issues Class 11: Sovereighty: The status of Jerusalem and the binational state proposal Class 12: The right of return as a legal issue Class 1: Historical background Historical documents (except for the Fourteen Points, all are from The Israel-Arab Reader (Walter Laqueur & Barry Rubin, eds.)) 1 The Fourteen Points from Wikipedia Sykes-Picot agreement MacMahon letter Balfour Declaration Emir Faisal – Chaim Weizmann agreement League of Nations Mandate for Palestine Israeli Declaration of Independence U.N. Resolutions 194 & 303 Israeli Law of Return Aaron Wolf, Hydropolitics along the Jordan River: Scarce Water and its Impact on the Arab-Israeli Conflict (New York: United Nations University Press, 1995) (background summary) Nur Masalha, The Politics of Denial: Israel and the Palestinian Refugee Problem (London: Pluto Press, 2003), ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundaries, Barriers, Walls
    1 Boundaries, Barriers, Walls Jerusalem’s unique landscape generates a vibrant interplay between natural and built features where continuity and segmentation align with the complexity and volubility that have characterized most of the city’s history. The softness of its hilly contours and the harmony of the gentle colors stand in contrast with its boundar- ies, which serve to define, separate, and segregate buildings, quarters, people, and nations. The Ottoman city walls (seefigure )2 separate the old from the new; the Barrier Wall (see figure 3), Israelis from Palestinians.1 The former serves as a visual reminder of the past, the latter as a concrete expression of the current political conflict. This chapter seeks to examine and better understand the physical realities of the present: how they reflect the past, and how the ancient material remains stimulate memory, conscious knowledge, and unconscious perception. The his- tory of Jerusalem, as it unfolds in its physical forms and multiple temporalities, brings to the surface periods of flourish and decline, of creation and destruction. TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOGRAPHY The topographical features of Jerusalem’s Old City have remained relatively con- stant since antiquity (see figure ).4 Other than the Central Valley (from the time of the first-century historian Josephus also known as the Tyropoeon Valley), which has been largely leveled and developed, most of the city’s elevations, protrusions, and declivities have maintained their approximate proportions from the time the city was first settled. In contrast, the urban fabric and its boundaries have shifted constantly, adjusting to ever-changing demographic, socioeconomic, and political conditions.2 15 Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregory File
    Nuclear Peace in the Levant By: Gregory A. File, B.S. Political Science Thesis Director: Dr. Peter Rudloff, PhD Political Science Second Reader: Dr. James Scott, PhD Political Science 1 Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………..3 I. Introduction………………………………………………………..4 II. Literature Review…………………………………………………5 Nuclear Proliferation: The Good…………………………….5 Nuclear Proliferation: The Bad………………………………16 III. Theory………………………………………………………………19 IV. Case Studies………………………………………………………...24 Iraq………………………………………………………………25 Egypt…………………………………………………………….32 Jordan……………………………………………………………40 Lebanon……………………………………………………….....48 Syria……………………………………………………………...56 Summation…………………………………………………….....66 V. The Iranian Threat………………………………………………….69 Friends Now Enemies…………………………………………..70 Going Nuclear…………………………………………………...71 Apocalyptic Government……………………………………….72 The People……………………………………………………….73 Conclusion……………………………………………………….75 VI. Bringing Nuclear Peace to the Levant……………………………..75 Problem………………………………………………………….76 Policy Recommendation………………………………………..77 Summary………………………………………………………..78 VII. Conclusion…………………………………………………………..79 VIII. Bibliography…………………………………………………………82 2 Abstract Ever since the first atomic bomb was dropped over Japan to end World War II, there have been many questions that arise from the use of nuclear bombs. There are two basic arguments for the employment of nuclear weapons. One is the deterrence policy. This ensures that a state will not be attacked by its hostile neighbors. The second is a policy of brinkmanship. This is the policy of using one’s nuclear arsenal to coerce others to give into one’s demands. Both of these policies will be explored in this paper. The main point of this paper is to explore the relations between Israel and the Arab neighbors who were involved in the Arab-Israeli wars. Specifically, the paper will look at when Israel proliferated in order to gain a better understanding if that event played any factor in producing peace/cold peace between Israel and these Arab countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock Department Premium Book
    State of Illinois JB Pritzker, Governor Department of Agriculture Jerry Costello II, Director 2021 Illinois State Fair Livestock Department Premium Book DIVISION I LIVESTOCK DEPARTMENT PREMIUM BOOK OF THE 168th YEAR OF ILLINOIS STATE FAIR AUGUST 12-22, 2021 DIVISION I - LIVESTOCK DEPARTMENT PREMIUM BOOK DIVISION II - GENERAL PREMIUM BOOK DIVISION III - GENERAL 4-H PROJECTS DIVISION IV - NON-SOCIETY HORSE SHOWS PREMIUM BOOK DIVISION V - SOCIETY HORSE SHOW PREMIUM BOOK DIVISION VI - SPECIAL EVENTS PREMIUM BOOK JB PRITZKER GOVERNOR JERRY COSTELLO II DIRECTOR KEVIN GORDON MANAGER Printed by Authority of the State of Illinois #21-269/05-25/400 copies 1 Welcome to the 2021 Illinois Sta te Fa ir! Whether you’re joining us in Springfield or in Du Quoin, our state fairs bring together residents and visitors alike, to celebrate all that Illinois has to offer when we stand together – an all-the- more important mission this year. Illinois’ proud agricultural tradition has long been the force that drives our state forward, and the last 18 months have been no different. In March of 2020, when the world seemed to come to a halt, our state’s number one industry kept right on going. After all, there were still crops and animals to care for, deliveries to make, and people to feed. So, even in the face of a global pandemic, Illinois’ farmers, small businesses and commodity groups all came together to keep our food chain secure, a true testament to the vibrancy of the sector. And because no industry was immune to the pains of the last year, the Pritzker administration directed $5 million to help with livestock losses and other costs through our Business Interruption Grant program.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Shatters Government
    Jewish ‘Nation-State’ Issue Shatters Government One of our bloggers examined this issue exactly one week ago. Today’s news headlines indicate that the Netanyahu government is collapsing over this matter, prompting new elections in March or April. Most of what follows is a sampling of news coverage and commentary as summarized by the J Street daily News Roundup: Why Netanyahu Sacrificed His Coalition Over the Nation-State Law, The American Prospect According to Gershom Gorenberg, Machiavellian explanations are too kind. The bill expresses what he believes: that Israel has become too democratic. Israel’s “Jewish State” Debate Plays Politics with Essence of Israeli Democracy, J Street Blog J Street said that Israel’s proposed ‘Jewish State’ law is unnecessary, ill- judged and damaging to democracy and should be set aside. Bibi’s ‘nation-state’ law: The damage has already been done – to Israel, Haaretz According to Bradley Burston, “In effect, the [Jewish state] law would turn all of Israel into the West Bank.” Abbas: Jewish state law an obstacle to peace, Jerusalem Post President Abbas said on Tuesday that the proposed “Jewish state bill” “places obstacles in the way to achieving peace.” Ultra-Orthodox and Reform Jews share distaste for nation-state bill, Haaretz Reform and Conservative Jews fear that the bill favors an Orthodox take on Jewish law, while the ultra-Orthodox say the spirit is more national and secular than religious. EU urges Israel to uphold democracy in ‘Jewish state’ bill, Times of Israel A senior European Union source said that the law must preserve Israel’s democratic standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Light at the End of Their Tunnels? Hamas & the Arab
    LIGHT AT THE END OF THEIR TUNNELS? HAMAS & THE ARAB UPRISINGS Middle East Report N°129 – 14 August 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. TWO SIDES OF THE ARAB UPRISINGS .................................................................... 1 A. A WEDDING IN CAIRO.................................................................................................................. 2 B. A FUNERAL IN DAMASCUS ........................................................................................................... 5 1. Balancing ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Mediation ..................................................................................................................................... 6 3. Confrontation ............................................................................................................................... 7 4. The crossfire................................................................................................................................. 8 5. Competing alliances ................................................................................................................... 10 C. WHAT IMPACT ON HAMAS? ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Intifadah and the 1936-1939 Uprising: a Comparison of the Palestinian Arab Communities 1
    The Intifadah and the 1936-1939 Uprising: A Comparison of the Palestinian Arab Communities 1 Kenneth W. Stein The Carter Center March, 1990 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. Part I-Similarities 3. Part II-Comparisons I. Palestinian Leadership II. Character and Participation III. The Islamic Dimension IV. Duration and Effects 4. Part III - Conclusions 5. About the Author Executive Summary When comparing the 1936-1939 Palestinian uprising in various parts of western Palestine to the present intifadah, 2 taking place in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem, the most striking conclusion is the large number of general similarities between these two manifestations of Palestinian national consciousness. 3 The two most significant differences between the uprisings, however, are first, that the intifadah generated a deeper and more prolonged Palestinian national coherence across all classes than did its predecessor. Second, the intifadah clarified and crystallized Palestinian opinion which in conjunction with other events helped to create a historic compromise in Palestinian public policy. Other major differences between the two uprisings are self-evident. Many pertain to the political environments in which both uprisings unfolded. During the 1936-1939 uprising, there were no existing UN resolutions about Palestine. There was no Israel, no Israeli Arab population, no Palestinian political organization of the stature and strength of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), no decade-old Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty as a backdrop to an ongoing larger negotiating process, no decision made by the Hashemites in the midst of the uprising to place the responsibility of diplomatic progress on the shoulders of the Palestinian leadership, no willingness by a significant number of leading Palestinian Arab politicians to accept a Jewish state in a portion of Palestine, and no corresponding willingness on the part of an equally important number of Zionist/Israel leaders to assent to the legitimacy of Palestinian national aspirations.
    [Show full text]