DOCSLIB.ORG

Putting the Story Back in History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Putting the Story Back in History Barbarian Kingdoms 476 A.D. Germanic Kingdoms • Migration to Rome was gradual, increased 5th century. • Many Romanized-Germans were Arian Christian. • Most German invaders took over Roman institutions – Became the new ‘nobility’, with separate language, religion. • Barbarian tribes associated with final destinations: – Visigoths—Spain – Saxons—Britain – Vandals—Africa – Ostrogoths—Italy – Franks—France – Burgundians—France – Lombards—Italy – Huns—?Hungary? www.Heritage-History.com www.Heritage-History.com German Migrations—Foederati Alaric the Visigoth • Foederati were German tribes that protected borders of the Roman Empire • Visigoths fled across Danube from ‘Hungary’ • As Western Empire broke down, Roman legions were replaced by feoderati. when Huns invaded their territory (376). – Romanized Germans vowed to help resist Huns, uncivilized, murderous Barbarians. foederati – Goths crossed Danube, accepted as foederati in 376. – Served eastern Emperor as • Foederati considered themselves Roman citizens, not Barbarians. • Alaric became king of Visigoths in 396 th – Leading Roman Generals during 5 century were at least partially German. – Led Visigoth legion to ransack Greece, took Athens – Stilicho (Vandal/Roman), Aetius (Goth/Italian), Ricimer (Suevian/Visigoth) • Alaric, Visigoth leader attacked Rome when betrayed by Emperor Honorius. • Visigoths invaded Rome in 410 • Theodoric, Ostrogoth leader, ruled 6th century Italy for Byzantine Emperor. – Demanded territory for Visigoth settlement • Clovis, Frankish leader, defeated last Roman governor of Gaul. – Alaric died shortly after conquering Rome VISIGOTHS CROSSED DANUBE INTO EAST EMPIRE, 376 A.D. MIGRATIONS OCCURRED FROM LATE 300S TO 500S. ALARIC LEAD SACK OF ROME IN 410, THEN DIED SUDDENLY. VISIGOTHS DIVERTED A RIVER TO BURY HIS BODY Visigoth Kingdom of Spain Visigoths in Hispania • 418 Settled in Southern Gaul, capital at Toulouse • 410—Ataulf, Nephew of Alaric promised land in • 451 Allied with Aetius against Attila the Hun (left). Gaul if he fought pagan Suevi, Alani, and Vandals. • 507 Drove Vandals and Suevi out of Spain. – Visigoths Vassal state until Fall of Rome – New Visigoth capital at Toledo – First Visigoth capital was in Toulouse. – Vandals crossed into Africa in 430. • 589 Recarred I converted to Catholicism (right). • 450—Visigoth King Theodoric allied with Romans against Attila the Hun at Battle of • 711 Roderic Overthrown by Moslem invaders. Chalons. – Visigoths dominant power in Hispania by 450 • 475—Visigoths become Independent kingdom • 507—Visigoths driven out of Gaul by Franks • 586—Recared converts to Catholicism • 589—Council of Toledo condemns Arianism • 672—King Wamba is deposed • 711—Visigoths under Roderick defeated by Moors FROM TOP: 1) VISIGOTHS SETTLE IN GAUL, DRIVE OTHER GERMANS www.Heritage-History.com OUT 2) FIRST VISIGOTH KINGDOM IN GAUL (IN RED), CAPITAL AT VISIGOTH KING KILLED BATTLING ATTILA THE HUN VISIGOTH KING CONVERTED TO CATHOLIC FAITH TOULOUSE. 3) KING THEODORIC KILLED AT THE BATTLE OF CHAONS. Conversion of Visigoth Kings • St. Hermenegild Visigoth prince converted from Arianism to Catholicism, imprisoned and martyred by his father. His brother Recared, later became the king, and followed Hermenegild’s example, accepting the Catholic faith. • St. Leander of Seville Bishop of Seville instrumental in converting the Arian Visigoths, including Recarred and Hermenegild to the Roman Faith. • St. Isidore of Seville Followed his brother Leander as Bishop of Seville, finished his work of converting Visigoths. Outstanding scholar, he resisted Arianism and worked to preserve the best of Roman literature. www.Heritage-History.com www.Heritage-History.com HERMENGILD LEANDER OF SEVILLE ISIDORE OF SEVILLE Visigoth Spain becomes Catholic Vandal Kingdom of Africa • Recared converted to Catholicism in 588 – Entire court at Toledo converted with him – Put down Arian rebellions in North – Gained support of commoners and Church • 3rd Council of Toledo condemned Arianism – No more distinctions between Visigoth/Romans – Restrictions on Jewish trade/slaves/conversions • After council, kings elected by bishops. – Central government more influential 3RD COUNCIL OF TOLEDO CONDEMNED ARIANISM, MADE VISIGOTH SPAIN CATHOLIC, RESTRICTED – Local nobles, regional leaders, lost power JEWS. – Many Jews restricted from trade, forced to convert, ISIDORE OF SEVILLE ANCIENT CATHOLIC MASS CONVERSION OF RECARED Vandals Vandals in Africa • Insignificant until rise of Genseric • Arian Vandals severely persecuted Nicene • More vicious that other tribes. Christians of N. Africa. – Plundered, rather than governed • Julia of Corsica was Carthaginian maiden sold – Pirates, not merchants into slavery by Vandals, then martyred. – Hastened collapse of Rome • Augustine of Hippo killed during Vandal siege JULIE OF CORSICA – Terrorized the population of Hippo in 430. • Rise of Genseric in 428 • Christians in N. Africa, already divided by – Captured Roman port/fleet Donatist heresy, greatly weakened by Vandals. – Welcomed pillagers of all races • North Africa reconquered by Byzantine Empire – Invaded Northern Africa in 533, after several unsuccessful attempts. – Besieged Augustine in Hippo • Nicene Christianity weakened by persecution – Captured Carthage and divisions, never recovered. Could not • Expedition against Vandals failed in resist Moslem conquest ~650. 460, Africa reconquered in 533. www.Heritage-History.com www.Heritage-History.com AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO Fall of Italy Ostrogoths and Lombards • 410 Visigoths attack on Rome • 451 Attila the Hun turned away from Rome • Ostrogoths were Arian Christians, foederati. • 455 Vandals Sack of Rome • 476 Fall of Last Roman leader of Western Empire.pire. • Theodoric became king in 473 • 476-493 Reign of Odoacer as ‘King of Italy’ – Raised as a hostage at court of Emperor in Constantinople. • 493-526 Reign of Theodoric the Ostrogoth – United Ostrogoths, reconquered • 535-554 Gothic War devastates, depopulatestes Italy Italy with help from East Empire. DIVIDED ITALY – Byzantine Empire claims control of the wreckage of Italy. – Ruled Italy independently, 473 to • 568 Lombards invade northern Italy, meet no resistance. 526, capital in Ravenna (top). • 584-751 Italy divided: Kingdom of Lombards in North, • Gothic War devastated Italy Byzantine controlled ‘Exarchate of Ravenna’ on coasts. – On death of Theodoric, Byzantines – 568-774 Kingdom of Lombards (Milan, Pavia, Turin) reconquered, depopulated Italy. – 584-751 Exarchate of Ravenna (Rome, Ravenna, Sicily, Venice) • Italy invaded by pagan Lombards • 535-754 ‘Byzantine Papacy’ —Bishops of Rome subject to – For 200 years, prostrate Italy approval of Emperor of Constantinople. divided by Byzantines and Lombardss.).). www.Heritage-History.com DIVIDED ITALY 550-750 LOMBARDS INVADE NORTH Saint Popes During Dark Ages Saints of Italy • 289-371 Eusebius of Vercelli — Bishop who led resistance to Arian heresy in Italy. • 366-384 Damascus I – Promoted orthodox understanding of the Trinity to resist heretical ideas, and supported Jerome’s • 359-431 Paulinus of Nola — Roman senator work on the Vulgate Bible. who became a monk, served as bishop of Nola. • 401-417 Innocent I – Finalized Biblical Canon, Pope during • 380-450 Peter Chrysologus — Bishop of Visigoth sack of Rome. Ravenna noted for his homilies, apologetics, and opposition to heresies. Doctor of the Church. • 440-461 Leo the Great – Opposed Attila the Hun, renowned theologian, laid foundation for Council of Chalcedon. • 480-524 Boethius — Minister of Theodoric the Great. Wrote Christian classic: Consolation of • 537-752 EXARCH OF RAVENNA — BYZANTINE PAPACY Philosophy. Died a martyr, but not canonized. – Roman Bishop subject to, protected by Emperor of Constantinople. • 590-604 Gregory the Great – Reformed Papacy and church • 480-543 Benedict of Nursia — Founder of Western Monasticism, including one at Monte organization, Supported monasticism and missionary work, Cassino. Wrote Rules of Benedict. Promoted divine liturgy and Gregorian Chant, etc. • 649-655 Martin I – Only pope to resist dominance of • 480-542 Scholastica — Twin sister of Benedict. Lived in convent near Monte Cassino. Byzantine Emperor, Last Martyr pope. FROM TOP: EUSEBIUS OF VERCELLI WITH ST. SEBASTIAN AND istory.com ST. ROCH, PAULINUS OF NOLA, BENEDICT AND SCHOLASTICA. e-History.com .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the D
    The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Marion Woodrow Kruse, III Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Anthony Kaldellis, Advisor; Benjamin Acosta-Hughes; Nathan Rosenstein Copyright by Marion Woodrow Kruse, III 2015 ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the use of Roman historical memory from the late fifth century through the middle of the sixth century AD. The collapse of Roman government in the western Roman empire in the late fifth century inspired a crisis of identity and political messaging in the eastern Roman empire of the same period. I argue that the Romans of the eastern empire, in particular those who lived in Constantinople and worked in or around the imperial administration, responded to the challenge posed by the loss of Rome by rewriting the history of the Roman empire. The new historical narratives that arose during this period were initially concerned with Roman identity and fixated on urban space (in particular the cities of Rome and Constantinople) and Roman mythistory. By the sixth century, however, the debate over Roman history had begun to infuse all levels of Roman political discourse and became a major component of the emperor Justinian’s imperial messaging and propaganda, especially in his Novels. The imperial history proposed by the Novels was aggressivley challenged by other writers of the period, creating a clear historical and political conflict over the role and import of Roman history as a model or justification for Roman politics in the sixth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of a Plant: the Olive in Early Medieval Italy, 400-900 CE By
    Profile of a Plant: The Olive in Early Medieval Italy, 400-900 CE by Benjamin Jon Graham A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Professor Paolo Squatriti, Chair Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes Professor Richard P. Tucker Professor Raymond H. Van Dam © Benjamin J. Graham, 2014 Acknowledgements Planting an olive tree is an act of faith. A cultivator must patiently protect, water, and till the soil around the plant for fifteen years before it begins to bear fruit. Though this dissertation is not nearly as useful or palatable as the olive’s pressed fruits, its slow growth to completion resembles the tree in as much as it was the patient and diligent kindness of my friends, mentors, and family that enabled me to finish the project. Mercifully it took fewer than fifteen years. My deepest thanks go to Paolo Squatriti, who provoked and inspired me to write an unconventional dissertation. I am unable to articulate the ways he has influenced my scholarship, teaching, and life. Ray Van Dam’s clarity of thought helped to shape and rein in my run-away ideas. Diane Hughes unfailingly saw the big picture—how the story of the olive connected to different strands of history. These three people in particular made graduate school a humane and deeply edifying experience. Joining them for the dissertation defense was Richard Tucker, whose capacious understanding of the history of the environment improved this work immensely. In addition to these, I would like to thank David Akin, Hussein Fancy, Tom Green, Alison Cornish, Kathleen King, Lorna Alstetter, Diana Denney, Terre Fisher, Liz Kamali, Jon Farr, Yanay Israeli, and Noah Blan, all at the University of Michigan, for their benevolence.
    [Show full text]
  • Journeys to Byzantium? Roman Senators Between Rome and Constantinople
    Journeys to Byzantium? Roman Senators Between Rome and Constantinople Master’s Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael Anthony Carrozzo, B.A Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Thesis Committee: Kristina Sessa, Advisor Timothy Gregory Anthony Kaldellis Copyright by Michael Anthony Carrozzo 2010 Abstract For over a thousand years, the members of the Roman senatorial aristocracy played a pivotal role in the political and social life of the Roman state. Despite being eclipsed by the power of the emperors in the first century BC, the men who made up this order continued to act as the keepers of Roman civilization for the next four hundred years, maintaining their traditions even beyond the disappearance of an emperor in the West. Despite their longevity, the members of the senatorial aristocracy faced an existential crisis following the Ostrogothic conquest of the Italian peninsula, when the forces of the Byzantine emperor Justinian I invaded their homeland to contest its ownership. Considering the role they played in the later Roman Empire, the disappearance of the Roman senatorial aristocracy following this conflict is a seminal event in the history of Italy and Western Europe, as well as Late Antiquity. Two explanations have been offered to explain the subsequent disappearance of the Roman senatorial aristocracy. The first involves a series of migrations, beginning before the Gothic War, from Italy to Constantinople, in which members of this body abandoned their homes and settled in the eastern capital.
    [Show full text]
  • 037 690305 the Trans
    Horld ElstorY >#9 h. Eoeb Hednesday P.t{. lEE TnAtrSIfIOnAt KII{GDUSs VAI{DI,LS' HEiltLI' OSIBT0ES lfter the Roam defeat bf tbe Vlaigoths at 441b,gs tn t8, rp bart the cqo- uautng eto:y of the collapse of tbe Rccdr &pfre ps fo:nd e pag€ 134 fn t+g"r. Stlllcho rt tll3 bottm of tb3 flrst col:uor rp dlscswr tbat tbe @ercr Bcrorlu a (9*t&3) rypolntect Ure VErSgl Stlllplro es Easter of tbe troops. Eere nas a sltaratlcn rbera a Uerlgqls EA ffid ofE-tbe nttltary forceel It rns not just tbat tbs C'€ina,s ;ffi-:y lrr charge of Ee rrall alorg tbe RhJ.ne, hrt,gon me of tbeo le tn obarge of tbe Rmm arry fneiae tbp r.ratl! Itrs ltke tbe cansLto nose under tbe tmt. far see litt&e ty ltttte rbat is bappentng I Golng to colu.m tvo: trr 406 Cauf. ras ,qP.rnm by Vmdals srd other trlltBs. dgpqf:re-of fn Lgt'51o tberc vas @ lccc'ed evaoratlor € Brltafg.-the..cglete t& troq>J- dates rnay:Er@g$E- sore sdrcAsErt f thl$k tbls is tbe elgplslg dg!g- for tho purposef\r1 evasusticn of the ls1ad. lnd then ln lueust of /+oB Sbilfpl*r l€g Elgl*g at Fcrelusr cdsrt ttt€ @ere did no[ tnrEt brs rnlrrtary c@EQs r.nre Just not golng rtght fcr tie fupire. Rm Sacked I relgn llotlce next that tbe @eror Theodoslus. erperor ll th9 9eg! $o b€99 -hie i" 4OS; ;i"*ua tbe earllest' colleffilf existLne lgggr tbe-lieodoela CodE.; l&eD yan_bave a good rJ"i6W bas to 16rltlply,-fi c1assl$r -md cod,l.$ none-art none latr, "tafc"trcn tbat socLety breatcnp'0gg, due to lncreased ccrlos srd Laltless:eegt lbea people ar€ Uun"":irg tb€r'selvee teet'e ls no need for a lot of lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Achila, Visigothic King, 34 Acisclus, Córdoban Martyr, 158 Adams
    Index ; Achila, Visigothic king, 34 Almodóvar del Río, Spain, 123–24 Acisclus, Córdoban martyr, 158 Almonacid de la Cuba, Spain, 150. See Adams, Robert, 21 also Dams Aemilian, St., 160 Alonso de la Sierra, Juan, 97 Aerial photography, 40, 82 Amalaric, Visigothic king, 29–30, 132, Aetius, Roman general, 173–75 157 Africa, 4, 21–23; and amphorae, 116, Amber, 114 137, 187, 196; and ARS, 46, 56, 90, Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman histo- 99, 187; and Byzantine reconquest, rian, 166, 168 30; and ‹shing, 103; and olive oil, Amphorae, 43, 80, 199–200; exported 88, 188; and Roman army, 114, 127, from Spain, 44, 97–98, 113, 115–16, 166; and trade, 105, 141; and Van- 172; kilns, 61–62, 87–90, 184; from dals, 27–28, 97, 127, 174 North Africa, 129, 187. See also African Red Slip (ARS) pottery, 101, Kilns 147, 186–87, 191, 197; de‹nition, 41, Anderson, Perry, 5 43, 44, 46; and site survival, 90, Andujar, Spain, 38, 47, 63 92–95, 98–99; and trade, 105–6, 110, Annales, 8, 12, 39 114, 116, 129, 183 Annona: disruption by Vandals, 97, Agde, council of, 29, 36, 41 174; to Roman army, 44, 81, 114–17; Agglomeration, 40–42, 59, 92 to Rome, 23, 27, 44, 81, 113; under Agila, Visigothic king, 158–59. See Ostrogoths, 29, 133. See also Army also Athanagild Antioch, Syria, 126 Agrippa, Roman general, 118 Anti-Semitism, 12, 33. See also Jews Alans, 24, 26, 27, 34, 126, 175 Antonine Itinerary, 152 Alaric, Visigothic king, 2, 5, 26–27 Apuleius, Roman writer, 75–76, 122 Alaric II, Visigothic king, 29–30 Aqueducts, 119, 130, 134, 174–75 Alcalá del Río, Spain, 40, 44, 93, 123, Aquitaine, France, 2, 27, 45, 102 148 Arabs, 33–34, 132–33, 137.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barbarians Invade the Roman Empire
    THE STORY OF EUROPE FROM THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE TO THE REFORMATION THE STORY OF EUROPE FROM THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE TO THE REFORMATION BY H. E. MARSHALL CONTAINING TWELVE MAPS YESTERDAY’S CLASSICS CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA Cover and arrangement © 2006 Yesterday’s Classics. This edition, first published in 2006 by Yesterday’s Classics, is an unabridged republi- cation of the work originally published as A Short Sketch of European History from the Fall of the Roman Empire to the Reformation by Frederick A. Stokes Company in 1920. For a full listing of books published by Yesterday’s Classics, please visit www.yesterdaysclassics.com. Yesterday’s Classics is the publishing arm of the Baldwin Project which presents the complete text of dozens of classic books for children at www.mainlesson.com under the editorship of Lisa M. Ripperton and T. A. Roth. ISBN-10: 1-59915-158-8 ISBN-13: 978-1-59915-158-8 Yesterday’s Classics PO Box 3418 Chapel Hill, NC 27515 CONTENTS I. THE BARBARIANS INVADE THE ROMAN 1 EMPIRE II. THE RISE OF THE FRANKS 10 III. THE BARBARIANS RULE IN ROME 15 IV. THE RISE AND FALL OF JUSTINIAN’S EMPIRE―THE ROLE OF THE EASTERN EMPIRE 21 V. GREGORY THE GREAT LAYS THE FOUNDATION OF PAPAL POWER 27 VI. THE RISE OF MOHAMMEDANISM 32 VII. THE CONQUEST OF SPAIN BY THE ARABS 39 VIII. THE DEFEAT OF THE SARACENS―THE RISE OF THE CAROLINGIANS―THE DONATION OF PEPIN 45 IX. THE REIGN OF CHARLEMAGNE―THE BEGINNING OF THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE 53 X.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Crusades Podcast Presents Reconquista: the Rise of Al-Andalus and the Reconquest of Spain Episode 3 the Battle of 711
    The History of the Crusades Podcast presents Reconquista: The Rise of Al-Andalus and the Reconquest of Spain Episode 3 The Battle of 711 Hello again. Last time we saw a Muslim fighting force under the command of Tariq ibn Zayid leave Tangier and make its way to a place on the southern coast of Spain, which will later be called Gibraltar. When we left the last episode, Tariq had spread his army around the bay which lies adjacent to Gibraltar, while King Roderic had mustered his armies at Cordoba and was heading southwards towards Gibraltar. Now I would absolutely love to take you through a detailed blow-by-blow account of the massively significant battle which is about to take place, but unfortunately I can't. Just like we discovered when looking at the final years of the Visigoths in the last episode, there is an irritating lack of dependable source material about this event. In fact, even to this day, historians aren't able to agree on the rather basic fact of where exactly the battle took place. Most famous battles take their names from the place where the fighting played out, but by the fact that this battle is generally known only as “The Battle of 711”, you can see that even this is unclear. But luckily we do know some facts, and we can make some educated guesses about the rest. So with a huge disclaimer about the accuracy of all of this, here is a rundown of the Battle of 711. Now, as we saw in the last episode, King Roderic’s rise to the throne was opposed by Akhila, who had been promised a hereditary crown following the death of his father.
    [Show full text]
  • The Self-Coronations of Iberian Kings: a Crooked Line
    THE SELF-Coronations OF IBERIAN KINGS: A CROOKED LINE JAUME AURELL UNIVERSIDAD DE NAVARRA SpaIN Date of receipt: 10th of March, 2012 Final date of acceptance: 4th of March, 2014 ABSTRACT This article focuses on the practice of self-coronation among medieval Iberian Castilian kings and its religious, political, and ideological implications. The article takes Alfonso XI of Castile self-coronation (1332) as a central event, and establishes a conceptual genealogy, significance, and relevance of this self-coronation, taking Visigothic, Asturian, Leonese, and Castilian chronicles as a main source, and applying political theology as a methodology. The gesture of self-coronation has an evident transgressive connotation which deserves particular attention, and could throw some light upon the traditional debate on the supposed “un-sacred” kingship of Castilian kings1. KEY WORDS Coronation, Unction, Castile, Monarchy, Political Theology. CAPITALIA VERBA Coronatio, Unctio, Castella, Monarchia, Theologia politica. IMAGO TEMPORIS. MEDIUM AEVUM, VIII (2014) 151-175. ISSN 1888-3931 151 152 JAUME AURELL 1Historians have always been fascinated by the quest for origins. Alfonso XI of Castile and Peter IV of Aragon’s peculiar and transgressive gestures of self-coronation in the fourteenth century are very familiar to us, narrated in detail as they are in their respective chronicles2. Yet, their ritual transgression makes us wonder why they acted in this way, whether there were any precedents for this particular gesture, and to what extent they were aware of the different rates at which the anointing and coronation ceremonies were introduced into their own kingdoms, in their search for justification of the self-coronation3.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 18 - the Situation in the West After the Fall of Rome
    Church History Lesson 18 - The Situation in the West After the Fall of Rome 1. Introduction - A Crumbling Empire 1.1. In the last session we looked at a number of Christological controversies which embroiled the church, and consequently the Empire, up until the council of Chalcedon in 451. 1.2. As we saw, these controversies involved both the East and the West, but there were of far greater concern in the East than in the West, and the majority of bishops attending the various councils were overwhelmingly from the East. 1.3. Although there were a number of reasons for this, one of the major reasons was the rapidly changing situation in the West. After Rome was sacked for the first time in 410 AD, it sent shockwaves through the whole empire, but especially in the West. Although the Eastern part of the Empire continued in one form or another for over 1,000 years more, the situation in the West was far different. 1.4. Today we will take a brief look at what happened in the West after the first sacking of Rome in 410, and see how this affected life and the church in the West for the next 300 years or so. 2. The Barbarian Invasions 2.1. The events that most affected life and the church in the West were a series of invasions by “barbarian” tribes. 2.2. Obviously the first major invasion was when Alaric and his band of Visigoths, who invaded Italy and sacked Rome in 410. It was the shockwaves from this event that caused Augustine to write his opus City of God.
    [Show full text]
  • The Edictum Theoderici: a Study of a Roman Legal Document from Ostrogothic Italy
    The Edictum Theoderici: A Study of a Roman Legal Document from Ostrogothic Italy By Sean D.W. Lafferty A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto © Copyright by Sean D.W. Lafferty 2010 The Edictum Theoderici: A Study of a Roman Legal Document from Ostrogothic Italy Sean D.W. Lafferty Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto 2010 Abstract This is a study of a Roman legal document of unknown date and debated origin conventionally known as the Edictum Theoderici (ET). Comprised of 154 edicta, or provisions, in addition to a prologue and epilogue, the ET is a significant but largely overlooked document for understanding the institutions of Roman law, legal administration and society in the West from the fourth to early sixth century. The purpose is to situate the text within its proper historical and legal context, to understand better the processes involved in the creation of new law in the post-Roman world, as well as to appreciate how the various social, political and cultural changes associated with the end of the classical world and the beginning of the Middle Ages manifested themselves in the domain of Roman law. It is argued here that the ET was produced by a group of unknown Roman jurisprudents working under the instructions of the Ostrogothic king Theoderic the Great (493-526), and was intended as a guide for settling disputes between the Roman and Ostrogothic inhabitants of Italy. A study of its contents in relation to earlier Roman law and legal custom preserved in imperial decrees and juristic commentaries offers a revealing glimpse into how, and to what extent, Roman law survived and evolved in Italy following the decline and eventual collapse of imperial authority in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crossing of the Danube and the Gothic Conversion , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:3 (1986:Autumn) P.289
    HEATHER, PETER, The Crossing of the Danube and the Gothic Conversion , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:3 (1986:Autumn) p.289 The Crossing of the Danube and the Gothic Conversion Peter Heather MMIANUS MARCELLINUS provides a detailed account of the re­ A lations between the Emperor Valens and the Goths during the period 367-378. But essentially because Ammianus does not mention it, there has been much controversy over the date of a Gothic conversion to Christianity ascribed in other sources to the reign of Valens. Equally, because the historians Socrates and So­ zomen link a civil war among the Goths to the conversion, it has also been unclear when this split might have taken place. It will be argued here that the primary accounts found in Socrates, Sozomen, and Eunapius can be reconciled with the secondary ones of Jordanes, Theodoret, and Orosius to suggest a Gothic conversion in 376. Fur­ ther, combined with Ammianus, they strongly indicate that Christian­ ity initially affected only elements of one Gothic group, the Tervingi, and was part of the agreement by which Valens allowed them to cross the Danube and enter the Empire in 376. It also becomes clear that the split too affected only the Tervingi, and occurred immediately before the crossing and conversion. This reconstruction in turn highlights the Huns' role in overturning the established order in Gothic society: their attacks first divided the Tervingi, who were unable to agree on an appropriate response, and prompted the larger group to seek asylum in the Empire and accept conversion to Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Roman Empire
    EDITIONLAUSANNE Limited to one tbousand registered sets N0.4'7 THE DECLINEAND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE VOL. I1 THE HISTORY OF THE DECLINE AND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE BY EDWARD GIBBON EDITED BY J. B. BURY, M.A. WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY THE RT. HON. W. E. H. LECKY VOL. I1 NEW YORK FRED DE FAU & COMPANY PUBLISHERS COPYRIGHT,I+, FRED DE FAU & COMPANY. CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME PACE... LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS......... xu1 CHAPTER X The Emperors Decks. Gallus. Amilianus. Valerian. and Galliersur - The General Irruption of the Barbarians - The Thirty Tyrads A.D. 248-268 The Nature of the Subject .......i The Emperor Philip .........a 249 Services.Revolt. Victory. and Reign of the Emperor Decius . a 250 He marchesagainst the Goths ......3 Origin of the Goths from Scandinavia .....4 Religion of the Goths ........5 Institutions and Death of Odin .......6 Agreeable. but uncertainHypothesis concerning Odin . 6 Emigration of the Goths fromScandinavia into Prussia . 7 -from Prussia to theUkraine ...... 8 The Gothic Nation increases in its March .... 9 Distinction of the Germans and Sarmatians ....10 Description ofUkraine the ......10 The Goths invade the Roman Provinces .....11 250 Various Events of the Gothic War ... ..12 251 Decius revives the ofice of Censor in the Person of Valerian . 14 The Design Impracticable. and without Effect ....15 Defeat and Death of Decius and his Son .....16 251 Election of Gallus .........IS 252 Retreat of the Goths ....... 18 gallus purchases Peace by the Payment of an annual Tnbut; 18 Popular Discontent .........19 253 Victory and Revolt of Ahilianus ......20 Gallus abandoned and slain .......20 Valerian revenges the Death of Gallus .....21 Is acknowledged Emperor ........21 'i Character of Valerian ....
    [Show full text]