DOCSLIB.ORG

The European Commission and the Construction of Information Society: Regulatory Law from a Processual Perspective

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The European Commission and the Construction of Information Society: Regulatory Law from a Processual Perspective A thesis presented by Katerina Sideri to the London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Law in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Law London School of Economics and Political Science London, UK June 2003 UMI Number: U615846 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615846 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 /M£S£S r %Z2.i+ I0IG<I2(o ©2003 Katerina Sideri All rights reserved To Andreas for constant support and inspiration Abstract The focus of this thesis is on information society regulation in Europe and on the European Commission when forming legislative proposals and implementing laws by means of decentred and flexible regulation, respectful of difference, seeking to promote the engagement of diverse interested parties in the formation of laws affecting them. I seek to explain the above processes in a dynamic way, breaking away with a conceptualisation of regulation as (only) efficiently pursuing the public good and neutrally mediating among autonomous communities, and public administration as being (only) about reasoned choices and rational action. Bourdieu’s theoretical tools are employed to argue that although it would be within agents’ intention to design neutral rules and within regulatory law’s original function to promote participation and deliberation, law encapsulates a vision that outruns its function and agents perceive the social world in a way that outruns perception. To illustrate this, I look at the following case studies: Architectural solutions introduced by the industry in DVDs to prevent copying, domain name dispute resolution by ICANN, Internet filters used to block harmful material on the net, and the proposal to introduce patent protection in computer-implemented inventions in the EU. In a nutshell, in the above instances the European Commission strives to reproduce or preserve its juridical, technocratic, social and symbolic capital, while one of the main strategies supported by its juridical capital is to sustain the belief in the neutrality and objectivity of regulatory law. However, the ways in which the administration perceives the potentialities inscribed in capital are subject to unspoken general cognitive schemas shaped by nationality and professional background, and by the subjective construction of notions such as recognition, reputation and communality, as formed in everyday interaction in the Commission. Yet, cognitive schemas and capital are not conceived as static, but as open to experience. In this way, although regulation is viewed as manifesting the freezing of power relations, dynamism is injected as all definitions in the field are potentially subject to re-definition, by virtue of struggles amongst the administration and interest groups, which, although they occupy different fields, strive to influence regulation. Redefinitions then result in re-orderings in the field, as for example, new forms of capital may enter it or cognitive schemas may be altered. Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisors Tim Murphy and Colin Scott for reading innumerable drafts and providing invaluable advice. This thesis would not have been possible without George Gaskell and Michael Huber who organised the PhD seminars at the Center for the Analysis of Risk and Regulation at LSE, my interviewees at the European Commission, hoping that my account of the'life inside the European Commission' does credit to the wonderful work of these people, and the financial support provided by the Graduate School and the Law Department of the LSE. The participants of the Fifth Workshop on New Scholarship in Public and Private International Law held at the European University Institute (EUI), Florence (Italy) in 2002 and of the First International Workshop for Young Scholars organised by the Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Internationales et Communautaires d'Aix- Marseille III, Faculte de droit et de science politique and European Law Journal, provided a rare opportunity for discussions of the ideas in this thesis. Finally, I would like to thank Andreas Panagopoulos for constant support and inspiration, for the endless discussions on issues of this thesis and moral encouragement at times when I thought that this work could never be completed. iv Contents Chapter I THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF INFORMATION SOCIETY Opening 1-11 A. CONCEPTUALISING REGULATION 1. From the regulatory state to the post-regulatory model of Govemace? 12-21 2. Teubner and Foucault: Decentralised regulation and systems of control 21-26 3. Reading Teubner in the light of Foucault 26-30 4. Rethinking decentralised forms of regulation: A disguise of control? 31-35 B. BOURDIEU’S THEORY OF ACTION FROM A PROCESSUAL PERSPECTIVE 1. Habitus, field, capital: Some preliminary definitions 36-39 2. Bourdieu and the multiplicity of organisation 39-45 3. The becoming of regulatory change 45-49 C. CONCLUSIONS 50-54 Chapter II INNOVATION, ECONOMY, POLITY AND THE EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE Opening 55-59 1. Economic theory and innovation 60-65 2. The socio-political context 65-68 3. Casting a critical eye 68-71 4. Transitions 71-74 A. MODERN THEORETICAL PARADIGMS 75 1. Schumpeter and the technological imperative 76-78 2. Innovation as a process and as a good 78-80 B. THE STORY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE OBJECTIVE OF MARKET INTEGRATION AND THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION 81-82 1. Ordoliberalism and market integration 82-87 2. The Common Market 87-89 3. Monnet and the ‘technocracy discourse ’ of the early days of the Community 89-92 4. The Single European Act 92-94 C. SETTING THE STAGE FOR THE LIBERALISATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND PRO-COMPETITIVE COLLABORATION 1. Liberalising Telecommunications: Early steps 95-98 2. Pre-competitive collaboration: Esprit 98-101 3. Telecommunications Liberalisation: The legal dimension 101-106 4. Re-regulation and harmonisation 106-110 5. More re-regulation 110-111 6. Information society in Europe 111-114 D. CONCLUSIONS 115-18 Appendix 1 Information Society in Europe 1992-2002: Timeline of main policy milestones 119 Chapter III INSIDE THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Opening 120-123 A. HABITUS AND MULTIPLE HABITUS: ALLOWING FOR IMPROVISATION 1. The notion of habitus 124-125 2. The possibility of introducing multiple habitus 125-129 3. From observing interaction and identifying structures to enquiring on the conditions of their emergence 129-135 vi 4. Inside the European Commission 136-138 B. LIFE INSIDE THE COMMISSION 1. Spatio-numerical concentration 139 a The spatial context 139-144 b Socialising 145-147 c The numerical context 147-149 2. Cohesion and phronesis : Uncovering relations of dependence 150 a The formal organisational characteristics of the European Commission 150-155 b Blurring hierarchical relations: Negotiating and co-operating in a microcosm of unclear hierarchies 156-157 d Promotion 160-163 e Transdepartmental dialogue 163-168 f File keeping 168-174 C. INTRODUCING RUPTURES 1. Nationality and professional background 175-180 a Nationality 180-182 b Professional background 182-185 2. Gender and national stereotypes 185-186 3. Recruitment 187-189 D. CONCLUSIONS 190-193 Appendix 1: Location of the buildings of the European Commission 194 Chapter IV THE DOXIC ELEMENT OF THE FIELD: INTERNET REGULATION Opening 195-198 A. PROCEDURALISATION, DECENTRALISATION AND INTERNET REGULATION 199-206 B. DOXA, ORTHODOXY, HETERODOXY: A THEORETICAL DISCUSSION 1. Enquiring on the properties of juridical capital 207-108 2. The sub-field of Internet regulation in Europe: Challenging the habitus of dependency and compromise 208-210 3. Symbolic capital, informational capital and doxa 210-214 4. The doxic element 2214-215 C. INTERNET REGULATION: REINVENTING THE WAYS IN WHICH POWER MAY BE EXERCISED 1. Law, code and Internet regulation 216-224 2. The juridico-administrative habitus: The effect of universality and objectivity 238-241 3. Scarce resources: Domain names allocation 224-227 4. Analysis of the problems 227-234 a Establishing the difference between the joint partnership model and the self-regulation model 234-238 b A Bourdieusian perspective 238-242 D. THE INTERNET ACTION PLAN: THE DIFFICULTY IN SEPARATING PROCEDURES FROM NORMS 1. The Safer Internet Action Plan 243-244 2. Committees and the importance of collecting information 244-246 3. Implementing the Plan a Self-regulation and the development of codes of conduct 246-247 b Developing filtering and rating systems 248 c Analysis: Problems with using filters to block harmful material 248-253 E. CONCLUSIONS 254-256 Chapter V SOCIAL CAPITAL: THE CONSTRUCTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION Opening 257-258 A. SOCIAL CAPITAL 259 1. Coleman, Hirschman, Putnam and Fukuyama 260-265 2. Bourdieu and social capital 265-269 B. SOCIAL CAPITAL AND NETWORKS IN EUROPEAN GOVERNANCE 1. The European Union as a new system of governance 270-274 2. An example of social capital nurtured in committees 274-280 3. The feasibility of strengthening the civil society by reinforcing trust and achieving consensus 280-283 4. A Bourdieusian perspective: Criticism and shortcomings 283-286 C. SOFTWARE PATENTS 1. Basics of software copyright and patent protection in the EU 287-290 2. Problems: What is a technical problem? 291-294 3. The Consultation 294 a Group’s propositions 294-298 b Some statistics 298-301 3. Different cognitive schemas and power asymmetries 302-303 a Patterns of thinking about intellectual property: The European Commission 303-307 b EuroLinux alliance 308-311 4.
Recommended publications
  • Global Challenges, European Responses

    Global Challenges, European Responses

    European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels 5 - 8 October 2009 PROGRAMME Global challenges, European responses The programme of the 7th OPEN DAYS will consist of 125 seminars, workshops, debates and exhibitions between 5 and 8 Global challenges, October 2009 for around 7,000 participants. More than 250 event partners have joined forces, among which 213 regions and cities from 33 European countries, and more than 600 speakers will be actively involved. During the month of October another 230 local events will be organised addressing an expected audience of 30,000. The event’s key objective is to facilitate exchange, debate and networking among Europe’s experts and decision-makers in regional and local development from the European responses public, private and financial sector. Under the overall headline “Global challenges, European responses”, all events will be organised around four themes: • Restoring growth: Innovation in Europe’s regions and cities • Regions and climate change: Europe’s way to sustainable regional development • Territorial cooperation: Working together across borders • Achieving results, looking ahead: EU Cohesion Policy’s evaluation and future prospects More information and registration at: www.opendays.europa.eu European Commission OPEN DAYS Hotline: Rue Belliard 101 DG Regional Policy + 33 1 43 67 99 44 1040 Brussels BE-1049 Brussels [email protected] www.cor.europa.eu www.ec.europa.eu/regional policy Published in August 2009 Edited by the Committee of the Regions and DG Regional Policy of the European
  • The Institutional Politics of the European Union : an Analysis of Administrative Governance and Constitutional Reform in the EU

    The Institutional Politics of the European Union : an Analysis of Administrative Governance and Constitutional Reform in the EU

    The institutional politics of the European Union : an analysis of administrative governance and constitutional reform in the EU Citation for published version (APA): Christiansen, T. (2008). The institutional politics of the European Union : an analysis of administrative governance and constitutional reform in the EU. Maastricht University. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20080215tc Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2008 DOI: 10.26481/dis.20080215tc Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
  • 2021 DG DEFIS Management Plan

    2021 DG DEFIS Management Plan

    Management Plan 2021 DG Defence Industry and Space EUR [number] EN Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 PART 1. Delivering on the Commission’s priorities: main outputs for the year ...................... 5 A. A European Green Deal ......................................................................................................................... 5 B. A Europe fit for the digital age ......................................................................................................... 7 C. A stronger Europe in the world ...................................................................................................... 18 D. Promoting our European way of life ........................................................................................... 23 PART 2. Modernising the administration: main outputs for the year........................................ 29 E. Human resource management ...................................................................................................... 29 F. Sound financial management ........................................................................................................ 31 G. Fraud risk management .................................................................................................................... 32 H. Digital transformation and information management ...................................................... 33 I. Sound environmental
  • Copernicus User Uptake Activities

    Copernicus User Uptake Activities

    F O S T E R I N G T H E U P T A K E O F C O P E R N I C U S A N D S P A C E A P P L I C A T I O N S JULY 2017 Space EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Directorate I — Space Policy, Copernicus and Defence Unit I.3 — Copernicus European Commission B-1049 Brussels F O S T E R I N G T H E U P T A K E O F C O P E R N I C U S A N D S P A C E A P P L I C A T I O N S FOSTERING THE UPTAKE OF COPERNICUS & SPACE APPLICATIONS 3 FOSTERING THE UPTAKE OF COPERNICUS & SPACE APPLICATIONS E X EC U T I V E S U M M A R Y IMPLEMENTING THE 2016 SPACE STRATEGY This document presents the state of play of the Copernicus user uptake strategy. As written in the Space Strategy, "The potential of space solutions has not yet been fully exploited (…). The space sector needs to be better connected to other policies and economic areas". However, most space data – including Copernicus - cannot be used directly by end users. The key objective of the Copernicus user uptake strategy is thus to support an ecosystem of service providers (public or private) that transform space data into accessible and usable information. Historically, only a few organisations had the expertise and fi nancial means to "run this last mile".
  • The Enlarged European Commission European Commission

    The Enlarged European Commission European Commission

    Policy Paper n°11 The Enlarged European Commission.Commission. John Peterson John Peterson John Peterson is Professor of International Politics at the University of Edinburgh. He has previously held posts at the Universities of Glasgow, York, Essex, Oxford, and the University of California. He has been a visiting researcher or professor at the Universities of Vienna, Paris, California (Berkeley), University College Dublin, the Centre for European Policy Studies (Brussels), and the College of Europe (Bruges). Current or recent works include: Europe and America: Partners and Rivals in International Relations (Rowman and Littlefield, 2006, forthcoming, 3rd edition) ; The Institutions of the European Union (co-edited with Michael Shackleton, Oxford University Press, 2005, forthcoming, 2nd edition) ; Europe, America, Bush: Transatlantic Relations in the 21st Century (co-edited with Mark Pollack, Routledge, 2003) ; Integration in an Expanding European Union: Reassessing the Fundamentals (co-edited with J H H Weiler and Iain Begg, Blackwell, 2003) Professor Peterson edits the 'New European Union' series (together with Helen Wallace) for Oxford University Press, and was editor of the Journal of Common Market Studies from 1998- 2003. He was educated at Ithaca College, the University of California (Santa Barbara), and the London School of Economics and Political Science. Notre Europe Notre Europe is an independent research and policy unit whose objective is the study of Europe – its history and civilisations, integration process and future prospects. The association was founded by Jacques Delors in the autumn of 1996. It has a small team of six in-house researchers from various countries. Notre Europe participates in public debate in two ways.
  • Journal of Hip Hop Studies

    Journal of Hip Hop Studies

    et al.: Journal of Hip Hop Studies Published by VCU Scholars Compass, 2014 1 Journal of Hip Hop Studies, Vol. 1 [2014], Iss. 1, Art. 1 Editor in Chief: Daniel White Hodge, North Park University Book Review Editor: Gabriel B. Tait, Arkansas State University Associate Editors: Cassandra Chaney, Louisiana State University Jeffrey L. Coleman, St. Mary’s College of Maryland Monica Miller, Lehigh University Editorial Board: Dr. Rachelle Ankney, North Park University Dr. Jason J. Campbell, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Jim Dekker, Cornerstone University Ms. Martha Diaz, New York University Mr. Earle Fisher, Rhodes College/Abyssinian Baptist Church, United States Dr. Daymond Glenn, Warner Pacific College Dr. Deshonna Collier-Goubil, Biola University Dr. Kamasi Hill, Interdenominational Theological Center Dr. Andre Johnson, Memphis Theological Seminary Dr. David Leonard, Washington State University Dr. Terry Lindsay, North Park University Ms. Velda Love, North Park University Dr. Anthony J. Nocella II, Hamline University Dr. Priya Parmar, SUNY Brooklyn, New York Dr. Soong-Chan Rah, North Park University Dr. Rupert Simms, North Park University Dr. Darron Smith, University of Tennessee Health Science Center Dr. Jules Thompson, University Minnesota, Twin Cities Dr. Mary Trujillo, North Park University Dr. Edgar Tyson, Fordham University Dr. Ebony A. Utley, California State University Long Beach, United States Dr. Don C. Sawyer III, Quinnipiac University Media & Print Manager: Travis Harris https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/jhhs/vol1/iss1/1 2 et al.: Journal of Hip Hop Studies Sponsored By: North Park Universities Center for Youth Ministry Studies (http://www.northpark.edu/Centers/Center-for-Youth-Ministry-Studies) . FO I ITH M I ,I T R T IDIE .ORT ~ PAru<.UN~V RSllY Save The Kids Foundation (http://savethekidsgroup.org/) 511<, a f't.dly volunteer 3raSS-roots or3an:za6on rooted :n h;,P ho,P and transf'orMat:ve j us6c.e, advocates f'or alternat:ves to, and the end d, the :nc..arc.eration of' al I youth .
  • Strategic Plan a Collaborative Vision for the Movement Through 2015

    Strategic Plan a Collaborative Vision for the Movement Through 2015

    Wikimedia Strategic Plan A collaborative vision for the movement through 2015 February 2011 Strategy... the Wikimedia way The strategic plan is the culmination of a collaborative In July 2009, we launched our first-ever strategy-development project designed process undertaken by the Wikimedia Foundation and the to produce a five-year strategic plan for the Wikimedia movement. global community of Wikimedia project volunteers through From the outset, we believed that an open process would result in a smarter, more 2009 and 2010. The process aimed to understand and effective strategy. Just as Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone can edit, we wanted address the critical challenges and opportunities facing the the strategy project to invite participation from anyone who wanted to help. Wikimedia movement through 2015. It has culminated in a As the project unfolded, more than 1,000 people from around the world contributed series of priorities and goals, as well as specific operational in more than 50 languages. We received more than 900 proposals aiming to meet a initiatives for the Wikimedia Foundation, that will define the wide variety of challenges and opportunities. We conducted more than 65 interviews with experts and advisers. We carried out a survey of more than 1,200 lapsed editors. movement’s continued success. And we staged hundreds of discussions both face-to-face in cities around the world, and via IRC, Skype, mailing lists and wiki pages. The Wikimedia Foundation is the U.S.-based 501(c)(3) Non-profit strategy consultancy The Bridgespan Group provided frameworks, data non-profit organization that operates and manages the and analysis.
  • Retrospektive Berlinale Classics Veranstaltungen 7

    Retrospektive Berlinale Classics Veranstaltungen 7

    RETROSPEKTIVE BERLINALE CLASSICS VERANSTALTUNGEN 7. BIS 17. FEBRUAR 2019 20161102_LogobalkenA5HF_148x17_RZ.indd 1 08.11.16 12:07 SelBSTBeSTimmT. PerSPekTiven von filmemacHerinnen Senator Cosmopolite Rainer Rother Das Filmschaffen von Regisseurinnen in der Zeit von 1968 bis 1999 ist Thema der Retro- spektive der 69. Internationalen Filmfestspiele Berlin. Die von der Deutschen Kinema- thek kuratierte Auswahl umfasst 28 Spiel- und Dokumentarfilme aus der DDR sowie aus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland vor und nach 1990. Zudem werden rund 20 kurze und mittellange Filme als Vorfilme oder im Rahmen von zwei Kurzfilmprogrammen gezeigt. Gemeinsam ist den Filmemacherinnen und ihren Protagonist/innen das Interesse an der Erkundung eigener Lebensräume und die Suche nach einer eigenen filmischen Sprache. Die ausgewählten Filme reflektieren, jeweils geprägt von den sich wandelnden Lebens- und Produktionsbedingungen, den Umgang mit Körper, Raum und gesellschaftlichen Beziehungen sowie mit Alltag und Arbeit. In vielen Fällen bildet die persönliche Ge- schichte der Filmemacherinnen den erzählerischen Ausgangspunkt. Neben den über- wiegend unabhängigen Produktionen haben Filmemacherinnen in diesen Jahrzehnten aber auch Genrefilme realisiert, mit denen sie den Mainstream bedienten. 34 Regisseu- rinnen werden ihre ausgewählten Filme dem Publikum während der Berlinale präsen- tieren – noch nie gab es eine Berlinale Retrospektive mit so vielen Gästen. Besonderer Dank für die Unterstützung gilt German Films und weiteren Partnern des diesjährigen Programms: der DEFA-Stiftung, dem DFF – Deutsches Filminstitut & Film- museum, dem Arsenal – Institut für Film und Videokunst e.V. sowie dem Bundesarchiv- Filmarchiv. Beijing · Dresden · Dubai · Geneva · Hong Kong · Macau · Madrid · Nanjing · Paris Shanghai · Shenyang · Singapore · Tokyo · Vienna · Xian 1 Retrospektive_GO_SEN_Cosmopolite_148x198mm_Berlinale_ENG.indd 1 19.12.2018 13:56:34 Das Private ist politisch … kreativen Schaffen widmen konnten.
  • 755 Final COMMUNICATION from the COMMISSION on BUILDINGS P

    755 Final COMMUNICATION from the COMMISSION on BUILDINGS P

    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 10.12.2003 COM(2003) 755 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION ON BUILDINGS POLICY AND INFRASTRUCTURES IN BRUSSELS EN EN CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 3 2. PRINCIPLES FOR ACTION ...................................................................................... 5 2.1. Integrating the Commission’s buildings into the urban fabric..................................... 5 2.1.1. Diversifying activities in the European Quarter........................................................... 5 2.1.2. Developing Europe’s image......................................................................................... 5 2.1.3. Defining the urban planning framework...................................................................... 6 2.2. Improving the accessibility and quality of Commission buildings.............................. 7 2.2.1. The accessibility of buildings....................................................................................... 7 2.2.2. Building quality............................................................................................................ 8 2.3. A policy of mobility..................................................................................................... 8 2.3.1. Journeys between the various Commission buildings ................................................. 9 2.3.2. Journeys to the workplace.........................................................................................
  • User Requirements for a Copernicus Polar Mission

    User Requirements for a Copernicus Polar Mission

    User Requirements for a Copernicus Polar Mission Phase 2 Report - High-level mission requirements Guy Duchossois Peter Strobl Vincent Toumazou (Eds.) 2018 EUR 29144 EN This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Peter Strobl Address: Via Fermi, TP123, 21027 Ispra, Italy Email: [email protected] Tel.: +39 0332 78 6695 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC111068 EUR 29144 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-80960-6 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/44170 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 © European Union, 2018 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. How to cite this report: Duchossois G., P. Strobl, V. Toumazou, S. Antunes, A. Bartsch, T. Diehl, F. Dinessen, P. Eriksson, G. Garric, K. Holmlund, M-N. Houssais, M. Jindrova, M. Kern, J. Muñoz-Sabater, T. Nagler, O. Nordbeck, E. de Witte, User Requirements for a Copernicus Polar Mission - Phase 2 Report, EUR 29144 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018, ISBN 978-92-79-80960-6, doi:10.2760/44170, JRC111068 All images unless otherwise stated © European Union 2018 Title image source: https://pixabay.com/en/norway-arctic-circle-arctic-3010436/ Table of Contents 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................
  • Management Plan 2019 Ref

    Management Plan 2019 Ref

    DG GROW Management Plan 2019 Ref. Ares(2019)583247 - 01/02/2019 Management Plan 2019 DG GROW 1 DG GROW Management Plan 2019 Contents PART 1. Overview of main outputs for the year ............................................................. 3 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3 Priority 1 - A new boost for jobs, growth and investment .............................. 4 Priority 2 - A connected Digital Single Market ................................................... 11 Priority 4 - A Deeper and Fairer Internal Market with a Strengthened Industrial Base ............................................................................................................. 11 Contributing to Priority 6 - A balanced and progressive trade policy to harness globalisation - as well as to Priorities 1 and 4 ................................ 21 Priority 9 - A stronger global actor ......................................................................... 22 PART 2. Organisational management main outputs for the year .................................. 24 A. Human Resource Management ........................................................................... 24 B. Financial Management: Internal control and Risk management ........... 26 C. Information management aspects ...................................................................... 28 D. Better Regulation (only for DGs managing regulatory acquis) ..................... 31 E. External communication activities
  • Tron &#8211; Tod Eines Hackers

    Tron – Tod Eines Hackers

    Tron – Tod eines Hackers Von Burkhard Schröder Broschiert: 221 Seiten Verlag: Rowohlt Tb. (Dezember 1999) ISBN-10: 349960857X ISBN-13: 978-3499608575 Tron – Tod eines Hackers (kaufen via Amazon) Inhaltsverzeichnis und Vorwort zur Online-Ausgabe, August 2002 Suche im Zentralen Verzeichnis Antiquarischer Bücher Pressekonferenz – am 29.11.99 – Fotos von Dietmar Gust Materialien zum Buch Auszug aus einem Brief Markus Kuhns an die Los Angeles Times, Juli 2002 „Streitfeld, David“ wrote on 2002-07-08 19:24 UTC:I am a reporter for the Los Angeles Times working on a story about smart card hacking. i wanted to ask you about Boris F[…]. The German journalist Burkhard Schröder wrote a book on the case. I think that both his presentation of the case and the conclusions he maked are the most sensible ones that I have seen so far, therefore I’d like to refer you to him as a more well-informed source. Do you think his death was a suicide? From all I know, this seems to be the most plausible hypothesis. Why do so many people think he was killed, even if it’s unclear by who? Lack of an obvious motive, plus he was affiliated with the Chaos Computer Club in Berlin, a highly media-active association that includes quite a number of conspiracy theory enthusiasts.“ Eidesstattliche Versicherung – des Autors zur vom Anwalt der Eltern angestrebten Unterlassungserklärung Diplomarbeit Boris Floricic: „Realisierung einer Verschlüsselungstechnik für Daten im ISDN B-Kanal“ Diplom.rar – download der Diplomarbeit Fundort der Leiche (65KB) Irdeto-Chip 1 – Originalgrösse des gesamten Chips: 10×6 mm (©ADSR) ADSR – Beschriftung: Speicherarten ROM, RAM, EEPROM (47 KB) Irdeto-Chip 2 – Detailansicht (©ADSR) Irdeto-Chip 3 – Grössenverhältnis Chip 1 und Detailansicht Chip 2 Fotos des ISDN-Telefons – von Tron, ©Dietmar Gust Yedioth Ahronoth – 20.11.98, Israel, Ausriss (98 KB) Trons FTP-Server – samt Traceroute d-box – schematische Darstellung I d-box – schematische Darstellung II Trons Handschrift Andreas H.