DOCSLIB.ORG

Aspen Parklands SFRMP Assessment I 09/01/09 Public Review Draft Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aspen Parklands SFRMP Assessment I 09/01/09 Public Review Draft Introduction 09/01/09 Public Review Draft Introduction Table of Contents List of Tables, Figures, Charts, and Maps .................................................................................... iii Brief Description of the Planning Area ........................................................................................ vi Subsection Forest Resource Management Planning (SFRMP) Introduction ......................................................................................................................... viii Goals for the Planning Effort .............................................................................................. viii Process .................................................................................................................................. ix Relationship of SFRMP to Other DNR Planning Efforts ...................................................... x Application of Statewide Guidelines .................................................................................. xiv Grouping of DNR Direction Documents by 3-Level Hierarchy ....................................... xviii Public Involvement .............................................................................................................. xx SFRMP Process Table ........................................................................................................ xxi Issue Identification ............................................................................................................. xxii Public Review .................................................................................................................... xxii Preliminary Issues ...................................................................................................................... xxiii Assessment Chapters 1. Land Use and Cover ..................................................................................................... 1.1 2. Land Ownership and Administration ........................................................................... 2.1 3. Forest Composition and Structure ................................................................................ 3.1 4. Timber Harvest............................................................................................................. 4.1 5. Ecological Information................................................................................................. 5.1 6. Stand Damage and Mortality ....................................................................................... 6.1 7. Wildlife Species Status and Trends.............................................................................. 7.1 Appendices A. Background on DNR Forest Inventory and Data Currency ......................................... A.3 B. Ecological Classification System ................................................................................ A.5 C. Glossary ....................................................................................................................... A.9 D. Acronyms ................................................................................................................... A.31 Note: A basic set of large format color maps showing subsection characteristics is available for viewing at DNR Bemidji Region Forestry Office: 6603 Bemidji Avenue North; Bemidji, Minnesota 56601 and the DNR Central Office (Forestry, 5th Floor). This report is available on the DNR Web site at: www.dnr.state.mn.us/forestry/subsection/aspenparklands/index.html Maps in this chapter depict information for an area within a “planning boundary.” This boundary is designed to closely approximate the subsection while capturing data summary and planning efficiencies by using survey or jurisdiction lines in some cases. Aspen Parklands SFRMP Assessment i 09/01/09 Public Review Draft Introduction Printed documents will be available for review at the Minnesota DNR Northwest Region Headquarters at 6603 Bemidji Ave N, Bemidji, Minnesota, and on compact disk by request to Pat Matuseski at (218) 308- 2381 or [email protected]. ii Aspen Parklands SFRMP Assessment 09/01/09 Public Review Draft Introduction Lists of Tables, Figures, Charts, and Maps Tables Table I Public Involvement and Process Timelines ......................................................................... xxi Table 1.1 Minnesota GAP Land Cover Classification System ........................................................ 1.4 Table 2.1 Aspen Parklands Subsection…Land Ownership by Subsections .................................... 2.2 Table 3.1 Cover Type Acres by Age-Class ...................................................................................... 3.3 Table 3.2 State Timberland Cover Type Acres and Percentages ................................................... 3.4 Table 3.3 Designated old-growth acres in the Aspen Parklands Subsection ............................... 3.16 Table 3.4 Historical Forest Composition Comparison ................................................................ 3.17 Table 4.1 Aspen Parklands Subsection- Acres of Timber Sold FY 2000-2009 ............................... 4.2 Table 5.1 Minnesota Listed Species – Animals ............................................................................... 5.8 Table 5.2 Minnesota Listed Species – Plants .................................................................................. 5.9 Table 5.3 Minnesota Listed Species –“NONs” Animals ............................................................... 5.11 Table 5.4 Minnesota Listed Species –“NONs” Plants ................................................................. 5.11 Table 5.5 Aspen Species in Greatest Conservation Need ............................................................. 5.12 Table 5.6 Aspen Parklands Subsection: MCBS Status.................................................................. 5.15 Table 6.1Acres Affected and Acres of Mortality by Species ........................................................... 6.4 Table 6.2 Native and Exotic Insects and Disease in the Aspen Parklands Subsection ................... 6.5 Table 6.3 Acres of aspen damage by symptom, ausal agents unknown. ....................................... 6.7 Table 7.1 Terrestrial, Vertebrate Species List ................................................................................ 7.3 Table 7.2 Mammal habitat relationships by Minnesota Gap Analysis Project land cover type ... 7.13 Table 7.3 Bird habitat relationships by Minnesota Gap Analysis Project land cover type .......... 7.15 Table 7.4 Amphibian and Reptile habitat relationships by Minnesota Gap Analysis Project land cover type ................................................................................................................................................ 7.23 Figures Figure I Grouping of DNR Direction documents by 3-Level Hierarchy ...................................... xviii Figure ii Public Involvement Opportunities ..................................................................................... xx Charts Chart i Aspen Parklands Subsection Land Ownership ................................................................... vii Chart 1.1Aspen Parklands Subsection GAP Cover Type Percentages .......................................... 1.4 Chart 2.1Aspen Parklands Subsection Land Administration .......................................................... 2.2 Chart 3.2.1 All Timberland Cover Types Age-Class Distribution .................................................. 3.6 Chart 3.2.2 Ash/Lowland Hardwoods Age-Class Distribution ....................................................... 3.7 Aspen Parklands SFRMP Assessment iii 09/01/09 Public Review Draft Introduction Chart 3.2.3 Aspen/balm of Gilead Age-Class Distribution ........................................................... 3.8 Chart 3.2.4 Lowland Black Spruce Age-Class Distribution ........................................................... 3.9 Chart 3.2.5 Jack Pine Age-Class Distribution .............................................................................. 3.10 Chart 3.2.6 Northern White Cedar Age-Class Distribution ......................................................... 3.11 Chart 3.2.7 Northern Hardwoods Age-Class Distribution ........................................................... 3.12 Chart 3.2.8 Oak Age-Class Distribution- ..................................................................................... 3.13 Chart 3.2.9 Tamarack Age-Class Distribution ............................................................................. 3.14 Chart 4.1 Acres of Timber Sold FY 2000-2009 .............................................................................. 4.2 Chart 4.2 Timber Volume by FY 2000-2009 ................................................................................... 4.3 Chart 4.3 Value of Timber by FY 2000-2009 .................................................................................. 4.4 Chart 4.4 Average Price of Timber by FY 1997-2006 .................................................................... 4.5 Chart 4.5 Average Volume Sold by Species 2000-2009 .................................................................. 4.6 Maps Map i Generalized Forest Cover Types .............................................................................................. v Map 1.2 GAP Land Cover Types .................................................................................................... 1.5 Map 2.1 Land Ownership ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Records of Microlepidoptera in Alberta, Canada
    Volume 59 2005 Number 2 Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 59(2), 2005, 61-82 NEW RECORDS OF MICROLEPIDOPTERA IN ALBERTA, CANADA GREGORY R. POHL Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 email: [email protected] CHARLES D. BIRD Box 22, Erskine, Alberta, Canada T0C 1G0 email: [email protected] JEAN-FRANÇOIS LANDRY Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 email: [email protected] AND GARY G. ANWEILER E.H. Strickland Entomology Museum, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2H1 email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Fifty-seven species of microlepidoptera are reported as new for the Province of Alberta, based primarily on speci- mens in the Northern Forestry Research Collection of the Canadian Forest Service, the University of Alberta Strickland Museum, the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, and the personal collections of the first two authors. These new records are in the families Eriocraniidae, Prodoxidae, Tineidae, Psychidae, Gracillariidae, Ypsolophidae, Plutellidae, Acrolepi- idae, Glyphipterigidae, Elachistidae, Glyphidoceridae, Coleophoridae, Gelechiidae, Xyloryctidae, Sesiidae, Tortricidae, Schrecken- steiniidae, Epermeniidae, Pyralidae, and Crambidae. These records represent the first published report of the families Eriocrani- idae and Glyphidoceridae in Alberta, of Acrolepiidae in western Canada, and of Schreckensteiniidae in Canada. Tetragma gei, Tegeticula
    [Show full text]
  • An Extra-Limital Population of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs, Cynomys Ludovicianus, in Central Alberta
    46 THE CANADIAN FIELD -N ATURALIST Vol. 126 An Extra-Limital Population of Black-tailed Prairie Dogs, Cynomys ludovicianus, in Central Alberta HELEN E. T REFRY 1 and GEOFFREY L. H OLROYD 2 1Environment Canada, 4999-98 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2X3 Canada; email: [email protected] 2Environment Canada, 4999-98 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2X3 Canada Trefry, Helen E., and Geoffrey L. Holroyd. 2012. An extra-limital population of Black-tailed Prairie Dogs, Cynomys ludovicianus, in central Alberta. Canadian Field-Naturalist 126(1): 4 6–49. An introduced population of Black-tailed Prairie Dogs, Cynomys ludovicianus, has persisted for the past 50 years east of Edmonton, Alberta, over 600 km northwest of the natural prairie range of the species. This colony has slowly expanded at this northern latitude within a transition ecotone between the Boreal Plains ecozone and the Prairies ecozone. Although this colony is derived from escaped animals, it is worth documenting, as it represents a significant disjunct range extension for the species and it is separated from the sylvatic plague ( Yersina pestis ) that threatens southern populations. The unique northern location of these Black-tailed Prairie Dogs makes them valuable for the study of adaptability and geographic variation, with implications for climate change impacts on the species, which is threatened in Canada. Key Words: Black-tailed Prairie Dog, Cynomys ludovicianus, extra-limital occurrence, Alberta. Black-tailed Prairie Dogs ( Cynomys ludovicianus ) Among the animals he displayed were three Black- occur from northern Mexico through the Great Plains tailed Prairie Dogs, a male and two females, originat - of the United States to southern Canada, where they ing from the Dixon ranch colony southeast of Val Marie are found only in Saskatchewan (Banfield 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Creek PP 32 • Vocabulary and Definitions 4 • Key Messages 7 • Pre-Trip Discussion 8 YOUR DAY in the FIELD • Schedule 13 • Student Data Forms 14
    ECOSYSTEMS AND IMPACTS IN FISH CREEK PROVINCIAL PARK A Field Study for Grade 11 Students FISH CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTRE www.Fish-Creek.org FISH CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTRE 1 ECOSYSTEMS AND IMPACTS: GRADE 11 FIELD STUDY Introduction Ecosytems and Impacts is a full-day field study directed by park staff. The field study is designed to cover a portion of the requirements for Biology 20, Unit B: Ecosystems and Population Change. Fish Creek Provincial Park is one of Canada’s largest urban provincial parks, stretching from the western edge of the city to the Bow River. The park has a strong vision within its visitor services program plan to support and foster environmental and cultural education. Alberta Parks acknowledges that Fish Creek Provincial Park is part of the traditional territory of Treaty 7 region in Southern Alberta, which includes the Blackfoot Confederacy (comprising Siksika, Piikani and Kainai First Nations), the Tsuut’ina First Nation, and the Stoney Nakoda First Nation. The City of Calgary is also home to Metis Nation of Alberta, Region III. Table of Contents BEFORE THE VISIT APPENDIX • Preparation 3 • Map to Fish Creek PP 32 • Vocabulary and Definitions 4 • Key Messages 7 • Pre-trip Discussion 8 YOUR DAY IN THE FIELD • Schedule 13 • Student Data Forms 14 2 FISH CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTRE Before the Visit PREPARATION What to Bring It is most important that you, your students • Extra clothing (rain gear, warm layers) and your volunteers/chaperons know and • Boots, insulated and waterproof if the understand that your field study will be an weather calls for it “OUTDOOR” experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Declines of Populus Tremuloides in North America Linked to Climate ⇑ James J
    Forest Ecology and Management 299 (2013) 35–51 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Managemen t journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Recent declines of Populus tremuloides in North America linked to climate ⇑ James J. Worrall a, , Gerald E. Rehfeldt b, Andreas Hamann c, Edward H. Hogg d, Suzanne B. Marchetti a, Michael Michaelian d, Laura K. Gray c a US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Gunnison, CO 81230, USA b US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, ID 83843, USA c University of Alberta, Dept. of Renewable Resources, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H1 d Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 article info abstract Article history: Populus tremuloides (trembling aspen) recently experie nced extensive crown thinning,branch dieback, Available online 29 January 2013 and mortality across North America. To investigate the role of climate, we developed a range-wide bio- climate model that characterizes clima tic factors controlling distribution ofaspen. We also examined Keywords: indices of moisture stress, insect defoliation and other factors as potential causes of the decline. Historic Decline climate records show that most decline regions experienced exceptionally severe droug htpreceding the Dieback recent episodes. The bioclimate model, driven primarily by maximum summer temperature sand April– Die-off September precipitation, shows that decline tended to occur in marginally suitable habitat, and that cli- Drought matic suitability decreased markedly in the period leading up to decline in almost all decline regions. Climate envelope Climatic niche Other factors, notably multi- year defoliation bytent caterpillars (Malacosoma spp.) and stem damage by fungi and insects, also play a substantial role in decline episodes, and may amplify or prolong the impacts of moisture stress on aspen over large areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Drive an Historic Alberta Highway
    Drive an Historic Alberta Highway Item Type text; Article Authors Irving, Barry D. Citation Irving, B. D. (1994). Drive an Historic Alberta Highway. Rangelands, 16(2), 55-58. Publisher Society for Range Management Journal Rangelands Rights Copyright © Society for Range Management. Download date 05/10/2021 19:59:49 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/638995 RANGELANDS 16(2), April 1994 Drive an Historic Alberta Highway Barry D. Irving Dearest, I have tried to give yousome idea of my life in this uniquecorner of the Great Lone Land. I hope 1 have not tired you. I expect in return a full account of your new life, which is so very different from mine, though no happier. My life may seem rough and bare, but there is somethingto compen- sate onefor every hardship and trial. You must come andsee me, though,for it is thespirit of theWest that charms one, andI can't conveyit to you, try as I may. It is a shy wild spirit and will not leave its native mountainsand rolling prairies and, though / try to getit into my letters, / can't. / must warnyou that if it once charmsyou, itbecomes an obsessionand one I grows very lonely away from it. No Westerner who has feltits fascinationever is really contentagain in I the conventionalEast.—(lnderwick 1884) This is an excerpt from a letter written in the period around 1884by arancher's wife. The Inderwickranch was located inthe southern Albertafoothills. This shortquota- tion captures the essence of early settlement life in Alberta, hardships with compensation.
    [Show full text]
  • References Cited in Dakota Skipper and Poweshiek Skipperling Proposed Listing Rule
    References Cited in Dakota skipper and Poweshiek skipperling proposed listing rule Bahm, M. A., T. G. Barnes, and K. C. Jensen. 2011. Restoring Native Plant Communities in Smooth Brome (Bromus inermis)– Dominated Grasslands. Invasive Plant Science and Management 4:239-250. Belcher, J. W. and S. D. Wilson. 1989. Leafy Spurge and the Species Composition of a Mixed- Grass Prairie. Journal of Range Management 42:172-175. Bess, J. A. 1988. An insect survey of eight fens in southern Michigan., Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing, MI. Beyers, B. 2012. Killer in a Bottle? Household insecticides may play a role in declining bee populations. University of Minnesota. Blatchley, W. S. 1891. A catalogue of the butterflies known to occur in Indiana. Annual Report of the Indiana State Geologist 17:365-408. Boettcher, J. F., T. B. Bragg, and D. M. Sutherland. 1993. Floristic Diversity in Ten Tallgrass Prairie Remnants of Eastern Nebraska. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/116 XX:33-40. Borkin, S. S. 1995. 1994 Ecological Studies of the Poweshiek Skipper (Oarisma poweshiek) in Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI. Borkin, S. S. 2000. Proposal for outplanting on a state natural area., Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI. Borkin, S. S. 1995. 1994 Ecological Studies of the Poweshiek Skipper (Oarisma poweshiek) in Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI. Borkin, S. 1996. Ecological studies of the Poweshiek skipper (Oarisma poweshiek) in Wisconsin -1995 Season Summary. Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI. Bragg, T. B. 1995. The physical environment of Great Plains grasslands. Pages 11-37 in K.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Grasses Benefit Butterflies and Moths Diane M
    AFNR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE Native Grasses Benefit Butterflies and Moths Diane M. Narem and Mary H. Meyer more than three plant families (Bernays & NATIVE GRASSES AND LEPIDOPTERA Graham 1988). Native grasses are low maintenance, drought Studies in agricultural and urban landscapes tolerant plants that provide benefits to the have shown that patches with greater landscape, including minimizing soil erosion richness of native species had higher and increasing organic matter. Native grasses richness and abundance of butterflies (Ries also provide food and shelter for numerous et al. 2001; Collinge et al. 2003) and butterfly species of butterfly and moth larvae. These and moth larvae (Burghardt et al. 2008). caterpillars use the grasses in a variety of ways. Some species feed on them by boring into the stem, mining the inside of a leaf, or IMPORTANCE OF LEPIDOPTERA building a shelter using grass leaves and silk. Lepidoptera are an important part of the ecosystem: They are an important food source for rodents, bats, birds (particularly young birds), spiders and other insects They are pollinators of wild ecosystems. Terms: Lepidoptera - Order of insects that includes moths and butterflies Dakota skipper shelter in prairie dropseed plant literature review – a scholarly paper that IMPORTANT OF NATIVE PLANTS summarizes the current knowledge of a particular topic. Native plant species support more native graminoid – herbaceous plant with a grass-like Lepidoptera species as host and food plants morphology, includes grasses, sedges, and rushes than exotic plant species. This is partially due to the host-specificity of many species richness - the number of different species Lepidoptera that have evolved to feed on represented in an ecological community, certain species, genus, or families of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Strategy for the Dakota Skipper (Hesperia Dacotae) in Canada
    Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Recovery Strategy for the Dakota Skipper (Hesperia dacotae) in Canada Dakota Skipper 2007 About the Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series What is the Species at Risk Act (SARA)? SARA is the Act developed by the federal government as a key contribution to the common national effort to protect and conserve species at risk in Canada. SARA came into force in 2003, and one of its purposes is “to provide for the recovery of wildlife species that are extirpated, endangered or threatened as a result of human activity.” What is recovery? In the context of species at risk conservation, recovery is the process by which the decline of an endangered, threatened, or extirpated species is arrested or reversed, and threats are removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of the species’ persistence in the wild. A species will be considered recovered when its long-term persistence in the wild has been secured. What is a recovery strategy? A recovery strategy is a planning document that identifies what needs to be done to arrest or reverse the decline of a species. It sets goals and objectives and identifies the main areas of activities to be undertaken. Detailed planning is done at the action plan stage. Recovery strategy development is a commitment of all provinces and territories and of three federal agencies — Environment Canada, Parks Canada Agency, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada — under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk. Sections 37–46 of SARA (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/the_act/default_e.cfm) outline both the required content and the process for developing recovery strategies published in this series.
    [Show full text]
  • Featured Species-Associated Forest Habitats: Boreal Forest and Coastal Temperate Forest
    Appendix 5.1, Page 1 Appendix 5. Key Habitats of Featured Species Appendix 5.1 Forest Habitats Featured Species-Associated Forest Habitats: Boreal Forest and Coastal Temperate Forest There are approximately 120 million acres of forestland (land with > 10% tree cover) in Alaska (Hutchison 1968). That area can be further classified depending on where it occurs in the state. The vast majority of forestland, about 107 million acres, occurs in Interior Alaska and is classified as “boreal forest.” About 13 million acres of forest occurs along Alaska’s southern coast, including the Kodiak Archipelago, Prince William Sound, and the islands and mainland of Southeast Alaska. This is classified as coastal temperate rain forest. The Cook Inlet region is considered to be a transition zone between the Interior boreal forest and the coastal temperate forest. For a map showing Alaska’s land status and forest types, see Figure 5.1 on page 2. Boreal Forest The boreal zone is a broad northern circumpolar belt that spans up to 10° of latitude in North America. The boreal forest of North America stretches from Alaska to the Rocky Mountains and eastward to the Atlantic Ocean and occupies approximately 28 % of the continental land area north of Mexico and more than 60 % of the total area of the forests of Canada and Alaska (Johnson et al. 1995). Across its range, coniferous trees make up the primary component of the boreal forest. Dominant tree species vary regionally depending on local soil conditions and variations in microclimate. Broadleaved trees, such as aspen and poplar, occur in Boreal forest, Nabesna D.
    [Show full text]
  • Visitor Guide Eat, Play, & Stay in Fort St
    Fort St. John Visitor Guide Eat, Play, & Stay in Fort St. John #liveitfsj HOME OF THE FAMOUS MILE 47 • ALASKA HIGHWAY • BRITISH COLUMBIA FORT ST. JOHN VISITOR CENTRE 9324 96 Street (inside the Pomeroy Sport Centre) 1.877.785.6037 | [email protected] www.fortstjohn.ca/tourism WE’RE OPEN YEAR-ROUND! Contents Welcome & Fast Facts 1 Travel & Transportation 2 Traveling the Alaska Highway 4 A Brief History 6 Pioneer Pathway 6 Major Events 8 Arts & Entertainment 10 What to do 11 Regional Attractions 13 City Recreation 14 City Parks 16 City Trails 17 Tap Know & Go 18 Regional Parks & Trails 19 Regional District Campsites 20 Northern Lights 21 Outdoor Adventure 22 Golfing 25 Motor Sports 26 Boating & Fishing 26 Common Trees & Plants 28 Bird Watching 29 Animals of Northern BC 31 Camping & RV Parks 34 Accommodations & RV Services 36 Where to eat 39 Places of Worship 45 Emergency & Health Services 46 Activity Page 48 Fort St. John Visitor Centre 49 Fast Facts POPULATION approx. 21,000 POPULATION WITH SURROUNDING AREA 69,000 LOCATION • 214 km west of Grande Prairie, AB (2.5 hour drive) • 478 km northeast of Prince George, BC The energy is incredible in Fort St. John – The Energetic City! Why (5 hour drive) energetic? Well, for a few reasons. “The Energetic City” reflects our large • 663 km northwest of Edmonton, AB resource base of natural gas, oil, wind and hydroelectric power, forestry (7 hour drive) and agriculture as well as the incredible vitality and spirit of our residents. • 1,237 km northeast of Vancouver, BC (14 hour drive) • 2,461 km southeast of Anchorage, Alaska Located in the heart of the majestic Peace River country, Fort St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Dakota Skipper (Hesperia Dacotae Skinner) in Eastern South Dakota and the Effects of Land Management
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2020 The Status of Dakota Skipper (Hesperia dacotae Skinner) in Eastern South Dakota and the Effects of Land Management Kendal Annette Davis South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Kendal Annette, "The Status of Dakota Skipper (Hesperia dacotae Skinner) in Eastern South Dakota and the Effects of Land Management" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3914. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/3914 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE STATUS OF DAKOTA SKIPPER (HESPERIA DACOTAE SKINNER) IN EASTERN SOUTH DAKOTA AND THE EFFECTS OF LAND MANAGEMENT BY KENDAL ANNETTE DAVIS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Major in Plant Sciences South Dakota State University 2020 ii THESIS ACCEPTANCE PAGE KENDAL ANNETTE DAVIS This thesis is approved as a creditable and independent investigation by a candidate for the master’s degree and is acceptable for meeting the thesis requirements for this degree. Acceptance of this does not imply that the conclusions reached by the candidate are necessarily the conclusions of the major department. Paul Johnson Advisor Date David Wright Department Head Date Dean, Graduate School Date iii AKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I want to thank my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Region Conservation Area Plan
    Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Edmonton and Area Land Trust ............................................................................................................... 4 Conservation and Human Footprint ........................................................................................................ 5 Alberta Natural Regions and Subregions ............................................................................................... 8 Central Parkland Subregion (Parkland Natural Region) ................................................................ 10 Dry Mixedwood Subregion (Boreal Forest Natural Region) .......................................................... 10 Central Mixedwood Subregion (Boreal Forest Natural Region) .................................................... 11 Environmentally Significant Areas ......................................................................................................... 12 Protected Areas ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Conservation Value .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]