CURRICULUM VITAE 1. Abbott Gleason Professor History 2. 30

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CURRICULUM VITAE 1. Abbott Gleason Professor History 2. 30 CURRICULUM VITAE 1. Abbott Gleason Professor History 2. 30 John Street, Providence, RI 02906 3. BA, Harvard College, 1961 MA, ad eundum, Brown University, 1973 Ph.D., Harvard University, 1969 Dissertation topic: "European and Muscovite: A Life of Ivan Kireevsky" 4. Teaching Fellowships, Harvard University, 1964-68 Assistant Professor of History, Brown University, 1968-73 Associate Professor of History, Brown University, 1973-78 Professor of History, Brown University, 1978-- Associate of the Russian Research Center (Davis Center for Advanced Russian Studies), Harvard University, 1968-79, 1982--1998 Secretary (Director), Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC, February 1, 1980-June 1, 1982 Barnaby Conrad and Mary Critchfield Keeney Professor of History, Brown University, 1993--. Emeritus 2005 President, American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies, 1995-96 Director, Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University, 1999-2000 Director Watson Institute, for University Relations and Special Projects, 2000-2003 Senior Fellow, Watson Institute, 2003- Professor of Slavic Language and Literature, 2003-- 5. Publications Historiographical review: B. P. Koz'min, "Iz istorii revoliutsionnoi mysli v Rossii," Kritika, Winter, 1965. "The Emigration and Apostasy of Lev Tikhomirov," Slavic Review, September, 1967. European and Muscovite: Ivan Kireevsky and the Origins of Slavophilism, Harvard University Press, 1972. "Pavel Svin'in," in Marc Pachter, ed., Abroad in America: Visitors to the New Nation, 1776-1914. National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, 1976, pp. 12-21. "Solzhenitsyn and the Slavophiles," Yale Review, Autumn, 1975. "Peanut Butter," Country Journal, July 1975, reprinted in The Providence Journal, September 7, 1975. "Boris Chicherin" "Nikolai Grech" "Ivan Kireevsky" "Russian and Soviet Studies in the United States" Articles in The Modern Encyclopedia of Russian and Soviet History. Young Russia: The Genesis of Russian Radicalism in the 1860s, Viking Press, 1980. Paperback edition, University of Chicago Press, 1983. (Portions reprinted in James Miller, ed., The 1800s, Greenhaven Press, 2001.) "Dean Stambaugh" in Smith Hempstone, ed., An Illustrated History of St. Albans School, Glastonbury Press, 1981. "'Totalitarianism' in 1984", Russian Review, Vol. 43, No. 2 (1984), pp. 145-160. "Ivan Aksakov" "Konstantin Aksakov" "Nihilism" "Ivan Kireevsky" "Petr Kireevsky" "Moskvitianin" "Mikhail Pogodin" "Slavophilism" "Westernism" Articles in Victor Terras, ed., The Handbook of Russian Literature, Yale University Press, 1985 Bolshevik Culture: Experiment and Order in the Russian Revolution, Co-Editor with Peter Kenez and Richard Stites, Indiana University Press, 1985. Paperback edition, 1989. Shared Destiny: Soviet-American Relations from Roosevelt to Reagan, Co-Editor with Mark Garrison, Beacon Press, 1985. Paperback edition, 1987. "The Impact of US-Soviet Cultural Differences on the Summit", Providence Journal, October 16, 1985, reprinted in the Baltimore Sun, November 17, 1985. "Observers and Observed: The Heisenberg Syndrome" (with Michael Oksenberg and Allen Kassof), AAASS Newsletter, Vol. 26, No. 4, September, 1986, pp. 7-8. "Glasnost' in Russian History", SOVSET NEWS, January 27, 1987. "Other Visitors, Other Westernizers", Baltimore Sun, December 6, 1987. "Clash of American and Soviet Values Deeply Rooted in Historical Differences", Atlanta Constitution, January 8, 1988. "Letter from Armenia: Old Wounds and New Battles", Boston Globe, December 4, 1988. "The Great Reforms and the Historians since Stalin," Russian History/ Histoire Russe, vol. 17, No. 3 (Fall 1990), pp. 281-96. Reprinted in Larisa Zakharova (Moscow University) John Bushnell (North- western) and Ben Eklof (Indiana), Eds., Velikie reformy v Rossii, 1856-1874, simultaneous editions in Russian (Moscow University Press, 1992, and Indiana University Press, 1994). American edition entitled Russia's Great Reforms 1855-1881, ed. Eklof, Bushnell, Zakharova. "Reflections on Orwell, Totalitarianism and 1984" in Robert S. Peck, ed., To Govern A Changing Society: Constitutionalism and the Challenge of New Technology, Smithsonian Institution Press, 1990, pp. 11-19. "The Terms of Russian Social History" in Edith Clowes, Kas- sow and West, eds., Between Tsar and People: The Search for a Public Consciousness in Late Imperial Russia, Princeton University Press, 1991, pp. 15-27. "Tumult Lies Ahead as the Soviet Union Crumbles", San Francisco Chronicle, April 3, 1991 (title chosen by them). "Republic of Humbug: The Russian Nativist Critique of the United States,", The American Quarterly, March 1992, pp. 1-23. Summarized ("Research Notes") in The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 29, 1992, p. A10 and in The Wilson Quarterly ("Russian Nightmare"), Summer, 1992, pp. 149-150. "The Meaning of 1917," Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 270, No. 5, November, 1992, pp. 30-34. "We'll Miss You, Eddie," The Providence Journal, March 10, 1993, p. A9. "Never Again? Intervene in Bosnia or Cut the Clichés", The Providence Journal, April 17, 1993. "Pre-Soviet Russia and Democracy", "Alexander Kerensky" in Seymour M. Lipset, Ed., The Encyclopedia of Democracy, Congressional Quarterly Books, Washington D.C., 1995. "A Peculiar Capitalism Evolves in Russia," The Providence Journal, September 11, 1994. Totalitarianism: The Inner History of the Cold War, New York, Oxford University Press, 1995. A Nota Bene Selection, The Chronicle of Higher Education. "Forward: Karl Dietrich Bracher" in Karl-Dietrich Bracher, Turning Points in Modern Times: Essays on German and European History, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1995. "The Rhetoric of Totalitarianism," in Lieberman, Sochor, Powell and Terry, eds., The Soviet Empire Reconsidered, Westview Press, 1995. "Russia/Soviet Union", The Encyclopedia of U.S. Foreign Relations, Council on Foreign Relations, Oxford University Press, 1997. "Totalitarianism and the Cold War: A Personal View," NewsNet. The Newsletter of the AAASS, V. 35, No. 4, Sept., 1995, pp. 1-3. "The Delegitimation of Government," The Providence Journal, December 26, 1995, George St. Journal and reprinted elsewhere. "'Russian Totalitarianism'...Again?", German Politics and Society, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Spring, 1996), pp. 17-30. "The Ideological Structures of Modern Russian Culture", Cambridge Companion to Modern Russian Culture, Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 103-124. "Russia's View of NATO Expansion," Providence Journal, April 1, 1997 (and reprinted elsewhere) "Teaching Totalitarianism," Perspectives (American Historical Association) (April, 1997). "Interpreting the Soviet Union: the First Phase," (presidential address, AAASS), NewsNet, Jan., 1997. "Franco Venturi's Il populismo russo in the English-speaking world", Il coraggio della ragione. Franco Venturi intelettuale e storico cosmopolita, Einaudi Foundation, Turin, 1998. "Russian Decembrist Revolt," Jack A. Goldstone, ed.,The Encyclopedia of Political Revolutions, Congressional Quarterly Press, 1998. "Refighting the Last War," Providence Journal, April 16, 1998, p. B7 "Andrzej Walicki," Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Mysli Spolecznej, Vol 44, Warsaw, 1999, pp. 5-9. Nikita Khrushchev: Fresh Perspectives on the Last Communist, edited with William Taubman and Sergei Khrushchev, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2000. "Totalitarianism," in Joel Krieger, ed., The Oxford Companion to Politics of the World (second edition), New York, Oxford, 2001. "The Spiritual Landscape of Mikhail Nesterov," Ecumene, Summer, 2000. "The Communist Coup in Czechoslovakia: Western Policy and Response," in Robert Pynsent, ed., The Phoney Peace: Power and Culture in Central Europe, 1945-1949, SSES Occasional Paper # 46, pp. 182-193, SSES, University College, London, 2000. The Art of the Russian North (with Anne Odom, William Brumfield and Alison Hilton, Hillwood Museum, Washington D.C., 2001. "Bush and U.S.-Russian Relations," Providence Journal, April 7, 2001. "Where Academics Feared to Tread: Scholarly Advice on the Transition," Problems of Post-Communism, May-June, 2001, pp. 45-48. "Brown's Growing Global Studies," Providence Journal, March 10, 2002. "Adam Ulam as Historian," Kennan Institute Occasional Paper #282, June, 2002. "Ivan Kireevsky", "Aleksei Khomiakov, "Ivan Aksakov", "Konstantin Aksakov", "Slavophilism", "Panslavism", "Totalitarianism", The Encyclopedia of Russian History, Thompson-Gale, 2003. "U.S. War Against Liberalism," Providence Journal, April 6, 2003. "In Response to 'Discredited Beliefs,'", Kritika, Vol. 4, No. 2 Spring, 2003), pp. 379-381. "The Hard Road to Fascism," Boston Review, Summer, 2003. "Budgeting for Empire," Providence Journal, July 23, 2003 Three artists, Modern Encyclopedia of Russian and Soviet History, 2004; Ilia Chasnik; Sergei Chekhonin; Efim Sheptsov. “Anticommunismo,” “Hannah Arendt,” “Totalitarismo”, “Compagni di Strada,” in Robert Service and Silvio Pons, Dizionario del Communismo (forthcoming in 2006). Lectures and Papers "Some Notes on Intellectuals and 'Western Rationalism,'" presented at the Central Slavic Conference, Washington University, St. Louis, November, 1971. "1861-62: A Turning Point in Nineteenth-Century Russian Radicalism," Lecture delivered at the Russian and East European Institute, the University of Indiana, Bloomington, April 2, 1975. "The Anti-Modernism of Solzhenitsyn," presented at the American Historical Association meetings, Atlanta, Georgia, December 30, 1975. Variants delivered at Brown University,
Recommended publications
  • 1 Joseph Stalin: Power and Ideas
    Cambridge University Press 0521616530 - Stalin: A New History Edited by Sarah Davies and James Harris Excerpt More information 1 Joseph Stalin: power and ideas Sarah Davies and James Harris Stalin, like the other ‘evil dictators’ of the twentieth century, remains the subject of enduring public fascination.1 Academic attention, however, has shifted away from the study of ‘Great Men’, including Stalin, towards the little men and women, such as the now celebrated Stepan Podlubnyi, and towards Stalinist political culture more generally.2 Ironically this is at a time when we have unprecedented access to hitherto classified material on Stalin, the individual.3 The object of this volume is to reinvigorate scholarly interest in Stalin, his ideas, and the nature of his power. Although Stalin certainly did not single-handedly determine everything about the set of policies, practices, and ideas we have come to call Stalinism, it is now indisputable that in many respects his influence was decisive. A clearer understanding of his significance will allow more precise analysis of the origins and nature of Stalinism itself. 1 Note the interest in several recent publications aimed primarily at a popular readership: Martin Amis, Koba the Dread: Laughter and the Twenty Million (London: Jonathan Cape, 2002); Simon Sebag Montefiore, Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2003); Donald Rayfield, Stalin and his Hangmen (London: Viking, 2004). 2 Podlubnyi has been made famous by Jochen Hellbeck in a number of publications, including ‘Fashioning the Stalinist Soul: The Diary of Stepan Podlubnyi, 1931–1939’, Jahrbucher fu¨r Geschichte Osteuropas 44 (1996), 344–73.
    [Show full text]
  • Colloquium Paper January 12, 1984 STALINISM VERSUS
    Colloquium Paper January 12, 1984 STALINISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM? A Reconsideration by Robert C. Tucker Princeton University with comment by Peter Reddaway London School of Economics and Political Science Fellows Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Draft paper not for publication or quotation without written permission from the authors. STALINISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM? A Reconsideration Although not of ten openly debated~ the issue I propose to address is probably the deepest and most divisive in Soviet studies. There is good ground for Stephen Cohen's characterization of it as a "quintessential his­ torical and interpretive question"! because it transcends most of the others and has to do with the whole of Russia's historical development since the Bolshevik Revolution. He formulates it as the question of the relationship "between Bolshevism and Stalinism.'' Since the very existence of something properly called Stalinism is at issue here, I prefer a somewhat different mode of formulation. There are two (and curiously, only two) basically opposed positions on the course of development that Soviet Russia took starting around 1929 when Stalin, having ousted his opponents on the Left and the Right, achieved primacy, although not yet autocratic primacy, within the Soviet regime. The first position, Which may be seen as the orthodox one, sees that course of development as the fulfillment, under new conditions, of Lenin's Bolshevism. All the main actions taken by the Soviet regime under Stalin's leadership were, in other words, the fulfillment of what had been prefigured in Leninism (as Lenin's Bolshevism came to be called after Lenin died).
    [Show full text]
  • Works Cited Primary Sources CBS News
    Alaniz 1 ​ Works Cited ​ Primary Sources CBS News. “Apollo 11 Splashdown Live Stream: Watch ‘Live’ Coverage of the Apollo 11 Splashdown on This Date 50 Years Ago.” CBS News, CBS News, 24 July 2019, ​ ​ www.cbsnews.com/news/apollo-11-splashdown-watch-live-stream-50-years-ago-today-2 019-07-24/. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019. This source includes a wide variety of pictures and videos of the Apollo 11 landing back on Earth. It depicts the same live footage taken by CBS News on that day and images of the Apollo crew after they landed. It also includes videos of President Nixon greeting them on the boat and making a public declaration with them in quarantine after. This source brings the events that happened after the landing to my project. Freshspot Marketing LLC, and David Meerman Scott. “Apollo Press Kits.” Apollopresskits.Com, ​ ​ 2016, www.apollopresskits.com. This source includes valuable additional information not found in NASA issued news releases. Reporters and editors from media outlets including television and newspapers had access to such documents from dozens of manufacturers while working on stories about the first lunar landing, all their findings are located within the press kits found in this website. Those exclusive findings bring unknown facts that weren’t told before to my project. Alaniz 2 ​ Kennedy, John F. “We Choose To Go To The Moon” Speech. Address at Rice University on the ​ ​ Nation’s Space Effort. Document. This source includes the complete speech delivered by President John F. Kennedy at Rice ​ Stadium in Houston, Texas, on September 12, 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasionally, the Volume Suffers from the Problem of Repetition. This
    I I Occasionally, the volume suffers from the problem of repetition. This was proba- bly an editorial choice, and it does serve to bolster the truth-value of these memoirs; yet, in my view, this repetition weakens the force of the selections and makes it more likely that the reader will become desensitized to the real tragedies described in the memoirs. This said, Till My Tale Is Told is an important testimony to the Stalinist years and very useful as a teaching tool. Each selection is introduced by someone who knew the author of the piece (and/or by the editor of the volume). There is a good glossary and a short history of events at the back of the book as well as two short, in- formation-packed introductions (to the English and Russian editions) by Simeon Vilensky, and an afterword by John Crowfoot. The translations are good. And each of the testimonies begins with a photograph of the author - some in their youth, some in old age; this visual evocation provides intimacy and poignancy to the stories told in words. The original volume, Dodnes' tiagoteet (A Burden Borne to This Day) is longer by seven memoirs than the English edition; this editing down is an excellent choice as it makes the book more suitable for teaching. Overall, this is an intelligent volume - well thought-out and well put together. Till My Tale Is Told adds a great deal to those accounts already published: it delineates perspectives that are often different from the well-known accounts of Ginzburg and Solzhenitsyn and enhances such recent works as the diary selections in the 1995 Intimacy and Terror (Garros, Korenevskaya, La- husen, editors).
    [Show full text]
  • THE SOVIET MOON PROGRAM in the 1960S, the United States Was Not the Only Country That Was Trying to Land Someone on the Moon and Bring Him Back to Earth Safely
    AIAA AEROSPACE M ICRO-LESSON Easily digestible Aerospace Principles revealed for K-12 Students and Educators. These lessons will be sent on a bi-weekly basis and allow grade-level focused learning. - AIAA STEM K-12 Committee. THE SOVIET MOON PROGRAM In the 1960s, the United States was not the only country that was trying to land someone on the Moon and bring him back to Earth safely. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, also called the Soviet Union, also had a manned lunar program. This lesson describes some of it. Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS): ● Discipline: Engineering Design ● Crosscutting Concept: Systems and System Models ● Science & Engineering Practice: Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions GRADES K-2 K-2-ETS1-1. Ask questions, make observations, and gather information about a situation people want to change to define a simple problem that can be solved through the development of a new or improved object or tool. Have you ever been busy doing something when somebody challenges you to a race? If you decide to join the race—and it is usually up to you whether you join or not—you have to stop what you’re doing, get up, and start racing. By the time you’ve gotten started, the other person is often halfway to the goal. This is the sort of situation the Soviet Union found itself in when President Kennedy in 1961 announced that the United States would set a goal of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth before the end of the decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Korolev: How One Man Masterminded the Soviet Drive to Beat America to the Moon James Harford
    To purchase this product, please visit https://www.wiley.com/en-us/9780471327219 Korolev: How One Man Masterminded the Soviet Drive to Beat America to the Moon James Harford Paperback 978-0-471-32721-9 March 1999 Print-on- $26.00 demand DESCRIPTION How One Man Masterminded the Soviet Drive Beat America to the Moon. "Fascinating . packed with technical and historical detail for the space expert and enthusiast alike . Great stuff!"-New Scientist "In this exceptional book, James Harford pieces together a most compelling and well-written tale. Must reading."-Space News. "Through masterful research and an engaging narrative style, James Harford gives the world its first in-depth look at the man who should rightly be called the father of the Soviet space program."-Norman R. Augustine, CEO, Lockheed Martin. "In Korolev, James Harford has written a masterly biography of this enigmatic 'Chief Designer' whose role the Soviets kept secret for fear that Western agents might 'get at' him."-Daily Telegraph. "Harford's fluency in Russian and his intimate knowledge of space technology give us insights that few, if any, Americans and Russians have had into this dark history of Soviet space."-Dr. Herbert Friedman, Chief Scientist, Hulburt Center for Space Research Naval Research Laboratory. "Reveals the complex, driven personality of a man who, despite unjust imprisonment in the Gulag, toiled tirelessly for the Soviet military industrial complex. More than just a biography, this is also a history of the Soviet space program at the height of the Cold War. Highly recommended."-Library Journal. "For decades the identity of the Russian Chief Designer who shocked the world with the launching of the first Sputnik was one of the Soviet Union's best-kept secrets.
    [Show full text]
  • ALL-ROUND DEVELOPMENT of VLADIMIR LENIN's PERSONALITY Javed Akhter, Khair Muhammad and Naila Naz M.Phil Scholar, Department Of
    International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research Method Vol.3, No.1, pp.23-34, March 2016 ___Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.eajournals.org) ALL-ROUND DEVELOPMENT OF VLADIMIR LENIN’S PERSONALITY Javed Akhter, Khair Muhammad and Naila Naz M.Phil Scholar, Department of English Literature and Linguistics, University of Balochistan Quetta Balochistan Pakistan ABSTRACT: The study investigates the personality of Vladimir Lenin, in the light of Stephen R. Covey’s suggested habits, expounded in his books, “The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People” and “The 8th Habit: From Effectiveness to greatness”, following the most eminent Russian physiologist and psychologist I. P. Pavlov’s theory of classical behaviourism. Stephen R. Covey’s thought provoking and trend breaking book: “The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People” suggests seven habits and paradigms to become highly effective personality. He introduced the eighth habit in his innovative and challenging book “The 8th Habit: From Effectiveness to Greatness.” Therefore, his suggested eight habits, and paradigms, which are based on I. P. Pavlov’s theory of classical behaviourism. This paper would use the popped up chunks of I. P. Pavlov’s behaviourist theory to analyse how the process of habit formation influenced the effective and great personalities of the world. Therefore, the present study will enable the readers to confront Pavlov’s classical behaviourist theory of habit formation through stimuli and responses. The readers are also expected to abandon the bad habits and adopt the good ones. These infrequent but subtle hints serve as a model of effective as well as great personality of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism Since the Communist Manifesto
    University of Central Florida STARS PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements 1-1-1961 Marxism since the Communist manifesto Alfred G. Meyers Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/prism University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Book is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Meyers, Alfred G., "Marxism since the Communist manifesto" (1961). PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements. 22. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/prism/22 MARXISM SINCE THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO Ihe A4mcrim Httorlcal As¶datim, haguae at a eontiriw the teaching of history in the schd d the UzkiW esW&hcd the Wet Center for T&m cif Risary to offa qmWtive dtmce in m1ving some of the ptddum which tala7 beset ,the classraom teacher. me of the p- bdng sponsored by the Service Cmter is the prepiwaticb d a series of pampS1;1tts, each containing a eon& summary d pubkatio~~.@ectbg rt9:etwt research and new inte][prctatirms in a particular fidd d history. Prompted by an awarmea of the fact that the avaage 9condsry ~dmo1teacher has neither the time nor the opportunity to keep up with monographic litera- these pamphlets are specifically dt- dgnd to make available to the cl-m instructor a summary of pertinent trends aqd devdopments in historical study. Our aim is, in short, to help the teachem Up ems selves by keeping up to date in thdr fields d hiterest.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Road to the Stars Is Paved by the Communists!": Soviet Propaganda and the Hero-Myth of Iurii Gagarin
    "The Road to the Stars is Paved by the Communists!": Soviet Propaganda and the Hero-Myth of Iurii Gagarin Trevor Rockwell B.A., University of Victoria, 2003 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History O Trevor Sean Rockwell, 2005 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. Supervisor: Dr. Serhy Y ekelchyk ABSTRACT This thesis addresses Soviet propaganda of the world's first cosmonaut, Iurii Gagarin, and the first-manned space flight, Vostok 1, which took place on April 12, 1961. This thesis compares official Soviet biographies of Gagarin's life and Communist Party resolutions of the late 1950s and early 1960s. Key documents include Gagarin's autobiography The Road to the Stars (1961), and the Third Party Program of 1961. It concludes that the Gagarin propaganda closely corresponded to Party directives. In doing so, this thesis analyzes the key themes of the propaganda and suggests how the propaganda was used to legitimize the regime of Nikita Khrushchev. Supervisor: Dr. Serhy Yekelchyk (Department of History) TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract Table of Contents Introduction: Space Age Histories Chapter One: The Agitprop Apparatus Chapter Two: The General Line Chapter Three: Our Gagarin Chapter Four: The Road to the Stars Chapter Five: The Molding of the Rising Generation Conclusion: Immortal Gagarin Bibliography INTRODUCTION: SPACE AGE HISTORIES To put the first man in space was a highly symbolic technological milestone. Well aware of the propaganda benefits to be derived from such a feat, the USSR and the USA were, in 1961, racing to be the first.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Citizens' Opinions of Peace During the Cold War, May 1960
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository For Peace and Friendship of All Countries: Soviet Citizens' Opinions of Peace during the Cold War, May 1960 Aaron Todd Hale-Dorrell A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2009 Approved by: Donald J. Raleigh Louise McReynolds Donald M. Reid Abstract AARON TODD HALE-DORRELL: For Peace and Friendship of All Countries: Soviet Citizens' Opinions of Peace During the Cold War, May 1960 (Under the Direction of Dr. Donald J. Raleigh) This thesis analyzes a public opinion survey that sociologist Boris Grushin conducted in the Soviet Union in May 1960. His survey asked average Soviet citizens about war and peace immediately following a Cold War incident in which the Soviet military destroyed an American U-2 spy plane that had violated Soviet airspace. This thesis questions why, despite resulting heightened tensions between the superpowers, 96.8 percent of survey respondents expressed confidence that humanity could prevent war. I argue that, while propaganda promoting Khrushchev's “peaceful coexistence” policy influenced every respondent, some respondents emphasized different official policies and explanations for events, demonstrating a degree of independence from propaganda. Furthermore, respondents justified belief in peace and integrated themselves into a collective war narrative by describing experiences of World War II. Finally, I show that official interest in public opinion reflects Khrushchev-era political and cultural reforms, especially in Soviet journalism and sociology.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Cold War: a Historian's Personal Reflections by Adam B
    Understanding the Cold War: A Historian's Personal Reflections by Adam B. Ulam (2000), 311 pages. This is a remarkable book for various reasons. The publisher (author's wife Mary) notes that the author did not intend this to be another scholarly work. Rather, he wrote it at the very end of his life in the form of observations on the world. To hasten its appearance he decided to publish the work himself. Sadly, he died while in the midst of making final changes. His wife, his two sons, nephews, as well as his academic friends joined in the remarkable effort to supplement the original text with their own recollections pertaining to the specific periods of his life, a poignant help in making the book more inclusive. It was published by the Leopolis Press, a Latin name for Lwów, the birthplace of Adam Ulam who was born there in 1922 to a well­to­do family of lawyers, bankers, architects, and businessmen. He was surely born under more than just one lucky star. His older brother studied mathematics at Harvard under a special 4­year program, but in the summer of 1939 he revisited Lwów, with the return planned for September 3rd aboard the MS BATORY. The father of the boys made frantic efforts to get a U.S. student visa for Adam, just for one year, and luckily he succeeded. Suddenly the sailing date was changed to mid­August, and both sons bid their father good­bye, sailing from Gdynia. The last time they saw their father was when they waved to him at the Lwów railway station.
    [Show full text]
  • Tito's Yugoslavia
    The Search for a Communist Legitimacy: Tito's Yugoslavia Author: Robert Edward Niebuhr Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/1953 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2008 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of History THE SEARCH FOR A COMMUNIST LEGITIMACY: TITO’S YUGOSLAVIA a dissertation by ROBERT EDWARD NIEBUHR submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE ABSTRACT . iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS . v NOTE ON TRANSLATIONS AND TERMS . vi INTRODUCTION . 1 1 A STRUGGLE FOR THE HEARTS AND MINDS: IDEOLOGY AND YUGOSLAVIA’S THIRD WAY TO PARADISE . 26 2 NONALIGNMENT: YUGOSLAVIA’S ANSWER TO BLOC POLITICS . 74 3 POLITICS OF FEAR AND TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE . 133 4 TITO’S TWILIGHT AND THE FEAR OF UNRAVELING . 180 5 CONCLUSION: YUGOSLAVIA AND THE LEGACY OF THE COLD WAR . 245 EPILOGUE: THE TRIUMPH OF FEAR. 254 APPENDIX A: LIST OF KEY LCY OFFICIALS, 1958 . 272 APPENDIX B: ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF JNA, 1963 . 274 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 275 INDEX . 289 © copyright by ROBERT EDWARD NIEBUHR 2008 iii ABSTRACT THE SEARCH FOR A COMMUNIST LEGITIMACY: TITO’S YUGOSLAVIA ROBERT EDWARD NIEBUHR Supervised by Larry Wolff Titoist Yugoslavia—the multiethnic state rising out of the chaos of World War II—is a particularly interesting setting to examine the integrity of the modern nation-state and, more specifically, the viability of a distinctly multi-ethnic nation-building project.
    [Show full text]