DOCSLIB.ORG

Reconciling Universal Salvation and Freedom of Choice in Origen of Alexandria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Dissertations (1934 -) Projects Reconciling Universal Salvation and Freedom of Choice in Origen of Alexandria Lee W. Sytsma Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Sytsma, Lee W., "Reconciling Universal Salvation and Freedom of Choice in Origen of Alexandria" (2018). Dissertations (1934 -). 769. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/769 RECONCILING UNIVERSAL SALVATION AND FREEDOM OF CHOICE IN ORIGEN OF ALEXANDRIA by Lee W. Sytsma, B.A., M.T.S. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2018 ABSTRACT RECONCILING UNIVERSAL SALVATION AND FREEDOM OF CHOICE IN ORIGEN OF ALEXANDRIA Lee W. Sytsma, B.A., M.T.S. Marquette University, 2018 Origen has traditionally been famous for his universalism, but many scholars now express doubt that Origen believed in a universal and permanent apocatastasis. This is because many scholars are convinced that Origen’s teaching on moral autonomy (or freedom of choice) is logically incompatible with the notion that God foreordains every soul’s future destiny. Those few scholars who do argue that Origen believed in both moral autonomy and universal salvation either do not know how to reconcile these two views in Origen’s theology, or their proposed “solutions” are not convincing. In this dissertation I make two preliminary arguments which allow the question of logical compatibility to come into focus. First, I argue that vague phrases such as “free will” or “freedom of the will” are not helpful descriptions of Origen’s thought, but instead we must understand the careful and technical way Origen defined moral autonomy. Second, I make the argument that Origen did, in fact, believe in a universal and permanent restoration of all fallen souls (the apocatastasis), and that this restoration was predetermined and foreordained by God. These two arguments introduce the follow- up question: how does Origen think it is possible for God to achieve this predetermined outcome of cosmic history, an outcome completely facilitated through the free and contingent decisions of creatures, without God somehow coercing those who might choose to consistently resist him? My aim is to demonstrate that Origen reconciled his belief in universal salvation and moral autonomy by drawing upon his multi-layered understanding of God’s foreknowledge in order to show how God uses his foreknowledge in the planning of salvation-history. Careful analysis of key passages reveals Origen’s belief that God not only foreknows our future choices, but that God also knows what free choices creatures would make in any hypothetical situation. Therefore, I argue, Origen believed that God preselects and arranges into a future timeline only those free choices of creatures which God foresees would eventually result in a universal restoration. In this way God is able to infallibly bring about the foreordained apocatastasis without violating moral autonomy as Origen defined it. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Lee W. Sytsma, B.A., M.T.S. Writing these acknowledgements was one of the hardest, yet one of the most joyful aspects of my dissertation. It is a testament to the sort of people who have enabled and supported me throughout this project that I have thought more about what to write in this space than in any other page of my dissertation. First and foremost I wish to thank my director Dr. Michel Barnes who guided and mentored my writing in more ways than I can count. I will forever value the way he generously offered his expertise, his careful reading, and his patience for my shortcomings, just as I will forever value his friendship. I am also grateful to my committee members, Dr. Mickey Mattox, Dr. Michael Cover, and Rev. Aaron Pidel. Their meticulous reading and wise feedback significantly strengthened my project in its final stages. I am grateful to my friends who have sustained and encouraged me, and who are no doubt tired of hearing about how fascinating Origen is. My thanks go to Sarah Pritchard for her unexpected and profound generosity to my family. I am thankful for Mark Chapman who has been an ever-present source of wisdom and a dear friend. I would like to especially mention my close friend Jonathan Morgan. Jon supported and encouraged me at critical times during my project and I am forever grateful for his friendship. Additionally, I am grateful for the ways both Jon and Mark have modelled that rare class of scholar who joins together high-caliber scholarship with Christ-centered devotion. I admire them both deeply. ii Most of all I wish to express my deepest gratitude to my family. I thank my late grandparents for their Christ-like examples and their absolute devotion to me. They taught me to love theology and to question deeply. I thank my parents, Jim and Joy, and my siblings Nicole, Anthony and Katherine, along with all my wonderful in-laws on both sides of my family, for their unceasing support, their unconditional love, and their many prayers. My brother Anthony helped me in more ways than I can state here, and I owe him much. Anthony not only supported me as a faithful proofreader (along with his wife Sara), but he was a constant source of encouragement and refreshment. Furthermore, his unceasing devotion to Christ in the midst of life’s difficulties has been an example I aspire to. In a way that is hard to articulate, I am forever grateful to my children – Genevieve, Henry, and Will – for their patience and love. For years they were forced to share Dad’s attentions with a long-dead churchman. I cherish each of you and I look forward to reminding you of my gratitude when you are old enough to understand it. It is difficult to know how to adequately thank my wife and soul-mate Meghann. I am eternally grateful to you. Your self-sacrificial love continually takes my breath away. Your encouragement, your strength, and your love did not just make this dissertation possible, but it also made possible the many years leading up to this point. Not only have you been the bedrock of our family, but you have performed this role with grace and dignity. You have been Christ to our family, you are my best friend, and I admire you beyond any other. Without reservation I dedicate this book to you. Finally, I thank and praise God for all good things, for answering the prayers of my heart, and for calling me to serve him. Soli Deo Gloria! iii ABBREVIATIONS Series or Major Works ACW Ancient Christian Writers ANF Ante-Nicene Fathers FOTC Fathers of the Church GCS Die Griechischen Christlichen Schriftsteller OED Oxford English Dictionary PG Patrologia Graeca SBL Society of Biblical Literature SC Sources Chrétiennes Works of Origen Cels Contra Celsum ComCt Commentary on the Canticle of Canticles ComJn Commentary on John ComMatt Commentary on Matthew ComRm Commentary on Romans Dial Disputation with Heraclides EpistGreg Letter to Gregory Hom1R (1S) Homilies on 1 Kings (1 Samuel) HomEzek Homilies on Ezekiel HomGen Homilies on Genesis iv HomJer Homilies on Jeremiah HomJosh Homilies on Joshua HomNum Homilies on Numbers PArch First Principles (Peri archon / De principiis) PEuch On Prayer (Peri Euches) Phil The Philocalia v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................. i ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER ONE: STATE OF THE QUESTION ............................................................. 14 Status Quaestionis and Literature Review ..................................................................... 17 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 43 CHAPTER TWO: ORIGEN’S UNDERSTANDING OF MORAL AUTONOMY ........ 44 Part 1 – Origen’s Theological Opponents ..................................................................... 44 Origen's “Gnostic” Opponents ................................................................................... 44 Early Christian Predestinarians .................................................................................. 53 Origen's Hermeneutic: God's Fairness and Goodness ............................................... 64 Part 2 – Origen’s View of Moral Autonomy ................................................................. 66 Revelation and Philosophy: Origen's Dual Supports for Moral Autonomy ............... 66 Origen's General Anthropology: the “Tripartite Person” and the “Dual Nature” ...... 69 Greek Vocabulary and Expressions of Moral Autonomy .......................................... 79 Epictetus vs. Alexander of Aphrodisias ..................................................................... 82 Origen Adopts the Stoic Model of Impression and Assent ........................................ 88 Origen's Alterations to the Stoic Model: 1) Tripartite Anthropology ........................ 92 Origen's Alterations to the Stoic Model: 2) Greater Potential for Moral Progress .... 97 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Philosophical Issues with Existence of God

    Philosophical Issues with Existence of God

    Philosophical issues with existence of God www.rationalhumor.com R.N Session Schedule Session # Date / Time Session Name Brief Description 1 Jan 24th – Sunday General Concepts & History of Understand what are the various belief systems. 2:00pm to 4:00pm Philosophy Historical Review of how Philosophy evolved 2 Jan 31stth – Sunday General Philosophy an Introduction General Introduction into what is the branch of 2:00pm to 4:00pm Philosophy and then specifically review religious philosophy 3 Feb 7th – Sunday Philosophyof Religion How philosophyis handled and presented in the 2:00pm to 4:00pm various MAJOR religions – Abrahaministic & Eastern 4 Feb 14th – Sunday Logic & Logical Fallacies Understanding Logic and understanding how to 2:00pm to 4:00pm identify fallacies in arguments 5 Feb 21st – Sunday Arguments for the Existence of God Theological arguments; Ontological Arguments and 2:00pm to 4:00pm Teleological Arguments for the Existence of God 6 Feb 28th – Sunday Philosophical issues with existence of Philosophical issues with existence – Boeing 747 2:00pm to 4:00pm God Gambit; Russell’s TeaPot; Morality etc. 7 March 7th - Sunday Free Will and Theodicy Theproblem of Free Will with respect to 2:00pm to 4:00pm Omnipotence; Omniscience and Omni benevolence. Problem with Evil 8 March 14th – Sunday Putting it all together Summarizingkey concepts 2:00pm to 4:00pm www.rationalhumor.com R.N Background Information a) Free Will - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAqFbiBDb _c b) Eastern Religions - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3w5ZUs7 ayI c) Belief - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pOI2YvV uuE Arguments against the existence of God Type Empirical Arguments • Inconsistent revelations from various faiths.
  • Harmonising God's Sovereignty and Man's Free Will

    Harmonising God's Sovereignty and Man's Free Will

    Introduction Historical Overview Arminianism & Calvinism Molinism Criticisms Conclusion An Introduction to Molinism Harmonising God’s Sovereignty and Man’s Free Will Wessel Venter http://www.siyach.org/ 2016-06-07 Introduction Historical Overview Arminianism & Calvinism Molinism Criticisms Conclusion Introduction Introduction Historical Overview Arminianism & Calvinism Molinism Criticisms Conclusion Mysteries of the Christian Faith 1. How can God be One, but Three Persons? 2. How can Jesus simultaneously be fully man and fully God? 3. How can God be sovereign over our lives, yet people still have free will? Introduction Historical Overview Arminianism & Calvinism Molinism Criticisms Conclusion Mysteries of the Christian Faith 1. How can God be One, but Three Persons? 2. How can Jesus simultaneously be fully man and fully God? 3. How can God be sovereign over our lives, yet people still have free will? Introduction Historical Overview Arminianism & Calvinism Molinism Criticisms Conclusion Table of Contents 4 Molinism 1 Introduction Definition of Molinism Preliminary Definitions Counterfactuals 2 Historical Overview Middle Knowledge Pelagian Controversy 5 Objections and Criticisms Thomas Aquinas Miscellaneous The Reformation Thinly Veiled Open Theism The Counter-Reformation The Truth/Existence of Further History CCFs Secular Debate Divine Voodoo Worlds 3 Arminianism and Calvinism Grounding Problem Arminianism Not Biblical Calvinism 6 Applications and Conclusion Arminianism vs Calvinism Applications Introduction Historical Overview Arminianism & Calvinism Molinism Criticisms Conclusion Definitions Preliminary DefinitionsI Definition (Soteriology[9]) “The study of salvation.” In Christianity this includes topics such as regeneration, election, predestination, repentance, sanctification, justification, glorification, etc. Definition (Possible World) A world that could have been, if history had progressed differently. E.g., if there was not a traffic jam, I would not have been late for work on Monday.
  • John Ford Wilson UNISA Student Number

    John Ford Wilson UNISA Student Number

    John Ford Wilson UNISA Student Number: 4593-816-4 275 Elkins Lake Huntsville, Texas 77340 USA 1-713-202-8953 [email protected] Approved Thesis Title: Examination of the Work of John C. Polkinghorne Praeparatio Evangelii Supervisor: Professor William J. Abraham Co-supervisor: Professor Vaughn Willard Baker Date of Submission of Thesis: i Curriculum Vitae John Ford Wilson Curriculum Vitae EDUCATION Ph.D. Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas M.S. Physics, Drexel Institute of Technology, Philadelphia, Pa. M.S. Theological Studies, Perkins School of Theology at Southern Methodist University M.S. Industrial Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. B.S. Electrical Engineering, University of Tennessee. EXPERIENCE Lecturer, Department of Physics, Sam Houston State University; Huntsville, Texas Member The Institute on Religion in an Age of Science Fellow, Center of Faith and Culture at University of St. Thomas; Houston, Texas Adjunct Faculty for Institute for Spirituality and Health, Houston, Texas Associate Pastor for Evangelism, St. Luke’s United Methodist Church; Houston, Texas Ordained Deacon in Texas Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church Research Assistant Professor of Physics and Director of Educational Outreach, University of Houston; Houston, Texas Professor of Physics Houston Community College System; Houston, Texas Adjunct Professor of Physics University of St. Thomas; Houston, Texas Wilson and Associates: Self-employed as consultant in Houston, Tx. for marketing, business and strategic planning, and investment management. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. Marketing Division, DuPont Textile Fibers Dept: Technical Service Manager for Reemay® and Typar®. Marketing Manager for Reemay®, Typar®, and Sontara®. Strategy and Development Assistant for Nomex® fiber and paper; responsible for business plans, earnings, and forecast.
  • Issues with Christian Universalismv2

    Issues with Christian Universalismv2

    Main Issues with Christian Universalism Topical Resource and Research 05/12/2013 Fellowship Church, Knoxville, TN Quick Hits Christian Universalism differs from Traditional Universalism in that Traditional Universalism (TU) says that all religions are equal and that all people will be saved regardless of beliefs. Christian Universalism (Christian Universalism) says that all will be saved, but through Christ. All people will come to worship and adore Christ. This will happen during an almost “Purgatory” state where people will be held until they come to confess Christ. This keeps Christ center. This view can also be called “Ultimate Reconciliation.” Tentmaker.org is a website that many who hold this view reference and use to find “scholarly” articles (some articles are written by scholars and some are not) and sources. One of the tenents espoused by Tentmaker, et al, is that Scriptures have been mistranslated or that early traditions aren’t correctly viewed. Defending a traditional view against such presuppositions can be difficult. 1 Main Issues There are two main points that need to be addressed, as they are the ones that the majority of the questions will come from. 1) The Greek word aion. This Greek word is used for the word “eternal” and “forever” in the New Testament. One of the main claims that the proponents of Christian Universalism make is that the word, from which we get our word “eon,” is mistranslated and means “an age.” In this, there is a sliver of truth. Aion is used in different ways in the New Testament and is a word that has no real English equivalent.
  • The Eucharist Sacrifice and the Changing Utopian Moment in Post

    The Eucharist Sacrifice and the Changing Utopian Moment in Post

    The Eucharist Sacrifice and the Moment Changing Utopian in Post Reformation Christianity ADAM SELIGMAN The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel ABSTRACT In this study, the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century, and especially English Puritanism, is analyzed in terms of the transformation of the soteriological doctrines of Christianity. This transformation, in turn, is seen as crucial to a restructuring of utopian themes in Christian civilization. Based on the restructuring of models of social authority and of Christian community, a new vision of the ideal social order was posited. The uto- pian visions posited by these changes and the contradictions inherent in them are viewed as central to the emergence of modern notions of political and social praxes. Introduction IN THIS STUDY, it will be argued that the major assumptions under- lying Christian utopian visions and their realization were radically transformed in the period of the Protestant Reformation. Indeed, the Refor- mation and, more specifically, its Calvinist variants, will be presented as con- taining a salient utopian or millennial moment-with lasting importance for the structuring of modern social life. In pursuing this line of inquiry, we are in fact following on the thought of Max Weber, who saw in the 'inner-worldliness' of ascetic Protestantism one of the fundamental components of the modern world order (Weber, 1958; Schluchter, 1979; Eisenstadt, 1968, 1988). The present study will explore the role of ascetic Protestantism in fundamentally restructuring one of the major and defining components of the Western Christian tradition. The transforma- tion effected by ascetic Protestantism in the utopian models and modes of millennial action within the Western Christian tradition was, it is argued, a crucial aspect in the development of the modern socio-political order.
  • Doctrinal Controversies of the Carolingian Renaissance: Gottschalk of Orbais’ Teachings on Predestination*

    Doctrinal Controversies of the Carolingian Renaissance: Gottschalk of Orbais’ Teachings on Predestination*

    ROCZNIKI FILOZOFICZNE Tom LXV, numer 3 – 2017 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rf.2017.65.3-3 ANDRZEJ P. STEFAŃCZYK * DOCTRINAL CONTROVERSIES OF THE CAROLINGIAN RENAISSANCE: GOTTSCHALK OF ORBAIS’ TEACHINGS ON PREDESTINATION* This paper is intended to outline the main areas of controversy in the dispute over predestination in the 9th century, which shook up or electrified the whole world of contemporary Western Christianity and was the most se- rious doctrinal crisis since Christian antiquity. In the first part I will sketch out the consequences of the writings of St. Augustine and the revival of sci- entific life and theological and philosophical reflection, which resulted in the emergence of new solutions and aporias in Christian doctrine—the dispute over the Eucharist and the controversy about trina deitas. In the second part, which constitutes the main body of the article, I will focus on the presenta- tion of four sources of controversies in the dispute over predestination, whose inventor and proponent was Gottschalk of Orbais, namely: (i) the concept of God, (ii) the meaning of grace, nature and free will, (iii) the rela- tion of foreknowledge to predestination, and (iv) the doctrine of redemption, i.e., in particular, the relation of justice to mercy. The article is mainly an attempt at an interpretation of the texts of the epoch, mainly by Gottschalk of Orbais1 and his adversary, Hincmar of Reims.2 I will point out the dif- Dr ANDRZEJ P. STEFAŃCZYK — Katedra Historii Filozofii Starożytnej i Średniowiecznej, Wy- dział Filozofii Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II; adres do korespondencji: Al.
  • Jesus and His Teachings

    Jesus and His Teachings

    Jesus and His Teachings Jesus and His Teachings Subject Area: World History Time Required: 1 class session General Topics: Origins of Christianity in the Roman world, ancient Judaism, important individuals in Classical Mediterranean societies, religious views in Classical Mediterranean societies Average Grade Level from Readable.io: 10.3 SUMMARY This lesson on Jesus and his teachings focuses on two biblical texts, the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew and the Sermon on the Plain in the Gospel of Luke. It asks students to consider the historical context of the two sermons, the influence of Hellenistic Judaism on the authors of the two Gospels, and the challenges of using such literature to reconstruct history. To get the students started engaging with the texts, the lesson asks students to compare two artistic depictions of the sermons. It then moves to a close reading of both sermons using a guided reading graphic organizer and a resource developed by Advanced Placement called a SOAPStone graphic organizer. Using these tools to engage with the sermons will sharpen students’ critical reading skills as well as give them methods they can use when they read other demanding texts. Coming from two of the earliest accounts of Jesus’ teachings, these passages stem from a time when Hellenistic Judaism and nascent Christianity were both shaping portrayals of Jesus. Hence, the lesson includes resources to help students analyze how each sermon reflects its ancient cultural context and to consider the larger question of how scholars arrive at interpretive and historical conclusions when they have limited sources from which to draw.
  • Eternal Damnation in the Fragments of Clement of Alexandria? Daniel J

    Eternal Damnation in the Fragments of Clement of Alexandria? Daniel J

    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Students 2017 The yT ranny of Authority: Eternal Damnation in the Fragments of Clement of Alexandria? Daniel J. Crosby Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/gsas_pubs Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Citation Crosby, Daniel J., "The yT ranny of Authority: Eternal Damnation in the Fragments of Clement of Alexandria?" (2017). Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. 4. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/gsas_pubs/4 This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/gsas_pubs/4 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Tyranny of Authority: Eternal Damnation in the Fragments of Clement of Alexandria? In the year 1715, John Potter published the most comprehensive edition of the extant writings of the Clement of Alexandria, the second-century Church Father who is most famous for his apologetic Protrepticus and intensely philosophical Stromata. Potter’s edition includes a collection of fragments, and among these fragments, this one is conspicuous: Ἀθάνατοι πᾶσαι αἱ ψυχαὶ, καὶ τῶν ἀσεβῶν, αἷς ἄμεινον ἦν μὴ ἀφθάρτους εἶναι. Κολαζόμεναι γὰρ ὑπὸ τοῦ ἀσβέτου πυρὸς ἀπεράντῳ τιμωρίᾳ καὶ μὴ θνήσκουσαι, ἐπὶ κακῷ τῷ ἑαυτῶν τέλος λαβεῖν οὐκ ἔχουσιν.1 All souls are immortal, even those of the wicked, for whom it is better that they were not deathless.
  • Christian Universalism in the Novels of Denise Giardina William Jolliff George Fox University, Wjolliff@Georgefox.Edu

    Christian Universalism in the Novels of Denise Giardina William Jolliff George Fox University, [email protected]

    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Faculty Publications - Department of English Department of English 2016 The ideW Reach of Salvation: Christian Universalism in the Novels of Denise Giardina William Jolliff George Fox University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/eng_fac Recommended Citation Jolliff, William, "The ideW Reach of Salvation: Christian Universalism in the Novels of Denise Giardina" (2016). Faculty Publications - Department of English. 28. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/eng_fac/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of English at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications - Department of English by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wide Reach of Salvation: Christian Universalism in the Novels of Denise Giardina William Jolliff It would be careless and reductive to refer to Denise Giardina as a regionalist; she is simply someone paying attention to her life. - W. Dale Brown Maybe Denise Giardina has written too well about Appalachia. Storming Heaven (1987) and The Unquiet Earth (1992), the two novels set in the West Virginia coalfields of the author's childhood, have received serious critical attention: but with few exceptions, her other novels have been ignored by academic commentators. Had Giardina written with such perfect and articulate craft about Dublin or London or New York, critics might be slower to think of her simply as a regionalist or even a writer of place. And I suspect she would have less trouble being heard when she says, as she has many times, "As much as I'm an Appalachian writer, I get called a political writer, but the label that is most appropriate for my writing is theological writing" (Douglass 34).
  • Anachronism in Early French Futuristic Fiction

    Anachronism in Early French Futuristic Fiction

    DePauw University Scholarly and Creative Work from DePauw University Modern Languages Faculty publications Modern Languages 7-2016 Anachronism in Early French Futuristic Fiction Arthur B. Evans DePauw University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.depauw.edu/mlang_facpubs Part of the French and Francophone Literature Commons Recommended Citation Evans, Arthur B. "Anachronism in Early French Futuristic Fiction." Science Fiction Studies Vol. 43, no. 2, #129 (July 2016), pp. 194-206. Print. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Modern Languages at Scholarly and Creative Work from DePauw University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Modern Languages Faculty publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarly and Creative Work from DePauw University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 194 SCIENCE FICTION STUDIES, VOLUME 43 (2016) Arthur B. Evans Anachronism in Early French Futuristic Fiction Pawe³ Frelik, in his essay “The Future of the Past: Science Fiction, Retro, and Retrofuturism” (2013), defined the idea of retrofuturism as referring “to the text’s vision of the future, which comes across as anachronistic in relation to contemporary ways of imagining it” (208). Pawe³’s use of the word “anachronistic” in this definition set me to thinking. Aren’t all fictional portrayals of the future always and inevitably anachronistic in some way? Further, I saw in the phrase “contemporary ways of imagining” a delightful ambiguity between two different groups of readers: those of today who, viewing it in retrospect, see such a speculative text as an artifact, an inaccurate vision of the future from the past, but also the original readers, contemporary to the text when it was written, who no doubt saw it as a potentially real future that was chock-full of anachronisms in relation to their own time—but that one day might no longer be.
  • Universal Salvation and the Problem of Hell John R

    Universal Salvation and the Problem of Hell John R

    Theological Studies 52 (1991) CURRENT ESCHATOLOGY: UNIVERSAL SALVATION AND THE PROBLEM OF HELL JOHN R. SACHS, S.J. Weston School of Theology, Cambridge, Mass. HE PURPOSE of this article is to take a fresh look at the ancient and Tmuch misunderstood theme of apocatastasis. Increasing contempo­ rary use of the apocalyptic language of hell, hand in hand with the alarming appeal and growth of fundamentalism, sectarianism, and inte- gralism, suggest the urgency of this endeavor. After first surveying the checkered history of this theme from biblical times to the present, I will, second, state and describe the central points of current Catholic theology on these issues. It manifests a remarkable degree of consensus. Third, I shall turn more closely to the highly original thought of Hans Urs von Balthasar, whose approach seems most challenging. Fourth, I shall raise a question concerning the ability of human freedom to reject God defin­ itively. Finally, my conclusion will stress how a properly understood Christian universalism is not only consonant with several central strands of Christian belief, but is also profoundly relevant to the religious and cultural developments of the present age. THE DOCTRINE OF APOCATASTASIS The doctrine of apocatastasis, commonly attributed to Origen, main­ tained that the entire creation, including sinners, the damned, and the devil, would finally be restored to a condition of eternal happiness and salvation. This was an important theme in early Christian eschatology.1 Even before the Christian era, of course, the idea of an apokatastasis paritàri was well known in ancient religion and philosophy. In Eastern thought especially, one finds a predominantly cyclical conception of time and history according to which the end always involves a return to the 1 See, for example, Brian E.
  • Christian Theology Edited by Ian A

    Christian Theology Edited by Ian A

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-41496-9 - The Cambridge Dictionary of Christian Theology Edited by Ian A. McFarland, David A. S. Fergusson, Karen Kilby, Iain R. Torrance Frontmatter More information the cambridge dictionary of Christian Theology With over 550 entries ranging from ‘Abba’ to ‘Zwingli’ composed by leading contemporary theologians from around the world, The Cambridge Dictionary of Christian Theology represents a fresh, ecumenical approach to theological refer- ence. Written with an emphasis on clarity and concision, all entries are designed to help the reader understand and assess the specifically theological significance of the most important concepts. Clearly structured, the volume is organized around a small number of ‘core entries’ which focus on key topics to provide a general overview of major subject areas, while making use of related shorter entries to impart a more detailed knowledge of technical terms. The work as a whole provides an introduction to the defining topics in Christian thought and is an essential reference point for students and scholars. ian a. mcfarland is Associate Professor of Systematic Theology at Emory University. His publications include Difference and Identity: A Theological Anthro- pology (2001) and The Divine Image: Envisioning the Invisible God (2005). davida.s.fergussonis Professor of Divinity and Principal of New College at the University of Edinburgh. His recent publications include Church, State and Civil Society (Cambridge, 2004) and Faith and Its Critics (2009). karen kilby is Head of the Department of Theology and Religious Studies at the University of Nottingham and President of the Catholic Theological Associ- ation of Great Britain. She is the author of A Brief Introduction to Karl Rahner (2007) and Karl Rahner: Theology and Philosophy (2004).