Petitioners, V

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Petitioners, V No. 20- IN THE Supreme Court of the United States DAVID CASSIRER, et al., Petitioners, v. THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA COLLECTION FOUNDATION, an AGency or instrumentality of the KinGdom of SPain Respondent. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CouRT OF AppEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRcuIT PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI STEPHEN N. ZACK DAVid BOIES ANDREW S. BRENNER Counsel of Record ROSSANA BAEZA BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 333 Main Street 100 SE Second Street, Suite 2800 Armonk, NY 10504 Miami, FL 33131 (914) 749 8200 (305) 539-8400 [email protected] SAMUEL J. DUbbiN, P.A. DAVid A. BARRETT DUbbiN & KRAVETZ, LLP BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 1200 Anastasia Avenue, Suite 300 55 Hudson Yards Coral Gables, FL 33134 New York, NY 10001 (305) 371-4700 (212) 446-2300 LAURA W. BRILL NICHOLAS DAUM KENDALL BRILL & KELLY LLP 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90067 (310) 556-2700 Counsel for Petitioners 304280 QUESTION PRESENTED The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1602–1611 (“FSIA”), provides that where a foreign nation is not immune from jurisdiction in the courts of the United States or of any State, it “shall be liable in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances.” Id. § 1606. In four circuits, the courts of appeals have held that this statutory requirement of parity with private litigation means that a federal court hearing an FSIA case must apply the choice-of-law rules of the State in which it is sitting. But the Ninth Circuit has held—repeatedly and without meaningful analysis, including in the decision below—that choice of law in FSIA cases is determined by application of federal common law. The choice of law issue is critical in this case, in which the family of a Holocaust survivor seeks the return of a painting stolen by the Nazis. Under California law, a holder of stolen property (such as the Spanish state museum here) can never acquire good title, while under Spanish law, an adverse possession rule protects the museum’s title. The question presented is: Whether a federal court hearing state law claims brought under the FSIA must apply the forum state’s choice-of-law rules to determine what substantive law governs the claims at issue, or whether it may apply federal common law. i PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Petitioners, all of whom were plaintiffs in the district court and appellants in the court of appeals, are David Cassirer, the Estate of Ava Cassirer, and the Jewish Federation of San Diego County. Respondent is the Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, an agency or instrumentality of the Kingdom of Spain (“TBC”), which was the defendant in the district court and appellee in the court of appeals. ii CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT United Jewish Federation of San Diego is a nonprofit corporation with no parent corporation and no stock. iii RELATED PROCEEDINGS Cassirer v. Kingdom of Spain, et al., Nos. 06-56325, 06-56406, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Judgment entered September 8, 2009. En banc judgment entered August 12, 2010. (“Cassirer I”) Kingdom of Spain, et al. v. Estate of Claude Cassirer, No. 10-786, U.S. Supreme Court. Petition for writ of certiorari denied June 27, 2011. Cassirer, et al., v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, No. 12-56159, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Judgment entered Dec. 9, 2013. Petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc denied February 11, 2014. (“Cassirer II”) Cassirer, et al., v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, Nos. 15-55550, 15- 55951, 15-55977, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Judgment entered July 10, 2017. Petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc denied December 5, 2017. (“Cassirer III”) Cassirer, et al., v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, No. 17-1245, U.S. Supreme Court. Petition for writ of certiorari denied May 14, 2018. Cassirer, et al., v. Kingdom of Spain, No. 05-cv-3549, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Judgment entered May 17, 2019. Cassirer, et al., v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, No.19-55616, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Judgment entered August 17, 2020. Petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc denied December 7, 2020. (“Cassirer IV”) iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED ......................................................................................... i PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING ......................................................................... ii CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ....................................................... iii RELATED PROCEEDINGS .................................................................................... iv TABLE OF APPENDICES ...................................................................................... vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................. vii OPINIONS BELOW .................................................................................................. 1 JURISDICTION ......................................................................................................... 1 RELEVANT STATUTORY PROVISIONS ............................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE .................................................................................. 4 A. Respondents’ Unsuccessful Procedural Defenses ................................. 5 B. Choice-of-Law and Substantive Rulings Below ................................... 7 REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION ....................................................... 9 I. THIS COURT SHOULD RESOLVE THE ENTRENCHED CIRCUIT SPLIT ON AN IMPORTANT ISSUE OF FEDERAL STATUTORY INTERPRETATION, NAMELY WHETHER THE FSIA REQUIRES APPLICATION OF STATE LAW OR FEDERAL COMMON LAW TO DETERMINE CHOICE-OF-LAW ....................................................... 9 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 23 v TABLE OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A – OPINION OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, FILED AUGUST 17, 2020 APPENDIX B – OPINION OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FILED APRIL 30, 2019 APPENDIX C – OPINION OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, DATED JULY 10, 2017 APPENDIX D – OPINION OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FILED JUNE 4, 2015 APPENDIX E – DENIAL OF REHEARING OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, FILED DECEMBER 7, 2020 APPENDIX F – RELEVANT STATUTORY PROVISIONS – FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1602–1605, 1606 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases: Bakalian v. Central Bank of Republic of Turkey, 932 F.3d 1229 (9th Cir. 2019) ............................................................................... 9 Bank of New York v. Yugoimport, 745 F.3d 599 (2d Cir. 2014) .......................................................................... 10, 13 Barkanic v. General Admin. of Civil Aviation of the People’s Republic of China, 923 F.2d 957 (2d Cir. 1991) .............................................................. 10, 13, 14, 15 Bernstein v. N.V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvart-Maatschappij, 210 F.2d 375 (2d Cir. 1954) .................................................................................21 Cassirer v. Kingdom of Spain, 616 F.3d 1019 (9th Cir. 2010) ...........................................................................5, 6 Cassirer v.Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Found., 153 F. Supp. 3d 1148 (C.D. Cal. 2015) ...................................................... 1, 7, 20 Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Found., 737 F.3d 613 (9th Cir. 2013) ................................................................................. 6 Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, 824 F. App’x 452 (9th Cir. 2020) ............................................................... 1, 9, 22 Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, 862 F.3d 951 (9th Cir. 2017) ....................................................................... passim Chuidian v. Philippine Nat. Bank, 976 F.2d 561 (9th Cir. 1992) ...............................................................................10 Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786 (2d Cir. 1980) .................................................................................12 Crocker Nat’l Bank v. Byrne & McDonnell, 178 Cal. 329 (1918) .............................................................................................18 Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp, 592 U.S. __ (2021) ................................................................................................. 6 vii First Nat. City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior de Cuba, 462 U.S. 611 (1983) .............................................................................................13 Griffin v. McCoach, 313 U.S. 498 (1941) ...................................................................................... 18, 22 ABF Cap. Corp. v. Grove Properties Co., 126 Cal. App. 4th 204 (2005) ..............................................................................14 Harris v. Polskie Linie Lotnicze, 820 F.2d 1000 (9th Cir. 1987) ...................................................................... 11, 12 Kasel v. Remington
Recommended publications
  • The Thyssen Art Macabre Chapter II (Page 33) 1900-1915 : the Arrival of the Bornemiszas
    Contents Abbreviations (Page xiii) Acknowledgements (Page xv) Introduction (Page 3) Prologue (Page 5) 1996: Heini & Tita ... Lunch on the Costa Brava Meeting in Spain, with the Baron and Baroness Thyssen-Bornemisza prior to the Thyssen v. Thyssen court case in Bermuda : The final chapter in the $3.5 billion legal battle between Heini and his eldest son. Chapter I (Page 13) 1685—1900 : 'Old' August Thyssen ... The myth of the self-made man The Thyssens' rise to power : The birth of August Thyssen: His privileged education: His and his sister's financially motivated marriages: The vital contribution of his brother Josef: The creation of the Thyssen brothers' industrial empire : August's brilliant but ruthless business methods: The birth of his four children : The collapse of his marriage leading to a crippling settlement which resulted in the loss of ownership of his industrial empire : The arrival of the Price family. The Thyssen Art Macabre Chapter II (Page 33) 1900-1915 : The arrival of the Bornemiszas ... Buying into the aristocracy August Thyssen's status as the first German billionaire and one of the richest men in the world : The acquisition of a castle and his foundation of an art collection : His son Heinrich's purchase of the title of Baron from the Bornemisza family and assumption of the role of Hungarian aristocrat as the Baron Heinrich Thyssen-Bornemisza : The first Thyssen v. Thyssen court battle between father and son : Start of company's war production. Chapter III (Page 52) 1915-1926 : Blood & iron ... The profits of war The death of August's brother Josef: August's sons, Heinrich and Fritz's introduction to the business : Founding of Dutch bank : Their profitable survival of the First World War : Heinrich's flight to Holland from the communist revolution in Hungary : Development of family's anti- Semitism : Birth of Heini and separation of parents : Heini's childhood : Beginning of Fritz and Heinrich's involvement with Hitler and the Nazi Party : Founding of Heinrich's American bank : The death of August Thyssen and his dreams of a dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • Memoria De Sostenibilidad 2017 El Arte Como Forma De Comunicación Índice
    Memoria de Sostenibilidad 2017 El arte como forma de comunicación Índice 04 PRESENTACIÓN 06 NUESTRA HISTORA E HITOS 08 ARTE, TIEMPO Y BELLEZA: La colección, nuestra razón de ser 08 25 aÑOS DE HISTORIA Museo Nacional Thyssen -Bornemisza: 10 50 UN LUGAR DE ENCUENTRO Educathyssen: educación, diálogo, 51 una misión que nos trasciende innovación e integración Celebrando el 25 Aniversario 11 Contribuyendo a construir 57 una sociedad mejor Nuestro Patronato 14 Un museo accesible para todos 59 16 UN EQUIPO QUE Nuestros profesionales 17 El Museo Thyssen y los Objetivos 60 LO HACE POSIBLE de Desarrollo Sostenible Conciliación y equilibrio 20 Arte y sostenibilidad. Algunos retos 62 Igualdad y diversidad 21 sociales desde la colección Thyssen -Bornemisza Desarrollo personal y profesional 22 Otras vías de participación social 63 Fomento de la Comunicación Interna 24 Con la familia 25 64 AMIGOS Y COLABORADORES Programa de Amigos del Museo 64 Cuidando la salud y la seguridad 26 Los amigos corporativos 66 Entidades colaboradoras 67 28 DONDE EL ARTE Y LA Exposiciones 2017 28 EXCELENCIA CONVERGEN Eventos corporativos 69 Otros servicios del Museo 34 Modelos de gestión 36 70 ANEXo 1: SOBRE LA MEMORIA 2 3 PRESENTACIÓN Presentación Es una satisfacción comprobar que, gracias a la actividad del Museo, contribuimos al crecimiento económico de la ciudad de Madrid y a la proyección internacional de DIRECTOR GERENTE Evelio Acevedo España como destino turístico cultural DIRECTOR ARTÍSTICO Es una gran satisfacción poder presentar la primera memoria de sostenibilidad El Museo también trabaja con el objetivo de convertirse en un espacio abierto, Guillermo Solana del Museo Nacional Thyssen-Bornemisza correspondiente al ejercicio 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentación De Powerpoint
    THE TRUTH ABOUT CATALONIA’S BID FOR INDEPENDENCE Last update: 28 November 2019 This document is subject to the evolution of the events it contains and will be periodically updated. Please note the date of the last update and, if necessary, request the latest version from: [email protected] This edition has only been updated to include the sentences of the trial that were published on 14 October. The verb tenses of the previous version have been maintained, without prejudice to the fact that a last update can be made by adjusting the concordances. Contents CATALONIA’S BID FOR INDEPENDENCE 1. Timeline of the Independence bid THE CATALAN INDEPENDENCE BID ON TRIAL 2. The acts of 2017 and their prosecution 3. The five Articles of Spain’s Criminal Code that landed the procès defendants in the dock 4. Safeguards for the accused during the trial 5. Independence and safeguards of the Spanish legal system 6. Private prosecution: What is it? 7. The trial and sentences THE TRUTH ABOUT SPAIN AND ITS CATALAN REGION 8. The secessionists’ falsehoods 9. Spain is a state made up of Autonomous Communities 10. The price Catalonia is paying for the independence bid 11. Spain in international rankings QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS APPENDIX CATALONIA’S BID FOR INDEPENDENCE 1. Timeline of the Independence bid 11 SEPT Massive demonstration day (or Diada) for independence 2012 “Consultative process” • Promoted by the Catalan Regional 9 NOV Government [known as the Govern], presided by Artur Mas. 2014 Suspended by Spain’s Constitutional Court. • According to the Catalan regional administration [known as the Generalitat] 2,305,290 citizens voted and 80.76% of them voted in favour of independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:17-Cv-01533-TSC Document 2 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 2
    Case 1:17-cv-01533-TSC Document 2 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) P.K., et al., ) on behalf of themselves and all others ) similarly situated, ) No. ------- ) Plaintiffs/Petitioners, ) ) V. ) ) REX W. TILLERSON, et al., ) ) Defendants/Respondents. ) ) PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND EMERGENCY MOTION FOR MANDAMUS RELIEF Plaintiffs hereby move this court for a preliminary injunction and for emergency mandamus relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 65 and LCvR. 65.l(c). In support of their motion, Plaintiffs rely on the accompanying Memorandum, declarations, and exhibits. A proposed order is attached. STATEMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7(m) Pursuant to Local Rule 7(m), Plaintiffs' counsel unsuccessfully attempted to contact Defendants' counsel to determine if Defendants would consent to the relief requested in this motion. 1 Case 1:17-cv-01533-TSC Document 2 Filed 08/03/17 Page 2 of 2 July 31, 2017 Respectfully submitted, -~ Samer E. Khalaf (pro hac vice pending) Matthew E. Price (DC Bar# 996158) Abed A. Ayoub Max J. Minzner (pro hac vice pending) Yolanda Rondon JENNER & BLOCK LLP AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION 1099 New York Ave. NW Suite 900 COMMITTEE Washington, DC 20001 1705 DeSales Street, N.W., Suite 500 Tel. 202-639-6000 Washington, D.C. 20036 Fax: 202-639-6066 Tel: 202-244-2990 Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Karen C. Tumlin Omar C. Jadwat Esther Sung AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION NATIONAL lMMIGRA TION LAW CENTER FOUNDATION 3435 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1600 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90010 New York, NY 10004 (213) 639-3900 Tel: (212) 549-2600 [email protected] Fax: (212) 549-2654 [email protected] [email protected] Justin B.
    [Show full text]
  • Cassirer Collection, 1906-1933
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf538nb0pb No online items Guide to the Cassirer collection, 1906-1933 Department of Special Collections Green Library Stanford University Libraries Stanford, CA 94305-6004 Phone: (650) 725-1022 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www-sul.stanford.edu/depts/spc/ © 1999 The Board of Trustees of Stanford University. All rights reserved. Guide to the Cassirer collection, Special Collections M0287 1 1906-1933 Guide to the Cassirer collection, 1906-1933 Collection number: M0287 Department of Special Collections and University Archives Stanford University Libraries Stanford, California Contact Information Department of Special Collections Green Library Stanford University Libraries Stanford, CA 94305-6004 Phone: (650) 725-1022 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www-sul.stanford.edu/depts/spc/ Processed by: Special Collections staff Date Completed: 1986 © 1999 The Board of Trustees of Stanford University. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Cassirer collection, Date (inclusive): 1906-1933 Collection number: Special Collections M0287 Creator: Cassirer, Bruno.Cassirer, Paul, 1871-1926. Extent: .5 linear ft. Repository: Stanford University. Libraries. Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives. Language: English. Access Restrictions None. Publication Rights Property rights reside with the repository. Literary rights reside with the creators of the documents or their heirs. To obtain permission to publish or reproduce, please contact the Public Services Librarian of the Dept. of Special Collections. Provenance l. Bruno Cassirer Verlag papers, gifts of George Hill, 1979, 1980, and Peter Paret, 1986. 2. Paul Cassirer Verlag papers and Paul Cassirer papers, gifts of Peter Paret, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1983, 1985, and 1986. Preferred Citation: [Identification of item] Cassirer collection, M0287, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • The Guatemala Genocide Cases: Universal Jurisdiction and Its Limits
    © The Guatemala Genocide Cases: Universal Jurisdiction and Its Limits by Paul “Woody” Scott* INTRODUCTION Systematic murder, genocide, torture, terror and cruelty – all are words used to describe the campaigns of Guatemalan leaders, including President Jose Efrain Rios Montt, directed toward the indigenous Mayans in the Guatemalan campo. The United Nations-backed Truth Commission concludes that the state carried out deliberate acts of genocide against the Mayan indigenous populations.1 Since Julio Cesar Mendez Montenegro took Guatemalan presidential office in 1966, Guatemala was involved in a bloody civil war between the army and guerrilla groups located in the Guatemalan countryside. The bloodshed escalated as Montt, a fundamentalist Christian minister, rose to power in 1982 after taking part in a coup d’état and becoming the de facto president of Guatemala. He was in power for just sixteen months, considered by many to be the bloodiest period of Guatemala’s history.2 Under his sixteen-month rule, more than 200,000 people were victims of homicide or forced kidnappings, 83% of whom were of indigenous Mayan origin. Indigenous Mayans were targeted, killed, tortured, raped, and * Paul “Woody” Scott is an associate attorney with Jeri Flynn & Associates in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. His practice is primarily immigration law and criminal defense, specializing in defending immigrants charged with criminal offenses, and deportation defense. He was born in San Pedro Sula, Honduras and moved to the United States at a very early age. He is fluent in both English and Spanish. 1 United Nations Office for Project Services [UNOPS], Commission for Historical Clarification [CEH], Conclusions and Recommendations, GUATEMALA, MEMORIA DEL SILENCIO [hereinafter, GUATEMALA, MEMORY OF SILENCE], Volume V, ¶ 26 (1999).
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Times of Karola Szilvássy, Transylvanian Aristocrat and Modern Woman*
    Cristian, Réka M.. “The Life and Times of Karola Szilvássy, A Transylvanian Aristocrat and Modern Woman.” Hungarian Cultural Studies. e-Journal of the American Hungarian Educators Association, Volume 12 (2019) DOI: 10.5195/ahea.2019.359 The Life and Times of Karola Szilvássy, Transylvanian Aristocrat and Modern Woman* Réka M. Cristian Abstract: In this study Cristian surveys the life and work of Baroness Elemérné Bornemissza, née Karola Szilvássy (1876 – 1948), an internationalist Transylvanian aristocrat, primarily known as the famous literary patron of Erdélyi Helikon and lifelong muse of Count Miklós Bánffy de Losoncz, who immortalized her through the character of Adrienne Milóth in his Erdélyi trilógia [‘The Transylvanian Trilogy’]. Research on Karola Szilvássy is still scarce with little known about the life of this maverick woman, who did not comply with the norms of her society. She was an actress and film director during the silent film era, courageous nurse in the World War I, as well as unusual fashion trendsetter, gourmet cookbook writer, Africa traveler—in short, a source of inspiration for many women of her time, and after. Keywords: Karola Szilvássy, Miklós Bánffy, János Kemény, Zoltán Óváry, Transylvanian aristocracy, modern woman, suffrage, polyglot, cosmopolitan, Erdélyi Helikon Biography: Réka M. Cristian is Associate Professor, Chair of the American Studies Department, University of Szeged, and Co-chair of the university’s Inter-American Research Center. She is author of Cultural Vistas and Sites of Identity: Literature, Film and American Studies (2011), co-author (with Zoltán Dragon) of Encounters of the Filmic Kind: Guidebook to Film Theories (2008), and general editor of AMERICANA E-Journal of American Studies in Hungary, as well as its e-book division, AMERICANA eBooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Eugene V. Thaw, 2007 October 1-2
    Oral history interview with Eugene V. Thaw, 2007 October 1-2 Funding for this interview provided by Art Dealers Association of America. Funding for the digital preservation of this interview was provided by a grant from the Save America's Treasures Program of the National Park Service. Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Preface The following oral history transcript is the result of a digitally-recorded interview with Eugene Thaw on October 1 and 2, 2007. The interview took place at the dealer's home in New York, New York, and was conducted by James McElhinney for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. Funding for this interview was provided by a grant from the Art Dealers Association of America. Eugene Thaw and James McElhinney have reviewed the transcript and have made corrections and emendations. The reader should bear in mind that he or she is reading a transcript of spoken, rather than written, prose. Interview JAMES MCELHINNEY: This is James McElhinney interviewing Eugene Thaw at his home at 726 Park Avenue in New York, on October 1, 2007. Good morning, sir. EUGENE THAW: Good morning. MR. MCELHINNEY: Where and when were you born? MR. THAW: I was born October 27, 1927. And I was born in New York, uptown, in the Washington Heights area. And it's just 80 years ago. MR. MCELHINNEY: Well, happy birthday. That was just a few days ago. MR. THAW: No, it will be the 27th of October. MR. MCELHINNEY: Oh, of October.
    [Show full text]
  • Fidelity National Title Ins. Co. V. Woody Creek Ventures
    FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY v. WOODY CREEK VENT ... Page 1 of 8 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, Plaintiff Counter Defendant-Appellee, v. WOODY CREEK VENTURES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendant Counterclaimant-Appellant, and PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., a Colorado corporation, Defendant. No. 14-1274. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 26, 2016. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado; (D.C. No. 1:13-CV-01289-RBJ). Eric E. Torgersen (Dennis B. Polk, and Melissa R. Liff, with him on the briefs), Holley, Albertson & Polk, P.C., Lakewood, Colorado, for Defendant Counterclaimant-Appellant. Adam P. O'Brien (Marilyn S. Chappell, with him on the brief), Wells, Anderson & Race, LLC, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff Counter Defendant-Appellee. Before HARTZ, PHILLIPS, and MORITZ, Circuit Judges. MORITZ, Circuit Judge. This suit requires us to interpret two provisions of a title insurance policy underwritten by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company—one provision insures against unmarketability of title and the other insures against a lack of access to property. The owner of the policy, Woody Creek Ventures, LLC, contends that both provisions covered losses it sustained when it learned, after purchasing two parcels of land, that one parcel lacked permanent access. And although Fidelity obtained a 30-year right-of-way grant to that parcel, Woody Creek maintains Fidelity failed to cure the lack of access and the title remained unmarketable. Because we agree with the district court's conclusions that (1) the policy doesn't insure a permanent right of access, (2) the right-of-way cured the lack of access to the parcel, and (3) the lack of permanent access doesn't render Woody Creek's title unmarketable, we affirm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Times of the Berlin Secession Podcast
    Lindenwood University Digital Commons@Lindenwood University Theses Theses & Dissertations Spring 5-2021 The Life and Times of the Berlin Secession Podcast Chris Kitamura Lindenwood University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/theses Part of the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons Recommended Citation Kitamura, Chris, "The Life and Times of the Berlin Secession Podcast" (2021). Theses. 7. https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/theses/7 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses & Dissertations at Digital Commons@Lindenwood University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Lindenwood University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lindenwood University School of Arts, Media, and Communications THE LIFE AND TIMES OF THE BERLIN SECESSION PODCAST by Chris Kitamura Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master Arts in Art History At Lindenwood University May 2021, Christopher Kitamura The author hereby grants Lindenwood University permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic thesis copies of document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. 2 2 Chris Kitamura______________________________________________4/22/21 Author Kelly Scheffer _________________________________________________ Committee chair Dr. Piper Hutson__________________________________________________4/27/2021 Committee member 4/27/21 Clayton
    [Show full text]
  • Violations of Zoning Ordinances, the Covenant Against Encumbrances, and Marketability of Title: How Purchasers Can Be Better Protected
    VIOLATIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCES, THE COVENANT AGAINST ENCUMBRANCES, AND MARKETABILITY OF TITLE: HOW PURCHASERS CAN BE BETTER PROTECTED Jessica P. Wilde∗ I. INTRODUCTION Zoning ordinances function as an exercise of the government’s general police power, sustaining the enjoyment, health, and safety of the public. They are important in order to maintain property values and protect a neighborhood’s quality and environment.1 Zoning ordinances prevent people from using their property in a way that would make a neighborhood less enjoyable.2 State statutes often provide civil and criminal penalties for failing to comply with zoning ordinances.3 Noncompliance with existing ordinances may be of concern to a buyer who buys a parcel of land ∗ J.D. candidate, Touro Law Center, May 2007; B.S., Brigham Young University, May 2004. 1 See ROBERT H. NELSON, ZONING AND PROPERTY RIGHTS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE AMERICAN SYSTEM OF LAND USE REGULATION 11-12 (1977). 2 Id. They are often enacted for safety purposes; for example, a zoning ordinance prevents commercial use in a residential neighborhood or may require a permit or certificate of occupancy before a building is occupied. In addition, a zoning ordinance may be in the form of a building code, requiring that the building maintain certain requirements for fire code purposes. Ordinances serve an array of important functions in order to maintain the value and enjoyment of a neighborhood, as well as facilitate the safety and health of the public. 3 Adam Forman, Comment, What You Can’t See Can Hurt You: Do Latent Violations of a Restrictive Land Use Ordinance, Existing Upon Conveyance, Constitute a Breach of the Covenant Against Encumbrances? 64 ALB.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Case: 15-55550, 07/10/2017, ID: 10502017, DktEntry: 127-1, Page 1 of 61 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID CASSIRER; AVA CASSIRER; No. 15-55550 UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN 15-55977 DIEGO COUNTY, a California non- profit corporation, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 2:05-cv-03459- JFW-E v. THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA COLLECTION FOUNDATION, an agency or instrumentality of the Kingdom of Spain, Defendant-Appellant. DAVID CASSIRER; AVA CASSIRER; No. 15-55951 UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, a California non- D.C. No. profit corporation, 2:05-cv-03459- Plaintiffs-Appellants, JFW-E v. OPINION THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA COLLECTION FOUNDATION, an agency or instrumentality of the Kingdom of Spain, Defendant-Appellee. Case: 15-55550, 07/10/2017, ID: 10502017, DktEntry: 127-1, Page 2 of 61 2 CASSIRER V. THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA COLLECTION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted December 5, 2016 Pasadena, California Filed July 10, 2017 Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, Carlos T. Bea, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Bea Case: 15-55550, 07/10/2017, ID: 10502017, DktEntry: 127-1, Page 3 of 61 CASSIRER V. THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA COLLECTION 3 SUMMARY* Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act / Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act The panel reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment, on remand, in favor of Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, the defendant in an action under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act concerning a Camille Pissarro painting that was forcibly taken from the plaintiffs’ great-grandmother by an art dealer who had been appointed by the Nazi government to conduct an appraisal.
    [Show full text]