Middlesbrough Council Taxi Rank and Hackney Fleet Review July 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Middlesbrough Council Taxi Rank and Hackney Fleet Review July 2010 MIDDLESBROUGH COUNCIL TAXI RANK AND HACKNEY FLEET REVIEW July 2010 MIDDLESBROUGH COUNCIL TAXI RANK AND HACKNEY FLEET REVIEW JULY 2010 PREPARED BY: Transportation Planning (International) Ltd. Crystal Court Aston Cross Rocky Lane Aston Birmingham B6 5RH Tel No: 0121 333 3433 Fax No: 0121 359 3200 Email: [email protected] This report is for the sole use of Middlesbrough Council for whom the proposal has been undertaken. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part or relied upon by any third party for any use whatsoever without the express written authority of Transportation Planning (International) Limited. Transportation Planning (International) Limited accepts no duty or responsibility (including in negligence) to any party other than to Middlesbrough Council and disclaims all liability of any nature whatsoever to any such party in respect of this Report. TPi: Middlesbrough Taxi Review Final Report July 2010 - 2 - MIDDLESBROUGH COUNCIL TAXI RANK AND HACKNEY FLEET REVIEW JULY 2010 Contents Executive Summary 1.0 Context of the Study 2.0 Study Methodology – A Summary 3.0 Rank Review - Traffic Management Audit & Consultations 4.0 Rank Review - Options Development. 5.0 Rank Review - Recommendations 6.0 Hackney Fleet - Review Legislation and Guidance 7.0 Hackney Fleet Review - The Licensing Position in Middlesbrough 8.0 Hackney Fleet Review - Consultation 9.0 Hackney Fleet Review - The Taxi Market 10.0 Hackney Fleet Review - Conclusions and Recommendations Tables Table 3.1 Rank Locations for Audit Table 3.2 CCTV Location 1 Rank 1 Corporation Road (The Central) Results Table 3.3 CCTV Location 2 Rank 2 Exchange Square (Uncle Albert’s) Results Table 3.4 CCTV Location 3 Rank 3 Albert Road Results Table 3.5 CCTV Location 4 Rank 4 Corporation Road (Walkabout) Table 3.6 CCTV Location 5 Rank 5 Zetland Road (Brunswick Street / Last Orders) Table 3.7 CCTV Location 6a Rank 6a Wilson Street (Dundas Mews – Albert Road) Table 3.8 CCTV Location 6b Rank 6b Wilson Street (Dundas Mews – Linthorpe Street) Table 3.9 CCTV Location 7 Rank 7 Albert Road (Flares) Table 3.10 CCTV Location 8 Rank 8 Albert Road (HSBC) Table 3.11 CCTV Location 9 Rank 9 Bridge Street Table 3.12 CCTV Location 10 Rank 10 Newport Road (Middlesbrough Bus Station) Table 3.13 CCTV Location 11 Rank 11 Newport Road (Annie Street) Table 3.14 CCTV Location 12 Rank 12 Linthorpe Road (Village) Table 3.15 CCTV Location 13 Rank 13 Linthorpe Road (Rigatonis) Table 3.16 CCTV Location 14 Rank 14 Southfield Road (Dickens Inn) Table 3.17 CCTV Location 15 Rank 15 Southfield Road (Star & Garter) Table 3.18 CCTV Location 16 Rank 16 The Crown Table 3.19 CCTV Locations Summary of Total Taxi and Passenger Movements Table 3.20 Year 2008 – 2010 Rank Comparison Table 3.21 Hackney Carriage & Private Hire Town Access Junction Throughput Table 3.22 Hackney Carriage Driver Survey – Problems TPi: Middlesbrough Taxi Review Final Report July 2010 - 3 - Table 3.23 Hackney Carriage Driver Survey – Rank Location Table 3.24 Hackney Carriage Driver Survey – New Rank Locations Table 3.25 Hackney Carriage Driver Survey – High Volume Locations Table 3.26 Hackney Carriage Driver Survey – Centralised Rank Location Table 3.27 Hackney Carriage Driver Survey – Preferred Centralised Rank Location Table 3.28 Hackney Carriage Driver Survey – Work Arrangements Table 3.29 Hackney Carriage Driver Survey – Further Comments Table 3.30 Passenger Survey – Walking Time Table 3.31 Passenger Survey – Taxi Accessibility Table 3.32 Passenger Survey – Method Used to Acquire Taxi Table 3.33 Passenger Survey – Type of Taxi Used Table 3.34 Passenger Survey – Opinion on Provision of New Ranks Table 3.35 Passenger Survey – New Rank Locations Table 4.1 Low Key Improvements Table 4.2 Level 3 Infrastructure and soft measures Table 4.3 Level 4 Town Centre Cordon Table 5.1 Role of Taxi Marshall’s Table 5.2 Recommended Policies Table 5.3 Private Hire Holding Area Table 5.4 Town centre super rank locations Table 5.5 Existing Town Centre Rank Provision Table 5.6 Proposed Town Centre Rank Provision Table 5.7 Existing Southfield Lane / Southfield Road Rank Provision Table 5.8 Proposed Southfield Lane / Southfield Road Rank Provision Table 5.9 Benefits and disadvantages associated with closure of Wilson Street Table 5.10 Benefits and disadvantages associated with retention of Wilson Street Table.5.11 Benefits and disadvantages associated with a one-way system for Wilson Street Table 5.12 Review and Traffic Management Recommendations Table 6.1 Percentage of Wheelchair Accessible vehicles in Europe OECD 2007 Table 6.2 Benefits and Dis-benefits of side and rear loading Taxis Table 7.1 The Hackney Fleet in Middlesbrough Table 7.2 Access Features of Hackney Carriages in Middlesbrough Table 7.3 Seating Capacity of Hackney Carriages in Middlesbrough Table 7.4 Vehicle Models of Hackney Carriages in Middlesbrough Table 7.5 Age of Hackney Carriages in Middlesbrough TPi: Middlesbrough Taxi Review Final Report July 2010 - 4 - Table 7.6 Seating capacity of PHVs in Middlesbrough Table 7.7 Vehicle Models in the PHV fleet in Middlesbrough Table 7.8 Age of PHV fleet in Middlesbrough Table 8.1 Views of disabled people on Hackney Carriage vehicles Table 8.2 Views of disabled people on opening door of Hackney Carriage vehicles Table 8.3 Views of disabled people on door space of Hackney Carriage vehicles Table 8.4 Views of disabled people on the step of Hackney Carriage vehicles Table 8.5 Views of disabled people on using ramps of Hackney Carriage vehicles Table 8.6 Views of disabled people on reaching seat of Hackney Carriage vehicles Table 8.7 Views of disabled people on seat comfort of Hackney Carriage vehicles Table 8.8 Views of disabled people on vehicle interior of Hackney Carriage vehicles Table 8.9 Views of disabled people on getting out of Hackney Carriage vehicles Figures Figure 1 Proposals Figure 2 Options Figure 3 Town Centre Cordon–No vehicular access from 2000–0400 hours except for emergency vehicles Figure 4 Southfield Road/Linthorpe Road Figure 5.1 Existing town centre rank locations Figure 5.2 Recommended town centre rank locations Figure 5.3 Middlesbrough Town Centre Recommendations Figure 5.4 Exchange Square super rank Figure 5.5 Linthorpe Road / Southfield Road Recommendation Figure 7.1 Locations of Hackney Carriages registered in Middlesbrough Figure 7.2 Locations of PHV fleet in Middlesbrough Figure 8.1 Survey Responses from disabled people in Middlesbrough Charts Chart 1 Summary of Recommendations for Rank Review Chart 2 Summary of Recommendations for Hackney Fleet Review Appendices Appendix A Final Draft Report Written Feedback Appendix B Good Practice Elsewhere Appendix C Outline Proposal for a Middlesbrough Quality Taxi Partnership Appendix D Population per Hackney in Middlesbrough compared to other Licensing Authorities TPi: Middlesbrough Taxi Review Final Report July 2010 - 5 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1) Introduction Middlesbrough has an ambitious community strategy and well developed community engagement process. Key themes of the strategy are ensuring diversity, neighbourhood renewal, management; sustainability; community cohesion; and a transport network to support these – in which taxis and private hire vehicles play a key part. In addition, the Council is seeking to ensure quality taxis and private hire vehicles play an appropriate role in supporting the Mayor’s raising hope agenda built on the four pillars of: clean and safe environment; physical regeneration; enterprise culture and a transport network that meets the needs of the town. To assist in taking forward this agenda Middlesbrough Council commissioned Transportation Planning (International) Ltd to undertake an independent review of taxi operations in the town. The study comprised two separate elements of work: x Rank and Traffic Management Review; and x Hackney Carriage Vehicle Accessibility Audit. 2) Rank and Traffic Management Review The Rank and Traffic Management Review has the following objectives: x An examination of rank provision in the town centre, including pedestrian and vehicle access routes and permeability; x The establishment of customer needs; x Examination of ‘pinch points’ (locations identified as having high volumes of traffic at night); x Identification of parking/waiting locations for private hire vehicles and the potential implications of this; x An assessment of the safety issues; x Consideration of cost effective options for a centralised ranking arrangement; x Examination of the opportunities and benefits of road closures; x Identification of the potential for other traffic management measures; x Examination of the potential role of Taxi Marshall’s; x Ensuring solutions proposed accommodate all sectors of the taxi trade; and x Production of a final report detailing options and recommendations. To achieve these objectives the following tasks were undertaken: x Examination of recent reviews of taxi or rank provision; x Examination of traffic flow data in the town centre, Linthorpe Road and Southfield Road environs; x Examination of traffic regulation orders; x Examination of current traffic and transport planning policy in Middlesbrough; x Examination of good practice in other UK cities in terms of rank provision and operation; x Night and day time audit of existing ranks in terms of accessibility for passengers, current demand and supply; x Night and day time audit of existing town centre traffic management conditions; x Night and day time audit of existing town centre pedestrian desire lines; TPi: Middlesbrough Taxi Review Final Report July 2010 - 6 - x Traffic
Recommended publications
  • Can a Planning Contravention Notice Be Appealed
    Can A Planning Contravention Notice Be Appealed Aldis pargets her typologist inland, whole-wheat and incisive. Electrophoretic Powell redded unreconcilably. Complacent Barnebas remitting her tribologist so rightward that Sollie ratten very adroitly. We will formally confirmed by the notice can a planning be appealed and to The requirements of options available to a contravention of middlesbrough council can carry a contravention notice can a be appealed to sell your client relationship between legal proceedings where a continuous uninterrupted period. There however no right upon appeal Section 215 notice this character be used to require improvements to the appearance. The notice be used on the customer care in carrying out the precise location of planning contravention notice be a planning contravention notice can quickly as possible breach of lawfulness for. Again might appeal and be submitted under simple procedure previously described. Development and Planning Amendment Act 201. We decide it is caused harm to take formal enforcement officer on that contravention notice is no right of planning law count more likely, the gdpr cookie settings. We can improve your local authority need my letter and being caused by recipients of a contravention notices? There cannot also a rib of round against any formal notice must if planning. While planning applications can be viewed online we regret that it nothing not currently. An opportunity to the land at a considerable delay necessary, if it is the notice can also be suspended and there is. It must be acceptable development within an owner privileges to a planning can contravention notice be appealed against breaches of condition of a stop notice must specify the enforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex F –List of Consultees
    ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Local highway authorities Leicester City Council Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Leicestershire County Council Bath & NE Somerset Council Lincolnshire County Council Bedfordshire County Council Liverpool City Council Birmingham City Council Local Government Association Blackburn & Darwen London Borough of Barking & Dagenham Blackpool Borough Council London Borough of Barnet Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Bexley Borough of Poole London Borough of Brent Bournemouth Borough Council London Borough of Bromley Bracknell Forest Borough Council London Borough of Camden Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Croydon Brighton and Hove City Council London Borough of Ealing Bristol City Council London Borough of Enfield Buckinghamshire County Council London Borough of Greenwich Bury Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hackney Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hammersmith and Cambridgeshire County Council Fulham Cheshire County Council London Borough of Haringey City of York Council London Borough of Harrow Cornwall County Council London Borough of Havering Corporation of London London Borough of Hillingdon County of Herefordshire District Council London Borough of Hounslow Coventry City Council London Borough of Islington Cumbria County Council London Borough of Lambeth Cumbria Highways London Borough of Lewisham Darlington Borough Council London Borough of Merton Derby City Council London Borough of Newham Derbyshire County Council London
    [Show full text]
  • Councillor Submissions to the Middlesbrough Borough Council Electoral Review
    Councillor submissions to the Middlesbrough Borough Council electoral review. This PDF document contains 9 submissions from councillors. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Cllr Bernie Taylor Middlesbrough Council Town Hall Middlesbrough TS1 2QQ The Local Government Boundary Commission for England, Layden House 76-86 Turnmill Street London EC1M 5LG To the members and officers of the Commission, Having seen the Draft Recommendations for Middlesbrough which you have produced, I would like to thank you for the time and effort you no doubt spent on the plans. I would, however, like to draw your attention to a small row of houses whose residents I feel would be better served in the Newport Ward which you propose. I would also like to request that the name of the proposed Ayresome ward be changed to Acklam Green to reflect the local community and provide a clearer identity for the ward. There is a street of around fifteen properties whose residents would be better served if they were part of the proposed Newport ward. The houses run along the south side of Stockton Road – known colloquially as the ‘Wilderness Road.’ This road is cut off from the rest of the Aryesome ward by the A66 and isolated from the mane population centre of the proposed Aryesome ward by the Teesside Park Leisure complex. However, Stockton Road is easily accessed from the proposed Newport Road as the road travels under the A19 flyover.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority / Combined Authority / STB Members (July 2021)
    Local Authority / Combined Authority / STB members (July 2021) 1. Barnet (London Borough) 24. Durham County Council 50. E Northants Council 73. Sunderland City Council 2. Bath & NE Somerset Council 25. East Riding of Yorkshire 51. N. Northants Council 74. Surrey County Council 3. Bedford Borough Council Council 52. Northumberland County 75. Swindon Borough Council 4. Birmingham City Council 26. East Sussex County Council Council 76. Telford & Wrekin Council 5. Bolton Council 27. Essex County Council 53. Nottinghamshire County 77. Torbay Council 6. Bournemouth Christchurch & 28. Gloucestershire County Council 78. Wakefield Metropolitan Poole Council Council 54. Oxfordshire County Council District Council 7. Bracknell Forest Council 29. Hampshire County Council 55. Peterborough City Council 79. Walsall Council 8. Brighton & Hove City Council 30. Herefordshire Council 56. Plymouth City Council 80. Warrington Borough Council 9. Buckinghamshire Council 31. Hertfordshire County Council 57. Portsmouth City Council 81. Warwickshire County Council 10. Cambridgeshire County 32. Hull City Council 58. Reading Borough Council 82. West Berkshire Council Council 33. Isle of Man 59. Rochdale Borough Council 83. West Sussex County Council 11. Central Bedfordshire Council 34. Kent County Council 60. Rutland County Council 84. Wigan Council 12. Cheshire East Council 35. Kirklees Council 61. Salford City Council 85. Wiltshire Council 13. Cheshire West & Chester 36. Lancashire County Council 62. Sandwell Borough Council 86. Wokingham Borough Council Council 37. Leeds City Council 63. Sheffield City Council 14. City of Wolverhampton 38. Leicestershire County Council 64. Shropshire Council Combined Authorities Council 39. Lincolnshire County Council 65. Slough Borough Council • West of England Combined 15. City of York Council 40.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesbrough Council Local Development Framework Statement of Involvement
    Middlesbrough Council Local Development Framework Statement of Involvement Consultation Statement February 2010 Urban Policy Unit Regeneration Department PO Box 99A Civic Centre Middlesbrough TS1 2QQ T: 01642 729065 E: [email protected] www.middlesbrough.gov.uk Contents Introduction 2 How the consultation was undertaken 2 Appendix 1: List of main and other consultees. Appendix 2: Initial letter sent to main and other consultees Appendix 3: Summary of responses from the initial consultation, including the Council’s response Appendix 4: Public consultation letter sent to main and other consultees Appendix 5: Copy of the Public Notice Appendix 6: Summary of responses from the public consultation, including the Council’s response. The Regeneration Department covers a range of different services of which Urban Policy is one. The Department’s service aims and objectives, along with its diversity and community cohesion commitments are contained in its Service and Diversity Action Plans. Middlesbrough Council – LDF Statement of Community Involvement – Consultation Statement Consultation Report Middlesbrough Council – Local Development Framework Statement of Community Involvement Introduction 1. This document sets out the consultation that was carried out on the revised Statement of Community Involvement, the representations received and the Council’s response to those representations. How the consultation was undertaken 2. Under the provisions of Regulation 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2008, the Council sent a letter to its main consultees (see Appendix 1) on 27 August 2009 to inform them of the Council’s intention to review the adopted SCI, and to invite them to comment on what the revised document could include.
    [Show full text]
  • DYING BEFORE OUR TIME? Achieving Longer and Healthier Lives in Middlesbrough
    DYING BEFORE OUR TIME? ACHIEVING LONGER AND HEALTHIER LIVES IN MIDDLESbrougH Middlesbrough DPH Annual Report 2016/17 middlesbrough.gov.uk DYING BEFORE OUR TIME? ACHIEVING LONGER AND HEALTHIER LIVES IN MIDDLESbrougH Middlesbrough DPH Annual Report 2016/17 CONTENTS Foreword ............................................................................................................................. 04 Progress against 2015/16 recommendations ............................................................ 05 Chapter 1 ....................................................................................................................... 06 Overview of life expectancy and healthy life expectancy in Middlesbrough Chapter 2 Cancer ......................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 3 Circulatory diseases ................................................................................ 27 Chapter 4 Respiratory diseases ................................................................................ 33 Chapter 5 External causes ......................................................................................... 38 (accidents and injuries, suicide, alcohol and drugs misuse) Chapter 6 Infant mortality and child deaths ......................................................... 49 Chapter 7 Excess winter mortality ........................................................................... 52 Chapter 8 Recommendations ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide Historic Mineral Planning Permissions
    User Guide Historic Mineral Planning Permissions Open Report OR/14/017 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN REPORT OR/14/017 User Guide Historic Mineral Planning Permissions The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Licence No: 100017897/2010. Keywords Mineral, planning, permission, MHLG. National Grid Reference SW corner 83000, 2800 NE corner 580000, 660000 Front cover Cover picture fuller’s earth working, Woburn sands, Bedfordshire. Bibliographical reference User Guide Historic Mineral Planning Permissions. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/14/017. 15 pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. © NERC 2014. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2014 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS shops at British Geological Survey offices Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com BGS Central Enquiries Desk Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including maps, for consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Q2 1617 LA Referrals
    Referrals to Local Authority Adoption Agencies from First4Adoption by region Q2 July-September 2016 Yorkshire & The Humber LA Adoption Agencies North East LA Adoption Agencies Durham County Council 13 North Yorkshire County Council* 30 1 Northumberland County Council 8 Barnsley Adoption Fostering Unit 11 South Tyneside Council 8 Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council 11 2 North Tyneside Council 5 Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council 10 Redcar Cleveland Borough Council 5 Hull City Council 10 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Middlesbrough Council 3 East Riding Of Yorkshire Council 9 City Of Sunderland 2 Cumbria County Council 7 Gateshead Council 2 Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council 6 1 Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 2 0 3.5 7 10.5 14 Leeds City Council 6 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council 5 Hartlepool Borough Council 4 North Lincolnshire Adoption Service 4 1 City Of York Council 3 North East Lincolnshire Adoption Service 3 1 Darlington Borough Council 2 Kirklees Metropolitan Council 2 1 Sheffield Metropolitan City Council 2 Wakefield Metropolitan District Council 2 * Denotes agencies with more than one office entry on the agency finder 0 10 20 30 40 North West LA Adoption Agencies Liverpool City Council 30 Cheshire West And Chester County Council 16 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council 11 1 Manchester City Council 9 WWISH 9 Lancashire County Council 8 Oldham Council 8 1 Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council 8 2 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Wirral Adoption Team 8 Salford City Council 7 3 Bury Metropolitan
    [Show full text]
  • VERITAU LIMITED Creation of a Subsidiary
    VERITAU LIMITED Creation of a subsidiary company – requirement for shareholder approval 1.0 Purpose 1.1 To seek shareholder approval for the expansion of Veritau through the creation of a subsidiary company. 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Veritau Limited was established in 2009 as a shared service company. The company is jointly owned by North Yorkshire County Council and the City of York Council. Veritau provides internal audit and other assurance services to the two councils. 2.2 Veritau expanded in 2012, with the creation of a subsidiary company, Veritau North Yorkshire Limited. Veritau North Yorkshire Limited is 50% owned by Veritau Limited with the remaining shares owned by four North Yorkshire district councils. As well as its member councils, the Veritau group provides services to a range of other public sector bodies, including North Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service, Doncaster Children’s Services Trust, Selby Housing Trust, 3 x National Park authorities, plus various housing associations, town councils and academy schools. The group operates as a single business under a uniform management structure below board level. The group has common policies, procedures and systems. It has also adopted a single brand image. 2.3 Since its creation, Veritau has been open to other local authorities joining the shared service providing any expansion is in the best interests of the group and its existing shareholders. Recently discussions have been taking place with a number of other councils about them possibly joining the group. The councils are Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council, Middlesbrough Council and Scarborough Borough Council. 2.4 To prevent any dilution in control for NYCC and CYC, any new member councils would need join the group by either becoming a member of Veritau North Yorkshire Limited (subject to the agreement of the existing shareholders of the company) or through the creation of a new subsidiary company (similar to Veritau North Yorkshire).
    [Show full text]
  • Nunthorpe Parish Council Tree Policy July 2019
    Nunthorpe Parish Council Policy, principles and guidance on trees in Nunthorpe Nunthorpe Parish Council Trees are a highly valued feature of the parish of Nunthorpe making an enormous contribution to the character and beauty of our landscape. Trees create and maintain environments rich in biodiversity. Nunthorpe Parish Council recognises both the human and environmental benefits of having a healthy and sustainable tree population. The Parish Council has established this Policy, which is subordinate to, but consistent with, Middlesbrough Council’s Tree Policy. POLICY ON MANAGEMENT OF TREES IN NUNTHORPE Nunthorpe Parish Council has agreed to undertake the following ten activities on behalf of the residents of Nunthorpe 1. To monitor and respond to all proposals by Middlesbrough Council for rezoning of land which could entail removal of trees. 2. To monitor and respond to all planning applications to Middlesbrough Council from developers, residents, utility companies or others which could entail removal of trees. 3. To monitor the implementation of Middlesbrough Council's Tree Policy by Council Officers, residents, utility companies, and others, drawing attention to apparent deviation. 4. To urge Middlesbrough Council to engage in meaningful consultation with the Parish Council, Ward Councillors and residents regarding any proposals by Middlesbrough Council to fell mature trees. Nunthorpe Parish Council 5. To encourage Middlesbrough Council to replace trees felled for good cause by Middlesbrough Council with at least an equal number of mature trees in as close proximity as possible to the felled trees, and with specific replacement sites recommended before the felling takes place (whether the trees were removed due to disease, to preserve public safety, or to facilitate development.) 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Nunthorpe and Poole Appraisal and Management Plan
    NUNTHORPE AND POOLE CONSERVATION AREA CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL AND MANAGEMENT PLAN June 2008 N U N T H O R P E & P O O L E C O N S E R V A T I O N A R E A CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 3 2 Conservation Area Boundary 5 3 Location, Setting and Population 8 4 Historical Analysis 9 - Origins and Development - Archaeology 5 General Character 13 6 Character Area 1 14 7 Character Area 2 18 8 Character Area 3 21 9 Character Area 4 24 10 Character Area 5 27 11 Management Plan 30 12 Preservation Policies 31 13 Enhancement Opportunities 37 Appendices Appendix A References Appendix B Listed Building Descriptions Appendix C Scheduled Ancient Monument Description Appendix D Guidance on works to Historic Buildings and Buildings in Conservation Areas 1 N U N T H O R P E & P O O L E C O N S E R V A T I O N A R E A List of Maps Map 1 Context Map Map 2 The Conservation Area boundary Map 3 Extract from Ordnance Survey Map 1853 Map 4 Extract from Ordnance Survey Map 1894 Map 5 Extract from Ordnance Survey Map 1915 Map 6 Extract from Ordnance Survey Map 1938 Map 7 Historic Development Map 8 Figure Ground Map 9 Use plan Map 10 Spaces and Views Map 11 Listed buildings and buildings that make a positive contribution Map 12 Negative and Neutral Factors Map 13 Character Areas Prepared by Woodhall Planning & Conservation, Leeds. June 2008 2 N U N T H O R P E & P O O L E C O N S E R V A T I O N A R E A 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Call Sign Sept 12
    September 2012 KKaarreenn mmoottoorrccyycclleess rroouunndd EEuurrooppee ttoo hheellpp tthhee MMSSSS Call Sign September 2012 Page 2 NASH’S NUMBERS From Alan Nash (A95) After a terrible time workwise during the Olympics, we need to know where the work may be this month and try and make up for August. This is a table of some “What’s on” in September, but see the bottom of page for more info... “What’s On September 2012” (Compact list: See base of page for how to get more) Only 54 events listed above, but for a comprehensive list of over 350 events including the Paralympics, visit www.nashsnumbers.co.uk and click the “MyFav Taxi” button, which will load the MyFav Taxi page with over 70 iconic link buttons to useful taxi related information including the “What’s On in September “ button. Call Sign September 2012 Page 3 from the editor’s desk Looking back at the Olympics... when everyone says yes and not just a few who Well that’s it for another 84 years – the main part want to charge ridiculously low prices to where of the Olympics are over and our hopes for some they live in case they happen to be going home at extra July and August work courtesy of the Games the time. Quoting £30 to Luton because you live must have fallen on deaf ears! The Olympic Route there would be stupid, but reasonable prices may Networks proved to be successful because they bring back some longer trips. killed London’s business and leisure outlets stone dead, with most folk deciding to take note of the New taxis Mayor and keep well away from the capital.
    [Show full text]