DOCSLIB.ORG

References Cited in Dakota Skipper and Poweshiek Skipperling Proposed Listing Rule

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
References Cited in Dakota Skipper and Poweshiek Skipperling Proposed Listing Rule References Cited in Dakota skipper and Poweshiek skipperling proposed listing rule Bahm, M. A., T. G. Barnes, and K. C. Jensen. 2011. Restoring Native Plant Communities in Smooth Brome (Bromus inermis)– Dominated Grasslands. Invasive Plant Science and Management 4:239-250. Belcher, J. W. and S. D. Wilson. 1989. Leafy Spurge and the Species Composition of a Mixed- Grass Prairie. Journal of Range Management 42:172-175. Bess, J. A. 1988. An insect survey of eight fens in southern Michigan., Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing, MI. Beyers, B. 2012. Killer in a Bottle? Household insecticides may play a role in declining bee populations. University of Minnesota. Blatchley, W. S. 1891. A catalogue of the butterflies known to occur in Indiana. Annual Report of the Indiana State Geologist 17:365-408. Boettcher, J. F., T. B. Bragg, and D. M. Sutherland. 1993. Floristic Diversity in Ten Tallgrass Prairie Remnants of Eastern Nebraska. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/116 XX:33-40. Borkin, S. S. 1995. 1994 Ecological Studies of the Poweshiek Skipper (Oarisma poweshiek) in Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI. Borkin, S. S. 2000. Proposal for outplanting on a state natural area., Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI. Borkin, S. S. 1995. 1994 Ecological Studies of the Poweshiek Skipper (Oarisma poweshiek) in Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI. Borkin, S. 1996. Ecological studies of the Poweshiek skipper (Oarisma poweshiek) in Wisconsin -1995 Season Summary. Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI. Bragg, T. B. 1995. The physical environment of Great Plains grasslands. Pages 11-37 in K. A. a. A. J. Keelerad, editor. The changing prairie: North American grasslands. Oxford University Press, New York. Bragg, T. B. 1995. The physical environment of great plains grasslands. Page 244 in A. Joern, editor. The Changing Prairie: North American Grasslands. Oxford University Press, New York. Braker, N. 1985. Felton Prairie. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program, St. Paul, MN. Britten, H. B. and J. W. Glasford. 2002. Genetic population structure of the Dakota skipper (Lepidoptera: Hesperia dacotae): A North American native prairie obligate. Conservation Genetics [Conserv. Genet.]. 3:363-374. Brock, J. P. and K. Kaufman. 2003. Butterflies of North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, NY. Burke, R., J. Fitzsimmons, and J. Kerr. 2011. A mobility index for Canadian butterfly species based on naturalists’ knowledge. Biodiversity and Conservation 20:2273-2295. Carnes, C. 2011. Biological Opinion - Gyspy moth suppression program. U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Green Bay, WI. Catling, P. M. and J. D. Lafontaine. 1986. First documented record of Oarisma poweshiek (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in Canada. The Great Lakes Entomologist 19:63-66. Cochrane, J. F. and P. Delphey. 2002. Status assessment and conservation guidelines: Dakota skipper [Hesperia dacotae (Skinner)], (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae): Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, MN. Congressional Research Service (CRS). 2007. Land Conversion in the Northern Plains. Washington, DC. 13 p. COSEWIC. 2003. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Poweshiek skipperling Oarisma poweshiek in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa. Culliney, T. W. 2005. Benefits of Classical Biological Control for Managing Invasive Plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 24:131-150. Damhoureyeh, S. A. and D. C. Hartnett. 1997. Effects of bison and cattle on growth, reproduction, and abundances of five tallgrass prairie forbs. American Journal of Botany 84:1719-1728. Dana, R. 1983. The Dakota skipper: A now rare prairie butterfly. Natural Areas Journal 3:31-34. Dana, R. 1997. Characterization of three Dakota skipper sites in Minnesota., Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, St. Paul, MN. Dana, R. 2008. Southwest Minnesota prairie Lepidoptera study, 2007 - Draft., Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Minnesota County Biological Survey, St. Paul, MN. Dana, R. P. 1991. Conservation management of the prairie skippers Hesperia dacotae and Hesperia ottoe. Station Bulletin 594-1991 (AD-SB-5511-S), Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota. Dodge, G. M. 1872. A new Hesperian.. Canadian Entomologist 4:217-218. Doherty, K. E., A. J. Ryba, C. I. Stemler, N. D. Niemuth, and W. A. Meeks. 2013. Conservation planning in an era of change: State of the U. S. Prairie Pothole Region. Wildlife Society Bulletin:1 - 18. Environment Canada. 2012. Recovery Strategy for the Poweshiek Skipperling (Oarisma poweshiek) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series., Ottawa. Fiedler, A. K. and D. A. Landis. 2012. Biotic and abiotic conditions in Michigan prairie fen Invaded by glossy buckthorn (Frangula alnus). Natural Areas Journal 32:41-53. Forest Service. 2011. http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5130553.pdf Forest Service. 2011. Region 1: Sensitive species list Pages 1-5 in U. U.S. Forest Service, editor. Ganguly, A.r., K. Steinhaeuser, D. Erickson III, M. Branstetter, E. Parish, N. Singh, J. Drake, and L. Buja. 2009. Higher trends but larger uncertainty and geographic variability in 21st century temperature and heat waves. Preceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:15555-15559. Galatowitsch, S., L. Frelich, and L. Phillips-Mao. 2009. Regional climate change adaptation strategies for biodiversity conservation in a mid-continental region of North America. Biological Conservation 142:2012-2022. Glassberg, J. 1999. Butterflies through Binoculars: The East. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Gross, K., E. J. Kalendra, B. R. Hudgens, and N. M. Haddad. 2007. Robustness and uncertainty in estimates of butterfly abundance from transect counts. Population Ecology 49:191– 200. Hamel, C., J. Becker, R. Westwood, and L. Reeves. 2013. Surveys for Poweshiek Skipperling, Oarisma poweshiek, in the region of the Tall Grass Prairie Preserve in south eastern Manitoba Report on 2012 field activities - DRAFT. Nature Conservancy of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba. Hanski, I., A. Moilanen, and M. Gyllenberg. 1996. Minimum viable metapopulation size. American Naturalist 147:527-541. HDR Engineering Inc. 2012. 2012 Dakota skipper survey report: Center to Grand Forks 345kV transmission report. Higgins, J., G. E. Larson, and K. Higgins, F. 2000. Floristic Comparisons of Tallgrass Prairie Remnants Managed by Different Land Stewardships in Eastern South Dakota. Pages 21- 31 in 17th North American Prairie Conference, North Iowa Area Community College, Mason City, Iowa. Higgins, J. J. 1999. Floristics and cover characteristics of native tallgrass prairie remnants in eastern South Dakota. M.S. South Dakota State University, Brookings. Holland, W. J. 1931. The butterfly book. Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc., Garden City, NY. Holzman, R. W. 1972. Eastern range extension for Oarisma powesheik Parker (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). The Great Lakes Entomologist 5:111-114. Huber, M. and R. Knutti. 2011. Anthropogenic and natural warming inferred from changes in Earth's energy balance. Nature Geoscience:1-6. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland. Jackson, L. L. 1999. Establishing tallgrass prairie on grazed permanent pasture in the Upper Midwest. Restoration Ecology 7:127-138. Jog, S., K. Kindscher, E. Questad, B. Foster, and H. Loring. 2006. Floristic Quality as an Indicator of Native Species Diversity in Managed Grasslands. Natural Areas Journal 26:149-167. Johnson, W. C., B. V. Millett, T. Gilmanov, R. A. Voldseth, G. R. Guntensprergen, and D. E. Naugle. 2005. Vulnerability of Northern Prairie Wetlands to Climate Change. BioScience 55:863-872. Klassen, P., A. R. Westwood, W. B. Preston, and W. B. McKillop. 1989. The Butterflies of Manitoba. Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature, Winnipeg. Kodandarmaiah, U., E. Weingartner, N. Janz, L. Dalen, and S. Nylin. 2011. Population structure in relation to host-plant ecology and Wolbachia infestation in the comma butterfly. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24:2173-2185. LaBar, C. C. and C. B. Schultz. 2012. Investigating the role of herbicides in controlling invasive grasses in prairie habitats: effects on non-target butterflies. Natural Areas Journal 32:177- 189. Landis, D. A., A. K. Fiedler, C. A. Hamm, D. L. Cuthrell, E. H. Schools, D. R. Pearsall, M. E. Herbert, and P. J. Doran. 2012. Insect conservation in Michigan prairie fen: addressing the challenge of global change. Journal of Insect Conservation 16:131-142. Lange, H. J. D., J. Lahr, J. J. Van der Pol, Y. Wessels, and J. H. Faber. 2009. Ecological vulnerability in wildlife: An expert judgment and multicriteria analysis tool using ecological traits to assess relative impact of pollutants. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 28:2233-2240. Layberry, R., P. Hall, and D. Lafontaine. 1998. The butterflies of Canada. University of Toronto Press, Buffalo, NY. Lenz, D. 1999. Characterization of Dakota skipper habitat in the Towner-Karlsruhe prairie complex., Natural Heritage Inventory, Nature Preserves Program, North Dakota Parks and Recreation Department, Bismarck, North Dakota. Lindsey, A. W. 1917. A list of the butterflies of Iowa. Entomological News 28:347-353. Lindsey, A. W.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Native Grasses Benefit Butterflies and Moths Diane M
    AFNR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE Native Grasses Benefit Butterflies and Moths Diane M. Narem and Mary H. Meyer more than three plant families (Bernays & NATIVE GRASSES AND LEPIDOPTERA Graham 1988). Native grasses are low maintenance, drought Studies in agricultural and urban landscapes tolerant plants that provide benefits to the have shown that patches with greater landscape, including minimizing soil erosion richness of native species had higher and increasing organic matter. Native grasses richness and abundance of butterflies (Ries also provide food and shelter for numerous et al. 2001; Collinge et al. 2003) and butterfly species of butterfly and moth larvae. These and moth larvae (Burghardt et al. 2008). caterpillars use the grasses in a variety of ways. Some species feed on them by boring into the stem, mining the inside of a leaf, or IMPORTANCE OF LEPIDOPTERA building a shelter using grass leaves and silk. Lepidoptera are an important part of the ecosystem: They are an important food source for rodents, bats, birds (particularly young birds), spiders and other insects They are pollinators of wild ecosystems. Terms: Lepidoptera - Order of insects that includes moths and butterflies Dakota skipper shelter in prairie dropseed plant literature review – a scholarly paper that IMPORTANT OF NATIVE PLANTS summarizes the current knowledge of a particular topic. Native plant species support more native graminoid – herbaceous plant with a grass-like Lepidoptera species as host and food plants morphology, includes grasses, sedges, and rushes than exotic plant species. This is partially due to the host-specificity of many species richness - the number of different species Lepidoptera that have evolved to feed on represented in an ecological community, certain species, genus, or families of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Strategy for the Dakota Skipper (Hesperia Dacotae) in Canada
    Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Recovery Strategy for the Dakota Skipper (Hesperia dacotae) in Canada Dakota Skipper 2007 About the Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series What is the Species at Risk Act (SARA)? SARA is the Act developed by the federal government as a key contribution to the common national effort to protect and conserve species at risk in Canada. SARA came into force in 2003, and one of its purposes is “to provide for the recovery of wildlife species that are extirpated, endangered or threatened as a result of human activity.” What is recovery? In the context of species at risk conservation, recovery is the process by which the decline of an endangered, threatened, or extirpated species is arrested or reversed, and threats are removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of the species’ persistence in the wild. A species will be considered recovered when its long-term persistence in the wild has been secured. What is a recovery strategy? A recovery strategy is a planning document that identifies what needs to be done to arrest or reverse the decline of a species. It sets goals and objectives and identifies the main areas of activities to be undertaken. Detailed planning is done at the action plan stage. Recovery strategy development is a commitment of all provinces and territories and of three federal agencies — Environment Canada, Parks Canada Agency, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada — under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk. Sections 37–46 of SARA (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/the_act/default_e.cfm) outline both the required content and the process for developing recovery strategies published in this series.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Dakota Skipper (Hesperia Dacotae Skinner) in Eastern South Dakota and the Effects of Land Management
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2020 The Status of Dakota Skipper (Hesperia dacotae Skinner) in Eastern South Dakota and the Effects of Land Management Kendal Annette Davis South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Kendal Annette, "The Status of Dakota Skipper (Hesperia dacotae Skinner) in Eastern South Dakota and the Effects of Land Management" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3914. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/3914 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE STATUS OF DAKOTA SKIPPER (HESPERIA DACOTAE SKINNER) IN EASTERN SOUTH DAKOTA AND THE EFFECTS OF LAND MANAGEMENT BY KENDAL ANNETTE DAVIS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Major in Plant Sciences South Dakota State University 2020 ii THESIS ACCEPTANCE PAGE KENDAL ANNETTE DAVIS This thesis is approved as a creditable and independent investigation by a candidate for the master’s degree and is acceptable for meeting the thesis requirements for this degree. Acceptance of this does not imply that the conclusions reached by the candidate are necessarily the conclusions of the major department. Paul Johnson Advisor Date David Wright Department Head Date Dean, Graduate School Date iii AKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I want to thank my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottoe Skipper (Hesperia Ottoe)
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Ottoe Skipper Hesperia ottoe in Canada ENDANGERED 2005 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2005. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Ottoe Skipper Hesperia ottoe in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 26 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Dr. Reginald P. Webster for writing the status report on the Ottoe Skipper Hesperia ottoe prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Theresa Fowler, the COSEWIC Arthropods Species Specialist Subcommittee Co-chair. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Ếgalement disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur de l'hespérie ottoé (Hesperia ottoe) au Canada. Cover illustration: Ottoe skipper — Male (top) and female (bottom) of Hesperia ottoe. Photos provided by the author. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2005 Catalogue No. CW69-14/448-2005E-PDF ISBN 0-662-40660-5 HTML: CW69-14/448-2005E-HTML 0-662-40661-3 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – May 2005 Common name Ottoe Skipper Scientific name Hesperia ottoe Status Endangered Reason for designation This species has been found at very few locations in the Canadian prairies where it is associated with fragmented and declining mixed-grass prairie vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Prairie Conservation Plan
    Landscape Habitat Management for Prairie Grouse - Build It & They Will Come Minnesota Prairie Conservation Plan A habitat plan for native prairie, grassland and wetlands in the Prairie Region of western Minnesota 2nd edition, 2018 Blazing star plants at Glacial Lakes State Park © Alison Mickelson1\ Greater Good Photography Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................... 3 Foreword ......................................................................................................................... 4 A Vision for the Future of Minnesota’s Prairie Region ..................................................... 5 Purpose of a Minnesota Prairie Landscape Plan .............................................................. 5 Prairie and Grasslands in Minnesota ............................................................................... 7 Functioning Prairie Systems ............................................................................................ 9 Threats to Prairie Systems in Minnesota ....................................................................... 12 Multifunctional Landscapes: An Economic Strategy ..................................................... 18 Conservation Strategies for Prairie Landscapes ............................................................ 20 Three Approaches for Targeting Prairie Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Dakota Skipper (Hesperia Dacotae) Report on the Species Status Assessment Version 2 - September 2018
    Dakota Skipper (Hesperia dacotae) Report on the Species Status Assessment Version 2 - September 2018 Photo: Phil Delphey Acknowledgements This document was prepared by the following U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service staff: Andrew Horton (Region 3, Twin Cities Ecological Services Field Office), Jennifer Szymanski (Region 3, Regional Office, Div. of Endangered Species), Phil Delphey (Region 3, Regional Office, Division of Endangered Species), Tara Nicolaysen (Headquarters Office, Division of Ecological Services), Sara Vacek (Region 3, Morris Wetland Management District), Laura Hubers (Region 6, Waubay NWR), Cami Dixon (R6, Regional Office, Division of Scientific Resources), and Becky Esser (Region 3, Detroit Lakes Wetland Management District). We would like to recognize the following Dakota skipper experts for participating in the expert elicitation process: Robert Dana (retired, MN Department of Natural Resources), Jerry Selby (Ecological and GIS Services, Indianola, IA), Ron Royer (retired, Minot State University), Erik Runquist (Minnesota Zoo, MN), and Richard Westwood (University of Winnipeg, Manitoba). Additionally, the following people reviewed a draft version and provided helpful comments: Richard Baker and Jessica Petterson (MN Department of Natural Resources), Robert Dana, Curt Bradbury (NRCS), Richard Westwood, Eileen Dowd Stuckel (South Dakota Department of Natural Resources), Katherine Kral (North Dakota State University), and Alisa Shull (Region 3, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). Suggested Reference U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species status assessment report for the Dakota skipper (Hesperia dacotae). 97 pp. i Executive Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) developed a species status assessment (SSA) for the Dakota skipper (Hesperia dacotae), which was listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Dakota Skipper (Hesperia Dacotae) and Poweshiek Skipperling
    Dakota Skipper (Hesperia dacotae) and Poweshiek Skipperling (Oarisma poweshiek) Survey Report for the Crowned Ridge I Wind Facility, Codington and Grant Counties, South Dakota NOVEMBER 2018 PREPARED FOR Crowned Ridge Wind, LLC PREPARED BY SWCA Environmental Consultants DAKOTA SKIPPER (HESPERIA DACOTAE) AND POWESHIEK SKIPPERLING (OARISMA POWESHIEK) SURVEY REPORT FOR THE CROWNED RIDGE I WIND FACILITY, CODINGTON AND GRANT COUNTIES, SOUTH DAKOTA Prepared for Crowned Ridge Wind, LLC 700 Universe Boulevard Juno Beach, Florida 33408 Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants 116 North 4th Street Bismarck, North Dakota 58501 (701) 258-6622 www.swca.com SWCA Project No. 44511 November 2018 Dakota Skipper (Hesperia dacotae) and Poweshiek Skipperling (Oarisma poweshiek) Survey Report for the Crowned Ridge I Wind Facility, Codington and Grant Counties, South Dakota CONTENTS 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Methods ................................................................................................................................................. 1 3 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 3 4 Discussion ............................................................................................................................................. 6 5 Literature Cited ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aspen Parklands SFRMP Assessment I 09/01/09 Public Review Draft Introduction
    09/01/09 Public Review Draft Introduction Table of Contents List of Tables, Figures, Charts, and Maps .................................................................................... iii Brief Description of the Planning Area ........................................................................................ vi Subsection Forest Resource Management Planning (SFRMP) Introduction ......................................................................................................................... viii Goals for the Planning Effort .............................................................................................. viii Process .................................................................................................................................. ix Relationship of SFRMP to Other DNR Planning Efforts ...................................................... x Application of Statewide Guidelines .................................................................................. xiv Grouping of DNR Direction Documents by 3-Level Hierarchy ....................................... xviii Public Involvement .............................................................................................................. xx SFRMP Process Table ........................................................................................................ xxi Issue Identification ............................................................................................................. xxii Public Review ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES HABITAT DESCRIPTIONS (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) APPENDIX E Special Status Species Habitat Descriptions
    APPENDIX E - SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES HABITAT DESCRIPTIONS (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) APPENDIX E Special Status Species Habitat Descriptions American Burying Beetle The American burying beetle is the largest of the carrion beetles in North America. The life cycle of the beetle includes approximately two to three months underground as larvae and pupae during the summer with adults also present underground during winter. The adults provide the larvae with a food source underground during this period. The species has been found in a variety of habitats (i.e. woodlands, prairies) in areas with relatively non-compacted soils, containing a measurable layer of humus or leaf litter, and with high prey abundance (Creighton and Schnell 1998, Lomolino and Creighton 1996, USFWS 1991). This noctural species will travel several miles to a variety of soil and habitat types if the appropriate food sources are available (Lomolino et al. 1995). American burying beetles are currently known to occur in counties in south-central South Dakota (Backlund et al. 2008); however, historic records exist from Brookings County (Backlund and Marrone 1997). Topeka Shiner The Topeka shiner (Notropis topeka) is a small, silvery minnow, typically less than 3 inches in total length, that occurs primarily in clear pools in small streams within prairie or former prairie streams. Current habitat for this species is limited to only a few watersheds in the United States; however within these watersheds the species may be found in relatively high abundance (Dahle 2001, 69 FR 44736-44770). Diet for this species is highly diverse, including vegetation matter, zooplankton, and small aquatic invertebrates (69 FR 44736-44770).
    [Show full text]
  • (Skinner) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) Iowa, Minneso
    STATUS ASSESSMENT and CONSERVATION GUIDELINES Dakota Skipper Hesperia dacotae (Skinner) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Manitoba Jean Fitts Cochrane and Philip Delphey • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Twin Cities Field Office January 2002 Disclaimer This document is a compilation of biological data and a description of past, present, and likely future threats to the Dakota skipper (Hesperia dacotae). It does not represent a decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on whether this species should be designated as a candidate for listing as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will make that decision after reviewing this document, other relevant biological and threat data not including herein, and all relevant laws, regulations, and policies. The results of the decision will be posted on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Region 3 Web site, http://www.fws.gov/r3pao/eco_serv/endangrd/lists/concem.html. If designated as a candidate species, it will subsequently be added to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's candidate species list that is periodically published in the Federal Register and posted on the World Wide Web, http ://endangered.fws. gov/. Even if the species does not warrant candidate status it should benefit from the conservation recommendations contained in this document. — • n TABLE OF CONTENTS Part One: Status Assessment 1 I. Introduction 1 II. Species Information 1 A. Classification and Nomenclature 1 B. Description of the Species 2 C. Summary of Habitat, Biology, and Ecology 3 D. Range and Population Trends 11 EL Population Assessment ."....".....21 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior
    Vol. 79 Friday, No. 206 October 24, 2014 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Species Status for Dakota Skipper and Endangered Species Status for Poweshiek Skipperling; Final Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:13 Oct 23, 2014 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\24OCR2.SGM 24OCR2 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES 63672 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 206 / Friday, October 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Executive Summary Previous Federal Action Fish and Wildlife Service Why we need to publish a rule. Under Please refer to the proposed listing the Endangered Species Act, a species rule for the Dakota skipper and 50 CFR Part 17 may warrant protection through listing Poweshiek skipperling (78 FR 63574; if it is endangered or threatened October 24, 2013) for a detailed throughout all or a significant portion of [Docket No. FWS–R3–ES–2013–0043; description of previous Federal actions 4500030113: 4500030113] its range. Listing a species as an concerning this species. endangered or threatened species can Background only be completed by issuing a rule. RIN 1018–AY01 This rule will finalize the listing of the Please refer to the proposed listing Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Dakota skipper (Hesperia dacotae) as a rule for the Dakota skipper and the and Plants; Threatened Species Status threatened species and the Poweshiek Poweshiek skipperling (78 FR 63574; for Dakota Skipper and Endangered skipperling (Oarisma poweshiek) as an October 24, 2013) for a summary of Species Status for Poweshiek endangered species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Iowa's Lepidoptera
    Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS Volume 105 Number Article 9 1998 The Status of Iowa's Lepidoptera Dennis W. Schlicht Timothy T. Orwig Morningside College Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright © Copyright 1998 by the Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/jias Part of the Anthropology Commons, Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Schlicht, Dennis W. and Orwig, Timothy T. (1998) "The Status of Iowa's Lepidoptera," Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS, 105(2), 82-88. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/jias/vol105/iss2/9 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jour. Iowa Acad. Sci. 105(2):82-88, 1998 The Status of Iowa's Lepidoptera DENNIS W. SCHLICHT1 and TIMOTHY T. ORWIG2 1 Iowa Lepidoptera Project, 1108 First Avenue, Center Point, Iowa 52213. 2 Morningside College, Sioux City, Iowa 51106. Including strays, 122 species of butterflies have been confirmed in Iowa. However, since European settlement the populations of taxa of Iowa Lepidoptera have declined. While certain generalist species have experienced declines, species with life cycles that include native habitats, especially prairies and wetlands, have been particularly vulnerable. In a 1994 revision of the Iowa endangered and threatened species list, the Natural Resource Commission (NRC) listed two species of butterflies as endangered, five as threatened, and 25 as special concern, using general legal definitions of those rankings (NRC 1994).
    [Show full text]