Over-Paid, Over-Sexed and Over Here?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Washington, Thursday, January 15, 1942
FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 7 f\ i » 9 3 4 ^ NUMBER 10 c O a/ i t ì O ^ Washington, Thursday, January 15, 1942 The President shall be held for subsequent credit upon CONTENTS indebtedness to the Corporation, in ac cordance with the provisions of THE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE ORDER §§ 12.3112-51 and 12.3112-52.* Executive Order: Pa6e *§§ 12.3112-50 to 12.3112-52, inclusive, Alaska, partial revocation of or Partial R evocation of Executive Order issued under the authority contained in 48 der withdrawing certain No. 6957 of F ebruary 4, 1935, W it h Stat. 344, 845; 12 U.S.C. §§ 1020, 1020a. public lands-------------------- 267 drawing Certain P ublic Lands § 12.3112-51 ' Interest; application of RULES, REGULATIONS, ALASKA conditional payments on indebtedness; ORDERS By virtue of the authority vested in disposition of unapplied conditional pay me by the act of June 25, 1910, c. 421, ments after payment of indebtedness in T itle 6—Agricultural Credit: 36 Stat. 847, Executive Order No. 6957 full. The provisions of §§ 10.387-51, Farm Credit Administration: of February 4, 1935, temporarily with 10.387-52, and 10.387-53,1 Part 10 of Title Federal Farm Mortgage Cor drawing certain lands in Alaska from ap 6, Code of Federal Regulations, dealing poration, conditional pay propriation under the public-land laws, with “Interest”, “Application of condi ments by borrowers------ 267 is hereby revoked as to the following- tional payments on indebtedness”, and Loans by production credit described tracts, in order to validate “Disposition of unapplied conditional associations, charges to homestead entry No. -
Domain Parklands Master Plan 2019-2039 a City That Cares for the Environment
DOMAIN PARKLANDS MASTER PLAN 2019-2039 A CITY THAT CARES FOR THE ENVIRONMENT Environmental sustainability is the basis of all Future Melbourne goals. It requires current generations to choose how they meet their needs without compromising the ability of future generations to be able to do the same. Acknowledgement of Traditional Owners The City of Melbourne respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, the Boon Wurrung and Woiwurrung (Wurundjeri) people of the Kulin Nation and pays respect to their Elders, past and present. For the Kulin Nation, Melbourne has always been an important meeting place for events of social, educational, sporting and cultural significance. Today we are proud to say that Melbourne is a significant gathering place for all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. melbourne.vic.gov.au CONTENTS A City That Cares For Its Environment 2 4. Master Plan Themes 23 1. Overview 5 4.1 Nurture a diverse landscape and parkland ecology 23 1.1 Why do we need a master plan? 6 4.2 Acknowledge history and cultural heritage 24 1.2 Vision 7 4.3 Support exceptional visitor experience 28 1.3 Domain Parklands Master Plan Snapshot 8 4.4 Improve people movement and access 32 1.4 Preparation of the master plan 9 4.5 Management and partnerships to build resilience 39 1.5 Community and Stakeholder engagement 10 5. Domain Parklands Precincts Plans 41 2. Domain Parklands 11 5.1 Precinct 1 - Alexandra and Queen Victoria Gardens 42 2.1 The history of the site 11 5.2 Precinct 2 - Kings Domain 43 2.2 The Domain Parklands today 12 5.3 Precinct 3 - Yarra Frontage and Government House 44 2.3 Strategic context and influences 12 5.4 Precinct 4 - Visitor Precinct 45 2.4 Landscape Characters 14 5.5 Precinct 5 - Kings Domain South 46 2.5 Land management and status 15 6. -
Heritage Precincts: History and Significance
MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 1 The City of Melbourne 5 Background History 5 City of Melbourne Summary Statement of Significance 11 2. Carlton Heritage Precinct 13 Background History 13 Statement of Significance for Carlton Heritage Precinct 16 3. East Melbourne Heritage Precinct including Jolimont and the Parliamentary Precinct 19 Background History 19 0 Statement of Significance for East Melbourne Heritage Precinct including Jolimont and the Parliamentary Precinct 22 4. Kensington & Flour Milling Heritage Precinct 27 Background History 27 Statement of Significance for Kensington & Flour Milling Heritage Precinct 29 5. North & West Melbourne Heritage Precinct 31 Background History 31 Statement of Significance for North & West Melbourne Heritage Precinct 34 6. Parkville Heritage Precinct 37 Background History 37 Statement of Significance for Perky'Ile Heritage Precinct 40 7. South Yarra Heritage Precinct 43 Background History 43 Statement of Significance for South Yarra Heritage Precinct 46 8. Bank Place Heritage Precinct 50 Background History 50 Statement of Significance for Bank Place Heritage Precinct 52 9. Bourke Hill Heritage Precinct 54 Background History 54 Statement of Significance for Bourke Hill Heritage Precinct 56 10. Collins Street East Heritage Precinct59 Background History 59 Statement of Significance for Collins Street East Heritage Precinct 61 REFERENCE DOCUMENT - PAGE 2 OF 94 MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME 11. Flinders Lane Heritage Precinct 64 Background History 64 Statement of Significance for Flinders Lane Heritage Precinct 65 12. Flinders Street Heritage Precinct 68 Background History 68 Statement of Significance for Flinders Street Heritage Precinct 69 13. Guildford Lane Heritage Precinct 72 Background History 72 Statement of Significance for Guildford Lane Heritage Precinct 73 14. -
Background to Japanese American Relocation
CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND TO JAPANESE AMERICAN RELOCATION Japanese Americans Prior to World War II The background to Japanese American relocation extends to the mid-19th century when individuals of Chinese descent first arrived in the Western U.S. to work as mine and railroad laborers (Appendix B). Discrimination against the Chinese arose soon after because of economic (i.e., unfair labor competition) and racial (i.e., claims of racial impurity and injury to western civilization) concerns. Because a significant portion of California’s population was Chinese (i.e., approximately 10% in 1870), California played a key role in this discrimination. In 1882, U.S. President Arthur signed into law the Chinese Exclusion Act that effectively ended Chinese immigration to the U.S. until 1943 when the U.S. was allied with China in World War II (Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, 1997). Individuals of Japanese descent began to emigrate in significant numbers to North America’s West Coast in the late 19th century (Appendix B). They came primarily because of the “push” of harsh economic conditions in Japan and the “pull” of employment opportunities in the U.S., partially created by the loss of the Chinese labor force (Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, 1997). Most of these first generation Japanese or Issei settled in California, Oregon, and Washington where they worked in the agriculture, timber, and fishing industries. In California alone, the number of Japanese immigrants increased from 1,147 in 1890 to 10,151 in 1900 (U.S. Census Office, 1895; 1901). The total Japanese American population in the U.S. -
Or, Memori Phea Al and My Camp Internment Es of Uv
Prologue A DIARY OF MY MEMORIES——OR, MEMORIES OF UVPHEA AL AND MY CAMP INTERNMENT (1941 - 1942) THE SETTING: Los Angeles in Southern California The City of SAN PEDRO - Los Angeles Harbor The precise location: TERMINAL ISLAND The final days of the Japanese fishing settlement on Terminal Island, the resident fishermen and their families. THE TIME: 7 and 8 December 1941. NAME OF VESSEL: "BRITTANIA MARU" VESSEL OWNER: UONO, Michihiko SKIPPER: KIBATA, Masanobu LOOK-OUT: UONO, Yukizo LIFE-BOATS: SHIGEI, Iwao Toyojiro Suzuki and his fellow men-of-the-sea who shared the same fate Translated into the English language for my children and their children, in March of 1982. Translated by: JY The forty-two names listed at the beginning of my diary— starting with Ryokichi Hashimoto and ending with Yaoichi Ichiki ——are the names of my fellow fishermen and my fellow countrymen with whom I Journeyed North to a barren and God-forsaken area of ice and snow near the Canadian border. Here——in the isolated backcountry of North Dakota, we were forcibly incarcerated. Our lengthy confinement within an encirclement of armed guards was for political reasons that were far beyond the control of the men of the fishing fleet in Fish Harbor--- -- . TERMINAL ISIAND. T. Suzuki On 7 December 1941——at 12 O'clock midnight, we weigh anchor and depart from Fish Harbor, Terminal Island, and head for the open sea. As we approach the lighthouse at the tip of the breakwater, we notice many, many buoys floating on the water surface. We turn our starboard side to the lighthouse and veer left toward the west. -
Of Australia's First Woman Sculptor and Her War Memorials
In Memoriam: World War I memorials by the Australian sculptor Margaret Baskerville (1861-1930). Margaret A. Rose, FAHA, FRHistS Margaret Francis Ellen (“Nell”) Baskerville was born in Melbourne, Victoria in 1861 and was one of the first Australian-born women artists to become a professional sculptor. This brief illustrated account of her war memorials is based on my study of her work and that of her husband and fellow sculptor C. Douglas Richardson, which was published for the Brighton (now Bayside) City Council collection of their paintings and sculpture under the title Victorian Artists. Margaret Baskerville (1861-1930) and C. Douglas Richardson (1853-1932) in 1988. Several memorials to the fallen were commissioned and completed by sculptors as well as by stonemasons in Australia in the aftermath of the “Great War”. Many are recorded, and some are illustrated, in the numerous editions of Sacred Places: War Memorials in the Australian Landscape by K.S. Inglis, assisted by Jan Brazier, of 1998, as well as – more recently – on websites such as those for the “Monument Australia” and “Victorian Heritage” databases. As Inglis has noted, the majority of the war memorials unveiled in the public spaces of Australian towns following World War I had been for – and had illustrated – the male soldiers who had fought and fallen in battle. Amongst the memorials built and unveiled following World War I were, however, also two by the Australian sculptor Margaret Baskerville (1861-1930) for the British nurse Edith Louisa Cavell. Cavell (born in Norfolk, England in 1865) had trained as a nurse in London under a friend of Florence Nightingale (Matron Eva Luckes), had taken up work in Belgium and been executed there at dawn on 12 October 1915 by order of the German Military Governor of Brussels for having assisted in the escape of allied soldiers, and despite the fact that she had tended the wounded of both sides. -
2 Secret Gardens
Flinders Street Melbourne Walks To begin, walk south along St Kilda Road until you’re opposite the Arts Centre Federation Melbourne, then step down to the left into Square the peaceful Queen Victoria Gardens 1 . N Pause for a royal moment to inspect the Secret Queen Victoria Monument 2 . Princes 2 Wander along the many pathways in the Bridge Birrarung Marr Gardens garden, under the shade of tall trees, past Hamer glorious flower displays and across sunny Hall lawns. Discover the sculptures 3 dotted Arts Centre Melbourne through the park, including The Phoenix, Boa t h ouse Sculptures, monuments, State, Fairfax The Pathfinder, The Water Children, Water Studio & D Playhouse 43 Alexandre r the Arts Centre Melbourne and the Arts Centre Melbourne Steps iv Nymph and The Genii. Ale Gardens e xandr beautiful Royal Botanic Gardens. 1 Riverslide Walk back towards St Kilda Road and ad a Queen 42 Skate 4 A Park you’ll find the much lovedFloral Clock Victoria v Walking time 2.5 hours a Ro enue opposite the National Gallery of Victoria. Gardens 40 NGV ild Distance 6 Kilometres International 2 Look up to the equestrian statue of Queen t K S 3 5 41 Victoria’s son Edward VII . 5 4 Avenue hg ow Just over Linlithgow Avenue near Walker Linlit 10 Aboriginal 39 Fountain, cross to the ‘Tan’ 6 , where Burial Stone Melbourne’s fit and fabulous come to jog. Henley Kings Landing The 4km track was named after its original 6 9 Domain Tan 38 bark surface and used by horse riders until Track 7 L inlit the 1940s. -
Was Armament Minister Albert Speer Really Responsible for the German
Was armament minister Albert Speer really responsible for the German “armament miracle” during World War II? New doubts arising from the annual audits of the German aircraft producers. Jonas Scherner University of Mannheim Jochen Streb University of Hohenheim Abstract Armament minister Albert Speer is usually credited with causing the upswing in German armament production after 1941. Exploring the annual audit reports of the Deutsche Revisions- und Treuhand AG for six different firms, we question this view by showing that in the German aircraft industry the crucial political changes already occurred before World War II. The government decided in 1938 that aircraft producers had to concentrate on a few different types, and in 1937 cost-plus contracts were replaced with fixed price contracts. What followed was not a sudden production miracle but a continuous development which was fuelled by learning-by-doing and by the ongoing growth of the capital endowment. Preliminary version. Please do not quote. Comments are welcome. 1 The German armament miracle In December 1941 the Russian army stopped the German Wehrmacht near Moscow. That along with the United States’ entry into World War II brought the National Socialists’ strategy to fight so-called Blitzkriege, which could be waged with a comparatively low number of soldiers and arms, to a sudden end.1 Now confronted with the prospect of a long-lasting war against the Unites States and Soviet Russia, the German military planners acknowledged that they had to increase their armament production considerably. This insight was frankly made public by the economic journal Deutscher Volkswirt (1942, p. -
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS PAGE Authors’ Copy: Published in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2019 DOI: 10.1177/0263775819852362
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RMIT Research Repository Thank you for downloading this document from the RMIT Research Repository. The RMIT Research Repository is an open access database showcasing the research outputs of RMIT University researchers. RMIT Research Repository: http://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/ Citation: Porter, L, Jackson, S and Johnson, L 2019, 'Remaking imperial power in the city: the case of the William Barak building, Melbourne', Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1119-1137. 6HHWKLVUHFRUGLQWKH50,75HVHDUFK5HSRVLWRU\DW https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:56299 9HUVLRQ Accepted Manuscript &RS\ULJKW6WDWHPHQW The Author(s) 2019 /LQNWR3XEOLVKHG9HUVLRQ https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819852362 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS PAGE Authors’ copy: Published in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2019 DOI: 10.1177/0263775819852362 Remaking imperial power in the city: the case of the William Barak building, Melbourne Libby Porter1, Sue Jackson2 and Louise Johnson3 Abstract When the enormous drapes that had been covering a new building in central Melbourne were thrown off in early 2015, an extraordinary sight was revealed: a colossal image of a face staring down the city’s civic spine. This moment of unveiling marked a fascinating moment for Indigenous-settler relations in Australia, but especially urban, densely settled Melbourne. For the face is that of William Barak, ancestor and leader of the Wurundjeri people, whose country was stolen and remade into what we now know as Melbourne. That an early land rights champion is represented in the built form at such a pivotal location in the city that dispossessed his people offers an opportunity to consider the forms of violence, appropriation and misrepresentation that are perpetually constitutive of settler-colonial cities. -
Submission-In-Chief Melbourne Metro Rail Project EES Hearing Thank Y
National Trust of Australia (Victoria) ABN 61 004 356 192 Tasma Terrace 4 Parliament Place 12 September 2016 East Melbourne Victoria 3002 Email: [email protected] Web: www.nationaltrust.orG.au National Trust of Australia (Victoria) submission-in-chief T 03 9656 9800 F 03 9656 5397 Melbourne Metro Rail Project EES hearing Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment regarding the Melbourne Metro Rail Project (MMRP). We are cognisant of the strategic justification for the project, and we understand that heritage is but one factor that will constrain the MMRP design and construction. Although the tunnelling method adopted will avoid many impacts on heritage, where works are required at street level they often intersect with places of heritage significance, which should be avoided wherever possible, particularly with regard to the Domain where it is very important to provide certainty that the landscape will not be negatively affected. 1 PRECINCT 1—TUNNELS 1.1 Domain Parklands H2304, HO398 - Tom’s Block The National Trust has heard the evidence of Mr Patrick and Mr Shears and retains serious concerns about the effect of soil stabilisation using ‘grouting’ techniques on trees in Tom’s Block. It was the evidence of Mr Lovell, Mr Shears, and Mr Patrick that the alignment should preferably go under CityLink to avoid impacts on the Domain. It is our submission that the alignment option above CityLink would have an unacceptable detrimental impact on the heritage of the Domain, which is characterised by a parkland of scattered trees dotted across lawns, divided by avenue plantings along winding roads and paths. -
Shrine of Remembrance St Kilda Road, Melbourne Conservation
Shrine of Remembrance St Kilda Road, Melbourne Conservation Management Plan Shrine of Remembrance St Kilda Road, Melbourne Conservation Management Plan Prepared for the Shrine of Remembrance Trustees October 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and brief 1 1.2 Site Location and Description 1 1.2.1 Location 1 1.2.2 Description 1 1.3 Heritage Controls and Listings 1 1.3.1 Victorian Heritage Act 1995 1 1.3.2 Planning and Environment Act 1987 2 1.3.3 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) 3 1.3.4 Non-Statutory Listings 4 1.4 Methodology and Terminology 4 1.5 Archaeology 4 2.0 HISTORY 9 2.1 Planning for Victoria’s War Memorial: Choice of a Site 9 2.2 The War Memorial Design Competition 11 2.3 The Architects 11 2.4 The Winning Design 12 2.5 Fundraising 16 2.6 Construction of the Shrine 1928-34 17 2.7 Initial Landscaping Works 1928-1934 20 2.8 World War II Memorial Competition 26 2.9 Landscaping Developments 1951-2000 27 2.9.1 Hard Landscaping Features 27 2.9.2 Plantings 30 2.10 Building Alterations and Maintenance Works 1934-2000 31 2.10.1 Alterations 31 2.10.2 Maintenance Works 32 2.11 Developments Since 2001 33 2.11.1 Building Works 33 2.11.2 Landscaping Developments 34 2.12 A Commemorative Place 34 3.0 PHYSICAL ANAYLSIS 37 3.1 Introduction 37 3.2 Documentation 37 3.3 The Site 37 3.4 Individual Buildings and Elements 40 3.4.1 The Shrine (1929-34) 40 I 3.4.2 Visitor Centre (2003) 57 3.4.3 WWII Forecourt (1951-54) 60 3.4.4 Cenotaph (1955) 61 3.4.5 Eternal Flame (1954) 62 3.4.6 Flagpoles (1954) -
Shrine of Remembrance
Nationally Significant 20th-Century Architecture Revised 9/01/2012 Shrine of Remembrance Address Burdwood Drive, South Yarra 3141 Practice Hudson & Wardrop Designed 1923 Completed 1934 Address History & The building of the Shrine of Remembrance was a commemoration Description of an appalling sacrifice of life in war and an assertion of the nobility of the cause for which so many died. Its huge scale reflects the anguish of the community in that period, and the memorial has continuing significance for subsequent generations to the present Burdwood Drive day. Its design arose from a world wide competition won in 1923 by two South Yarra Melbourne architects and ex-servicemen, Philip Burgoyne Hudson (1887-1952) and James Hastie Wardrop (1891-1975). Both had Vic 3141 studied under D'Ebro and each was a recipient of the Silver Medal of the RAIA. The design, said to be based on the Mausoleum at Halicarnassus, also reflects the contemporary revival architecture of the late 1920s as seen in other such examples which are strongly Neo-Greco in style. However the Shrine, being closer in function to the ancient prototypes, expresses this style more fully both in its external monumental form and in the superb detail of its bronze metalwork. The Domain Hill site, comprising a low hill on the axis of Swanston Street and embraced by a bend of St Kilda Road, gives the Shrine prominence and visibility from all directions. The Shrine is set in a direct line with Swanston Street and is the most dominant of the RAIA Nº three long vistas in Melbourne.