A Nietzschean Critique of Interpretations Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Nietzschean Critique of Interpretations Of THE AFFIRMATION OF BLINDNESS: A NIETZSCHEAN CRITIQUE OF INTERPRETATIONS OF SUFFERING FROM DISABILITY A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Caleb A. Berkemeier August 2021 © Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation written by Caleb A. Berkemeier B.A., Mount Vernon Nazarene University, 2009 M.A., Kent State University, 2012 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2021 Approved by Sara Newman_____________, Co-chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Tammy Clewell_____________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Wesley Raabe______________, Deborah Barnbaum_________, Anthony Fernandez_________, Accepted by Babacar M’Baye___________, Chair, Department of English Mandy Munro-Stasiuk_______, Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iii ABBREVIATIONS OF NIETZSCHE’S WORKS----------------------------------------------------- vi EPIGRAPH---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------vii CHAPTERS I. Introduction 1. The Problem of Suffering from Disability--------------------------------------------1 2. The Affirmation of Blindness----------------------------------------------------------7 3. A Note on Terminology----------------------------------------------------------------14 Part I. Disability and the Meaning of Suffering II. Disability Studies and the Meaning of Suffering 1. Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------------19 2. Michael Oliver and Suffering from Oppression------------------------------------20 3. Tobin Siebers and Suffering from Ideology-----------------------------------------26 4. Susan Wendell and Suffering for Difference---------------------------------------34 5. Conclusion-------------------------------------------------------------------------------40 III. Disability and the Problem of Suffering 1. Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------------42 2. Suffering Defined-----------------------------------------------------------------------44 3. Suffering and Value--------------------------------------------------------------------50 4. A Nietzschean Interpretation of Suffering-------------------------------------------60 5. Suffering and Power--------------------------------------------------------------------68 6. Conclusion-------------------------------------------------------------------------------76 IV. The Ideological Interpretation of Suffering iii 1. Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------------80 2. Theories of Ideology as Theodicies--------------------------------------------------81 3. Is the Ideology-of-Ability Theory “True?” -----------------------------------------86 4. The Ideology-of-Cure Theory---------------------------------------------------------96 5. Conclusion-----------------------------------------------------------------------------108 Part II. Blindness and Suffering V. Three Interpretations of Blindness 1. Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------112 2. Kenneth Jernigan and the National Federation of the Blind---------------------115 3. A Deflationary Interpretation of Blindness----------------------------------------122 4. A Religious Interpretation of Blindness--------------------------------------------129 5. An Affirmative Interpretation of Blindness----------------------------------------139 6. Conclusion-----------------------------------------------------------------------------147 VI. Ressentiment, Bad Conscience, and the Oppression Narrative 1. Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------151 2. Ressentiment---------------------------------------------------------------------------153 3. Imaginary Compensation for Powerlessness--------------------------------------161 4. Ressentiment and Imaginary Compensation in Georgina Kleege’s Blind Rage- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------167 5. Internalized Ableism and Bad Conscience-----------------------------------------175 6. Conclusion-----------------------------------------------------------------------------182 VII. The Affirmation of Blindness in Literature 1. Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------185 iv 2. Blindness and Power in Sophocles’ Oedipus Cycle------------------------------193 3. Blindness and Power in Milton’s Samson Agonistes-----------------------------207 4. Conclusion-----------------------------------------------------------------------------217 VIII. Conclusion-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------219 WORKS CITED--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------224 v Abbreviations of Nietzsche’s Works A – The Anti-Christ BGE – Beyond Good and Evil D - Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality EH – Ecce Homo GM – On the Genealogy of Morality GS – The Gay Science HAH – Human, All Too Human NCW – Nietzsche Contra Wagner NUL – Nietzsche Unpublished Letters TI – Twilight of the Idols Z – Thus Spoke Zarathustra WP – The Will to Power vi I have often asked myself whether I am not more heavily obligated to the hardest years of my life than to any others. As my inmost nature teaches me, whatever is necessary—as seen from the heights and in the sense of a great economy—is also the useful par excellence: one should not only bear it, one should love it. Amor fati: that is my inmost nature. And as for my long sickness, do I not owe it indescribably more than I owe to my health? I owe it a higher health—one which is made stronger by whatever does not kill it. I also owe my philosophy to it. Only great pain is the ultimate liberator of the spirit, as the teacher of great suspicion which turns every U into an X, a real, genuine X, that is, the letter before the penultimate one. Only great pain, that long, slow pain in which we are burned with green wood, as it were—pain which takes its time—only this forces us philosophers to descend into our ultimate depths and to put away all trust, all good- naturedness, all that would veil, all mildness, all that is medium— things in which formerly we may have found our humanity. I doubt that such a pain makes us “better,” but I know that it makes us more profound. —Friedrich Nietzsche, NCW “Epilogue” vii Chapter I. Introduction 1. The Problem of Suffering from Disability In their chapter in the Disability and Social Theory reader, Tanya Titchkosky and Rod Michalko challenge “the hegemonic taken-for-granted character of the disability-as-a-problem frame” (127). What they mean is that the disabled body is automatically and unreflectively interpreted as a problem because it deviates from a presupposed “natural” or “normal” body. Thus, in every domain of social life—e.g., science, education, medicine, employment, rehabilitation, politics, etc.—disability is approached as something to be normalized. Scientists, doctors, and rehabilitation specialists attempt to mitigate or eliminate the problem of disability through treatments and cures. Educators and human resources professionals attempt to normalize disability through accommodation strategies and technologies. Politicians and political activists seek to integrate disability into mainstream socioeconomic life through civil rights legislation. All of these efforts certainly have practical value, and we would not want to live in a world in which people did not pursue these goals. However, for Titchkosky and Michalko, automatically interpreting disability as a problem in need of a solution precludes the possibility that disability may have its own value. As they put it, from the disability-as-problem perspective, “[disability] may participate in normalcy, but it can never be normal, let alone be valuable, enjoyable or necessary” (128). 1 The notion that disability could be valuable, enjoyable, or necessary strikes at the heart of the common-sense perspective about disability that we find in mainstream social and cultural life. But it resonates well with perspectives that come out of the disability rights movement (DRM), and out of Disability Studies (DS)—the academic and theory-driven wing of the DRM. From these quarters, we are told that the real disability problem is how people with impairments are discriminated against, marginalized, excluded from participation in social life, and rendered disabled by structural and attitudinal barriers. Such people are not primarily disabled by their bodies; they are disabled within social contexts and physical environments that have been constructed, intentionally and unintentionally, to exclude them. Thus, disability is imposed on impaired people by an oppressive social structure that is maintained by the non-disabled. Disability is an identity to be reclaimed from non-disabled oppressors, a weapon to be used for critiquing ableism and other harmful ideologies, a form of life that is valuable specifically because it is different, and/or an identity of which to be proud. Most DS theorists share the view that “common sense” ideas about suffering from disability are misleading and harmful stereotypes. In Part 1 of this dissertation, I focus on four such theorists—Tobin Siebers, Michael Oliver, Susan Wendell,
Recommended publications
  • The George-Anne Student Media
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern The George-Anne Student Media 6-5-2008 The George-Anne Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/george-anne Part of the Higher Education Commons Recommended Citation "The George-Anne" (2008). The George-Anne. 2082. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/george-anne/2082 This newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Media at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in The George-Anne by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The George-Anne Daily • Serving Georgia Southern University and the Statesboro Community Since 1927 • Questions? Call 912-681-5246 GEORGE- THURSDAY, JUNE 5,2008 • VOLUME 81 • ISSUE 23 COVERING THE CAMPUS LIKE A SWARM OF GNATS FEATURES PRESIDENT OBAMA? By Claire Gallam News Editor The democratic primaries are over and the party has chosen their representative. Senator Barack Obama was named the nominee for the Special Photo democratic party Tuesday, making him the first African American ever to head a major political WEEZER FANS SEE RED party. Geek rock pioneers Weezer The first-term senator captured the Democratic return with album number nomination by beating out Sen. Hillary Clinto and six, another self-titled effort there is still talk around Washingtonaboutwhether nicknamed "The Red Album." or not she will be a VP candidate for Obama. Page 11 According to CNN, Obama and Clinton traveled nationwide participating in more than NEWS 26 debates, which brought with them nearly 35 million supporters to the polls.
    [Show full text]
  • Reason and Belief in God in the Nietzschean Postmodern Philosophy: a Critical Study in the Light of Thomistic Philosophy
    Reason and Belief in God in the Nietzschean Postmodern Philosophy: A Critical Study in the Light of Thomistic Philosophy A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Award of the Degree of Master of Philosophy in Philosophy by PRINCE D. (Reg. No. 1234802) Under the Guidance of Jose Nandhikkara Professor and Head of the Department of Philosophy Department of Philosophy ProperCHRISTty of Ch rUNIVERSITYist University. BANGALORE, INDIA Use it for fair purpose. Give credit to theMarch autho r2013 by c iting properly, if your are using it. Approval of Dissertation Dissertation entitled ‘Reason and Belief in God in the Nietzschean Postmodern Philosophy: A Critical Study in the Light of Thomistic Philosophy’ by Prince D. Reg. No. 1234802 is approved for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy in Philosophy. Examiners: 1. ___________________ ___________________ 2. ___________________ ___________________ 3. ___________________ ___________________ Supervisor(s): ___________________ ___________________ Chairman: ___________________ ___________________ Date: ___________ (Seal) Place: Christ University Property of Christ University. Use it for fair purpose. Give credit to the autho r by citing properly, if your are using it. i Declaration I, Prince D., hereby declare that the dissertation, titled ‘Reason and Belief in God in the Nietzschean Postmodern Philosophy: A Critical Study in the Light of Thomistic Philosophy’ is a record of original research work undertaken by me for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy in Philosophy. I have completed this study under the supervision of Dr. Jose Nandhikkara, Professor and Head of the Department of Philosophy. I also declare that this dissertation has not been submitted for the award of any degree, diploma, associateship fellowship or other title.
    [Show full text]
  • Newton Contra Alt-Right Nietzsche: Dionysus As Androgynous Black Panther
    Newton contra Alt-right Nietzsche: Dionysus as Androgynous Black Panther Joshua M. Hall The Pluralist, Volume 15, Number 2, Summer 2020, pp. 110-128 (Article) Published by University of Illinois Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/757907 [ Access provided at 12 Oct 2020 22:27 GMT from Loyola-Notre Dame Library ] Newton contra Alt-right Nietzsche: Dionysus as Androgynous Black Panther joshua m. hall William Paterson University I saw a man move catlike Across the rooftops, Glide along the horizons, Casting no shadow . —Melvin Newton (qtd. in Hilliard and Weise 245)1 perhaps the most egregious subcommunity responsible for today’s political crisis in the United States, pre-dating and facilitating the rise of its forty-fifth president, is the group known as the “alt-right” (short for the al- ternative right of the political spectrum). It is composed primarily of younger (millennial) cisgender white men, and it developed in response to a well- publicized controversy in the world of computer gaming known as “Gamer- gate.”2 And one of their primary philosophical influences, like the Nazis before them, is Friedrich Nietzsche. They interpret Nietzsche, often through the filter of Ayn Rand’s work, as a powerful precursor to their self-appointed role as nemeses of “political correctness” and champions of the hierarchical views embraced by capitalists, racists, sexists, xenophobes, and so on (which they mask as “free speech”). One major aspect of the mainstream right to which the alt-right is “al- ternative” is orthodox Christianity. Many on the alt-right proudly identify as atheists or agnostics and, like Nietzsche, reach conclusions highly criti- cal of democracy, women, Jewish people, and so on, that are shared by the mainstream right, but they do so via routes that do not explicitly endorse any religious beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • ENDER's GAME by Orson Scott Card Chapter 1 -- Third
    ENDER'S GAME by Orson Scott Card Chapter 1 -- Third "I've watched through his eyes, I've listened through his ears, and tell you he's the one. Or at least as close as we're going to get." "That's what you said about the brother." "The brother tested out impossible. For other reasons. Nothing to do with his ability." "Same with the sister. And there are doubts about him. He's too malleable. Too willing to submerge himself in someone else's will." "Not if the other person is his enemy." "So what do we do? Surround him with enemies all the time?" "If we have to." "I thought you said you liked this kid." "If the buggers get him, they'll make me look like his favorite uncle." "All right. We're saving the world, after all. Take him." *** The monitor lady smiled very nicely and tousled his hair and said, "Andrew, I suppose by now you're just absolutely sick of having that horrid monitor. Well, I have good news for you. That monitor is going to come out today. We're going to just take it right out, and it won't hurt a bit." Ender nodded. It was a lie, of course, that it wouldn't hurt a bit. But since adults always said it when it was going to hurt, he could count on that statement as an accurate prediction of the future. Sometimes lies were more dependable than the truth. "So if you'll just come over here, Andrew, just sit right up here on the examining table.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (364Kb)
    Jesson, Stuart ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8826-0314 (2019) ‘The question in each and every thing’: Nietzsche and Weil on affirmation. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 86 (2). pp. 131-155. Downloaded from: http://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/3727/ The version presented here may differ from the published version or version of record. If you intend to cite from the work you are advised to consult the publisher's version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11153-019-09703-4 Research at York St John (RaY) is an institutional repository. It supports the principles of open access by making the research outputs of the University available in digital form. Copyright of the items stored in RaY reside with the authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full text items free of charge, and may download a copy for private study or non-commercial research. For further reuse terms, see licence terms governing individual outputs. Institutional Repository Policy Statement RaY Research at the University of York St John For more information please contact RaY at [email protected] “This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Jesson, Stuart (2019) ‘The question in each and every thing’: Nietzsche and Weil on affirmation is available online at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11153-019- 09703-4” ‘The question in each and every thing’: Nietzsche and Weil on affirmation1 Abstract: This paper identifies and offers commentary upon a previously un-remarked consonance between Nietzsche and Weil when it comes to the idea of a universal love of the world (‘affirmation’ in Nietzsche’s terms, or ‘consent to necessity’ in Weil’s).
    [Show full text]
  • Music Collection
    collection! 2573 songs, 6:19:50:59 total time, 9.72 GB Artist Album # Songs Total Time The Arcade Fire 2001 Demos 10 51:06 Arcade Fire EP 7 32:52 Funeral 14 1:06:04 The Arcade Fire/David Bowie Live EP 3 14:28 Audioslave Audioslave 9 39:54 Out of Exile 16 1:10:20 The Beatles A Hard Day's Night 13 30:30 Abbey Road 17 47:22 Alternate Abbey Road 7 25:44 Beatles For Sale 14 34:13 Help 15 37:30 Let It Be 10 28:15 Magical Mystery Tour 10 32:51 Past Masters - Volume One 18 42:28 Past Masters - Volume Two 13 40:02 Please Please Me 13 30:23 Revolver 13 32:19 Rubber Soul 14 35:48 Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band 13 39:50 The White Album CD1 17 46:21 The White Album CD2 14 54:17 With The Beatles 14 33:24 Yellow Submarine 13 40:07 Bob Dylan Blood On The Tracks 10 51:53 Bob Dylan 14 41:07 Highway 61 Revisited 8 45:24 Love And Theft 8 36:34 Nashville 1 2:17 Shot of Love 10 44:55 The Best of Bob Dylan 6 31:31 The Essential Bob Dylan 26 1:47:02 The Freewheeling Bob Dylan 13 50:07 The Rolling Thunder Revue CD1 11 51:02 The Rolling Thunder Revue CD2 11 51:12 Bob Dylan/Johnny Cash Nashville 20 59:45 Buffalo Springfield Retrospective: The Best of Buffalo Springfield 12 40:21 The Cardigans First Band on the Moon 11 39:06 Life 14 48:07 Super Extra Gravity 14 47:57 Clap Your Hands Say Yeah Clap Your Hands Say Yeah 12 38:41 Coldplay A Rush of Blood To The Head 12 58:47 Live 2003 14 1:17:35 Live at Glastonbury 2005 15 1:17:26 Parachutes 10 35:51 X&Y 14 1:05:53 Danny Elfman Big Fish OST 22 57:39 Dave Matthews Band Before These Crowed Streets 11 1:10:21 Busted
    [Show full text]
  • Hogan Development Survey Manual
    Hogan Development Survey Manual Second Edition Robert Hogan, Ph.D. Joyce Hogan, Ph.D. Hogan Assessment Systems Tulsa, OK 74114, USA 2009 © Hogan Assessment Systems 2009 Robert Hogan, Ph.D. Joyce Hogan, Ph.D. No part of this work may be copied or transferred to any other form or expression without the expressed written consent from Hogan Assessment Systems, Inc. Hogan Personality Inventory ™ Hogan Development Survey ™ Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory ™ are the exclusive registered trademarks of Hogan Assessment Systems, Inc. www.hoganpress.com First printing 05-09 ISBN 978-0-9816457-7-3 CONTENTS Contents 1. Conceptual Background 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 The Problem 1 1.3 The Theoretical Context: Socioanalytic Theory and Organizational Dynamics 2 1.4 The Nature of Dysfunctional Dispositions 3 1.5 Development Guidelines 6 2. Inventory Construction, Reliability, and Structural Psychometrics 9 2.1 Development 9 2.2 Definitions of the Scales 13 2.3 Item Composition of the Scales 14 2.4 The 2008 US Normative Sample Dataset 14 2.4.1 Selection Versus Development Group Comparability Analysis 15 2.4.2 HDS Scale Score Mean Differences between the Development and Selection Groups 15 2.4.3 HDS Coefficient Alpha Reliabilities for the Development and Selection Groups 16 2.4.4 Correlation Pattern Hypothesis Test – Comparing Development and Selection Group Correlation Matrices 17 2.4.5 Comparison of Development and Selection Group Component Factor Analysis Solutions 18 2.4.6 Comparison of Development and Selection Group Nonmetric Smallest Space Analysis Solutions 19 2.4.7 Summary 21 2.5 Structural Psychometrics of the Normative Dataset (N = 109,103) 21 2.6 Descriptive Statistics and Reliabilities for the 2008 Normative Dataset (N =109,103) 22 2.7 Test-Retest Reliability 25 2.7.1 Short-Term Stability (less than 3 months) 25 2.7.2 Long-Term Stability (between 9 to 12 months) 25 3.
    [Show full text]
  • I Like Fruits and Veggies I Eat ‘Em Everyday to Keep My Body Healthy So I Can Learn and Play (Repeat)
    1 Shine ‘Em Up! Words and Music by Terry Lupton & Steve Shepherd Performed by Keely Hawks with the Shepherd and Lang Kids I like fruits and veggies I eat ‘em everyday To keep my body healthy So I can learn and play (repeat) Growing in the sunshine Drinking up the rain It’s nature’s way of showing us Something we all share— But no two are the same! Chorus: Shine ‘em up Take a bite Satisfy your appetite Apples oranges anything you like Shine ‘em up[ Eat ‘em down Feel the energy Go round and round Like apples and oranges Mommy tosses salad And Daddy steams the rice My sister sets the table Big brother adds the spice We all sit down together The celebration starts We serve the five food groups And shine up every heart Growing up so big and strong I’ll eat my meats and grains But I love fruits and vegetables They’re crunchy and sweet— But no two are the same! Chorus (2X) Growing up so big and strong I’ll eat my meats and grains But I love fruits and vegetables They’re crunchy and sweet— But no two are the same! Chorus (2X) © 2004 TuneBoyMusic 2 (ASCAP) 2 Shine ‘Em Up! Suggestions for physical activity: Small groups of 6-8 dancers in circle formation step in place. Students may be standing behind desks or in open space. This is a routine to warm up body for more vigorous exercise. (Standard 3) One player in each group begins leading low impact movements in place.
    [Show full text]
  • WRAP THESIS Kuzma 2011.Pdf
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/47816 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. Erotic Scenographies: Blanchot, Nietzsche & the Exigency of Return by Joseph Dlaboha Kuzma A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy & Literature University of Warwick, Department of Philosophy October 2011 Erotic Scenographies: Blanchot, Nietzsche & the Exigency of Return Contents Preface & Acknowledgments Introduction 1 Courtship & Despondency 21 The Ecstasy of Transmogrification 57 “A Voluptuousness of Hell” 112 The Absolute of Separation 147 The Irrevocable, the Prophetic 194 When Distance Collapsed 251 The Nothingness of Love 293 An Uncertain Covenant 319 “This Beating of a Hesitant Heart” 382 Afterword 433 Appendix 437 Bibliographic Materials Preface & Acknowledgements Some 400 metres above the unbroken azure of the Mediterranean coast, the narrowest of paths leads one upwards, around spires of eroded rock and boulder, to the walls of a medieval village perched high atop the summit. The path itself is not only steep but treacherous – carved out over many hundreds of years, it once led mules laden with cargo, rather precariously, from the port below, to the gates of a chateau, whose ruins still overlook the sea with a bruised, if undeterred, stateliness.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2002
    PORTABLE • BILL STEWART • CONSUMERS POLL RESULTS DENNISDENNIS CHAMBERS,CHAMBERS, KARLKARL PERAZZO,PERAZZO, RAULRAUL REKOWREKOW SSANTANAANTANA’’SS FFINESTINEST RRHYTHMHYTHM TTEAMEAM?? WWEEZEREEZER’’SS PPATAT WWILSONILSON TTHROUGHHROUGH TTHEHE YYEARSEARS WWITHITH TTERRYERRY BBOZZIOOZZIO NNEWEW FFOUNDOUND GGLORYLORY’’SS CCYRUSYRUS BBOLOOKIOLOOKI TTRADINGRADING FFOURSOURS WWITHITH PPHILLYHILLY JJOEOE $4.99US $6.99CAN 12 PPLUSLUS CCARLOSARLOS SSANTANAANTANA TTALKSALKS DDRUMMERSRUMMERS!! 0 74808 01203 9 ContentsContents Volume 27, Number 12 Cover photo by Paul La Raia SANTANA’S DENNIS CHAMBERS, RAUL REKOW, AND KARL PERAZZO The heaviest rhythm section in rock has just gotten heavier. Even Carlos Santana himself is in awe of his new Dennis Chambers–led ensemble. a a by Robin Tolleson i i a a R R a a L L l l u u a a 56 P P UPDATE 24 Portable’s Brian Levy WEEZER’S Wayward Shamans’ Barrett Martin AT ILSON 80 P W Fugazi’s Brendan Canty From Neil Peart obsessive to Muppet hostage, Pat Wilson has Mickey Hart been through a lot in ten years with Daryl Stuermer’s John Calarco pop gods Weezer. Oh, he plays the heck out of the drums, too. by Adam Budofsky MD CONSUMERS POLL RESULTS 50 The best in today’s gear—according to you. A DIFFERENT VIEW 74 a a i i a a NEW FOUND R R CARLOS SANTANA a a L L Just a sample of his drum cohorts over the l l GLORY’S u u a a years: Michael Shrieve, Jack DeJohnette, Horacio P P CYRUS BOLOOKI Hernandez, Tony Williams, Carter Beauford, 150 Chester Thompson, and now, Dennis Chambers. Even a disastrous fall from a Take your seats, class is about to begin.
    [Show full text]
  • 1975 San Francisco, CA Kezar Stadium SNACK Sunday ,
    March 23, 1975 San Francisco, CA Kezar Stadium SNACK Sunday , .........J.t..t.r ~ s.t.,Mlr.1, 1'75 Neil Young in SNACK ~·olk-rock sUlll'n-lar :'\e,I Krtth Younq, the Ooobie 81ulll1'r,, and the ~liracles huve been Promoter 8111 Gruham, added lo the Sund111 111 announcmg Young's :>iACK benefit concert rcir booklni:. noted thal the the S.F. sehools' sports and seven-boor show's roster Is cultural programs. in Ke- now complete zar Stadlum March ZJ be gmnmg at 10 a m Joan Baez, Jerry Gar­ cia. TW'er of Power, San­ Jommg Youn11 wtU be tana, Graham Centrnl Sta· drummer Levon Helm and lion. Jeffen;on7Slarshlp and bassl•t Rick Dan!.o of The others have already been Band and KUilansl Ben JIIIIOllllCed. 16 Ollla•b ltrlbunc Mon., March 24, 1975 Brande end Dylan Starsof SNACK1 Are You Ready For The Country Ain't That A Lot Of Love Looking For A Love Loving You Is Sweeter Than Ever I Want You The Weight Helpless FROMENGI..AW Knockin' On Heaven's Door Will The Circle Be Unbroken SNEAK PR~ Rick Danko – bass Bob Dylan –guitar, piano, harmonica Tim Drummond – guitar Levon Helm – drums Garth Hudson – keyboards Ben Keith – pedal steel guitar Neil Young - piano, guitar Notes: Broadcast live on K-101 radio. _.. THE PEARLFISH ERS t,yGeorgos8int IN ENGLISH produced by San Francisco Opera Kurt Herbert Adler, General Director at the PARAMOUNT THEATRE TUESDAY, APRIL 8 al 8:00 P.M. .8 Pwt lV-Tues.,'Mar. 25, 1975 l.llf ... )!OBERT HILBURN $200,000- SNACK Time--A Line-Up of Who Needs It? Talent in Live Stereo .
    [Show full text]
  • Simmel's Reading of Nietzsche
    Dominika Partyga Simmel’s reading of Nietzsche: the promise of “philosophical sociology” Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Partyga, Dominika (2016) Simmel’s reading of Nietzsche: the promise of “philosophical sociology”. Journal of Classical Sociology, 16 (4). pp. 414-437. ISSN 1468-795X DOI: 10.1177/1468795X16656267 © 2016 The Author This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/68865/ Available in LSE Research Online: January 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Dominika Partyga I London School of Economics I Department of Sociology Simmel’s reading of Nietzsche: The promise of “philosophical sociology” Abstract This article explores Simmel’s engagement with Nietzsche to illuminate the dynamics of ethical agency in his late life-philosophy. The main argument is that Simmel’s reworking of the Nietzschean themes of the will to power, distinction, and self-overcoming lays the ground for his vitalist ethics in The View of Life.
    [Show full text]