DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian and Soviet Tanks 1914-1941

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russian and Soviet Tanks 1914-1941 Russian and Soviet Tanks 1914-1941 English edition August 2013. ISBN: 978-1-291-74954-0 After the appearance of the tank in the First World War, the use of this new weapon was spread on a global scale. But in subsequent decades much interest in it, as the theories as to its use tactics, declined in most armies. Only a handful of visionaries raised their voices proclaiming the importance and possibilities that the use of these machines, integrated together in large formations, would have in the future. Very few nations would pay attention to those ideas and even less willing to invest their resources to implement them. Therefore, in the first half of the thirties come into regular service the first armored units equipped with medium and heavy tanks since the end of World War I, these events did not take place in one of the western industrialized countries, but in the Soviet Union. This is a chronicle of the formation of these units and the development of the first material that would nurture them, as well as later models that would mark a milestone in the history and would directly influence the course of this. As the explanatory note contained in this book, it must be recognized that in the virtual absence of specific names for the various versions of the vehicles described here, since this was a constant in this time period in the Soviet Union, many of the references to these versions have been taken considering their entry into service or manufacture year. Maximino Argüelles Martínez. Asturias, Spain in August 2013. Acknowledgments: To my muses: Dori and Nidia. And to all the inhabitants of "Little Russia" in the Hueria de Carrocera Valley. CONTENTS Genesis p. 2 The First Generation p. 16 The First Units p. 32 Dissolution and Reconstruction p. 38 Battle Horses p. 54 Factories and Testing Polygons p. 74 Situation at June 21, 1941 p. 78 Bibliography p. 97 The Baltic Russian firm was founded in the city of Riga in 1908. Becoming the industrial and technological forefront of the Russian Empire. And one of the leading European car manufacturers of the time. Compared with other European manufacturers by 1914 the firm had produced 300 cars, Alfa Romeo 200, Audi 210, Bugatti 150 and Mercedes around 100. The models of the C24 Torpedo Type C series took a clean sweep the first positions in sporting automobile competitions pioneers in Europe. In 1912 the journalist André Nagel at the controls of a Torpedo Type C gets the victory in the Rally St. Petersburg Monaco and that year is among the top positions in the Saint Petersburg Saint Sebastian race. In this illustration appears an Austin first series armored vehicle, in service with an armored detachment of the 4th Russian Army operating in Romania during 1916. Genesis Technical studies on armored vehicles capable of independent movement of railways in Russia was initiated in the first decade of the twentieth century. After the defeat of 1905 in the war against Japan, is launching a program to modernize its armed forces. The result of these plans is responsible construction in France of which would be the first Russian armored vehicles. It would be eight armored cars designed by the Georgian engineer N. K. Nakashidze, model Nakashidze-Charron, known in the West as CGV Charron. Delivered in 1908, weighing 3 tons and 3 crew on a future disposition announcing the conventional composition of these vehicles: protected structure on a four-wheeled chassis and armed with a 8mm machine gun in a rotating turret on top on the structure. In dealing with the beginnings of the automobile in these latitudes is necessary to highlight the Baltic Russian firm (Russo Balt), founded in 1908 in the city of Riga, the main industrial center of the Russian Empire. As early as 1910 it began testing in the Russian army all-terrain vehicles manufactured by this firm. In the same bill is the 1913 draft one of the world's first half-tracks, with the assistance of the French firm Kegresse, it is the Russo-Balt D24/40 Kegresse high mobility vehicle used primarily as an ambulance. Different products of this factory supplied Russian army trucks as 1912 Type D and 1913 Type M and T. FIRST PROJECTS Russo-Balt armored vehicle This is the first armored vehicle manufactured in Russia shortly before the start of the first world war in 1914 over the chassis of a Type C car of this firm, installing on a protected structure with angular shapes, without rotating turrets, the various machine guns which is armed stand at the sides, front and rear in some cases, run by its five crew members. 2 Gardford-Putilov armored vehicle The design work Gardford-Putilov Putilov workshops began in St. Petersburg in 1914, production reached 48 copies in two versions, one for the Army and one for the Navy. About the Gardford truck chassis 4 tons imported was mounted armored structure capable of accommodating a crew of 8-9 men and an armament of several machine guns and field artillery piece of 76.2 mm at the rear located on a tower with rotation capacity. naval version, designed for the defense of the main naval bases in the Baltic Sea, was equipped with more armor which raised the weight to 11 tons compared to 9 of the terrestrial version. Powered by an engine of only 30 horse power did not exceed 18 to 16 Km / h and its mobility off-road or was practically nil. Despite these limitations, the armament became a vehicle with more firepower of their time and an efficient anti tank mobile weapon. FIRST TANK PROJECTS Mendeleev armored train Recognized as one of the first chariot projects created between 1911 and 1915 by Vasiliy Mendeleev Russian engineer, was never built. 3 The huge vehicle designed, with about 12 m long and weighing 100 tons, would have a suspension system consisting of gas cylinders that would allow him to lay his helmet on the ground to protect the tracks and undercarriage. It would be powered by a 250 hp naval and same origin would be their armor plates and weapons. The concept itself, it would be more of a self-propelled artillery piece or mobile fortress, which a tank itself. There are some sources mention another armored vehicle project developed in Rybinsk tractor factory, known as Rybinsk Factory Tank, presented to the technical department of the Russian Army in 1916, weighing 20 tons shaped structure rectangular box mounted on a tracked chassis and armed with a 107mm piece at one end and a high-mounted machine guns at the other end, very similar in concept and size to French St Chammon medium tank. Vezdekhod Literally translated from Russian "Whoever can go anywhere." Developed by a young aeronautical engineer Aleksandr Porokhovschikov, it was to produce a prototype in the spring of 1915 and after being subjected to numerous tests during the rest of the year, finally in December 1915 did not continue with the project despite considering the technical department Russian Army could be a practical idea and of some use. It was a small car under four meters long, equipped with a very wide single track in the middle and two small wheels to facilitate movement by road. The prototype had no weapons, but was expected equipped with a turret armed with a machine gun operated by the sole occupant. The hull design diamond shape resembled that of the first British designs, with a forward lean and very low center of gravity which facilitated overcoming the various obstacles on the ground. Currently there is still controversy as to whether this is the first battle tank built in the world, what is clear is that it is the first built in Russia. 4 Tzar Tank In August 1915 a field test on the outskirts of Moscow maneuvered one of the strangest military vehicles and curious how many have been produced to date. It was the Tzar battle tank, also known by the name of its principal designer Nikolai Lebedenko or Netopýr even bat (this name came from the resemblance to a bat sleeping hanging when carrying the scale model of the vehicle seized by rear wheel). A 40-ton mill powered by two large wheels of 9 m in diameter at the front each driven by a 250 hp engine in the rear a roller with three wheels 1.5 meters in diameter served him support, a provision very unusual tricycle in armored vehicle design. The armament consisted of numerous machine guns and cannons on a tower at the top of the helmet to 8 meters high, in side barbettes and also provided other armed tower in the bottom of the hull. After several unsuccessful attempts on the ground the project was canceled mainly due to poor off-road mobility, being vulnerable to artillery fire because of its height and its huge cost, 250,000 rubles of the time. The prototype was abandoned in the field of tests and was finally dismantled in 1923. No doubt that this, together with the draft Mendeleev, is one of the most outstanding examples of the speculation on the land battleships theory that spread through much of Europe in the first half of this decade. This was in addition to project on land war scenario concepts and mobilities own naval resources, protection and great firepower. But these proved totally outdated concepts for the technical possibilities of the time. 5 ARMORED VEHICLES IN ACTION After the start of the First World War and the first deliveries of armored vehicles is created in the fall of 1914 the first organic company of Russian Automobile Corps composed of 15 Russian-Balt armored cars armed with machine guns and 3 Gardford-Putilov armored trucks equipped 76.2 mm cannon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • M6 Heavy Tank the Newly-Formed Heavy Tank Platoons Are Lieutenant Giving a Good Account of Themselves
    HEAVY TANK PLATOON Lieutenant M6 HEAVY TANK The newly-formed heavy tank platoons are Lieutenant giving a good account of themselves. DEVELOPMENT Heavy Tank Platoons are rated as: Confident Trained At the outbreak of World War II the US Army DESIGN FEATURES possessed few tanks, and no heavy tanks. In OON May 1940 the US Army Ordnance Department When the specifications were laid down PLatooN T for the M6 heavy tank it was normal for Command M6 heavy tank started to work on the T1, 50-ton heavy LA heavy tanks, such as the Soviet T-35, HQ Tank multi-turreted tank. This was similar in 3 M6 heavy tanks ...... 510 points P concept to the Soviet T-35 and other 1930s to follow the ‘land battleship’ model, ‘land battleship’ designs. By October 1940, having multiple turrets mounting a 2 M6 heavy tanks ...... 340 points Sergeant CorporalSergeant the Department reached the same conclusions variety of guns and machine-guns. The 1 M6 heavy tank ....... 170 points of excessive size, difficulty in crew co- T1 heavy tank specification featured a ordination and high production cost that had slightly more modern arrangement with led to the abandonment of the land battleship both of its guns mounted in the same REPLACING StANDARD EQUIPMENT concept in Europe. turret and its twin .50 cal machine- Any US company may replace a Tank Platoon guns in a relatively conventional bow M6 heavy tank M6 heavy tank A new T1 heavy tank design was laid down with mounting. taken as a Support platoon with a Heavy a single turret retaining the mixed armament Tank Platoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Projected Acquisition Costs for the Army's Ground Combat Vehicles
    Projected Acquisition Costs for the Army’s Ground Combat Vehicles © MDart10/Shutterstock.com APRIL | 2021 At a Glance The Army operates a fleet of ground combat vehicles—vehicles intended to conduct combat opera- tions against enemy forces—and plans to continue to do so. Expanding on the Army’s stated plans, the Congressional Budget Office has projected the cost of acquiring such vehicles through 2050. Those projections include costs for research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) and for procurement but not the costs of operating and maintaining the vehicles. CBO’s key findings are as follows: • Total acquisition costs for the Army’s ground combat vehicles are projected to average about $5 billion per year (in 2020 dollars) through 2050—$4.5 billion for procurement and $0.5 billion for RDT&E. • The projected procurement costs are greater (in constant dollars) than the average annual cost for such vehicles from 2010 to 2019 but approximately equal to the average annual cost from 2000 to 2019 (when spending was boosted because of operations in Iraq). • More than 40 percent of the projected acquisition costs of Army ground combat vehicles are for Abrams tanks. • Most of the projected acquisition costs are for remanufactured and upgraded versions of current vehicles, though the Army also plans to acquire an Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle, which will replace the Bradley armored personnel carrier; an Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle, which will replace the M113 armored personnel carrier; and a new Mobile Protected Firepower tank, which will be lighter than an Abrams tank. • The Army is also considering developing an unmanned Decisive Lethality Platform that might eventually replace Abrams tanks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of British Tactical and Operational Tank Doctrine and Training in the First World War
    The evolution of British tactical and operational tank doctrine and training in the First World War PHILIP RICHARD VENTHAM TD BA (Hons.) MA. Thesis submitted for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy by the University of Wolverhampton October 2016 ©Copyright P R Ventham 1 ABSTRACT Tanks were first used in action in September 1916. There had been no previous combat experience on which to base tactical and operational doctrine for the employment of this novel weapon of war. Training of crews and commanders was hampered by lack of vehicles and weapons. Time was short in which to train novice crews. Training facilities were limited. Despite mechanical limitations of the early machines and their vulnerability to adverse ground conditions, the tanks achieved moderate success in their initial actions. Advocates of the tanks, such as Fuller and Elles, worked hard to convince the sceptical of the value of the tank. Two years later, tanks had gained the support of most senior commanders. Doctrine, based on practical combat experience, had evolved both within the Tank Corps and at GHQ and higher command. Despite dramatic improvements in the design, functionality and reliability of the later marks of heavy and medium tanks, they still remained slow and vulnerable to ground conditions and enemy counter-measures. Competing demands for materiel meant there were never enough tanks to replace casualties and meet the demands of formation commanders. This thesis will argue that the somewhat patchy performance of the armoured vehicles in the final months of the war was less a product of poor doctrinal guidance and inadequate training than of an insufficiency of tanks and the difficulties of providing enough tanks in the right locations at the right time to meet the requirements of the manoeuvre battles of the ‘Hundred Days’.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanks and Tank Warfare | International Encyclopedia of The
    Version 1.0 | Last updated 17 May 2016 Tanks and Tank Warfare By Michael David Kennedy World War I introduced new technologies and doctrine in a quest to overcome the tactical stalemate of the trenches. The first tanks had great potential that would be capitalized upon during the next world war, but early models suffered from design flaws and lack of doctrine for their use on the battlefield. Table of Contents 1 Definition and Background 2 Characteristics 3 Development in Great Britain 4 Battle of the Somme (1 July-18 November 1916) 5 Battle of Cambrai (20-30 November 1917) 6 French Tanks 7 German Tanks 8 Tanks in the American Expeditionary Forces 9 Impact of Tanks on World War I Selected Bibliography Citation Definition and Background Tanks are armored vehicles designed to combine the military factors of fire, maneuver and protection. Although the concept of armored vehicles preceded the Great War, the tank was specifically developed to overcome the stalemate of trench warfare on the Western Front that followed the First Battle of Ypres (19 October-22 November 1914). The marrying of recent technological advances, such as the internal combustion engine with armor plating, enabled the tank’s development during World War I. Characteristics The first tanks introduced in 1916 were generally slow and hard to maneuver, and they performed poorly in rugged terrain. The early models were heavily influenced by commercial tractors. While impervious to barbed wire, small arms, and shrapnel, their primitive armor was still susceptible to heavy machine gun fire and direct hits from high explosive artillery rounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (Cfe)
    CFE TEXT TREATY ON CONVENTIONAL ARMED FORCES IN EUROPE (CFE) Signed: 19 November 1990. inconsistent with the purposes and principles of the Entered into Force*: 9 November 1992. Charter of the United Nations, Duration: Unlimited. Depository: The Netherlands. CONSCIOUS of the need to prevent any military conflict in Europe, Number of States Parties: 30 — Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Re-public, Denmark, France, Georgia, CONSCIOUS of the common responsibility which Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, they all have for seeking to achieve greater stability Kazakhstan, Luxembourg, Moldova, the Netherlands, and security in Europe, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation*, Slovakia, Spain, Tur-key, Ukraine, Striving to replace military confrontation with a new United Kingdom, and United States. pattern of security relations among all the States Parties based on peaceful cooperation and thereby to *On 14 July 2007, Russia announced that it would contribute to overcoming the division of Europe, suspend implementation of its Treaty obligations, effective after 150 days COMMITTED to the objectives of establishing a secure and stable balance of conventional armed The Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, forces in Europe at lower levels than heretofore, of Canada, the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, the eliminating disparities prejudicial to stability and Kingdom of Denmark, the French Republic, the security and of eliminating, as a matter of high Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic
    [Show full text]
  • The M1A2 Abrams: the Last Main Battle Tank?
    The M1A2 Abrams: The Last Main Battle Tank? by Stanley C. Crist With its superb integration of fire- Although Longbow Hellfire was de- is expected to enter production around power, mobility, and armor protection, signed for the AH-64D Apache heli- 2015, replacing the M1-series tanks. the M1A2 Abrams is very nearly the copter, there is no obvious reason it Since the next generation armored ultimate incarnation of the main battle couldn’t be fired from an armored ve- fighting vehicle is no longer referred to tank (MBT). Although more advanced hicle. Indeed, at least one nation is ap- as an MBT, can it be inferred that the design concepts have been published in parently developing a similar system. future combat system need not be a recent years, it will likely prove quite According to the August/December tank as we know it today? difficult to produce an MBT suffi- 1993 issue of ASIAN MILITARY RE- If self-guided missiles are chosen for ciently superior (to the M1A2) to jus- VIEW, India has developed the NAG, a tify the cost, so why not look for a bet- fire-and-forget antitank missile with a the primary armament of the FCS, a ter idea? range of six kilometers. It was planned number of advantages present them- that the NAG would be the armament selves. For one, it ought to be possible to eliminate the turret assembly; this The Missile Option for a tracked combat vehicle. With would greatly simplify construction, ground surveillance radar (GSR) incor- When Egyptian Saggers surprised Is- porated into its fire control system, with a corresponding decrease in pro- duction cost and vehicle weight.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master's Thesis the M26 Pershing
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master’s Thesis The M26 Pershing: America’s Forgotten Tank - Developmental and Combat History Author : Reader : Supervisor : Robert P. Hanger Dr. Christopher J. Smith Dr. David L. Snead A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Arts In the Liberty University Department of History May 11, 2018 Abstract The M26 tank, nicknamed the “General Pershing,” was the final result of the Ordnance Department’s revolutionary T20 series. It was the only American heavy tank to be fielded during the Second World War. Less is known about this tank, mainly because it entered the war too late and in too few numbers to impact events. However, it proved a sufficient design – capable of going toe-to-toe with vaunted German armor. After the war, American tank development slowed and was reduced mostly to modernization of the M26 and component development. The Korean War created a sudden need for armor and provided the impetus for further development. M26s were rushed to the conflict and demonstrated to be decisive against North Korean armor. Nonetheless, the principle role the tank fulfilled was infantry support. In 1951, the M26 was replaced by its improved derivative, the M46. Its final legacy was that of being the foundation of America’s Cold War tank fleet. Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter 1. Development of the T26 …………………………………………………..………..10 Chapter 2. The M26 in Action in World War II …………...…………………………………40 Chapter 3. The Interwar Period ……………………………………………………………….63 Chapter 4. The M26 in Korea ………………………………………………………………….76 The Invasion………………………………………………………...………77 Intervention…………………………………………………………………81 The M26 Enters the War……………………………………………………85 The M26 in the Anti-Tank Role…………………………………………….87 Chapter 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Rifle Divisions on 22Nd June 1941 There Were 15 Rifle Divisions in the Leningrad Military District
    The Actual Strength of all Soviet Land Combat Units in a Deployed (D) State on 22nd June 1941 Part IV 6 The Leningrad Military District (Northern Front from 24th June 1941) In this section we will focus on the actual manpower and equipment strength of the land combat units deployed in the Leningrad Military District on 22nd June 1941. We will examine the strength of the individual combat units and reconcile this with the actual strength in the whole of the military district. Rifle Divisions On 22nd June 1941 there were 15 rifle divisions in the Leningrad Military District. On 1st June 1941 the average personnel strength in these divisions was 11 985 men, or 83% of the wartime authorised TOE.1 In terms of personnel this made the rifle divisions in this district the strongest of any in the Western Military Districts when the Germans attacked. Three of the 15 rifle divisions (the 237th, 177th and 191st) were new and in the process of forming. The average strength of the 12 older established divisions was over 13 100 men, which made them close to full strength. Perhaps the Soviets maintained these divisions at higher than average strength due to the recent hostilities with Finland. Table Len MD Divs 1 shows the actual strength of the rifle divisions in the Leningrad Military District on 22nd June 1941. Most of the rifle divisions were well established divisions with six formed before 1939, five formed in 1939, one in 1940 and three in 1941. The average rifle division in the Leningrad Military District on 22nd June 1941 had an inventory containing: up to or over 100% of their authorised MGs and mortars, around 93% of their authorised AT guns, 73-89% of their authorised light artillery and infantry guns (76mm), 78-102% of their authorised medium to heavy artillery, and all their authorised heavy AA guns.
    [Show full text]
  • Nestor Makhno in the Russian Civil War.Pdf
    NESTOR MAKHNO IN THE RUSSIAN CIVIL WAR Michael Malet THE LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE TeutonicScan €> Michael Malet \982 AU rights reserved. No parI of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, wilhom permission Fim ed/lIOn 1982 Reprinted /985 To my children Published by lain, Saffron, and Jonquil THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD London rind BasingSloke Compafl/u rind reprutntatiW!S throughout the warld ISBN 0-333-2S969-6 Pnnted /II Great Bmain Antony Rowe Ltd, Ch/ppenham 5;landort � Signalur RNB 10043 Akz.·N. \d.·N. I, "'i • '. • I I • Contents ... Acknowledgements VIII Preface ox • Chronology XI .. Introduction XVII Glossary xx' PART 1 MILITARY HISTORY 1917-21 1 Relative Peace, 1917-18 3 2 The Rise of the Balko, July 19I5-February 1919 13 3 The Year 1919 29 4 Stalemate, January-October 1920 54 5 The End, October I92O-August 1921 64 PART 2 MAKHNOVSCHYNA-ORGAN1SATION 6 Makhno's Military Organisation and Capabilities 83 7 Civilian Organisation 107 PART 3 IDEOLOGY 8 Peasants and Workers 117 9 Makhno and the Bolsheviks 126 10 Other Enemies and Rivals 138 11 Anarchism and the Anarchists 157 12 Anti-Semitism 168 13 Some Ideological Questions 175 PART 4 EXILE J 4 The Bitter End 183 References 193 Bibliography 198 Index 213 • • '" Acknowledgements Preface My first thanks are due to three university lecturers who have helped Until the appearance of Michael PaJii's book in 1976, the role of and encouraged me over the years: John Erickson and Z. A. B. Nestor Makhno in the events of the Russian civil war was almost Zeman inspired my initial interest in Russian and Soviet history, unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazilian Tanks British Tanks Canadian Tanks Chinese Tanks
    Tanks TANKS Brazilian Tanks British Tanks Canadian Tanks Chinese Tanks Croatian Tanks Czech Tanks Egyptian Tanks French Tanks German Tanks Indian Tanks Iranian Tanks Iraqi Tanks Israeli Tanks Italian Tanks Japanese Tanks Jordanian Tanks North Korean Tanks Pakistani Tanks Polish Tanks Romanian Tanks Russian Tanks Slovakian Tanks South African Tanks South Korean Tanks Spanish Tanks Swedish Tanks Swiss Tanks Ukrainian Tanks US Tanks file:///E/My%20Webs/tanks/tanks_2.html[3/22/2020 3:58:21 PM] Tanks Yugoslavian Tanks file:///E/My%20Webs/tanks/tanks_2.html[3/22/2020 3:58:21 PM] Brazilian Tanks EE-T1 Osorio Notes: In 1982, Engesa began the development of the EE-T1 main battle tank, and by 1985, it was ready for the world marketplace. The Engesa EE-T1 Osorio was a surprising development for Brazil – a tank that, while not in the class of the latest tanks of the time, one that was far above the league of the typical third-world offerings. In design, it was similar to many tanks of the time; this was not surprising, since Engesa had a lot of help from West German, British and French armor experts. The EE-T1 was very promising – an excellent design that several countries were very interested in. The Saudis in particular went as far as to place a pre- order of 318 for the Osorio. That deal, however, was essentially killed when the Saudis saw the incredible performance of the M-1 Abrams and the British Challenger, and they literally cancelled the Osorio order at the last moment. This resulted in the cancellation of demonstrations to other countries, the demise of Engesa, and with it a promising medium tank.
    [Show full text]
  • GURPS WWII Classic
    World War II raged from the deserts of North Africa to the jungles of the South Pacific, from the mountaintops of the Alps to the beaches of Normandy, across (and under) the high seas, and through the skies above it all. Soldiers in all of these places relied upon the machines of war: bombers, fighters, tanks, jeeps, ships, submarines, landing craft, and much more. GURPS WWII: Motor Pool has a huge variety of historically accurate vehicles from mankind’s greatest conflict. Many of the vehicles were common; others were rare or even unique. From the stodgy General Lee tank to the earliest helicopters and the wildly impractical Maus, Motor Pool has tons of new gear for every GURPS WWII player. Motor Pool also gathers in one place all the refinements to the vehicle design system that have evolved since the original corebook came out, as well as a new system to describe any WWII-era conveyance in a few simple steps. These additions include scores of new weapons to be fitted on your war machines – some historical and some products of the imagination. On top of all that, Motor Pool has advice on S how to integrate vehicles into a roleplaying T E campaign, with details on how vehicle crews V really lived and fought, from the difficulties of E supply to getting their machine moving at all. J A Whether you’re campaigning by land, by sea, or C by air, Motor Pool dramatically expands your K options! S O N . AGAINST HEAVY METAL! FIRST EDITION,FIRST PRINTING G A PUBLISHED APRIL 2004 M ISBN 1-55634-642-5 E 9!BMF@JA:RSUSQQoYjZ]ZiZdZ` S 8 0 1 Printed in 1 SJG02495 8011 the USA World War II raged from the deserts of North Africa to the jungles of the South Pacific, from the mountaintops of the Alps to the beaches of Normandy, across (and under) the high seas, and through the skies above it all.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Army, 4 June 1916
    Russian Army 4 June 1916 Northwest Front: Finland Garrison: XLII Corps: 106th Infantry Division 421st Tsarskoe Selo Infantry Regiment 422nd Kolpino Infantry Regiment 423rd Luga Infantry Regiment 424th Chut Infantry Regiment 107th Infantry Division 425th Kargopol Infantry Regiment 426th Posinets Infantry Regiment 427th Pudozh Infantry Regiment 428th Lodeyinpol Infantry Regiment Sveaborg Border Brigade 1st Sveaborg Border Regiment 2nd Sveaborg Border Regiment Estonia Coast Defense: 108th Infantry Division 429th Riizhsk Infantry Regiment 430th Balksy Infantry Regiment 431st Tikhvin Infantry Regiment 432nd Baldaia Infantry Regiment Revel Border Brigade 1st Revel Border Regiments 2nd Revel Border Regiments Livonia Coast Defense: I Corps 22nd Novgorod Infantry Division 85th Vyborg Infantry Regiment 86th Wilmanstrand Infantry Regiment 87th Neschlot Infantry Regiment 88th Petrov Infantry Regiment 24th Pskov Infantry Division 93rd Irkhtsk Infantry Regiment 94th Yenisei Infantry Regiment 95th Krasnoyarsk Infantry Regiment 96th Omsk Infantry Regiment III Corps 73rd Orel Infantry Division 289th Korotoyav Infantry Regiment 290th Valuiisk Infantry Regiment 291st Trubchev Infantry Regiment 292nd New Archangel Infantry Regiment 5th Rifle Division (Suwalki) 17th Rifle Regiment 18th Rifle Regiment 19th Rifle Regiment 20th Rifle Regiment V Siberian Corps 1 50th St. Petersburg Infantry Division 197th Lesnot Infantry Regiment 198th Alexander Nevsky Infantry Regiment 199th Kronstadt Infantry Regiment 200th Kronshlot Infantry Regiment 6th (Khabarovsk) Siberian
    [Show full text]