Getting in Early: Lessons of the Collins Submarine Program for Improved Oversight of Defence Procurement ISSN 1328-7478

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Getting in Early: Lessons of the Collins Submarine Program for Improved Oversight of Defence Procurement ISSN 1328-7478 Department of the INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES Parliamentary Library Research Paper No. 3 2001–02 Getting in Early: Lessons of the Collins Submarine Program for Improved Oversight of Defence Procurement ISSN 1328-7478 Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2001 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 2001 I NFORMATION AND R ESEARCH S ERVICES Research Paper No. 3 2001–02 Getting in Early: Lessons of the Collins Submarine Program for Improved Oversight of Defence Procurement Derek Woolner Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Group 18 September 2001 Acknowledgments This is to acknowledge the help given in producing a paper, Laura Rayner, Dr Ravi Tomar, Gary Brown, Ian Ireland, Dr John Carter and Dr Ross Babbage. Enquiries Information and Research Services publications are available on the ParlInfo database. On the Internet the Department of the Parliamentary Library can be found at: http://www.aph.gov.au/library/ IRS Publications Office Telephone: (02) 6277 2778 Contents Major Issues ......................................................... i Unresolved Issue: The Future of the Submarine Building Industry ............... i Unresolved Issue: The Need for a Workable Combat System ...................ii What Really Went Wrong with the Collins Program......................... iii Only One Amongst Many: Ongoing Problems in Defence Procurement .......... iv The Need for New Processes of Parliamentary Oversight ......................v Introduction .........................................................1 Background .........................................................3 Early Days ........................................................3 Experience With the Oberon Submarines..................................3 The High Cost and Limitations of the Oberons ...........................4 Why the Collins Turned Out as it Did: Trends Set During Early Development .........4 The Dominating Influence of the Decision to Build in Australia .................5 Bi-Partisan Political Support.........................................6 Consequences .....................................................6 The Contract a Result of the 1980s Procurement Environment ................6 The Influence of a Succession of Disasters ............................7 Fixed-price Contracting as an Apparent Solution........................7 Industrial Credibility as a Selection Imperative ...........................7 A Search for a Break from the Past..................................8 Lobbying in Favour of Industrial Capability ...........................8 Combat Data System ................................................9 Origins of the CDS Concept .........................................9 Difficulties in Selecting a Supplier ................................... 10 Early Assumptions and Subsequent Failure ............................. 10 The Critical Point—Failing to Change the Procurement Strategy................11 Original Low Risk Approach .......................................11 Opting for the Ideal Rather Than the Available ..........................11 Cost Escalation and Program Delay .....................................12 Failure to Acknowledge Higher Risk..................................13 Achievements and Problems: Pointers to Decision Making? .....................13 A Significant Achievement: Building the Submarines in Australia ..............13 Performance of World Standard .....................................14 Unusually High Self Reliance.....................................14 Fostering Australian Industrial Expertise.............................14 Some Disasters Avoided: How the Other Competitors Fared ................15 Past Glory; Present Problem? .......................................16 The Threat of Declining Workload .................................16 The Government Decides to Award Ongoing Refit Work.................17 A Future with the US? ............................................17 The Buy Out of Kockums........................................17 The American Option...........................................18 Risks in the Tension Between US and European Suppliers ................18 Does Australian Have Access to Sufficient Intellectual Capital?............19 Performance ......................................................19 The Performance Advantages of Size .................................19 Range and Endurance...........................................20 Submerged Endurance and Indiscretion Ratio .........................20 Noise Control and Stealth ..........................................21 Impressing the Americans .......................................22 Problems, Deficiencies and Failures: Shortcomings in Performance ...........22 Component Failures ..............................................23 Uniquely Specified Sub-Systems ..................................23 The Diesel Engines ............................................24 The Nature of Diesel Engine Problems ..............................24 Deficiencies a Consequence of Overall Design Objectives ................25 Hull Generated Noise............................................. 25 Why Submarines Usually Proceed Slowly............................ 25 Sources of Noise at High-Speed ................................... 26 An Outcome Influenced by Other Objectives ......................... 27 The Combat System .............................................. 27 Failure of the Original System .................................... 27 Agreement on Need for a New System .............................. 28 Selection of a Preferred New System ............................... 28 Back to Square One—Replacement Combat System Program Abandoned......... 29 The US Influence................................................ 29 Moving Against the Trends ........................................ 30 Growth of Multinational Approaches in Defence Systems ................ 30 Consequences for Australian Industry............................... 31 Issues of Wider Strategic Concern ................................... 31 The American Need for More Submarines ........................... 31 Submarine Operations with the US ................................. 32 Risks to the Defence White Paper Structure .......................... 32 Return to the Challenges of the Past—High Risk with Lock-in............... 33 Areas of Risk ................................................ 33 Differences Between Nuclear and Conventional Submarines .............. 33 The Critical Importance of Local Support .............................. 34 The Primary Importance of Intellectual Capital ........................ 34 The Atlas Proposal for Building Intellectual Capital .................... 35 The American Route Not Guaranteed ................................. 35 Where the Problem of the Collins Submarines Lies ........................... 36 An Inappropriate Procurement Strategy .................................. 36 Problems That Could Have Been Ameliorated ............................. 36 Consequences of Mistakes ........................................... 37 An Excellent Potential Yet to Be Realised ................................ 37 Why the Collins is Important—Australia's Declining Surface Navy................ 38 Reduced Planning Objectives ......................................... 38 Declining Fleet Numbers.............................................39 Implications for Policy and Naval Doctrine ...............................39 Why the Collins is Important—The Collins Syndrome and Australian Defence Procurement .......................................................40 The Worst Defence Procurement Programs ...............................40 Poor Management and the 'Orphan Systems' Syndrome ....................40 A Recent Example—The ANZAC Helicopter Program ....................41 The Implications for the White Paper of Poor Acquisitions Management..........41 Identifying High Risk Programs-the Example of the AEW&C Program ........42 Cost Increases in the AEW&C Project ..............................42 Risk Factors in the AEW&C Program...............................42 Internal Criticisms of Defence Procurement Management.....................43 Too Many Uniquely Australian Systems ...............................43 Government Changes to Procurement Procedures...........................44 Early Involvement
Recommended publications
  • Aug-Sep-Oct 1968
    THE NAVY The magazine of the Navy League of Australia When you're flying (Registered >n Australia for transmission by post as o Periodical) off to the other side of the world Vol. 30 AUGUST-SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER, 1968 No. 3 PagCONTENTe S Pago for the very first time it's nice A Great Navy in Southern Seas — Book Review — "The Far and the Victoria's Colonial Fleet 7 Deep" 61 Background of the DX/DXG Pro- Helicopter-Destroyers for the to go with someone you know. gramme 25 R.A.N. 63 Australia's Navy in South Vietnam 31 Charts for all Nations 67 Navy Week in Australia and H.M.A.S. Melbourne nears end of Papua & New Guinea — Pro- refit 73 grammes 38 Navy League of Australia — An- Sea Cadet Corps News — New nual Report—Victoria Division 79 South Wales Division 43 What's New 83 Periscope on Australia 49 A Glimpse of our Maritime Future R7 Novy League of Australia—Annu- Future Role of the Soviet Navy 89 al Report — N.S.W. Division 57 News from Britain 93 Plus sundry stories and photographs The views expressed in articles appearing in this publication are those of the authors concerned They do not necessarily represent the views of the editor, the Navy League, or official opinions or policy Published by the Navy League of Australia, 66 Claronce Street, Sydney, N.S.W., 2000; Tel.: 29-6531 Postal Address: Box 1719. G.P.O., Sydney, N.S.W., 2001 EDITOR: Dennis P. Trickett, Esq., Box CI 78, Claronce Street Post Office, Sydney, N.S.W., 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Person Name - Prefix a Table of Salutations That May Precede an Individual’S Name to Identify Social Status
    Person Name - Prefix A table of salutations that may precede an individual’s name to identify social status. Accurate and uniform information is key to exchanging data. The table below is the recommended format for an individuals name prefix. Note: Military abbreviations are provided in Non Department of National Defence writing format as per "The Canadian Style, A Guide to Writing and Editing" published in 1997. Prefix Abbreviation Second Lieutenant 2nd Lieut. Acting Sub-Lieutenant Acting Sub-Lieutenant Able Seaman A.B. Abbot Ab. Archbishop Abp. Admiral Admiral Brigadier-General Brig.-Gen Brother Bro. Base Chief Petty Officer BsCPO Captain Capt. Commander Cmdr. Chief Chief Commodore Commodore Colonel Col. Constable Const. Corporal Cpl. Chief Petty Officer 1st class Chief Petty Officer, 1st class Chief Petty Officer 2nd class Chief Petty Officer, 2nd class Constable Cst. Chief Warrant Officer Chief Warrant Officer Doctor Dr. Bishop (Episcopus) Episc Your Excellency Exc. Father Fr. General Gen. Her Worship Her Worship Her Excellency HerEx His Worship His Worship His Excellency HisEx Honourable Hon. Lieutenant-Commander Lt.-Cmdr Lieutenant-Colonel Lt.-Col Lieutenant-General Lt.-Gen Leading Seaman L.S. Lieutenant Lieut. Monsieur M. Person Name - Prefix Prefix Abbreviation Master Ma. Madam Madam Major Maj. Mayor Mayor Master Corporal Master Corporal Major-General Maj.-Gen Miss Miss Mademoiselle Mlle. Madame Mme. Mister Mr. Mistress Mrs. Ms Ms. Master Seaman M.S. Monsignor Msgr. Monsieur Mssr. Master Mstr Master Warrant Officer Master Warrant Officer Naval Cadet Naval Cadet Officer Cadet Officer Cadet Ordinary Seaman O.S. Petty Officer, 1st class Petty Officer, 1st class Petty Officer, 2nd class Petty Officer, 2nd class Professor Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 48, December 2020
    From the President Welcome to this edition of Call the Hands, our last in the Society’s 50th anniversary year. It includes a variety of short articles which are connected through various themes including the RAN’s first ship, HMAS Parramatta (I) and her namesakes. Another connection is the shared anniversary of the Naval Association of Australia (NAA) celebrating its 100th anniversary. Accordingly, we acknowledge our many readers who are members of the NAA. Their service in the RAN (past and present) has contributed to the history of Australia’s great Navy. The Society’s close connection with Parramatta (I) stems from the not insignificant project to recover her bow and stern sections from a Hawksbury River mudflat. These sections are now prominently displayed in Sydney. Additional information about this fascinating project recently came to light and has been published in the December Naval Historical Review now being distributed to members. We also feature a recent NAA commemorative service for HMAS Parramatta (II) and recognition of the commissioning commanding officer of HMAS Parramatta (III), Rear Admiral Guy Griffiths RAN, Rtd. Many interesting and sometimes obscure naval stories remain untold. Occasional paper 97 is a good example. It is the story of a small party of sailors landed in Arnhem Land from HMAS Fremantle (I) in 1958 to observe Japanese pearl fishing operations. This story was shared by Eric Deshon with Australian National Maritime Museum’s oral history volunteers and published in the ANMM’s volunteer newsletter ‘All Hands’ in June 2018. Recording historic events on canvas has been a traditional art form which continues today.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Layout 31 KH.Indd
    hidden assets contents 4 evolution of the submarine 8 submarines in australia 10 collins class project 14 collins class submarines 16 submarine construction 18 role of submarines 20 relative complexity of submarines 22 submarines of the future 3 While it is widely considered that William Borne designed the first submarine in 1578, it was Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) who initially developed the idea of a military vessel evolution that could submerge under water to attack enemy ships. However, it wasn’t until 1776 that the first submarine to make an attack on an enemy ship was built. Named the Turtle, it was designed by David Bushnell and was built with the intention of breaking the British of the submarine naval blockade in New York Harbor during the American Revolution. Operated by Sergeant Ezra Lee, the Turtle made an unsuccessful attack on a British ship on 7 September 1776. Several more submarines were attempted over the years, but it wasn’t until the beginning of the 20th century that modern day submarine warfare was born. At the start of World War I, submarines were still in their infancy. Considered to be ‘unethical’ and not fitting into the conventional rules of war, few foresaw the watershed in naval warfare that submarines were to bring about. Once their true capabilities were realised, submarines had a substantial impact on World War I: sinking ships, laying mines, blockading ports and providing escorts to trans-Atlantic convoys. During World War II, submarine technology advanced significantly. The Germans, who were operating U-Boats in the Atlantic Ocean, developed the ‘snorkel’ (allowing the boat to recharge its batteries while staying submerged).
    [Show full text]
  • Terms of Reference a the Reasons Why Australian Veterans Are Committing Suicide at Such High Rates
    1 SENATE FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO SUICIDE BY VETERANS AND EX-SERVICE PERSONNEL Submitted by: Name withheld Terms of reference A The Reasons why Australian Veterans are Committing Suicide at Such High Rates. This term of reference acknowledges that Australian veterans are committing suicide at high rates, but provides no figures on the actual numbers of suicides. This is because neither the ADF nor DVA record actual suicides of veterans. This is a matter of serious concern for veterans, their families and in fact the Australian nation. If the US can record accurate data on suicides of its veterans, then so too can Australia. Perhaps the ADF and DVA have taken a conscious decision not to record these figures. I feel the following excerpts from an article by David Ellery in the Sydney Morning Herald, 7 June 2015, titled Alarming' rise in suicide deaths by former military personnel, are very relevant to this Inquiry, Refer: http://www.smh.com.au/national/alarming-rise-in-suicide-deaths-by-former-military- personnel-20150605-ghhfut.html Despite Defence's multibillion-dollar resources, Vice Chief of Defence Force, Vice Admiral Ray Griggs said: "What is the suicide rate amongst the ex-serving community? We just don't know ... People get very energetic and say `you should know'. Well, we'd love to know." The ADF was scrambling to plug the information black hole by working with a wide range of stakeholders, including a grassroots suicide register whose founder said his job was "speaking for the dead". Admiral Griggs, said “he did not believe claims held up that as many as 200 Afghan war veterans had committed suicide”.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert J. Baciocco, Jr. Vice Admiral, US Navy (Retired)
    Albert J. Baciocco, Jr. Vice Admiral, U. S. Navy (Retired) - - - - Vice Admiral Baciocco was born in San Francisco, California, on March 4, 1931. He graduated from Lowell High School and was accepted into Stanford University prior to entering the United States Naval Academy at Annapolis, Maryland, in June 1949. He graduated from the Naval Academy in June 1953 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering, and completed graduate level studies in the field of nuclear engineering in 1958 as part of his training for the naval nuclear propulsion program. Admiral Baciocco served initially in the heavy cruiser USS SAINT PAUL (CA73) during the final days of the Korean War, and then in the diesel submarine USS WAHOO (SS565) until April of 1957 when he became one of the early officer selectees for the Navy's nuclear submarine program. After completion of his nuclear training, he served in the commissioning crews of three nuclear attack submarines: USS SCORPION (SSN589), as Main Propulsion Assistant (1959-1961); USS BARB (SSN596), as Engineer Officer (1961-1962), then as Executive Officer (1963- 1965); and USS GATO (SSN615), as Commanding Officer (1965-1969). Subsequent at-sea assignments, all headquartered in Charleston, South Carolina, included COMMANDER SUBMARINE DIVISION FORTY-TWO (1969-1971), where he was responsible for the operational training readiness of six SSNs; COMMANDER SUBMARINE SQUADRON FOUR (1974-1976), where he was responsible for the operational and material readiness of fifteen SSNs; and COMMANDER SUBMARINE GROUP SIX (1981-1983), where, during the height of the Cold War, he was accountable for the overall readiness of a major portion of the Atlantic Fleet submarine force, including forty SSNs, 20 SSBNs, and various other submarine force commands totaling approximately 20,000 military personnel, among which numbered some forty strategic submarine crews.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece Announces Major Arms Purchase
    Greece announces major arms purchase As Mr Mitsotakis said at the TIF (Thessaloniki International Fair which is not being held this year due to the pandemic, but the venue as a podium for political declarations was kept).: “In recent years, the defense sector has experienced conditions of disinvestment, after a period of high costs and not always targeted armaments procurements. Well, it's time to balance needs and opportunities. It is time to strengthen the Armed Forces as a legacy for the security of the country, but also as the highest obligation to the Greeks who will bear the cost. It is the price of our place on the map. Today, therefore, I am announcing six emblematic decisions that multiply the power, functionality and effectiveness of Greek weapons.” The six decisions announced by PM Mitsotakis: 1. The Hellenic Air Force will immediately acquires a squadron of 18 Rafale fighter jets that will replace older Mirage 2000 fighters. As the Greek PM said these are fourth generation superior aircraft that “strengthen Greek deterrent power... in combination with the modernized F-16” 2. The Hellenic Navy is launching the process for the procurement of four new multi-role frigates, while at the same time, it will modernize and upgrade four existing MEKO frigates. Mr Mitsotakis left open, what these ships will be, and several countries are looking at the tender for their own shipyards, or design bureaus. The new ships will also be accompanied by four MH-60R (Romeo) naval helicopters. 3. The arsenal of the three branches is being enriched as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • MARITIME Security &Defence M
    June MARITIME 2021 a7.50 Security D 14974 E &Defence MSD From the Sea and Beyond ISSN 1617-7983 • Key Developments in... • Amphibious Warfare www.maritime-security-defence.com • • Asia‘s Power Balance MITTLER • European Submarines June 2021 • Port Security REPORT NAVAL GROUP DESIGNS, BUILDS AND MAINTAINS SUBMARINES AND SURFACE SHIPS ALL AROUND THE WORLD. Leveraging this unique expertise and our proven track-record in international cooperation, we are ready to build and foster partnerships with navies, industry and knowledge partners. Sovereignty, Innovation, Operational excellence : our common future will be made of challenges, passion & engagement. POWER AT SEA WWW.NAVAL-GROUP.COM - Design : Seenk Naval Group - Crédit photo : ©Naval Group, ©Marine Nationale, © Ewan Lebourdais NAVAL_GROUP_AP_2020_dual-GB_210x297.indd 1 28/05/2021 11:49 Editorial Hard Choices in the New Cold War Era The last decade has seen many of the foundations on which post-Cold War navies were constructed start to become eroded. The victory of the United States and its Western Allies in the unfought war with the Soviet Union heralded a new era in which navies could forsake many of the demands of Photo: author preparing for high intensity warfare. Helping to ensure the security of the maritime shipping networks that continue to dominate global trade and the vast resources of emerging EEZs from asymmetric challenges arguably became many navies’ primary raison d’être. Fleets became focused on collabora- tive global stabilisation far from home and structured their assets accordingly. Perhaps the most extreme example of this trend has been the German Navy’s F125 BADEN-WÜRTTEMBERG class frig- ates – hugely sophisticated and expensive ships designed to prevail only in lower threat environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Joint Approach Past, Present and Future
    Australia’s Joint Approach Past, Present and Future Joint Studies Paper Series No. 1 Tim McKenna & Tim McKay This page is intentionally blank AUSTRALIA’S JOINT APPROACH PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE by Tim McKenna & Tim McKay Foreword Welcome to Defence’s Joint Studies Paper Series, launched as we continue the strategic shift towards the Australian Defence Force (ADF) being a more integrated joint force. This series aims to broaden and deepen our ideas about joint and focus our vision through a single warfighting lens. The ADF’s activities have not existed this coherently in the joint context for quite some time. With the innovative ideas presented in these pages and those of future submissions, we are aiming to provoke debate on strategy-led and evidence-based ideas for the potent, agile and capable joint future force. The simple nature of ‘joint’—‘shared, held, or made by two or more together’—means it cannot occur in splendid isolation. We need to draw on experts and information sources both from within the Department of Defence and beyond; from Core Agencies, academia, industry and our allied partners. You are the experts within your domains; we respect that, and need your engagement to tell a full story. We encourage the submission of detailed research papers examining the elements of Australian Defence ‘jointness’—officially defined as ‘activities, operations and organisations in which elements of at least two Services participate’, and which is reliant upon support from the Australian Public Service, industry and other government agencies. This series expands on the success of the three Services, which have each published research papers that have enhanced ADF understanding and practice in the sea, land, air and space domains.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Submarines from 1914 Africa's Indian Ocean Navies: Naval
    ISSUE 152 JUNE 2014 Australian Submarines from 1914 Africa’s Indian Ocean Navies: Naval evolution in a complex and volatile region The Aussie military history your kids aren’t learning Cooperation or Trust: What comes first in the South China Sea? Israel Navy Dolphin-II class submarine Netherlands-Belgian Naval Squadron World Naval Developments The War of 1812: What it Means to the United States Flying the ASEAN Flag Centenary of ANZAC (Navy) The Far Flank of the Indo-Pacific: India and China in the South-West Pacific Confrontation at Sea: The Midshipman Who Almost Shot ‘The General’ JOURNAL OF THE Sponsorship_Ad_Outlines.indd 1 30/11/2013 10:43:20 PM Issue 152 3 Letter to the Editor Contents Dear Readers, As before, we require you to Australian Submarines from 1914 4 Headmark is going through conform to the Style Notes and other some changes. It will henceforth be guidelines printed at the back of the published constantly online, and paper edition, and also to be found on Africa’s Indian Ocean Navies: Naval in print twice a year, for June and the website. evolution in a complex and volatile December. The changes will bring more region 11 Publishing online will mean a steady immediacy, and less costs to the stream of articles reaching the website, ANI. Publishing world-wide is going The Aussie military history your kids which you can access at: through changes, and we are also aren’t learning 17 www.navalinstitute.com.au altering ourselves to best fit the new ANI members will have access to world.
    [Show full text]
  • Defgram 182/2018 Incoming Defence Senior Leadership Team Announced
    UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED UNCLASSIFIED Department of Defence Active DEFGRAM 182/2018 Issue date: 16 April 2018 Expiry date: 13 July 2018 INCOMING DEFENCE SENIOR LEADERSHIP TEAM ANNOUNCED Incoming Chief of the Defence Force, Vice Chief of the Defence Force, Chief of Navy, Chief of Army and Chief Joint Operations Announced 1. Further to the Prime Minister's press conference, the incoming Defence Senior Leadership Team has now been announced. 2. Lieutenant General Angus Campbell, AO, DSC on promotion to General, will be appointed as the Chief of the Defence Force. Lieutenant General Campbell will be reaching this milestone after 32 years of service with the Australian Regular Army. His extensive military career has included a number of senior roles, such as Head Military Strategic Commitments, Deputy Chief of Army and Commander Joint Agency Task Force. In his current appointment, as Chief of Army, Lieutenant General Campbell has been a driving force in cultural reform, with a specific focus on achieving equal opportunities and addressing domestic violence. His well-respected military career, in addition to his experience working in National Security, for the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, make him ideally suited to lead the organisation in further reform and in embedding One Defence. 3. Vice Admiral David Johnston, AO, RAN will be appointed as the Vice Chief of the Defence Force. Vice Admiral Johnston has been serving with the Royal Australian Navy since 1978 and has recently been awarded his Federation Star. His highly esteemed military career has seen him in a number of senior appointments, including Deputy Chief Joint Operations, Commander Border Protection Command and most recently, Chief Joint Operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Topics VIRTUAL TOURS VIRTUAL TOUR of the DESTROYER HMAS VAMPIRE the Last of the Big-Gun Destroyers
    Speaker Topics VIRTUAL TOURS VIRTUAL TOUR OF THE DESTROYER HMAS VAMPIRE The last of the big-gun destroyers. Come aboard to find out what life was like for officers and sailors. Also learn the operation of the guns, boiler and engine rooms and how the ship was commanded. VIRTUAL TOUR OF THE SUBMARINE HMAS ONSLOW Explore the museum’s diesel/electric powered Oberon class submarine. See what it was like to live in the confined spaces of an ex-RAN submarine and how the vessel performed her silent service. VIRTUAL TOUR OF THE HMB ENDEAVOUR Come aboard the pride of the museum’s fleet, an authentic replica of the ship in which Cook explored the east coast of Australia. Hear the stories of life on board for the captain and crew and gain an understanding of how an 18th-century sailing ship operated. VIRTUAL TOUR OF THE MUSEUM GALLERIES Join us for a virtual stroll through the museum galleries and get a peek at and an understanding of the amazing maritime treasures on display. KEY NAVY EVENTS WWI HMAS SYDNEY/SMS EMDEN BATTLE First Victory – Battle of the Cocos Islands. Find out how HMAS Sydney achieved the Royal Australian Navy’s first victory at sea at the start of WWI, how the battle unfolded, the aftermath and the strategic importance of the victory for Australia. DAMN THE DARDANELLES. THE ROLE OF THE NAVY AT GALLIPOLI AND THE AUSTRALIAN SUBMARINE AE2 The contribution of the navy, including British, French and Australian vessels, has been largely overlooked under the weight of the army narrative.
    [Show full text]