DOCSLIB.ORG

The Articulatory Basis of Locality in Phonology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Articulatory Basis of Locality in Phonology Bibliography Abbs, J. 1986. Invariance and Variability in Speech Production: A Distinction Between Linguistic Intent and its Neuromotor Implementation. In Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes, ed. J. Perkell and D. Klatt, 202-219. Hillsdale, N.Y.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Abercrombie, D. 1957. Direct Palatography. Zeitschrift für Phonetik 10: 21-25. Allen, W. 1951. Some Prosodic Aspects of Retroflexion and Aspiration in Sanskrit. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies13: 939- 946. Allen, W. 1953. Phonetics in Ancient India. London: Oxford University Press. Anderson, J., and C. Ewen. 1987. Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Anderson, S. 1981. Why Phonology Isn’t Natural. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 493-539. Archangeli, D. 1985. Yokuts Harmony: Evidence for Coplanar Representation in Nonlinear Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 335-372. Archangeli, D. 1991. Syllabification and Prosodic Templates in Yawelmani. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 231-283. Archangeli, D., and D. Pulleyblank. 1986. The Content and Structure of Phonological Representations. Ms., University of Arizona, Tuscon, Ariz., and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. Archangeli, D., and D. Pulleyblank. 1987. Maximal and Minimal Rules: Effects of Tier Scansion. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 17, 16-35. Archangeli, D., and D. Pulleyblank. 1994. Grounded Phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Aronoff, M. 1994. Morphology by Itself, Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Bach, E., and R. Harms. 1972. How do Languages Get Crazy Rules? In Linguistic Change and Generative Theory, ed. R. Stockwell, and R. Macaulay, 245 246 The Articulatory Basis of Locality in Phonology 1-21. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Barry, M. 1991. Temporal Modelling of Gestures in Articulatory Assimilation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Phonetic Scences, 14- 17. Bat-El, O. 1994. Stem Modification and Cluster Transfer in Modern Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Inquiry 12: 571-596. Beeler, M. 1970. Sibilant Harmony in Chumash. International Journal of American Linguistics 36: 14-17. Benjamin, G. 1976. An Outline of Temiar Grammar. In Austroasiatic Studies, Vol. II, ed. P. Jenner, L. Thompson, and S. Starosta, 129-187. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. Benua, L. 1995. Identity Effects in Morphological Truncation. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass. Berkley, D. 1994. The OCP and Gradient Data. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 24: 1-14. Best, C., and H. Queen. 1989. Baby, It’s inYour Smile: Right Hemiface Bias in Infant Emotional Expressions. Developmental Psychology 25: 264-276. Bittle, W. 1963. Kiowa-Apache. In University of California Publications in Linguistics 29, 76-101. Berkeley: University of California Press. Bladon, R., and F. Nolan. 1977. A Video-Fluorographic Investigation of Tip and Blade Alveolars in English. Journal of Phonetics 5: 185-193. Bloch, J. 1914. La Formation de la Langue Marathe. Paris. Borden, G., and T. Gay. 1978. On the Production of Low Tongue Tip /s/: A Case Report. Journal of Communication Disorders 11: 425-431. Boyce, S. 1988. The Influence of Phonological Structure on Articulatory Organization in Turkish and in English: Vowel Harmony and Coarticulation. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. Boyce, S. 1990. Coarticulatory Organization for Lip Rounding in Turkish and English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88: 2584-95. Bright, W. 1978. Sibilants and Naturalness in Aboriginal California. Journal of California Anthropology, Papers in Linguistics 1: 39-63. Broselow, E., and J. McCarthy. 1983. A Theory of Infixing Reduplication. The Linguistic Review 3: 25-98. Browman, C., and L. Goldstein. 1986. Towards an Articulatory Phonology. Phonology 3: 219-252. Browman, C., and L. Goldstein. 1988. Some Notes on Syllable Structure in Articulatory Phonology. Phonetica 45: 140-155. Bibliography 247 Browman, C., and L. Goldstein. 1989. Articulatory Gestures as Phonological Units. Phonology 6: 201-251. Browman, C., and L. Goldstein. 1990a. Tiers in Articulatory Phonology, with some Implications for Casual Speech. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech, ed. J. Kingston and M. Beckman, 341-397. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Browman, C., and L. Goldstein. 1990b. Gestural Specification Using Dynamically-Defined Articulatory Gestures. Journal of Phonetics 18: 299-320. Browman, C., and L. Goldstein. 1991a. Gestural Structures: Distinctiveness, Phonological Processes, and Historical Change. In Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception, ed. I.G. Mattingly and M. Studdert- Kennedy, 313-338. Hillsdale, N.Y.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Browman, C. and L. Goldstein. 1991b. Gestural Syllable Position Effects in American English. In Producing Speech, ed. F. Bell-Berti and L. Raphael, 19-33. London: Academic Press. Browman, C., and L. Goldstein. 1992a. Articulatory Phonology: An Overview. Phonetica 49: 153-180. Browman, C., and L. Goldstein. 1992b. ‘Targetless’ Schwa: An Articulatory Analysis. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, Segment, Prosody, ed. G. Docherty and R. Ladd , 26-56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Burzio, L. 1994. Principles of English Stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carey, I. 1976. Orang Asli. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press. Catford, J. 1977. Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Carney, P., and K. Moll. 1971. A Cineflourographic Investigation of Fricative Consonant-Vowel Coarticulation. Phonetica 23: 193-202. Carré, R., and M. Mrayati. 1990. Articulatory-Acoustic-Phonetic Relations and Modelling, Regions and Modes. In Speech Production and Speech Modelling, ed. W. Hardcastle and A. Marchal, 211-240. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Cho, Y. 1991. On the Universality of the Coronal Articulator. In Phonetics and Phonology 2, The Special Status of Coronals: Internal and External Evidence, ed. C. Paradis and J.-F. Prunet, 159-180. London: Academic Press. Chomsky, N., and M. Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: 248 The Articulatory Basis of Locality in Phonology Harper and Row. Clark, J., and C. Yallop. 1990. An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd. Clements, N. 1977. Neutral Vowels in Hungarian Vowel Harmony: an Autosegmental Interpretation. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 7, 49-64. Clements, N. 1985. The Geometry of Phonological Features. Phonology Yearbook 2: 225-252. Clements, N. 1989. A Unified Set of Features for Consonants and Vowels. Ms., Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. Clements, N. 1991a. Place of Articulation in Consonants and Vowels: A Unified Theory. In Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 5, 77- 123. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. Clements, N. 1991b. Vowel Height Assimilation in Bantu Languages. In Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 5, 37-76. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. Clements, N. 1992. Phonological Primes: Features or Gestures? Phonetica 49: 181-193. Clements, N. and E. Hume. 1995. The Internal Organization of Speech Sounds. In Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. J. Goldsmith, 245-306. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers. Cohn, A., and J. McCarthy. 1994. Alignment and Parallelism in Indonesian Phonology. Ms., Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., and University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass. World Wide Web: Rutgers Optimality Archive (ROA)-25. Cole, J. 1991. Planar Phonology and Morphology. New York: Garland Publishing. Cole, J., and C. Kisseberth. 1994. An Optimal Domains Theory of Harmony. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 24:1-13. Comrie, B. 1981. The Languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cook, E.-D. 1983. Chilcotin Flattening. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 28:123-132. Cook. E.-D. 1987. An Autosegmental Analysis of Chilcotin Flattening. In Papers from the 23rd Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part Two: Parassesion on Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology, 51-65. Chicago: Ch icago Linguistic Society. Cook, E.-D. 1993. Chilcotin Flattening and Autosegmental Phonology. Lingua 91: 149-174. Cook, E.-D., and K. Rice, ed. 1989. Introduction. Athapaskan Linguistics: Bibliography 249 Current Perspectives on a Language Family, 1-62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Dart, S. 1991. Articulatory and Acoustic Properties of Apical and Laminal Articulations. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 79, 1-155. Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif. Dart, S. 1993. Phonetic Properties of O’Odham Stop and Fricative Contrasts. International Journal of Americal Linguistics 59 : 16-37. Diffloth, G. 1972. Notes on Expressive Meaning. In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 440-447. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. Diffloth, G. 1976a. Minor Syllable Vocalism in Senoic Languages. In Austroasiatic Studies, Vol II, ed. P. Jenner, L. Thompson, and S. Starosta, 229-247. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. Diffloth, G. 1976b. Expressives in Semai. In Austroasiatic Studies, Vol II, ed. P. Jenner, L. Thompson, and S. Starosta, 249-264. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. Diffloth, G. 1976c. Jah-Hut, an Austroasiatic Language of Malaysia. Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies 2: 73-118. Disner, S. 1983. Vowel
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Studies on Language Change. Working Papers in Linguistics No. 34
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 286 382 FL 016 932 AUTHOR Joseph, Brian D., Ed. TITLE Studies on Language Change. Working Papers in Linguistics No. 34. INSTITUTION Ohio State Univ., Columbus. Dept. of Linguistics. PUB DATE Dec 86 NOTE 171p. PUB TYPE Reports - Evaluative/Feasibility (142) -- Collected Works - General (020) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Arabic; Diachronic Linguistics; Dialects; *Diglossia; English; Estonian; *Etymology; Finnish; Foreign Countries; Language Variation; Linguistic Borrowing; *Linguistic Theory; *Morphemes; *Morphology (Languages); Old English; Sanskrit; Sociolinguistics; Syntax; *Uncommonly Taught Languages; Word Frequency IDENTIFIERS Saame ABSTRACT A collection of papers relevant to historical linguistics and description and explanation of language change includes: "Decliticization and Deaffixation in Saame: Abessive 'taga'" (Joel A. Nevis); "Decliticization in Old Estonian" (Joel A. Nevis); "On Automatic and Simultaneous Syntactic Changes" (Brian D. Joseph); "Loss of Nominal Case Endings in the Modern Arabic Sedentary Dialects" (Ann M. Miller); "One Rule or Many? Sanskrit Reduplication as Fragmented Affixation" (Richard D. Janda, Brian D. Joseph); "Fragmentation of Strong Verb Ablaut in Old English" (Keith Johnson); "The Etymology of 'bum': Mere Child's Play" (Mary E. Clark, Brian D. Joseph); "Small Group Lexical Innovation: Some Examples" (Christopher Kupec); "Word Frequency and Dialect Borrowing" (Debra A. Stollenwerk); "Introspection into a Stable Case of Variation in Finnish" (Riitta Valimaa-Blum);
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Locality Domains in Phonology∗
    The Power of Locality Domains in Phonology∗ Thomas Graf Stony Brook University Abstract Domains play an integral role in linguistic theories. This paper com- bines locality domains with current work on the computational complex- ity of phonology. The first result is that if a specific formalism — Strictly Piecewise (SP) grammars — is supplemented with a mechanism to enforce first-order definable domain restrictions, its power increases so much that it subsumes almost the full hierarchy of subregular languages. However, if domain restrictions are based on linguistically natural intervals, one in- stead obtains an empirically more adequate model. On the on hand, this model subsumes only those subregular classes that have been argued to be relevant for phonotactic generalizations. On the other hand, it excludes unnatural generalizations that involve counting or elaborate conditionals. It is also shown that SP grammars with interval-based domains are theo- retically learnable unlike SP grammars with arbitrary, first-order domains. Keywords: locality, phonological domains, first-order logic, tiers, sub- regular hierarchy, strictly piecewise, learnability 1 Introduction It has been known for a long time that the phonological systems of natural lan- guages are finite-state in nature and thus generate regular languages (Johnson 1972; Kaplan and Kay 1994). However, this characterization is insufficent in the sense that phonological dependencies instantiate much simpler patterns — the ∗I am greatly indebted to two anonymous reviewers and the editors of this issue. Their de- tailed feedback led to major changes that, hopefully, have resulted in a much more accessible and phonologically grounded paper. This paper has also profited tremendously from regular discussions of subregular phonology with Alëna Aksënova, Hyunah Baek, Aniello De Santo, and Chikako Takahashi.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Phonology in Lexicography: Variant-Synonym Classification In
    Applying phonology in lexicography: variant-synonym classification in Czech Sign Language Hana Strachoňová, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, [email protected] Lucia Vlášková, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, [email protected] Sign language (SL) lexicography, as a young field of study within SL linguistics, faces a lot of challenges that have already been answered for the audio-oral language material. In this talk we present a method that is being applied in the ongoing process of data classification for the first Czech SL online dictionary (part of the platform Dictio). Problem: For audio-oral languages, a dictionary entry standardly contains the citation form of a lexeme and all the variants (Čermák 1995). See for example the gender variants in Czech: brambor (potato- masculine) / brambor-a (potato-feminine), hadr (cloth-masculine) / hadr-a (cloth-feminine). However, two (or more) expressions of a different word-forming nature are not considered variants but synonyms (Filipec 1995). See the example pairs in Czech - the first expression comes from the traditional Czech lexicon and the latter originates in English/Latin: jazykověda (linguistics; Czech origin) / lingvistika (linguistics; foreign origin), poradce (consultant; Czech origin) / konzultant (consultant; foreign origin). The common ground of the variant- and synonym-pairs is their shared meaning (brambor has the same meaning as brambora; jazykověda has the same meaning as lingvistika) and in the lexicographic work it is essential to assign each of them the right place in the dictionary entry. What seems as a simple task for spoken languages (basically - common root for variants, different roots for synonyms) becomes a challenge for SLs (still ongoing discussion about the definition of morphemes and lexical roots; see e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Development Language Development
    Language Development rom their very first cries, human beings communicate with the world around them. Infants communicate through sounds (crying and cooing) and through body lan- guage (pointing and other gestures). However, sometime between 8 and 18 months Fof age, a major developmental milestone occurs when infants begin to use words to speak. Words are symbolic representations; that is, when a child says “table,” we understand that the word represents the object. Language can be defined as a system of symbols that is used to communicate. Although language is used to communicate with others, we may also talk to ourselves and use words in our thinking. The words we use can influence the way we think about and understand our experiences. After defining some basic aspects of language that we use throughout the chapter, we describe some of the theories that are used to explain the amazing process by which we Language9 A system of understand and produce language. We then look at the brain’s role in processing and pro- symbols that is used to ducing language. After a description of the stages of language development—from a baby’s communicate with others or first cries through the slang used by teenagers—we look at the topic of bilingualism. We in our thinking. examine how learning to speak more than one language affects a child’s language develop- ment and how our educational system is trying to accommodate the increasing number of bilingual children in the classroom. Finally, we end the chapter with information about disorders that can interfere with children’s language development.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Model of Cognitive Constraints in Syntactic Locality
    A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF COGNITIVE CONSTRAINTS IN SYNTACTIC LOCALITY A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Marisa Ferrara Boston January 2012 c 2012 Marisa Ferrara Boston ALL RIGHTS RESERVED A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF COGNITIVE CONSTRAINTS IN SYNTACTIC LOCALITY Marisa Ferrara Boston, Ph.D. Cornell University 2012 This dissertation is broadly concerned with the question: how do human cognitive limitations influence difficult sentences? The focus is a class of grammatical restrictions, locality con- straints. The majority of relations between words are local; the relations between question words and their governors are not. Locality constraints restrict the formation of these non-local dependencies. Though necessary, the origin, operation, and scope of locality constraints is a controversial topic in the literature. The dissertation describes the implementation of a computational model that clarifies these issues. The model tests, against behavioral data, a series of cognitive constraints argued to account for locality. The result is an explanatory model predictive of a variety of cross-linguistic locality data. The model distinguishes those cognitive limitations that affect locality processing, and addresses the competence-performance debate by determining how and when cognitive constraints explain human behavior. The results provide insight into the nature of locality constraints, and promote language models sensitive to human cognitive limitations. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Marisa Ferrara Boston (nee´ Marisa Angela Ferrara) was born January 26, 1981 in Painesville, Ohio. She received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Individualized Studies from Eastern Michigan University in 2001, and a Master of Arts degree in English Linguistics from Eastern Michigan University in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonetic and Phonological Research Sharing Methods
    The Kabod Volume 3 Issue 3 Summer Article 1 January 2017 Phonetic and Phonological Research Sharing Methods Cory C. Coogan Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/kabod Part of the Modern Languages Commons, and the Reading and Language Commons Recommended Citations MLA: Coogan, Cory C. "Phonetic and Phonological Research Sharing Methods," The Kabod 3. 3 (2017) Article 1. Liberty University Digital Commons. Web. [xx Month xxxx]. APA: Coogan, Cory C. (2017) "Phonetic and Phonological Research Sharing Methods" The Kabod 3( 3 (2017)), Article 1. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/kabod/vol3/iss3/1 Turabian: Coogan, Cory C. "Phonetic and Phonological Research Sharing Methods" The Kabod 3 , no. 3 2017 (2017) Accessed [Month x, xxxx]. Liberty University Digital Commons. This Individual Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Kabod by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Coogan: Phonetic and Phonological Research Sharing Methods Running Head: PHONETIC AND PHONOLOGICAL RESEARCH SHARING METHODS 1 Phonetic and Phonological Research Sharing Methods Cory Coogan Liberty University Published by Scholars Crossing, 2017 1 The Kabod, Vol. 3, Iss. 3 [2017], Art. 1 PHONETIC AND PHONOLOGICAL RESEARCH SHARING METHODS 2 Phonetic and Phonological Research Sharing Methods Most linguists affirm the observation that human language is innate; the human mind has a capacity for grammar that is inherent from birth. This notion implies that a singular grammar produces all human languages; therefore, to appropriately understand the scope of the human capacity for grammar, a single model must cohesively describe the various processes of all human languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American and Indigenous Philosophy
    NEWSLETTER | The American Philosophical Association Native American and Indigenous Philosophy SPRING 2020 VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 2 FROM THE MANAGING EDITOR Agnes B. Curry SUBMISSION GUIDELINES AND INFORMATION ARTICLE Andrea Sullivan-Clarke Empowering Relations: An Indigenous Understanding of Allyship BOOK REVIEWS Brian Burkhart: Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land: A Trickster Methodology for Decolonizing Environmental Ethics and Indigenous Futures Reviewed by Joseph Len Miller Indigenous Philosophy, Locality, and Dance: A Joint Review of Shay Welch, The Phenomenology of a Performance Knowledge System: Dancing with Native American Epistemology, and Brian Burkhart, Indigenizing Philosophy through the Land: A Trickster Methodology for Decolonizing Environmental Ethics and Indigenous Futures Reviewed by Dennis H. McPherson and J. Douglas Rabb Shay Welch: The Phenomenology of a Performance Knowledge System: Dancing with Native American Epistemology Reviewed by Lorraine Mayer VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 2 SPRING 2020 © 2020 BY THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION ISSN 2155-9708 APA NEWSLETTER ON Native American and Indigenous Philosophy AGNES B. CURRY, EDITOR VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 2 | SPRING 2020 FROM THE MANAGING EDITOR SUBMISSION GUIDELINES AND Agnes B. Curry INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOSEPH, CONNECTICUT We invite you to submit your work for consideration for In this newsletter we offer first an article by Andrea Sullivan- publication in the Newsletter on Native American and Clarke of Windsor University in Canada. In “Empowering Indigenous Philosophy. We welcome comments and Relations” she critically considers recent discussions responses to work published in this or past issues. We also of allyship and the limitations inherent in them, so as to welcome work that speaks to philosophical, professional build a less ethically naïve concept for allying work with and community concerns regarding Native American and indigenous peoples and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Locality Constraints It Is Instructive to Compare Overt Movement Like Wh-Movement and QR, Which Is a Type of Covert Movement
    PLIN3004/PLING218 Advanced Semantic Theory Lecture Notes: Week 10 Quantifiers sometimes take scope in places different from where they appear on the surface. One such case is the inverse scope reading of (1), which we discussed in Lecture 9. (1) Someone likes everyone. This shows that the scope of a quantifier is not completely determined by the surface form of the sentence. However, at the same time, it is known that quantifier scope is quite constrained in natural language. In order to understand such constraints, we adopt here the hypothesis that quantifier scope is determined by the covert movement operation Quantifier Raising (QR), and constraints on quantifier scope are constraints on QR. As we will see, the discussion is largely open-ended, but it is clear that there are some peculiar properties of quantifier scope in natural languages that we need to explain. 1 Locality Constraints It is instructive to compare overt movement like wh-movement and QR, which is a type of covert movement. As you have learned in syntax modules, wh-movement is known to be subject to a number of locality constraints known as island constraints. Here are two examples of island constraints: (2) Complex NP Island *Which novel did somebody meet a man that has read t? (3) Coordinate Structure Island *Which novel did somebody [read t and watched TV] before going to bed? Interestingly, quantifier scope seems to be subject to these constraints as well. For example, every novel cannot take scope over somebody in the following examples. (4) Complex NP Island Somebody met a man that has read every novel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Articulatory Basis of Locality in Phonology
    The Articulatory Basis of Locality in Phonology by Adamantios I. Gafos Notes: 1. This dissertation has been published by Garland Publishing, Inc., New York, 1999. 2. Copyright © 1999 Adamantios I. Gafos. ISBN 0-8153-3286-6 3. How to navigate through this document. The entire dissertation is comprised of 8 separate pdf files broken into chapters, bibliography and index for the benefit of users who have a slow internet connection. Hyperlinks to each chapter (Chapter 1, 2, 3, etc.), bibliography and index are found in the Contents (Table of Contents) page of this file. The hyperlinks are high-lighted with either a magenta or blue colored text. A hyperlink ( ) located on the upper right- hand corner of Page 1 of each chapter links that chapter back to this page. Dedication to my parents, Ioannis and Ioanna and to my sisters, Anthippi and Ioulia v vi Contents Preface ....................................................... xi Acknowledgments ............................................. xiii Illustrations ...................................................xv Abbreviations ................................................xvii Chapter 1: Introduction 1. Central Thesis ................................................3 2. Theoretical Background ........................................10 2.1 Gestures in Articulatory Phonology .....................11 2.2 Specific Assumptions ................................16 3. Organization of the Dissertation ................................ 21 Notes ........................................................24 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • 24.900 Intro to Linguistics Lecture Notes: Phonology Summary
    Fall 2012 Phonology Summary • Speakers of English learned something from the data they were presented with as (contains all examples from class slides, and more!) babies that caused them to internalize (learn) the rule exemplified in (1) — just as Tojolabal speakers learned from the data that they heard as babies, and ended up with 1. Phonology vs. phonetics the rule exemplified in (2). • The path from memory (lexical access) to speech is mediated by phonology. • The English rule is real and active "on-line", governing creative linguistic behavior. A • Phonology = system of rules that apply when speech sounds are put together to form native speaker of English will apply it to new words they have never heard. The /t/ in morphemes and words. tib will be aspirated, and the /t/ in stib (both nonsense words, I hope) will not be. Probably Tojolabal speakers will show similar behavior with respect to their rule. (1) stop consonant aspiration in English: initial within a stressed syllable ASPIRATED UNASPIRATED 2. What phonetic distinctions are made in lexical entries? initial within a stressed syllable after s or initial within an word-final (therefore syllable- Part 1: phonological rules that eliminate distinctions from the lexicon unstressed syllable final) pan span nap tone stone note • English: lexicon does not need to distinguish aspirated from unaspirated stops. kin skin nick There is no reason to suppose that information about aspiration forms part of the sound field of lexical entries of English words, since it is entirely predictable. Though pan is upon supping pronounced /pʰæn/ and span /spæn/, there is no reason to distinguish the aspirated and unaspirated bilabial stops in the lexical entries of the two words.
    [Show full text]
  • A Typology of Consonant Agreement As Correspondence
    A TYPOLOGY OF CONSONANT AGREEMENT AS CORRESPONDENCE SHARON ROSE RACHEL WALKER University of California, San Diego University of Southern California This article presents a typology of consonant harmony or LONG DISTANCE CONSONANT AGREEMENT that is analyzed as arisingthroughcorrespondence relations between consonants rather than feature spreading. The model covers a range of agreement patterns (nasal, laryngeal, liquid, coronal, dorsal) and offers several advantages. Similarity of agreeing consonants is central to the typology and is incorporated directly into the constraints drivingcorrespondence. Agreementby correspon- dence without feature spreadingcaptures the neutrality of interveningsegments,which neither block nor undergo. Case studies of laryngeal agreement and nasal agreement are presented, demon- stratingthe model’s capacity to capture varyingdegreesof similarity crosslinguistically.* 1. INTRODUCTION. The action at a distance that is characteristic of CONSONANT HAR- MONIES stands as a pivotal problem to be addressed by phonological theory. Consider the nasal alternations in the Bantu language, Kikongo (Meinhof 1932, Dereau 1955, Webb 1965, Ao 1991, Odden 1994, Piggott 1996). In this language, the voiced stop in the suffix [-idi] in la is realized as [ini] in 1b when preceded by a nasal consonant at any distance in the stem constituent, consistingof root and suffixes. (1) a. m-[bud-idi]stem ‘I hit’ b. tu-[kun-ini]stem ‘we planted’ n-[suk-idi]stem ‘I washed’ tu-[nik-ini]stem ‘we ground’ In addition to the alternation in 1, there are no Kikongo roots containing a nasal followed by a voiced stop, confirmingthat nasal harmony or AGREEMENT, as we term it, also holds at the root level as a MORPHEME STRUCTURE CONSTRAINT (MSC).
    [Show full text]
  • An Optimality-Theoretic Analysis of Navajo Sibilant Harmony
    An optimality-theoretic analysis of Navajo sibilant harmony Item Type text; Article Authors Oberly, Stacey Publisher University of Arizona Linguistics Circle (Tucson, Arizona) Journal Coyote Papers Rights Copyright © is held by the author(s). Download date 01/10/2021 17:26:00 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/126386 An Optimality-Theoretic Analysis of Navajo Sibilant Harmony Stacey Oberly University of Arizona Abstract This paper presents an Optimality-Theoretic analysis (Prince and Smolensky, 1993) of sibilant harmony in Navajo. This Optimality- Theoretic (OT) analysis uses correspondence theory (McCarthy and Prince, 1995) to account for changes in the [ anterior] feature in coro- ± nal segments in the verbal conjunct domain. Specifically, the place of articulation of the rightmost coronal fricative segment determines the place of articulation of all other coronal fricatives in the ver- bal conjunct domain via Ident, Agree and Max constraints. This OT analysis is innovative in that it posits a constraint that protects pronominal-argument morphemes from deletion. 1 Introduction This discussion presents an Optimality Theoretic analysis (Prince and Smo- lensky, 1993) of sibilant harmony in Navajo using correspondence theory. In correspondence theory (McCarthy and Prince, 1995), Gen produces a candidate set with a correspondence function expressing the dependence of the output on the input. Eval considers each candidate pair S1, S2 and its correspondence function. In Navajo, verbs are made up of three parts: the disjunct domain, conjunct domain and verb stem. Coronal fricative segments in the conjunct domain and verb stem must agree in regards to the [anterior] feature.
    [Show full text]