DOCSLIB.ORG

The God-World Relationship Between Joseph Bracken, Philip Clayton, and the Open Theism Dong-Sik Park Claremont Graduate University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The God-World Relationship Between Joseph Bracken, Philip Clayton, and the Open Theism Dong-Sik Park Claremont Graduate University Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CGU Theses & Dissertations CGU Student Scholarship 2012 The God-World Relationship Between Joseph Bracken, Philip Clayton, and the Open Theism Dong-Sik Park Claremont Graduate University Recommended Citation Park, Dong-Sik, "The God-World Relationship Between Joseph Bracken, Philip Clayton, and the Open Theism" (2012). CGU Theses & Dissertations. Paper 43. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/43 DOI: 10.5642/cguetd/43 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the CGU Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in CGU Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The God-World Relationship between Joseph Bracken, Philip Clayton, and the Open Theism Doctor of Philosophy Dong-Sik Park Claremont Graduate University Claremont, Los Angeles 2012 APPROVAL OF THE DISSERTATION COMMITTEE We, the undersigned, certify that we have read, reviewed, and critiqued the dissertation of Dong-Sik Park and do hereby approve it as adequate in scope and quality for meriting the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Philip Clayton Vice President for Academic Affairs and Dean Claremont School of Theology ________________________________ Anselm Min Maguire Distinguished Professor of Religion Claremont Graduate University ________________________________ Ingolf Dalferth Danforth Professor of Philosophy of Religion Claremont Graduate University Abstract of the Dissertation The God-World Relationship between Joseph Bracken, Philip Clayton, and the Open Theism by Dong-Sik Park Claremont Graduate University: 2012 This dissertation investigates the God-world relationship between Joseph Bracken as a process theologian, Philip Clayton as a panentheist, and the open theism. They have affinities and differences as conversational partners in their multilayered relations. Their common question must be as follows: “What does it mean to believe in God today?” In this dissertation I compare their respectively theological perspectives and explore their affinities and differences. Many scholars have already noted more affinities than untenable differences among Bracken’s theology, Clayton’s panentheism, and the open theism. On the one hand, even though theological perspectives of Bracken and Clayton are obviously different from each other, they are both influenced in specific ways by Whitehead. On the other hand, open theism is a movement that emphasizes “the openness of God,” from within evangelical theism. The fact that there is even within classical theism the pursuit of new models of God such as revised classical theism or modified classical theism might suggest the need for contemporary models of God in philosophical theology. This dissertation will thus explore philosophical theologies that are proper both to the biblical faith and intellectual earnestness, that is, 居敬窮Ó ( geo (to live) kyeong (piety) kung (to acknowledge) li (reason) ) in Eastern philosophy, which means distinctions but not separation between piety and intelligence, and that stand between classical theism and “orthodox” process theism. If there is no consistency among biblical, rational and existential descriptions of God, how can we establish philosophical theologies? Our theological task is to frame a new constructive theology whose primary aspect must synthesize both classical theism and process theology in the hermeneutical circle. For example, this new theism admits an infinitely qualitative difference between God and the world, as well as a really radical relation between God and the world. Aspects and domains do not encroach upon each other. Acknowledgements I am really grateful to my doctor father, Philip Clayton, who taught me especially panentheism and science and religion and who led me to a way of theology of integration, making a balance between liberal theology and conservative theology. I also thank two committee members, Anselm Min and Ingolf Dalferth. I give my thanks as well to ChulhoYoun who taught me philosophical theology in relational thought and who is a professor in Presbyterian College and Theological Seminary in Korea, to a Rev. SoonChang Lee who is my mentor and a senior pastor in Yonshin Church in Korea, and to Joohyang Church (Rev. Shin Kim) in Los Angeles and to Myungsung Church (Rev. Samwhan Kim) in Korea who supported my financial help needs. I really thank my wife, Ji-Young Oh. Without her sacrificial help, I could not make this work. I want to thank my beloved daughter and son, Eunyou and John. And without the prayer and support of family in Korea, I could not finish this study. Finally, thank to God. “Glory to God in the highest and on earth peace to men!” v Preface What are the raisons d’etre of theology? It is natural that one lacks something in one’s life. In order to rectify such a lack, one may achieve a vicarious pleasure through anyone who does not have the same part lacking. For example, someone who does not sing a song well may achieve the ability to do so by listening to the song as it is sung by other singers. Someone who does not exercise well may achieve the ability to do so by watching the play as it is played by other sport players. Such examples can be countless. What, then, is the ultimate lack in human beings in general? It is neither money nor fame nor social position. If it were any of these, those who are rich, famous, or in high social positions should be happy and satisfied with their lives. However, we know that they are not. The ultimate human concern lies beyond such mundane phenomena; the ultimate problem for humans, the problem we cannot solve, is the problem of salvation, although some religions maintain the possibility of human salvation in humanity. To that extent, then, humans may suppose “God” in order to satisfy their lack. In that sense, Feuerbach’s thesis, “God is the projection of human consciousness,” must be a wonderful insight. Feuerbach deploys this thesis in the perspective of atheism, but, if we elaborately develop this argument, we can meet a confession of another tone, that is, it is God that is the highest word which we can confess in human language. The faith we have, “God exists,” finally supports that it is not a fiction. Thus to confess God in a seemingly atheistic time is a more brave and valuable confession than not to confess God. vi In this dissertation I use some methods such as systematic theology, comparative theology between different scholars, the authority of the Bible, and various examples of human life. 1 In order to solve the problem of God, I have chosen three figures: a modified process theologian (Joseph Bracken), a panentheist (Philip Clayton), and modified classical theists (Open theists). In Chapter I, I begin to explore the problem of God in many skeptical elements and attempt to find a possible alternative from philosophical theology. In Chapter II-Chapter VI, I investigate theological characteristics of the model of God advanced by Bracken, Clayton, and the Open theists in order to show the affinities and differences between them. In Chapter VII, I present and defend a philosophical theology which synthesizes classical theism and process theism, and which I will call Trinitarian Panentheistic Theology (TPT). Giving the Trinity the position as the first adjective form in Trinitarian Panentheistic Theology, panentheism in this dissertation is based on the Trinity itself. The Trinity and panentheism have common grounds, i.e., God’s transcendence and God’s immanence in the relation between God and the world. By bridging with divine action four categories from classical theism— Creatio ex Nihilo , Trinity, Transcendence, and Worship—and one category from process theology, Dipolar God, I will depend the model of TPT. Central features of exposition include: Kenotic God, Relational God, Suffering God, Knowable God, and Revised Power of God (the voluntarily self-limiting God). 1 As a matter of fact, many theologians have been ignoring each individual’s life story in theology because they consider the individual story not as God’s talk but just as trivial talk. However, we need to rethink this in that theology happens between my (human) story and God’s story; each individual story already contains its own theological implications. For the believer, that story becomes “the story of God’s self-revelation” and is, for the Christian, also “the story of God’s redemptive work in Christ.” Philip Clayton, Transforming Christian Theology (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2010), 85, 94, and 137. vii Table of Contents Abstract Acknowledgements Preface Chapter I: Methodology and Theory of Knowledge 1 Chapter II: Joseph Bracken’s Neo-Whiteheadian Perspective 33 Chapter III: Philip Clayton’s Panentheism 57 Chapter IV: Open Theism 91 Chapter V: Affinities and Differences between These Philosophical Theologies 118 Chapter VI: Constructive Theological Proposal toward a Trinitarian Panentheistic Theology 136 Chapter VII: A Model of Theism as a Synthesis of Classical Theism and Process Theism 163 1. From Classical Theology 164 1) Creatio ex Nihilo 169 2) Trinity 173 3) Transcendence and Immanence 191 4) Worship 204 2. Conceptual Resources from Process Theism: Dipolar God 208 3. Divine Action 215 4. TPT Model 251 1) Kenotic God 252 2) Relational God 256 3) Suffering God 266 4) Knowable God 291 5) Revised Understanding of the Power of God and the Knowledge of God A) The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Harmonising God's Sovereignty and Man's Free Will
    Introduction Historical Overview Arminianism & Calvinism Molinism Criticisms Conclusion An Introduction to Molinism Harmonising God’s Sovereignty and Man’s Free Will Wessel Venter http://www.siyach.org/ 2016-06-07 Introduction Historical Overview Arminianism & Calvinism Molinism Criticisms Conclusion Introduction Introduction Historical Overview Arminianism & Calvinism Molinism Criticisms Conclusion Mysteries of the Christian Faith 1. How can God be One, but Three Persons? 2. How can Jesus simultaneously be fully man and fully God? 3. How can God be sovereign over our lives, yet people still have free will? Introduction Historical Overview Arminianism & Calvinism Molinism Criticisms Conclusion Mysteries of the Christian Faith 1. How can God be One, but Three Persons? 2. How can Jesus simultaneously be fully man and fully God? 3. How can God be sovereign over our lives, yet people still have free will? Introduction Historical Overview Arminianism & Calvinism Molinism Criticisms Conclusion Table of Contents 4 Molinism 1 Introduction Definition of Molinism Preliminary Definitions Counterfactuals 2 Historical Overview Middle Knowledge Pelagian Controversy 5 Objections and Criticisms Thomas Aquinas Miscellaneous The Reformation Thinly Veiled Open Theism The Counter-Reformation The Truth/Existence of Further History CCFs Secular Debate Divine Voodoo Worlds 3 Arminianism and Calvinism Grounding Problem Arminianism Not Biblical Calvinism 6 Applications and Conclusion Arminianism vs Calvinism Applications Introduction Historical Overview Arminianism & Calvinism Molinism Criticisms Conclusion Definitions Preliminary DefinitionsI Definition (Soteriology[9]) “The study of salvation.” In Christianity this includes topics such as regeneration, election, predestination, repentance, sanctification, justification, glorification, etc. Definition (Possible World) A world that could have been, if history had progressed differently. E.g., if there was not a traffic jam, I would not have been late for work on Monday.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Charles Hartshorne's Concept of God
    THE DIVINE BECOMING: AN EXAMINATION OF CHARLES HARTSHORNE'S CONCEPT OF GOD By TERRY RICHARD HALL ~ Bachelor of Arts Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1971 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirem~nts for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS July, 1975 \he~~_s l ~15 1-111'fcl verf· ;;L STATE UNl'.'ERSITY Liaf<ARY OCT 23 1975 THE DIVINE BECOMING: AN EXAMINATION OF CHARLES HARTSHORNE'S CONCEPT OF GOD Thesis Approved: Dean of the Gl'a!uate C9llege 923517 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge my debt to t~e members of the Philosophy Department· at Oklahoma. State University. They have helped immeasurably in.my sometimes faltering efforts to achieve intellectual maturity. I, would like to espe­ cially mention Dr. Walter Scott, my thesis adviser, and Dr. Edward La~ry, who first.acquainted me with the thought of Charles Hartshorne. They have been a constant source of aid and encouragement in my· attempts to think through the topics covered in this thesis; without, their guidance and advice this-thesis could not, have been written. In addi­ tton, grateful appreciation is·· extended to Professor Charles. Hartshorne; with whom I was privileged to discuss some of these ideas during his visit to the Oklahoma State Univer­ sity campus in the spring of.1975. I am also grateful for the patien'l; assistance of my Wife, Valerie. It·is a singular good fortune.when one's wife is also a philosopher, and many of the.ideas treated herein became clearer as a result of her perceptive com­ ments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Point of Departure of Fundamental Theology
    Teresianum 45 (1994/2) 439-455 THE POINT OF DEPARTURE OF FUNDAMENTAL THEOLOGY EDWIN DINIZ The course of fundamental theology is still subject to morphological changes and the various endeavours in the course of the history of theology show, that this course still re­ mains to be defined, if it is to be defined at all. Attempts have been made in this brief reflection to give a short historical glimpse on the subject and then to decipher its identity in the context of theological studies. Finally, without entering the field of the scope or aim of fundamental theology, attention has been concentrated on the point of de­ parture in the study of fundamental theology. Historical Glimpse The expression «fundamental theology» can lead one to think in different directions1 with various meanings, but it has certainly nothing to do with «fundamentalism».2 The fun­ damental theology is engaged in giving a justification for the faith in front of human reason and in the course of the his- 1 There are sufficient indications of literature in this field, given by M a x S e c k l e r , Fundamentaltheologie: Aufgaben und Aufbau, Begriff und Na­ men. in «Handbuch der Fundamentaltheologie» Bd. IV, pg. 513-514. See al­ so Pie’ i N i n o t , Tratado de Teologia Fundamental. ‘Dar razon de la esperanza’ (I. Pe. 3, 13), Salamanca, 1989, pg. 26-54.. 2 Regarding this argument of «fundamentalism» Cfr. K l a u s K ie n z l e r , Der neue Fundamentalismus, Duesseldorf, 1 9 9 0 ; W o l f g a n g R e i n e r t , Katholi­ scher Fundamentalismus, Regensburg, 1 9 9 1 ; C h r is t ia n J a e g g i and D a v id J .
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciling Universal Salvation and Freedom of Choice in Origen of Alexandria
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Dissertations (1934 -) Projects Reconciling Universal Salvation and Freedom of Choice in Origen of Alexandria Lee W. Sytsma Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Sytsma, Lee W., "Reconciling Universal Salvation and Freedom of Choice in Origen of Alexandria" (2018). Dissertations (1934 -). 769. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/769 RECONCILING UNIVERSAL SALVATION AND FREEDOM OF CHOICE IN ORIGEN OF ALEXANDRIA by Lee W. Sytsma, B.A., M.T.S. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2018 ABSTRACT RECONCILING UNIVERSAL SALVATION AND FREEDOM OF CHOICE IN ORIGEN OF ALEXANDRIA Lee W. Sytsma, B.A., M.T.S. Marquette University, 2018 Origen has traditionally been famous for his universalism, but many scholars now express doubt that Origen believed in a universal and permanent apocatastasis. This is because many scholars are convinced that Origen’s teaching on moral autonomy (or freedom of choice) is logically incompatible with the notion that God foreordains every soul’s future destiny. Those few scholars who do argue that Origen believed in both moral autonomy and universal salvation either do not know how to reconcile these two views in Origen’s theology, or their proposed “solutions” are not convincing. In this dissertation I make two preliminary arguments which allow the question of logical compatibility to come into focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Reasonable Nonbelief Exist?
    Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers Volume 18 Issue 1 Article 6 1-1-2001 Does Reasonable Nonbelief Exist? Douglas V. Henry Follow this and additional works at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy Recommended Citation Henry, Douglas V. (2001) "Does Reasonable Nonbelief Exist?," Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers: Vol. 18 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. DOI: 10.5840/faithphil200118114 Available at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy/vol18/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers by an authorized editor of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. DOES REASONABLE NONBELIEF EXIST? Douglas V. Henry J. L. Schellenberg's Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason claims that the exis­ tence of reflective persons who long to solve the problem of God's existence but cannot do so constitutes an evil rendering God's existence in1probable. In this essay, I present Schellenberg's argument and argue that the kind of reasonable nonbelief Schellenberg needs for his argument to succeed is unlikely to exist. Since Schellenberg's argument is an inductive-style version of the problem of evil, the empirical improbability of the premise Ichallenge renders the conclusions derived fron1 it empirically improbable as well. 1. Introduction In Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason, J. L. Schellenberg presents a special version of the problem of evil, one that is an interesting, significant, and genuinely new contribution to the scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • An Anselmian Approach to Divine Simplicity
    Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers Volume 37 Issue 3 Article 3 7-1-2020 An Anselmian Approach to Divine Simplicity Katherin A. Rogers Follow this and additional works at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy Recommended Citation Rogers, Katherin A. (2020) "An Anselmian Approach to Divine Simplicity," Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers: Vol. 37 : Iss. 3 , Article 3. DOI: 10.37977/faithphil.2020.37.3.3 Available at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy/vol37/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers by an authorized editor of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. applyparastyle "fig//caption/p[1]" parastyle "FigCapt" applyparastyle "fig" parastyle "Figure" AQ1–AQ5 AN ANSELMIAN APPROACH TO DIVINE SIMPLICITY Katherin A. Rogers The doctrine of divine simplicity (DDS) is an important aspect of the clas- sical theism of philosophers like Augustine, Anselm, and Thomas Aquinas. Recently the doctrine has been defended in a Thomist mode using the intrin- sic/extrinsic distinction. I argue that this approach entails problems which can be avoided by taking Anselm’s more Neoplatonic line. This does involve AQ6 accepting some controversial claims: for example, that time is isotemporal and that God inevitably does the best. The most difficult problem involves trying to reconcile created libertarian free will with the Anselmian DDS. But for those attracted to DDS the Anselmian approach is worth considering.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Sharing Economy: Redefining Industries Borders and Reinventing the Concept of Mobility
    Department of Business and Management Chair of Entrepreneurship & Innovation The Evolution of the Sharing Economy: Redefining Industries Borders and Reinventing the Concept of Mobility Prof. GIUSEPPE D’ALESSANDRO Prof. LUIGI GUBITOSI SUPERVISOR CO-SUPERVISOR VITTORIO DI LASCIO 705731 CANDIDATE Academic Year 2019/2020 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1 Definition and leading principles of the concept of Sharing Economy ............................................. 4 1.2 Enabling Technology for Collaborative Consumption .......................................................................... 10 1.3 Cultural Elements influencing Sharing Economy ................................................................................. 18 1.3.1 How TooGoodToGo sensitizes against food waste ........................................................................................ 25 2 Evolution of the idea of Transportation with Sharing Economy ........................................................... 28 2.1 Innovative Platform reinventing Peer-To-Peer transportation .............................................................. 29 2.1.1 BUSINESS CASE: BlaBlaCar .............................................................................................................................. 33 2.1.2 BUSINESS CASE: Uber ..................................................................................................................................... 37 2.2 Car Sharing Services: from carmakers to mobility providers ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marquette History of Theology
    MARQUETTE HISTORY OF THEOLOGY VOLUME II: LATE MEDIEVAL TO 1800 Edited by Patrick Carey In Collaboration With Michel René Barnes Alexander Golitzin Mickey Mattox Marcus Wriedt David Schultenover Wanda Zemler-Cizewski 1 CONTENTS SECTION I: LATE MEDIEVAL THEOLOGY, 1350-1500 Jean Gerson ............................................................ 1 On Mystical Theology .............................................. 2 Jean Gerson: Selections from A Deo exivit, Contra curiositatem studentium and De mystica theologia speculativa, ed. and trans. Steven E. Ozment, Textus Minores, vol. 38 (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1969), 47–73, 85–89. Gabriel Biel ........................................................... 13 The Circumcision of the Lord ....................................... 14 Heiko Augustinus Oberman, Forerunners of the Reformation: The Shape of Late Medieval Thought (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966), 165–74. Desiderius Erasmus ..................................................... 22 The Praise of Folly ................................................ 23 Karl F. Thompson, ed., Middle Ages, Renaissance, and Reformation, 3rd ed., Classics of Western Thought, vol. 2 (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1980), 286–302. Excerpts from Desiderius Erasmus, The Praise of Folly, trans. by Hoyt Hopewell Hudson (copyright 1941 © 1969 by Princeton University Press; Princeton Paperback, 1970), 16–125. SECTION II: BYZANTINE CHURCH, 1350-1800 Nicholas Cabasilas ...................................................... 36 The Life in Christ ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Gnostic Catechism
    Ecclesia Gnostica A Gnostic Catechism Prepared by The Most Reverend Stephan A. Hoeller Los Angeles, California A.D. 1998 © Stephan A. Hoeller, 1998 Electronic Edition printed by The Gnostic Society Press, 2010 ii CONTENTS Preface ____________________________________________________________________ v Prayers and Creeds _____________________________________________________ 1 Lesson I. Of God And The Universe ___________________________________ 8 Lesson II. Of The Spiritual Worlds and the Demiurge ____________ 13 Lesson III. Of the Human Being ______________________________________ 18 Lesson IV. Of Gnosis and Salvation __________________________________ 21 Lesson V. Of the Lord Christ __________________________________________ 24 Lesson VI. Of Our Lady Sophia _______________________________________ 28 Lesson VII. Of the Holy Spirit and Grace ____________________________ 32 Lesson VIII. Of the Church and the Communion of Saints _______ 35 Lesson IX. Of the Sacraments or Mysteries ________________________ 41 Lesson X. Of the Sacraments, Considered Singly: Part I _________ 45 Lesson XI. Of the Sacraments, Considered Singly: Part II ________ 51 Appendix A. Prayer ____________________________________________________ 56 Appendix B. The Gnostic in the World ______________________________ 57 Bibliography ____________________________________________________________ 58 iii iv P R E F A C E Why a Gnostic Catechism? "A Gnostic Catechism? What a preposterous idea and a contradiction in terms to boot!" Such and similar objections are likely to be forthcoming in response to the present effort. The word "catechism" readily conjures up visions of dogmatic belief, enshrined in rigidly formulated articles and designed to be memorized and mindlessly recited by children and by adults of childish minds. Yet a catechism is truly but a compendium of instructions, usually of a religious nature, arranged in the form of questions and answers.
    [Show full text]
  • General Terms and Conditions for Passengers United
    General Terms and Conditions for Passengers United Kingdom/Valid as of September 2019 of mytaxi Network Limited, Harling House, Floor 2, 47-51 Great Suffolk Street, London SE1 0BS ​ (hereinafter: "FREE NOW"), company number 07477274. Introductory Provisions: These General Terms and Conditions for Passengers ("Terms and ​ Conditions") apply to the services which are offered by FREE NOW to the Passengers ("FREE NOW Services") via the FREE NOW app (also referred to as “the App”) or the FREE NOW website or via websites and apps operated by third party cooperation partners ("Third Party Services"). Please read these Terms and Conditions carefully, in particular section 4, which tells you about the cancellation fees you may have to pay, and section 5, which tells you about the processing fees you may have to pay should you not make a payment on time. The use of the Third Party Services may be subject to additional terms and conditions of such third party cooperation partners. The Terms and Conditions apply to Passengers that use the FREE NOW Services in the United Kingdom. The Terms and Conditions shall apply in addition to any other terms and conditions additionally agreed between the parties. Any individual agreements entered into by the parties shall prevail over the Terms and Conditions and any other terms and conditions. In order to register for and use the FREE NOW Services, the Passenger is required to accept during the registration process these Terms and Conditions to be concluded between FREE NOW as the provider of the FREE NOW Services and the Passenger. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Demian Marc Wheeler, Ph.D
    Curriculum Vitae Updated September 2019 Demian Marc Wheeler, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Philosophical Theology and Religious Studies Director of Advanced Studies United Theological Seminary of the Twin Cities 767 Eustis Street, Suite 140 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55114 651.255.6135 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. Union Theological Seminary • New York, New York 2014 Dissertation: “Pragmatic Historicism and Its Problems” Advisor: Gary Dorrien M.Phil. Union Theological Seminary • New York, New York 2012 Consortium: Theology Area of Specialization: American Theological Liberalism M.A. Iliff School of Theology • Denver, Colorado 2004 With Distinction Concentration: Theology B.S. University of Valley Forge • Phoenixville, Pennsylvania 1999 Magna Cum Laude Major: Pastoral Ministry ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2018-Present Director of Advanced Studies United Theological Seminary of the Twin Cities • Saint Paul, Minnesota 2017-Present Assistant Professor of Philosophical Theology and Religious Studies United Theological Seminary of the Twin Cities • Saint Paul, Minnesota 2015-2017 Louisville Institute Postdoctoral Fellow United Theological Seminary of the Twin Cities • Saint Paul, Minnesota 2014-2015 Adjunct Lecturer Marymount Manhattan College • New York, New York PUBLICATIONS Books Religion within the Limits of History Alone: Pragmatic Historicism and the Future of Theology. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press, 2020. Edited Volumes Conceiving an Alternative: Philosophical Resources for an Ecological Civilization, co-edited with David E. Conner. Anoka, Minnesota: Process Century Press, 2019. Journal Articles “Bernard Loomer as a Bridge between Whitehead and Tillich: Towards a Ground-of-Being Process Theology,” The Bulletin of the North American Paul Tillich Society 44, No. 1 (January 2018): 22-29. “Is a Process Form of Ecstatic Naturalism Possible? A Reading of Donald Crosby,” American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 37, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of the Problem 1
    Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF OPEN THEISM WITH THE DOCTRINE OF INERRANCY A Report Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Theology by Stuart M. Mattfield 29 December 2014 Copyright © 2015 by Stuart M. Mattfield All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS As with all things, the first-fruits of my praise goes to God: Father, Son and Spirit. I pray this work brings Him glory and honor. To my love and wife, Heidi Ann: You have been my calm, my sanity, my helpful critic, and my biggest support. Thank you and I love you. To my kids: Madison, Samantha, and Nick: Thank you for your patience, your humor, and your love. Thank you to Dr. Kevin King and Dr. Dan Mitchell. I greatly appreciate your mentorship and patience through this process. iii ABSTRACT The primary purpose of this thesis is to show that the doctrine of open theism denies the doctrine of inerrancy. Specifically open theism falsely interprets Scriptural references to God’s Divine omniscience and sovereignty, and conversely ignores the weighty Scriptural references to those two attributes which attribute perfection and completeness in a manner which open theism explicitly denies. While the doctrine of inerrancy has been hotly debated since the Enlightenment, and mostly so through the modern and postmodern eras, it may be argued that there has been a traditional understanding of the Bible’s inerrancy that is drawn from Scripture, and has been held since the early church fathers up to today’s conservative theologians. This view was codified in October, 1978 in the form of the Chicago Statement of Biblical Inerrancy.
    [Show full text]