Eyre Peninsula, South Australia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eyre Peninsula, South Australia Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. The summary summarises the input data, so errors found in the original data would also be reflected in this summary. • The scientific names and taxonomic concepts used in this report reflect an ANHAT view of the data and not necessarily that found in government censuses, databases or other authoritative lists. Biodiversity summary for Eyre Peninsula SA Page 1 of 37 21-Jan-11 Reading the Biodiversity Summary The summary is divided into two sections: Highlightsand Species List. Highlights section This section draws attention to species of special interest, or characteristics of the biodiversity in the region which rate very highly compared to the rest of Australia. It contains the following: • Total number of nationally rare and threatened species found in the region and listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act. • A list of families which have a very high level of species richness or endemism compared to the rest of Australia. - Species richness counts the number of different species found in a given area. - Endemism estimates the degree to which species found in a given area have small geographic ranges. The smaller the range of a species, the more it contributes to the endemism score. In this summary, a threshold value of 2% was used. This means that compared to the rest of the country, the families listed in the summary may have a significant focus of diversity here, because all or part of the region has richness or endemism scores within the top 2% of areas in Australia. • A count of the number of species which have more than 50% of their recorded range within the region. If a species shows a value of 100% it indicates its distribution is restricted to that particular region as all the available records are in that region. Biodiversity summary for Eyre Peninsula SA Page 2 of 37 21-Jan-11 Species List section This section shows species which may be significant for biodiversity management in the region because: • they are listed in the EPBC Act as critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable, or conservation dependent; • their distribution lies entirely or primarily within the region. For each plant or animal family listed, this section also gives the total number of species in the country, and how many of them are found in the region. Note that this list covers species in the families listed in Appendix 1. Many species found in the region will not be listed because they don’t meet either of the two criteria above. The aim of providing a selected species list is to narrow the view from a very large number of species, to those which may be a focus of conservation activity in the region. Species which are largely restricted to the region may not have any conservation concerns, but may deserve attention because their future lies with the region and those who manage it. A list of all species in the region belonging to the families listed in Appendix 1 is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Biodiversity summary for Eyre Peninsula SA Page 3 of 37 21-Jan-11 Biodiversity Summary for NRM Region Eyre Peninsula, South Australia This summary was produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities using the Australian Natural Heritage Assessment Tool (ANHAT). ANHAT is a database and decision support tool which uses over 33 million specimen and survey records for vertebrates, selected invertebrates and 137 vascular plant families (over 15,000 species). This Biodiversity Summary does not include exotic or extinct species. Highlights Species Restricted to this Region The proportion of sampled range (%) as shown in the Species List is an indication of the distribution of the species in the region in relation to other parts of Australia. There are 97 species with greater than 50% of their recorded range in the region. Of these species, 29 species have 100% of their recorded range in the region. See the Species List for details. Threatened species (Enviroment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act) Total number of threatened species (Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act) in this region which belong to the families covered by this Biodiversity Summary (Appendix 1) 13 species declared as endangered 28 species declared as vulnerable Species Richness Compared to the rest of Australia parts of this region show a high level of richness for the following families. This means that the number of species in these families is in the top 2% compared to the rest of the country. Vertebrate fauna - Family Agamidae - Dragon lizards - Family Blenniidae - Blennies, Fangblennies, Rockshippers - Family Brachionichthyidae - Handfishes - Family Climacteridae - Treecreepers - Family Elopidae - Ladyfish - Family Enoplosidae - Oldwife - Family Gonorynchidae - Beaked Salmon, Beaked Sandfish, Ratfish - Family Labridae - Wrasses, Parrotfishes, Rockwhitings Biodiversity summary for Eyre Peninsula SA Page 4 of 37 21-Jan-11 - Family Monacanthidae - Leatherjackets - Family Mugilidae - Mullets - Family Pleuronectidae - Right Handed Flatfishes, Righteye Flounders - Family Pomatomidae - Bluefish, Tailor - Family Pygopodidae - Legless lizards - Family Sillaginidae - Sillagos, Whitings - Family Tetraodontidae - Blowfishes, Pufferfishes, Puffers, Toadfishes, Toby Invertebrate fauna - Family Amphibolidae - Supra-littoral Globose "Land" Snails - Family Asilidae - Robber Flies - Family Coreidae - - Family Ellobiidae - Primitive Supralittoral Pulmonate Snails - Family Halictidae - - Family Lycosidae - Wolf Spiders - Family Oxycarenidae - - Family Pentatomidae - Stinkbugs - Family Pleidae - Pygmy Backswimmers - Family Reduviidae - Assassin Bugs - Family Rhopalidae - - Family Scutelleridae - - Family Sparassidae - Huntsmen Spiders (formerly Heteropodidae) - Family Thaumastocoridae - Vascular flora - Family Aizoaceae - Pigfaces - Family Asphodelaceae - Native Leek - Family Asteraceae - Daisies and Allies - Family Chenopodiaceae - Saltbushes and Allies - Family Juncaginaceae - Water Ribbons - Family Orobanchaceae - - Family Ruppiaceae - - Family Zygophyllaceae - Zygophyllaceae Biodiversity summary for Eyre Peninsula SA Page 5 of 37 21-Jan-11 Endemism Compared to the rest of Australia parts of this region show a high level of endemism for the following families, placing them in the top 2% compared to the rest of the country. Vertebrate fauna - Family Acanthizidae - Scrubwrens, Thornbills and Allies - Family Agamidae - Dragon lizards - Family Blenniidae - Blennies, Fangblennies, Rockshippers - Family Brachionichthyidae - Handfishes - Family Carangidae - Amberjacks, Jacks, Pilotfishes, Pompanos, Queenfish - Family Climacteridae - Treecreepers - Family Elopidae - Ladyfish - Family Enoplosidae - Oldwife - Family Gonorynchidae - Beaked Salmon, Beaked Sandfish, Ratfish - Family Kyphosidae - Drummers, Halfmoons, Knifefishes, Microcanthids, Nib - Family Labridae - Wrasses, Parrotfishes, Rockwhitings - Family Maluridae - Fairy-wrens and Grasswrens - Family Monacanthidae - Leatherjackets - Family Mugilidae - Mullets - Family Pleuronectidae - Right Handed Flatfishes, Righteye Flounders - Family Pomatomidae - Bluefish, Tailor - Family Scincidae - Skinks - Family Sillaginidae - Sillagos, Whitings - Family Syngnathidae - Pipefishes, Seahorses - Family Terapontidae - Grunters - Family Tetraodontidae - Blowfishes, Pufferfishes, Puffers, Toadfishes, Toby Invertebrate fauna - Family Amphibolidae - Supra-littoral Globose "Land" Snails - Family Anthocoridae - - Family Aradidae - Flat bugs, Bark bugs - Family Asilidae - Robber Flies - Family Barychelidae - Brush-footed Trapdoor Spiders - Family Bulimulidae - Elongate High-spired
Recommended publications
  • Oochoristica Piankai Sp. N. (Cestoda: Linstowiidae) and Other Helminths of Moloch Horridus (Sauria: Agamidae) from Australia
    J. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 63(2), 1996, pp. 215-221 Oochoristica piankai sp. n. (Cestoda: Linstowiidae) and Other Helminths of Moloch horridus (Sauria: Agamidae) from Australia CHARLES R. BURSEY,' STEPHEN R. GOLDBERG,2 AND DAVID N. WooLERY2 'Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, Shenango Campus, Sharon, Pennsylvania 16146 (e- mail: [email protected]), and 2Department of Biology, Whittier College, Whittier, California 90608 (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT: Oochoristica piankai sp. n., a new linstowiid cestode, discovered in the small intestine of the thorny devil, Moloch horridus, is described and illustrated. Sixteen specimens of Oochoristica piankai sp. n. were found in 8 of 104 (8%) Moloch horridus from Australia. Oochoristica piankai sp. n. differs from 3 other Australian species of Oochoristica from lizards in the number of testes and the shape of the ovary. The presence of the nematode Parapharyngodon kartana and an encysted larva of Abbreviata sp. are also reported. Moloch horridus represents a new host record for P. kartana. KEY WORDS: Oochoristica piankai sp. n., cestode, Parapharyngodon kartana, Abbreviata sp., nematode, Mo- loch horridus, lizard, Agamidae, Australia. Only 3 of 74 species of Oochoristica Luhe, Northern Territory (snout-vent length = 86.1 mm ± 1898, a cosmopolitan genus of cestodes, have 14.5 SD). These specimens had been collected between been reported previously from reptiles of Aus- October 1966 and January 1968 for use in an ecological study (Pianka and Pianka, 1970); collection data will tralia. Taenia trachysauri MacCallum, 1921, was be found in that report. Because the ecological study described from specimens discovered in the in- included stomach analysis, only small and large intes- testine of the Australian lizard Trachydosaurus tines remained with most of the carcasses, but 3 intact rugosus Gray, in the New York Zoological Gar- stomachs and 5 pyloric stomach regions were present.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Edition 2020 - 3 in This Issue: Office Bearers for 2017
    1 Australian Plants Society Armidale & District Group PO Box 735 Armidale NSW 2350 web: www.austplants.com.au/Armidale e-mail: [email protected] Crowea exalata ssp magnifolia image by Maria Hitchcock Winter Edition 2020 - 3 In this issue: Office bearers for 2017 ......p1 Editorial …...p2Error! Bookmark not defined. New Website Arrangements .…..p3 Solstice Gathering ......p4 Passion, Boers & Hibiscus ......p5 Wollomombi Falls Lookout ......p7 Hard Yakka ......p8 Torrington & Gibraltar after fires ......p9 Small Eucalypts ......p12 Drought tolerance of plants ......p15 Armidale & District Group PO Box 735, Armidale NSW 2350 President: Vacant Vice President: Colin Wilson Secretary: Penelope Sinclair Ph. 6771 5639 [email protected] Treasurer: Phil Rose Ph. 6775 3767 [email protected] Membership: Phil Rose [email protected] 2 Markets in the Mall, Outings, OHS & Environmental Officer and Arboretum Coordinator: Patrick Laher Ph: 0427327719 [email protected] Newsletter Editor: John Nevin Ph: 6775218 [email protected],net.au Meet and Greet: Lee Horsley Ph: 0421381157 [email protected] Afternoon tea: Deidre Waters Ph: 67753754 [email protected] Web Master: Eric Sinclair Our website: http://www.austplants.com.au From the Editor: We have certainly had a memorable year - the worst drought in living memory followed by the most extensive bushfires seen in Australia, and to top it off, the biggest pandemic the world has seen in 100 years. The pandemic has made essential self distancing and quarantining to arrest the spread of the Corona virus. As a result, most APS activities have been shelved for the time being. Being in isolation at home has been a mixed blessing.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materialsupplementary Material
    10.1071/BT13149_AC © CSIRO 2013 Australian Journal of Botany 2013, 61(6), 436–445 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Comparative dating of Acacia: combining fossils and multiple phylogenies to infer ages of clades with poor fossil records Joseph T. MillerA,E, Daniel J. MurphyB, Simon Y. W. HoC, David J. CantrillB and David SeiglerD ACentre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600 Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BRoyal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Birdwood Avenue, South Yarra, Vic. 3141, Australia. CSchool of Biological Sciences, Edgeworth David Building, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. DDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. ECorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1 Materials used in the study Taxon Dataset Genbank Acacia abbreviata Maslin 2 3 JF420287 JF420065 JF420395 KC421289 KC796176 JF420499 Acacia adoxa Pedley 2 3 JF420044 AF523076 AF195716 AF195684; AF195703 Acacia ampliceps Maslin 1 KC421930 EU439994 EU811845 Acacia anceps DC. 2 3 JF420244 JF420350 JF419919 JF420130 JF420456 Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth 2 3 JF420259 JF420036 JF420366 JF419935 JF420146 KF048140 Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth. 1 2 3 JF420293 JF420402 KC421323 JQ248740 JF420505 Acacia baeuerlenii Maiden & R.T.Baker 2 3 JF420229 JQ248866 JF420336 JF419909 JF420115 JF420448 Acacia beckleri Tindale 2 3 JF420260 JF420037 JF420367 JF419936 JF420147 JF420473 Acacia cochlearis (Labill.) H.L.Wendl. 2 3 KC283897 KC200719 JQ943314 AF523156 KC284140 KC957934 Acacia cognata Domin 2 3 JF420246 JF420022 JF420352 JF419921 JF420132 JF420458 Acacia cultriformis A.Cunn. ex G.Don 2 3 JF420278 JF420056 JF420387 KC421263 KC796172 JF420494 Acacia cupularis Domin 2 3 JF420247 JF420023 JF420353 JF419922 JF420133 JF420459 Acacia dealbata Link 2 3 JF420269 JF420378 KC421251 KC955787 JF420485 Acacia dealbata Link 2 3 KC283375 KC200761 JQ942686 KC421315 KC284195 Acacia deanei (R.T.Baker) M.B.Welch, Coombs 2 3 JF420294 JF420403 KC421329 KC955795 & McGlynn JF420506 Acacia dempsteri F.Muell.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Tortilis Subsp Raddiana) Du Maroc : Approche Cytogénétique, Morpho-Métrique Et Moléculaire
    UNIVERSITE IBN ZOHR CENTRE DES ÉTUDES DOCTORALES IBN ZOHR Formation doctorale Science de la Vie et Ressources Naturelles Faculté des Sciences Agadir THÈSE Présentée par Fatima EL AYADI pour l’obtention de grade de DOCTEUR de l’Université Ibn Zohr Spécialité : Ressources Phytogénétiques Diversité des Ressources Génétiques des Acacia sahariens (Acacia tortilis subsp raddiana) du Maroc : Approche Cytogénétique, Morpho-métrique et Moléculaire Soutenu le 20 juin 2013 Devant la commission d’examen composée de : Prof. EL MODAFAR Cherkaoui F.S.T Marrakech Président Prof. HADDIOUI Abdelmajid F.S.T Béni Mellal Rapporteur Prof. BELMOUDEN Ahmed F.S. Agadir Rapporteur Prof. IBNSOUDA KORAICHI Saad F.S.T Fès Rapporteur Prof. MSANDA Fouad F.S. Agadir Co-directeur Prof. EL MOUSADIK Abdelhamid F.S. Agadir Directeur de Thèse Résumé La gestion et la préservation des formations steppiques à base d’Acacias sahariens (Acacia tortilis subsp raddiana) nécessitent au préalable une évaluation et une caractérisation de leur variabilité. Cette approche se base sur des études pluridisciplinaires faisant appel à l’analyse de la diversité des caractères adaptatifs (caractères agro-morphologiques) et neutres (marqueurs génétiques). Dans ce contexte, la présente étude vise à explorer à l’aide de marqueurs agro-morphométriques et moléculaires, la variabilité génétique des Acacias sahariens du Maroc. Cette étude a été menée en trois parties : i) Variabilité de la germination des graines collectées sur six provenances par l’utilisation de trois traitements (mécanique, chimique et thermique) avec un suivi de la cinétique de croissance au stade plantule. ii) Variabilité de neuf caractères morpho-métriques liés aux fruits (gousses) par une étude comparative au niveau des descendances (familles de demi-frères), des provenances (Agdz, N’Koub, Tazarine, Mcissi, Tata, Tissint, Foum Zguid, Guelmim, Msied et Assa) et des saisons (deux années d’étude).
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Sixth National Report
    Australia’s Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 2014 2018 ‒ 24 March 2020 © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence except content supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Inquiries about the licence and any use of this document should be emailed to [email protected]. Cataloguing data This report should be attributed as: Australia’s Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 2014‒2018, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2020 CC BY 4.0. ISBN 978-1-76003-255-5 This publication is available at http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/international/un-convention-biological-diversity. Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment GPO Box 858 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone 1800 900 090 Web awe.gov.au The Australian Government acting through the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment has exercised due care and skill in preparing and compiling the information and data in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, its employees and advisers disclaim all liability, including liability for negligence and for any loss, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying on any of the information or data in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law.
    [Show full text]
  • American River, Kangaroo Island
    TECHNICAL REPORTS & GUIDELINES TECHNICAL REPORTS & GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT REPORT Appendices A to I & K to L Issued September 2016 CONTENTS A. Infrastructure & Services Report (BCA Engineers) B. Native V egetation Assessment (Botanical Enigmerase) C. Landscape Concept Plan (Botanical Enigmerase) D. Fauna Assessment (Envisage Environmental) E. Archeological and Heritage Assessment (K. Walshe) N.B. This report is to be updated - it contains incorrect information regarding location of Plaque & Anchor F. Design Review 1 Letter (ODASA) G. Noise Assessment (Sonos) H. Stormwater Management (fmg Engineers) I. DR Guidelines (Development Assessment Commission) K. Draft CEMMP & OEMMP (PARTI) L. Traffic Impact Assessment ( infraPlan) - - - - - NATIVE VEGETATION CLEARANCE ASSESSMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN PROPOSED KANGAROO ISLAND RESORT AMERICAN RIVER CITY AND CENTRAL DEVELOPMENT (CCD) HOTEL AND RESORTS LLC 31 AUGUST 2016 BOTANICAL ENIGMERASE Michelle Haby- 0407 619 229 PO Box 639 Daniel Rowley- 0467 319 925 Kingscote SA 5223 ABN- 59 766 096 918 [email protected] NATIVE VEGETATION CLEARANCE ASSESSMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN 31 August 2016 Citation: Haby, M and Rowley, D.J. (2016) Native Vegetation Assessment and Landscape Plan- Proposed American River Resort. Internal report to City and Central Development (CCD) Hotel and Resorts LLC. This report was researched and prepared by Botanical Enigmerase Email: [email protected] in accordance with the agreement between, on behalf of and for the exclusive use of City and Central Development (CCD) Hotel and Resorts LLC 2800 156th Avenue SE Suite 130 Bellevue, WA 98007 [email protected] Michelle Haby is a Native Vegetation Council accredited consultant, accredited to prepare data reports for clearance consent under Section 28 of the Native Vegetation Act 1991 and applications made under one of the Native Vegetation Regulations 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    Myrmecological News 20 25-36 Online Earlier, for print 2014 The evolution and functional morphology of trap-jaw ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Fredrick J. LARABEE & Andrew V. SUAREZ Abstract We review the biology of trap-jaw ants whose highly specialized mandibles generate extreme speeds and forces for predation and defense. Trap-jaw ants are characterized by elongated, power-amplified mandibles and use a combination of latches and springs to generate some of the fastest animal movements ever recorded. Remarkably, trap jaws have evolved at least four times in three subfamilies of ants. In this review, we discuss what is currently known about the evolution, morphology, kinematics, and behavior of trap-jaw ants, with special attention to the similarities and key dif- ferences among the independent lineages. We also highlight gaps in our knowledge and provide suggestions for future research on this notable group of ants. Key words: Review, trap-jaw ants, functional morphology, biomechanics, Odontomachus, Anochetus, Myrmoteras, Dacetini. Myrmecol. News 20: 25-36 (online xxx 2014) ISSN 1994-4136 (print), ISSN 1997-3500 (online) Received 2 September 2013; revision received 17 December 2013; accepted 22 January 2014 Subject Editor: Herbert Zettel Fredrick J. Larabee (contact author), Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 320 Morrill Hall, 505 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, USA; Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Andrew V. Suarez, Department of Entomology and Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, Univer- sity of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 320 Morrill Hall, 505 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008 for the Yilgarn District Threatened Flora And
    1 YILGARN DISTRICT THREATENED FLORA AND COMMUNITIES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Annual Report 2008 For the Yilgarn District Threatened Flora and Communities Recovery Team Ben Lullfitz Conservation Officer (Flora) Daviesia microcarpa seedling (Photo: Hayden Cannon) Property and copyright of this document is vested jointly in the Director, Threatened Species and Communities Section, Environment Australia and the Executive Director, Western Australia Department of Environment and Conservation The Commonwealth disclaims responsibility for the views expressed Department of Environment and Conservation PO Box 332 Merredin WA 6415 Yilgarn District Threatened Flora and Communities Management Program 2008 Annual Report 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY OF KEY RECOVERY ACTIONS COMPLETED IN 2008 3 2. THREATENED FLORA AND COMMUNITIES RECOVERY TEAM 4 2.1. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 4 2.2. MEMBERS 4 2.3. RECOVERY TEAM MEETING 5 3. FUNDING 6 4. SPECIES AND COMMUNITIES BRANCH – INTERIM RECOVERY PLANS 6 4.1. IRPs OUTSTANDING 6 5. YILGARN DISTRICT THREATENED FLORA MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 6 5.1. YILGARN DISTRICT THREATENED FLORA SCHEDULE 6 6. IMPLIMENTATION OF RECOVERY ACTIONS 7 6.1. CRITICALLY ENDANGERED 7 6.2. ENDNGERED 8 6.3. VULNERABLE 8 6.4. PRIORITY ONE 9 6.5. PRIORITY TWO 9 6.6. PRIORITY THREE 9 6.7. PRIORITY FOUR 10 7. TRANSLOCATIONS 10 8. INDUCED RECRUITMENT BURNS 10 9. APPLICATIONS TO TAKE RARE FLORA 11 10. EDUCATION AND PUBLICITY 11 11. DISTRICT THREATENED FLORA HERBARIUM 11 12. PRIORITY ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES 11 13. CONCLUSION 12 APPENDIX 1: YILGARN DISTRICT THREATENED FLORA LIST 2008 13 Yilgarn District Threatened Flora and Communities Management Program 2008 Annual Report 3 1. SUMMARY OF KEY RECOVERY ACTIONS COMPLETED IN 2008 • Flora survey works in 2008 resulted in the discovery of 11 new populations of declared rare and priority flora in the Yilgarn district (2 endangered, 4 vulnerable and 5 priority species).
    [Show full text]
  • Research Matters Newsletter of the Australian Flora Foundation
    A charity fostering scientific research into the biology and cultivation of the Australian flora Research Matters Newsletter of the Australian Flora Foundation No. 31, January 2020 Inside 2. President’s Report 2019 3. AFF Grants Awarded 5. Young Scientist Awards 8. From Red Boxes to the World: The Digitisation Project of the National Herbarium of New South Wales – Shelley James and Andre Badiou 13. Hibbertia (Dilleniaceae) aka Guinea Flowers – Betsy Jackes 18. The Joy of Plants – Rosanne Quinnell 23. What Research Were We Funding 30 Years Ago? 27. Financial Report 28. About the Australian Flora Foundation President’s Report 2019 Delivered by Assoc. Prof. Charles Morris at the AGM, November 2019 A continuing development this year has been donations from Industry Partners who wish to support the work of the Foundation. Bell Art Australia started this trend with a donation in 2018, which they have continued in 2019. Source Separation is now the second Industry Partner sponsoring the Foundation, with a generous donation of $5,000. Other generous donors have been the Australian Plants Society (APS): APS Newcastle ($3,000), APS NSW ($3,000), APS Sutherland ($500) and SGAP Mackay ($467). And, of course, there are the amounts from our private donors. In August, the Council was saddened to hear of the death of Dr Malcolm Reed, President of the Foundation from 1991 to 1998. The Foundation owes a debt of gratitude to Malcolm; the current healthy financial position of the Foundation has its roots in a series of large donations and bequests that came to the Foundation during his tenure.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Wild Trees and Shrubs in the Egyptian Flora
    10 Egypt. J. Bot. Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 147-168 (2020) Egyptian Journal of Botany http://ejbo.journals.ekb.eg/ Characterization of the Wild Trees and Shrubs in the Egyptian Flora Heba Bedair#, Kamal Shaltout, Dalia Ahmed, Ahmed Sharaf El-Din, Ragab El- Fahhar Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, 31527, Tanta, Egypt. HE present study aims to study the floristic characteristics of the native trees and shrubs T(with height ≥50cm) in the Egyptian flora. The floristic characteristics include taxonomic diversity, life and sex forms, flowering activity, dispersal types,economic potential, threats and national and global floristic distributions. Nine field visits were conducted to many locations all over Egypt for collecting trees and shrubs. From each location, plant and seed specimens were collected from different habitats. In present study 228 taxa belonged to 126 genera and 45 families were recorded, including 2 endemics (Rosa arabica and Origanum syriacum subsp. sinaicum) and 5 near-endemics. They inhabit 14 habitats (8 natural and 6 anthropogenic). Phanerophytes (120 plants) are the most represented life form, followed by chamaephytes (100 plants). Bisexuals are the most represented. Sarcochores (74 taxa) are the most represented dispersal type, followed by ballochores (40 taxa). April (151 taxa) and March (149 taxa) have the maximum flowering plants. Small geographic range - narrow habitat - non abundant plants are the most represented rarity form (180 plants). Deserts are the most rich regions with trees and shrubs (127 taxa), while Sudano-Zambezian (107 taxa) and Saharo-Arabian (98 taxa) was the most. Medicinal plants (154 taxa) are the most represented good, while salinity tolerance (105 taxa) was the most represented service and over-collecting and over-cutting was the most represented threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park
    Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park Hiltaba Pastoral Lease and Gawler Ranges National Park, South Australia Survey conducted: 12 to 22 Nov 2012 Report submitted: 22 May 2013 P.J. Lang, J. Kellermann, G.H. Bell & H.B. Cross with contributions from C.J. Brodie, H.P. Vonow & M. Waycott SA Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes Bush Blitz – Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges NP, November 2012 Report submitted to Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study: 22 May 2013. Published online on http://data.environment.sa.gov.au/: 25 Nov. 2016. ISBN 978-1-922027-49-8 (pdf) © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resouces, South Australia, 2013. With the exception of the Piping Shrike emblem, images, and other material or devices protected by a trademark and subject to review by the Government of South Australia at all times, this report is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. All other rights are reserved. This report should be cited as: Lang, P.J.1, Kellermann, J.1, 2, Bell, G.H.1 & Cross, H.B.1, 2, 3 (2013). Flora survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park: vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes. Report for Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra. (Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, South Australia: Adelaide). Authors’ addresses: 1State Herbarium of South Australia, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR), GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
    [Show full text]