Over-Paid, Over-Sexed and Over Here?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

U.S. MARINE AND AusTRALIAN SERVICEMAN SALUTE CITYGALLERY In this issue : GAL- A N D LERY OVER-PAID, OVER-SEXED D OVER HERE? U.S. MARINES IN WARTIME MELBOURNE 1943 NATION- Vol. 8, No. 3 17 FEB – 30 APR, 2010 4 Vol. 1 No. 1 CITY GALLERY FEB – APR, 2010 Vol. 1 No. 1 CITY GALLERY FEB – APR, 2010 A N OVER-PAID, OVER-SEXED D OVER HERE? U.S. MARINES IN WARTIME MELBOURNE 1943 attle-weary and in poor health B following the Guadalcanal campaign, an important turning point in the Allied fight against the Japanese, the men of the First Marine Division, United States Marine Corps were shipped to Melbourne for nine months recuperation in January 1943. Greeted with warm hospitality, these 15,000 young American men found a ‘home away from home’. They formed enduring friendships with Australian families, and romantic attachments with young Australian women. Drawing on original 2. research and incorporating oral histories, memoirs and letters, this exhibition examines the little-known troops to fight in Europe and the story of the U.S. Marines’ ‘friendly Middle East. On 7 December 1941 invasion’ of Melbourne during the Japanese bombed the American World War II. naval base at Pearl Harbor in Hawai’i, bringing the U.S. into the war. As the The sojourn of the Marines in Japanese advanced swiftly through 1. Melbourne is a small episode in the South-East Asia towards Australia, history of the Pacific war, which led Prime Minister John Curtin delivered Cover . Australian and United 1. (L–R) U.S. Marines Bill Christie States servicemen toast each other and Frank Knapp in Melbourne, 1943 to the strengthening of military and his famous address to the nation: at the allied forces get together night Rachel Jenzen Private Collection. cultural ties between Australia and ‘I make it quite clear that Australia at the Melbourne Cricket Ground. Melbourne, Vic. 14 March 1943. 2. Pocket Guide to Australia. the U.S. Australia had been at war looks to America, free of any pangs Australian War Memorial negative Issued to U.S. servicemen stationed in Australia number:138147. during World War II. United States. Produced since September 1939, entering the as to our traditional links or kinship by Army Special Service Division, 1942. conflict alongside Britain and sending with the United Kingdom’. 2 3 Vol. 1 No. 1 CITY GALLERY FEB – APR, 2010 Vol. 1 No. 1 CITY GALLERY FEB – APR, 2010 The Australian government fully Most importantly, the war forged While successive contingents of U.S. Pacific war at Guadalcanal in the supported U.S. General Douglas close personal friendships troops passed through Melbourne, Solomon Islands and later fought at MacArthur’s Australian-based between Australian civilians it is the lengthy nine-month stay Cape Gloucester, Peleliu, Okinawa command of Allied military and American soldiers. of the Marines during 1943 that and Iwo Jima. Approximately 90 operations in the Pacific. Curtin is distinctive and particularly per cent of Marines stationed in recalled Australian forces from the In early 1942,Melbourne was the memorable. The Marines considered Melbourne enlisted in a surge of Middle East to fight in Australia’s initial headquarters for the Allied Melbourne ‘their second home’. patriotism and were attracted to immediate region. Following the military effort in the south-west Pacific They even adopted the traditional the prestige and rigorous training of Japanese capture of Singapore on 15 and host to more than 30,000 U.S. Australian folksong ‘Waltzing Matilda’ the Corps. The majority were under February 1942 and the subsequent soldiers. Their presence stimulated as their ‘battle hymn’ and have twenty years of age, and they came bombing of Darwin, Australia was the city’s social and economic life, continued to sing it at every annual from all regions of the U.S. Most reliant on U.S. military protection. and made a considerable impression reunion since the war ended. were from agricultural or blue-collar With success at the battles of the upon the Australian people. With backgrounds and a considerable Coral Sea and Midway Island in preconceived ideas about the U.S. number were the sons of recent mid-1942, the Allied situation gleaned from Hollywood movies, immigrants to America. gradually improved. By 1943 there Melburnians eagerly learned about was anticipation in Australia and the ‘real’ American habits and customs. Melbourne was the biggest city some U.S. of victory over the Japanese. It was inevitable that in an environment had ever seen. By 1943 it was a city But this was not immediate and of wartime anxiety and social stress, in the midst of war. To protect its port intense fighting occurred throughout the government and churches facilities, factories and people from the Pacific until the war ended raised concerns about the ‘immoral’ aerial attack, streetlights were dimmed in August 1945. behaviour of young Australian women 3. under ‘brownout’ regulations and air- who fraternised with the dashing raid trenches were dug throughout World War II transformed Australian- young servicemen. By the middle The First Division Marines arrived parklands. Many staple items of food American relations and the strategic of 1942, however, General MacArthur in Melbourne as the heroes of and clothing were rationed or simply alliance forged between the two relocated Allied headquarters to Guadalcanal. Specialising in unobtainable. Civilians queued for countries left a significant legacy in Brisbane, and the American forces amphibious landings, the U.S. beer, chocolates and other luxuries. terms of foreign policy and regional were despatched to the military front. Marine Corps is an elite voluntary Strict federal controls were enforced security. The one million U.S. fighting force, ‘a breed apart’ from over all aspects of civilian life, from servicemen who passed through other branches of the American employment to travel to leisure. Australia during the war also spread military. Its reputation for daring new ideas about music, food, exploits was firmly established language and everyday modes of in World War II. The First Marine behaviour and influenced Australian Division is famous for launching 3. 1st Marine Division Guadalcanal Patch designed by General Merrill B. Twining, culture more broadly. the first American offensive of the 1943 . Rachel Jenzen Private Collection. 4 5 Vol. 1 No. 1 CITY GALLERY FEB – APR, 2010 Vol. 1 No. 1 CITY GALLERY FEB – APR, 2010 4. Melbourne war bride Dawne Balester (nee McLeod-Sharpe), Mentone, Australia, 1945. Reproduced by permission Balester family. 5. U.S. Marine Corporal Fred Balester, studio photograph, 1942. Reproduced by permission Balester family. 6. U.S. Marines and Australian friends, Melbourne, September 1943. Photo taken by U.S. Marine Private Bob Barton. Rachel Jenzen Private Collection. 4. 5. 6. More women than ever before The fighting at Guadalcanal had As the young men recovered, Eager to forget about the war, had entered the workforce, taking taken a terrible toll. As Marine they came to view Melbourne as the Marines found much to like on non-traditional roles. Families veteran Norris Cole recalled: ‘…the a kind of paradise, representing about Melbourne. Favourite places were split apart, and all young division suffered 100% casualties, the antithesis of war. and pastimes recalled include: adults were in the military services with the dead, wounded, and those the seaside suburb of St Kilda and or in essential war work. For Dawne sick from malaria, dengue fever, The Marines were mostly Luna Park; walks along the Yarra Balester, in her late teens in 1943: jungle rot, malnutrition and combat accommodated in the covered River and in the Botanic Gardens; ‘Melbourne was an empty city. fatigue… we were a pretty sickly spectator stands of the Melbourne dancing at the Palm Grove and the The only men you saw were little bunch’. Those most severely affected Cricket Ground, soon known as Trocadero; riding the trams; shopping boys or very old men…Women drove were sent to the 4th General Hospital Camp Murphy and only a short stroll in department stores; attending the trains, women delivered the mail, (now the Royal Melbourne Hospital) from the city centre. Smaller camps movies and the races; and viewing women did everything…. When [the in Parkville for treatment. Malaria were set up at the South Melbourne the famous nude portrait of ‘Chloe’ Marines] came, the whole city came was the most widespread condition, Cricket Ground and at Mount Martha publicly displayed in Young and alive again’. with the recurrent symptoms of the and Ballarat in regional Victoria. Jacksons’ hotel. tropical disease often mistaken by Officers lived in greater style, Australians for drunkenness. often enjoying private apartments. 6 7 Vol. 1 No. 1 CITY GALLERY FEB – APR, 2010 Vol. 1 No. 1 CITY GALLERY FEB – APR, 2010 7. Victory medals issued 10. Venereal disease to all City of Melbourne prevention poster employees. Medals, distributed by U.S. Victory; Europe and the military authorities Pacific, 1945. to servicemen stationed Maker: Stokes, Melbourne. in Australia. Poster, City of Melbourne Art Don’t Risk it Feller, Maker and Heritage Collection. unknown, 1942–45, ink on paper, 74 x 61cm, 8. U.S. Marines with City of Melbourne Art Australian family, and Heritage Collection 7. Victoria, 1943. Rachel Jenzen Private Collection 9. U.S. Marines march through Melbourne on George Washington’s birthday, 22 February 1943. City of Melbourne Art and Heritage Collection 8. 9. Melbourne was also the site of the and their first romantic and sexual Relationships between Melbourne Marines’ only public parade. Held on relationships. One Marine veteran women and U.S. Marines became George Washington’s Birthday, 22 recalled his Australian girl: ‘We a source of community tension and February 1943, Melburnians turned walked in the park, sat near the hostility, especially from Australian out in force to cheer ‘the saviours of Shrine of Remembrance, sat on the servicemen.
Recommended publications
  • Washington, Thursday, January 15, 1942

    Washington, Thursday, January 15, 1942

    FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 7 f\ i » 9 3 4 ^ NUMBER 10 c O a/ i t ì O ^ Washington, Thursday, January 15, 1942 The President shall be held for subsequent credit upon CONTENTS indebtedness to the Corporation, in ac­ cordance with the provisions of THE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE ORDER §§ 12.3112-51 and 12.3112-52.* Executive Order: Pa6e *§§ 12.3112-50 to 12.3112-52, inclusive, Alaska, partial revocation of or­ Partial R evocation of Executive Order issued under the authority contained in 48 der withdrawing certain No. 6957 of F ebruary 4, 1935, W it h ­ Stat. 344, 845; 12 U.S.C. §§ 1020, 1020a. public lands-------------------- 267 drawing Certain P ublic Lands § 12.3112-51 ' Interest; application of RULES, REGULATIONS, ALASKA conditional payments on indebtedness; ORDERS By virtue of the authority vested in disposition of unapplied conditional pay­ me by the act of June 25, 1910, c. 421, ments after payment of indebtedness in T itle 6—Agricultural Credit: 36 Stat. 847, Executive Order No. 6957 full. The provisions of §§ 10.387-51, Farm Credit Administration: of February 4, 1935, temporarily with­ 10.387-52, and 10.387-53,1 Part 10 of Title Federal Farm Mortgage Cor­ drawing certain lands in Alaska from ap­ 6, Code of Federal Regulations, dealing poration, conditional pay­ propriation under the public-land laws, with “Interest”, “Application of condi­ ments by borrowers------ 267 is hereby revoked as to the following- tional payments on indebtedness”, and Loans by production credit described tracts, in order to validate “Disposition of unapplied conditional associations, charges to homestead entry No.
  • Domain Parklands Master Plan 2019-2039 a City That Cares for the Environment

    Domain Parklands Master Plan 2019-2039 a City That Cares for the Environment

    DOMAIN PARKLANDS MASTER PLAN 2019-2039 A CITY THAT CARES FOR THE ENVIRONMENT Environmental sustainability is the basis of all Future Melbourne goals. It requires current generations to choose how they meet their needs without compromising the ability of future generations to be able to do the same. Acknowledgement of Traditional Owners The City of Melbourne respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, the Boon Wurrung and Woiwurrung (Wurundjeri) people of the Kulin Nation and pays respect to their Elders, past and present. For the Kulin Nation, Melbourne has always been an important meeting place for events of social, educational, sporting and cultural significance. Today we are proud to say that Melbourne is a significant gathering place for all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. melbourne.vic.gov.au CONTENTS A City That Cares For Its Environment 2 4. Master Plan Themes 23 1. Overview 5 4.1 Nurture a diverse landscape and parkland ecology 23 1.1 Why do we need a master plan? 6 4.2 Acknowledge history and cultural heritage 24 1.2 Vision 7 4.3 Support exceptional visitor experience 28 1.3 Domain Parklands Master Plan Snapshot 8 4.4 Improve people movement and access 32 1.4 Preparation of the master plan 9 4.5 Management and partnerships to build resilience 39 1.5 Community and Stakeholder engagement 10 5. Domain Parklands Precincts Plans 41 2. Domain Parklands 11 5.1 Precinct 1 - Alexandra and Queen Victoria Gardens 42 2.1 The history of the site 11 5.2 Precinct 2 - Kings Domain 43 2.2 The Domain Parklands today 12 5.3 Precinct 3 - Yarra Frontage and Government House 44 2.3 Strategic context and influences 12 5.4 Precinct 4 - Visitor Precinct 45 2.4 Landscape Characters 14 5.5 Precinct 5 - Kings Domain South 46 2.5 Land management and status 15 6.
  • Heritage Precincts: History and Significance

    Heritage Precincts: History and Significance

    MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 1 The City of Melbourne 5 Background History 5 City of Melbourne Summary Statement of Significance 11 2. Carlton Heritage Precinct 13 Background History 13 Statement of Significance for Carlton Heritage Precinct 16 3. East Melbourne Heritage Precinct including Jolimont and the Parliamentary Precinct 19 Background History 19 0 Statement of Significance for East Melbourne Heritage Precinct including Jolimont and the Parliamentary Precinct 22 4. Kensington & Flour Milling Heritage Precinct 27 Background History 27 Statement of Significance for Kensington & Flour Milling Heritage Precinct 29 5. North & West Melbourne Heritage Precinct 31 Background History 31 Statement of Significance for North & West Melbourne Heritage Precinct 34 6. Parkville Heritage Precinct 37 Background History 37 Statement of Significance for Perky'Ile Heritage Precinct 40 7. South Yarra Heritage Precinct 43 Background History 43 Statement of Significance for South Yarra Heritage Precinct 46 8. Bank Place Heritage Precinct 50 Background History 50 Statement of Significance for Bank Place Heritage Precinct 52 9. Bourke Hill Heritage Precinct 54 Background History 54 Statement of Significance for Bourke Hill Heritage Precinct 56 10. Collins Street East Heritage Precinct59 Background History 59 Statement of Significance for Collins Street East Heritage Precinct 61 REFERENCE DOCUMENT - PAGE 2 OF 94 MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME 11. Flinders Lane Heritage Precinct 64 Background History 64 Statement of Significance for Flinders Lane Heritage Precinct 65 12. Flinders Street Heritage Precinct 68 Background History 68 Statement of Significance for Flinders Street Heritage Precinct 69 13. Guildford Lane Heritage Precinct 72 Background History 72 Statement of Significance for Guildford Lane Heritage Precinct 73 14.
  • Background to Japanese American Relocation

    Background to Japanese American Relocation

    CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND TO JAPANESE AMERICAN RELOCATION Japanese Americans Prior to World War II The background to Japanese American relocation extends to the mid-19th century when individuals of Chinese descent first arrived in the Western U.S. to work as mine and railroad laborers (Appendix B). Discrimination against the Chinese arose soon after because of economic (i.e., unfair labor competition) and racial (i.e., claims of racial impurity and injury to western civilization) concerns. Because a significant portion of California’s population was Chinese (i.e., approximately 10% in 1870), California played a key role in this discrimination. In 1882, U.S. President Arthur signed into law the Chinese Exclusion Act that effectively ended Chinese immigration to the U.S. until 1943 when the U.S. was allied with China in World War II (Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, 1997). Individuals of Japanese descent began to emigrate in significant numbers to North America’s West Coast in the late 19th century (Appendix B). They came primarily because of the “push” of harsh economic conditions in Japan and the “pull” of employment opportunities in the U.S., partially created by the loss of the Chinese labor force (Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, 1997). Most of these first generation Japanese or Issei settled in California, Oregon, and Washington where they worked in the agriculture, timber, and fishing industries. In California alone, the number of Japanese immigrants increased from 1,147 in 1890 to 10,151 in 1900 (U.S. Census Office, 1895; 1901). The total Japanese American population in the U.S.
  • Or, Memori Phea Al and My Camp Internment Es of Uv

    Or, Memori Phea Al and My Camp Internment Es of Uv

    Prologue A DIARY OF MY MEMORIES——OR, MEMORIES OF UVPHEA AL AND MY CAMP INTERNMENT (1941 - 1942) THE SETTING: Los Angeles in Southern California The City of SAN PEDRO - Los Angeles Harbor The precise location: TERMINAL ISLAND The final days of the Japanese fishing settlement on Terminal Island, the resident fishermen and their families. THE TIME: 7 and 8 December 1941. NAME OF VESSEL: "BRITTANIA MARU" VESSEL OWNER: UONO, Michihiko SKIPPER: KIBATA, Masanobu LOOK-OUT: UONO, Yukizo LIFE-BOATS: SHIGEI, Iwao Toyojiro Suzuki and his fellow men-of-the-sea who shared the same fate Translated into the English language for my children and their children, in March of 1982. Translated by: JY The forty-two names listed at the beginning of my diary— starting with Ryokichi Hashimoto and ending with Yaoichi Ichiki ——are the names of my fellow fishermen and my fellow countrymen with whom I Journeyed North to a barren and God-forsaken area of ice and snow near the Canadian border. Here——in the isolated backcountry of North Dakota, we were forcibly incarcerated. Our lengthy confinement within an encirclement of armed guards was for political reasons that were far beyond the control of the men of the fishing fleet in Fish Harbor--- -- . TERMINAL ISIAND. T. Suzuki On 7 December 1941——at 12 O'clock midnight, we weigh anchor and depart from Fish Harbor, Terminal Island, and head for the open sea. As we approach the lighthouse at the tip of the breakwater, we notice many, many buoys floating on the water surface. We turn our starboard side to the lighthouse and veer left toward the west.
  • Of Australia's First Woman Sculptor and Her War Memorials

    Of Australia's First Woman Sculptor and Her War Memorials

    In Memoriam: World War I memorials by the Australian sculptor Margaret Baskerville (1861-1930). Margaret A. Rose, FAHA, FRHistS Margaret Francis Ellen (“Nell”) Baskerville was born in Melbourne, Victoria in 1861 and was one of the first Australian-born women artists to become a professional sculptor. This brief illustrated account of her war memorials is based on my study of her work and that of her husband and fellow sculptor C. Douglas Richardson, which was published for the Brighton (now Bayside) City Council collection of their paintings and sculpture under the title Victorian Artists. Margaret Baskerville (1861-1930) and C. Douglas Richardson (1853-1932) in 1988. Several memorials to the fallen were commissioned and completed by sculptors as well as by stonemasons in Australia in the aftermath of the “Great War”. Many are recorded, and some are illustrated, in the numerous editions of Sacred Places: War Memorials in the Australian Landscape by K.S. Inglis, assisted by Jan Brazier, of 1998, as well as – more recently – on websites such as those for the “Monument Australia” and “Victorian Heritage” databases. As Inglis has noted, the majority of the war memorials unveiled in the public spaces of Australian towns following World War I had been for – and had illustrated – the male soldiers who had fought and fallen in battle. Amongst the memorials built and unveiled following World War I were, however, also two by the Australian sculptor Margaret Baskerville (1861-1930) for the British nurse Edith Louisa Cavell. Cavell (born in Norfolk, England in 1865) had trained as a nurse in London under a friend of Florence Nightingale (Matron Eva Luckes), had taken up work in Belgium and been executed there at dawn on 12 October 1915 by order of the German Military Governor of Brussels for having assisted in the escape of allied soldiers, and despite the fact that she had tended the wounded of both sides.
  • 2 Secret Gardens

    2 Secret Gardens

    Flinders Street Melbourne Walks To begin, walk south along St Kilda Road until you’re opposite the Arts Centre Federation Melbourne, then step down to the left into Square the peaceful Queen Victoria Gardens 1 . N Pause for a royal moment to inspect the Secret Queen Victoria Monument 2 . Princes 2 Wander along the many pathways in the Bridge Birrarung Marr Gardens garden, under the shade of tall trees, past Hamer glorious flower displays and across sunny Hall lawns. Discover the sculptures 3 dotted Arts Centre Melbourne through the park, including The Phoenix, Boa t h ouse Sculptures, monuments, State, Fairfax The Pathfinder, The Water Children, Water Studio & D Playhouse 43 Alexandre r the Arts Centre Melbourne and the Arts Centre Melbourne Steps iv Nymph and The Genii. Ale Gardens e xandr beautiful Royal Botanic Gardens. 1 Riverslide Walk back towards St Kilda Road and ad a Queen 42 Skate 4 A Park you’ll find the much lovedFloral Clock Victoria v Walking time 2.5 hours a Ro enue opposite the National Gallery of Victoria. Gardens 40 NGV ild Distance 6 Kilometres International 2 Look up to the equestrian statue of Queen t K S 3 5 41 Victoria’s son Edward VII . 5 4 Avenue hg ow Just over Linlithgow Avenue near Walker Linlit 10 Aboriginal 39 Fountain, cross to the ‘Tan’ 6 , where Burial Stone Melbourne’s fit and fabulous come to jog. Henley Kings Landing The 4km track was named after its original 6 9 Domain Tan 38 bark surface and used by horse riders until Track 7 L inlit the 1940s.
  • Was Armament Minister Albert Speer Really Responsible for the German

    Was Armament Minister Albert Speer Really Responsible for the German

    Was armament minister Albert Speer really responsible for the German “armament miracle” during World War II? New doubts arising from the annual audits of the German aircraft producers. Jonas Scherner University of Mannheim Jochen Streb University of Hohenheim Abstract Armament minister Albert Speer is usually credited with causing the upswing in German armament production after 1941. Exploring the annual audit reports of the Deutsche Revisions- und Treuhand AG for six different firms, we question this view by showing that in the German aircraft industry the crucial political changes already occurred before World War II. The government decided in 1938 that aircraft producers had to concentrate on a few different types, and in 1937 cost-plus contracts were replaced with fixed price contracts. What followed was not a sudden production miracle but a continuous development which was fuelled by learning-by-doing and by the ongoing growth of the capital endowment. Preliminary version. Please do not quote. Comments are welcome. 1 The German armament miracle In December 1941 the Russian army stopped the German Wehrmacht near Moscow. That along with the United States’ entry into World War II brought the National Socialists’ strategy to fight so-called Blitzkriege, which could be waged with a comparatively low number of soldiers and arms, to a sudden end.1 Now confronted with the prospect of a long-lasting war against the Unites States and Soviet Russia, the German military planners acknowledged that they had to increase their armament production considerably. This insight was frankly made public by the economic journal Deutscher Volkswirt (1942, p.
  • PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS PAGE Authors’ Copy: Published in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2019 DOI: 10.1177/0263775819852362

    PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS PAGE Authors’ Copy: Published in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2019 DOI: 10.1177/0263775819852362

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RMIT Research Repository Thank you for downloading this document from the RMIT Research Repository. The RMIT Research Repository is an open access database showcasing the research outputs of RMIT University researchers. RMIT Research Repository: http://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/ Citation: Porter, L, Jackson, S and Johnson, L 2019, 'Remaking imperial power in the city: the case of the William Barak building, Melbourne', Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1119-1137. 6HHWKLVUHFRUGLQWKH50,75HVHDUFK5HSRVLWRU\DW https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:56299 9HUVLRQ Accepted Manuscript &RS\ULJKW6WDWHPHQW The Author(s) 2019 /LQNWR3XEOLVKHG9HUVLRQ https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819852362 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS PAGE Authors’ copy: Published in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2019 DOI: 10.1177/0263775819852362 Remaking imperial power in the city: the case of the William Barak building, Melbourne Libby Porter1, Sue Jackson2 and Louise Johnson3 Abstract When the enormous drapes that had been covering a new building in central Melbourne were thrown off in early 2015, an extraordinary sight was revealed: a colossal image of a face staring down the city’s civic spine. This moment of unveiling marked a fascinating moment for Indigenous-settler relations in Australia, but especially urban, densely settled Melbourne. For the face is that of William Barak, ancestor and leader of the Wurundjeri people, whose country was stolen and remade into what we now know as Melbourne. That an early land rights champion is represented in the built form at such a pivotal location in the city that dispossessed his people offers an opportunity to consider the forms of violence, appropriation and misrepresentation that are perpetually constitutive of settler-colonial cities.
  • Submission-In-Chief Melbourne Metro Rail Project EES Hearing Thank Y

    Submission-In-Chief Melbourne Metro Rail Project EES Hearing Thank Y

    National Trust of Australia (Victoria) ABN 61 004 356 192 Tasma Terrace 4 Parliament Place 12 September 2016 East Melbourne Victoria 3002 Email: [email protected] Web: www.nationaltrust.orG.au National Trust of Australia (Victoria) submission-in-chief T 03 9656 9800 F 03 9656 5397 Melbourne Metro Rail Project EES hearing Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment regarding the Melbourne Metro Rail Project (MMRP). We are cognisant of the strategic justification for the project, and we understand that heritage is but one factor that will constrain the MMRP design and construction. Although the tunnelling method adopted will avoid many impacts on heritage, where works are required at street level they often intersect with places of heritage significance, which should be avoided wherever possible, particularly with regard to the Domain where it is very important to provide certainty that the landscape will not be negatively affected. 1 PRECINCT 1—TUNNELS 1.1 Domain Parklands H2304, HO398 - Tom’s Block The National Trust has heard the evidence of Mr Patrick and Mr Shears and retains serious concerns about the effect of soil stabilisation using ‘grouting’ techniques on trees in Tom’s Block. It was the evidence of Mr Lovell, Mr Shears, and Mr Patrick that the alignment should preferably go under CityLink to avoid impacts on the Domain. It is our submission that the alignment option above CityLink would have an unacceptable detrimental impact on the heritage of the Domain, which is characterised by a parkland of scattered trees dotted across lawns, divided by avenue plantings along winding roads and paths.
  • Shrine of Remembrance St Kilda Road, Melbourne Conservation

    Shrine of Remembrance St Kilda Road, Melbourne Conservation

    Shrine of Remembrance St Kilda Road, Melbourne Conservation Management Plan Shrine of Remembrance St Kilda Road, Melbourne Conservation Management Plan Prepared for the Shrine of Remembrance Trustees October 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and brief 1 1.2 Site Location and Description 1 1.2.1 Location 1 1.2.2 Description 1 1.3 Heritage Controls and Listings 1 1.3.1 Victorian Heritage Act 1995 1 1.3.2 Planning and Environment Act 1987 2 1.3.3 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) 3 1.3.4 Non-Statutory Listings 4 1.4 Methodology and Terminology 4 1.5 Archaeology 4 2.0 HISTORY 9 2.1 Planning for Victoria’s War Memorial: Choice of a Site 9 2.2 The War Memorial Design Competition 11 2.3 The Architects 11 2.4 The Winning Design 12 2.5 Fundraising 16 2.6 Construction of the Shrine 1928-34 17 2.7 Initial Landscaping Works 1928-1934 20 2.8 World War II Memorial Competition 26 2.9 Landscaping Developments 1951-2000 27 2.9.1 Hard Landscaping Features 27 2.9.2 Plantings 30 2.10 Building Alterations and Maintenance Works 1934-2000 31 2.10.1 Alterations 31 2.10.2 Maintenance Works 32 2.11 Developments Since 2001 33 2.11.1 Building Works 33 2.11.2 Landscaping Developments 34 2.12 A Commemorative Place 34 3.0 PHYSICAL ANAYLSIS 37 3.1 Introduction 37 3.2 Documentation 37 3.3 The Site 37 3.4 Individual Buildings and Elements 40 3.4.1 The Shrine (1929-34) 40 I 3.4.2 Visitor Centre (2003) 57 3.4.3 WWII Forecourt (1951-54) 60 3.4.4 Cenotaph (1955) 61 3.4.5 Eternal Flame (1954) 62 3.4.6 Flagpoles (1954)
  • Shrine of Remembrance

    Shrine of Remembrance

    Nationally Significant 20th-Century Architecture Revised 9/01/2012 Shrine of Remembrance Address Burdwood Drive, South Yarra 3141 Practice Hudson & Wardrop Designed 1923 Completed 1934 Address History & The building of the Shrine of Remembrance was a commemoration Description of an appalling sacrifice of life in war and an assertion of the nobility of the cause for which so many died. Its huge scale reflects the anguish of the community in that period, and the memorial has continuing significance for subsequent generations to the present Burdwood Drive day. Its design arose from a world wide competition won in 1923 by two South Yarra Melbourne architects and ex-servicemen, Philip Burgoyne Hudson (1887-1952) and James Hastie Wardrop (1891-1975). Both had Vic 3141 studied under D'Ebro and each was a recipient of the Silver Medal of the RAIA. The design, said to be based on the Mausoleum at Halicarnassus, also reflects the contemporary revival architecture of the late 1920s as seen in other such examples which are strongly Neo-Greco in style. However the Shrine, being closer in function to the ancient prototypes, expresses this style more fully both in its external monumental form and in the superb detail of its bronze metalwork. The Domain Hill site, comprising a low hill on the axis of Swanston Street and embraced by a bend of St Kilda Road, gives the Shrine prominence and visibility from all directions. The Shrine is set in a direct line with Swanston Street and is the most dominant of the RAIA Nº three long vistas in Melbourne.