DOCSLIB.ORG

Identity Against Totality: the Counterdiscourse of Separation Beyond the Decolonial Turn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Identity Against Totality: the Counterdiscourse of Separation Beyond the Decolonial Turn Identity against Totality: the Counterdiscourse of Separation beyond the Decolonial Turn By George Joseph Ciccariello Maher IV A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Wendy Brown, Chair Professor Mark Bevir Professor Kiren Chaudhry Professor Pheng Cheah Profressor Nelson Maldonado-Torres Spring 2010 Abstract Identity against Totality: the Counterdiscourse of Separation beyond the Decolonial Turn by George Joseph Ciccariello Maher IV Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Wendy Brown, Chair This project examines the question of identity-production in the work of French syndicalist Georges Sorel, black psychiatrist-turned-revolutionary Frantz Fanon, and exiled Argentinean philosopher of liberation Enrique Dussel. Against predominant philosophical claims of universality and totality and their practical counterparts in the politics of unity and essentialist understandings of identity, I seek to excavate in these thinkers a counterdiscourse which privileges both the centrality of the moment of rupture and conflict in generating and consolidating political identities, as well as the broader process within which this rupture is situated. To do this, I turn first to Sorel’s analysis of class, a markedly non-orthodox account which rejects both the class essentialism Sorel perceived in some contemporary Marxists as well as the politics of unity that such Marxists frequently advocated. Instead, Sorel proposes a politics geared toward the construction of an absolute class identity, forged through conflict, as the first step in his reformulated Marxist dialectic. I then turn to Fanon, for whom the relevant identities—first race and later nation—differ from those of Sorel, but in whose work we can nevertheless perceive a structural similarity. Both race and nation are, in Fanon’s thought, explicitly non-essentialist concepts which rather than merely existing must be constructed, and this construction occurs, as it did for Sorel, through a process of rupture and conflict. Finally, in my discussion of Dussel, I turn to popular identity, or “the people,” demonstrating that in contrast to some prevailing caricatures, many formulations of the concept of the people in contemporary Latin America are neither totalizing nor essentializing, but rather represent a conflictual identity which shares much with the model of Sorel and Fanon. However, whereas Sorel and Fanon framed their discussions in explicitly dialectical terms (albeit heavily reformulated dialectics), I analyze Dussel’s fusion of dialectics with an “analectics” inspired by Emmanuel Levinas, a fusion which embeds itself at the heart of his concept of the people as an alliance of the excluded and the oppressed. ~ 1 ~ Table of Contents Introduction – The Counterdiscourse of Separation 1 Chapter 1 – The Origins of Anti-Jacobin Myth: Sorel’s Trial of Socrates 19 Chapter 2 – Proletarian Violence against Jacobin Force: Sorel’s Reflections on Violence 45 Chapter 3 – Rebuffed from the Universal: Fanon’s Black Skin, White Masks 73 Chapter 4 – Separation beyond the Decolonial Turn: Fanon’s Wretched of the Earth 100 Chapter 5 – Exteriority against Totality: Dussel’s Philosophy of Liberation 128 Chapter 6 – The People is Not One: Dussel’s Twenty Theses on Politics 148 Conclusion – Toward an Anti-Jacobin Dialectics 173 ~ i ~ Introduction – The Counterdiscourse of Separation If there was single point of inflection at which the discursive shift from the “Bush years” to this newly birthed “age of Obama” began in earnest, gaining a certain degree of irreversibility, this was certainly Barack Obama’s 2004 speech to the Democratic National Convention. And if there was a moment which cemented not only Obama’s potential electability, but which also structured the parameters for his future mode of governance, it came four years later, in his 2008 “race speech,” suggestively titled “A More Perfect Union.”1 The 2004 speech which catapulted him to national fame as the chosen hope of party and nation rested largely on the oft-repeated claim that: “There is no white America. There is no black America. There is no Latino America. There is no Asian America. There is only the United States of America.” In the midst of the 2008 electoral campaign, Obama would be forced to concretize this vision, distinguishing it from that of Reverend Jeremiah Wright in an effort to calm public concerns over his true intentions. Against those would see him as sharing in Wright’s divisiveness, Obama insisted, his is instead a “message of unity,” but one which emerges dialectically through speech and the airing of discontents rather than through the flat, organic unity of silence that had prevailed with regard to race in other moments. Yes, there is and was racism and—in close correlation—poverty, but we nevertheless move inevitably toward “a more perfect union.” Obama thereby accomplishes a seemingly-paradoxical task: holding up and displaying the effects of racism, while ultimately washing the nation clean. It is precisely this which Glen Ford refers to as playing the “race, but not really, card,” whereby Obama appealed to blackness and not-blackness—alterity and sameness—in a way which made his path toward political unity infinitely more complex and effective than the brusque racism and nativism of his predecessor.2 The anger prevailing on both sides of the racial divide (and notably, not merely that of the victims) is understandable, but ultimately “counterproductive,” and rather than focus on that anger (or even its causes), black Americans must bind their “particular grievances… to the larger aspirations of all Americans.”3 “We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict,” or… Or? Here rhetoric inundates argument, and we are left with the optimistic gesture of Hegelian synthesis contained within the very title of the speech, at the intersection of “union” 1 This was also, not coincidentally, the theme of the 2009 Gay Pride Parade in San Francisco, whose official organizers represent a similarly assimilationist tendency. 2 Glen Ford, “Obama’s Siren Song: A Knife in Our Hearts,” Counterpunch (June 14th 2007), http://www.counterpunch.org/ford06132007.html. 3 This seemingly-contradictory position also appears in his The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream (New York: Crown, 2006), where he expresses “caution” to those who would see this as a claim about “postracial politics” (137) Instead, according to Obama, we must “see the world on a split screen screen—to maintain in our sights the kind of America that we want while looking squarely at America as it is, to acknowledge the sins of our past and the challenges of the present without becoming trapped in cynicism or despair.” However, such a seemingly-generative view is not borne out in practice, as Obama deploys white privilege— counterintuitively, to say the least—in an effort to oppose a black power approach. Whites can cut themselves off in a way that minorities cannot, and for blacks to protect themselves psychologically is to “surrender—to what has been instead of what might be” (139). “As a result, proposals that solely benefit minorities and dissect Americans into “us” and “them” may generate a few short-term concessions when the costs to whites aren’t too high, but they can’t serve as the basis for the kinds of sustained, broad-based political coalitions needed to transform America” (146). ~ 1 ~ and “perfection”: “This union may never be perfect, but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected.”4 These speeches struck a chord among many, and few would deny that Obama’s subsequent political successes reflect a broadly-felt desire for that discourse of national unity to reassume its position as a reality after eight years of perceived strife and division expressed in the oft-parodied dictum of the George W. Bush administration: “you’re either with us or against us.”5 But it would be worth wondering aloud to what degree the Bush and Obama doctrines constitute fundamentally different approaches to understanding the socio-political life of the United States. We should pose the question as follows: do the Bush and Obama doctrines share political unity as an objective? Here, the answer seems to be clearly an affirmative one, as the antagonism contained within the Bush doctrine of “you’re with us or against us” is aimed precisely at the reassertion of an organic unity which distinguished “good Americans” from “terrorists” and a lesser degree “illegal aliens” (the qualifier “good” rendered necessary by the newly-minted category of “enemy combatant,” itself a discursive-juridical reflection of cases such as that of José Padilla, a U.S. citizen). But while Bush sought to create a certain sort of unity—in another frequently-parodied phrase, he sought to “be a uniter, not a divider”—and while this was devastatingly effective in some senses (especially in the days following September 11th), it eventually failed as a project due to the divisions it cultivated within the very organic national unity it sought to reinforce. Here lies the fundamental complicity between the two projects: Obama appears charged with the task of repairing the broken unity of the nation that Bush had failed to consolidate despite his best efforts, seeking to do so by drawing the lines that distinguish inside from outside in different ways (i.e. the “good war” in Afghanistan versus the “bad war” in Iraq, a different view of the ethnic-cultural content of “true” Americanism, and a more accommodating position vis-à-vis immigration).6 The Bush regime had failed not because it sought to cultivate division and conflict, but because it miscalculated the political effects of the enmity and divisiveness it had cultivated in the course of unification, and Obama was propelled to power by the promise of a new equilibrium, his soothing discourse assuring a wary white electorate that he could be trusted with the mantle of unity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CLR James and the Black Jacobins
    Atlantic Studies Global Currents ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjas20 Unsilencing the Haitian Revolution: C. L. R. James and The Black Jacobins Rachel Douglas To cite this article: Rachel Douglas (2020): Unsilencing the Haitian Revolution: C. L. R. James and TheBlackJacobins , Atlantic Studies, DOI: 10.1080/14788810.2020.1839283 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14788810.2020.1839283 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 19 Nov 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rjas20 ATLANTIC STUDIES https://doi.org/10.1080/14788810.2020.1839283 Unsilencing the Haitian Revolution: C. L. R. James and The Black Jacobins Rachel Douglas French and Comparative Literature, School of Modern Languages and Cultures, University of Glasgow, UK ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Exploring the genesis, transformation and afterlives of The Black Rewriting; Haitian Jacobins, this article follows the revision trail of James’s evolving Revolution; Toussaint interest in Toussaint Louverture. How does James “show” as Louverture; Caribbean; drama versus “tell” as history? Building on Michel-Rolph Trouillot’s theatre/drama; history from below idea of “silencing the past,” this article argues that James engages in an equally active and transitive reverse process of unsilencing the past. James’s own unsilencing of certain negative representations of the Haitian Revolution is evaluated, as is James’s move away from presenting the colonized as passive objects, instead turning them instead into active subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenor Saxophone Mouthpiece When
    MAY 2014 U.K. £3.50 DOWNBEAT.COM MAY 2014 VOLUME 81 / NUMBER 5 President Kevin Maher Publisher Frank Alkyer Editor Bobby Reed Associate Editor Davis Inman Contributing Editors Ed Enright Kathleen Costanza Art Director LoriAnne Nelson Contributing Designer Ara Tirado Bookkeeper Margaret Stevens Circulation Manager Sue Mahal Circulation Assistant Evelyn Oakes ADVERTISING SALES Record Companies & Schools Jennifer Ruban-Gentile 630-941-2030 [email protected] Musical Instruments & East Coast Schools Ritche Deraney 201-445-6260 [email protected] Advertising Sales Associate Pete Fenech 630-941-2030 [email protected] OFFICES 102 N. Haven Road, Elmhurst, IL 60126–2970 630-941-2030 / Fax: 630-941-3210 http://downbeat.com [email protected] CUSTOMER SERVICE 877-904-5299 / [email protected] CONTRIBUTORS Senior Contributors: Michael Bourne, Aaron Cohen, John McDonough Atlanta: Jon Ross; Austin: Kevin Whitehead; Boston: Fred Bouchard, Frank- John Hadley; Chicago: John Corbett, Alain Drouot, Michael Jackson, Peter Margasak, Bill Meyer, Mitch Myers, Paul Natkin, Howard Reich; Denver: Norman Provizer; Indiana: Mark Sheldon; Iowa: Will Smith; Los Angeles: Earl Gibson, Todd Jenkins, Kirk Silsbee, Chris Walker, Joe Woodard; Michigan: John Ephland; Minneapolis: Robin James; Nashville: Bob Doerschuk; New Orleans: Erika Goldring, David Kunian, Jennifer Odell; New York: Alan Bergman, Herb Boyd, Bill Douthart, Ira Gitler, Eugene Gologursky, Norm Harris, D.D. Jackson, Jimmy Katz, Jim Macnie, Ken Micallef, Dan Ouellette, Ted Panken, Richard Seidel, Tom Staudter,
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International
    University Microfilms International Li |26 1.0 Li lit 132 |Z 2 iu tu Uk L<o 12.0 l.l ll£ 1.25 1.4 III 1.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIAL lOICta (ANSI and ISO TEST CHART No 2) University Microfilms Inc 300 N Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages In any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec­ tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand comer and continu­ ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or in black and white paper format.* 4. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or micro­ fiche but lack clarity on xerographic copies made from the microfilm.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Fly Within
    TEXT FLY WITHIN THE BOOK ONLY 00 u<OU_1 68287 co ^ co> OSMANIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARY t*o-* 7 Alt i^- Gall No. / Accession No. Author 0ttSkts "J- . Title /v- 4he f'/* Kt^fa/iie ^rU^ r -*JU" ' This book should be returned on or before the date last marked below. THE REINTERPRETJLTION OF VICTORIAN LITERATURE THE REINTERPRETATION OF VICTORIAN LITERATURE EDITED BY JOSEPH E. BAKER FOR THE VICTORIAN LITERATURE CROUP OF THE MODERN LANGUAGE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS 1950 COPYRIGHT, 1950, BY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON: GEOFFREY CUMBERLEGE, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS AT PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY PREFACE THE Victorian Literature Group of the Modern Language Association of America, at the 1939 meeting in New Or- leans, agreed to put out this volume to further the reinter- pretation of a literature of great significance for us today. The writers of Victorian England first tried* to salvage humane culture for a new world of science, democracy, and industrialism. We owe to them and to Pre-Victorians like the prose Coleridge a revival of Christian thought, a new Classical renaissance (this time Greek rather than Latin), an unprecedented mastery of the facts about nature and man and, indeed, the very conception of "culture" that we take for granted in our education and in our social plan- ning. In that age, a consciousness that human life is subject to constant development, a sense of historicity, first spread throughout the general public, and literature for -The first time showed that intimate integration with its sociafback- ground which marks our modern culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery, Capitalism, and the “Proletariat”
    1 1 The Slave-Machine: Slavery, Capital- ism, and the “Proletariat” in The Black Jacobins and Capital Nick Nesbitt This essay argues that C. L. R. James’s Marxist humanism is inherently inade- quate for describing the distinction and transition between slavery and capitalism. To do so, the essay interrogates James’s famous claim in The Black Jacobins (1938) that the slaves of St. Domingue were “closer to a modern proletariat than any group of workers in existence at the time,” by comparing James’s understand- ing of the concept of proletariat—there and in World Revolution (1937)—with Marx’s various developments of the concept across the three volumes of Capital. This analysis distinguishes James’s political and historicist deployment of the term from Marx’s analytical usage of the notion in his categorial critique of capitalism.In contrast with James’s linear, Marxist-humanist understanding of the passage from slavery to capitalism, Marx himself demarcates a well-defined delineation between these two basic categories, understood in Capital as analytically (as opposed to historically) distinct modes of production.The essay thus concludes by analyzing Marx’s conceptual differentiation of slavery and industrial capitalism in Capital, drawing on Etienne Balibar’s analysis of the concepts of mode of production and transition in Reading Capital (1965). The slaves worked on the land, and, like revolutionary peasants everywhere, they aimed at the extermination of their oppressors. But working and living together in gangs of hundreds on the huge sugar-factories which covered the North Plain, they were closer to a modern proletariat than any group of workers in existence at the time, and the rising was, therefore, a thoroughly prepared and organized mass movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Lorine Niedecker's Personal Library of Books: A
    LORINE NIEDECKER’S PERSONAL LIBRARY OF BOOKS: A BIBLIOGRAPHY Margot Peters Adams, Brooks. The Law of Civilization and Decay. New York: Vintage Books, 1955. Adéma, Marcel. Apollinaire, trans, Denise Folliot. London: Heineman, 1954. Aldington, Hilda Doolittle (H.D.). Heliodora and Other Poems. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1924. Aldington, Richard, ed. The Religion of Beauty: Selections from the Aesthetes. London: Heineman, 1950. Alighieri, Dante. The Divine Comedy. New York: Random House, 1950. Allen, Donald M., ed. The New American Poetry: 1945-1960. New York: Grove Press, 1960. Allen, Glover Morrill. Birds and Their Attributes. New York: Dover, 1962. Alvarez, A. The School of Donne. New York: Mentor, 1967. Anderson, Charles R. Emily Dickinson’s Poetry: Stairway of Surprise. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1960. Anderson, Sherwood. Six Mid-American Chants. Photos by Art Sinsabaugh. Highlands, N.C.: Jargon Press, 1964. Arnett, Willard E. Santayana and the Sense of Beauty. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1957. Arnold, Matthew. Passages from the Prose Writings of Matthew Arnold, ed. William E. Buckler, New York: New York University Press, 1963. Saint Augustine. The Confessions. New York: Pocket Books, n.d. Aurelius, Marcus (Marcus Aelius Aurelius Antoninus). Meditations. London: Dent, 1948. Bacon, Francis. Essays and the New Atlantis, ed. Gordon S. Haight. New York: Van Nostrand, 1942. Basho. The Narrow Road to the Deep North and Other Travel Sketches, trans. Nobuyuki Yuasa. Baltimore: Penguin, 1966. 1 Baudelaire, Charles. Flowers of Evil. New York: New Directions, 1958. Beard, Charles A. & Mary R. Beard. The Rise of American Civilization. New York: Macmillan, 1939. Bell, Margaret. Margaret Fuller: A Biography.
    [Show full text]
  • LSE Review of Books: Book Review: Making the Black Jacobins: C. L. R. James and the Drama of History by Rachel Douglas Page 1 of 3
    LSE Review of Books: Book Review: Making The Black Jacobins: C. L. R. James and the Drama of History by Rachel Douglas Page 1 of 3 Book Review: Making The Black Jacobins: C. L. R. James and the Drama of History by Rachel Douglas In Making The Black Jacobins: C. L. R. James and the Drama of History, Rachel Douglas examines the formation of James’s groundbreaking work on the Haitian Revolution, exploring its genesis, transformations and afterlives through its different texts, stagings and editions. Positioning The Black Jacobins as a ‘palimpsestually multilayered text-network’ formed through processes of rewriting and revision, this book is a welcome addition to scholarship on James and offers a thoughtful approach to the relationship between Marxist theory and historical analysis, writes Scott Timcke. Making The Black Jacobins: C. L. R. James and the Drama of History. Rachel Douglas. Duke University Press. 2019. There are many ways to look at the relationship between Marxist theory and historical analysis. Through ‘telling the story of the actual writing of The Black Jacobins’ (5), Rachel Douglas offers one of the more thoughtful approaches to that relationship in recent years. Her goal is to show how C. L. R. James (1901-89), one of the preeminent social theorists of the twentieth century (see Bridget Brereton 2014), used several theatrical and historiographical iterations to reform his representation of the past. ‘My task has been to trace the process of The Black Jacobins’ own development’, Douglas writes, ‘working out its form of movement and method of change’ (211). This involves comparative readings of four main texts, these being the play text Toussaint Louverture (1936), the first and second editions of The Black Jacobins (1938 and 1963) and a second play text, The Black Jacobins (1967).
    [Show full text]
  • Lorne Bair :: Catalog 21
    LORNE BAIR :: CATALOG 21 1 Lorne Bair Rare Books, ABAA PART 1: AFRICAN-AMERICAN HISTORY & LITERATURE 2621 Daniel Terrace Winchester, Virginia USA 22601 (540) 665-0855 Email: [email protected] Website: www.lornebair.com TERMS All items are offered subject to prior sale. Unless prior arrangements have been made, payment is expected with order and may be made by check, money order, credit card (Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express), or direct transfer of funds (wire transfer or Paypal). Institutions may be billed. Returns will be accepted for any reason within ten days of receipt. ALL ITEMS are guaranteed to be as described. Any restorations, sophistications, or alterations have been noted. Autograph and manuscript material is guaranteed without conditions or restrictions, and may be returned at any time if shown not to be authentic. DOMESTIC SHIPPING is by USPS Priority Mail at the rate of $9.50 for the first item and $3 for each additional item. Overseas shipping will vary depending upon destination and weight; quotations can be supplied. Alternative carriers may be arranged. WE ARE MEMBERS of the ABAA (Antiquarian Bookseller’s Association of America) and ILAB (International League of Antiquarian Book- sellers) and adhere to those organizations’ standards of professionalism and ethics. PART ONE African American History & Literature ITEMS 1-54 PART TWO Radical, Social, & Proletarian Literature ITEMS 55-92 PART THREE Graphics, Posters & Original Art ITEMS 93-150 PART FOUR Social Movements & Radical History ITEMS 151-194 2 PART 1: AFRICAN-AMERICAN HISTORY & LITERATURE 1. CUNARD, Nancy (ed.) Negro Anthology Made by Nancy Cunard 1931-1933. London: Nancy Cunard at Wishart & Co., 1934.
    [Show full text]
  • The Difference Between American Sign Language and Body Language in Greetings
    Multicultural Education Volume 7, Issue 5, 2021 _______________________________________________________________________________________ The Difference Between American Sign Language and Body Language in Greetings Najlaa Hayyawi Abbar,Hasanain Hassan Shaheed Article Info Abstract Article History Permanency durability the non-verbal greetings are these greetings up to expectation work no longer necessity speaking then voice; then it can stay Received: understood by way of whole classes over individuals. Greetings through March 17, 2021 physique gestures are the critical share of non-vocal greetings. They hold been mentioned throughout it delivery note according to dense standards Accepted: about linguists. Moreover, that paper suggests the distinction in gesture or May 14, 2021 signal sound of definitive issues. Sign call is distinctive for incapable men and women between their talking yet hard of hearing ones, whilst the usage Keywords : of greetings by way of gestures is because every concerning the regular then Gesture, American Sign broken people. So, we perform speech so greetings via gestures are normal Language, Body word as that has been proven of it paper. Language DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4763144 Introduction Permanency durability stability permanency stability The fact to that amount languages are not solely objectives, socially neutral units for conveying meaning, however are attached over including identities and ethnic businesses grudging consequences for the associative assessment of, or the attitudes in the direction of languages, of a tribe conventional (or ethnic) agencies hold certain attitudes in the direction of each other, pertaining to after theirs differing associative positions. Greeting including gestures is some regarding these attitudes. (Thomas,1995:47). Gestures are no longer simply actions and can in no way stay totally defined in merely kinesics terms.
    [Show full text]
  • 'A Very Hell of Horrors'? the Haitian Revolution and the Early Transatlantic Haitian Gothic Raphael Hoermann Published Onlin
    Article ‘A Very Hell of Horrors’? The Haitian Revolution and the Early Transatlantic Haitian Gothic Hoermann, Raphael Available at http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/13535/ Hoermann, Raphael ORCID: 0000-0001-6156-8431 (2015) ‘A Very Hell of Horrors’? The Haitian Revolution and the Early Transatlantic Haitian Gothic. Slavery & Abolition: A journal of slave and post-slave studies, 37 (1). pp. 183- 205. ISSN 0144-039X It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144039X.2015.1086083 For more information about UCLan’s research in this area go to http://www.uclan.ac.uk/researchgroups/ and search for <name of research Group>. For information about Research generally at UCLan please go to http://www.uclan.ac.uk/research/ All outputs in CLoK are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including Copyright law. Copyright, IPR and Moral Rights for the works on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the policies page. CLoK Central Lancashire online Knowledge www.clok.uclan.ac.uk ‘A Very Hell of Horrors’? The Haitian Revolution and the Early Transatlantic Haitian Gothic Raphael Hoermann Ascription: Raphael Hoermann is the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellow at the Institute of Black Atlantic Research, School of Language, Literature and International Studies, University of Central Lancashire, Harrington 248, Preston PR1 2HE, U.K. Email: [email protected] Published online (24/9/2015) in Slavery & Abolition: A Journal of Slave and Post-Slave Studies http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144039X.2015.1086083 1 Abstract: This article explores the Gothicisation of the Haitian Revolution in the transatlantic discourse during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Printing New York City Cowboys
    New York City Cowboys Written by J. J. Schamus Copyright (c) 2015 This screenplay may not be used or reproduced without the express written permission of the author. WGAW Registered 2015 Final Draft "NEW YORK CITY COWBOYS" FADE IN: EXT. CORRAL - DAY A hot, dusty day under a bright blue sky. A teen aged cowboy, DUKE Schamus, is standing in the corral. He is good looking but not pretty, with muscular build and broad shoulders. He speaks with a soft western drawl. Duke stands with a scowl on his face. An ivory handled Colt Peacemaker sits in a holster on his hip. Duke loosens the pistol in its holster, cracks his knuckles and turns his head in a circle to loosen his neck. He nods his head. DUKE You ready? A man, MONTE Bluefeather, is standing in the same corral. He is tall, over six feet and powerful looking. He has a dusky complexion and features that show he's part Native American. Monte also has a Colt in a holster on his hip. There's a scowl on his face and his thumbs are hooked in his belt. He nods. MONTE Ready. The two aren't facing each other but a fence rail twenty feet away with two sets of six assorted bottles and cans lined up on top. DUKE On three. One... two... three! They quickly draw and each fire SIX SHOTS, emptying their Colts at the targets on the fence rail. The cloud of smoke disperses in the light breeze. Duke has hit five out of six targets.
    [Show full text]
  • John Ahouse-Upton Sinclair Collection, 1895-2014
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8cn764d No online items INVENTORY OF THE JOHN AHOUSE-UPTON SINCLAIR COLLECTION, 1895-2014, Finding aid prepared by Greg Williams California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives & Special Collections University Library, Room 5039 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3895 URL: http://www.csudh.edu/archives/csudh/index.html ©2014 INVENTORY OF THE JOHN "Consult repository." 1 AHOUSE-UPTON SINCLAIR COLLECTION, 1895-2014, Descriptive Summary Title: John Ahouse-Upton Sinclair Collection Dates: 1895-2014 Collection Number: "Consult repository." Collector: Ahouse, John B. Extent: 12 linear feet, 400 books Repository: California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives and Special Collections Archives & Special Collection University Library, Room 5039 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3013 URL: http://www.csudh.edu/archives/csudh/index.html Abstract: This collection consists of 400 books, 12 linear feet of archival items and resource material about Upton Sinclair collected by bibliographer John Ahouse, author of Upton Sinclair, A Descriptive Annotated Bibliography . Included are Upton Sinclair books, pamphlets, newspaper articles, publications, circular letters, manuscripts, and a few personal letters. Also included are a wide variety of subject files, scholarly or popular articles about Sinclair, videos, recordings, and manuscripts for Sinclair biographies. Included are Upton Sinclair’s A Monthly Magazine, EPIC Newspapers and the Upton Sinclair Quarterly Newsletters. Language: Collection material is primarily in English Access There are no access restrictions on this collection. Publication Rights All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Director of Archives and Special Collections.
    [Show full text]