Biodiversity Blitzblitz Environment and Natural Resources Vovollunteer Newsletternewsletter——Especialespecial Editionedition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biodiversity Blitzblitz Environment and Natural Resources Vovollunteer Newsletternewsletter——Especialespecial Editionedition NorthernNorthern andand YorkeYorke RegionRegion Department of BiodiversityBiodiversity BlitzBlitz Environment and Natural Resources VoVollunteer NewsletterNewsletter——EspecialEspecial EditionEdition Surveys during fall pit in Captured O’Brien Casey Possum Photo: Pygmy Message from the Yorke District Staff! The Innes National Park Biodiversity Blitz provided a wonderful opportunity to showcase the parks rich diversity of plant and animal life. During the event, volunteers and staff had the opportunity to work side by side to undertake a variety of survey and vegetation management activities and the results were outstanding. Through working together and learning from each other, we were able to take photos of the elusive Western Whipbird, discover active Mallefowl nests, trap tiny Pygmy Possums and identify pairs of Hooded Plovers while enjoying stunning coastal scenery. I would like to sincerely thank each individual volunteer who attended the Biodiversity Blitz, assisted in the collection of invaluable information on a variety of endangered species, and shared with us their stories. A particular highlight for me was seeing a large number children and adults who have had lim‐ ited opportunity to be involved in this type of work, get out and get dirty. I look forward to seeing each of you again in the park, whether it be as a volunteer or visitor enjoying the spectacular scenery, camp‐ ing, surfing or fishing opportunities that Innes National Park has to offer. Yours Sincerely Justin Holmes District Ranger, Yorke 1 Small Mammals and Reptiles……………………….. By David Armstrong Summary of reptile and mammal records obtained during the Bio Blitz at Innes NP 9‐14/10/2011 Cole©11 Chad line Total fall IB IBB00201 Op IBB00401 IBB00501 IBB00601 IBB00101 IBB00301 Photo: Pit B0 IBB IBB IBB IBB0 IBB porOpportunistic 01 002 003 004 050 006 tun 01 01 01 01 1 01 e Total COMMON NAME SPECIES NAME Reptiles Ctenophorus Prickly Dragon chapmani 1 1 1 3 Yellow‐faced Whip Demansia Snake psammophis 1 1 Diplodactylus South Coast Gecko calcicolus 2 2 4 Four‐toed Earless Skink Hemiergis peronii 3 1 3 2 9 Southern Four‐toed Slider Lerista dorsalis 1 1 2 Bull Skink Liopholis multiscutata 4 4 Dwarf Skink Menetia greyi 2 1 3 2 2 1 11 Mallee Snake‐eye Morethia obscura 2 1 3 Eastern Bearded Dragon Pogona barbata 1 1 Common Scaly‐foot Pygopus lepidopodus 1 1 Pseudonaja Peninsula Brown Snake inframacula 1 1 2 Sleepy Lizard Tiliqua rugosa 1 1 2 43 Mammals Western Pygmy‐ possum Cercartetus concinnus 7 10 3 5 1 3 29 Chocolate Wattled Bat Chalinolobus morio 2 4 6 Western Grey Kangaroo Macropus fuliginosus 2 2 1 5 House Mouse Mus musculus * 3 4 1 4 4 3 19 Rabbit (European Oryctolagus cuniculus Rabbit) * 1 1 Black Rat Rattus rattus * 2 1 3 63 * = feral or introduced species 2 REPTILES Although not possessing the level of reptile diversity of the arid and tropical parts of Australia, the species recorded in Innes NP are significant in that many have restricted and fragmented distributions in coastal areas and off‐shore is‐ lands, existing as a series of isolated populations. The mainland populations of a few are concentrated on lower Yorke and Eyre peninsulas. This is particularly evident for the two large venomous snakes, which are common in the Park, the black form of the Eastern Tiger Snake (Notechis scutatus) and the Peninsula Brown Snake (Pseudonaja in‐ framacula), one of which was caught in an Elliot trap during the Bio Blitz. Other species in this category, observed during Bio Blitz were Prickly Dragon (Ctenophorus chapmani), Bull Skink (Liopholis multiscutata) and South Coast Gecko (Diplodactylus calcicolus). This isolation was created by the South Coast Gecko increasing aridity of the Australian continent and associated Photo: Paul Williams rising sea level over the last 10, 000 ‐15,000 years. Previously these and other species would have been present to the edge of the continental shelf and further inland. Due to cooler weather than usual for the time of year, which restricts or prevents reptile activity, the Bio Blitz observed or trapped only 12 of the 23 reptile species officially recorded for Innes NP. However, this number may soon be increased by sightings of what is most likely Rosenberg’s Goanna (Varanus rosenbergi) reported by park staff. This is most likely the result of fox baiting reducing the numbers of both a predator and competitor of these large lizards. MAMMALS Most outstanding amongst the mammal records collected was the number of Western Pygmy‐possums in pitfall traps. These accounted for 29 (almost half) of the total of 63 mammals recorded. Of the 29 caught 24 were processed (weighed, sexed and marked) before release. There was a strong bias towards young males, with 19 males weighing from 6 to 10 gm (avg. 8.1 gm) and five females from 7 to 14.5 gm (avg. 10.4gm). Only the largest female at 14.5 gm was carrying pouch young. None of the 24 pygmy‐possums marked were recaptured, most likely indicating that they are highly mobile, rather than occupying fixed territories. The significant bias towards capture of young males may indicate that as the least critical individuals to the ongoing survival of the population, they are the most mobile, being kept on the move by larger individuals. It seems clear that Western Pygmy‐possums are the only small native partly ground dwelling mammal still existing within the park. Sub‐fossil remains (bones) from owl‐pellets retrieved from coastal caves or blown out sand dunes have provided evidence of the previous oc‐ currence in the area of 15 other mammal species, varying in size from small (mouse sized) rodents to Tam‐ mar Wallabies. Whilst the Tammar has been recently reintroduced, none of the others presently occur on Yorke Peninsula, although almost all still exist in other locations somewhere in Australia. Pygmy Possum *It is worth noting that no sightings or sign of foxes were Photo: Keith Baseley for Greening Australia, SA reported during the Bio Blitz. 3 3 Bio Blitz from an old volunteer perspective…………. By Jim Scott Having been on a couple of surveys in the past few years Joan and I thought we could enjoy another look at a part of the state. So we packed our van and set off for a 3 hour journey travelling through the fertile farm land of Yorke Peninsula. On arrival we were met by the smile on Cristina's face and directed to the camping ground just a couple of hundred metres from the Base Camp ‐The hall where most would bed down in virtual comfort with kitchen , hot showers , solid roof and smiling faces. At the first mealtime we were greeted by Caroline who fed us very well for the duration. Food is a great joy these days! On the following morning we were up bright and early for an 8:00 am start which became 9:00 am for the rest of the week. Over the 5 days (we could not make the whole week) we took part in a variety of completely different tasks in order to compile a list of flora and fauna in anticipation of a fuel reduction burn next autumn. Setting trap lines in designated areas and surveying the lines in the mornings, doing bird surveys in the bush, doing searches for hooded plovers on some magnificent beaches, weeding bridal veil infestations under the bushes (with ticks in residence) and learning of the indigenous perspective and history of the area. The trap lines were a familiar job having had the experience from earlier surveys but sometimes one is not prepared for the results. On the first morning we caught a couple of mice and on the third hole the cry went out “Pygmy Possums” and sure enough the captive was a possum with face and tail and whiskers but oh so much smaller than we were expecting. The captured animals were released at dusk so they were not in the sight of winged predators. Well worth the days effort! The next day was Hooded plovers ‐again not what we were expecting. Supposed to be rare but on every beach a pair had staked a claim whilst on one beach we sighted 9?? The beaches were a test for hikers though the sand being soft even at the waters edge which after a couple of hours tests the legs, the heart and the mind but all well worth the test but most of us chickened when one of the party said “I lost my binoculars” and no‐one breathed for a while. Our admiration of the rangers went up a fair bit when one volunteered to go in search of them, finding them at the extreme end of our survey. In all we were impressed by the sightings of mallee fowl, Tamar wallabies which had been relocated from New Zealand (Thanks for the talk on the project Andy) and proliferation of emu chicks due to the good seasons and fox baiting programs. As well as the fauna, the flora was quite varied and different to our locality. One other day we were taken on a tour of the park by one of the indigenous guides to observe the areas of importance and to be aware of such sites as water points camping sites and culturally important flora as well a learning of the origins before man arrived. Quite an enlightening session for people who had not had previous experience in the local history. Possibly though, the most enjoyable part of the week, was the social interaction between the people. They came from many interesting and various occupations ‐medical students, environmental engineers, rangers, retirees, young children, doctors, retired army veterans, park volunteers members of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources – as well as different nationalities, Spanish, Malaysian, Turkish, English, Uzbekistanian, Australian for example and the ages ranged from 73 down to about 3.
Recommended publications
  • The Socio-Ecology of Two Species of Australian Native Rodent—Notomys
    The socio-ecology of two species of Australian native rodent— Notomys mitchelli and Notomys alexis Clare Bradley PhD candidate Environmental Biology School of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Adelaide November 2008 Chapter One—Introduction 1. Introduction 1.1. Mammalian social systems Many mammal species live in social groups that can consist of related individuals, family groups, or unrelated animals (Alexander 1974). Animals aggregate in order to better survive and reproduce in their particular environment, possibly gaining from shared parental care, cooperative foraging, or a reduction in predation through increased vigilance (Berger & Stevens 1996; Clutton-Brock 1989a; Hughes 1998; Johnson et al. 2002; Kleiman 1977; see also Carr & Macdonald 1986). The basic determinant of social organisation in animals is the mating system, and mating systems of mammals are generally thought to be governed by the resources available in the habitat, since the distribution of resources determines the spatial distribution of females and this, in turn, determines the distribution of males (Clutton-Brock 1989a; Emlen & Oring 1977; Shier & Randall 2004; Trivers 1972; Wiens 1976; Wittenberger 1980). In very stable or predictable environments, where resources are uniformly distributed in space and time, females can be widely dispersed and monogamous mating systems are thought to be most likely (Emlen & Oring 1977; Keverne 1985; Kleiman 1977; Komers & Brotherton 1997; Reichard 2003). However, increasingly patchy resource distribution acts to ‘clump’ female distribution in areas of higher quality and promote polygynous systems (Clutton-Brock 1989a; Johnson et al. 2002; Orians 1969; Reynolds 1996). In such environments, a successful breeding strategy for a male is one where he can gain access to multiple females through controlling, in some way, the resources that govern the females’ dispersion (Greenwood 1980; Perrin & Mazalov 2000; The socio-ecology of two species of Australian native rodent—N.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Types
    Habitat Types The following section features ten predominant habitat types on the West Coast of the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. It provides a description of each habitat type and the native plant and fauna species that commonly occur there. The fauna species lists in this section are not limited to the species included in this publication and include other coastal fauna species. Fauna species included in this publication are printed in bold. Information is also provided on specific threats and reference sites for each habitat type. The habitat types presented are generally either characteristic of high-energy exposed coastline or low-energy sheltered coastline. Open sandy beaches, non-vegetated dunefields, coastal cliffs and cliff tops are all typically found along high energy, exposed coastline, while mangroves, sand flats and saltmarsh/samphire are characteristic of low energy, sheltered coastline. Habitat Types Coastal Dune Shrublands NATURAL DISTRIBUTION shrublands of larger vegetation occur on more stable dunes and Found throughout the coastal environment, from low beachfront cliff-top dunes with deep stable sand. Most large dune shrublands locations to elevated clifftops, wherever sand can accumulate. will be composed of a mosaic of transitional vegetation patches ranging from bare sand to dense shrub cover. DESCRIPTION This habitat type is associated with sandy coastal dunes occurring The understory generally consists of moderate to high diversity of along exposed and sometimes more sheltered coastline. Dunes are low shrubs, sedges and groundcovers. Understory diversity is often created by the deposition of dry sand particles from the beach by driven by the position and aspect of the dune slope.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of the Genus Pseudonaja (Reptilia: Elapidae) in Australia
    AUSTRALIAN BIODIVERSITY RECORD ________________________________________________________ 2002 (No 7) ISSN 1325-2992 March, 2002 ________________________________________________________ Taxonomy of the Genus Pseudonaja (Reptilia: Elapidae) in Australia. by Richard W. Wells “Shiralee”, Major West Road, Cowra, New South Wales, Australia The clear morphological differences that exist within the genus as previously considered strongly indicate that it is a polyphyletic assemblage. Accordingly, I have taken the step of formally proposing the fragmentation of Pseudonaja. In this work I have decided to restrict the genus Pseudonaja to the Pseudonaja nuchalis complex. Additionally, I herein formally resurrect from synonymy the generic name Euprepiosoma Fitzinger, 1860 for the textilis group of species, erect a new generic name (Placidaserpens gen. nov.) for the snakes previously regarded as Pseudonaja guttata, erect a new generic name (Notopseudonaja gen. nov.) for the group of species previously regarded as the Pseudonaja modesta complex, and erect a new generic name (Dugitophis gen. nov.) for snakes previously regarded as the Pseudonaja affinis complex. Genus Pseudonaja Gunther, 1858 The Pseudonaja nuchalis Complex It is usually reported that Pseudonaja nuchalis occurs across most of northern, central and western Australia, ranging from Cape York Peninsula, in the north-east, through western, southern and south-eastern Queensland, far western New South Wales, north-western Victoria, and most of South Australia, Northern Territory and Western Australia. However, this distribution pattern is now known to actually represents several different species all regarded by most authorities for convenience as the single highly variable species, 'Pseudonaja nuchalis'. As usually defined, this actually is a highly variable and therefore confusing group of species to identify and it is not all surprising that there has been difficulty in breaking up the group.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure±Function Properties of Venom Components from Australian Elapids
    PERGAMON Toxicon 37 (1999) 11±32 Review Structure±function properties of venom components from Australian elapids Bryan Grieg Fry * Peptide Laboratory, Centre for Drug Design and Development, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia Received 9 December 1997; accepted 4 March 1998 Abstract A comprehensive review of venom components isolated thus far from Australian elapids. Illustrated is that a tremendous structural homology exists among the components but this homology is not representative of the functional diversity. Further, the review illuminates the overlooked species and areas of research. # 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Australian elapids are well known to be the most toxic in the world, with all of the top ten and nineteen of the top 25 elapids with known LD50s residing exclusively on this continent (Broad et al., 1979). Thus far, three main types of venom components have been characterised from Australian elapids: prothrombin activating enzymes; lipases with a myriad of potent activities; and powerful peptidic neurotoxins. Many species have the prothrombin activating enzymes in their venoms, the vast majority contain phospholipase A2s and all Australian elapid venoms are suspected to contain peptidic neurotoxins. In addition to the profound neurological eects such as disorientation, ¯accid paralysis and respiratory failure, characteristic of bites by many species of Australian elapids is hemorrhaging and incoagulable blood. As a result, these elapids can be divided into two main classes: species with procoagulant venom (Table 1) and species with non-procoagulant venoms (Table 2) (Tan and * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. 0041-0101/98/$ - see front matter # 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Animal Species List
    Native animal species list Native animals in South Australia are categorised into one of four groups: • Unprotected • Exempt • Basic • Specialist. To find out the category your animal is in, please check the list below. However, Specialist animals are not listed. There are thousands of them, so we don’t carry a list. A Specialist animal is simply any native animal not listed in this document. Mammals Common name Zoological name Species code Category Dunnart Fat-tailed dunnart Sminthopsis crassicaudata A01072 Basic Dingo Wild dog Canis familiaris Not applicable Unprotected Gliders Squirrel glider Petaurus norfolcensis E04226 Basic Sugar glider Petaurus breviceps E01138 Basic Possum Common brushtail possum Trichosurus vulpecula K01113 Basic Potoroo and bettongs Brush-tailed bettong (Woylie) Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi M21002 Basic Long-nosed potoroo Potorous tridactylus Z01175 Basic Rufous bettong Aepyprymnus rufescens W01187 Basic Rodents Mitchell's hopping-mouse Notomys mitchellii Y01480 Basic Plains mouse (Rat) Pseudomys australis S01469 Basic Spinifex hopping-mouse Notomys alexis K01481 Exempt Wallabies Parma wallaby Macropus parma K01245 Basic Red-necked pademelon Thylogale thetis Y01236 Basic Red-necked wallaby Macropus rufogriseus K01261 Basic Swamp wallaby Wallabia bicolor E01242 Basic Tammar wallaby Macropus eugenii eugenii C05889 Basic Tasmanian pademelon Thylogale billardierii G01235 Basic 1 Amphibians Common name Zoological name Species code Category Southern bell frog Litoria raniformis G03207 Basic Smooth frog Geocrinia laevis
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN and YORKE REGIONAL NRM PLAN Volume A: State of The
    Northern and Yorke Natural Resources Management Board NORTHERN AND YORKE REGIONAL NRM PLAN Northern and Yorke NRM Board Yorke Northern and THE REGION REPORT OF STATE Volume A: State of the Region Report 2008 Acronyms CEM Coastal, Estuarine and Marine LCM Land Condition Monitoring CP Conservation Park MPA Marine Protected Area DEH Department for Environment and NP National Park Heritage NRM Natural Resources Management DPLG Department for Planning and Local N&Y Northern and Yorke Government SASPAS South Australian Soil and Plant DWLBC Department of Water, Land and Analysis Service Biodiversity Conservation WUE Water Use Efficiency March 2009 This document has been prepared by the Northern and Yorke Natural Resources Management Board and is not State Government policy. Editorial and design services have been provided by: • Rural Solutions SA • Peter R Day Resource Strategies • SUBStitution For more information, contact: Planning Officer Northern and Yorke NRM Board Phone: (08) 8636 2361 e-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-0-9806143-2-9 Copyright This publication is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior permission of the Northern and Yorke Natural Resources Management Board. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the General Manager, Northern and Yorke Natural Resources Management Board, PO Box 175 Crystal Brook SA 5523 or [email protected] Disclaimers The Northern and Yorke Natural Resources Management Board and the Government of South Australia, their employees and their servants do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use or results of use of the information contained herein as to its correctness, accuracy, currency or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Techniques in Bird Studies Course Report
    Field Techniques in Bird Studies Course Report Nov. 22nd – Nov 28th 2015- Lauren Gilson & Joe Porter Each year a small group of ornithologists meets at the Eyre Bird Observatory for a short course on techniques for studying birds. In 2015, course leader Tegan Douglas was presenting her own bird study results to ornithologists at the Australasian Ornithological Conference and Society for Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry conference, and so the course was led by Lauren Gilson. Bush fires almost blocked the southern migration of participants, but after determining that we would be safe from fire danger and smoke at Newman Rocks, Lauren and four of this year’s participants departed for our rendezvous with herpetologist/naturalist Joe Porter. At the Observatory, students William Oversby (supported by BirdLife WA), Angus McFarlane (supported by the Sowilo Community High School), Annika Baynham, and Hayden Ajduk were joined by former EBO caretakers/current course participants Danie and Delene van Dyk, and current EBO caretakers/former course participants, Alan and Wendy Pilkington. Wendy instructing Angus while Lauren records Surveying along Kanidal Beach Alan with Danie, Hayden & Annika The mist-netting session got everyone’s hands onto some birds, with New Holland Honeyeaters and Silvereyes volunteering in equal numbers to help train our flocks in extracting and processing captured birds. A single Blue-breasted Fairy-wren and White-browed Scrubwren provided a modicum of variety, with three Singing Honeyeaters and three Welcome Swallows completing the species list. Seven of 51 processed birds were recaptures, with most having been recently banded in the preceding months (the oldest from 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, Life-History, and Behavior in the Australian Scincid Genus Egernia, with Comments on the Evolution of Complex Sociality in Lizards
    Herpetological Monographs, 17, 2003, 145–180 Ó 2003 by The Herpetologists’ League, Inc. ECOLOGY, LIFE-HISTORY, AND BEHAVIOR IN THE AUSTRALIAN SCINCID GENUS EGERNIA, WITH COMMENTS ON THE EVOLUTION OF COMPLEX SOCIALITY IN LIZARDS 1 DAVID G. CHAPPLE School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia ABSTRACT: Squamate reptiles generally have been ignored in the search for a unified theory for the evolution of sociality due to the perception that they exhibit little social behavior beyond territoriality and dominance hierarchies and display polygynous mating systems. However a growing body of research has revealed unsuspected levels of social complexity and diversity in mating systems within the squamate lineage, particularly among the members of the Australian Scincid genus Egernia. Several species of Egernia are amongst the most highly social of all squamate reptiles, exhibiting stable social aggregations and high levels of long-term social and genetic monogamy. Social complexity is widespread within the Egernia genus, with reports of social aggregations in 23 of the 30 described species. The purpose of this review was to examine the potential for the Egernia genus as a model system for study of the evolution of sociality and monogamy within squamate reptiles. Current evidence indicates there is substantial variability in social complexity both within and between species, with social organization covering the spectrum from solitary to highly social. Four highly social Egernia species are known to live in stable social aggregations consisting of closely related individuals (adults, subadults, juveniles; i.e., ‘family’ groups) that appear to utilize chemical cues to recognize group members (kin recognition).
    [Show full text]
  • A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA
    A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA updates. for Edition 4th Editors See A.C. Robinson K.D. Casperson Biological Survey and Research Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia M.N. Hutchinson South Australian Museum Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, South Australia 2000 i EDITORS A.C. Robinson & K.D. Casperson, Biological Survey and Research, Biological Survey and Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage. G.P.O. Box 1047, Adelaide, SA, 5001 M.N. Hutchinson, Curator of Reptiles and Amphibians South Australian Museum, Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts. GPO Box 234, Adelaide, SA 5001updates. for CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Biological Survey & Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage Edition Department for Environment and Heritage 2000 4thISBN 0 7308 5890 1 First Edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second Edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Third Edition (edited bySee A.C. Robinson, M.N. Hutchinson, and K.D. Casperson) published 2000 Cover Photograph: Clockwise:- Western Pygmy Possum, Cercartetus concinnus (Photo A. Robinson), Smooth Knob-tailed Gecko, Nephrurus levis (Photo A. Robinson), Painted Frog, Neobatrachus pictus (Photo A. Robinson), Desert Goby, Chlamydogobius eremius (Photo N. Armstrong),Osprey, Pandion haliaetus (Photo A. Robinson) ii _______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Biodiversity Database Kangaroo Island
    DEVELOPMENT OF A BIODIVERSITY DATABASE FOR ASSESSING CONSERVATION VALUES KANGAROO ISLAND CASE STUDY By A.C.Robinson, P.K.Gullan, K.D.Casperson and S.J.Pillman Natural Resources Group DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT OF A BIODIVERSITY DATABASE FOR ASSESSING CONSERVATION VALUES KANGAROO ISLAND CASE STUDY by A.C.Robinson, P.K. Gullan*, K.D.Casperson and S.J.Pillman Biological Survey and Research Natural Resources Group Department of Environment and Natural Resources, South Australia *Director Viridans Pty Ltd 1995 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect those of theCommonwealth Government, the Minister for the Environment, Sport and Territories, or the Director of the Australian Nature Conservation Agency AUTHORS A. C. Robinson, K.D.Casperson and S.J.Pillman, Biological Survey and Research, Natural Resources Group, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, South Australia GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE 5001 P.K.Gullan, Viridans Pty Ltd, Suite 4 614 Hawthorn Road, Brighton East, Victoria 3187 CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Biological Survey and Research Group, Resource Management Branch ©Director, Australian Nature Conservation Agency 1995 Cover Design Compiled from the title screen graphics of the South Australian Biodiversity Database using COREL DRAW. The upper image is the underside of a leaf of the pale groundsel (Senecio hypoleucus) and the lower image is a tail feather of the Glossy Black Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami) HI Development of a Biodiversity Database Abstract In South Australia, databases which contain records of species of vascular plants and terrestrial vertebrate animals where the records are associated with an accurate geocode, are dispersed between a number of Government agencies including the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Department of Housing and Urban Development as well as the long term custodians of such data at the South Australian Museum and the State Herbarium.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 §4-71-6.5 List of Restricted Animals [ ] Part A: For
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF RESTRICTED ANIMALS [ ] PART A: FOR RESEARCH AND EXHIBITION SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Hirudinea ORDER Gnathobdellida FAMILY Hirudinidae Hirudo medicinalis leech, medicinal ORDER Rhynchobdellae FAMILY Glossiphoniidae Helobdella triserialis leech, small snail CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Haplotaxida FAMILY Euchytraeidae Enchytraeidae (all species in worm, white family) FAMILY Eudrilidae Helodrilus foetidus earthworm FAMILY Lumbricidae Lumbricus terrestris earthworm Allophora (all species in genus) earthworm CLASS Polychaeta ORDER Phyllodocida FAMILY Nereidae Nereis japonica lugworm PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Arachnida ORDER Acari FAMILY Phytoseiidae 1 RESTRICTED ANIMAL LIST (Part A) §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Iphiseius degenerans predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus longipes predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus macropilis predator, spider mite Neoseiulus californicus predator, spider mite Neoseiulus longispinosus predator, spider mite Typhlodromus occidentalis mite, western predatory FAMILY Tetranychidae Tetranychus lintearius biocontrol agent, gorse CLASS Crustacea ORDER Amphipoda FAMILY Hyalidae Parhyale hawaiensis amphipod, marine ORDER Anomura FAMILY Porcellanidae Petrolisthes cabrolloi crab, porcelain Petrolisthes cinctipes crab, porcelain Petrolisthes elongatus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes eriomerus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes gracilis crab, porcelain Petrolisthes granulosus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes japonicus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes laevigatus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Eyre Peninsula, South Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]