The Old Post Office Wye Road Boughton Aluph Ashford Kent TN25
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Ashford Borough Council - Report of Development Control Managers Planning Committee 28 April 2010 ___________________________________________________________________ Application Number 10/00138/AS Location The Old Post Office, Wye Road, Boughton Aluph, Ashford, Kent, TN25 4HH Grid Reference 02283/47302 Parish Council Boughton Aluph Ward Boughton Aluph and Eastwell Application Proposed replacement of existing dilapidated lean to side Description extension by a new conservatory Applicant Mr and Mrs F Edwards, The Old Post Office, Wye Road, Boughton Aluph, Ashford, Kent, TN25 4HH Agent Mr Charles Brackenbury, Charles Brackenbury Architects, 29 Scotton Street, Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5BU Site Area 0.2 Hectares (a) 2/- (b) S (c) - Introduction 1. The application is being reported to the Planning Committee at the request of the Ward Member Councillor Mrs Hawes. The Ward Member is not a Member of the Planning Committee. Site and Surroundings 2. The application site comprises a detached dwellinghouse located inside the built confines of Boughton Lees for the purposes of development control. The site lies within the Boughton Lees Conservation Area, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, a Special Landscape Area and the Boughton Lees Horticultural Valley Landscape Character Area. 3. The two storey dwelling is grade II listed and is described in the listing details as a17th Century timber framed dwelling with 18th Century Cladding. The character of the building is red brick with a clay tile roof and a brick modillion eaves cornice to the hipped roof. There are later single storey 20th Century extensions to the east and west side elevations however despite these 7.1 Ashford Borough Council - Report of Development Control Managers Planning Committee 28 April 2010 ___________________________________________________________________ additions the building has retained its primary historic interest and has a strong simple plan form. 4. The property, which fronts onto and is very visible from the village green, is set back from the highway by approximately 8 metres. 5. Plans of the site are attached to this report as annex 1. Proposal 6. Full planning permission is sought for the erection of a single storey side extension with a floor area of 16m² (listed building consent is also required for this, see 10/00139/AS on this agenda). The proposed extension would replace the existing lean to style side extension which has a floor area of 9m². 7. Existing and proposed plans are attached as annex 2 to this report. 8. The applicant has submitted information in support of the scheme which can be summarised as follows: • The development would replace an unsightly existing lean to extension in a dilapidated state and is not simply a new first time extension in this location. • Conservatories are seen on rural cottages and are therefore traditional. • The reason for the shallow pitched roof is to ensure that traditional brick wall with corbelled eaves above remains fully visible. • The development meets with the key criteria set out in PPS5 and the companion guide ‘Historic Environment Planning Practice Guide’ Planning History 9. There is no relevant planning history. Consultations Ward Member: The Ward Member, Councillor Mrs Hawes, requests that the application is considered by the Planning Committee. Boughton Aluph Parish Council: Support the application Neighbours: 2 neighbours directly consulted. 0 representations received. 7.2 Ashford Borough Council - Report of Development Control Managers Planning Committee 28 April 2010 ___________________________________________________________________ Planning Policy 10. The Development Plan comprises the Regional Spatial Strategy (The South East Plan, May 2009), the saved policies in the adopted Ashford Borough Local Plan 2000, the adopted LDF Core Strategy 2008 and the adopted Ashford Town Centre Action Area Plan 2010. 11. The relevant policies from the Development Plan relating to this application are as follows:- South East Plan 2009 CC1 – Sustainable development. C4 – Landscape and countryside management. BE6 – Management of the historic environment. Ashford Borough Local Plan 2000 EN16 – Development in Conservation Areas EN27 - Landscape conservation. Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2008 CS1 – Guiding principles. CS9 – Design quality. 12. The following are also material to the determination of this application:- Government Advice Planning Policy Statement 1 – ‘Delivering Sustainable Development’ Planning Policy Statement 5 – ‘Planning for the Historic Environment’ Supplementary Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning Guidance Note 10 – ‘Domestic Extensions in Urban and Rural Areas’ adopted June 2004 following public consultation. Tenterden & Rural Sites DPD TRS17 – Landscape character and design 13. Members should note that the Tenterden & Rural Sites DPD should be given some weight when making a decision as it has now been submitted to the Secretary of State for examination but where the policy conflicts with the Development Plan, the Development Plan takes precedence unless this report advises otherwise. 7.3 Ashford Borough Council - Report of Development Control Managers Planning Committee 28 April 2010 ___________________________________________________________________ Assessment 14. The main issues for consideration are: • The impact of the development upon the character and appearance of the listed building and the visual amenity of the wider landscape designated as a Conservation Area, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, a Landscape Character Area and a Special Landscape Area. • Justification for the development. • Residential amenity. Policy and Guidance Context 15. Section 66 (1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 requires Local Authorities when considering applications for planning permission for development that affects a listed building to have a special regard to the desirability of preserving the building and any features of architectural or historic interest which it may possess. 16. Section 72 of the above act also states that special attention shall be paid to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the conservation area. In addition a key principle of PPS1 states that design which fails to take the opportunities available for improving the character and quality of an area should not be accepted. 17. This is further endorsed by Central Government Guidance contained within PPS5 and its companion guide which sets out a presumption in favour of the conservation of designated heritage assets such as listed buildings. This guidance states that whilst some listed buildings and Conservation Areas will be particularly important or sensitive to change others may be more capable of accommodating it. Local planning authorities must therefore take into account the desirability of sustaining and enhancing the significance of heritage assets and of utilising their positive role of place shaping and sustainable communities. The guidance also states that new development should make a positive contribution to the character and local distinctiveness of the historic environment through design that has taken into account the character of the building and the surrounding area and should not result in a loss of significance. 18. In addition to the above national guidance the Councils own adopted supplementary planning guidance (SPG10) makes provision for extensions to residential dwellings as a matter of principle provided that the proposed extension is justified, sympathetic to the design and scale of the existing 7.4 Ashford Borough Council - Report of Development Control Managers Planning Committee 28 April 2010 ___________________________________________________________________ dwelling and would not result in a poorly proportioned or visually intrusive form of development within the landscape. The Impact of the Development Upon the Character and Appearance of the Listed Building and the Visual Amenity of the Wider Designated Area 19. The existing modern extension is not typically traditional in its overall design or a sympathetic addition to this building however its small size assists in lessening the impact upon the character of the building and the surrounding area. The removal of this addition would represent a visual improvement to the character and appearance of the building and the Conservation Area. 20. The replacement side extension, whilst single storey, would be larger than the existing extension in floor area and more decorative in its design and form resulting in a more prominent addition which will be visible from public view points within the Conservation Area. The shallow roof pitch, materials and detailing do not replicate that of the building itself and are not a traditional form but rather a style that is typically modern. The frame of the conservatory would be white aluminium rather than the more traditional timber As such the proposed development would not represent a sympathetic addition to this heritage asset and would fail to preserve the building’s historic character and appearance and would therefore be inappropriate. The extension exacerbates the harm caused by the existing addition and therefore fails to comply with the requirements of PPS1 and PPS5. 21. Because of this and as the proposed extension is on a very visible elevation it would also fail to preserve or enhance the character of the Conservation Area, the visual amenity of the designated Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, the Special